T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
172.1 | Here's a couple.. | ANGORA::BUSHEE | George Bushee | Fri Oct 23 1987 15:03 | 8 |
|
1. Could be they didn't percieve the relationship was
going well at all. This could be due to a problem
of communication, like you may have not heard the others
complaints and only looked from your view point.
2. Plain old human nature. Leave it to us humans to screw
things up just when they are going good.
|
172.2 | Is there trust after death? | NHISWS::RYAN_P | | Fri Oct 23 1987 15:13 | 2 |
| How do you get someone to communicate with you, and is there trust
after this?
|
172.3 | There is no pill to make you feel better.. Welcome to life. | AXEL::FOLEY | This is my impressed look | Fri Oct 23 1987 15:18 | 11 |
|
Sounds more like you need counselling and not a bunch of guys/girls
telling you war stories..
Just for the record, if you are asking yourself questions like
in .2 then you really should re-examine alot of things..
Go see your EAP person. They are there to help. (and have)
mike
|
172.4 | Wanting a mans opinion. | NHISWS::RYAN_P | | Fri Oct 23 1987 15:32 | 4 |
| Sorry to bother you my friends, thought I would get some general
information on the subject....... Besides tell me some war stories,
maybe life would be more realistic for some of us romantisists out
here..... You know we do exist.
|
172.5 | ONE-SIDED RELATIONSHIP PERHAPS | LATOUR::KSTEVENS | May your journey be free of incident | Fri Oct 23 1987 16:16 | 9 |
| re:.0
Well, in this situation it strikes me that the relationship must
have only been serious on one-side..... yours.... and the other person
must not have viewed it as going all that well, otherwise they might not
have "strayed".
Ken
|
172.6 | I'm serious about not being serious | TWEED::RICCI | | Fri Oct 23 1987 16:23 | 8 |
| Very well put. Even if he is "serious" about you (I have doubts)
he may have a different perception of what that means. Not everyone
plays by the same rules. You should seek support (eap is outstanding)
to help YOU...see things more clearly.
Good luck
Bob
|
172.7 | | TUBORG::WOLBACH | | Fri Oct 23 1987 19:27 | 37 |
| I think I understand the question. Having asked the
same question myself. And forgive me please if I
generalize:
It seems that men (insert some/many; often/usually/occa-
sionally; might/may where appropriate) can be in a
serious relationship-dating, married, living together-
and be committed to the woman, yet have one night stands,
flings, affairs, and yet still profess to love the woman,
not want to lose her, not want to end the relationship...
This is incomprehensible to me. Men seem to be able to
separate their physical selves, or perhaps their egos,
from their emotional selves...I just don't understand
WHY a man would be attracted to another woman, WHY a man
would have what is termed a 'purely physical' relationship
when he has a perfectly satisfactory emotional relation-
ship ongoing. It seems that some men just need their
egos stroked. That no relationship, no woman, can meet
that need...that some men just need the conquest, the
thrill, the ego building (although how much can it build
one's ego to know that a woman chose to have casual sex
and would probably have casual sex with just anyone?)
You didn't ask for advice. From your base note, including
your 'signature', I think I can empathize with you....I
think I know how you feel and what you are going thru.
If advice is wanted, I'll be happy to followup. Or send
me mail if you would prefer.
Deb
P.S. Glad you asked the question. As I said, I've been
wondering myself for the longest time.
sex with just about anyone had sex with
|
172.8 | Lousy handling | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 26 1987 08:52 | 24 |
|
Let's see if I can add some ridiculous reasons -
1. Fear. "Is this all there is?...that may be my "last
chance"...forever is a long time"
2. Defiance. "I'm supposed to behave per social specification"
3. Ego. "Hey, I'm so cool, watch me pull the wool over their eyes"
"I can get away with it - risking everything"
4. Satisfaction. "I need _______" (fill in blank with what you couldnt
imagine...or havent yet)
5. Adventure. "Life's so dull and routine...think I'll go romancing
the stone"
6. Revenge. "So I cant have my Behemouth Mark III's in the living
room, eh? I'll fix ya -"
As you can see, most of these lousy reasons are really lousy
handling of basic human emotions. I'm sure more could be added.
|
172.9 | Men don't own the whole show here. | ANGORA::BUSHEE | George Bushee | Mon Oct 26 1987 08:58 | 10 |
|
RE: .7
Hate to burst your bubble Deb, but men aren't the only
ones to have sexual encounters outside of their relationships.
