T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
531.1 | | KERNEL::DICKSON | | Fri Nov 23 1990 06:32 | 18 |
| Hi Liz,
God you must be in the mood for a good ruck today!
But I have to ask which is better, the man who openly admires the
beauty of others, or the women who secretly does so. Surely it is
better to be honest and let your partner know what your doing, rather
than pretend to be all starry eyed and loving whilst secretly eye-ing
up the talent!
But I understand and respect your point of view! (NOTE TO OTHER
NOTERS! - I had to say that as Liz only sits about 20feet away from
my desk and I didnt want to be beaten to death!).
Bye
Michael
|
531.2 | A Guys view! | KERNEL::DICKSON | | Fri Nov 23 1990 07:00 | 84 |
|
I say this in the Dave Barry Note file and I just had to put it
in here! As Liz was probably one of the 3000 women questioned!
<<< HYDRA::DISK$USERPACK02:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DAVE_BARRY.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Dave Barry - Noted humorist >-
================================================================================
Note 615.0 Low opinion women have of men is unfair. No replies
HOO78C::ANDERSON "I'm Happy when I'm Hacking" 72 lines 29-JUN-1990 03:36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low opinion women have of men is unfair
by
Dave Barry
Speaking on behalf of all the guys in the world except possibly
Phil Donahue, I want to say that I am really ticked off about the
results of this recent poll of women. You probably read about it. The
Roper Organization asked 3,000 women the following question:
``Do you agree that the average man today is a lazy selfish
opinionated egotistical sex-crazed tub of crud who never thinks about
anybody but himself and refuses to help with childrearing or housework
and wants to go to bed with practically every woman he meets who is not
legally his grandmother and tends to have the same annual output of
natural gas as Montana?''
Eighty-seven percent of the women agreed with this. The other 13
percent noted that men also pick their noses at stoplights.
By scientifically analyzing these results, we can conclude that
women do not appear to have a high opinion of men. This is unfair. Oh,
sure, men in the past have displayed certain unfortunate behavior
patterns that tended to produce unhappy relationships, world wars, etc.
But today's man is different. Today's man knows that he's supposed to be
a sensitive and caring relationship partner, and he's making radical
lifestyle changes such as sometimes remembering to remove the used
tissue wads from his pockets before depositing his pants on the floor to
be picked up by the Laundry Fairy.
And so here we men are, making this kind of extreme sacrifice, and
WHAM, the Roper Organization hits us with the fact that women still
think we're jerks. This really burns my briefs. I mean, I'd like you
women to stop and think for a moment about what this world would be like
without men. Think of the vast array of cultural and scientific
achievements you'd have to do without, including:
1. Football.
2. Professional football.
3. Ear hair.
4. Betting on football.
The list just goes on and on. And let's talk about men's alleged
obsession with sex. Do you women think that men are just ANIMALS? Do you
really think that all they want to do is get you into bed? Wrong! A lot
of guys, especially in bars, would be happy to get you into a phone
booth! Or right there on the bar! (``Nobody will notice us,'' the guy
will say, being suave. ``They're watching `Wheel of Fortune.''')
But that doesn't mean ALL guys are like that. There are countless
examples of guys who think about things besides sex. The guys on the
U.S. Supreme Court, for example, think about important constitutional
issues, as is shown by this transcript from recent court deliberations:
CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST: Whoa! Get a load of the torts
on THAT plaintiff!
ASSOCIATE JUSTICE BYRON R. WHITE: (Dies.)
And I am particularly outraged by the charge that guys never help
out around the house. I happen to be a guy, and often, when my wife goes
away, I assume Total Responsibility for the household, and my wife has
such confidence in me that she will often wait for an entire half-hour
before she calls:
MY WIFE: Is everything OK?
ME: Fine!
MY WIFE: Is Robert OK?
ME: Robert?
MY WIFE: Our child.
ME: Robert is here?
