T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
262.1 | Where have I seen this before? | MPGS::BOYAN | | Tue Aug 09 1988 10:14 | 21 |
|
There is little if anything he can do. As a recent veteran of a
bitter divorce ( on her part only ) I know that the courts ( Worcester
Probate, Mass. ) will give little credance to the ex-husband in this
matter. But in regard to the ex-wife the inverse is true. The court
is virtually biased in total favor of the Custodial Mother.
My advice for him is to avoid getting into an arguemenative
situation with her even if it means temporarialy curtailing his
visitation until the final settelment of the divorce. When he does
go he should bring along one or two friends as witnesses. Do not go
into the home. Above all keep smiling and make no reply what-so-ever
to the agression. Do not put the children in the middle of it nor
speak any ill-will of the mother to, or, in front of them.
Tell him not to worry that the children will be alienated from him.
Just be the best father he can be under these limitations and
conditions. Only the marriage is lost and not the children. Focus
on them and life after the divorce. Later in life they will come to
know the truth. So will others. As Shakespear said: "Murder will
out."
|
262.2 | this is not a divorce situation | BPOV06::MACKINNON | | Tue Aug 09 1988 10:21 | 8 |
|
This is not a divorce situation. They never married so there
is no divorce decree. They are trying to settle on an agreement
with the courts over custody and visitation rights. It would
seem that she is trying to get back at her for not marrying her.
But regardless, I want her to stop abusing him and was wondering
if there is any legal manner which can be used to do this.
|
262.3 | Been There | MPGS::BOYAN | | Tue Aug 09 1988 12:28 | 17 |
|
Glad it is not a divorce. But then again the court must first be
satisfied that it is his child and that he will pay support under the
mandated Child Support Guidelines. If he has approached the Probate
in good will and offers support, then in the eyes of the court her
present actions (agressive and violent behavior) will be of little
matter to them. The court considers the child above all in these
matters.
To stop her actions he must obtain a Restraining Order against
her. Consult the Court Clerk, a lawyer (BOO, HISS) or the local
police on how to obtain one. Again, he must have the patience and
demeanor of a saint to succeed. Make sure there are witnesses, if
possible.
Good Luck to him, he'll need it.
|
262.4 | More of the same | MPGS::BOYAN | | Tue Aug 09 1988 12:36 | 9 |
|
Sorry about the cold water, but she will get custody, and he will
pay support. At least his efforts will result in joint cusody - he
will become a weekend father (every other weekend). All this agressive
contention will not get her any more than that or him any less.
A Restraining Order will stop the violence. Or at least reduce it
greatly. Tell him not to delay getting one.
|
262.5 | Say cheese | GRANMA::MWANNEMACHER | | Tue Aug 09 1988 13:49 | 5 |
| HAVE witnesses and get photographs of the cuts. (It helps if you
get them before he gets a chance to clean them up.) Having the
court see what was done is a hell of alot better then a description.
Mike
|
262.6 | Love Is Not Possesive | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Tue Aug 09 1988 14:11 | 9 |
|
If he loves the child, he will do what is best for her. I don't
know the entire situation, but love sometimes means having to let
go. The mother no doubt will receive custody. If the child will
only suffer emotional damage by him pursuing a custody battle,
then he should let go.
Jim
|
262.7 | This is a criminal matter | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Heisenburg might have been here | Tue Aug 09 1988 15:17 | 6 |
| Wait a minute. If he can document what happened - witnesses and/or
photographs of the damage and/or medical testimony, he should be
able to pursue this through the criminal courts. Last I knew, assault
and battery were illegal.
Elizabeth
|
262.8 | no one was there | BPOV06::MACKINNON | | Tue Aug 09 1988 15:21 | 8 |
|
As far as him suing for assault and battery it is just
his word against hers. No one was there except the child
who was in her mothers other arm while she was swinging
at him. But I don't think she can be counted because she
is only 2. This time she didn't cut him up so he didn't have
to go to the hospital. I guess she is wising up to the system
and understands how to manipulate it.
|
262.9 | | RATTLE::MONAHAN | | Tue Aug 09 1988 15:37 | 5 |
| Sounds, to me, like this is a *very* sick lady who desperately needs
some help.
I sure hope she doesn't abuse the child now or in the future......
|
262.10 | One Tough Lady | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Tue Aug 09 1988 15:55 | 4 |
| Sounds like a strong lady, to be able to beat up a man while holding
the child in her arms. I'm sure she has a side to her story.
Jim
|
262.11 | VIOLLA! The advocate has arrisen.... | SALEM::AMARTIN | My AHDEDAHZZ REmix, by uLtRaVeRsE | Wed Aug 10 1988 02:36 | 2 |
| I was wondering how long it would be before someone would say something
like that.....
|
262.12 | her side of the story | BPOV04::MACKINNON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 08:32 | 33 |
|
re. 10
Here is her side of the story on that night. She was 1.5 hours
late picking up her child from his scheduled visitation time.
