T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
592.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed May 15 1991 15:33 | 15 |
| The answer depends on the state in which you live. Some states don't have
such a thing. In general, it is a declaration that the couple is living
apart, and is sometimes needed to obtain injunctions against your spouse.
I believe that "legal separation" does not exist in Mass. or NH - the thing
you have to do is file for divorce.
Legal separation doesn't itself imply rights to "see someone else". But
such a condition can affect your tax filing status.
As is best with all matters of this sort, you should contact a competent
attorney who is knowledgeable about "family law". Often your initial
consultation is free.
Steve
|
592.2 | Here's what I was told | STAR::BARTH | Ride the whims of your mind | Wed May 15 1991 15:56 | 16 |
| Steve is absolutely correct. There is no such thing as "legal"
separation in NH or MA. The lawyer I spoke with said that the
concept of legal separation was a holdover from days when divorce
had to be someone's fault. If there was no adultery or any other
so called valid reasons for the divorce, they would file for a
separation, then after some set amount of time, they could divorce
under the auspices of abandonment. In no fault states like NH or
MA, this is not relevant.
A lawyer can help a lot, even just to help you see your options in
the beginning. There are also books out there, such as _The Divorce
Handbook_ which can give a good idea of what questions to ask yourself,
your spouse and your lawyer.
Good luck,
Karen.
|
592.3 | My $0.02 | OLDTMR::REEBENACKER | Most Difficult <> | Wed May 15 1991 16:58 | 6 |
| My own personal experience contradicts what was said in the previous
replies. I went through the divorce process within the last couple of
years in Mass. My ex and I were legally separated when the separation
agreement was executed, from what my lawyer told me, even though our
divorce was no-fault. You should get your questions answered by a
lawyer.
|
592.4 | | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Wed May 15 1991 19:31 | 16 |
| My Massachusetts and New Hampshire lawyers both advised against paying
for a legal separation, which accomplishes nothing in particular
(although it does allow a person to make the decision a step at a time,
which can be comforting). Both lawyers told me that going through
legal separation and then divorce can be very much like going through
divorce twice, and that each proceeding is expensive.
Pro: a friend of mine did get a legal separation in New Hampshire
a few years ago, and later divorced. This person said that even
though it was very expensive and s/he would never recommend it to
anyone else, it would have been difficult and maybe impossible
(emotionally) for her/him to go from marriage to divorce without the
interim step.
aq
|
592.5 | Helpful message from an anonymous contributor | QUARK::MODERATOR | | Fri May 17 1991 12:52 | 55 |
| I received the following mail from a member of our community who wishes
to remain anonymous, but who gave permission for the text to be posted
here.
Steve
Not to take this down the proverbial rathole, but let me relate to you
the conversation I had with my lawyer about 30 mins ago. I don't know
if any of this would be of value to the base noter or not. If you
think it would, as you probably know at least which state he/she is
in, feel free to forward it.
Me - Am I "legally separated"?
Him - No. Your separation is legal due to the agreement between the
two of you which is on file at the courthouse, but you are not
"legally separated".
Me - Could I be if I wanted to?
Him - In New Hampshire (long pause - he *possibly* stopped one
thought here and began another one) the only difference between
a legal separation and a divorce is at the end of the proceedings
you end up with a decree of legal separation versus a decree of
divorce. The process is the same. I don't recommend it.
(This is very ambiguous, I know. I could have pushed for a
more definitive answer, but didn't. Reading these words (which are
as direct quotes as I can make them from memory), I don't know
what conclusion can be drawn about this specific question.)
Me - Can I "see" someone else?
Him - There is no legal prohibition against either of you seeing
someone else, but I would urge you not to. The reason is because
you have cited irreconcilable differences as the reason for filing
for divorce, and if you were to see someone else, and your wife
found out about it and got all upset over it, she could dispute
the irreconcilable differences reason and start talking about
other grounds. Then the court would have to make a finding as
to the real grounds for the filing. It gets messy and
complicated, and unnecessarily places you at additional risk.
My advice is avoid any relationships until your divorce is final.
Me - Are there any tax consequences?
Him - No. Talk to your accountant. You are still legally married as
far as anyone, IRS included, is concerned. Your tax consequences
and options are the same as they were before your separation, and
will remain so until your divorce. Your tax strategy and planning
might change but it is very much an individual thing based upon
your unique financial circumstances. The separation does not
directly alter your tax filing options.
|
592.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon May 20 1991 12:05 | 3 |
| I don't think the author of the mail I posted in .5 was looking for advice.
Steve
|
592.8 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Mon May 20 1991 12:45 | 7 |
| Steve,
Sorry, I thought that he was? At least from the base notes? What
does he want if you don't think he wants advice? Does he want to
reconcile?
George
|
592.9 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Mon May 20 1991 14:05 | 6 |
| the writer of .5 is not the same as the writer of .0,
since the writer of .5 refers to the basenoter as
someone else.
Wil
|
592.10 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Mon May 20 1991 14:07 | 1 |
| Sorry! Got confused I will delete my questions then. Thanks!
|
592.11 | | BSS::S_MURTAGH | | Wed May 29 1991 19:14 | 6 |
| In Colorado, there is a mandatory "waiting period" before a divorce
decree can become final. The only "advantage" I have been able to
discover to a "legal separation" is that any time you are legally
separated counts against the waiting period, so a divorce can become
final a little sooner.
|
592.12 | Get married in hours, but divorce takes years... :-( | AKOV06::DCARR | SINGLES Camping: Cheap Hedonism II | Thu May 30 1991 18:44 | 10 |
| Is that separate from what I can only refer to as a "remarrying"
period?? In Mass., I know you can't remarry for a year, and the
'speed' of the judicial process could drag out a divorce signing
seemingly forever, but I am under the assumption that your divorce is
final once you sign that little paper and make your court appearance..
Or are you saying that before you do that in Colorado, you have to
wait? Oh, that makes sense...
Dave
|
592.13 | | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Wed Jun 05 1991 18:42 | 3 |
| Here in New Hampshire, to remarry, you have to be divorced... Unless
thats why your being divorced! :) as in more than one marriage!:0 And
that can be a real legal bag of worms.
|