T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
448.1 | Just some thoughts | OTOU01::BUCKLAND | and things were going so well... | Mon Apr 30 1990 15:29 | 19 |
| Perhaps many of us (the older ones at least) were brought up in a
"traditional" household. Ie, dad goes to work, mum may work outside
the house but still did all the "woman's" work. The guys that have
grown up with this would have established an uncocious pattern of
acceptance of the status quo.
When moving away from home to set up anew, there would be a tremendous
amount of inertia to prevent change from taking place. Maybe this is
why your boyfriend fell back so quickly into the old habits without
even realising it. It takes concious effort to change, and some
positive feedback and encouragement (often missing because we (men)
should be doing our share anyway - right).
If posive reinforcement is not there, or worse negative feedback is
(Why can't youy iron shirts properly, it's easy?) it's easy to give up.
Just some thoughts,
Bob
|
448.2 | Re: 0, Me thinks..... | ELWOOD::GROLEAU | Mine, is but to wonder why | Mon Apr 30 1990 16:27 | 6 |
| Often, we not only fall into a trap, we set one, knowing/unknowing it.
Be it what it may...........SHARE the load, one way or the outher.
Tis only FAIR.
Dan
|
448.3 | | USIV02::BROWN_RO | And the horse I rode in on | Mon Apr 30 1990 17:07 | 16 |
| Sounds like your boyfriend had a mom that did all these things for him,
and he equated being taken care of, with caring.
I've had two major live-together relationships where the WAY I cleaned
or washed, and WHAT I cleaned or washed was the cause of major
domestic battles. Being a man, I couldn't be expected to know the right
way to clean something. The problem is that everyone has different
standards, and different expectations, in this area, and they need to
be examined, and compromises must be struck. There is more than one
right way to do these things.
These two women, by the way, would certainly not agree with each other
on the way to do domestic chores.
-roger
|
448.4 | thanks for your input | GIAMEM::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Tue May 01 1990 09:15 | 29 |
|
Thanks to all of you for replying.
We both have learned many things since this situation has come about.
Mainly, that we both have different views on what is "clean". That
for me is a major problem, but it is my problem. When I was brought
up mom had a saying "if it can shine, it will shine". So it is
difficult at times accepting what he thinks is clean vs what I think
is clean. But we are working together to come to a "common" definition
of clean.
I also realize that I am up against his way of life. He was raised in
a house where mom took care of him and he basically did not do any
type of domestic chores. But when he left home he had to do all of
his own domestic chores. That was where one of the problems came
into play. I knew he knew how to do the chores, but couldnt figure
out why he wouldnt. Of course it is much easier to have someone
else do things if that person is willing to do so.
Re this issue of caring vs. being taken care of.
Thanks for the input. I now have a better understanding of men's
percepetions of "care". It certainly will help me understand his
equating being taken care of with caring about him.
Thanks
|
448.5 | puzzled and confused, need enlightenment.... | JURAN::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Tue May 01 1990 10:15 | 14 |
| ............ Being a man, I couldn't be expected to know the right
way to clean something. ...................
-roger,
This puzzles me. I don't understand what gender has to do with
knowing whether something is the right or wrong way. Could you
take the time to explain how this comes about?
Please and thank you.
justme....jacqui
|
448.6 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee | Tue May 01 1990 10:33 | 5 |
| re .5 [re .3]:
Seemed odd to me, too.
- M
|
448.7 | | CSG001::MEDEIROS | Value MY Difference | Tue May 01 1990 11:24 | 37 |
|
Re .5, .6 (re .3):
I can't speak for Roger, but his comments made perfect sense
to me.
Some things I learned from my own domestic situation: Did you
know that if you load a dishwasher front-to-back, that's the wrong
way to do it? The right way is to load it from the back first,
and work your way up to the front. And when cleaning, you have
to dust first and THEN vacuum, never vacuum first and then dust.
(the logic behind this one has something to do with not getting
the dust from furniture onto a freshly vacuumed rug). And if you
put leftovers away in the refrigerator, the correct covering is
ALWAYS clear plastic wrap, NEVER aluminum foil. And glasses must
ALWAYS be put away upside-down in the cabinets. And so on and so
on - I could give you dozens of examples of the "right" way to
iron shirts, fold towels, wash floors, store food in the freezer,
etc. from various women I've dealt with, many of them contradictory.