My wife likes to give me these helpful reminders from time to time
because once she went away for several days, and when she got home, she
determined that all Robert had eaten the entire time was chocolate
Easter-bunny heads. But other than that, I am very strong in the
homemaking department, the kind of guy who, if he gets Cheez Whiz on the
sofa, will squirt some Windex on it without even having to be told.
So come on, women. Stop being so harsh on us guys, and start seeing
past our macho hairy exteriors, into the sensitive, thoughtful, and --
yes -- vulnerable individuals that we are deep down inside. And while
you're at it, fix us a sandwich.
(C) 1990 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
531.3 | I jost cannt spel | KERNEL::DICKSON | | Fri Nov 23 1990 07:02 | 6 |
| That should be I saw this..........
SAM could you check my spelling! (see Great_Britain 888.lots to
understand this!).
Bye
|
531.4 | No equal rights for uglies! | KERNEL::CLATWORTHY | | Fri Nov 23 1990 08:30 | 14 |
|
Mmmmmmmmmm..interesting reading, amusing, but nothing to do with
this note!!
I don't have a low opinion of men, I was just relaying an observation!
I agree that honesty is necessary, but couldn't it include just
the slightest hint of discretion & goodness me, maybe even
discrimination?
Liz
|
531.5 | We just cant win! | KERNEL::DICKSON | | Fri Nov 23 1990 08:46 | 27 |
| Men just cant win!
I once was going out with a girl who told me a story one evening
about the day she had. But the thing that really pi**ed her off
was walking past a building site! It was a hot summer day, and the
guys with cleavages in their pants were watching the world go by
as they drank their tea! One girl walked past and being dressed
to suit the weather was whistled at and shouted at - as Im sure
we've all seen (I would like to point out that I dis-approve of
this practice). However my girlfriend at the time was the next
person to walk past their gaze! and guess what.......
they didnt whistle!!!!! was she annoyed or what!
If they had whistled she probably would have moaned about that too!
Anyway, going back to .4 - Liz, discriminate! Now you really are
being cruel. Are you suggesting that if we men have to look at other
women we should only do it to beautiful women! How cruel, just think
how hurt and deflated all the uglies (your term not mine!), would
feel! No, that really would be insensitive!
Bye
Michael
p.s. Does Jamie know how you feel about him! :-)
|
531.6 | Ugliness is only skin deep | AYOV18::BPARK | | Fri Nov 23 1990 09:32 | 22 |
| I like things of pleasure and beauty.
I like to sit at the beach and watch a beautiful sunset, I like to
listen and relate to really good music, I like to watch and admire
good football, I like to eat and praise good food, I like to look
at and 'ogle' attractive women.
If I am in a woman's company at the time will she only get upset
at the last one? I have 'ogled' women in company of a woman friend
as she ogled the men. There was no problem and we found out what
our likes and dislikes were. I guess if I did the same thing in
company of a girl-friend or wife it would be a different story.
So I don't see any problem in admiring ALL nice things so why should
a woman in a particular relationship with a man object to and try
to restrict him from admiring one category of pleasure in particular?
Jealousy, low self-esteem, possessiveness?
As for 'ugly', I don't know. I know that some women that I would
ogle would not get a glance from someone else and v.v.
Brian.
|
531.7 | | HLFS00::RHM_MALLO | the wizard from oss | Fri Nov 23 1990 09:37 | 4 |
| My better half and myself always look at nice things, including men and
women and we point eachother to espially nice species.
Charles
|
531.8 | | FORTY2::BOYES | NUTMEGS YOUR MAN! | Fri Nov 23 1990 09:57 | 10 |
| I think my objections at ogling whereas looking at sunsets is ok are that
1) The other person is their property and the sunset is public.
2) The other person is as much a sentient entity as the person doing the ogling
and shouldn't be objectified.
Of course you could say that the body is just the chunk of meat that person
happens to be wearing...
