T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
471.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Jun 29 1990 12:00 | 15 |
| You have a problem here.... You think there is too much furniture, he
doesn't. You think his furniture is "ratty" - he might consider this an
insult against him and his preferences. He apparently thinks the furniture
is fine.
The issue is not how to convince him to get rid of his furniture, but rather
how to work out amongst yourselves a mutually satisfactory solution. Maybe
it means you will decide you can live with the extra furniture. Maybe you'll
get rid of some of yours. Maybe he'll get rid of some of his. Don't discount
his feelings in this - he may be emotionally attached to certain pieces, and
may view your attempt to get rid of them as an attack on him.
What does he think of your furniture?
Steve
|
471.2 | | BPOV06::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Fri Jun 29 1990 12:16 | 42 |
|
Steve,
Actually the real issue is that he is afraid to get rid of it for
fear that we do not get married or do get married and split.
Then he will be stuck without any furniture. He has had
several bad relationships which has left him with a strong
mistrust of himself.
I refuse to get rid of my living room set because it is brand
new. That is not an issue with him. He helped me to pick
this furniture out when I was living alone. He does agree
that we have too much furniture.
We did work out a mutually satisfying solution which was to
have his friend take it to be donated to the shelter. He agreed
to it and we scheduled time to have it picked up. But he has
changed his mind.
Several of his friends have even made comment to him about what
to do with it. They all agree that it looks like hell, especially
since we have new furniture.
If I do compromise and take it with us it is only going to be put
in a cellar or something. I do not want our living room to continue
to look like a doctors office. Sure I can live with it, but not
next to the new furniture. It just doesnt work. We can't afford
to have any of it reupolstered either. I don't want to get stuck
in a situation with him that we are going to have to be lugging
around his old furniture every time we move. As it stands today
he has at least 4 pieces of furniture in the cellar that have
not been used in 3 years. I see no sense in bringing any of it
with us, but he wants to. To me if it has been sitting there for
three years with no use chances are we are not going to use it
in the new place.
I can't see any other ways of compromise on this. I guess what
I am asking for are creative ideas???
Michele
|
471.3 | Be gentle with him; see his side | SAGE::GODIN | Summertime an' the livin' is easy | Fri Jun 29 1990 12:31 | 14 |
| Could you rent a place with an extra room and use his furniture there
as a den/get-away place for him? That way he could keep the furniture,
but you wouldn't have to face it in your "living" area.
Re. its rattiness, perhaps the two of you could engender a bit of
teamwork over a common goal and learn how to refinish and reupholster?
It's not terribly hard, and can be really rewarding.
I guess I'm a bit more sympathetic with him and his concerns, having
also been a bit reluctant to give up "my" furniture for fear of having
to replace it if something didn't turn out the way I hoped it would.
Guess it's a bit like a security blanket for some of us.
Karen
|
471.4 | | DELREY::UCCI_SA | | Fri Jun 29 1990 12:31 | 12 |
| Michele,
You hit the nail on the head. The furniture is his security
blanket. DON'T take it away from him. What would you do if the
situation was reversed? Storing it in a cellar works fine (cover
it good with plastic). It will give him the security he needs
and it will keep it from cluttering up your rooms.
Maybe you can make a deal that if he gets rid of his stuff and
you two do break up, you'll give him half of your new stuff?
Sandie
|
471.5 | what to do with it isn't the issue... why he needs it is... | ROULET::DWEST | think globally, act locally... | Fri Jun 29 1990 12:41 | 35 |
|
i must confess that when i read your base note i kind of thought
that the underlying cause could be as you indicated in .2!!
how did i know? i'm on the other side of your coin... :^)
when i moved in with my SO, i too had furniture that would not be
used in our new place... i too heard about how ratty and ugly it
was... and most was put in the cellar for storage... some of my
"ratty old furniture" was used in the house (actually she was thankful
on a few occasions that we had two couches, even though one was
clearly in poorer shape)... some stashed downstairs...
was hanging onto my old furniture a "security blanket"? definitely...
as it turns out, it was a good thing i kept it... i'll be needing
when i move... :^(
i don't necessarily have any "creative ideas" for how to resolve
it... my recommendation would be to take the stuff and store it
in the cellar if you have to... small price to pay imho... i would
also suggest you talk about why he wants it there... in my case, like
his, a less-than-perfect past history made me want to keep it...
