T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
820.1 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:56 | 11 |
|
Sandie,
It might be helpful to access Defense_issues, not sure of the exact
pointer. I believe your son would be prosecuted under the appropriate
law, as applies in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. I hope everything
turns out for the best. Hang in there..
David
|
820.2 | Thank you... | JULIET::UCCI_SA | You were better as a fantasy | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:11 | 3 |
| Thanx for the pointer. I'm off to the DEFENSE conference.
Sandie
|
820.3 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:16 | 7 |
|
Sandie,
I looked up the node (it's my own :-) ) Comet::defense_issues.
David
|
820.4 | | BSS::P_BADOVINAC | | Fri Aug 14 1992 15:12 | 31 |
|
There are a couple of considerations for you:
1. The Navy will try and scare the hell out of the parents in case
the AWOL serviceman shows up or calls. They will want the parents
to coerce him into returning. What he has done is serious but
they're not going to execute him.
2. Under the UCMJ he will be prosecuted in a Military court of some
kind depending on how long he stays gone and several other factors
including a biggee called:
2a. Missing ship's (or any unit) movement. This means that if he is
stationed aboard a ship and that ships leaves it's bearth while he
is AWOL, they will add those charges to AWOL.
The reason I know all this is because I was in the Navy. When the
Navy wouldn't let me have leave before I went to Vietnam I went AWOL
for about 45 days. I went through the entire gambit. My advice to
you is:
1. Remain calm, the Navy will not execute your son although he will
be punished depending on how long he stays gone.
2. Do what you can to locate him and strongly encourage him to
return. Tell him to contact the Chaplain if he is having problems
coping.
3. Remind yourself that he is responsible for this action not you.
Patrick
|
820.5 | | UTROP1::SIMPSON_D | $SH QUO: You have 0 miracles left | Mon Aug 17 1992 05:41 | 4 |
| The US armed services are among the few that are *serious* about
tracking down the AWOL. The Oz services figure that if they want out
that much they're better off without them, and after about six months
forget about it.
|
820.6 | | SOLVIT::MSMITH | So, what does it all mean? | Mon Aug 17 1992 09:17 | 6 |
| Actually, the US Military spends very little effort actually tracking
down AWOL personnel. Mostly, they just wait for them to either turn
themselves in or come into the purview of some other law enforcement
agency, or otherwise come into contact with the US goverment.
Mike
|
820.7 | | UTROP1::SIMPSON_D | $SH QUO: You have 0 miracles left | Mon Aug 17 1992 09:23 | 3 |
| OK, that's more sensible. Sounds like they've changed their minds
fairly recently. It wasn't that long ago they were trying to extradite
a deserter from Nam who was in Oz.
|
820.8 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Aug 17 1992 09:53 | 2 |
| It's not surprising that the attitude towards deserters in peacetime is
more laid back than in war.
|
820.9 | | UTROP1::SIMPSON_D | $SH QUO: You have 0 miracles left | Mon Aug 17 1992 10:34 | 5 |
| re .8
That was my point. This guy deserted from the US forces in Nam and
twenty years later when he pops up in Oz the US tried to extradite him.
Bit of a waste of effort that long after the fact.
|
820.10 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Aug 17 1992 11:25 | 2 |
| I thought there was a general amnesty for Vietnam draft dodgers and deserters
during Jimmy Carter's administration.
|
820.11 | | CRONIC::SCHULER | Dance to the rhythm of life | Mon Aug 17 1992 14:22 | 3 |
| Wasn't the amnesty just for draft-dodgers?
/Greg
|
820.12 | AWOL? | ASDG::DANG | | Tue Aug 18 1992 13:45 | 1 |
| Pardon my ignorance, but what is AWOL? Thanks.
|
820.13 | | VMSSG::NICHOLS | Conferences are like apple barrels... | Tue Aug 18 1992 13:50 | 3 |
| Absent WithOut Leave
Unauthorized absence.
|
820.14 | | BLUMON::QUAYLE | | Tue Aug 18 1992 18:20 | 2 |
| Or
Absence Without Official Leave
|
820.15 | just my opinions of course | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Wed Aug 19 1992 08:27 | 16 |
| The Amnesty was offered but persons had to apply for it. Anyone
not applying was still a deserter. The case of draft dodgers
may be different.
AWOL: Away Without Official Leave, is, mentioned in .0, a charge
for being away less than 30 days. After 30 days it becomes
desertion. The difference between AWOL and desertion is like
the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony. In some
cases desertion can be plea bargained down to AWOL. If he
shows up and the Navy wants to keep him it won't be too
bad, if they are reducing forces it will be easy to give him
1 to 6 months in a Navy prison and toss him out afterward.
They won't look too hard for him, they don't have to.
ed
|
820.16 | Prodigal Returns | JULIET::UCCI_SA | You were better as a fantasy | Wed Aug 19 1992 10:52 | 7 |
| Thanx for all your advice. I finally (through the original recruiter)
was able to contact the Transient Personnel Unit in Bremerton to see
what I could find out. I was informed not to worry, my son was back on
base. Of course, he had already been through a court proceeding and
will be discharged (Bad Conduct) the end of this month.
Sandie
|
820.17 | | SOLVIT::MSMITH | So, what does it all mean? | Thu Aug 20 1992 10:42 | 10 |
| I'm glad he came back and that you don't have the uncertainty of not
knowing what's going on to deal with.
He may be able to make an application to have his discharge upgraded to
one less onerous than a Bad Conduct discharge sometime in the near
future. This is not simply a matter of saving pride, but might help in
restoring some veteran's benefits for which he might not otherwise be
eligible.
Mike
|
820.18 | And... | SMURF::BINDER | Ut aperies opera | Thu Aug 20 1992 13:04 | 6 |
| Having his discharge upgraded from Bad Conduct to General wil almost
certainly make a huge difference in his possibilities for getting a job
in the civilian marketplace! A Bad Conduct discharge is an absolute
red flag to employment personnel.
-dick
|