T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
661.1 | | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Available Ferguson | Thu Oct 17 1991 00:34 | 12 |
| > Any thoughts on this?
Yeah. I don't think it's true. I think it's usually shown that way
because movies / TV / David Mamet are more comfortable with showing
women suffering. (But listen to the Everly Brothers' hits for an
alternate viewpoint.)
From everything I've experienced, read, and seen, which partner has the
easiest time immediately after the breakup depends entirely on which
gets into a new relationship sooner.
Ray
|
661.2 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | on the wings of maybe | Thu Oct 17 1991 09:33 | 22 |
| Please note I'm using a lot of "many" and "might" words below, this
doesn't apply to all men or all women.
I haven't seen "about last night", but when a relationship ends
(typically one of three months to three years, in my case) there is a
period of mourning, of watching the dreams die, of extricating the
heart-hooks from the other person's closeness and life.
I think many women may mourn more strongly because they may invest
emotionally more strongly (by which I mean they get more emotional
sustenance from the relationship, and may rely more heavily on that
emotional sustenance than many men might). Also, I think many women
actually *integrate* themselves into the man's life (i.e., change for
the man, begin to think of themselves as a permanent fixture in the
man's life, and begin to think of not "me and you" but "us").
Thus when the parting takes place, it may *HURT* more (not that men
don't get hurt, and don't cry, and don't feel pain - I've seen it
happen, just that they may not DEFINE themselves in terms of "I am half
a relationship", and thus the loss may not rock them so strongly).
-Jody
|
661.3 | | TALLIS::PARADIS | Music, Sex, and Cookies | Thu Oct 17 1991 11:16 | 27 |
| Re: jody
> I think many women may mourn more strongly because they may invest
> emotionally more strongly (by which I mean they get more emotional
> sustenance from the relationship, and may rely more heavily on that
> emotional sustenance than many men might). Also, I think many women
> actually *integrate* themselves into the man's life (i.e., change for
> the man, begin to think of themselves as a permanent fixture in the
> man's life, and begin to think of not "me and you" but "us").
True... *whichver* partner in the relationship does this to the greater
extent is going to hurt more when it ends. Back in my younger years,
when I considered myself fundamentally unlovable, *I* used to do all of
these things (especially deriving sustenance from the relationship and
changing myself so as to fit my partner better). As a result, the
breakups were always devastating for me. No, I didn't cry (that's a
whole topic in itself), but I did *everything* else -- walked around in
a daze, contemplated suicide, went off my feed, became generally
angstful...
In short, it's not *necessarily* a male-female thing, but in our
society it's *usually* the female who makes the greater emotional
investment going in, and who is likely to feel the most emotional loss
coming out...
--jim
|
661.4 | it depends on the individuals | LUNER::MACKINNON | | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:28 | 18 |
|
Well the guy I just left after almost six years seems to have
no trouble with it. I left because I found out about his affair
and he continues to lie to me. It is very hard for me becuase
we have lived together for a while.
The girl I work with also is going through a similar breakup
and the guy in question also seems to have no problem with it.
So I think it really depends on the individuals. It does seem
that the woman does integrate herself more into the mans life
than the reverse. Maybe that is why it is easier for a man
to get otu of a relationship. I just find it hard to beleive that
these two men in question feel the women involved can still remain
friends with them. Can any guy answer that?
Michele
|
661.5 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Thu Oct 17 1991 12:37 | 8 |
| "We'll still be friends." means "I still care about you and don't want
you to feel hurt more than is necessary for me to pull out of the
exclusive/romantic/committed part of our relationship." He may not
really believe it's possible for you or for him to remain friends, but
it's a blow-softening or perhaps guilt-reducing stance for him to take.
- Vick
|
661.6 | All Depends! | WMOIS::STYVES_A | | Thu Oct 17 1991 13:16 | 12 |
|
I think a lot of it may depend on why the relationship ended. I have
a close friend that was involved in a relationship with a woman that
was going through a very tough time emotionally in her life. My friend
spent a great deal of time guideing her and helping her get her life
back on track. When she was finally back on an even keel after a few
months she suddenly became very distant and aloof. She did express her
gratitude to him but it was obvious that she wanted nothing more to do
with him. He took this very hard. I was able to help him overcome his
feelings of rejection and now he's back on keel.