but i also knew that the re were issues/differences between us that
might lead to a parting of ways... the fact that he feels he needs it
may say something about how comfortable he is about your future
together... you might want to try and investigate why he feels he
needs it and, if he has specific issues that cause his uncertainty,
find out what they are and work on them...
if he feels he neeeds his stuff, let him keep it... why he needs
to keep it is a bigger issue though, than what to do with it...
if you do get married and/or he feels more secure in the relationship,
it will find it's own way out the door...
da ve
|
471.6 | Public Storage rooms??? | CSC32::D_LEWIS | I'd rather be in Jamaica, mon | Fri Jun 29 1990 12:59 | 7 |
| You might also want to look into a small storage room at one of the
Public Storage places. I don't know how large his stuff is, but if it
would fit in a 10x5 room it might be cheaper than trying to find a
place to live large enough to hold all of the combined stuff (or a
large enough basement).
Dave L.
|
471.7 | $25,000,000 and half of the kids | DFCON1::GRIFFIN | | Fri Jun 29 1990 14:38 | 7 |
| Aha! The answer is OBVIOUS! If he needs to keep the furniture for
"security", try a variation on the theme of pre-nuptial agreements.
Sign your furniture over to him, then you get to live with the stuff,
and he gets the security he needs in case the relationship doesn't work
out. If you're not willing to do that, one might guess that you have
concerns similar to his, and just happen to possess the material in
better condition.
|
471.8 | | HANNAH::MODICA | | Fri Jun 29 1990 14:45 | 8 |
|
The last two ideas are pretty good.
Although I'd go along with the storage, and to be fair, split the
costs.
Whatever, hope it works out.
Hank
|
471.9 | if it is that important then keep it | BPOV06::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Fri Jun 29 1990 14:52 | 25 |
|
re -1
I wouldnt have any objections to doing that if he would agree to get
rid of the old stuff. However, I seriously doubt that he would
go along with it.
I have no issue with security within myself. I am begining to take
issue with his lack of trust in himself on relationships. He and
I have a 4.5 year history. We lived together when we first started
dating, then he moved in with the mother of his kid to help raise
her. That only lasted a year and we have been together since then.
We did not stop our relationship during all of this, but it was
difficult at times. I think it really aggrivates me that he is
still hesitant about letting go of his fear. I keep telling him
that if I were going to leave him I would have done it a long
time ago. We plan on marrying, and I plan on sticking around.
If it is that important for him to keep the furniture then so be it.
I just don't want our house to look like a halfway house.
Thanks for helping,
Michele
|
471.10 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | the universe warps in upon itself | Sun Jul 01 1990 11:34 | 8 |
| When I "moved in" with someone, one set of furniture went home to
relatives for storage. So maybe you could see if any
relatives of yours or his have storage space, or could use it (like a
student or something who won't really need it forever), and you can
park it there, and know it's being treated fairly well by a relative,
and that its easily retrievable if necessary.....
-Jody
|
471.11 | We need our own space too! | ASABET::B_REILLY | | Sun Jul 01 1990 15:06 | 21 |
| If you moved in with him....What did you guys talk about before you
both decided to move in??? I know how he must feel...I had my own
stuff while my (now) wife and I lived together. She didn't like my
furniture at all. I had a KING size waterbed with Mirror head board
and padded rail( I was divorced at the time) but her Queen size had
matching dresser etc..so I sold mine..Same with my living room set.
and dining room table... BIG mistake.. although I like all the "NEW"
furniture we now have...it really wasn't "ME" I never thought it would
bother me (I felt it's only furniture buy what you like) WRONG....
I can only speak for myself.....but I think guys need that piece of
there past....What we did is put the stuff I like in a Den that is MY..
little place in the sun. I put anything I want in there ..I think
you should rent a place with a room in which he can put "HIS" things
LIKE OLD SHIRTS AND SNEAKERS somthing I just can't get rid off....
strange but true.
just my 2cents
Bob
|
471.12 | a final verdict | BPOV02::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Mon Jul 02 1990 10:58 | 39 |
|
re last two
I would love to be able to get a place with another room just for
him. But due to the current situation we have to provide three
bedrooms to pacify his ex. He is required by law to have
a separate bedroom for his daughter (who is with us usually
about once a month now). So right there he needs one for her
and one for him. To pacify his ex, we have agreed to have
another bedroom for me so that their daughter will not see us
sleeping in the same bed when she is with us. Sure that bothers
me, but there is no choice in the matter other than to move out.
