T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
474.4 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | I'm not a fig plucker... | Wed Jul 11 1990 15:53 | 21 |
| If both of your names are on the lease, then legally YOU can be
held responsible for the entire payment (as can he) even if you
have already paid your half. If he goes bankrupt or disappears,
the landlord can come after you for the entire amount.
The guy sounds like a deadbeat, and he seems to be willing to
work beneath the law. (He is willing to bounce checks and run
from obligations.) Deal with him in the same manner. The first
time he falls behind and puts your name and credit in jeopardy,
get a half dozen friends to stop by, and collectively tell him
that he has 24 hours to vacate the apartment, or you and your
friends will do it for him. Forget about 30-day notices and all
that. Just kick him out. This will leave you solely responsible
for the apartment, and you will be burdened with finding a new
roommate. But I have seen "friendly" apartment-sharing
arrangements become entangled and messy. Get out of it early.
If he falls behind, the worst thing you can do is try to keep him
on until he gets paid up. The longer it drags out, the worse it
will get.
Joe Oppelt
|
474.5 | get him out now!!! | BPOV04::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Wed Jul 11 1990 16:45 | 31 |
|
I agree with -1. Get him out now. A similar situation happened to
me when I was in college. There were four of us sharing an apt with
all four names on the lease. One roomie was continually late with
rent and even missed a payment. We covered a few times, but got
fed up and contacted the landlord. He was really great about the
entire thing, and the three of us and he planned on taking the
situation into court. That was the only alternative we had at
the time becuase the roomie was not going to move out.
The landlord filed all the necessary papers for court and we
all went in. The three of us who had been paying each presented
cancelled checks to the mediator. The landlord told the mediator
that we were not at fault and that he did not want to hold us
responsible (even though legally he could). The outcome was
that the deadbeat payed up and left within a week. The three
of us found another roommate within two weeks which did not leave
any lapse in rent payment. It worked out well for all of us.
But the only reason it worked was becuase our landlord was willing
to work it out with us. Consequently we ended up staying with
that landlord for three years. I think good landlords are just
as hard to find as good tenants.
If your name is on the lease you are responsible for the rent,
regardless of if it is half or all. If I were you I would
start looking for another roommate, talk with your landlord,
and get the guy out of there. You will lose in the end if
you do not take action now.
|
474.6 | talk to your roommate, too | CADSYS::PSMITH | foop-shootin', flip city! | Wed Jul 11 1990 23:15 | 15 |
| Since the roommate's name's on the lease, the landlord might help. The
landlord could give both of you 30 days notice to leave, then sign you
back, alone, for the next month.
If the landlord won't help, it'll be a little harder, but still
possible.
One thing you might try is to level with your roommate. Say "With all
your boasting about bouncing checks and not paying rent at your old
place, I'm getting nervous. The first time you don't come up with the
rent on time or your check bounces, you're out of here, immediately."
Roommate problems can be awful. Good luck dealing with it...
Pam
|
474.7 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Jul 12 1990 11:03 | 2 |
| try cross-posting or reading TALLIS::REAL_ESTATE. I don't know how to
set it up for KP7
|
474.8 | FROM THE LITTLE CALIFORNIAN. | USWRSL::BOUCHER_RO | | Thu Jul 19 1990 00:45 | 16 |
|
If there is know getting around making getting a new roommate,yes
bye all means get rid of the problem.But do be careful on how the
matter is delt with.Finding some friends to help you move him out,
is definetly a little bet too crazy.If you where to step over this
line,this person would have anice little law soot of there own,
concerning private property,and there own rights.
This can be very touchy,trust me I know,last summer my too
roommate left me with a broken lease,and a damiged apartment.this
cost me a fortune,not too mention my pride.After there little boy
friends decided I was playing around with there ladys.And tryed
to putme in the hospital.Lucky for me,I,m quit good at defending
myself when my little world is in danger.Even if I tryed to us force
to move these indeviduals out,in this manner,in court its your word
agianst theres.BE CARFUL,THINK BEFORE YOU STRIKE.
|
474.9 | even if U R right, not always smart to take action | ULTRA::THIGPEN | You can't dance and stay uptight | Thu Jul 26 1990 11:06 | 30 |
| this discussion is a bit hard to follow... but I agree that you should
be careful how you proceed against any irrational person. I was in a
similar roommate situation once, long ago. There were 4 of us sharing
a house, 2 women, 2 men. One of the men was a crazy. Oh he was very
good at first impressions, but not good at sustaining them. The most
succinct description of him I can give is that he is the only person
that I can imagine recognizing, passed out drunk by the side of the road,
on my way home one night, and deliberately decided to leave there. I
wouldn't give a fig for my safety if I had stopped for him. Anyhow he
stiffed us for the last month's rent, and for a $200 phone bill
(collect calls in the dead of night from L.A., and his side of the
conversation goes like this: "yah, yah... what!?!?!? I'll *get* you
the money! Don't you threaten me, you ^$(@$." charming, no?). I
should add that this man was a Vietnam Vet, ex-Marine; that is, trained
by the best to be dangerous. (No, NOT crazy because a Vet; just
coincidence.)
When confronted by the other woman - she was impulsive - he chased her
out of the house screaming. She never came back. We used his security
deposit, and split the phone bill. Now, I have to admit that I'm a bit
dense in some situations; I ran into him on a campus bus and told him
out flat that he was a jerk to have done what he did. I used some
extremely colorful language in describing him and the medical condition
of certain of his body parts. He turned back from leaving the bus and
came down the aisle at me. Lucky for me, some small part of him
noticed that there were witnesses, so he stopped in time (phew!) and
cussed me out and left. Sheesh I can be dumb sometimes.
anyhow the point is to be rid of such a person, but don't forget to
consider your safety where dealings with any crazy person is concerned.
|
474.10 | Another bad rap for our servicemen? | IAMOK::MITCHELL | Heliophile Bathysiderodromophobe | Thu Jul 26 1990 12:24 | 17 |
|
> <<< Note 474.9 by ULTRA::THIGPEN "You can't dance and stay uptight" >>>
> should add that this man was a Vietnam Vet, ex-Marine; that is, trained
> by the best to be dangerous. (No, NOT crazy because a Vet; just
> coincidence.)
They why even bring up the fact that he was a Vietnam Vet or
a Marine, then?
Why do you say coincidence?
Explain please?
|
474.11 | No; give bad rap to the politicians, not Vets! | ULTRA::THIGPEN | You can't dance and stay uptight | Thu Jul 26 1990 14:44 | 11 |
| I put in the comment in parens specifically to try to avoid this kind
of misunderstanding... sorry if I was not clear.
I meant to point out that the crazy and the Vet do not go together by
definition; merely that in this particular case they occurred in the
same person.
My own opinion is that he started out crazy. I met his 16-year-old
little brother, whose idea of a good time was to go steal a Caddy from
the parking lot of an expensive restaurant. The crazy's opinion was,
'boys will be boys'.
|
474.12 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | Heliophile Bathysiderodromophobe | Fri Jul 27 1990 09:11 | 10 |
| re. .11 (Sara)
Thanks for the explanation and for the mail.
kits
|