I've been down that road myself, and it was after 12 1/2 years.
When asked, her only comment "had to find out what it was like
to be with someone else". Well, she found out, and then had
to stick with the other "someone" elses.... :^)
|
172.10 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Mon Oct 26 1987 11:01 | 9 |
| Oh, George, I didn't mean to imply that men are the only
ones who cheat. I was simply looking at the situation
from a woman's point of view, with the woman being the
"injured party". Also, I think men fool around for dif-
ferent reasons. Either way, I have no respect for the
deceitful partner, or for a 'third party' who would knowingly
bring pain into the life of an innocent person.
|
172.11 | My opinion from yrs. of experience | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | You might think I'm crazy | Mon Oct 26 1987 11:25 | 42 |
| Re .7, I agree that it seems that many/some men seem to "want their
cake and eat it too".
I want to make one comment on something you said. You said that
some men may need the constant reassurance of conquest. I agree
that that does seem to be the case with some men. However, you
go on to say that how casual sex can provide this, you don't
understand. You make the comment that if the "other woman" would
have casual sex with them, she probably would with anybody. This
is a common assumption that really upsets me. Just because a woman
has sex with one man who doesn't happen to really love her back,
doesn't mean that she would have casual sex with just anybody.
It could just mean that she loved him or at least was liked him
a lot and he was just having casual sex. There is such a thing
as one sided love and/or attraction. I think men sometimes take
advantage of women who really care for them just to have a little
extra sex. Maybe some women do this too, but I think more women
are out for serious relationships than just having a lot of casual
sex. Men do seem to find more enjoyment in casual sex than women
do.
Surveys (I don't remember where or who - just remember reading it
and thinking I agreed) show that men who cheat are usually just
looking for a piece on the side and don't really want to end the
marriage/relationship, but that women who cheat are usually
dissillusioned with the present relationship and are really out
there looking for a new serious relationship.
It seems to me that men find it easier to totally separate sex and
love. I think that some men can meet a woman and want to have sex
with her, and to them it has nothing to do with the fact that they
love someone else. It's a different thing - like a sport or something
they enjoy for a hobby. I've met a couple of women like this but
not as many as I have men. Most women want the people they have
sex with to care about them. Men usually hope they won't.
It does to hurt to think of somebody you love having sex with somebody
else, and I don't know what anybody can do about that, except not
think about it.
Lorna
|
172.12 | | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Mon Oct 26 1987 12:07 | 18 |
| re .10 (I think)
"No respect for the third party"
The third party (calling her Woman2) is not responsible for the
happiness of the other couple (Man1 and Woman1). If Man1 wants
to go mess around, endangering his relationship with Woman1, that's
his business, not Woman2's. It is after all HIS marital status,
not Woman2's.
As far as trust is concerned... that depends. If your SO has an
extramarital affair without telling, yes that is a breach of trust.
But if your SO has an affair and tells you about it as soon as
possible, is THAT a breach of trust? Can you honestly say that
you would rather know about the affair than be left in the dark?
I would, but the choice is not that easy.
Good Luck-- Lee
|
172.13 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Mon Oct 26 1987 12:21 | 18 |
| Lorna, when I used the term "casual sex", I meant casual
for both parties. Therefore, a woman who would have an
overnight fling with one man and never see him again,
would be participating in "casual sex" and men (some)
consider this an ego boost and frankly I think it's quite
the opposite ie insulting. Now, a woman engaged in inti-
mate relations with a man she loves or cares for, regard-
less of HIS feelings, is not having "casual sex".
I agree very much with the rest of what you said. Men and
women seem to 'use' physical intimacy for different reasons.
I especially agree with your comment about men cheating for
physical or ego satisfaction and women cheating because they
are dissatisfied with their current relationship.
Deb
|
172.14 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Mon Oct 26 1987 12:30 | 10 |
| Lee, I was not implying that Woman2 was responsible
for the happiness of Woman1 and Man1. I WAS stating
that I have no respect for any person who would de-
liberately bring pain into the life of another person.
