T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
145.1 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Wed Sep 02 1987 11:37 | 15 |
| re .0:
Is it you, the article, or your interpretation of the article
that appears to equate "pretty" women with "dumb" women?
As an aside, I've been wondering why smart women like dumb
men. Is it because women who hold powerful position like to
be seen/associated with Schwarzenegger types? Or is it that
a smart man is too much for a woman to handle when she is feeling
stressed out?
Or are the questions in .0 as dumb (because of the implicit
generalizations) as those in the previous paragraph?
--Mr Topaz
|
145.2 | Oh don't worry, it not turned on. | HYDRA::LYMAN | Village Idiot | Wed Sep 02 1987 13:14 | 11 |
|
Re: .0
I think that dumb women are alot more relaxed and receptive
to new ideas and techniques, whereas smart women are always
asking stupid questions like; how come we gotta wear these silly
outfits, or whats that hanging from your ceiling, or whats that
Video camera for. Smart, power crazed guys like myself just
don't need that kinda hassle.
Jake
|
145.3 | Dumb = Boring!!! | CASV01::SALOIS | Bring out yer dead! | Wed Sep 02 1987 13:27 | 26 |
|
Smart men + dumb women = 1 very short relationship.
I consider myself to be smart (no comments from the peanut gallery!)
and could not consider a relationship with someone who did not possess
an approximately equal intelligence.
If I wanted to impress people with my partner, I would definately
prefer a partner who could carry on an intelligent conversation.
Intelligence can be very appealing.
Looks are important! So is intelligence! Beauty is a fleeting
possession, yet intelligence survives.
I would take offense if you are implying that beauty and intelligence
cannot not be found in one person, as your equation seems to suggest.
Intelligence + Beauty = My kind of woman
Intelligence > Beauty/Dumb
Then again, this is only my opinion. I am sure there are those
men just looking for a nice ass, but that particular behavior, to
me denotes a lack of intelligence, n'est pas?
Smart men/Dumb women is an anomaly at best!
Mean Gene!
|
145.4 | NOT ME | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Sep 02 1987 13:36 | 7 |
| Oops! Clarification....
It was the article that equated beatiful with dumb, not me!
(In fact I found their assumption that beautiful women may
play dumb to catch a 'powerful' man offensive...but that
wasn't what I wanted to discuss by starting this note).
|
145.5 | Wanted, clear thinking companion. | ZENSNI::HOE | | Wed Sep 02 1987 14:07 | 23 |
| I regret that the assumption that smart men equates to power. Smart
[intelligent] people does not need a dumb person around them to
have to think for them.
Gary Hart got a Floosy and immediately self destruct his career.
I believe that charismatic men attract woman who thinks that these
people can "bootstrap" their life into a fantesy; reality, Hart
needed a steady woman with him to help him through the rough times
when the world is falling around him.
Ronnie has a very traditional supportive woman with him as does
Gary Hart.
Queen Elizabeth has a very supportive man with her; neither need
a Floosy to destroy their relation. One of my ex female friends
used her sexuality to get her way when it was convenient, I had
thought that if we work at it, she would turn it around to let her
intelligence shine; alas, the basic, easy approach won out. Her
man this day, a power grubbing army major.
Who needs a dumb woman/man when the walls are falling around you?
/cal
|
145.6 | | NEVADA::HOLT | Where to, Mr. Peabody? | Wed Sep 02 1987 16:30 | 11 |
|
I used to think that people wanted mates of similar
intellectual MIPS rating. What I see often contradicts
this.
Often I get the impression that women would like someone
controllable, but not necessarily 'dumb'.
When I see some couples together, my reaction is 'How does
a zhlub like that get an angel like her..?'
|
145.8 | out of his mouth | STRATA::DAUGHAN | sassy | Wed Sep 02 1987 22:22 | 5 |
| asked the male member of this household he said: does not have to
come home and "compete" like in the office.he said some men would
like to go home and relax not have to be intellectually stimulating.
kelly
|
145.9 | | COMET::BRUNO | | Wed Sep 02 1987 23:07 | 7 |
|
Sounds like that's the gist of it. Some guys don't like to
be constantly challenged. Perhaps the ability to say something
incorrect, without being corrected, is important.