Mark.
|
531.9 | Women rool ok! | BEEZER::CLATWORTHY | | Fri Nov 23 1990 12:11 | 6 |
|
Well, I still think it's due to some men's arrogance & insensitivity!
Liz
|
531.10 | Flirting = very safe sex these days ... | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Mon Nov 26 1990 02:48 | 16 |
| Insecurity ...
If a woman gets annoyed at her SO looking at another women, it's
insecurity. Same goes for jealous men. I mean, if you're confident
that your relationship is strong, why should a *person* looking at
another *person* bother you ? The world is full of 'em !
True, men are more likely to ogle than women, but these guys usually
don't keep a good woman very long either. Can't blame 'em though,
there's only about 6 or 7 of 'em out there anyway ... 8^)
Smile ladies .... 8^)
Jerry
|
531.11 | :-) | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Mon Nov 26 1990 07:07 | 1 |
|
|
531.12 | | PEKING::BAKERT | Too HOT to handle,too COOL to be BLUE | Mon Nov 26 1990 07:19 | 3 |
| 8-)))))
I am , I am !!
|
531.13 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Mon Nov 26 1990 12:37 | 12 |
|
As moderator:
I deleted a title to one of the notes in this string.
Please do not use explicit and/or sexual references to
people's body parts.
Thanks. Back to your regularly scheduled discussion...
--Gerry
|
531.14 | Insecurity vs. Jealousy | SFCPMO::GUNDERSON | | Mon Nov 26 1990 18:10 | 11 |
|
RE: .10
Insecurity and jealousy are two different things, getting a bit jealous
over your SO looking at another is one thing, but getting upset about
is another. People wouldn't be human if they didn't have jealous
tendancies. I don't mind jealousy as long as it's in a very moderate
form.......insecurity, I can't stand.
-Lynn
|
531.15 | Oggle Me! | SFCPMO::TEGLOVIC | Living is easy with eyes closed | Mon Nov 26 1990 19:11 | 12 |
| I for one would never pass the opportunity up to oggle an
attractive body. Of course, I do use tact and keep the oggle
to a minimum, say a couple seconds, as opposed to some of my
good buddies who have to have a long look and add a cat call..
My SO does the same thing, if she didn't, I'd worry about her.
If you get upset about your SO doing it, I'd suggest examining
the security of your relationship. If you get upset about
people doing it to you, feel flattered that you were graced with
an oggleable body.
Gene
|
531.16 | get yer baps oot,woor lass. | SUBURB::COOKS | | Tue Nov 27 1990 08:35 | 14 |
| When i`m out with my girlfriend,i`m always eyeing up the crumpet.
For some reason she doesn`t like this. Why not?
Mind you,if i saw her look at another bloke,i`d kick the blokes teeth
in.
Captain Headcase.
(yes,the same one - but please refrain from threats of dismemberment or
comments about my girlfriend looking like a plumbers bench.Just could
you give good reasoned auguments - like me.)
|
531.17 | | PEKING::BAKERT | Too HOT to handle,too COOL to be BLUE | Tue Nov 27 1990 08:38 | 11 |
| Alot of men can cause the womans insecurity by telling her that she is
too fat/too thin not enough/too much makeup etc etc...If they are not
happier with the girl they are seeing looks wise and forever trying to
change them , then wouldn't it be easier to just find another
girl...mind you they might not find another girl to put up with them..
This can work the other way around aswell , I ma not being sexist , but
it is more usual this way.
Tracie.
|
531.18 | | SUBURB::MURPHYK | This is Radio Clash | Tue Nov 27 1990 10:18 | 8 |
| Oi, Captain Headcase. Your girlfriend was giving me the eye last night
- what are you going to do about it.
I think it's very impolite to ogle someone else whilst out with your
boy/girlfriend.
Mind you, when I take a girl out, she finds it impossible to look at
another bloke, as she's transfixed by my stunningness.