Man1 can certainly find Woman* to 'cheat' with, but I
still maintain that I have no respect for the woman
who would knowingly participate. I take the golden
rule to heart...
|
172.16 | | COLORS::MODICA | | Mon Oct 26 1987 13:31 | 3 |
| Many people also cheat because their spouse has "let themselves
go". A lot of people, once married, stop trying to maintain their
physical attractiveness.
|
172.17 | My 2 cents worth.. | ELMO::COWERN | Thomas | Mon Oct 26 1987 16:17 | 17 |
| RE: .11
> It does to hurt to think of somebody you love having sex with somebody
> else, and I don't know what anybody can do about that, except not
> think about it.
What one can do is go to a therapist to begin working through those
feelings of disappointment, anger, frustration and whatever else she/he
may be feeling. If not a therapist, anyone who will listen sincerely and
make an effort to help the individual. Start with EAP..
I don't think all men cheat, and I don't think all women cheat. I think
the reasons for cheating are as varied as the numbers and the individuals.
-Thomas
|
172.18 | Who am I to blow against the wind? | OPHION::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Tue Oct 27 1987 00:03 | 47 |
| Just to introduce a (possibly) different viewpoint.
The fact that a spouse is having sex with someone other than their
spouse is not automatically evil.
From this obviously outrageous statement, you can deduce that I
believe it is possible to have an open marriage, and furthermore
that love does not equal possesion. I grant that not everyone is
so gifted, but it *is* possible to love more than one person.
On the other hand, if both partners have agreed "forsaking all others"
then "playing around" is bad. Have we agreed to limit the discussion
to "cheating", that is, sex outside of an *exclusive* relationship
while acknowledging that not all relationships are exclusive?
If so, I'll take a crack a the harder question:
Why do people cheat?
Well, my own personal feeling, backed up by talking to both "cheaters"
and "cheated on" is that men and women cheat for different reasons.
(Gasp! How un-PC!) Women *usually* "cheat" because they feel unloved,
unappreciated, or because they miss intimacy. Cuddling, talking,
feeling good with another person. The "other person" makes them
feel good *about* *themselves*. Men, on the other hand, usually
"cheat" for sex. Physical pleasure, the feeling of conquest, and
the affirmation of their masculinity.
I once read an interesting survey about what constituted "cheating"
(infidelity). There was a range of things, including such things as
fanstasizing about someone else, kissing someone else, hugging, being
naked with, having dinner alone with, having sex with, touching etc.
The question was what actually constituted "infidelity". The range of
responses, and the breakdown by sex and age was fascinating.
My criterion is simple. If you've agreed not to do it, and you do,
that's bad. If you haven't talked about it, then you've got problems
waiting to happen. My spouse and I have talked about it, and we have
agreed on what is acceptable and what isn't. One thing we have agreed
is to talk about things FIRST. We've agreed, spontaneous "casual"
sex is NOT allowed. I don't feel comfortable describing further
details of our relationship in such a public forum, especially one
as judgemental as this one.
It's worked for us for 12 years.
-- Charles
|
172.19 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | You might think I'm crazy | Tue Oct 27 1987 10:20 | 8 |
| Re .18, Charles, I definitely think you're right about the different
reasons why men and women cheat. There are a few exceptions for
both men and women, but mostly I think they fall into the categories
you describe. I feel this way because of conversations I've had
with friends and my own experience.
Lorna
|
172.20 | sort of off track but... | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Maybe, baby, the gypsy lied | Tue Oct 27 1987 12:04 | 10 |
| re .16 my experience has been the opposite - when I see a woman
dressed tastefully, with a nice neat hairdo and simple makeup, it
always turns out she's married. the single women try to outdo each
other in tastelessness (read fashion) these days. it's gotten so
i don't have to check for rings anymore ;-)/2
Of course, there *are* exceptions, and seeking them out is well
worth doing.
I'd have to add that a lot of married guys seem to get pot-gutted
in a hurry.
|
172.21 | Because .... | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Thu Oct 29 1987 13:13 | 3 |
| re: .0
Because its their nature to do so ...........
|
172.22 | re. 21 | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Maybe, baby, the gypsy lied | Thu Oct 29 1987 14:13 | 1 |
| As non-explanatory as "instinct"
|
172.23 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Let's remove the heart | Thu Oct 29 1987 14:37 | 4 |
|
re Bob E
Whose nature?
|
172.24 | "Yer Cheatin' Heart" | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Nov 03 1987 13:35 | 62 |
| "Mean Gene" you sound sometimes like your talking tongue-in-cheek
but even if you are I like your ideas! You absolutely have to "build
your own walls" and "protect yourself" for the simple reason that
we cannot make another person act the way we want them to - ever.
