T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
292.1 | | COMET::BERRY | Howie Mandel in a previous life. | Fri Oct 14 1988 12:05 | 6 |
|
Just trying to buy a decent car seems impossible, never mind
a house.
Good luck though,
Dwight
|
292.2 | Good Luck | IMBACQ::MOREAU | hope I'm sleepin at nuclear time | Fri Oct 14 1988 13:06 | 9 |
| RE .1 TRUE
RE .0 Good luck
Getting a mortgage when paying child support according to guidelines?
Ha ha,:^) if anyone can figure out a way, hope you share it.
Dennis_who_pays_high_support
P.S. If I sound bitter, it's probably because I am.
|
292.3 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Fri Oct 14 1988 14:15 | 17 |
| RE: .0
Do you live in New England, by any chance?
The cost of homes is so high there, I can't imagine how ANYONE
affords a mortgage.
Does anyone know what the average monthly payment is for a house
back there? It must be astronomical.
Out here, most people that I know pay around $800 (but I do
know some who pay as high as $1000 or more for a nicer house.)
(Sorry for the tangent. Just curious after watching "This Old
House" on PBS last night and seeing what people pay for new
and remodeled houses in Lexington, Massachusetts. I thought
they had to be kidding!)
|
292.4 | Lexington is expensive to breath in... | SALEM::AMARTIN | WE like da cars, Da cars dat go BOOM! | Fri Oct 14 1988 15:14 | 10 |
| on TOH EVERYTHINGS expensive, Sue. Houses around here are indeed
expensive but it can be done...
Now, as for the gent getting "reamed" if oyu live in NE forget
it. An average home IE: 2br, 1 bath etc goes for about, say 130k?
You can do a YUK cond for about 90k or so... but who wants to live
in an over glorified apartment? Not I.
Our hous is 125 (+-) years old and went for 109... figure it out...
By the time we are done "this ol housing it" the damn thing will
be worth about 200 (i Hope)...
|
292.5 | Be serious.... | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Fri Oct 14 1988 15:22 | 19 |
| Things aren't as bad in "New England" as some say, and how anyone
could believe that the six-state area has uniform attributes
is a mystery to me.
If you don't insist on living in the glitziest parts of a city
or a posh town, you can buy very nice houses for reasonable
prices (under $100K). Even in Nashua, I found a large 3BR, 2 bath
house for under $125K a year ago. (And my next-door neighbor's
house is for sale at a similar price...)
But, to the original subject...
Having half your pay disappear is bound to put a severe cramp on
your ability to get financing. And that's understandable, considering
you have to pay your mortgage somehow. The only solutions I see
are to make more money or to get the level of support payments
reduced. I wish you luck...
Steve
|
292.6 | I won't use that term again... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Fri Oct 14 1988 15:28 | 8 |
| RE: .5
Sorry, Steve, I forgot how touchy some folks are when an outsider
refers to their state (and nearby states) as "New England."...:-)
I was just curious. If things are not as expensive where you
are as I've heard, then I'm glad.
|
292.8 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | got to crack this ice and fly... | Fri Oct 14 1988 15:30 | 11 |
| Latest sadistic statistic I heard:
A house in Massachusetts costs an average of $140K.
A house within the rte 128 belt costs an average of $240K.
(of course the cost of the second contributes to the cost of the
first, but it's still pretty disheartening.)
-Jody
|
292.12 | ex | HOTJOB::GROUNDS | CAUTION: Yuppies in road | Fri Oct 14 1988 20:00 | 6 |
| RE: .10
Who can we blame for the price of anything... ourselves. When the
demand goes up, so too, does the price. I recall that when the
interest rates started to come back down in the early '80s, the
pent up demand for housing drove the prices up radically. It was
really a sellers market.
|
292.13 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt, UltrixAppsGp@UCO | Sun Oct 16 1988 22:50 | 16 |
|
I realize this is a tangent, but as a visitor to Colorado
I am amazed at the value one can get for the real estate dollar
here.
40 acres, a barn, and a cabin for 110k... within 40 miles of
Colorado Springs. New, decent tract homes near town start around
75k...
110k in the Bay (SF Bay) Area will get a condo (1BR 1Ba) under
the Moffet Field flight pattern.