(My current SO says that you have to vacuum first and then dust,
because the vacuum cleaner kicks up a lot of dust that then has
to be dusted off the furniture).
Without going into generalizations, I can make some of my own
observations: I'm fairly easy-going about the way I do domestic
chores, but the women I've been involved with generally were not,
and their attitude was one of "this is the way Mom taught me to
do housework, so it's the right way - yours is wrong" (see .4);
I've had to try very hard to keep from getting into the "if you're
the only one who knows how to do this right, then do it yourself"
trap; and in situations where I've gotten involved with major
quarrels over domestic chores, there was generally something much
more serious wrong with the relationship, and the fighting over
chores (who does them, or how) arose because we really just wanted
to fight with each other, and housework provided a convenient
vehicle for venting frustration and irritation with each other.
|
448.8 | A Few Questions, first | SLSTRN::RONDINA | | Tue May 01 1990 11:57 | 42 |
| At the risk of really getting scourched on this one, I will
nevertheless enter my 2 cents on why I (and other men too) have a hard
time with "housework."
First, I have heard it told that women see their domiciles (houses or
apartments) as extensions of themselves, as a reflection on their
personhood. I have asked me wife if that is true and so says she. Men
perhaps do not hold such a thing. I know I don't. My house is where I
eat, sleep, relax, etc. It is not an extension of myself. My view of
housework is that it is a necessary evil. As for maintaining the
house, clean is good enough for me, spic and span is definitely out -
takes too much time when I would rather be doing other things.
Recently my wife took a trip and I became a "single parent" for my
large family (8 kids). I learned how difficult it is to hold down a job
and take care of a family also. During the three weeks, I streamlined
everything from shopping, to cleaning (close off rooms you never use),
to decorating (take down all those wall hangings, gee gaws, pictures,
figurines 'cuz they need dusting). My considerations were: Are we
eating right, do we have clean clothes, is the house environmentally
safe? If yes, then we were alright. Forget all the rest, like do the
towels match, do the curtains need cleaning, should I rearrange
furniture and knick knacks.
I admit that I am one of those men who was raised in the European
style where "males do men work and women do women's work". Never made
a bed until I got married! So, yes I certainly had to re think the
division of labor. However, my wife is a full time mother and home
maker, so for the most part she has her work and I have mine. My
question though is as women now ask men to share in the house work, do
men ask women to share in their work requirements/activities? Do
women today feel that they should also be responsible for car
maintenance and repairs, cutting grass, removing trees and shrubs,
fertilizing lawns, taking out a wall, putting in or fixing plumbing and
electrical stuff, going to the dump, coaching a team, doing scout
things, etc.? Are women today expecting men to pick up their share of
what was previously called "woman's work", yet quite content to let the
men continue doing the "men's work"? In my household my wife also does
her share of "men's work".
I am willing to learn in this are, so would appreciate other opinions.
|
448.9 | re-iterating.... | JURAN::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Tue May 01 1990 12:36 | 35 |
| >
I admit that I am one of those men who was raised in the European
style where "males do men work and women do women's work". Never made
a bed until I got married! So, yes I certainly had to re think the
division of labor. However, my wife is a full time mother and home
maker, so for the most part she has her work and I have mine. My
question though is as women now ask men to share in the house work, do
men ask women to share in their work requirements/activities? Do
women today feel that they should also be responsible for car
maintenance and repairs, cutting grass, removing trees and shrubs,
fertilizing lawns, taking out a wall, putting in or fixing plumbing and
electrical stuff, going to the dump, coaching a team, doing scout
things, etc.? Are women today expecting men to pick up their share of
what was previously called "woman's work", yet quite content to let the
men continue doing the "men's work"? In my household my wife also does
her share of "men's work".
>
I must say that mowing the lawn, taking the trash out, etc.... do not
have the exclusivity (???word???) of being genderized. I have seen
these types of work done for close to half a century by both males and
females equally. Neither gender has the handle on what is the "right"
or "only" way of doing these tasks. I have had the opportunity myself
of participating in many of these tasks....guess what? They get done
without the world falling apart because the "wrong" gender just happened
to be the one doing them!!!
My question remains.....why is the gender of the person doing the task
the basis for deliniately whether the task gets done in the "right"
manner or the "wrong" manner? Isn't it more important that the task
get done if it really needs to be done???
justme....jacqui
|
448.10 | | USIV02::BROWN_RO | And the horse I rode in on | Tue May 01 1990 13:00 | 37 |
| Great examples in .7!
