T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
413.1 | Not worth going back to | MILKWY::BUSHEE | Living on Blues Power | Mon Feb 12 1990 10:31 | 6 |
|
My opinion would be to write this place off!!
I will not enter a place that has such a dress code. Does someone
wearing a tie make them any better person than one not? Not in my
books. Just another yuppie elitest snob-hole.
|
413.2 | | CONURE::AMARTIN | Teenage Mutant brat pukes! | Mon Feb 12 1990 11:50 | 4 |
| Hmmm what do they require the ladies to wear? A dress??
I agree, write this place off....
|
413.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Feb 12 1990 12:45 | 10 |
| I too have been annoyed at the hypocrisy of restaurants with dress codes.
I once went to a restaurant in Boston in the company of another man and two
women. I was dressed in dress slacks, shirt and shoes - indeed, I had been
wearing a jacket and tie earlier that day. I was told I needed to have a
jacket, and was given a "house jacket" (four sizes too small) which I could
wear to the table and then hang on the chair. The two women in my party were
wearing grubby jeans, sweatshirts and sneakers, and nary a peep about their
attire. I would not willingly return to that restaurant.
Steve
|
413.4 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Feb 12 1990 12:49 | 10 |
| Then again, there's the restaurant I was taken to near Denver (a big
steak house, can someone help me with the name?), that if you wore a tie,
you were given two choices - you could take it off voluntarily or they would
snip it off with scissors, parade it around the restaurant with bells ringing,
and would hang it on the wall for all to see. If you chose the latter path,
you get a free drink as compensation. I was told that it is a ritual to
go there wearing the ugliest tie you can find, and people have indeed
found some TRULY ugly ones, based on the wall display.
Steve
|
413.5 | not my cup of tea | BLITZN::BERRY | Send me to a McCartney concert. | Mon Feb 12 1990 13:54 | 18 |
| I agree with the previous notes.... drop'em. I use to have mixed feelings
about this issue, and I use to enjoy wearing ties. I have a drawn full that I
don't pull on any more. One day, I'll have a garage tie sale....
Today I enjoy the casual look much more. Nice casual... that is. I feel
"stuffy" wearing something formal like a tight collar, tie, etc., and I prefer
a loose jacket, sleeves rolled back, nice slacks, and a casual shirt, probably
a pastel or black tee shirt, (BVD style), and then I feel right at home.
Requiring ties is 'old fashioned, yuppie trended, and snobish.' We may all be
in some type of "group" but the yuppie scene floors me! The only good yuppie
is a ......
-dwight
PS: Steve, I don't see how you could dine there that time! Wearing a silly,
small, jacket to a table, just to hang it on a chair! I hate that kind of
control.
|
413.6 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Feb 12 1990 14:47 | 6 |
| I happen to enjoy dressing up and wearing a jacket and tie, and will usually
do so if I'm going somewhere where it seems appropriate. What I don't like
is being told I HAVE to wear a tie or jacket just from some phony sense
of propriety.
Steve
|
413.7 | | MANIC::THIBAULT | Crazy little Ship of Fools | Mon Feb 12 1990 15:38 | 11 |
| re: <<< Note 413.4 by QUARK::LIONEL "Free advice is worth every cent" >>>
Steve's story of the Denver restaurant reminds me of my friend's bar back
home. Some guy came in wearing an alligator shirt and my friend (the bartender)
promptly bit it off before she would serve him :-).
Personally I wouldn't go near a place that wouldn't serve anyone that was
wearing jeans or whatever. I've always thought that ties should be banned
anyway...silly things.
Jenna
|
413.8 | | CREPES::GOODWIN | Toilets? In hell? It IS damnation with NO relief | Tue Feb 13 1990 11:52 | 8 |
| I went to a hotel where a friend from Holland was staying in; this was
a 'chain' hotel, one of the more well known names - also this is in
England. I turned up in jeans and a shirt - it took a while to explain
I was only meeting someone, and not trying to use the hotel's bar.
Sheesh!!!
Pete.
|
413.9 | | WHRFRT::WHITE | I'll get up and fly away... | Tue Feb 13 1990 12:01 | 10 |
|
Re: < Note 413.4 by QUARK::LIONEL "Free advice is worth every cent" >
>Then again, there's the restaurant I was taken to near Denver (a big
>steak house, can someone help me with the name?), that if you wore a tie,
>you were given two choices - you could take it off voluntarily or they would
>snip it off with scissors...