It will buy a 3BR 2Ba house in Los Banos, Modesto, or Patterson
though. I thought for about a minute before deciding that a 100+
mile one way commute is inoperative, so I will continue to rent
and live near Los Altos.
|
292.14 | | COMET::BRUNO | BRUNO::COMET | Mon Oct 17 1988 00:15 | 12 |
| Re: .13
Well, try this one for a heart-breaker. I have a 7-minute
commute (when the traffic is bad), and a rent bill that is lower
than an economy car payment. We have a ski area in town, and
outrageous hiking mere minutes away from DEC. Are you sure you
don't want to move to Colorado Springs?
As for how I would handle it with a child-support bill to take
care of, well, I'll let ya know in a few years.
Greg
|
292.15 | How Do You Survive ? | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Mon Oct 17 1988 09:19 | 13 |
| I don't kbow how any of you guys that have child support payments
rent never mind buy. I can't believe the courts award such high
child support when anybody knows that if the guy had the child living
with him it wouldn't cost half as much. a guy I know was paying $75.00
per week for each child total $225.00 total, that was 8 yrs ago.
He also had to pay for the ex'es car payment. He ended up living
in low income studio apartments while the wife kept the house of
4 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, and a swimming pool. I have 2 children, and
I don't believe that it cost me $75.00 for the both of them. I just
don't understand the high payments for child support that the courts
are awarding.
Jim
|
292.16 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Mon Oct 17 1988 09:46 | 17 |
| I have an uncle that is an airline pilot making very good income.
In his divorce 9 years ago his wife was awarded the house 4800sqft,
5 bedroom,pool and 800/mo child support per child(1boy,1girl) the
kids go to a private school and take 30 day vacations to europe,
orient,ect. He lives in 3 room cabin living/bedroom,bath,kitchen
that is barely big enough to turn around in, drives(not by choice)
a 18 year old car and visits my family for vacation(free lodging).
To add insult to injury a few years ago there was a layoff that
caused him to be out of work for 4 months his wife had him thrown
in jail within 48 hours of the time she found out he wouldent be
able to make the support payments on time.
Talk about paying for a mistake!
-j
|
292.17 | There is a way.... | USMRW2::LCORNELL | | Mon Oct 17 1988 12:04 | 13 |
| To get back to your original the only suggestion I have is I suggest
you look at Muti-family homes. Look in areas where you can buy at
least a 3-family and live in one apt. When you go for a Mortgage
you are allowed to claim most of the rents as income toward the
mortgage. Once you get approved and build up some equity you can
begin to trade up from there. A 4-family would be better qualification
wise, etc.....but look at the long run rather than a single now.
Also you will be able to increase your net pay with deductions on
the house from the I.R.S. It can be done.........
Good Luck,
LEC
|
292.18 | A possible hitch | MAGGOT::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Mon Oct 17 1988 13:22 | 9 |
| re: .17
Aren't child support payments determined as a percentage of total
income, which in the situation you propose would include the rental
income? Can one reasonably expect the rental income from such a
property to be sufficient to cover the mortgage, maintenance expenses,
and the additional child support?
- Jerry
|
292.19 | This is the LAW | VINO::KSTEVENS | Everyone is lonesome for someone else | Mon Oct 17 1988 15:02 | 7 |
| re: 18
Jerry,
Expenses and other bills ARE NOT taken into account when child support
is determined. It's a strict percentage of one's GROSS income regardless of
other expenses.
Ken
|
292.20 | It Stinks | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Mon Oct 17 1988 15:05 | 5 |
| re:17 & .18
Yeah, the guy I knew of, every time his ex thought his income increased
she haul him back into court for more. One time DEC had to send
a lawyer to prove that he didn't turn down a promotion to avoid
paying more child support.
|
292.21 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt, UltrixAppsGp@UCO | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:25 | 6 |
|
Yeah, its real tough. Gotta try not to make enemies and
to not burn bridges. You pay for the privelege of hating
your ex. Be diplomatic and try to work it out of court.
It stinks, but what can you do? It's cheaper to keep her.
|
292.22 | | COMET::BRUNO | BRUNO::COMET | Mon Oct 17 1988 21:05 | 4 |
| Thet feller from "Married with Children" said it's cheaper
to waste her.
Greg
|
292.23 | | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Mon Oct 17 1988 22:07 | 9 |
| re: .19
Ken,
The point I was trying to make is that the rental income will be
included in the gross income used to compute the support payment.