> <<< Note 448.5 by JURAN::GARDNER "justme....jacqui" >>>
>> -< puzzled and confused, need enlightenment.... >-
>>............ Being a man, I couldn't be expected to know the right
>>way to clean something. ...................
>>-roger,
>This puzzles me. I don't understand what gender has to do with
>knowing whether something is the right or wrong way. Could you
>take the time to explain how this comes about?
It doesn't, Jacki. This was the attitude that I encountered in both
of these women, was that my opinion was to be disregarded because I was
male, and men don't know about these housework things. This is their
bias, not mine.
There is no right way. There is only what is comfortable for the
individuals involved.
With my current girlfriend, it came from her grandmother, that this is
the way one should "keep house", and that there were no excuses not
to do it. This method of keeping house was only practical if you didn't
work outside the home, because to do the job right involved enormous
amounts of labor.
I come from a very casual household in regards to things being neat
and tidy; as long as things were clean in a very general sort of way,
that was o.k.
-roger
|
448.11 | | SALEM::KUPTON | I Love Being a Turtle!!! | Tue May 01 1990 15:21 | 24 |
| I think that the reply stating that the home is a reflection
or extension of the female head of the domicile is a pretty accurate
one.
I've been married to the same woman for 16 years. We've always
been pretty good about the sharing of duties. For a few years she
never did a load of laundry. Every Wednesday I'd get $10 in quarters
and pick up 5-6 baskets (she had separated) of dirty clothes and
head out to the 'mat. I'd wash, dry, fold, and hang everything and
return home where a meal awaited me. My wife ran a daycare (8 kids)
in our house so she was not just a homemaker. I always did any repairs
to plumbing and electrical stuff, autos, and I did the general home
and yard maint. This still holds true today. Now she has a position
as an ass't manager at Shaw's. We share much of the housework. I
don't do wallpapering (I go to the movies), I don't do decorating.
BUT......we know when to help each other. Even if it's only to steady
the ladder or get a towel.
Ken
BTW....She does all work on the house that has to be done on the
roof or from a ladder at a height greater than 12'. 8^)Acrophobic(^8
|
448.12 | | ULYSSE::SOULARD | THIERRY SOULARD - VALBONNE | Wed May 02 1990 10:35 | 22 |
| I has always seen my parents working together and sharing the house work.
They wanted that we could do everything in the house. So I can do everything
except knitting.
It was very useful to be able to manage the complete home work when I lived
alone.
Now I am living with my wife, we share everything, both are working outside
and the house work is done depending of the time we have.
I know that she would not accept doing everything in the house.
And when she hears her friends who complain because they are doing everything,
she always answer :
"You have got the man "boyfriend" you deserve"
I think she is right.
When you accept a situation at the beginning, then you don't have to complain
afterwards.
I think that if everything must be clear when the couple start to live together.
It was so with my parents, it is so for me now, and I think everything is OK.
I know a lot of young couple in FRANCE who are living as we do.
Are the US men more machist than the french one?
THIERRY
|
448.13 | "Patterns" | VCSESU::KINNEY | | Wed May 02 1990 13:23 | 55 |
| I have a poem for everyone to read entitled "Patterns" taken from a
book entitled "Is This Where I Was Going?" by Natasha Josefowitz.
Patterns
Instead of minimizing our differences,
let us maximize them
Instead of denying that you are better at this
and I am better at that,
let us take full advantage of our special skills
and recognize the weaknesses
in order either to work on them
or to turn to what we do best
It is OK with me
that most men have better spatial skills
and that most women are better at verbal skills
I can accept that most men are more concerned with
objects
and most women with people
That boys excel at gross motor coordination
and girls at manual dexterity
That males are good at problem-solving
and females process information faster
I like our differences!
As you shovel the driveway
I fix you hot soup
As you drive at night
I keep you awake
As you carry the suitcases
I check in at the counter
You figure our taxes
I decide on our budget
You vacuum
I dust
You turn the mattress over
I water the plants
You chop the onions
I add the spices
You go marketing ...
but with my shopping list
You buy me books
I buy you ties
You know how to cure the ills of the world
I know how to cure your ills
Yu know what the children ought to do
I know how they are
Yu know about driving in the snow
I know you should wear a scarf
You show me how much you love me
I tell it to you
I could not do well what you do so well
nor could you do what I do
I like me as me
and you as you.
|
448.14 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | pools of quiet fire... | Wed May 02 1990 14:30 | 10 |
| re: .13
my first response is that it sounds like the generic standard-issue
cookie-cutter american family....how does that maximize the differences
if people don't want to do the things in their presupposed pattern?