Are you thinking of the Pinnacle Peak Patio outside of Phoenix, Arizona?
|
413.10 | headeaches and ties | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Tue Feb 13 1990 12:12 | 8 |
| If someone gets a headache while wearing a tie chances are that the
shirt is at fault. Most men will only button the top button if they
are wearing a tie. Ties are very easily lossened if too tight but
buttons are binary. I'm careful to only wear ties with shirts that
fit well around the neck (I have a good sized neck for my body so
have to watch it.)
Alfred
|
413.11 | | DECXPS::HENDERSON | seems a common way to go | Tue Feb 13 1990 12:43 | 16 |
|
RE:< Note 413.9 by WHRFRT::WHITE "I'll get up and fly away..." >
>Are you thinking of the Pinnacle Peak Patio outside of Phoenix, Arizona?
Bob, as I recall there are a couple of places in Colorado that follow the
tradition of the Pinnacle Peak Patio..We used to patronize one in Colorado
Springs, but I'll be darned if I can remember the name of the place..
Jim
|
413.12 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Feb 13 1990 14:43 | 5 |
| I believe the name of the steak house was the Traildust. The one I went
to was just outside of Denver. I may get disoriented, but I don't think
I'd confuse Denver with Phoenix!
Steve
|
413.13 | Thats right | COMET::DONOVAN | | Tue Feb 13 1990 14:49 | 8 |
|
It was the Trail dust steak house which was a chain atleast
here in Colo.The food was not good, in my opinion,and the
the adds they ran on Tv were obnoxshis(sp).Maybe that is why
their out of business.
Later Donovan
|
413.14 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Feb 13 1990 15:35 | 5 |
| Re: .13
They seemed mighty popular when I was there last spring...
Steve
|
413.15 | Went back to see mgr. | SALEM::MELANSON | nut at work | Wed Feb 14 1990 13:13 | 6 |
| I went back there to see the manager, he explained the rule was
to keep the "riff-raff" out....and he was sorry that the rule
was misunderstood.
jim
|
413.16 | lame excuse | BLITZN::BERRY | Send me to a McCartney concert. | Thu Feb 15 1990 05:00 | 5 |
|
I object to being termed "riff-raff." :^)
|
413.17 | | SUBURB::PULLANR | Process hibernating | Thu Feb 15 1990 07:31 | 4 |
| What about the "Riff-Raff" who wear ties?
Richard.
|
413.18 | | LYRIC::BOBBITT | there's heat beneath your winter | Thu Feb 15 1990 10:06 | 7 |
| They should always be accompanied by two domestics named "Magenta" and
"Columbia"?
;)
-Jody
|
413.20 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Feb 15 1990 11:28 | 3 |
| Darn, Jody beat me to it.... Just don't go looking like "Eddie".
Steve
|
413.21 | obscure movie reference.... | LYRIC::BOBBITT | there's heat beneath your winter | Thu Feb 15 1990 13:53 | 7 |
| "Oh no! Meatloaf AGAIN?!"
sorry, I'll stop now....
-Jody
|
413.22 | TIE SHOULD MATCH THE SHIRT AND THE SUIT | COMET::BEYZAVI | | Fri Feb 16 1990 10:47 | 5 |
| I have seen some men wearing their suit without a tie in formal places.
Some times it is hard to find the tie that matches the shirt and the
suit.
If the top button is button up, would that serve the purpose?
|
413.24 | dressing up is nice | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Mon Feb 19 1990 09:27 | 17 |
| I went to the Trail Dust Steak house in Dallas; apparently it's
the original restaurant which grew to a chain because of the
popularity of its no-ties-allowed game. The wall was papered with
tie ends, mostly accompanied by IBM business cards.
We noticed that women's suit scarves, which function as ties,
weren't cut off; all four of us were wearing such scarves and
attracted no notice.
On the original topic -- I like going to dress-up restaurants once
in a while. We went to Levi Lowell's in Merrimack for Valentine's
dinner and it was nice. Day in day out I prefer casual nice, but
life's a lot nicer and richer for me if it's got some special
moments that take work and preparation. If it's all on the same
"ok" level, I lose both the high spots and the lows or relaxation.