As it stands we can barely afford a three bedroom apt. let alone
look for a fourth.
As for storing it at relatives or friends, all of his furniture
used to belong to his relatives and friends. He got all of the
stuff folks left behind or did not want to take with them
when they moved on. So there would be an issue with "giving
it back" if even for storage. My family simply does not
have any extra room to store some of the stuff. His dad is
selling the family house to move into a condo so that angle
is closed.
We discussed this over the weekend at great length. I honestly
did not fully comprehend his issue with security. I do not tie
any of my security with material possessions so it makes it that
much harder for me to understand his point of view. Regardless,
it looks like we will be moving all of the stuff and trying to
figure what to do with it once we get into the new apartment.
Thanks again,
Michele
|
471.13 | firmly hed personal opinion follows!! | ROULET::DWEST | think globally, act locally... | Mon Jul 02 1990 13:43 | 18 |
| granted this is a tangent but as far as the "three bedrooms to pacify
the ex" goes, well, i would be banned from all notes forever if
i stated my views on *that* one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
you have to live your lives for yourselves... the ex is an ex...
she shouldn't dictate what you two do in your home regardless of
whether or not his daughter visits!!!!!!! when i got divorced
my ex had the same excement in the agreement... basically it
said that all visits would be for me alone with NOONE else (she
was incredibly pissed that i was in another relationship right off)...
she has *no right* to make such a demand... she CANNOT use it as
a reason to deny or otherwise affect visitation either!!! it will
not wash in court, it shouldn't have to be an issue in your home...
tell the ex to shove it imho....
da ve
|
471.14 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Mon Jul 02 1990 13:54 | 7 |
| in re .12
do you have to keep the bedroom for the daughter just furnished
and set up for her? seems to me that you could keep some
of the furniture in there since she uses the room so seldom.
Bonnie
|
471.15 | | BPOV02::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Mon Jul 02 1990 15:52 | 36 |
|
re last two
Sure I think it stinks and I also think it is ridiculous that she can
share (yes thats right mom and kiddo in the same bedroom side by side)
a bedroom with the daughter while he has to provide her with her
own. But that is what his lawyer told me. Also, he wants to keep
it that way. We both believe that Erin should have a room of her
own because it is important for a child to have a special place.
Providing her with her own room is not an issue with us.
The real issue of the bedrooms is why we need another room. John
and I share the same room when she is not with us, but we each
have our own when she is with us. This is not my doing. He wants
it this way with his reasoning being that it would confuse Erin.
I say it is stupid to mislead her by changing our ways when she
is around. But I am not her parent and do not have a say in
how she is to be raised ( at least not until we are legally married).
Of course the ex demands it becuase that is just what she wants.
What really upsets me is that he thinks Erin does not suspect a
thing, but I know she is far to smart to not have picked up on it.
Even small things like little trinkets of mine she finds in "his"
room she will notice and comment on. To me it is only hurting her
by hiding the truth, but he sees it as protecting her. From what
I will never understand??? Hopefully this will not last much longer
though as I refuse to accept this once we become engaged.
Bonnie,
Some of the furniture is in her room. In fact there is a sleep sofa
in her room that she uses as her dollies bed. She loves it!!!
There isn't enough room to put anything else in there.
Mi
|
471.16 | | CUPMK::DROWNS | this has been a recording | Mon Jul 02 1990 16:11 | 2 |
|
How old is Erin?
|
471.17 | Some straight talk | SAGE::GODIN | Summertime an' the livin' is easy | Tue Jul 03 1990 09:48 | 29 |
| The following is offered to the base noter out of concern and with
the best intentions. Though it may sound harsh, these are the types
of things I wish someone had made me face before _my_ first marriage.