Captain Shoulderbag.
|
531.19 | Give 'em some credit | SFCPMO::GUNDERSON | | Tue Nov 27 1990 10:31 | 19 |
| Re: .17
I agree with your comments to some extent - my almost ex-husband used
to always make comments about my figure......such as if he felt I was
gaining too much weight, he certainly had something to say and if I
was loosing too much weight, he also had a comment about that.....but
rarely did I get a "you look nice" comment from him and I work very
hard at running and playing racquetball to keep fit.....but on the
other hand, alot of times I would blow the comments off - I am who
I am and he was gonna have to learn to accept me.
However, I do not agree with this type of insecurity either from women.
Women tend to put themselves into this position....always asking for
comments from men about their appearence, etc. I do give men some
credit as I've seen many a good-looking men with not so attractive
women and it shows ya that those men see more than the outside.
-Lynn
|
531.20 | | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | another friend of Dr. Bob's | Tue Nov 27 1990 11:33 | 8 |
| RE: .8
>>1) The other person is their property and the sunset is public.
'Scuse me?!
E Grace
|
531.21 | | FORTY2::BOYES | NUTMEGS YOUR MAN! | Tue Nov 27 1990 11:41 | 6 |
| Re:-1, 8.
You can take it from me that the average tree doesn't care who looks at it:
sentient life forms might liked to be asked first.
Mister Incoherent.
|
531.22 | i like sponge,do you? | SUBURB::COOKS | | Tue Nov 27 1990 12:09 | 10 |
| Well i`m a tree,and i take great offence to that last comment.
What is sentient life form?
More to the point,why hasn`t anyone(apart from Captain shoulderbag)
taken great offence to note 17? I know that i have.
Captain Tree Like Person.
|
531.23 | | SFCPMO::GUNDERSON | | Tue Nov 27 1990 12:21 | 8 |
|
Re: 22
Well, don't take too much offense Capn' - tree's have a tendancy to get
up and "leaf" when they please (ha, ha)
-Lynn
|
531.24 | Property indeed! Why, I never....#$$^^@$%&# | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | another friend of Dr. Bob's | Tue Nov 27 1990 12:47 | 5 |
| RE: .21
That *wasn't* my point! I was upset about the property comment!
E Grace
|
531.25 | Yep: age 38 and STILL quoting Holden | SNIPER::HNELSON | Evolution in action | Tue Nov 27 1990 14:39 | 15 |
| I never understood the BENEFIT of ogling. Well, that is to say, of
course there is a certain appreciation for a certain form, the kind of
esthetic joy we take from Greek sculpture. I really do NOT enjoy,
however, the jerk-your-brainstem-by-the-hormones response which our
ancestors failed to select out, back when we were cruising on the great
plains with antelope thighbone in hand.
I have a minor lobe dedicated to averting my gaze from such folk, to
avoid the humiliation. (Was anyone else taken aback by Holden
Caulfield's observation that you can watch her brains leak down the
back of the seat, as you lie making out in his roommate's car?) It's
the same reflex that keeps me from peering in jewelry store windows
and Saab dealerships. Why want what you can't have?
- Hoyt
|
531.27 | little California | USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO | | Tue Nov 27 1990 22:55 | 5 |
|
This is all very interesting,but out here I don"t think this is
the situation.We don"t seem to have these particular hang ups.Just
saying Hi from California.
|
531.28 | I Drink 40 pints and smoke 60 tabs a day,son. | SUBURB::COOKS | | Wed Nov 28 1990 04:44 | 6 |
| Whats the crumpet like in California,then mate?
I hear you`ve got plenty of fit totty with big baps.
Captain Headcase.
|
531.29 | habeas corpus | FORTY2::BOYES | NUTMEGS YOUR MAN! | Wed Nov 28 1990 04:45 | 1 |
| Re:24 'their property' meaning them themselves being their own property.
|
531.30 | I wish they all could be Woodley Girls | SUBURB::MURPHYK | This is Radio Clash | Wed Nov 28 1990 06:37 | 2 |
| Re .28
You're out of order son. You can't beat Woodley girls.
|
531.31 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Wed Nov 28 1990 07:20 | 10 |
|
A few back there is a suggestion that "ogling" is a reaction that our ancestors
failed to "select out".