--bonnie
|
413.25 | my Valentine had a red tie | XCUSME::KOSKI | This NOTE's for you | Mon Feb 19 1990 11:03 | 7 |
| > We went to Levi Lowell's in Merrimack for Valentine's
> dinner and it was nice
Hey I was there too, only half the men there had ties/coats on.
But that didn't really have any effect on my rating the restaurant
Gail
|
413.26 | hm, interesting | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Thu Feb 22 1990 16:26 | 12 |
| re: .25
Really? Which room were you in?
We were in the back room with the gas fireplace, and every man I
could see had a suit and tie -- though some removed the jacket as
soon as they sat down. I don't know that Levi Lowell's actually
requires a tie as long as you're dressed nicely. I think they'd
be more likely to refuse service to a woman in ripped high-fashion
jeans than to a man in nice slacks and a sweater.
--bonnie
|
413.27 | Dont worry be happy | SUBWAY::SCHULMAN | | Thu Feb 22 1990 16:56 | 9 |
| Its OK with me if resturants require a tie, actually my wife would
probably like that idea, she's always trying to get me to dress up.
I just don't go to them.
What about the crack about Yuppies and ties. Yuppies don't wear ties
and they don't go to resturants to eat, they go to dine and then they
buy the place if they like it, and further more they go in Docksiders.
|
413.28 | Tie at the Ritz | PULSAR::FAMULARO | Joe MS:ZKO2-2P10 DTN381-2565 | Sun Feb 25 1990 15:35 | 22 |
| Thought I'd share a tie experience of several years ago, one I'll not
forget...
Ritz Carlton dining room at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Boston. We were
a group of four couples, one of the gents happened to be wearing a
turtle neck shirt and sport coat. He looked very well dressed (not a
cheap shirt and jacket by any means). As we approached the dining room
the host informed him that without a tie he could not be seated but the
hotel would be happy to provide a tie for him. Great! A tie with a
turtle neck shirt. No problem. My friend took the tie and put it on.
We were seated. I looked up from my menu and it appeared Ben was no
longer wearing the tie. This happened to catch the attention of the host
who promptly walked over and reminded Ben of the rules of the house.
"But Sir", says Ben, "I am wearing the tie." At that Ben stands up,
places his back to the host and shows how he's turned the tie around
so that it is hidden under the turtle neck and down the back of his
sports coat. "Sir, I have complied with your rules, I am wearing a tie
in the fashion which I am accustomed when also wearing a turtle neck
shirt. Kindly permit my friends and I to dine uninterrupted for the rest
of the evening". And dine we did.
|
413.29 | A not-Tie story | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Sun Feb 25 1990 16:16 | 15 |
| .28 reminds of of a neighbor when I was a kid in Chicago years back. A
late teenage "punk" who pretended to be interested in nothing but
working on old junk cars. But his family's more intellectual heretige
was betrayed in some obscure insights he had gained. Illinois law
required that all road cars have emergency brakes, rear-view mirrors,
windshield wipers, and the like. But it was a little vague on some of
the details. So often to be found on the back seat of his vehicles (or
the floor, if there was no back seat) were: emergency brake, rear-view
mirror, windshield wiper, etc. He also carried a copy of the law, so
he could prove to the men in blue (and they were all men, then) that
there was no requirement that these items be installed and functional.
So, I suppose you could tie your tie around . . . well, any part of
your person that you would care to.
- Bruce
|
413.30 | Sounds Good to Me | MSCSSE::LENNARD | | Mon Feb 26 1990 14:34 | 12 |
| If you make reservations at the Stonehedge you are told about their
dress code.
When I go out to dine, as differentiated from just plain putting on the
feed bag somewhere, I am very glad to see dress codes enforced,
including ties. Dining out is a special occasion for my wife and I,
and I don't want it ruined by Yahoo's. That little bit of selectivity
on the part of management also tends to keep out people who would be
undesirable for other reasons.
I'm glad there are a few islands of good taste where standards are
still enforced...Our society could use a lot more of the same.
|
413.31 | Doesn't sound good to me... | SMURF::PARADIS | Worshipper of Bacchus | Mon Feb 26 1990 14:53 | 24 |
| Re: .30
> Dining out is a special occasion for my wife and I, and I don't
> want it ruined by Yahoo's.