Greg
|
145.10 | | NEVADA::HOLT | Where to, Mr. Peabody? | Thu Sep 03 1987 01:36 | 9 |
| re .7
This is true enough. Men do react strangely when confronted
by new life realities. There is an unconcious desire sometimes
to test a relationship before becoming fully immersed. But
it is more acceptable (to the man) to mask this behind a cloak
of 'females out to get me'.
A fixed eye-stare and some sharp words by the woman usually
bring a break or a bond, depending on circumstances.
|
145.11 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Gone fishin' | Thu Sep 03 1987 07:25 | 1 |
| re .0 How do they define "smart" men ? Or "dumb" women ?
|
145.12 | | MOSAIC::MODICA | | Thu Sep 03 1987 10:38 | 11 |
| RE: .11 Good question! Some of the smartest (my opinion) people
I know didn't finish high school, yet their wisdom about
life constantly impresses me.
Sounds like societal labeling to me. If you're successful
then you must be smart. If you're a housewife, you can't
be. Well, that kind of thinking burns my fanny!
To answer the question anyhow, It seems to me that you've
got to be damn insecure if you want to be with someone
who always makes you look like an einstein.
|
145.16 | the woman at home..... | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Sep 03 1987 11:54 | 16 |
| re .14, Suzanne, I was interested in your example about coming
home to a person who is not being intellectually stimulated...
one of the examples in the article was a man who was a doctor who
had taken up with an air headed girl friend because the intellectual
demands of his wife who was home with a new baby were too much for
him! (that is my definition of a creep, by the way!).
In general, the 'smart' men described in the article were either
politicians like Gary Hart or the Kennedys, or successful business
men, doctors, or lawyers.
Me I am not so sure that any of them are what I would consider
truely 'smart' in the broader sense of the word. :-)
Bonnie
|
145.17 | | MPGS::MCCLURE | Why Me??? | Thu Sep 03 1987 13:17 | 16 |
| .0 brings to mind an old limbo song of the 60s; If you want to be
happy for the rest of your life...
Seriously, could this outward manifestation actually be an indication
of dominant/submissive roles? The real problem here is the perception
that if one partner is attractive and the other is not, then one
of them is 'dumb' and one is 'smart'. I have encountered the situation
described in .0, where the 'pretty' one is an airhead, but I have
also encountered the reverse. There are other factors such as; the
less attractive person may have a nice personality, the less
intelligent person has a nice personality, the more intelligent/
more attractive one has a lowered self esteem and figures this is
the best that they can do. The article is a generalization that
should offend the sensibilities of any intelligent person!
Bob Mc
|
145.18 | intelligent, but dumb-acting | ULTRA::GUGEL | Don't read this. | Thu Sep 03 1987 15:47 | 7 |
| re -1:
That's sort of what I was thinking too. How about the intelligent
woman who "acts dumb" (my mother, for example) and therefore
her husband has no trouble controlling or dominating the relationship.
-Ellen
|
145.19 | from the horses mouth | LUDWIG::DAUGHAN | sassy | Thu Sep 03 1987 17:28 | 7 |
| re.13
thats the answer i got when i asked a man.
i actually did not think he would take the question seriously.
he said he has been invovled with both"types" of women and has been
quite happy with both.
kelly
|
145.20 | re .16: Kennedy? Hart?? SMART??? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Thu Sep 03 1987 18:04 | 1 |
|
|
145.21 | thats the examples the article gave.... | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Sep 03 1987 19:46 | 1 |
|
|
145.22 | One IS in charge. | COMET::BRUNO | | Fri Sep 04 1987 02:15 | 10 |
|
I think 'dumb & smart' are also being confused with 'passive
& agressive'. I know female halves of couples who behave passively
in order to accord their husbands a measure of dominance, yet who
are able to compete (actively) with those outside of the relationship.
As much as we may wish for it, I have yet to see a truly balanced
relationship.
