T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
798.1 | honey the kids are watching | TNPUBS::COOK | | Fri Jun 05 1992 09:46 | 6 |
| Must be because of all that violents we see now on TV where a women hits
a man just because he doesn't agree with her.
LEC
|
798.2 | | AIMHI::RAUH | I survived the Cruel Spa | Fri Jun 05 1992 09:58 | 5 |
| Was it Norman Lier (sp) who wrote a book about the feminist revolution
of the early 70's? Welp... I saw him on the tube the other day and the
remarks now are that not only are women aggressive, they play the same
games as the men in the good ol boy/girl network and they are just if
not more ruthless as the men.
|
798.3 | Say it ain't so! | COMET::DYBEN | | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:42 | 10 |
|
Basenoter,
Are you sure it's not just a case of just being reported more
ofte now. You know sort of a male backlash " See wymyn ain't perfect
either, or where was the the video camera when my girlfriend pounced
on me for leaving the seat up again" :-)
David
|
798.4 | another societal problem | EARRTH::MACKINNON | | Fri Jun 05 1992 13:30 | 17 |
|
I think society in general is getting much more physically violent.
Look at the toys that are still on the market for kids. Now at least
around here the latest rage are the super water guns that shoot like
200 feet or somewhere around there. Look at the Teenage Mutant Ninja
toys. They are all used in a violent manner. Physical abuse is
either being reported more or is actually happening more frequently.
As for women competing in the old boy network, sure we do. We have
no other choice though when it comes to our careers. If we want to
play with the big boys we need to play like a big boy. I also think
that there are a few generations of women who were raised with the
thinking that they can do whatever they want to as long as they
put their minds to it. These women know how to compete. The
game is always going to be there, but the players will continue
to change.
|
798.5 | | VALKYR::RUST | | Fri Jun 05 1992 13:48 | 21 |
| There have always been brawling women, if not perhaps in the same
numbers as brawling men. Often it just didn't get reported - for
example, the ever-popular Victorian era tended to ignore any behavior
outside of that of the uppitiest upper classes, and would simply never
mention that there were washerwomen in Whitechapel punching each
other's noses...
It does seem as if violent reactions are on the upswing, though. People
have accused the economic situation, drugs, availability of handguns,
and/or the loss of family values. [Digression re "traditional family
values": I seem to recall a movie called "The Fighting Sullivans," in
which a large and loving family was depicted as having a *wonderful*
time fighting with anybody at hand, including each other. Those were
the good old days, I guess.]
I'm just worried that so many more people seem quick on the trigger. An
argument that used to be settled with words, or at worst a brief
scuffle, now often seems to result in gunplay. Hey, maybe all those
Westerns really _did_ warp our collective psyche...
-b
|
798.6 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Jun 05 1992 15:36 | 2 |
| If Dan Quayle can blame the LA riots on Murphy Brown, I can blame violent
women on the Fabulous Moolah.
|
798.7 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Fri Jun 05 1992 15:45 | 8 |
|
-1
:^)
David
|
798.8 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | nu nu, mmm hmm, yeah yeah | Fri Jun 05 1992 21:45 | 10 |
| re:.0
There's one big difference - the women seem to go for weapons more
often than men do, beer bottles, pipes, knives and guns, when they
get in a "fist fight." Men tend to duke it out barehanded.
Some group studied fights in high schools and found that the girls
(or women) were involved in more fights than boys (or men) were, in
an average school year. Some kind of weapon was used in a larger
percentage of the female-female fights, than the male-male fights.
|
798.9 | | MILPND::MITCHELL | Madness takes its toll | Sat Jun 06 1992 09:33 | 19 |
|
re: 8
I've read that in a *fight* between a man and a women, the
women will usually go for some type of weapon (to make her
feel more equal), but I hadn't read anything about any
percentages of women vs women fighting with weapons in
comparison to men.
As for myself, if another women attacked me, I don't think
I would know how to fight to defend myself. I would probably
resort to pinching, twisting and poking. I don't know how
to use my fists.