Well, the point that you and an awful lot of snooty maitre-d's
seem to miss is that dress is by NO means a measure of Yahoo-ness.
I've been to plenty of dining establishments where the properly
attired folks at the next table were being loud, rude, and
obnoxious after having sampled too liberally of the establishment's
wine cellar.
I, for one, always try to carry myself with a level of dignity
suitable to my surroundings, regardless of my manner of dress.
And that's the point a lot of people are trying to make: I am
exactly the same person whether I'm wearing black tie or tie-dye.
[actually, I've raised more than a few eyebrows by going to the
opposite extreme... if I'm hungry after a symphony gig, I'll go
out to some hole-in-the-wall without changing out of my tux...
Nobody's thrown me out yet for inappropriate dress 8-) ]
--jim
|
413.32 | HOW THEN? | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Grail seeker | Tue Feb 27 1990 08:20 | 16 |
|
Re: .30/.31
OK - if dress code is an unfair way of trying to prevent "Yahoo-ness"
in restaurants (which, I assume, we all deplore)....what would be
a fairer way of assessing people for entry?
Do we simply trust in others to behave as we would?
- I've had many an expensive meal ruined by that assumption....
Should restaurants refuse to book groups of over a certain number?
- Especially around Christmas?
- Or refuse block company bookings?
'gail
|
413.33 | wear a tie on a weekend ? HA !!!!! | BUFFER::PCORMIER | The more laws, the less justice | Tue Feb 27 1990 08:44 | 13 |
| RE: .32 Why do you think enforcing a snooty dress code will guarantee
that all who enter a restaurant will behave like perfect ladies and
gentlemen ??? Do ties, suitcoats, and fancy dresses contain hidden
compartments of good-behavior medicine ? :-}
You sound like you've never seen a completely obnoxious, loud
(and usually a bit over .10) person in a suit coat and tie (or fancy
dress if it's a woman). Clothes do not dictate behavior, in my opinion.
Paul C.
|
413.35 | mak'em wear signs | DEC25::BERRY | Send me to a McCartney concert. | Tue Feb 27 1990 17:06 | 21 |
| re: .32 [yuppy::daviesa]
>>>OK - if dress code is an unfair way of trying to prevent "Yahoo-ness" in
restaurants (which, I assume, we all deplore)....what would be a fairer way of
assessing people for entry?
Check for dirt under their finger nails.
Check for stains in their shorts.
Check their socks for "smell."
Check for nose hairs.
Check their wallets for used rubbers.
Check their node names for "yuppy"
Check their music taste by playing the "Stones" and watch their reactions.
>>>Do we simply trust in others to behave as we would?
How do we know how you'll behave?? Should you be trusted??
The question deserves the answers.
-dwight
|
413.36 | | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Grail seeker | Wed Feb 28 1990 08:22 | 20 |
|
Re .34
"You can usually get well-behaved clientele by charging outrageous
prices for the meals"
Mike - that's the same rule that says that those who can afford
to dress well will behave sociably. i.e. assuming that money = manners.
Re .35
Fair point Dwight.
I was assuming that "we" are the anti-Yahoo people who, realising
the impact of that behaviour in restaurants, wouldn't do it ourselves.
And therfore trusting that others would behave as "we" do means
trusting that others wouldn't Yahoo where we had paid to eat.
'gail
|
413.37 | Or, I Could Use The Tie Rather Than the Tablecloth | FDCV01::ROSS | | Wed Feb 28 1990 10:40 | 9 |
| Hell, I don't care if a restaurant wants me to wear a tie.
So long as I can pick my nose, wipe the results on the tablecloth,
and, in my state of extreme flatulence after the onion soup, let out
a few good ones, I'm happy.
I'm one classy guy, tie or no tie. :-)
Alan
|
413.39 | OH.... | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Grail seeker | Mon Mar 05 1990 08:26 | 14 |
|
Re .38
Shucks Mike - my ignorance is showing.
Honestly - I've never been into a place with a dresscode here in
the UK where they lend those items. You either turn up wearing them,
or you're not allowed in.
Maybe I've been shooting from a different base.....
Another lesson learned fro MENNOTES!