I'm hearing lots of conflict in your notes. Based on your presentation
of the two situations (disagreements over furniture and discontent over
the sleeping arrangements when Erin is around), I predict that there is
much more than furniture and bedrooms at stake here. It sounds like
you (as a couple) have some real conflicts over control, and at least
you (as an individual) have some expectations (realistic?) about how
things are going to change once you're married.
Hard and bitter experience has taught me that (1) conflicts before
marriage only get worse after marriage; and (2) if either of you expect
the situation or the individuals to magically change to suit your
expectations after the ceremony, you'll be disappointed.
Unless the two of you can work TOGETHER to iron out these issues to
your mutual satisfaction, I beg you to postpone formalizing your
relationship. Marriage is the joining of two individuals into one
unit. That doesn't mean that either person has to lose individual
identity, but it does mean that you're to begin working as one when it
comes to family matters. From the postings here, it appears that the
two of you are in opposite corners on some very basic issues.
It takes maturity to look beyond the "I wants" to reach the "we wills."
And it takes maturity to make a successful marriage.
Karen
|
471.18 | two different people who are very much alike | BPOV04::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Tue Jul 03 1990 10:18 | 41 |
|
re -1
Karen,
Thanks for your concern. Please don't be worried. We do not
plan on marrying for a minimum of two more years. We both
have lived together with each other before and it worked then.
But that was before he had a child. Of course now things
are a bit different. However, we both know that things are
not going to magically change and that through open and
honest communciation we can and will work on the differences
to arrive at mutually acceptable solutions.
We both happen to be two incredibly difficult people to live
with. Both of us were the "super achievers" in alcoholic
families. This helps in that we both know where to other
is coming from on most issues, but it hurts in a way due to
the control part of it. We are now really beginning a
compromise phase of our relationship, and we each know that
if we can not get through this part in one piece and stronger
than before we started going through it, then we will not have
a future together. But we are at times like two bulls in a china
cabinet, both butting heads. The fun part is learning how
to stop before bumping heads and sitting down and agreeing
on things or agreeing to disagree on things.
Again thanks for your concern,
Michele
We each have defined what we want from the relationship and from
each other. So there really are no unrealistic expectations
going into this. I learned a long time ago that he is no prince
in shining armor riding on a white horse coming to take me away
to never never land. And he has learned that I am not all smiles
and sweetness. We have a very strong union and hopefully it will
keep growing stronger.
|
471.19 | what a strange world we live in | BPOV04::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Tue Jul 03 1990 10:35 | 31 |
|
re 16
Erin is four. But honestly I fail to see what her age would have
to do with anything. But then again I am not a parent, and maybe
this is an issue I just can not identify with yet.
He feels it may confuse her, which it may very well. That is why
he wants to keep it as is. His stance on changing the situation
is that we will share the same bed in front of her once we get
married. I object, but am willing to go along with it becuase
it is something he feels will negatively impact Erin. I do not
want to hurt the child in any way. She is very precious to me
even though she is not my child. We have a great relationship.
So say in two years we do get married. Then she will be six.
Can a six year old comprehend what marriage means? I doubt it.
Isn't she going to be just as confused then? She knows that
mommy and daddy are never going to live together again.
And she only knows me in relation to John (that is that the only
time she is with me it is when she is with her daddy.) So she
relates to me as part of a unit which consists of him and I.
When she talks of mommy and daddy, my name is included
also. She often will refer to us at "daddy's family".
This certainly sounds like a note for the blended families
conference doesn't it??
Mi
|
471.20 | | MAMIE::SOULE | Pursuing Synergy... | Tue Jul 03 1990 10:41 | 12 |
| SAGE::GODIN
.17> Unless the two of you can work TOGETHER to iron out these issues to
.17> your mutual satisfaction, I beg you to postpone formalizing your
.17> relationship. Marriage is the joining of two individuals into one
.17> unit. That doesn't mean that either person has to lose individual
.17> identity, but it does mean that you're to begin working as one when it
.17> comes to family matters.
Karen,
All I will say is that your node is aptly named...
|
471.21 | All the best! | SAGE::GODIN | Summertime an' the livin' is easy | Tue Jul 03 1990 10:44 | 7 |
| Re. -.18
Mi, those are encouraging words, and help to counterbalance the less
positive feelings I was getting from your previous entries.