<sigh> I suppose I've have to go and take a boxing course
at the local gym.
kits
|
798.10 | I beg your pardon.. | DPD07::GUNDERSON | | Sat Jun 06 1992 14:42 | 47 |
|
I can attest to this......
I am a woman and all though I have not done much *fighting* in my
lifetime - I had one experience I'll never forget.
I used to play softball on woman's league a few years ago.
My best friend of whom is a softball fanatic, talked me into joining a
league and "playing for fun". To my surprise, I found that women in
sports per say are VERY competitive. Most of the women that we played
with and against I can honestly swear that they had some type of male
hormone in their bodies and were incredibly agressive.
All though I am 5'6", I am not a large women - not like these women
anyways and weigh approximately 119 lbs. Most of these women
out-weighed me by at least 75 to 100 lbs. I'm not saying they were
obese - they were built like men!
After a weekend of softball games in an out-of-town tournament, a few
of us on my team decided to head to a local tavern for some
*refreshments*. My team had placed 2nd overall in the tournament and
we felt pretty good about that, but were extremely tired. An entire
team of one of the other women's teams came in to the tavern with
the same idea shortly after we did. We had beaten them out of 2nd place
and they were not too happy about this - needless to say a fight broke
out between a women on our team and woman on their team and suddenly
everybody started fighting. I won't go into the gory details, but
I ended up with a broken hand and badly bruised ribs, my girlfriend
had her nose broken and at one point during all of this I literally
saw one woman from the other team pick up a member from our team, over
her head and threw her across the room. There were no weapons used
of any kind - just a basic "bar-room brawl", like some of you men have
been involved in.
I was floored, I couldn't believe that this was happening at the time
and I surely couldn't believe the kind of fighting taking place. It
wasn't the "womanly" way of fighting with scratching, hair pulling,
etc., it was fists, face smashing and furniture bashing.
Needless to say - I quit playing ball after that on women's league's
and started playing co-ed. It was much more fun, and the only brawls
that took place were arguments over who got the most out's on the team
meaning they had to buy the beer.
-Lynn
|
798.11 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | is this some radical new therapy? | Sat Jun 06 1992 15:01 | 5 |
| In the study I saw, "weapons" included book bags and full cans of
soda.
It was anything besides just hands. Might have included feet, too,
I forget.
|
798.12 | | DSSDEV::BENNISON | Vick Bennison 381-2156 ZKO2-2/O23 | Sat Jun 06 1992 19:23 | 3 |
| re: .10
Who won? :^)
|
798.13 | | DPD07::GUNDERSON | | Mon Jun 08 1992 11:59 | 10 |
| re: -1
Well considering that there were only 5 of us on my team and the other
team had their *entire* team there - it certainly wasn't us.
It wasn't really a win or loose situation though - but we did get our
share of a good beating that night (ha, ha).
-Lynn
|
798.14 | ten pound bats | ETVS07::GUARINO | | Mon Jun 08 1992 14:49 | 9 |
| Lynn,
Considering these women might really be 200lb men, I don't think I'd get in
the ring again without a 10 pound bat with me.
Stick to co-ed, drinking is more fun than winning or getting your head bashed
in. 8^)
David
|
798.15 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Mon Jun 08 1992 15:24 | 5 |
|
-1
Good advice :-)
|
798.16 | scary | DELNI::STHILAIRE | just another roll of the dice | Mon Jun 08 1992 16:45 | 6 |
| re .10, god, what a horror show. I'm so glad I've always hated sports.
re .9, okay, you practice boxing. I'm gonna practice running.
Lorna
|
798.17 | Plug | POBOX::WIECHMANN | Short to, long through. | Mon Jun 08 1992 17:19 | 12 |
|
I'd like to take this opportunity to plug a wonderful co-ed
softball organization in Nashua. Emphasis on fun and socializing,
although sometimes someone remembers what the score is.
Contact Martin Dickau (CLT::DICKAU) to get on the list. Games
are most Wednesdays at the Westgate Village softball diamond
(Martin has directions).
One of the things I miss most since moving to Chicago . . . .
