[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference quark::mennotes-v1

Title:Topics Pertaining to Men
Notice:Archived V1 - Current file is QUARK::MENNOTES
Moderator:QUARK::LIONEL
Created:Fri Nov 07 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jan 26 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:867
Total number of notes:32923

129.0. "Do men have a "biological clock" too?" by QUARK::LIONEL (We all live in a yellow subroutine) Thu Jul 09 1987 17:31

    We frequently hear about women having a "biological clock", where
    they start to worry about having children as they get older.
    
    How about men?  Do men have a similar desire to have children
    if they are approaching 40 and have none, or want more, and are
    single?  Yes, of course men stay fertile through their 70's
    sometimes, and yes they can marry younger women, but I think
    that most men would seek a woman near their own age for a wife.
    
    This thought has occurred to me occasionally.  I am 32 and single,
    and while I have one child already I would really like to have
    another.  As I get older, the women I am attracted to are older,
    and may approach an age where having children is either difficult
    or just undesireable.  So I feel a bit of tension and a desire
    to hurry a bit, just like women who feel their time is running
    out.
    
    I know I'm not the only man who feels this way, at least one
    of my male friends does too.  Anyone else?  Comments?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
129.1VCQUAL::THOMPSONNoter at largeThu Jul 09 1987 18:0025
    I don't know if men do or not but I do know that I'm starting
    to have the same feelings that Steve describes. I'll be 34
    this summer and though my wife and I have one child already
    I'm starting to feel the urge (need seems strong) to have a
    second. 
    
    It's sort of the feeling that if we're going to have another
    we should do it soon. It may be tied into the thought process,
    not all of which is conscious, that I don't want to be too old
    when its just my wife and I again. I love my son but I know
    he'll leave one day. When it happens I want to be able (strong,
    healthy) to enjoy myself.
    
    Also I get times when I have this feeling that one is not enough.
    Enough for what? Hard question to answer. I think it's the age
    old situation of wanting someone to carry on the name/family etc
    after I'm gone and is one child enough to do that. Now my brother
    and sister also have children (she married a man name Thompson so
    her son will carry the name on too it that really mattered) but
    neither of them are the child of my wife and I. It's *our* family
    I'd like to see continue rather then my fathers. Of course that's
    probably a silly and irrational thought in to days world but...
    
    
    				Alfred
129.2Other factors?VCQUAL::THOMPSONNoter at largeThu Jul 09 1987 18:0712
    After re-reading my last reply, thinking about my father, and
    the little I know about Steve a second though came to me. After
    my father got re-married (he now has 4 children and 2 step-children
    and is over 60 years old) he talked about having children with
    his new wife. Now her age and other things make that unlikely
    but it was interesting that with 6 grown children he started to
    feel like he should have more. It was a matter of a new family
    a joint production with his new wife. Your thinking/talking about
    getting married again, right Steve? Wonder if that and the feelings
    about more children are related more then age. Just a thought.
    
    			Alfred
129.3QUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineThu Jul 09 1987 18:2016
    Well, I was thinking about having more children even before
    my earlier marriage ran into trouble.  Yes, I am thinking/talking
    about getting married again, and the woman to whom I am engaged
    does also want children, so that's nice, but it's no longer clear
    that we actually will get married, or if we do, when that will
    be.  The later we do so, the older we'll be and the riskier it
    will be.  If this particular relationship ends up not working
    out, I'll certainly want to consider the ability/desire to have
    children in any prospective partner.  It's important to me.
    
    However, I admit to the feeling Alfred suggests that I would
    want to have a child by my new wife - not as a means of "cementing"
    the relationship, but because it's something wonderful a couple
    can share and because I truly love children and would like another
    of my own.
				Steve
129.4Caution advised...CSSE::MARGEan ergonomical delight!Thu Jul 09 1987 21:4914
    I've known women who have rushed into an ill-advised marriage to
    have the child "they've always wanted".  And because of the courts'
    bias toward the mother in custody decisions, they've essentially
    deprived the father of equal parenting privileges.
    
