T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
91.1 | What_do_you_do? | CEODEV::FAULKNER | personality plus | Thu Apr 09 1987 16:36 | 5 |
| It's funny I posed almost the same question last nite to a few people.
Doesn't it make you feel wierded out when you see some woman that
you vaguely recollect as knowing and she rushes forward and hugs
the stuffin out of you???????
|
91.2 | hugs are essential | CSCMA::CHISHOLM | Clueless... | Thu Apr 09 1987 17:06 | 10 |
| I touch _everyone_, sometimes I feel threatening and stop immediately,
but the results of my own informal survey, spanning these 31 years,
disclose that _most_ people like to be touched. Is this why handshakes
were developed?
Hugs are another matter. I hug my friends, people who act like
they could use a hug. Women who drape themselves on you 'like a
cheap suit' _are_ sortof objectionable.
Jeff
|
91.3 | Trivia follows | OASS::VKILE | | Thu Apr 09 1987 17:32 | 14 |
|
For what it's worth, I read once that handshakes stem from
medieval days when men presented their palms to demonstrate
that they were not holding weapons. It evolved down through
the years to the present day handshake.
I personally still think it's a nice way to greet someone, male
or female, without being threatening or sexual.
I don't mind a touch on the arm or shoulder from co-workers or
acquaintances but I prefer hugs to be from friends and family.
Vicki
|
91.4 | Just my opinion....... | PEACHS::WOOD | Lady in red..... | Thu Apr 09 1987 18:57 | 44 |
|
The following was taken from a magazine article that I read
recently.... but I have forgotten which magazine......
"The bottom line is this: we---both men and women---miss
sensual touch. We confuse it with sexual intercourse and
so we deny it's casual use. And then, ironically, we separate
it from sexual touch, which depends on sensuality for its
goodness.
Too many people interpret every sensually loving touch as an
invitation to copulate. Bodies hunger for holding as a
sensation quite apart from genital penetration.
The need to be held is so compelling for some women that they
have intercourse when they may not really want it in exchange
for being held.
When you know yourself you'll know when your body and soul need
to be touched. What feels like sadness can simply be your
disguised need to be held; what feels like hunger or fatigue can
be your disguised wish for lovemaking."
I feel like part of the problem with people who feel
threatened when touched is what is stated in the paragraph above....
some people are just not comfortable with themselves...and those
feelings of needing human touch/contact but not necessarily sex.
I'm a very touching person. Love to hug.... and I have not
found too much rejection to it in the work place altho I'm careful
about who it is that I touch or hug as I know who appreciates my
hugs/touches and who doesn't! At home, hugs are very common with
my kids. My current SO is not a very touching person, but I'm trying
to help him feel more comfortable with that without feeling threatened.
Hugs, touching are vital to our health and well-being. I think
that a lot of times the reason for the touching/hugging is
mis-interpreted to imply that sex is wanted when it really isn't.
But it's hard to communicate that fact to some people who interpret
any touch/hug as a request for sex . . . . .
Myra
|
91.5 | ? | CEODEV::FAULKNER | personality plus | Fri Apr 10 1987 11:55 | 6 |
| re .4 Great note Myra.
But what about the men who do use hugs/touching as a meter for a
woman's potential sexual acceptance level?
How do you feel about them?
|
91.6 | I don't need *them* . . . | PEACHS::WOOD | Lady in red..... | Fri Apr 10 1987 17:49 | 14 |
|
Kerry, I'm not sure I follow your thinking?! Are you talking about
men who try to *read* whether or not I want to have sex with them
by my actions rather than my words.? If so, I don't appreciate
that. You know what they say about people who *assume*.... What
has happened to communication>?? If I'm dating a mature man who
is interested in having sex with me, then why can't we discuss it
openly rather than have him act like a teen-ager and try to gauge
my willingness by my actions?? Don't assume I want sex because
I hug you. And I won't assume that the man wants sex just because
of his actions. Let's get some communication going and have a
mature relationship.
Myra
|
91.7 | I only have sex with my wife. Sorry. | GENRAL::FRASHER | Disguised Colorado mountain man | Sat Apr 11 1987 02:22 | 6 |
| I enjoy being touched/hugged by most women.
I don't enjoy being touched/hugged by most men.
It must be bedtime, my notes are getting shorter and shorter.
Spence
|
91.9 | ! | GOOGLY::KERRELL | It's OK to know you're OK | Mon Apr 13 1987 06:22 | 24 |
| re .6:
Discus having sex? Whatever happened to romance and passion? I would even
venture to suggest that to some it would be a turnoff!