-Jim
|
798.18 | | DPD07::GUNDERSON | | Mon Jun 08 1992 18:31 | 13 |
|
re: .14
I'm not the fighting type and hadn't planned on fighting that night,
but it was the kind of scenario - "either fight or get beaten to a
pulp."
I agree - co-ed is much more, especially since the game is played
for fun and it really doesn't matter who win's or looses....just
as long as *I* don't have to buy the beer (h, ha).
-Lynn
|
798.19 | | TNPUBS::COOK | | Wed Jun 10 1992 14:30 | 12 |
| I don't agree with the idea that sports bring out the fighters, but
I do believe you can have to many rats in the same cage. (studies have shown)
I also don't believe co-ed is better but I'm sure it is more fun.
Remember fighting only take place when communication breaks down. (WW1,WW2)
The problem is that people have not learned to take the time to communicate
but it takes no effort to show you have more power. (life goes on)
LEC
|
798.20 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Wed Jun 10 1992 15:19 | 10 |
|
> when communication breaks down ( WW1,WW2 )
Britian Talked alot, even got a fancy piece of paper,gosh come
to think of it so did the U.S.S.R. Maybe comm or lack of comm
is not necesarily the key to avoiding fights.
David
|
798.21 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Thu Jun 11 1992 03:17 | 6 |
| For WW1 have you looked at political maps of Africa before and
after, and wondered if ownership of colonies might have been a motive?
You would hardly have fought the war in Africa (nasty hot place,
and too far from home), but whoever won was going to take most of
central Africa in the peace treaty.
|
798.22 | Sorry I said the "W" word | TNPUBS::COOK | | Thu Jun 11 1992 08:47 | 9 |
| Well when it comes to history about these wars I'll take the back seat.
As I understand history - it was the events that took place that started the
wars with very little communication between. I just feel with better
communication we could avoid most. Case and point - the Gulf War
Sorry I used the wars as my example - I was really taking about fighting.
LEC
|
798.23 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Thu Jun 11 1992 10:10 | 11 |
|
Monahan,
The suggestion was made that " A breakdown in communication" was the
source of wars. To debate that greed is not a motive would be insane
on my part. But that greed has something to do with communication as
related by the previous author is a straw man arguement.
David
|
798.24 | say what? | TNPUBS::COOK | | Thu Jun 11 1992 23:17 | 12 |
| >798.23
Your suggestion that my view point is a "straw man arguement" shows
your own myopic view. This is the problem with people who can't communicate.
They always try to vilify the other persons view.
Good example on how a war can start. No greed here.
Now - where is that yellow brick road? "ha"
LCE
|
798.25 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 00:02 | 12 |
|
> your own myopic view
Is not is not you straw man you.:-) But seriously Cook the fact that
I chose to disagree with you verbally, and also to explain the
difficulty I have with your arguement, is proof that I am not a person
who cannot communicate. And if you disagree with this I will punch your
lights out :-)
David
|
798.26 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Fri Jun 12 1992 03:11 | 9 |
| Poor communication can be a cause for a war, but it can also be a
technique for starting one. In the case of the Gulf war, the U.S.
needed to control the growing military power of Irak and its imminent
capability to deploy nuclear and biological weapons. In this case I am
inclined to believe it was a technique, but that is just my personal
opinion.
Not that this has anything to do with women brawling, except that
it was a woman that was chosen to deliver the misleading communication.
|
798.27 | silent is golden | TNPUBS::COOK | | Fri Jun 12 1992 14:30 | 6 |
| David
I think.............. I have no comment
LEC
|
798.28 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Fri Jun 12 1992 23:08 | 14 |
|
> I think.............. I have no comment
Lec,
There you have it, this unwillingness to communicate is undoubtedly
a declaration ow WAR!!! Prepare do defend you silence, I attack at
dawn, or maybe evening, depends on what kind of makeup I decide to
wear :-)
David the Terrible
|
798.29 | Oh well | TNPUBS::COOK | | Mon Jun 15 1992 14:47 | 22 |
| Dave
In this case it depends on your definition of communication. Telling
some one you are wanting to start a war and fight is not communication.