All the general reasons given here why men cheat and why women cheat
are right on. But the reason this particular person in question
cheated can be found in the relationship. Is it generally good?
Then I'd suspect the conquest-type or ego-stroking reasons. Is
he withdrawn? Cool? Then I'd suspect the looking-for-someone-else
reasons. Did you piss him off recently? Then I'd suspect the revenge
reasons.
The general whys and wherefores mean very little in the way of help
in one's particular situation. Stop and really think about your
relationship and you'll probably click on the answer.
Is there trust afterwards? Sometimes. It depends on first the
reason he cheated. Cheating for revenge for instance makes for
a tougher situation than cheating for ego-stroking. How much real
love there is on both sides has to be determined, and then your own ego
has to be explored. Could you live with it if everything else
were ok? And of course your lover's reaction to getting caught
is a prime source of information for you. Is he contrite? Is
he angry at YOU for catching him, (don't laugh - this is a common
reaction of the embarassed, caught cheater)? Is he silent and just
leaving you to deal with the pain? I'd begin with his reaction
and work backward with him through his reasons finishing at your
mutual perception of the relationship and investment in it.
Is the "other" woman at any fault at all? I've heard this reasoning
from many of my female friends. In a desperate desire to strike
out and blame somebody, women have said to me, "What kind of woman would
DO such a thing?" Or, "She KNEW he was living with me - what is
she, stupid?"
Get your mind off the woman, who has no obligation to you whatsoever,
on onto your man, who does. Whether this woman sleeps with whoever
is the last customer in the bar or whether she was a virgin until
seduced by your lover makes no difference at all. She is either
free to sleep with whomever she wants or she must answer to HER
lover. In any case she does not need to answer to you. Wasting
time imagining what kind of slut she must be is pointless.
It's corny to say, but this kind of situation CAN be positive.
Your lover could realize that a quick fling isn't as quick as he
thought it was and could decide from real knowledge that it just
isn't for him. He may be much wiser next time. You will have the
knowledge that your man is faithful because HE wants to be and not
just going through the motions to keep you sleeping with him.
And really, I've even heard men say that sex with love beats everything
else, hands down. She may be strange, she may even be hot, but you're
the incumbent and he is without a doubt more comfortable in bed
with you.
And one final thought - the only exchange is fidelity for fidelity.
If he takes his away you can't make him give it back. You can only
take yours away. That's the only power you have. If you love him
and think the relationship has a chance, save it as your last resort.
Just don't be a doormat and think your fidelity will breed the same
in an otherwise distracted male.
|
172.25 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Tue Nov 03 1987 13:46 | 12 |
| <standing ovation>
.24
How do you always manage to say "just the right thing" and in just
the right words???
With much respect-
D.
|
172.26 | blush... | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Nov 03 1987 15:05 | 5 |
| Well thank you, but there are those who don't agree with you!
:-)
Sandy
|
172.27 | We Wouldn't Get Along | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Tue Nov 03 1987 15:19 | 7 |
|
re: .26
I almost never agree with you, but that seemed pretty spot-on to
me.
DFW
|
172.28 | a little insight goes a long way... | ELMO::COWERN | Thomas | Wed Nov 04 1987 08:59 | 23 |
| RE: 24, & 26
I agree with you. Coming from the standpoint that I'm in a relationship
right now and not quite certain what is "wrong" with it. I haven't been able
to identify what the problem is despite making an effort to discuss it with
the other half. There is little communication coming from the other half, a
lot of silence and withdrawl. Perhaps an infidelity is the issue. I don't
know and I don't know what to do because of the lack of communication. For a
little backround my SO just returned form a four city business trip through
the far east and returned a different person. Which leads me to believe that
something happened on this business trip. When I've made an effort to dis-
cuss the "problem" all I get is, "everything is fine, I'm tired, it was a
tough trip...". It's very frustrating.
I've decided I'm not going to react and to simply take it one day at a
time. We don't live together which compounds it. I feel if we were living
together and sleeping in the same bed every night it might help to open up
the communication. Simply by default that we were together more. As it is
now it seems we're back to square one, newly dating and going through all
of the common courtesies of "how about dinner on Friday night...". And then
wondering what the other is doing the rest of the week.. sigh..