Words can also be just as misleading as body language unless it goes like
this:-
Man: I'd really like to make love to you.
Woman: Make love! You mean 'have sex'!
Man: No, I meant what I said.
Woman: You just want my body, you don't respect me as a person.
Man: Of course I respect you but I also want your body.
Woman: Do you really?
Man: Yea, sure!
....
...much more persuasive argument...
....
Woman: OK then.
Man: Thats funny I seem to have gone right off the idea.
I am not suprised!
Dave.
|
91.11 | Speechless | GOOGLY::KERRELL | It's OK to know you're OK | Mon Apr 13 1987 09:00 | 9 |
| re .10:
> There *are* actually pleasant ways to talk about making love that
> are not a turnoff to either person. Some rather interesting
> examples come to mind, in fact, but I won't post them here.
Help! I NEED examples. I am obviously not doing this right.
Dave.
|
91.14 | gauging their wants/needs ..... | CEODEV::FAULKNER | personality plus | Mon Apr 13 1987 10:15 | 6 |
| I agree with Mr. Eagle for once.....
can the corn and talk the talk monsieur googly and Ms nexus.....
And Myra there are those inconsiderate selfless jerks in the world
(yes I'm talking about MEN) that are "all over..." women on the
first occassion of meeting them
|
91.15 | Still speechless and with sense of humour | GOOGLY::KERRELL | It's OK to know you're OK | Mon Apr 13 1987 11:29 | 12 |
| re .14:
> can the corn and talk the talk monsieur googly and Ms nexus.....
The pot calling the kettle black?
I had a serious point to make - that is; 'touching' is essential if you
want to start 'love-making' and that talking about it can be a turn off.
Next.
Dave.
|
91.16 | Hon, what does it mean when I do this? | GENRAL::FRASHER | Disguised Colorado mountain man | Mon Apr 13 1987 12:59 | 37 |
| re .9
>Discus having sex? Whatever happened to romance and passion? I would even
>venture to suggest that to some it would be a turnoff!
I always thought that Discus were like other fish, "wham, bam, thank
you ma'am". ;-)
And, this, from the same reply:
>Words can also be just as misleading as body language...
8-O :-) ;-) 8-)
Just having fun, now to be serious.
I think that discussing sex is embarrassing and, therefore, makes
people uncomfortable. It took me a long to time to be able to talk
about it without being embarrassed. The more intimate the
conversation, the more embarrassing it is. I can talk about it
with male friends and anonymously with some women (MAIL, NOTES, etc.)
but, face to face with a woman is hard to do. I have been married
for 14 years and its still a little embarrassing at times. I've
evolved from not wanting to talk about it at all to being able to
talk about it in most situations. Remember the old saying "The
first time is always the hardest".
I am fortunate to have been with one woman long enough to be able
to read her actions. Depending on how she acts, I can tell if she
is willing, then just a quick word or two to confirm it. Not a
lot of discussion involved. For years, my wife was reading me wrong.
We finally discussed it and fixed it. Unfortunately, this isn't much help
to people who are dating people they don't know well. Of course,
in my opinion, you wouldn't be having sex with someone you don't
know well, but I've been out of the dating scene too long to remember.
I'm showing my age again.
Anyway, I believe in a lot of body language mixed with a little
dialogue for confirmation.
Spence
|
91.17 | Body language vs. words...... | PEACHS::WOOD | What would you think..... | Mon Apr 13 1987 13:20 | 18 |
| re.: .14
YEP! Kerry, I've been with some of those selfless jerks....
But prefer people who can talk about sex rather than pawing me in
an effort to "express" their desire to have sex with me.
re.: .16
I guess I can't understand not being able to talk about sex.
Especially with someone that I had been married to for 14 years.
I'm not "knocking" you or the way you are.... just expressing my
preference of guys who can TELL me what they want rather than
trying to "show" me and hope that I read their actions correctly.
It's so hard to interpret peoples body language. Give me English
any time.
My
|
91.18 | I think I left the subject somewhere again. | GENRAL::FRASHER | Disguised Colorado mountain man | Mon Apr 13 1987 15:32 | 39 |
| re .17
> I guess I can't understand not being able to talk about sex.
> Especially with someone that I had been married to for 14 years.
> I'm not "knocking" you or the way you are....
