T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
596.1 | pls UNA | NOVA::FISHER | It's Spring | Thu May 30 1991 07:50 | 4 |
| NLP?
EK?
ed
|
596.2 | _ | USCTR1::LRYDBERG | | Thu May 30 1991 12:27 | 2 |
| Please let us know what your experience was when you get back, or what
you wish to share. I'm very interested.
|
596.3 | Can I come? | MORO::BEELER_JE | Iacta alea est | Thu May 30 1991 13:51 | 4 |
| I'm definitely wild and most assuredly a man .. I've never heard of
this ... like to hear more ...
Bubba
|
596.4 | | RUTLND::RMAXFIELD | Lilac time | Thu May 30 1991 14:46 | 15 |
| I saw the "Wildman Weekend" segment on 20/20. IT was very
interesting. My feelings included humor, embarrassment and
being moved to tears. I was especially impressed that some
of the participants were brave enough to share their emotions
in front of the camera.
I'm not sure my own "instincts" would include dancing around
a bonfire, beating drums, or yahooing until my throat hurts, but
that is definitely part of the weekend. I suspect that not
everyone participates in all aspects of the experience
equally.
Please do share the experience here.
Richard
|
596.5 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu May 30 1991 15:07 | 29 |
| re: .0
I'd be very interested in a report from anyone who goes to
this wildman gathering, too. It sounds pretty interesting.
I didn't get to see the 20/20 show. I knew about it and
chose not to watch it, partly because I've wondered about
the integrity of the 20/20 show in general, and because I
wanted to REALLY know what these wildman gatherings were
about, and didn't trust 20/20 to tell me.
I have been at Bly/Meade/Hillman gatherings and then read
about them in print a few days later. This has happened
twice and each time the reporter came only for the first
day, got enough material for his story, and then left.
A friend (who has been with me to Bly-type gatherings) did
watch 20/20 and said that Hugh Downs said that he
"participated", but then in his reporting described what
happened in the third person, not the second person.
So he did not say, "We shared this, we did that, etc."
Instead he said, "They shared this, they did that, etc."
It could be simply a reporter's habit, or it could be that
Hugh went only for the story, not because he wanted to
experience what happened to him...
Wil
|
596.6 | | USWS::HOLT | ceviche and ferns | Thu May 30 1991 16:59 | 2 |
|
so do they howl at moon like dogs, wear skins, and gnaw bones .. ?
|
596.7 | didn't report in the first person either... | NOVA::FISHER | It's Spring | Fri May 31 1991 05:54 | 1 |
|
|
596.8 | Wildman Gathering | IMTDEV::HOOVERM | | Sun Jun 02 1991 23:38 | 6 |
| My first step in preparation is making my own drum. I'am making a 15in.
hand drum to take with me. I will definitely share my experience. It
will be in first person.
Mike
|
596.9 | | VINO::XIA | In my beginning is my end. | Wed Jun 12 1991 23:15 | 23 |
| First of all, I would like to begin with the disclaimers of "to each his
own" and "valuing differences" and all that. I also want to add that I
have great respect for Robert Bly and his poetry (but not that John
Bradshaw and his brave new world), but I think he should stay in the
poetry business.
Well, as a man, I don't find it a pleasant sight of a bunch of "wildmen"
all strangers to each other lying on the floor belching and... uh,
belching from both ends, and playing other "little boys' silly games".
I mean what kind of a heroic journey is that? The other day, I heard
Bly talking about rite of passage for the boys, lack of role models and
losing identity and etc; none of them relevant to this sort of "wildman
gathering". Anyway, he wanted to get all the men to identify with each
other. Sort of saying since women have all those gatherings and bondings
(at least they are doing this among friends), us men want them too.
The question is why?
...
Well, anyone out there wanna grab a beer after work and watch a ball
game on ESPN?
Eugene
|
596.10 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu Jun 13 1991 11:27 | 34 |
| Sure, Eugene.
That was a great game last night between the Bulls and the Lakers.
But why would we want to watch it together, man? You've got
a TV, I've got a TV. Why would we bother to get together to
watch it? You trying to save on electricity or something?
You expecting me to spring for the beer? What's your motive,
pal? We can just talk about it at work today, right?
Besides, if you came over to my place to watch a game with me,
and have a beer, I'd be inhibited. Knowing what you think
about passing gas from either end of my system, I'd be kind
of tense, worrying that I might offend you. I'd rather
watch by myself, you know...