    I have no doubt that men feel the ticking of the clock as women
    do... I would just caution single men that being a Sunday_father
    is not very fulfilling. 
    
    The best laid plans...
    
    Marge
    
    
129.5I must have been drinking too much caffeine!HULK::DJPLDo you believe in magic?Fri Jul 10 1987 10:3912
Well, I was personally programmed to want my first child by 25.  I didn't 
want more than a 25 year gap between me and my first born [trying to 
overcome a generation gap problem I saw in the '70s]

Well, I'm 25 and my wife is now sounding like a Ronco or K-Tel product:  
Allow 6-8 weeks for delivery! :-)

With me, I am terrified of not being able to equate with my children's 
ideas and opinions.  This 'speeded up' my bio-clock.

This is now just so much fluff because I have major disagreements with 
TODAY'S teenagers, never mind 13 years from now!
129.6Not for singles onlyQUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineFri Jul 10 1987 11:4613
    Also, I should have included in my original topic Alfred's case
    of a currently-married couple in their 30's (or whatever).  There's
    no reason why "baby hunger" has to be limited to single men (or
    women)!
    
    I agree completely with Marge that wanting a child is hardly a good
    reason by itself to get married.  And of course there is the common
    belief that many women do just this - "arrange" to get pregnant
    and then marry the father; I can't comment on whether this really
    happens this way as often as folklore would have us believe.  Has
    anyone heard of a man doing this?  It would seem much more difficult
    for a man to arrange!
    					Steve
129.7age doesn't equal understanding anywayNOVA::RANDALLI'm no ladyFri Jul 10 1987 11:5112
    for DJPL:
    
    As a mother of a thirteen-year-old I feel qualified to offer advice ... 
    
    Not to worry.  Thirteen years from now teenagers will be entirely
    different, so you'll have to go through it all over again anyway.  :)
    Just save that worry for later. 
    
    Not to mention that he or she will be just as obnoxious and wonderful
    and endearing as you and I were at that age.
    
    --bonnie    
129.8not sure what conclusions to draw from thisNOVA::RANDALLI'm no ladyFri Jul 10 1987 11:5724
    re: .6 (which snuck in while I was answering .5) --  
    
    Yes, I know a man who did this back when I was in college.  
    
    His girlfriend was a rather traditional woman in her private life but
    determined to be a lawyer; the only way she saw to resolve these
    different feelings was to remain unmarried.  However, he managed to
    persuade her into bed (people who know them presume alcoholic drink was
    involved, but that's another story) and when the consequences became
    apparent, she saw no choice but to marry this kind, loving,
    compassionate man (hey, except for this one thing, he was a nice
    guy...) to make sure their baby had a good home.  
    
    She worked evenings to put him through school (he used to read his
    molecular physics and chem engineering assignments to their
    daughter to soothe her to sleep) and then after he got a job she
    finished her schooling.  
    
    They never had another child.
    
    They eventually divorced but I don't think it had a whole lot to
    do with the circumstances of their marriage. 

    --bonnie
129.9CEODEV::FAULKNERMr MannersFri Jul 10 1987 12:201
    No.
129.10Clock? Mine must be slow, fast, or inoperable.RSTS32::DELBALSOFri Jul 10 1987 12:319
    I just passed my 39th birthday. My girls were born when I was 23
    and 25. I love them dearly and I've enjoyed every moment (well -
    *almost* every moment) of their upbringing, but I know for a fact
    that under no circumstances would I want to go through any of it
    again. I'd rather just move on enjoying what's yet to come. No -
    I did my share of baby-holding, etc.
    