Or is this not correct?
- Jerry
|
292.25 | Sorry for the mis-interpretation | YQUEM::KSTEVENS | Everyone is lonesome for someone else | Tue Oct 18 1988 11:13 | 8 |
| re:.23
Jerry,
Sorry, I missed your point.... Yes, that is the case.... Any other
income will be used to compute the percentage of child support... I
misunderstood your first statement. Sorry
|
292.26 | Support Guidlines | BOSHOG::STRIFE | but for.....i wouldn't be me. | Sun Oct 23 1988 21:03 | 65 |
| About 12 mos. ago "child Support Guidelines" were put into effect
in Mass. Most states should have some guidelines since the feds
are requriing it for federal aid. Anyway, the guidelines are
"supposed"to put some equity into the amount of support awarded.
The aprties can agree to amounts other than those dictated by the
guidelinee, but in my experience, the judge will want an explanation
of why. The guidelines apply where combined gross income of both
parties does not exceed $100K and where the income of the noncustodial
parent does not exceed $75K. The way the basic guidlines work is this:
Gorss Weekly Income (non-custodial parent) 1 child 2 3
$0 - $200 Discretion of Court not <$50/mo
$201 -$500 25% 28% 31%
(+2%) (+2%) (+2%)
Age Differential
AGE OF OLDEST CHILD
0-6 Basic Order Applies
7-12 Basic Order + 10% of
Basic Order
13-18 Basic Order + 15% of
Basic Order
The Basic Order is figured by taking the Noncustodial parent's
gross income (less any prior support obligations) and mulitplying
it by the % shown above.
The Basic Order is adjusted for the ages of the children. (Adjusted
Basic ORder.)
This figure is then adjusted by the Custodial Parent's Income. To
do this the Court figures as follows. The Custodial Parent is allowed
$15K 'free income' (no adjustment to the support). They
are also allowed to deduct the annual cost of day care from the
their gross income. (Custodial Parent's Adjusted Gross Income =
Gross Income less $15k, less day care.)
The two incomes (noncustodial gross and custodial adjsuted gross)
are then added together. The custodial gross income is divided
by the noncustodial gross income to come up with a %. That % is
mulitplied times the Adjusted Basic Order to come up with the
support amount.
Although expenses and otehr financial obligations are not included
in the support guidelines, each party must complete a Financial
Statement which includes these. Many Courts now have a person
who sits down with parties and mediates support disputes before
they go into the courtroom. At that time the financial obligations
of the party may, and often do, effect the final amount of the
support.
Child Support is not meant to be punative. It is meant to ensure
that children are adequately taken care of when parent's divorce.
That doesn't mean that it isn't used in a vindictive manner. These
guidlines should help to cut down on tht abuse.
A word of advice. Spend the time, money and energy getting a fair
order up front. Generally changing an existing order requires a
finding of a "material change of circumstance" which can be a tough
thing to show.
|
292.27 | self employed??? | SALEM::MELANSON | nut at work | Mon Oct 24 1988 13:06 | 6 |
|
Just a technical question - how do the guide lines apply to
a self employed parent? This way wages may be manipulated to
show high or low as he or she wishes.
Jim
|
292.28 | | BOSHOG::STRIFE | but for.....i wouldn't be me. | Mon Oct 24 1988 17:02 | 8 |
| re: .27
Good question. Haven't run into that in my practice but I believe
that I would supoena tax records for the last 3-5 years, bank account
records and possibly (if they exist) the other party's business
records. From there you should be able to get some picture of what
the party's average income is. It probably isn't going to be real
accurate but should let you get to a starting point.
|
292.29 | One is to laugh at such folly.... | CASV01::SALOIS | Fatal Attraction is holding me fast | Mon Oct 31 1988 13:38 | 18 |
|
.0
"Any suggestions on how a divorced father can get a mortgage?"
Sure, win Megabucks!
Want to know what's worse than trying to get a mortgage?
Paying a 600% (yes, that's right.... six hundred percent) increase
in your cost of living.
I owned a home in RI with a mortgage of $132 mo.
Now, I pay rent in excess of $800 mo.
If you ever figure out a way, please let me know.
---- Still paying the freight -----
|
292.30 | agree first and do-it-yourself! | BLITZN::LITASI | Time and Tide | Sun Nov 06 1988 21:55 | 24 |
|
Just so you know that not ALL women are out to get their
ex-husbands...