Don't get me wrong, I think it's a good poem, it may not be provoking
my thoughts in the direction you intended, though....
-Jody
|
448.15 | stereotypes are not "OK by me". | COBWEB::SWALKER | Sharon Walker | Wed May 02 1990 16:30 | 49 |
|
Jody, that was my first reaction too. While the concept of
"maximizing differences" may be good in principle, I felt
that this poem sought to do that through the application
of traditional stereotypes. Frankly, I was disappointed.
The following lines bothered me most... not only are several
stereotypes recounted as fact, but the author starts the
phrase with "it is OK with me". To me, the fact that the
stereotypes are OK with her is less meaningful than if she
had simply recanted the differences between 2 people on a
personal level: you're better at fixing cars, and I'm better
at electrical wiring; I'm faster at changing the cat litter,
but you make better waffles (for example)... and said THAT
was OK with her.
> It is OK with me
> that most men have better spatial skills
> and that most women are better at verbal skills
> I can accept that most men are more concerned with
> objects
> and most women with people
> That boys excel at gross motor coordination
> and girls at manual dexterity
> That males are good at problem-solving
> and females process information faster
"But," you may say, "that's *not* how she divides things!
He does the shopping! She does the budget!" Okay. But
the line right after the ones I just quoted is
> I like our differences!
To me, this implies that she is drawing parallels to the
platitudes she cited. And I see no direct contradictions
in the division of labor she describes.
So what if "most men have better spatial skills"??? What does
that have to do with _our_ differences on a two-by-two basis?
Nothing, that's what. Does "maximizing differences" for mutual
advantage really mean dividing labor by highlighting perceived
gender differences across society, or does it mean taking
stock of individual strengths and dividing tasks accordingly?
That's a rhetorical question, of course ;-).
Sharon
|
448.16 | The dreaded Me Too flu | STAR::RDAVIS | You can lose slower | Thu May 03 1990 11:52 | 9 |
| � <<< Note 448.15 by COBWEB::SWALKER "Sharon Walker" >>>
� -< stereotypes are not "OK by me". >-
It is OK with me
that you wrote my intended reply
better than I would have written it.
(: >,)
Ray
|
448.17 | I'd probably say the same thing in the kitchen | XCUSME::KOSKI | This NOTE's for you | Fri May 04 1990 12:27 | 17 |
| this talk of men's role, woman's role, reminds me of an incident
that happened to me. A while ago the radiator hose on my car split.
I was only about a mile from my house. I assessed the damage and
decided to walk to the shopping plaza, bought electrical tape and
anti-freeze, patched the hose, refilled the anti freeze and continued
on to my SO's house. Upon arriving in his driveway the patch gave
way. I was please with myself that I was able to make the temporary
fix. When I told Mike about the situation he started in that *he'd*
call around to the auto shops the next day and that he'd fix it
for me. I was some what taken aback because at first it sounded
like he felt he had to fix it for me. I didn't get on his case I just
said, "that's OK I can take care of it" , "oh, I know that" he said,
"I want to do it for you" (he missed the days he used to work on cars in
the yard). I said in a firm but light hearted voice "OK you can fix
my car, as long as you know I could too!" Compromises 8^)
Gail
|
448.18 | Yes, but WHOSE stereotypes? | FENNEL::GODIN | You an' me, we sweat an' strain. | Thu May 10 1990 16:47 | 9 |
| re. those of you who thing .13 is too stereotypial -- I don't see any
mention in the poem of the gender of the "you" or of the "me." Yet at
least two readers have presumed the "you" is male and the "me" is
female.
Try reading it with you presupposed gender roles switched. Do you
still have difficulty with it?
Karen
|
448.19 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | You go first -- after me. | Thu May 10 1990 16:54 | 14 |
| re .18
Good point, but I'd have to say that it is at least "clearly
implicit" that "you" is the male and "I" is the female. The
beginning of the poem directly distinguishes between male
and female. The first line of each comparison is always a male
trait, and the second is female.
Then the "You"s and "I"s follow, with the stereotypical male
feature always preceding the stereotypical female trait.
An interesting exercise nonetheless.
Joe Oppelt
|