I'm not offended at all, in fact, I don't understand it either and
I live here (inside myself). After all these years, we talk about
everything, but sex can sometimes become awkward and embarrassing
to talk about. There is just something about sex that is embarrassing
for me to talk about. When we 'get it on', anything goes. I ask
her what she likes and vice versa. We have developed ways to talk
around it and the point is known, but to come right out and ask
for it seems like begging. YEAH...that's it, I feel like I'm begging
and that makes me uncomfortable. For many years, I was always in
the mood and she seemed never to be. I almost *had* to beg for
it. I finally found something that she likes and now she's in the
mood almost as much as I am, once or twice a week. Without details,
it concerns baby oil and rubbing her back and...use your imagination.
Anyway, we communicate without a lot of dialogue. After several
years of begging, I almost gave up and seriously thought about looking
elsewhere. I told her how I felt and *then* we talked it out, with
periods of smoke, and we got to the root of the problem. Maybe
we should have talked about it earlier, but it was too embarrassing.
It would have saved me a lot of grief and, if we hadn't finally
talked about it, it could very likely have ruined a perfect marriage.
Whenever other couples are having rough times, I always tell them
to talk it out, get it in the open, then cope with it. Then I realize
that I have trouble talking about sex. Luckily, this is the only
thing I can think of that I don't like to talk about with her.
I like to hug her and she used to pull away from me. After 15 years,
(OK, I'm a slow learner) she told me that she didn't like for me
to hug her because she thought that it made me 'frisky' and that
I wanted to have sex. We discussed it and now I can hug her. I *do*
get 'frisky' but it doesn't require having sex. I told her that
I *always* feel 'frisky' so a hug won't matter much. That's like
throwing a match onto a burning building.
Spence
|
91.19 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Mon Apr 13 1987 18:22 | 8 |
| Gee, Spence, talking about "it" is easy! Just turn off
ALL the lights, and make sure you're not facing your
partner...
(actually talking about it afterwards is kinda nice....
sort of like a curtain call complete with flowers!)
|
91.20 | Different strokes, new meaning ;=) | GENRAL::FRASHER | Disguised Colorado mountain man | Mon Apr 13 1987 22:59 | 22 |
| OOO ICK, TALK ABOUT IT AFTERWARDS!!! NEVER!!!
I was taught (I don't remember who did the teaching) that you should
talk afterwards, but not about *IT*. To do 'it' and then roll over
and go to sleep is messy and it gives the impression that you were
dissatisfied. We talk about other things, but not 'it'. We sometimes
comment about how much better it gets with practice, but that's
it. This comes from embarrassment again. If I can't talk about
it before, I sure can't talk about it after.
she - How was that?
me - Great! You're like wine, you get better with age! (snicker)
she - Yeah, practice makes perfect, huh? (snicker)
me - You'd think we'd have it down pat after 14 years. (snicker)
she - Who's Pat?
me - Ha, ha, ha! Cute!
she - Hey, there's always room for improvement. (snicker)
Think that'll hold you for a week?
me - I guess, if I have to. (snicker) Well, are we going skiing
tomorrow or what? I saw something in a notesfile today...
Spence
|
91.23 | Must be me | GOOGLY::KERRELL | It's OK to know you're OK | Tue Apr 14 1987 08:11 | 9 |
| re .22:
> Honestly, it doesn't have to be a turn-off to talk before, or
> ICKY to talk afterward (to quote Spence. :-)
I agree. I like being talked too even if I do get embarrassed occasionally
it is still a turn-on. The problem is that this situation isn't mutual.
Dave.
|
91.24 | To Quote a Quote | ERASER::BUCKLEY | Little girl wants to be an Actress | Tue Apr 14 1987 15:38 | 4 |
|
"Baby, talk dirty to me"
/Bj
|
91.25 | | NCVAX1::COOPER | | Tue Apr 14 1987 15:55 | 5 |
| re .24
I hear ya!!
|
91.26 | | MUNICH::CLINCH | Life begins at... (muffled thump) | Tue Apr 14 1987 19:02 | 13 |
| re .24,.25 Add my vote.
But just as there is are the two extremes of a radio melodrama, a Shusaki
play and then the combination in an audiovisual play, there is also,
concerning our topic, what I'd call sensuo-visual communication
(sensuo- : touch)
I would think it rare not to be able to communicate something
by talking that could not as well and better be sensuo-visually
communicated. Or maybe my analogy of a Shusaki actor is just
too hopelessly romantic?
