T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
213.1 | must be an East Coast custom... | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert A. Holt | Tue Mar 01 1988 15:46 | 2 |
|
So, did anyone get asked out..?
|
213.2 | Nope........ | SCUBA::WILTSHIRE | Dave Wiltshire - CSSE (X.25/FCNS) | Tue Mar 01 1988 18:41 | 1 |
|
|
213.3 | no cigar | SPICE1::CHARBONND | What a pitcher! | Wed Mar 02 1988 06:32 | 1 |
| RE .1 I was asked to leave, does that count ? :-)
|
213.4 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert A. Holt | Wed Mar 02 1988 11:55 | 2 |
|
This so-called tradition must be an urban legend..
|
213.5 | As a matter of fact | MEMORY::LYSETH | I'm much smarter in person | Thu Mar 03 1988 11:04 | 12 |
|
As it turns out, Monday morning I received a phone
call here at work. A voice from the past (5 years ago) was
on the other end. She made the usual small talk for a few
minutes and then asked if I would like to get together.
Hmmmmmmmm I said. Why in the world would she decide out of
the clear blue to give me a call and ask me out? It was this
morning, when I logged into Mennotesm, that I got my answer.
In short, YES, some people do believe in that old custom ;-)
Kevin
|
213.6 | teehee | SCOMAN::DAUGHAN | feel like jumpin the gun! | Fri Mar 04 1988 11:27 | 7 |
| i made bob an offer and he turned it down...
so don't feel sorry for him.
so what if i live on the east coast
kelly
|
213.7 | | PIGGY::MCCALLION | | Sat Mar 05 1988 12:56 | 3 |
| On Feb. 29th in 1976 I asked Neil to marry me and his answer
was he didn't know. I told him it was a yes or no question.
We'll be married 12 years this June.
|
213.8 | | BUSY::KLEINBERGER | Vivo, ergo sum | Tue Mar 08 1988 16:25 | 8 |
| Well.. I asked Bob out... we started to have dinner, when an emergency
happened at my house, that I had to go home for....
So.. we didn't get to have dinner together, and now he'll have to
wait four more years to see if anything was planned for after dinner
:-)....
Gale
|
213.9 | that's it - keep 'em guessing.. | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert A. Holt | Tue Mar 08 1988 18:22 | 2 |
|
|
213.10 | by tradition you have the whole year to ask | 17447::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Mar 09 1988 09:21 | 1 |
|
|
213.11 | Is It Safe Yet? | FDCV03::ROSS | | Wed Mar 09 1988 09:55 | 8 |
| RE: .10
Bonnie, does "the whole year" mean that after 31 December 1988,
men can come out of hiding?
Or do we need to lay low through next February 28? :-)
Alan
|
213.12 | | BUSY::KLEINBERGER | Vivo, ergo sum | Wed Mar 09 1988 11:12 | 10 |
| Bonnie,
I know I have the whole year to ask, but I am still that old fashion
female who waits to be asked first :-)
Maybe in four years, if Bob hasn't popped the question, I MAY change
my mind though... We have only been dating for two years (this
month!), so I have quite a long while to go I think...
Gale
|
213.13 | even for cheesecake | SA1794::CHARBONND | JAFO | Wed Mar 09 1988 12:36 | 1 |
| re .8 four years !?!? That's a long time to wait for dessert :-)
|
213.14 | Being more and more absurd | TWEED::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Mar 09 1988 13:15 | 12 |
| re .11
Alan, I think in most cases men can come out of hiding at the
end of 1988. In your case however....perhaps early in the 21st
century? :-) :-)
re .12
Gale, there is always the line that has worked for many others..
"if you asked me to marry you I would say yes."
|
213.15 | Puzzled querise ? | BETA::EARLY | Bob Early CSS/NSG Dtn: 264-6252 | Wed Mar 09 1988 13:23 | 5 |
| re: .11
What do you mean by " ... lay low .... " ?
Bob
|
213.16 | And It's Not Even A Full Moon | FDCV03::ROSS | | Wed Mar 09 1988 15:13 | 13 |
| RE: .14
Bonnie, to be safe, maybe I ought to wait until the middle of the
21'st century. That way, I'll be past my prime, and by then, they
may have even outlawed attorneys. :-)
RE: .15
Bob, ".....lay low...." as in "to hide". But of course, there are
some men who don't mind being exposed. :-) :-)
Alan
|
213.17 | Come out wherever you are... | FSLENG::HEFFERN | really decxps::cjacques | Thu Mar 10 1988 00:53 | 14 |
| aw Alan, come on...lay low? What about all these notes about
woman asking men out, etc.... I thought that was what you were
all waiting for!
I didn't even think of asking someone out on that day (have had
my hands full lately :-) ) but I wouldn't need any special day
to allow me to do it anyway. I'd just need the courage :-}.
I thought that Feb 29 was called Sadie Hawkins day, and that the
rule of the "women ask the men" applied only to that day. Guess
I have to brush up on my Lil' Abner.
cj
|
213.18 | | FDCV03::ROSS | | Thu Mar 10 1988 10:15 | 10 |
| RE: .17
cj, it's not getting asked out that I'm concerned about.