'gail f
|
413.40 | | TRNSAM::HOLT | Robert Holt, ISV Atelier West | Mon Mar 05 1990 23:16 | 7 |
|
Re UK places with a dress code
Thats not the half of it... they also have trained French attack
maitre-ds with finely tuned scowls of dissaproval for withering
uppity colonials...
|
413.41 | | AITG::DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, nice person | Mon Mar 05 1990 23:51 | 2 |
| It would be nice if someone posted how to tie the
things! :-)
|
413.42 | The bitter voice of experience | STAR::RDAVIS | Dangle with the angels | Tue Mar 06 1990 01:16 | 1 |
| Borrow a Boy Scout manual.
|
413.43 | BOW OR STRAIGHT? | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Grail seeker | Tue Mar 06 1990 09:31 | 17 |
|
Re : .41
Do you mean bow ties or "normal" ties?
On "normal", the "Colour for Men" book illustrates more weird and
wonderful knots than I've ever come across in daily use.....(apart
from sorting out the rest of your wardrobe!).
On bow ties - get a woman to tie it for you ;-)
Seriously - I instructed my whole (male) Sales Unit before a formal
dinner on one occasion. Clip-fastening bow ties look naff with
wing-collared shirts IMO (and theirs)....
'gail
|
413.44 | | XLIB::HOLT | Robert Holt ISV Atelier West | Tue Mar 13 1990 18:29 | 9 |
|
Bow ties are not what men who wish to portray integrity wear.
They are for the likes of CBS commentators, movie reviewers,
or boxing referees...
However, Irving R. Levine looks and sounds trustworthy in one..
why I haven't a clue.
|
413.46 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | we'll open the door, do anything we decide to | Tue Mar 13 1990 22:15 | 10 |
| Holt> Bow ties are not what men who wish to portray integrity wear.
Bow ties are personal expression. Nothing more, nothing
less.
kath
|
413.47 | Would you buy a used car from a man wearing a bow tie? | CLYPPR::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Wed Mar 14 1990 05:46 | 6 |
| Yes, bow ties are symbols of personal expression. However,
"a recent poll" concluded that the perception of people who
where bow ties is that they are not to be trusted. Thus, perhaps,
the statement in .44.
ed
|
413.48 | who sez? | LEAF::G_KNIGHTING | Thinkingspeakingthinkingspeaking. | Wed Mar 14 1990 10:04 | 11 |
|
> Yes, bow ties are symbols of personal expression. However,
> "a recent poll" concluded that the perception of people who
> where bow ties is that they are not to be trusted.
Were the people who responded to this "recent poll" perchance
wearing four-in-hands? And would they be more likely to trust,
say, Richard Nixon or Jim Wright than, say, Archibald Cox?
a proud (but apparently untrustworthy) wearer of bow ties
|
413.49 | too many "polls" | BANZAI::FISHER | Dictionary is not. | Thu Mar 15 1990 06:59 | 10 |
| You never know where these "polls" come from unless you read the
journals and even then statisticians are to be suspected (perhaps they
wear bow ties? :-) :-) ) I think this one was one of those USA Today
factoids.
Personnally, I don't trust anyone in a tie, of any sort, but I do
realize that custom dictates certain modes of dress for certain types
of business.
ed
|
413.50 | Have fun with dumb rules | IAMOK::BANCROFT | | Fri Mar 23 1990 12:21 | 10 |
| Aw, heck. Personally I LOVE stupid rules.
My tendency would be to ask if the dress code applied to just
coats and ties, and when assured that it did, remove my shirt
and t shirt and put on the tie.
An alternative would be to remove the pants, but I catch cold
easily.
Seriously, though, my full formal Scots Regalia has no tie, it has
the kilt, a green velvet jacket, and lace cuffs and a lace "Jabot"
(kinda like a short bib of white lace). It is the full equivalent
of a Tuxedo for evening wear. Would that be accepted? Phil
|
413.51 | | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Grail seeker | Mon Mar 26 1990 08:31 | 8 |
|
Sounds totally acceptable for any occasion to me Phil.....
Kilts.
(Pant. Whimper.)
'gail
|
413.52 | Society Notes | STAR::RDAVIS | The Man Without Quantities | Mon Mar 26 1990 10:19 | 21 |
| � Kilts.
� (Pant. Whimper.)
Not to mention...
Pants.
(Kilt. Whimper.)
And the ever-popular:
Wimps.
(Pant. Kilter.)