So why is it that you want to watch a game and have a beer
WITH another guy? or with a group of guys?
And for that matter, even if we watched the game separately,
why would we bother to talk about it the next day? What's
the point? I mean, I understood what happened, and how I
felt about what happened. Why would I want to tell you
about it? Why would I care about what you thought about it?
Are you implying that drinking the beer and watching the
game together might actually be more enjoyable than doing
it separately? Are you implying that men enjoy doing
something together?
What if my girlfriend came over and had some beers and
watched the game with us? Would that be OK with you?
Wil
|
596.11 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Thu Jun 13 1991 12:01 | 7 |
| I'm not sure what you are getting at Wil? Although I agree, that
artificially setting something up like that might not work too well,
but when Eugene made the offer, something in me said "sounds like
fun". And I don't know why. I'm not even much of a sports fan.
But when the occasion has come up to sit around with a few guys and
watch a game, it has felt good.
- Vick
|
596.12 | same and different | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu Jun 13 1991 13:00 | 20 |
| I agree, Vick, it is fun. I sat with a friend last night
and watched the Bulls-Lakers game. And I probably would
not have watched (for very long at least) if we hadn't
been trading "Did you see that?" "Jeez, he is unbelievable."
"Boom! Is he hot, six in a row!" "Definitely traveling,
definitely." "What! no foul?" And then the "philosophical"
discussion of whether you have to be a better athlete to
play sport X or sport Y. and the conjectures about salaries,
life styles, etc.
So why is lying around, swapping stories about our lives,
talking about what it feels like to be male at a "wildman"
gathering,and not caring whether we fart or belch any different?
(I think it is different, btw, but let's start out recognizing
that it starts with a bunch of guys "getting together" to do
something that they like to do (together).)
Wil
|
596.13 | hasn't had rave reviews from men I know either... | MAST::DEBRIAE | We're a Family of Assorted Flavors... | Thu Jun 13 1991 13:02 | 75 |
|
RE: 596.9 Eugene
I've had the same feelings you had, respect for Bly as a poet, but if what
I hear is true, I feel that he should stay out of leading men's weekends
(or at least bill it as something zany, fun, and ridiculous; and not a
serious weekend for "men getting in touch with being male").
One description I've heard of one of Robert Bly's "Men's Weekends" from a
friend who went was "a bunch of 30 something guys sitting around pretending
to be indians and glorifying farting". Another person described it as
"basically the beer and football and complain-about-the-wife crowd, only
without the beer and football." I've never been so I can't judge myself..
but from their descriptions I think I would have been disappointed if I had
gone. [nevertheless I'd still like to, to see for myself].
I came across this in one of my men's issues groups, and include it as lite
banter and humor. It's Matt Groening's "Akbar and Jeff" series, not one of
his funniest but OK...
=============================================================================
CALLING ALL MEN! CALLING ALL MEN!
GET IN TOUCH WITH YOUR SWEATY - GRUNTING - HAIRY MASCULINITY
AT
<pic of fezzoid in AKBAR & JEFF'S <pic of fezzoid in
loincloth, saying WILD MAN loincloth, saying
"GRRR."> WEEKEND "DOUBLE GRR.">
held at the YMCA Summer Camp at the edge of town near the mall
<men only bub!>
YOU WILL NEED: DO NOT BRING:
1 Loincloth *Deoderant
(or bikini-style underpants) *Nude Playing Cards
1 Jar Of Warpaint *Lite Beer
(wife or girlfriends lipstick ok) *Fraternity Spanking Paddles
1 Large Cigar *TV Remote Control
1 $300.00 check or money order *Small Handguns
made out to akbar and jeff
FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
------ -------- ------
6pm Bus Pickup Dawn Nude Jumping Jacks 1am Ouija Board Seance
(meet in parking lot D 7am Breakfast: Cold (Joseph Campbell speaks
of old mall, behind Cereal, Day-Old Bran from beyond the grave)
circus of snacks Muffins 6am Sunrise Sea Chanty
pavillion) 8am Seminar: "The Joy Sing-Along: "Ahoy
7pm Introductory Remarks of Pounding Nails" Matey" "Proud to be
Hearty Handshakes, Bunk 9:15am Lecture: "How a Seadog" "99 Bottles
Assignments, Group Howl to snap your fingers of Grog on the Wall"
8pm Dinner: Franks & like Mel Torme" + More
Beans, Hard Rolls 11am Strutting Around 7am Breakfast: Bacon
9pm Lecture: Noon Lunch: 9am Running Naked thru
"Wimp No More!" Mystery Surprise the Woods
10pm 1:30pm Chest Pounding 10am Poison Ivy First
Open Mike Poetry Yelling 2:30pm Flower Sniffing Aid Clinic [!]