The time was 11:30 at night and she never even called to say
she would be late. They were sharing an apartment, but she moved
out on him a month earlier with no notice. She wanted to pick up
a few things which still remained in the apartment. But it was
11:30 at night and the kid was sleeping. Also under the temp.
agreement the courts gave them, she was supposed to tell her
lawyer when she wanted to finish getting her stuff and then
her lawyer would talk to his lawyer and they would make arrangements
for him to be out of the apartment while she gathered her things.
So he told her that she could not get her stuff because her lawyer
insisted he not be in the house while she was there. So HE was
adhering to the court stipulated agreement which he is supposed
to follow strictly or he could lose what little custody he has now.
She then got upset because he was following the rules and she picked
up her kid and started swinging.
This isn't the first time she has done this. In fact she quite
often would come after him with the child in her arms. Now personally
I feel that if you have to beat on someone DON'T involve the child.
This kid flips out everytime this happens. I have been there on
a few occasions to witness this woman's actions. I have seen her
pick up her child and go after him. Now if she were mad at him
and wanted to go after him then why does she need the child to help
her???
She is subjecting her child to this violence and it it wrong!!
|
262.13 | Bad For The Child | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Wed Aug 10 1988 09:34 | 10 |
| re:12
I don't doubt your story. The only thing I was questioning is
that you mention that she beat him up while holding the child
in her arms. Most people would have a hard time beating someone
while holding a bag of groceries, never mind a child. It would
seem to me, that he could defened himself and not cause harm to her or
the child. In all the situation sounds bad. I hope the child can
get through it, without becomming bitter against the world.
Jim
|
262.14 | I'm not surprized | MPGS::BOYAN | | Wed Aug 10 1988 10:00 | 9 |
|
Re: 12
I believe you. My Ex did much the same thing with the children
present in order to create the maximum effect of emotional storm.
And always these outbursts were created when I strictly adhered
to the Temporary Order causing her to fly off the handle, to put
it mildly. It stopped with the injunction of a Mutual Restraining
Order and me having to bring witnesses along during my visitation.
|
262.15 | You are not in his shoes | BPOV04::MACKINNON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 10:04 | 32 |
|
re. 13
Ok the problem you seem to be having is with my choice of the
phrase 'beat up'. She was punching him and kicking him.
He did not do anything but raise his arms to block her punches.
This woman has nasty nails and lets face it most woman will use
these weapons and scratch untill they draw blood. So obviously
the term beat up is different with men fighting and woman fighting.
Regardless, this woman insists on picking up her kid ( who is two)
and starts hacking away.
As far as defending himself , due to the situation the only thing
he could do was retreat. Because if the courts found out that he
hit her (even if it was self defense) they would consider him an
abuser. However, since most judges think the same way that you
appear to that a woman could never beat up a man or start a fight
that it must have been started by the man and the woman was just
defending herself. This is bullshit. Have you ever seen two woman
go after each other? Believe me it is not a pretty sight and YES
some woman are capable of really doing damage to a man.
However since most men are bigger and stronger and also have been
taught to fight, the majority of people believe that women in
general can not 'beat up a man'. Well if you were trying to gain\
some custody with your child and that childs mother started to hit
you, I think you too would retreat and not hit back because you
too know that she has the system on her side. If her really wanted
to all he has to do it hit her once and that would be the end.
He would probably satisfy is male ego , but he would have just kissed
his daughter goodbye. What would you do??
|
262.16 | Sounds Ugly | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Wed Aug 10 1988 10:54 | 6 |
| Re:15
Got your point.
What would I do ? I really do not know.
Jim
|
262.17 | Please... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 14:10 | 18 |
| RE: .15
> let's face it most women will use these weapons and scratch
> until they draw blood...
When you generalize about women in this way, you are ALSO
talking about yourself, you know. Do *you* use your nails
to draw blood when you are angry? No? Neither do I.
Neither do most women (just as most men do *NOT* beat up women
when they are angry, even though they come equipped with weapons
that would easily do worse damage than nails when used with
any sort of force at all.)
This woman is an individual, and is responsible (as an individu-
al) for her own actions. If her actions are the result of
being a woman, then your friend would have to be pretty crazy
to trust you any more than he trusts her. See what I mean?
|
262.18 | yes i would | BPOV04::MACKINNON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 14:22 | 12 |
|
re. 17
Ok I see what you are saying. But I have never seen a woman NOT
use her nails if she were in a physical confrontation. For some
of us that is one way we were taught to defend ourselves. I myself
could never use my nails because I have a nasty habit which prevents
them from getting to any substantial length. But if given the
opurtunity to use them yes I would. Mind you I am only 5'1" so
If I were to punch someone I would usually be hitting below the
belt due to my size. If I were defending myself I would use any
method I could.
|
262.19 | To hell with this double-standard! | TSECAD::HEALY | Perpetuating life makes no sense. | Wed Aug 10 1988 15:13 | 8 |
|
She assaulted him. She should be prosecuted and convicted and
sent to prison, just like a man would be!
|
262.20 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 20:33 | 17 |
| RE: .18
Well, I don't know where you live (or hang out) but I've *never*
seen a woman use nails as a primary offensive or defensive
weapon, so I seriously dispute your claim to the use of the
phrase "most women" when it comes to tendencies to use nails
(or even tendencies to become violent.)