(To actually tie this reply into the topic, I was at a performance
piece last Thursday in which the lead actor needed help with his bow
tie. Not one person in the audience knew how to do it - all the men,
including your correspondent, had always had some woman do it for them
and all the women - well, they must've been different women. The poor
dude had to leave it dangling for the rest of the night.)
Ray
|
413.53 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | Too late for the toolbox | Mon Mar 26 1990 10:48 | 9 |
| > dude had to leave it dangling for the rest of the night.)
someone should have volunteered to help him.
|
413.54 | Gentlemen jackets...Ladies whatever! | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | Call 1-800-AVON, Medusa! | Thu Oct 18 1990 10:11 | 35 |
| I wanted to open a discussion on this subject and found out that it
already existed.... Anyway, here's my reply...
*******************************************************************
Just one question: does it never upset you that in high category
restaurants it's only men who are supposed to be "smartly" dressed,
smartly meaning wearing ANY jacket and ANY tie you can get hold of?
It's just so ridiculous when you see the sign:
"Gentlemen - jacket, please"
"Gentlemen - jacket and tie, please"
"No jeans"
etc etc
It make me nervous because one can be very smartly dressed WITHOUT
wearing the grey/blue suit uniform of the average white collar
worker...and wearing a silk designer tie and a $250 tank top doesn't
convince the waiter at all, let me tell you, and it's downright
ridiculous and liable to spoil your evening if you just happen to try
to get into such a place in the flow of the evening...
And....why only the MEN? Why can women always get in everywhere no
matter what they wear?? More precisely: Why wasn't I allowed in
yesterday when the total cost of what I was wearing surely amounted to
a one week vacation in Greece, and a friend of mine who was wearing the
most pitiful worn out, ill fitting, outfashioned grey suit wouldn't
have had any problem to get into that damn-rotten piano bar? And one of
the women friends that went with us was wearing jeans, and the waiter
said it was ok, at which I nearly got apoplectic... And while we were
discussing with the waiter what a backward imbecile he was, a guy was
left in wearing something that once probably resembled John Travolta's
suit in "Saturday Night Fever", but had seen more washing than the
dollars of the Coca-Mafia since then...
We went to another place which proved to be a lot more enjoyable, but I
didn't stop talking about arming ourselves with Molotov-cocktails and
baseball bats and obliging that piano bar with another visit for a
couple of hours...
...Paul
|
413.55 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 18 1990 10:26 | 3 |
| See my .3.
Steve
|
413.56 | Enough Rope to Hang 'em | SALEM::KUPTON | The Sox Let Me Down | Fri Oct 19 1990 08:47 | 19 |
| Remember.....These places will let a woman in wearing anything or
almost nothing to attract men. They then place restrictions on the men
to make them "dress" because it attracts more women seeking males who
"appear" successful. This gives the establishment an 'aura' of being a
high class or upper level meeting place. This causes a spiral of
competitiveness upwardly and often times makes the club ""THE"" place
to be seen, heard, smelled..........
I went to a place like this with my wife. They refused to allow me
to enter. I went to the car, got a piece of rope and whipped it into a
windsor, picked up spring jacket, turned in the collar and dared the
rectum at the door to refuse me again. I was so loud and obnoxious that
people were beginning to walk out. After they seated me, I took off the
rope, put it in the water glass, took my wife's hand and walked out.
Not exactly a mature thing to do, but I had lost my appetite
anyway.
Ken
|
413.57 | Don't buy Ken a tie for Father's Day | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Fri Oct 19 1990 13:24 | 9 |
| Wow! Ballsy move, Ken. I think about retaliatory actions like that
often, but only after I'm back in the car, cursing myself for not
doing/saying what I reeealy think. Remind me never to piss you off.
(smiley face and whatnot ...)
Larry
|
413.58 | | SX4GTO::HOLT | | Fri Oct 19 1990 16:00 | 2 |
|
rope ties are pretty common in cowboy bars, rodeos, and CW concerts..
|
413.59 | | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Fri Oct 19 1990 16:20 | 3 |
| ... and lynchings.
Larry
|
413.60 | Referring to rope around neck tactic. | DOOLIN::HNELSON | Evolution in action | Fri Oct 19 1990 17:06 | 5 |
| My wife's embarrassment meter would have blown a fuse, and she'd have
filed the next day. I won't even tell her that story, lest she take
preemptive action.
- Hoyt
|