12am Lights Out 3:30pm Leap Froggin' Noon Lunch: Beef Jerky,
(snoring is encouraged) 5:30pm Dinner: Coffee
Leftover Mystery 1pm Lecture: "How to
Surprise Fantasize About
8pm Films: "King Kong"/ Sleeping With Lots Of
"The Incredible Mr. Attractive Women"
Limpet" 3pm Lecture: "Wisdom
of the Howler Monkey"
4pm Farewell Ceremony,
Group Weeping
FREE T-SHIRT TO ALL COMERS: "I SPENT A WEEKEND BEING A WILD MAN"
<Tattoos also
Available>
|
596.14 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Thu Jun 13 1991 14:12 | 3 |
| Wil,
I didn't say it was different. Was Eugene saying it was different?
I'm confused, think I'll shuddup already. - Vick
|
596.15 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | The man with a child in his eyes... | Thu Jun 13 1991 14:41 | 19 |
| >(or at least bill it as something zany, fun, and ridiculous; and not a
>serious weekend for "men getting in touch with being male").
Why do you see these as mutually exclusive?
>I've never been so I can't judge myself.
Exactly
>but from their descriptions I think I would have been disappointed if I had
>gone. [nevertheless I'd still like to, to see for myself].
I've been -- I disagree with your friends' descriptions and assessments.
If you want to find out what these gatherings are like, by all means,
go. But try to leave your preconceptions at home; otherwise you're
almost surely going to be disappointed.
andrew
|
596.16 | want to expereince it for myself... who knows. | MAST::DEBRIAE | We're a Family of Assorted Flavors... | Fri Jun 14 1991 10:55 | 22 |
| RE: Andrew
>>(or at least bill it as something zany, fun, and ridiculous; and not a
>>serious weekend for "men getting in touch with being male").
>
>Why do you see these as mutually exclusive?
Hmm... I don't really. Just the idea of sitting with a bunch of
people (either men or women) and having exercises to pass gas seems
kind of silly when I would have been expecting something more like
core groups of men engaged in serious group discussion for what it
is like for each of them to be male, etc.
But I haven't gone for myself yet, so who knows, it may work well
in the context of their activities, who knows...
Thanks for your reactions from the weekend, I'll keep an open mind.
(And if anyone knows when another Bly weekend is coming to the
area, it'd be great if you could pass the info on here...)
-Erik
|
596.17 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Fri Jun 14 1991 13:30 | 100 |
| "exercises to pass gas"
Hmmm...
I passed a lot of gas, but never felt it was
part of an "exercise."
Passing gas from either end of one's GI tract is not done
in "polite" circumstances. And when it is involuntarily
done, one is expected to say, "Excuse me." So, in places
like the office workplace, the home, restaurants, etc,
one operates by this "politeness" rule.
A group of men get together (for any reason, whether it be
to explore what it is to be men, to watch a basketball game,
to play softball). Are they going to follow politeness rules?
Yes, if they feel that those rules still have value in this space.
No, if they feel that those rules do not apply in this space.
I think if you pass some gas while sitting on the bench at
a softball game, you are not going to ask your teammates to
excuse you. If the odor drives a few teammates away, they
may playfully ridicule you, but they do not think less of
you for it, nor do you feel embarassed or shamed. That's
because some of the politeness rules are suspended on the
softball bench.
So what happens when 80 men get together for a week with
Bly? No one is quite sure what to
expect. There is a lot of tension on the first day, and
everyone is "up tight." (But in no way showing it, of
course! Everyone is cool, or joking to try to keep cool,
or horsing around to try to do something with the body
energy. SURELY, you know what I am talking about!?)
Some barriers have to come down, or the horsing around has
to get organized (like some kind of athletic game -- like
softball, for that matter), or we have to start felling
trees or digging ditches, or something! There is all this
male energy and we had better start doing something with
it. Sitting in a chair with your notebook, waiting for
Bly to start reciting poetry doesn't do it, you know?