As a point of fact, nails make a very ineffective weapon in
most cases because of the fact that they break so easily.
One would probably have more luck trying to stab someone with
a newspaper.
Please don't generalize about "most women" based on the levels
to which *some* women might sink in 'worst case' scenerios.
Women are not all alike.
|
262.21 | Men are not always sent to jail either... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Wed Aug 10 1988 20:38 | 19 |
| RE: .19
> She assaulted him. She should be prosecuted and convicted
> and sent to prison, just like a man would be!
Right. Tell that to my ex-husband's second wife who had him
arrested at least 5 times for assault (and she had *witnesses*
and pictures of the severe facial and bodily injuries she
sustained from him.) He never spent more than a single night
in jail for any of it.
Tell it to the family of the two children I know who were
sexually assaulted by a white heterosexual male co-worker of
their father's. The man pleaded guilty to felony child assault
and spent 45 days of a 90-day sentence in the county facility.
At the sentencing hearing of the child molester, I saw a young
woman get sentenced to two years in the state prison for *trying*
to pass two bad checks worth less than $200.
|
262.22 | Care to look? | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Heisenburg might have been here | Wed Aug 10 1988 23:05 | 11 |
| Re .20 (Women using nails)
My own mother has attacked me with her nails several times. I've still
got a couple of scars none of which is less than 6 years old, when I
learned to remove myself from her presence when she was angry at me.
Care to come over and look?
And most women I know will use whatever is available to them in
a fight - fingernails included.
Elizabeth
|
262.23 | | SALEM::AMARTIN | My AHDEDAHZZ REmix, by uLtRaVeRsE | Wed Aug 10 1988 23:55 | 19 |
| Sue, What Gives????
OK, so she Generalized, SORRY! That is NOT the ISSUE HERE!
On the subject....
Jes a thought.... Maybe she holds the child knowing that he would
NEVER strike her while she held him/her???
I admire this gent for keeping such a cool head during such an ordeal.
It must be hell on the child to witness this.... I wonder what
happens to the child when noone is around???? If she can be so
vicious toward him, whats to say that she is or is NOT like that toward
the child?
This is just A THOUGHT, I am NOT making assumtions here, jes wondering
out loud...
|
262.24 | no one knows | BPOV06::MACKINNON | | Thu Aug 11 1988 09:30 | 15 |
|
re.23
That is the scarey thing. I have not had the oppurtunity to see
her without him being there. So I really do not know what she
would do or even if she does do anything. However, since she
moved out we have been noticing quite a few cuts and bruises.\
Now she is only two and quite rambuncious so this could be due
to that. BUT she never had as many as she does now while they
were living in the same apartment. It is one thing to beat on him,
but she knowingly subjects her child to this violence. One would
question whether she actually does anything to the child while noone
else is around to witness it. Personally, it is my opinion that
her including her child in the fights is a form of child abuse.
|
262.25 | | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | The Colonel | Thu Aug 11 1988 13:26 | 9 |
|
.20 �One would probably have more luck trying to stab someone with a
�newspaper.
Whilst I take your point about the usefullness of fingernails as
weapons, it is quite possible to kill somebody with a tightly
rolled newspaper, using yawara style attacks.
/. Ian .\
|
262.26 | HOLD IT! | VLNVAX::RWHEELER | Laughing with the sinners | Thu Aug 11 1988 15:35 | 18 |
| >>> -< no one knows >-
>>> re.23
>>> her without him being there. So I really do not know what she
>>> would do or even if she does do anything. However, since she
>>> moved out we have been noticing quite a few cuts and bruises.\
>>> Now she is only two and quite rambuncious so this could be due
>>> to that. BUT she never had as many as she does now while they
>>> were living in the same apartment. It is one thing to beat on him,
now wait a minute!! My son is almost two, and he has
alot more cuts and bruises in the last few months also..
They are just beginning to run/get into everything/climb/etc...
I'm not going to say any more, or I'll definatly lose my cool.
/Robin
|
262.27 | | GENRAL::DANIEL | Still crazy after all these fears | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:18 | 14 |
| re; .23
> Jes a thought.... Maybe she holds the child knowing that he would
> NEVER strike her while she held him/her???
My first thought, exactly.