Also making comments that simple insults the other persons view is to me
simple the bullets. It is not that I'm unwilling to communicate,
I just don't agree with your definition of it and I'm not willing to
ASCII/text fight over it. Part of communication is learning to listen.
But really - I have enough bullet holes in me. I want to get back to the
subject of woman acting like men. I find this subject very interesting.
I have always felt that men are no better or worse than women but often
men are place in situation that often brings out the worse in the human
race. I feel as women take on the same rows as men, they will do about
the same thing. The good news is that men will not be carrying as much
responsibility and will be come less aggressive
LEC the Lion Hearted
|
798.30 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:04 | 13 |
|
-1 LEC,
Lighten up would yah. i put enough smiley faces on my responses to
choke a horse! Regarding my def of comm, I suspect that it's not
really this , but my insistence that comm or the absence of com is
not the end all start all of wars. But if you choose to disengage at
this point, so be it! Kinda ruins your point tho'
David
|
798.31 | Just a thought about why | BSS::P_BADOVINAC | | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:16 | 31 |
|
I have a 12 year old son that lives with me. I have a 10 year old
daughter who lives with my ex wife.
My ex-wife got my son one of these 'Soaker 200' water guns (I didn't
have a problem with this.) and gave it to him at a little birthday
party we had for him last weekend. My 10 year old daughter was
there along with my ex-wife's husband and my ex-wife. The first
thing he did of course was to fill it up (it holds a couple of
quarts!) and take it outside. We all followed him out and of
course he squirted all of us with it. When he squirted his mother,
she ran away. When he squirted me I charged him, took it from him
and squirted him back. My ex's husband did the same thing as I did.
When he squirted his little sister she went in the house, got a
bucket of water, charged him and drenched him with the bucket of
water.
I don't know if this is a microcasm of our culture but I have taught
my daughters that they don't have to take any crap from people.
They don't have to be victims. My 10 year old, Emily, does not play
the frightened fawn role. When someone attacks her she retaliates.
I don't know why the stats on females violence is going up so
quickly but I suspect it's because females are standing up for
themselves.
As an aside, I found that I had to spend a lot more time with my
daughter to teach her the rules of 'return in kind' than my son. I
have such a small sample I don't care to speculate too much but she
tended toward 'over retaliation' more than my son. Hmmmmmm.
patrick
|
798.32 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:52 | 18 |
|
-1
Wow what a coincidence. My son attended a birthday party a couple
of weekends ago, and at this party a Soaker 200 was being used. My son
dished it out as well as he took it. Occasionally when they would
squirt above the neck ( clear violation of Supreme Command of all
Dads in attendance) the child would cry " Foul, foul, you have broken
the rules" where as the girls participating in the battle would not
complain but rather turn to the judges without saying a word and get
the judgement. The girls also cloobberd the snot oughta the boys once
there parents gave themt he order to fight back. Gee I wonder if this
is proof that wymyn could be better soldiers?? My son had a blast up
until the when another youngin got hot and popped him with a right
cross, m x still has'nt forgiven me :-)
David
|
798.33 | Not so.. | DPD07::GUNDERSON | | Tue Jun 16 1992 18:08 | 14 |
|
Re: Cook & Dyben
I was merely stating a scenario that had taken place that I had been
involved in - I apologize for creating an argument.
I do have to disagree with "Cook" though - this situation had
absolutely nothing to do with communication, lack of or other wise.
This *fight* had to with ego's and hurt prides.
Certainly wasn't "lady-like" (ha, ha).
-Lynn
|
798.34 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Tue Jun 16 1992 22:53 | 10 |
|
Lynn,
Were not arguing. But yes you did start it all :-)
David
|
798.35 | | DPD07::GUNDERSON | | Wed Jun 17 1992 11:31 | 8 |
|
Ok David -
I'll take all blame today, but that's only because as of 4:00 PM today
I"M ON VACATION!!! (ha, ha)
-Lynn
|
798.36 | | COMET::DYBEN | | Wed Jun 17 1992 12:30 | 10 |
|
> I'll take the blame today,
Thanks kiddo! I'l save up more blame for when you get back from
vacation :-)
David
|