Bly talks about this, says that in a more primitive society
we would be sticking spears in each other, if we did not
have some way to handle this male energy. Something has
to start removing barriers. Bly and Meade usually get
everyone on their feet, in two groups facing each other,
teach everyone a chant, and get the two groups dancing
in an advancing/retreating movement. The advancing group
makes a gesture (in unison) at the retreating group while
chanting their chant. Then the other group takes up their
chant, stops retreating and starts advancing, the original
group retreats. This to and fro motion repeats, with
a strictly maintained "ritual space" between the groups.
Spokesmen for each group leap into the space and suggest
the next gesture to use. The gestures are shaming, demeaning,
revolting, disgusting, etc.
When this is over, everyone (who got into it) is sweating,
laughing, bumping into other guys, pushing chairs around
to set up the space for talk, etc. It now is more like
the softball bench. Politeness has retreated, barriers
have come down, and we didn't do it by having a little
debate with Roberts Rules of Order about how to go about
removing some politeness rules...
I think it is the shedding of this politeness restriction
that is welcomed when men get together. Passing gas is
another politeness rule that is dispensed with. It is
each man's way of saying, "Yeah! Let's not follow that
silly restriction for the next five days!" Each indicates
agreement with the lifting of that politeness rule by
passing some gas. It's like an ante in a poker hand.
You have to pass a little gas to play the game.
It's one less barrier, one less silly rule that is going
to operate.
I think it is only symbolic. It certainly is not important
that men pass gas at a men's gathering! And I have never heard
it discussed, just done.
Wil
(And a reporter, who goes with a critical eye, and a notepad,
who does not intend to fully participate, but only to get his
story, is going to see it all as "little boys playing silly
games." That's because the reporter is not there for the same
reasons as the other men.)
(And I don't mean to say that every man there is into the
gathering in the same way. The edges of the dancing chanting
crowd will have a few with sad smiles on their faces, kind of
half going through the motion and the chant, embarassed by
something which is prohibited by their own politeness rules.
They want to play the poker hand but aren't willing to ante.
They may want to hear Bly, but they don't want to risk
anything, least of all some kind of rule that says, "Men
don't dance, men don't act silly, men don't fart, etc.")
|
596.18 | To each his own; and respect each other as they are... | AKOV06::DCARR | SINGLES Camping Hedonism II: 19 days! | Fri Jun 14 1991 17:30 | 50 |
| (Please notice that while this one quote got me to write, that the
remainder of my comments are not directed at any one individual note or
noter...)
> There is all this
> male energy and we had better start doing something with
> it. Sitting in a chair with your notebook, waiting for
> Bly to start reciting poetry doesn't do it, you know?
I guess this is the part I don't get about these 'male bonding'
things... I know how _I_ prefer to 'start doing something' with MY
male energy, and I can tell you, while the above doesn't do it for me,
neither does engaging in a ritualistic dance with a bunch of other guys
in the same situation, if you know what I mean... I mean, I'd much
rather either play sports with the guys, or go out with women... and
playing sports with guys doesn't come close, either! ;-)
I mean, hell, I "male bond" all the time, I don't need to pay money to
go to a freakin' conference for it! Now, before you flame me, I have
a very good friend that is a member of one of these men's groups (who
knows, could be in one of yours), and he goes on these weekend retreats,
and team meetings, and all... And he HAS tried to get me to join, in a
low-key sort of way (which I appreciate), but I guess I just don't feel
I need that... But, if it makes him (or you) happier, go for it! And I
have noticed that he will hug me instead of give me a handshake, and I don't
have any problem with that - we've been good friends for a long time,
and my parents taught me that its not unmanly to show affection to a
good friend, male or female... but if he didn't get that, and these
groups give that knowledge to him, great!
BUT - I _DO_ get offended when I get this 'religious fervor' pitch to
do ANY of these types of things... So, I just wanted to say before you
flame, hey if you want to do these things, great, have a blast, and I
won't think any less of you for doing them... just don't think less of
me for NOT doing them - and don't insult me by insinuating that I am
any less of a man, or any less in touch with my manliness or my
feelings, for not joining in...
(Sorry, but I just thought of a great line by a Saturday Night comedian
whose name I'm blanking on... Dennis Miller:
"And these born-again Christians, what is that?? Is there any limit to
this? Can you be born again, and again, and again? And I really hate
it when they ask me if I have been saved, and born again... I mean,
excuse me for getting it right the first time, you know" ;-) ;-)
Another great Friday afternoon discussion ;-)
Dave
|
596.19 | This above all--To thine ownself be true. | VINO::XIA | In my beginning is my end. | Tue Jun 18 1991 16:39 | 42 |
| I guess I just don't quite understand this "men's movement" phenomenon.