Suggestions? Comments? -Thomas
|
172.29 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Wed Nov 04 1987 11:44 | 17 |
| Thomas-if she refuses to discuss it with you, then you are at
a stalemate. You'll either accept the status quo or leave...
To play devil's advocate-perhaps she is telling you the truth.
Maybe she really is 'just tired'. Coincidentally, last night
I read an article in Ladies Home Journal (it was either last
month's or the current issue), about women that are "too tired
for sex". It discusses women and their reaction to fatigue and
stress. It also mentions that women react differently to these
negative influences. And that men sometimes don't understand.
Perhaps you could locate this article. Perhaps it would be help-
ful to you. Of course, I may be way off base on this, but it's
worth a shot, right?
Deb
|
172.30 | reply to .23 | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Wed Nov 04 1987 12:32 | 16 |
| re: .23
You asked me "Whose nature ? "
>Why would someone in a serious relationship that is going very
>well be unfaithful, to that person?
When the nebulous "someone" is unfaithful to someone else who thinks
the relationship is going well; it may be because it is the NATURE
of the unfaithful to do so !
(Why else does an unfaithful companion be unfaithful if its not
in their nature to be so ?)
Bob
|
172.31 | A few more details.. | ELMO::COWERN | Thomas | Wed Nov 04 1987 12:48 | 36 |
|
re; 29
Thank you, Deb. I haven't read/seen the article, but will
look for it.
I should have been more clear in my initial message, when
we met at the airport on Saturday night it was like a different per-
son, based upon what I dropped off a week prior. I'd have imagined
that after a few days the "fatigue" would have subsided, after all
this is Wednesday.. Sex really wasn't the issue, the issue was we
were not communicating like we had, we were not expressing affection,
or happiness to see one another after a week long trip where we
couldn't even really communicate by telephone due to time difference.
I'm having a difficult time understanding how such a dramatic change
in personality (committment?) could happen in seven days. It is like
night and day. Before the trip we discussed all sorts of plans for the
future and now it is nothing.. no telephone calls, no dinner dates, no
weekends away, no "quiet" time just for us.. we haven't even seen one
another since Sunday and I haven't received one telephone call.. I've
called and left messages on the recorder but haven't had one return
call.. I've never been so tired that I couldn't pick up the telephone
and call the person I've been dating for several months.. especially
after being away for a week and only seeing them once since returning
home. It doesn't make sense..
When we do speak next I will have confront some of these issues
and deal with them, if it means letting go, then I will and I'll have to
live with that. Difficult and painful as it will be.. I do know that I
don't want to go through this every time after a separation in the future.
It isn't worth it..
-Thomas
|
172.32 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Wed Nov 04 1987 18:24 | 15 |
| Oh, I should have been more clear. While the article does
deal with sexual issues, it also touches on communication
and emotional issues, since emotions and sex often work
hand in hand (what did THAT mean?)
Anyway, you're right. Her behavior doesn't make sense. I think
it just doesn't make sense to you because you don't have all the
information necessary to make it clear. Sounds like she is with-
holding valuable info...
Deb
Still a good article to read
|
172.34 | | NEXUS::R_JOHNSON | This is it! | Sat Nov 07 1987 15:07 | 22 |
| re: .31 Just a thought. I spent about 2 weeks in Panama shortly after my
wife and I were married. I don't know if youv'e ever been to a Third World
country or not, but being there had a *dramatic* effect on me. I had to deal
with situations you only see on the news. Anyway the point is that when I got
home my wife had missed me terribly, and was ready to spend hours totally
consumed in each other. I, on the other hand, was dealing with the total
differences in lifestyles, culture, freedom, and basically the realization that
the life I was leading was not the standard for the rest of the world. In
other words I was feeling and thinking on a life/ death philosophic level, my
wife was thinking and feeling on the together- ness, intemate level - and never
the twain shall meet. It took me a good deal of time to get back to normal and
it was a little ruff because she kept asking me what was wrong, was it her,
didn't I love her anymore, and I tried to tell her that there was nothing wrong
with us, I just couldn't explain to her all that I was feeling; I was still in
sensory overload.
Maybe you need to give it some more time and support. I would recommend not
pushing too hard, just a little knudge now and then to test the water. Of
course you can't wait for ever but what seems like a long time to you might
seem like a blink to her. Hang in there!
Rick
|