Best of luck to all three of you.
Karen
|
471.22 | Luck of the draw. | SAGE::GODIN | Summertime an' the livin' is easy | Tue Jul 03 1990 10:49 | 7 |
| re. -.20 (MAMIE::SOULE)
Well, sometimes our server puts me on NUTMEG. There are those who
would say that's appropriate, too.
Thanks for the compliment.
Karen
|
471.23 | Random thoughts.... | BETHE::LICEA_KANE | | Tue Jul 03 1990 22:29 | 61 |
| Ah, yes, furniture. At least both our tastes run for the "eclectic".
Good design is good design. Of course, most of the furniture was
furnished by the Liceas, with but a few spoons and forks and a pot
or two courtesy of the Kanes. (OK, I'll admit it. Even a couple
of dining utensils from the student union. Lock me up.)
Anyhow, my favorite piece from the Liceas was *easily* the
International Time Recording Company Clock that's now in our dining
room. That wasn't the dispute. It was the "lawn furniture" (aka
"Butterfly Chairs") in the living room. The covers had been replaced
several times. But the frames were smashed by a tree or two. Finally,
after much negotiation, perhaps I could keep them in the living room,
so long as the covers were replaced with leather.
Ah, a present to the rescue. The Liceas found a source in the city
for leather covers, just like the original. Thought we were all
set, but then one day one of the frames finally gave way. Either
too many trees or too many beers. Take your pick. But "sproiing".
And that chair was history.
Ever try to find *real* Butterfly Chair frames these days? Other than
spending your life in garage sales? Or finding a folding frame, which
I'm sorry to say, just don't cut the mustard with me? Thank god a
trip to Pittsburgh, and, amazing, a source in California for the
original frame. Found a local furniture store willing to "import" them
for us, *they* even payed for the shipping. Amazing.
The end of the story? Turns out the supplier in California is
supplying the "original" frames to Moma, the source in NYC is supplying
the leather covers. MOMA is charging $430.00 *each* for what we have
in our living room now for a fraction of the cost. But it's still
"lawn furniture". Oh well. *I* still love them.
On bedrooms. We've actually gotten far enough to think about beginning
to look for a house, and recently a friend was over talking about the
trials and tribulations of looking for a house. I was a bit puzzled,
since it sounded like they could afford a two bedroom house in several
locations in the area. Yeah, it might not be a *dream* house, but
what first house ever is? And of course most banks wouldn't be
too pleased to give a mortgage to two people who weren't *gasp*
married.
Well, I assumed that they only needed a two bedroom. One for them,
one for guests and/or a future kid(s), and all was set. But they
needed a three bedroom, one for them, one for "show", and one for
guests. It must have been a half hour before it dawned on me what
a "show" bedroom was. I mean, I figured, what, they aren't the neatest
people in the world, maybe they wanting a "living bedroom"?
OK, sometimes I'm slow. The SO's family knew what was up, *all* of
the siblings new what was up. But one of the *parents* didn't know
that they weren't living together, they were *living* together. OK,
maybe they *would* die if they ever found out, but it seemed like
quite the expense to take on, just to make one parent more comfortable.
Ah, the tyranny of "secrets".
Anyhow, sometimes you gottah do what you gottah do, even if it does
mean living in some far out 'burb, instead of where you want to live.
-mr. bill
|
471.24 | | MCIS2::WALTON | | Fri Jul 06 1990 11:10 | 23 |
| Michelle-
What a row to hoe!
I know of some of your problems with the ex (I read lots of notes!).
But everyone is fooling themselves if you think that Erin doesn't know
what is going on! She knows full well that something funny is going
on, and she will gradually mistrust both you and her father as the lie
is continued. I am seriously suspicious about the "bedroom" caveat in
the agreement, I think it might be time to invest a few dollars in a
question and answer period with another lawyer. If the "ex" has that
power, then I think you should have caveats dictating her social life
as well!!!!!
Anyway, back to the issue...a small self storage unit only runs about
30-50 bucks a month, seems like a reasonable solution to me.
The other noter was right, there are other "things" going on here.
Look carefully at them, you will need to have closure on them before
the relationship can grow.
Sue
|