Men do indeed hurt. It seems that at times we can all be rather cruel.
|
661.7 | Use, abuse, then fuse-much later! | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Thu Oct 17 1991 14:02 | 9 |
| re.1 last paragraph "depends on who gets into a new relationship
sooner, gets over quicker".
How so? I think, at times that it may better, that it's not who
gets into new relationship sooner, but rather, who does not seek
to get into a new relationship quicker but smarter.
HOWEVER, it may help getting into a few new relationships upon a
break up. It helps forgetting. But that's probably 'bout it.
|
661.8 | Depends | PHAROS::FANTOZZI | | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:25 | 20 |
|
I think the situation depends. If there is constant "I don't
know what I want from life" attitudes in the relationship then
a break-up is probably a little less painful because after awhile
that just gets plan old.
If people break-up because they don't know what they want, but they
feel they do love the other person, then they should take time for
themselves and sort things out. Dragging someone else in at a time
when something has just ended is not really fair to that person.
If you really love someone, it's hard to "just get over it" in a
day or so, but eventually it begins to heal.
I have always found that I have such good things and good friends in my
life that it makes it a little bit easier, and not get into the mode of
mourning because life goes on and one should be in it to enjoy it.
Mary
|
661.9 | I'm not a pop-psychologist but I play one on TV | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Available Ferguson | Thu Oct 17 1991 16:26 | 11 |
| I didn't say that the person who quickly got into a new relationship
was free from trouble. Far from it; rebound has its own special
tortures. But that person (man or woman) DOES get over the pain of the
breakup sooner.
Hey, I even read it in a book; it's gotta be true.
And I think the person who "wants to be friends" tends to be the person
who initiated the breakup; again, no matter if it's a man or a woman.
Ray
|
661.10 | | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Thu Oct 17 1991 19:41 | 14 |
| Honestly, the last thing I would want to hear from my breaker-upper,
is "but we can still be friends". And as the breaker, I know that
deep inside, I just want to rid of the guy. I don't care if I ever
hear from him again.
It's an insult to say, "I want your kindness, your careness, your
everything as you are, were, but you can keep your sex."
If that happens, fine. However, I think that's something that comes
about later, by chance. I'd just rather be broken up with, or break
up and leave it at that. For me, I'm not able to handle a friendship
with a past serious "boyfriend". Not that I hate them, contrary.
It just doesn't feel right.
|
661.11 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | on the wings of maybe | Thu Oct 17 1991 20:04 | 11 |
| I have painstakingly managed to sustain friendly relations with ex-SOs,
but only after a period of time that included distance, and sorting
things out on both our parts. It is possible. And it is one thing
several ex's have admired about me. not that it's something everyone
should try, and not that it's something I've done with every ex.
Hearing "let's be friends" right after a break up is not comforting,
nor is it caring. It sounds like the person is assuaging their own
pain.
-Jody
|
661.12 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Thu Oct 17 1991 21:39 | 7 |
| re.0
Gee, I always thought it was the women that went on like nothing
happened and I was the one that was bummed out for 3 months.
-j
|
661.13 | ONLY 3 months??? | SOLVIT::BALINSKI | | Mon Oct 21 1991 19:16 | 6 |
| re: -1
Some women are just good actresses!
Diane
|
661.14 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Tue Oct 22 1991 01:25 | 5 |
| re.13
That must be it! My divorce was 7 years ago and I'm still unattached
and no prospects in sight but then I'm not lookin' either....
-j
|
661.15 | A book which deals with this issue... | JOHNNY::OCONNOR | | Tue Oct 29 1991 19:51 | 19 |
| Several years ago, I read a book about "breaking up" called "Uncoupling" (I
think). I don't remember the name(s) of the author(s), but it had some very
interesting insights about breaking up (or uncoupling).
The book asserted that both partners of a relationship went through a grieving
period; the person who breaks up the relationship goes through the stages of
grieving, etc. while still "in the relationship", while the person who is
"left behind" goes through the stages after the other person "leaves the
relationship."
The book dealt with both heterosexual and homosexual relationships, and I
believe that the author(s) stated that research showed that the type of
relationship (heterosexual or homosexual) had no bearing on the "stages" of
grieving, i.e., the feelings are the same in either case.
Interesting reading, anyhow. I'm not sure about the exact title of the book
or the author(s) since it has been several years since I read it.
-Mary Ann
|