Greg
|
145.23 | | RUTLND::SATOW | | Fri Sep 04 1987 14:20 | 30 |
| re: .20,.21
If that's the examples they used then I think that they are using `smart' and
`dumb' in an extremely imprecise way. Donna Rice came across to me a an
intelligent, attractive woman with bad judgment. Gary Hart came across as an
arrogant, whiny, crybaby. Even people who were close to Gary Hart were quoted
as saying that they couldn't believe he was being so `stupid'. Smart man
indeed.
Generally, I think that it has more to do with wanting to avoid responsibility
than wanting to avoid intellectual stimulation. If you keep track of the
amount of time at work that you are truly being intellectually stimulated, I'd
be surprised if it's more than 10% of the time. But even if we're talking
about the middle manager sitting at a desk mindlessly filling out forms and
revising his budget for the 345th time, he's still RESPONSIBLE (male pronoun
used intentionally since it's what the base note talks about). He goes home
to a family and, you guessed it, more responsibility.
But the stereotypical dumb but sexy mistress represents release from
responsibility; in fact this type of affair represents an irresponsible act --
a rebellion AGAINST responsibility. It's the same type of man who wants a
wife from a culture in which the wife is totally submissive, runs the house,
and all the husband's responsibility is to provide (which in our culture means
bring home a paycheck).
The other factor is that powerful people often have delusions of
infallibility; they can't do anything wrong, but if they do, they won't get
caught, but if they get caught, they can explain it away.
Clay
|
145.24 | | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at large | Fri Sep 11 1987 13:32 | 13 |
| RE: .0 I haven't read any of the replies but I'd like to
reply to .0.
I heard a saying once that "First class people hire first class
people. Second class people hire third class people." I think
that point 2 in the base note relates to this well. Only a dumb
or insecure man would have a dumb woman for a wife/SO.
I think that my wife is smarter then I am. I don't see any disadvantage
to that condition. In fact, I think it helps me a lot. A dumb wife
wouldn't be able to understand or help nearly as much.
Alfred
|
145.25 | | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Fri Sep 11 1987 13:42 | 10 |
| Re .24
� I heard a saying once that "First class people hire first class
� people. Second class people hire third class people."
ooohhh *sting*!
Nice.
Lee
|
145.26 | Lifes Miseries abound all around... | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Fri Oct 02 1987 09:05 | 32 |
| re: .24, .25
If FIRST class people hire FIRST class people, and SECOND class
people hire THIRD class people, WHO hired the SECOND class person?
I think Art Linkletter (not the DECcie Linkletter) said it best
when he said: "From the mouths of babes come what their parents
say".
re: .0 et al
I've only met one "dumb" woman on my life. One couldn't hear or
speak, but made more money than me (at that time); but eventually
learned to speak very well.
Later in life I learned an enigmatic puzzle which still confuses
me: "Why do so many sensitive, charming, beautiful women marry far
below their 'true' worth; then spend the rest of their lives
complaining about it ?" ;^)
Perhaps, another observation parially answers that question: "There
seems to be more people who stay all winter in Mass and complain
about the weather than there are who go south and enjoy Floridas
'good weather'.
Ce la vie'. Lifes misteries abound all around
Bob+3
|
145.27 | The answer | AKOV05::EARLS | | Tue Oct 06 1987 19:53 | 2 |
| The only reason smart men go out with dumb women is because of there
EGO. They do not want anyone looking better than them.
|
145.28 | Insert a little humor | FIDDLE::MITCHELL | Fiddle-sticks | Mon Dec 14 1987 21:10 | 9 |
|
A man asked the Lord, "Why did you make women sooo soft?" and the Lord
replied, "So YOU would like them", and then the man asked, "Why did you
make women sooo beautiful?", and again the Lord replied, "So YOU would like
them", and continuing the man asked, "But why did you make them so stupid?"
and the Lord replied, "So they would like YOU" !
|
145.29 | | CEODEV::FAULKNER | GOD, drives a camaro. | Tue Dec 15 1987 11:51 | 2 |
| re.28
What about the rest of us ?
|
145.30 | Check the Barn | HYDRA::LYMAN | Village Idiot | Tue Dec 15 1987 17:39 | 9 |
|
Re: .29
> What about the rest of us ?