When I think about the implications of the child witnessing this, I get dizzy.
The story of the child molester that got a slap on the wrists while a
check-bouncer got the full whip-on-the-back treatment...geez, is that a
statement of where our values are?
Screwed up, it is, that a woman, a PERSON, as manipulative as this violent Mama
seems to be, gets first dibs on screwing a kid's perspective...
|
262.28 | | GENRAL::DANIEL | Still crazy after all these fears | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:22 | 13 |
| re; .26, Robin
> now wait a minute!! My son is almost two, and he has
> alot more cuts and bruises in the last few months also..
> They are just beginning to run/get into everything/climb/etc...
Robin, I'm sure you're not the kind of parent who picks up your child and then
physically assaults your husband with child still in arms.
Cuts and bruises can come from a lot of different sources; from running around,
from being beaten, or even from acting out scenes of violence in "play", to
help overcome those helpless feelings that happen when you're made to watch.
|
262.29 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:24 | 27 |
| re: .19/.21
Suzanne's got it right. I she receives equal treatment, the
statistics say that, if arrested, she probably be released on
personal recognizance, plead guilty to a lesser charge (though
in this case it sounds like there wouldn't be enough evidence
for the state to bring an indictment, much less try the case),
and receive a (very short) probated sentence. See you on the
streets. . .
re: some others
I don't find the assault too surprising, because I was raised with
a *very* strict injunction to "Never hit a girl, Son, especially
your sister". Knowing this, my sister, some 2� years younger but
bigger and heavier nonetheless, used to take regular pleasure in
pummeling me. I'd cover up as long as I could but you can't block
every shot everywhere so, after a while I'd lose my cool and whack
her one. Being nobody's dummy, she'd then run to Mom (or worse, Dad)
yelling how I'd hit her; naturally they were duty-bound to apply
some corporeal re-education to my forgetful self. Sheesh! In any
case, the spirit of those days has carried through and it would
require a clear and present mortal danger before I would strike back
at a woman; fortunately for me, I'm bigger now and I can cover and
block with greater efficiency.
Steve
|
262.30 | reply to 26 | BPOV06::MACKINNON | | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:25 | 18 |
|
re. 26
Robin,
I did not come out and say that this woman was abusing her
child. If you go back and read my message I stated that the cuts
and bruises could be due to her age. So please don't take offense
of my statements. I understand that 2 year olds are prone to such
things. But one can not ignore the fact that she has been recieving
more than normal lately. There may be many reasons for this and
yes one of them could be that this woman is inflicting them on this
child. And given her past background (which has always included
violence) one really has to question her for the safety of the
child. Also you have to remember that I am the one that knows
this woman and what she is like. Even given the little information
I have been providing, it would be terribly unfair of you to assume
that you or anyone else knows the whole story.
|
262.31 | Don't let the "SYSTEM" beat you, FIGHT!!!! | CYBORG::TREPANIER | | Thu Aug 11 1988 17:28 | 30 |
| re .o
I feel for your brother, being a divorced and weekend father.
I think he should try to exercise his rights, as a parent and go
for full custody. One thing that people forget is that this state
has an ERA, and that it works for the benefit of men as well as
women. You are right to seek help for your family's plight, and
there are many groups which could help you advocate this issue.
Maybe if you contacted the ACLU, they could put you in touch with
the right group to assist you.
I don't see what discussing the case of some child molester
who didn't get his just punishment has to do with this difficult
and painful situation. The original request was for some help and
guidance, and too many of you are sitting back agape at this all
too common situation. Women are capable of violence and our society
needs to recognize the need to treat battered men the same as battered
women. Today's society recognizes the needs of battered women and
has started to move to provide services such as safe shelters and
easily procurred legal services. We need to throw off the stereotypes
of society, and realize that the cycle of abuse includes women,
and that they can be the abuser as well as the abused. Show this
situation some understanding and compassion, and maybe offer some
constructive advice to help them, that's the forum this notes file
is supposed to provide.
Oh, I feel so much better now, I hope your brother finds some
solace from his anguish by your seeking answers and advice. Part-time
parenting is never easy, but he sounds like a man who loves his
daughter very much, and that will make it worthwhile!!!
|
262.32 | Lets Get It Right | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Fri Aug 12 1988 09:09 | 9 |
| re:31
Er...ah, the guy is the originators boyfriend not brother. Besides
what difference does it make if we bring abuse of any kind into
the note ? The issue has been beaten to death already, and we still
don't have the full picture because we are only getting one side
of the story, which is from the girl friends prespective. The only
advice thats any good is for the guy to let his lawyer handle it.
Jim
|
262.33 | | QUARK::LIONEL | May you live in interesting times | Fri Aug 12 1988 11:21 | 5 |
| Re: .32
I agree - I don't see any benefit from holding a trial in this note.
Steve
|