T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
12.1 | | SMURF::BINDER | Qui scire uelit ipse debet discere | Mon Jan 25 1993 11:02 | 8 |
| If I were not told beforehand that nudity was planned, I'd be surprised
and, maybe, a little put out. It is not acceptable to spring something
like that on an unsuspecting visitor.
In Munich, your mileage may vary - especially if you and your hosts are
accustomed in the past to partying nude.
-dick
|
12.2 | | PHONE::DM_JOHNSON | Every angel is terrifying | Mon Jan 25 1993 11:24 | 6 |
| I've done sauna in Munich and my host prepared me for the environment,
rather different from the states. In the states if I'm invited to sauna
or hot tub I usually checkout the nudity expectations before I go so I
know what to expect. Seems to make sense.
Dj
|
12.3 | They are friends !!!! | GYMAC::PNEAL | | Mon Jan 25 1993 11:51 | 23 |
|
"unsuspecting ..."
Agreed - but I did say they were friends.
"In Munich, your mileage may vary ..."
I'm English - my wife's German. In England we don't hang around in public places
naked. Or private places either - unless you're one of the Royal family. So
you could classify me under the banner of 'conservative' and in which case I'd
say my mileage is "probably" the same as yours.
What's wrong with being naked in mixed company ? It's a very honest, natural
state. It doesn't have to be sexual, perverted, or crude.
- Paul.
P.S. Interestingly a consequence of the open attitude is that the incidence
of reported rape, sexual harrassment etc in Munich is the lowest in Germany.
|
12.4 | | SMURF::BINDER | Qui scire uelit ipse debet discere | Mon Jan 25 1993 11:57 | 17 |
| Re .3
>> "unsuspecting ..."
> Agreed - but I did say they were friends.
No problem. But the way you worded the question said nothign about
time or place. You simply asked, "What if you were invited to a BBQ
and...?" Friends notwithstanding, unless I had grown into a casual
acceptance of nudity, which I have not done here in the US of A, I'd
want at least to be warned.
I don't see anything wrong with being naked in mixed company, although
I prefer the word "nude" because "Naked" implies shamefully unclothed
to many people.
-dick
|
12.5 | nakedness, nudity and naturism | CSSE::NEILSEN | Wally Neilsen-Steinhardt | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:31 | 31 |
| .0>How would you react if friends invited you over for a BBQ and you're greeted at
>the door by your friends wife and she's naked ?
Well, it's never happened, so I'd have to guess at my reaction. My first
reaction would probably be to wonder if this was a sexual invitation or
a fashion statement. Given my current set of friends, I would probably
settle on the latter. Then my wife (assuming she is along) and I would have
a quick huddle to decide whether to
A exit with dignity
B stay clothed and join them
C strip and join them
We would probably decide on A, for no stronger reason than an idea of the
situations we feel comfortable in.
I have a chance every year to join a mixed, clothing-optional sauna, but
I never seem to get around to it. Again, no strong reason.
>What's wrong with being naked in mixed company ? It's a very honest, natural
>state. It doesn't have to be sexual, perverted, or crude.
I don't know what might be wrong with it, but I haven't spent much time
thinking about it. The dominant culture in the US is rather negative on the
subject, but there is a minority holding your "honest, natural" opinion. The
majority tends to enforce its opinion in large accessible public places, so
the minority must practice in places that are private and/or inaccessible.
>P.S. Interestingly a consequence of the open attitude is that the incidence
>of reported rape, sexual harrassment etc in Munich is the lowest in Germany.
Can you support your use of the word consequence? In general, just stating
A is true and B is true is not enough to show that A is a consequence of B.
|
12.6 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Mon Jan 25 1993 15:38 | 9 |
| >How would you react if friends invited you over for a BBQ and you're greeted at
>the door by your friends wife and she's naked ?
If I'd been warned I probably wouldn't have gone. If surprised I'd
probably leave. Call it what you will but I'm not socialized to deal
with nudity very well. Perhaps, given time, or in a different culture
I could learn to deal with it but not all at once.
Alfred
|
12.7 | If A is true and B is true and ... | GYMAC::PNEAL | | Tue Jan 26 1993 08:09 | 31 |
|
"In general, just stating A is true and B is true is not enough
to show that A is a consequence of B."
Agreed.
It's a fact that Bavaria has one of the lowest reported crime rates in
Germany (on a par with Baden Wurtenburg). Study groups (from criminologists to
sociologists) have identified a number of influences; these two states are
wealthy, the police and courts deal heavily with offenders, and social
conditions.
Social conditions (in the article I read and subsequent discussion) was
described by factors such as the number of unemployed, the number of homeless,
the number of transients, religion, attitudes and environment. I re-read the
article and no mention of a specific study or scientific evidence which
correlated nudity with sexual offences was made. But then none was made
concerning unemployed, homeless, religion etc. It was only stated that social
conditions were seen as an influencing factor.
From the article, discussion, and observation, *I* had drawn the conclusion
that one of the consequences of a liberal attitude towards nudity was that
some men weren't being driven to search out other ways in which to satisfy
their curiosity/needs. My conclusion also called on the evidence that
de-criminalising (or adopting a more liberal attitude) does have a positive
effect on crime rates. There is always a certain element of the populas who
are attracted to something because it's illegal. It adds that excitement touch.
If you make it legal. The excitement factors gone.
- Paul.
|
12.8 | | TLE::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:24 | 1 |
| Are you saying that men commit sex crimes because they're curious?
|
12.9 | Sex crimes | GYMAC::PNEAL | | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:52 | 8 |
|
You got me - I'm in unchartered territory now.