It's answering yes to a proposal of marriage that concerns me
(although I'm sure my lawyer is licking his chops at the
possibility of handling another divorce for me. Visions of
Mercedes are running through his mind right now, I bet. ) :-)
Alan
|
213.19 | In your case, bad news Al | STING::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Wed Mar 23 1988 15:19 | 20 |
|
I've come to the the conclusion that theres too many Bobs
associated to this conference and conversation. One could
really get confused quick :-)
But on the other side, Traditionally via the archives of
Lil' Abner, it is traditionally accecpable and correct that
a woman may ASK a man out during the ENTIRE year of a leep
year. The most significant day thou is leep day, which is
Feb 29 or best known as Saddie Hawkins day. For traditionally
it was accecpable and proper that a woman could ask a man
to MARRY her and he HAD to accept.
So, for any of you that didn't know, thats the story. Thats why
Lil' Abner use to "head for the hills" each Feb 29. Now of course
as for me, if I had Daisy Mae a'chaceing me, I don't think Ide
be running all that fast ;-) As for being asked out by some lady,
the rest of the year, well that remains to be seen ;-)
Bob B.
|
213.20 | | RANCHO::HOLT | | Wed Mar 23 1988 16:22 | 6 |
|
That might have been true when there were 5 eligable F's
to 1 M.
Today its the men who had better be doing the running after
for the tables have turned appreciably.
|
213.21 | It's Only One Day Every Four Years | FDCV03::ROSS | | Wed Mar 23 1988 16:40 | 6 |
| RE: .20
Bob, are you saying there are now 5 eligible males for each
female?
Alan
|
213.22 | | RANCHO::HOLT | | Wed Mar 23 1988 17:16 | 14 |
|
re .21
Not quite 5 to 1 yet. Seems more like 3.5 to 1.
Then again, I can only speak for this immediate
locale (Palo Alto/Northern Santa Clara Co.)
If there are census figures for this (?) I'd
love to see them.
Consider that demographics have changed since
the days of the draft, WorldWar[n], Korea, VN...
|
213.23 | | IPOVAX::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Fri Mar 25 1988 13:11 | 14 |
|
RE Last few ...HUH ?????? The way I understood it was that via
the last nation wide census, there was susposely
something on the order of a ratio of 2.7 women to
men between the ages of 20 - 50. Now that ratio
may vary by geographical area of the country, but
overally there has always been more women then men
on a nation wide basis.
Does anyone out there have the break out of the
actual figures ? Besides that, what would one do
with .7 of a woman ??? :-)
Bob B
|
213.24 | | RANCHO::HOLT | | Fri Mar 25 1988 13:51 | 4 |
|
re .23
Well, that depends on which .7 you have, I guess...hehheheh
|
213.25 | | FSLENG::HEFFERN | | Wed Mar 30 1988 01:56 | 5 |
| I'm convinced there are at least eight eligible women (girls?)
per male out there and they all seem to be between 20 and 25!
cj
|
213.26 | | IPOVAX::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Thu Mar 31 1988 12:27 | 6 |
| RE .25 And not a single one of them is interested
in a man over the age of 30. So where does that
leave those of us that are over 30 to do ??
BB
|
213.27 | I seem to be fishing the wrong pond | SPICE1::CHARBONND | to save all Your clowns | Thu Mar 31 1988 13:56 | 3 |
| RE.25 May I ask where you have discovered this convincing evidence?
Purely for academic reasons, y'all understand.
|
213.28 | I like 'em in their 30's | BSS::BLAZEK | Dancing with My Self | Thu Mar 31 1988 15:11 | 6 |
| re: .26 (BB)
Alas, you are wrong on this one...
Carla
|
213.29 | | IPOVAX::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Thu Mar 31 1988 15:17 | 9 |
|
RE .28 Ahhhh just **what** does "alas" allude to ?????
And should I say it figgures because your in Colorado
and I (we) are out here in New England ...
BB
P.S. What about the 40's people ???
|
213.30 | | PARITY::DDAVIS | Send in the clowns | Thu Mar 31 1988 16:22 | 5 |
| Hey, Bob,
I think the 40's people are absolutely great!
-Dotti D.
|
213.31 | "boys" under 30 have too much to learn... | BLITZN::LITASI | Sherry Litasi | Thu Mar 31 1988 22:55 | 3 |
| I like 'em in their 30's or early 40's if they are young at heart.
Sherry
|
213.32 | What about MEN under 30? | COMET::BRUNO | Beware the Night Writer! | Thu Mar 31 1988 23:10 | 8 |
| Re: .31
> "boys" under 30 have too much to learn...
WATCH IT, LADY!
Greg
|
213.33 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Fri Apr 01 1988 01:11 | 9 |
|
This Man under 30 is not a boy. (A kid at heart but that's
different...) Just ask my over 30 women friends. Like the
one who's one of my best friends. (Yes, you know who you are :-))
Of course, at the moment this Man of 26 is chasing someone younger
:-)
mike
|
213.34 | | GENRAL::SURVIL | d|o|g|i|t|a|l | Fri Apr 01 1988 12:43 | 4 |
|
Geez Mike, that must be a real BEAR! |^)
Todd
|
213.35 | | IPOVAX::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Fri Apr 01 1988 12:54 | 9 |
| RE .30
Gee DD,
How did I know thats exactly what you would think ??
:-) :-) ;-)
BB
|
213.36 | n | PARITY::DDAVIS | Send in the clowns | Fri Apr 01 1988 13:43 | 10 |
|
RE: 35
Tee hee, BB!
-DD
|