Alright, so there is this feminist movement. And I think it is by and
large a high-middle class career women's movement that is trying to be
avant-garde in the brave new world of business and politics.
Besides a few things like alimony and child support, I can't think of
any reason for this "men's movement" other than the "they got their movement
so we gotta have ours". They wanna "growth" and be "bonded" and at the
same time "liberated"...
So we too want that. But definitely not in the touchie-feelie and "wanna
belch wildman" gathering. I mean how original can that be, man.
Personally, I think we (both men and women) become who we are after a long
history and much of what is noble and universal has been spoken, sung, painted
again and again already. Hence, the first stage of the "growth" is to learn,
appreciate and assimilate these tradition and culture. To me, "growth" means
personalizing what is universal. Make it part of me.
I vaguely remember Bly saying something like "few men know what it means to
be a man any more" (with all the effect of the grave tone of doom and gloom
of a poet). Then there is another article in another notesfile about a
bunch of people who can't think of any positive to say about the male of
the species. Well, I think they are nutty. What does it mean to be a man?
Here is something from Martin Cooper describing the first movement of
Beethoven's "Eroica". I think it is also a good description of what is
noble about being men.
"The scale of the opening Allegro con brio is enormous, the gait of the
music supremely noble and confident, its gestures both generous and touched
with tenderness. There is no hint here of the over-bearing arrogance of
Nietzsche's superman or Wagner's Siegfried. The all-pervading impression
of strength comes from the controlled vigour and variety of Beethoven's
rhythms, either heavily accented off the beat and suggesting an
indomitable will to resist, or flowing boldly forward in an irresistible
stream."
I guess few of us will ever measure up to this ideal, but there is no
competition. The gist is at forever striving towards the ideal and then
you are already there.
Eugene
|
596.20 | | BIGUN::SIMPSON | Myopically Enhanced Person | Wed Jun 19 1991 04:26 | 11 |
| re .19
>I guess I just don't quite understand this "men's movement" phenomenon.
Women's liberation can't exist in a vaccuum. The male/female roles are
complementary, so you can't radically change one side without a
concomitant reaction from the other. Men, and the meaning of manhood,
is under distinct threat and there must be redefined. Otherwise, it's
a path to self-destruction, because if the two can't get back in synch
(and there certainly is no going back) then we'll never arrive at the
new synthesis, which is a complete and whole person/society.
|
596.21 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Wed Jun 19 1991 11:02 | 3 |
| The latest Newsweek has a long article on the men's movement. If I
get the time I'll enter some excerpts.
- Vick
|
596.22 | | TNPUBS::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Thu Jun 20 1991 13:24 | 54 |
|
>Besides a few things like alimony and child support, I can't think of
>any reason for this "men's movement" other than the "they got their movement
>so we gotta have ours". They wanna "growth" and be "bonded" and at the
>same time "liberated"...
For me, it's this. The women's role has been changed, and there is
pressure on the men's role to change. For me personally, this has
produced an emotional see-saw effect of:
o No consciousness around gender.
o "Oh, I should be a feminist."
o "Oh, aggression and conflict are 'bad.' Okay, I got it."
o "Oh, feminists hate men. But then how can I be a
feminist?"
o "Can aggression and conflict be good?"
o "Why is it that I work with women feminists but still feel
'other'?"
o "Can I be 'manly', whatever that is, without being a macho
creep?"
o "How can I not be manly when I am a man?"
o "Why don't I just spend some more time with other men and
check in with them on how they are handling all these
questions and changing times."
The societal perspective of "what it means to be a man" is shifting,
and it is comforting and (*gasp*) empowering to be with other men to
try to acknowledge what the changes mean to us personally instead of
being spoonfed either by feminists or by traditionally masculine
stereotypes.
I think it's also safe to say that a lot of men--me included--did not
get a lot of information passed down from our fathers. Going to these
workshops (and others) to investigate how I want to go about being a
man is a lot better than what I have been doing for the past 30 years:
winging it alone, terrified that I wasn't adequate.
If you aren't interested in any of these questions or in the changing
gender roles (maybe the roles that you are using haven't changed much
in the past 20 years), then I can see why this type of weekend
wouldn't appeal to you. Maybe you had a really communicative father
who passed down a lot of good information to you and was a good
companion/mentor for you.
--Gerry
|