Friday at 3:50pm my divorce was pronounced final by the
judge (Douglas County, Colorado)! The judge asked both
of us if we realized that we were waiving the right to
maintenance (also known as alimony). We said "yes".
Then he asked if we were prepared to share in all the
decisions concerning our daughter (ie. joint custody).
We said "yes". Then he asked about living arrangements
for our daughter. We said we were alternating weeks
of physical custody, and would split expenses like food,
clothing, tuition, etc 50/50, therefore no need to
exchange money via "child support"... He was somewhat
surprised, but agreed to it...with the stipulation that
if circumstances change, so could the arrangements.
So...no alimony, no child support, splitting sale of house
50/50... meanwhile, though until the house sells, I get to
pay the mortgage of $1200/mo... at least I get to live in it!
sherry
|
292.31 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Sun Nov 06 1988 22:07 | 8 |
| Re: .30
Congratulations, Sherry. Your agreement is almost identical to
the one for my divorce. It is important to realize that this
sort of thing only works when the two parties aren't angry at each
other and have similar income and resources.
Steve
|
292.32 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Sun Nov 06 1988 23:59 | 31 |
|
Actually, Steve, it's possible to have an agreeable arrangement
even when there is anger and a substancial difference in indivi-
dual income.
My husband and I agreed that he would pay a substancial amount
in child support, in order for our son to continue his lifestyle.
The referee (in the state of Colorado) tried to persuade my husband
that he was paying too much. It concerns me that the state will
not allow consenting adults to make a responsible decision.
We also agreed to 50/50 custody. However, I pay all child care
costs, and related expenses including clothing, etc.
It should be noted that there was considerable anger between us.
However, it stayed exactly there-between us. either one of us
used money or our child as a tool to 'punish' the other.
Finally, as my income as increased and my situation has become more
stable, I have asked my husband several times to decrease the amount
of support that he pays. He has declined, therefore, I am putting
the amount I would have deducted in a savings account in my son's
name.
I don't think we are out of the ordinary individuals-just two
responsible adults willing to act in a reasonable manner. I don't
understand why this type of situation is not more commmon.
Deb
|
292.33 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Mon Nov 07 1988 10:58 | 9 |
| Cheers to you and your ex, Deb. However, my remark in .31 was directed
at the "equal split" arrangement that Sherry described, with no
child support or "maintenance".
Perhaps instead of saying "no anger" I should have said that it works
when the parents put their child's well-being ahead of any differences
they may have.
Steve
|
292.34 | Mortgages can be found | BANZAI::FISHER | Pat Pending | Mon Dec 18 1989 07:56 | 20 |
| The inquiry of the base note was "How do you qualify for a mortgage
when you have support payments?" Well, I did it. Yes it's a 95K
townhouse condo but I am a home owner again. The biggest question
is whether or not you can swing the payments including the downpayment.
Then you find a mortgage broker, he will charge another point and your
interest rate will be higher. My rate was only about 1/4 higher and
the mortgage is with Citicorp (heh, almost the same as my charge card).
What you will have to do is document a bunch of things, like all your
payments are made, etc. One of my hassles was that I still had my name
on a couple of other mortgages and another car payment. I also had
to do a few things with my other debt load.
A broker may also have access to money from private citizens who are
willing to take a chance.
I am sure that if you add together all of the "stress factors"
(finalizing a divorce, adding to debt load, ...) I am a prime candidate
for something bad; it's a good thing I didn't get a raise this year !�
ed
|
292.35 | reply - .26 | GIAMEM::HOVEY | | Thu Jan 11 1990 08:39 | 6 |
|
If the non-custodial parent makes 40k and the custodial makes
30k along with the fact that there's 2 teenage kids involved that
are 13 and 17 years old what is a fair estimate of what the
non-custodial parent might be required to pay based on the guidelines
?
|
292.36 | In NH | NOVA::FISHER | Pat Pending | Fri Jan 12 1990 07:15 | 8 |
| It varies by state. In NH -- according to the opinions I have been
provided -- it's 33% x (net of 40k after taxes). I.e., the 30k is
irrelevant and immaterial for support but if it didn't exist would
be cause for alimony. The 33% could be higher if you don't maintain
medical insurance.
ed
|