Simon.
|
91.27 | Not-lovers and Not-strangers | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Tue Apr 14 1987 21:39 | 24 |
| Well, not all of us are married or in the throes of a romantic
encounter :-(, so back to .0 for a minute:
I miss touching. When I worked in France, we all shook hands twice
a day, once when we said hello, and once when we said goodnight.
You'd shake your boss's hand, your tech's hand, the hand of anybody
you knew. The more you liked someone, the more touching was involved
(a hand on the shoulder while the other was shaking hands).
Here in the US, a handshake is a very formal thing you do with people
you hardly know. And it's not cool to touch another person's shoulder
at work unless you know them _very_ well (particularly if you are
a young woman working with a lot of men). Since I've been in my
lab for a while and people know me, I don't think it'd go over very
well if I went back to shaking the hand of the people I like and
work with.
I guess my point is that we don't seem to have any way to touch
each other that isn't excessively formal in this culture (hand-shaking)
or excessively familiar for every-day situations (hugging). Perhaps
that has a lot to do with the discomfort many of us feel in touching
people who are not family, veryvery close friends, or lovers.
Lee
|
91.28 | no, we don't touch | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Apr 15 1987 09:58 | 11 |
| Lee, you're perfectly right. And even families often don't touch
each other! You'd be astonished at the number of otherwise healthy,
normal men and women who love their kids deeply but never hug them
except when they have to wipe their faces or bandage their elbows.
You never really outgrow the shell this puts around you, either.
I still feel embarrassed when my brother, two years younger than
me, sweeps me into a bear hug when I go home to visit.
--bonnie
|
91.30 | We do! And it's nice. | OPHION::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Wed Apr 15 1987 13:17 | 9 |
| Well the group I'm in is fairly "huggy". There are a lot of people
in my group that I greet with a hug. On the other hand, none of
the people I hug regularly is a man... oh well.
We are in California, maybe that has *something* to do with it.
We also do a lot of things together socially. Our group is pretty
close.
-- Charles
|
91.31 | Happy Hugging!! | VAXWRK::CONNOR | John Connor | Thu Apr 16 1987 12:33 | 2 |
| Would I ever like to hug my therapist!! Squeeze my emotions
into a love cocktail. Isn't there a lady Leo B. around?
|
91.32 | I'd rather be... | CSCMA::CHISHOLM | Clueless... | Fri Apr 17 1987 10:09 | 12 |
| re: .28
Start a new family tradition.
Your brother has the right idea.
Then branch out to your friends and your group.
I can't imagine life without it at this point.
Hugs _are_ essential.
Jeff
|
91.33 | I'm working on it | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Apr 17 1987 11:29 | 15 |
| I started with my own kids, since they're the ones who need it the
most.
I can now hug one or two close friends without thinking they're
going to interpret my touch as sexual interest.
And it does help. My family is much stronger and my friendships
are richer.
But none of this comes easily, and it's virtually impossible to reach
out to my parents. Hugs may be essential, but after 30-some years of
distance, they don't change everything overnight.
--bonnie, who would like to be more open but isn't.
|
91.34 | what i saw... | USMRW1::REDICK | | Wed Apr 29 1987 21:35 | 21 |
|
I got a chance to view this issue at an Anniversary Party for Lotus
Development Corporation. I thought what I observed might be
interesting to some.
First of all, the mood was definately happy...as you might already
suspect. What I observed was women rushing towards each other and
hugging, pecking on the cheek, and laughing loudly and obviously.
Women with men were a little more reserved or should i say -alot-
more reserved. They were standing around, hands in pockets talking
etc. They were laughing too, don't get me wrong, but it was a very
different laugh. Men that were grouped together were very on guard...
joking etc. without getting down to serious issues. I did notice
one reach back, when walking forward, to pat another guy on the
shoulder but before he could do so a look of realization passed
over his face and he recoiled. I also noticed that women that were
being joyous together were looking towards the men to see if they
were watching.
Just an observation....
|
91.35 | It's in the book, Chapter 3 | LEZAH::RANDERSON | | Thu Apr 30 1987 12:54 | 5 |
| It's an old time macho rule, men don't hug men, least you be labeled
unmanly, it's one of those things in the men don't cry in public
category. It's one of those things past down like the 10 commandments.