I was using the term "curious/needs" to embrace the emotions and intentions
which I thought peeping toms, men who steal womens underwear, knicker sniffers,
molesters, exhibitionists etc might feel.
|
12.10 | | SMURF::BINDER | Qui scire uelit ipse debet discere | Tue Jan 26 1993 10:16 | 8 |
| Re .8
Yes. Well, not so much men as boys. High-school boys push their dates
into sex because they want to know what it feels like to score. often
the girls bow to the boys' will, but unwillingly. So technically it's
not a sex crime because she said yes...
-dick
|
12.11 | | CSC32::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Tue Jan 26 1993 12:22 | 9 |
| .0
>How would you react if friends invited you over for a BBQ and you're greeted at
>the door by your friends wife and she's naked ?
I probably wouldn't mind too much, but my wife'd probably lock me in
the bedroom until the party was over ;^).
fred();
|
12.12 | | CCAD23::TAN | Life is a bed of neuroses | Tue Jan 26 1993 17:50 | 11 |
| Perhaps I have misunderstood the use of the expression sex crime, in relation
to some of the replies I've read here. But rape is NOT a sex crime, in that
rapists do not rape for sex. They do it for a sense of power and dominance
over the victim.
So I for one find it hard to accept a correlation between accepted nudity
and a lower rate of (report?) rape.
regards,
joyce
|
12.13 | | COMET::BRONCO::TANGUY | Armchair Rocket Scientist | Tue Jan 26 1993 22:35 | 8 |
| I think the European acceptance of nudity does not result in lower "sex
crime" rates, but the lower rate of (reported) rapes is probably a
result of the greater acceptance they have for their bodies and their
sexuality; which also results in a greater acceptance of public nudity.
I don't know; I've never spent any time in Europe, so I can only guess.
Jon
|
12.14 | | TLE::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jan 27 1993 09:09 | 1 |
| If rape isn't a sex crime, what is?
|
12.15 | Oh, no! Not again! | SMURF::BINDER | Qui scire uelit ipse debet discere | Wed Jan 27 1993 09:17 | 12 |
| Re .14
> If rape isn't a sex crime, what is?
Plese let's not go down this rathole in this topic. Rape is defined by
psychologists as a crime of power/control that uses sex as its outlet.
By the same criteria, incest and pederasty with willing partners are
sex crimes.
Back to the sauna, please.
-dick
|
12.16 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, Alpha P/PEG | Wed Jan 27 1993 19:52 | 5 |
| re:.14
It IS a sex crime.
No sexual element, no rape, it's really quite simple.
|
12.17 | | KERNEL::COFFEYJ | rollercoaster stops on high | Mon Feb 01 1993 12:48 | 8 |
| >How would you react if friends invited you over for a BBQ and you're greeted at
>the door by your friends wife and she's naked ?
answers...
1) wonder if she was going to use an apron before cooking at the BBQ!
2) similar to if it was a male friend
3) probably a bit embarassed to say the least if I hadn't been warned
|
12.18 | | SOLANA::BROWN_RO | The nightmare has ended | Mon Feb 01 1993 18:34 | 8 |
| If you are of the naturist persuasion, there are many places one can
go in the U.S., which is not nearly as liberal, generally, on the subject
of nudity as much of the rest of the world.
I'm not sure I see a link between acceptence of nudity, and sex crimes.
I think the two are unrelated.
|
12.19 | My 2 Cents Worth! | RTOEU::KRICKS | | Mon Feb 08 1993 09:20 | 23 |
| I am an American living in Europe and have given this topic a great
deal of thought.
I believe that it more or boils down to the survival instinct that we
do not make ourselves vulnerable by exposing our "total" selves -
whether that is emotionally or physically which varies from one culture
to another. To be expressive emotionally and free with my body just seems
so intimate - I would feel very vulnerable - something I feel is
appropriate for an intimate relationship but not for the whole world to
see. Some things are just private and other things are for public
consumption.
For instance, in my opinion, the Germans maybe more liberal in exposing
their bodies but are very secretive, more difficult to know emotionally.
While the Americans are very expressive and open emotionally but they are
very private with their body.
So a nude mixed suana in Germany doesn't surprise me because everyone
just sits there and drips sweat not interacting emotionally. But a
nude barbeque with friends - wow - I would not feel comfortable.
/Kim
|
12.20 | my 2-cent worth! | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Wed Feb 17 1993 16:59 | 23 |
| I agree with .19... is not the same. Japan has ofuros for men and for
women and sometime for both and because they do not mingle, they are
very reserved in their expresions towards estrangers there is no
problem... no one seem to notice their neighbor... but a bar-b-q in the
U.S.? I do feel nudity totally inapropriate and in bad taste.
If invited, I would leave and ask to please call me back when they were
"presentable" or in other words... "Please call us back when you're
dressed and ready to entertain your guests..., we'll be glad to return"
On the other hand, I've been in ofuros, there is no social call, so
there is no need to explain - there's no sexual atraction , thus,
no danger of anything leading to anything else, there is only the
subject of getting clean and relax your mucles in HOT water... that's
absolutely heaven after a hard day's work.
I've been in Germany, Holland, and personally, I see no need of nudity
in parks... for that, people can use our own homes and gardens, but a
public place should be suitable and available to all, and nudity is
beautiful on the joung... I've seen bodies that could make you laugh!
they could look 10 times better "wrapped up in some clothing". This is
my opinion
|