God made dumb animals!
Jake
|
145.31 | Aw . name one dumb animal ???????? besides a noter ;^) | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Thu Dec 17 1987 12:07 | 7 |
| re: .28
Is that why I'm so stupid ?
re: .29
Theres plenty to go around ........... ;^)
|
145.32 | y | FIDDLE::MITCHELL | Fiddle-sticks | Thu Dec 17 1987 13:56 | 13 |
| re: .29 & .31
I didn't mean to offend anyone. It is a joke that a man sent me
and I thought a little humor in here would be nice. Evidently
I thought wrong, and there is no place for humor in Mennotes
either.
Sorry.....If you wish I will delete the entry.
I don't want it to start a bashing session between men and
women...there is too much of that already going on in another
conference.
kathie
|
145.33 | | PENUTS::PENNINGTON | Once, I was a Yuppie... | Fri Dec 18 1987 09:41 | 4 |
| No, don't delete it. I liked it.
And also, yes a little humor is needed.
Lighten up you all!
-fjp-
|
145.34 | Another vote FOR | RDGENG::MOXLEY | But Boss, this IS work-related | Fri Dec 18 1987 12:50 | 6 |
|
I liked it too..told my girlfriend and SHE liked it!
Si
|
145.35 | Its really funny ....... ;^) | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Wed Dec 23 1987 12:19 | 7 |
| re: .32, --> re: .31 --- re: .28
No No don't delete it !!!!!!!!!
Its hilarious , really ........... :^)
Bob+3
|
145.36 | Unt unt, dont touch that delete button | MORGAN::BARBER | Skyking Tactical Services | Wed Dec 23 1987 17:15 | 2 |
|
Don't you dare deleate it, it does fit a whole bunch of us ;-)
|
145.37 | | XCELR8::POLLITZ | | Thu Dec 31 1987 08:58 | 3 |
| Yeah, *some* of us! :-)
Russ
|
145.38 | Savor the differences | SCOMAN::OTENTI | | Sun Jan 17 1988 23:05 | 12 |
| Some women are dumb. Some men are dumb. A fact of life.
I think men perceive women to be dumb because of different values or ways
of thinking, if you will. For example, my wife can (and does) go on
endlessly about the curtains she wants to buy. I think this is dumb. She
on the other hand looks at me with pity when I start expounding on how
stupid such and such a coach was for calling a certain play.
Maybe a poor example but men and women *do* think differently. We have to
accept this in a non-judgemental way, I'm much better at this now than I
was in my early twenties. Sometimes I wonder how my wife has put up with
me for 12 years.....
|
145.39 | what is smart? | POBOX::ARMOUR | | Thu Jul 30 1992 14:47 | 6 |
| The test of how smart a person is how much they agree with you.
Hanging around "dumb" people is a pain, no matter what they look like.
mca
|
145.40 | say what? | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Thu Jul 30 1992 17:26 | 12 |
|
>> The test of how smart a person is how much they agree with you.
First of all, this isn't a complete sentence.
>> Hanging around "dumb" people is a pain, no matter what they look like.
How can you make such a blanket statement? Incredible.
Hanging around with "smart" people can be an unbelievable pain
at times too (no matter what they look like).
|
145.41 | | BRADOR::HATASHITA | Hard wear engineer | Thu Jul 30 1992 18:38 | 3 |
| Yeah. Dum peeple got rites to, y'know.
At leased I think we do.
|
145.43 | | OLYMP::BENZ | Service(d) with a smile | Wed Aug 12 1992 10:13 | 2 |
| sometimes hanging around note-files is more painfull than hanging
around either smart or dumb people.
|
145.44 | worst of both worlds | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:33 | 7 |
|
>> sometimes hanging around note-files is more painfull than hanging
>> around either smart or dumb people.
Well, yeah, because it's like hanging around smart AND dumb
people at the same time.
|
145.45 | re -1: smart | OLYMP::BENZ | Service(d) with a smile | Thu Aug 13 1992 07:53 | 1 |
|
|