    -Jack
    
129.11I'm confused...LILAC::MKPROJREAGAN::ZOREFri Jul 10 1987 13:2517
    	I'm getting confused, I thought that the term "biological clock"
    refered to the amount of time that a woman's body was capable of
    producing eggs to be fertilized.  I didn't think it had anything
    to do with fears or wants or desires.  I do understand that there
    is alot of concern by women who have forgone starting a family to
    get thier careers underway.  That concern being that the older they
    get the more difficult it is to conceive.  In some cases then, I
    would think that some women would express joy at not being able
    to conceive rather than disappointment as they didn't want any children
    anyway.  Having a biological clock is a common characteristic among
    all women (who are capable of conceiving at some time).  Having
    a fear of this clock running out is not a common characteristic
    of the aforementioned group (though alot of women do want children
    at some point in thier lives).
    
    Rich
    
129.12QUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineFri Jul 10 1987 14:108
    Re: .11
    
    Yes, in one sense the "biological clock" is a physiological property
    of women.  But its existence also fosters certain emotions in women,
    and also in men, the latter being the point of my note.  One hardly
    ever talks about the physiological side without also discussing
    the emotional side.
    					Steve
129.13Turn My Hourglass Over?TOPDOC::STANTONI got a gal in KalamazooSat Jul 11 1987 05:557
                                     
    
    My clock went off at 26 after years of kicking around the
    country being a free-wheelin' kinda guy 8^} . I met my wife
    by pure accident, we married, & had our first almost a year
    later, waited 6 years & had our second. Curiously, that desire 
    for having children is now gone. 
129.14Must be somethingMOSAIC::MODICAMon Jul 13 1987 10:225
    
    Must be something. All my life I hated kids; couldn't stand to be
    near em. After turning 30 something happened I don't understand.
    Now I not only like kids, my wife and I are having one. Geez, hope
    I don't end up liking Lawrence Welk music after I turn 40 :-)
129.15it must be very erraticHIT::WHALENThey're only out to get you if you're paranoidMon Jul 13 1987 20:578
    Well, if there is one, then there is still plenty of time on mine.
    
    Though I have no problem dealing with kids (people have even
    complemented me as to how well I handle them), at 29, I find that
    I have no desire to be a father.  Part of it may be that I am still
    very single, but I doubt that that is the entire reason.
    
    Rich
129.16who does what when the alarm sounds?ARCANA::CONNELLYFrodo livesMon Jul 13 1987 23:275
As an interesting "thought experiment", if you are a man whose
biological alarmclock seems to be ringing "it's time!", think
about quitting your job and staying home with a child for the
next five years to see if it still sounds as enthralling...
129.17sounds good to meCOLORS::MODICATue Jul 14 1987 15:164
    Re: .16
    
    I did.
    It does.
129.18QUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineTue Jul 14 1987 18:055
    Re: .16
    
    You are presuming that women typically stay home five years for
    a child.  This is hardly universal.
    					Steve
129.19avoiding those Awkward Ages!ARCANA::CONNELLYFrodo livesWed Jul 15 1987 01:4914
re: .18
>    You are presuming that women typically stay home five years for

No, I'm not presuming that they DO.  I'm not even sure most would
WANT TO.  But at some archaic point in my childhood I would say that
that was probably the minimum commitment expected of the primary
caretaker (those were extremely sexist days, I realize).

It was only intended as a minor sanity check.  Let's face it, we
all want all the bennies, and the less work we have to do, the
better the fantasy sounds.  My fantasy is just that I get to cover
for 10 months - 22 months and 34 months - 46 months...that'll give
Mom most of the Terrible Twos and Finicky Fours, I can handle the
rest (I hope!).
129.20QUARK::LIONELWe all live in a yellow subroutineWed Jul 15 1987 12:538
    Re: .19
    
    I suppose I can see that some people might feel this way, but as
    I've generally taken care of my son half of the time since he was
    eight weeks old, I didn't think it was relevant to the question.
    I'm perfectly willing to put in the effort involved - that's
    part of the fun!
    					Steve
129.21kids r greatNSG008::MILLBRANDTThink PantasyThu Jul 16 1987 13:516
    I stayed home the first four years, til my younger son was two.  Ego
    here - I figured I had more to offer my kids than a babysitter.  Now my
    husband has been home three years and counting.... 
    
    Lately they've been building a treehouse.