Surely however it is the opposite: checking out your surroundings ultra
carefully is a survival trait. Avert your gaze to avoid embarassment and you
might find that the passer-by's camouflage has worked and they have a knife in
your ribs and are making off with your possessions.
/. Ian .\
|
531.33 | | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | BLUSH | Wed Nov 28 1990 11:59 | 5 |
| RE: .29
Thank you
E Grace
|
531.34 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Wed Nov 28 1990 12:12 | 14 |
|
As moderator:
Please refrain from using words and labels that are insulting to groups
of people.
Also, if people from other cultures are recognizing words and
labels that are offensive to them, please let the moderators
know. Since all the moderators are American, we can't always
recognize local slang and whether it is devaluing or not.
Thanks.
--Gerry
|
531.35 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Total Eclipse of the Heart | Wed Nov 28 1990 16:34 | 7 |
| > .30
Have you ever been to California?
L.J.
|
531.36 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | I'm the Lord of the Wastelands | Thu Nov 29 1990 08:05 | 21 |
|
I had a female friend/best friend (can't really say that she
was my girlfriend although we were seeing eachother on a
regular basis) up until two weeks ago that used to ogle.
She'd stare `em down and then say something like `I think
you'ld look good in a suit like that' or some such thing. In
turn, I did the same with her and we both used to chuckle
about it together. We had faith in what we had and that's
all that mattered.
She was a woman I would've been proud to have as my life long
partner. There were NO inhibitions between us, since we were
both very much into eachother when we were together yet we
both gave eachother plenty of time to do the things we wanted
to with our own friends. I guess you could call it a casual
relationship, but with more feeling than just a casual fling.
It's just too bad that I found out that she was extremely
hung up on her ex-boyfriend, and now she's gone. :^(
Matt
|
531.37 | WHAT A LOVELY PEAR !! | BHUNA::PMOON | WOMEN ARE THE DAUGHTERS OF SATAN | Sun Dec 02 1990 17:26 | 6 |
| why not look at a thing of beauty,there are no laws(moral or
not)telling you what you can or cannot look at!!!!!
PETER.
|
531.38 | It's okay to look | BHUNA::GMITCHELL | West Cauther Juniors | Sun Dec 02 1990 19:41 | 4 |
| There's nothing wrong with looking at ladies, I think most women would
be (or should be) quite flattered when men admire there bodily
qualities.
|
531.39 | | NRUG::MARTIN | I know alllll about you! | Sun Dec 02 1990 21:09 | 2 |
| What with this being the 90's en all right last two? GAG!
Next youll be tellin us that they belong on the pedistal tah boot....
|
531.40 | No they won't!!!!!!! | BHUNA::JSALLY | SQF Morton Supporters Club | Sun Dec 02 1990 21:46 | 1 |
|
|
531.41 | ADMIRATION | PAKORA::PMOON | WOMEN ARE THE DAUGHTERS OF SATAN | Sun Dec 02 1990 21:59 | 1 |
| they are not objects to be stared at but people to be admired.
|
531.43 | | PEKING::BAKERT | Too HOT to handle,too COOL to be BLUE | Tue Dec 04 1990 10:01 | 6 |
| I'll admit I like it when men admire my body qualities , but only to
admiration level not "lets see how far I can undress this one with my
eyes" level...
tracie..
|
531.44 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Thu Jan 24 1991 21:13 | 4 |
| So I guess all you guys that think it's ok to "just look" don't mind being
scoped out by other men? After all, it's "just looking". Harmless, right?
-- Charles
|
531.45 | not in the shower | IMTDEV::BERRY | SONY makes great toys | Fri Jan 25 1991 04:47 | 1 |
|
|