| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 675.1 | Let it all hang loose..... | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Thu Oct 31 1991 06:37 | 13 |
| I only wear boxers. I tried wearing some underpants and I felt
like I was being turned into a eunuch....never again! From
what I can gather most women like (even if they don't prefer)
a pair of decent (and clean!) boxers, ie not like your grandad used
to wear. Also, some women don't like the skimpy underpants.
But, as I heard someone say recently, if a woman gets to see your
shreddies (underwear), it probably won't matter if they are the
wrong type. :-)
How many women can resist silk boxers though?
Jerome.
|
| 675.2 | Real men don't wear under wear. :-) | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Thu Oct 31 1991 08:30 | 1 |
|
|
| 675.3 | I'm a pretend man then ? | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Thu Oct 31 1991 08:51 | 8 |
| re : .2
Hope you never forget to zip up your trousers, or don't real
men wear trousers either? :-)
Jerome.
|
| 675.4 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Thu Oct 31 1991 09:02 | 2 |
| Thats the manly part, not grimising when you get the old hose cought in
the fly. WOOOOOOOOOOW! :^)
|
| 675.5 | | CSC32::S_HALL | Wollomanakabeesai ! | Thu Oct 31 1991 09:41 | 12 |
|
Only problem with boxers is that, if you're "less than tall",
you wind up with the waistband somewhere near your armpits.
This is neither impressive to the opposite sex nor
comfortable.
I can't bring myself to do the nylon racing-brief thing, though,
either. Just seems a bit too delicate....
Steve H
|
| 675.6 | It does make a difference | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Phoenix | Thu Oct 31 1991 09:43 | 21 |
|
Re .1
OK Jerome - I confess - I have been known to have a soft spot
for silk boxers ;-)
Basically, I don't care what the person wears (or doesn't) as long
as they're not an active turn-off.
Active turn-offs include ancient, grey underthings of any style,
gross and garish colours/patterns, and old synthetic losing-their-grip
nylon things. Yuch.
Guess I go for natural fibres.
And I don't agree that once you've got to see someone's pants you're
likely to be past caring. I have a lot of platonic male friends stay
over at my flat, and they seem entirely unselfconscious about wandering
around in their underwear in the mornings.
Maybe they'd be a little more self-conscious if they knew what I
thought of their underwear ;-)
'gail
|
| 675.7 | from the orthographic police | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Thu Oct 31 1991 11:11 | 5 |
| Somebody please correct the title! It's *drawers*, as in dresser
drawers, not "draws", regaaaaaadless of how it may be pronounced in New
England!
Leslie
|
| 675.8 | | CSC32::S_HALL | Wollomanakabeesai ! | Thu Oct 31 1991 11:34 | 19 |
|
> Somebody please correct the title! It's *drawers*, as in dresser
> drawers, not "draws", regaaaaaadless of how it may be pronounced in New
> England!
>
> Leslie
No ! No ! Not New England....it's a Deep South thing !
As:
"Gitcha draws own, we're goin' to the sto."
"Ah got mah new woolen draws awn, and them sumbitches itch."
And so forth.
Steve H
|
| 675.9 | For further insight... | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Available Ferguson | Thu Oct 31 1991 14:21 | 3 |
| See note 38.
Ray
|