It's in the male rule book - it's ok if you're celebrating a Sports
victory, or on the playing field or something.
|
91.36 | A Man's Man. A Manly Man. A Man amoung Men. etc... | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Thu Apr 30 1987 18:10 | 10 |
|
Gee, and I thought it was in "The Manly Handbook" :-)
The same book that has a picture of John Wayne whipping Margeret
O'Hara around (from the movie "A Big Man" I think) with the
caption "Dancing, as taught by The Master"
mike
|
91.37 | Argghhh! | FIVE9::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Thu Apr 30 1987 18:37 | 20 |
| Re: "men not hugging men"
This is one injustice that really hits home with me. I love to hug, and
cuddle, and be physically close, but with men it has to be in private,
hidden away. It's also much rarer, and I still feel uncomfortable with
public displays of male-male affection (my display, not others)
I'm being cheated, and I don't like it. I don't know what to do about
it either. I hug women in public, and I cuddle children regardless of
sex, but I can't be physically affectionate with men in public. That
sucks. (ahem) I was raised that it's not ok, and I still have uneasy
feelings sometimes about being physically affectionate with other men.
It's just not fair. How can I fix this? I can't change all of society,
and almost all of the men I know would just die (or kill me) if I
hugged them in public. So, what can I do?
Especially, how do I avoid passing this sick attitude on to my
children?
-- Charles
|
91.38 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Fri May 01 1987 00:44 | 7 |
| � Especially, how do I avoid passing this sick attitude on to my
� children?
Hug them. Alot.
mike
|
91.39 | Touch me again, and I'm makin' you bacon. | BLITZN::AIKALA | I am not unwell, thank you. | Sat May 02 1987 10:36 | 5 |
|
The only, and I do mean "only" aversion I have to being touched,
is when someone is touching me in an agressive manner to drive
home an agressive point, or is trying to be intimidating. This
type of touching is very unwise and sometimes not too healthy.
|
91.40 | just watch *where* you touch! | SAHQ::CARLSON | Colour the Wind | Tue Mar 29 1988 14:58 | 17 |
| Wow! Good topic!
I came out of a really yucky teenage stage (years ago ;v)) and didn't
want to *touch* anyone... ewwwwwww grose! I really ended up hurting
myself, because it took a long time for me to break out of that
no-touching mode. I wasn't even comfortable hugging a close friend
in despair. Now, I'm a lot better with family and friends especially.
When you're crying and just want to hide away, nothing feels more
warm or comforting than a hug. Of course that's not the only time
a hug comes in handy!
My SO is a very touchy person, that's how he expresses himself.
And that has made as least one of my girlfriends uncomfortable.
That's a real shame, the division of touching between the sexes
becomes pretty narrow for some folks.
theresa.
|
91.41 | I do it for ME | SKYLRK::OLSON | green chile crusader! | Wed Jul 06 1988 19:14 | 21 |
| Guess I'm glad I've been slower reading back topics in MENNOTES
than in some other conferences...if I'd read all this about discomfort
when hugging other men I might have neglected Harris when I sent
him back home at the airport a couple days ago. I hugged Janet
goodbye, I hugged Harris goodbye, I snarled at the car honking behind
me, unloaded their bags from the trunk and beat it.
Should I have taken the anonymous mole behind me as "society showing
its disapproval of PDA" ?? Nah, I thought she was honking because
I took too long in the unloading zone.
I grew up with parents who didn't show much affection. Children
of midwestern farm states, both of them. So I'm not much of a touch-
feel reinforcement guy. At the same time, I won't deny myself or
my very close friends that bonding, especially at greeting or
farewell. I'm trying to hug more, but hey- thats for me, not to
fight off some imaginary societal bugaboo. Makes me feel good.
Now, if there were only an SO to practice with! ;-)
DougO
|
91.42 | we need more hugs-yes I mean you too guys | CHET::PAQUETTE_E | | Wed Sep 19 1990 16:44 | 13 |
| I feel the same way Charles does. I really feel that there is
something missing in not being able to hug/touch other men. I believe
that touching is essential for a person's well being. I feel deprived
of good feelings by not being able to hug the guys, or gals for that
matter, for fear of that action being misread. My wife is not a touchy
person at all, I belive it comes from her relationship with her dad
which is not close or touchy in the least. Hugging guys is in the
same category as guys dancing with other guys ( a no-no), but it's
perfectly OK of women to dance with the same sex. This stuff really
drives me nuts trying to understand it all. I could go on forever
so I'll stop for now.
/ed
|
91.43 | Its more difficult | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:58 | 20 |
| I have become basically a no touch person except for my wife and son
and occasionally hugs for relatives. I am somewhat hung up. Touching
friends is so easily misread that I have learned to back away from it.
Society is so 'paranoid'? about touching/sexuality that I consider it
extremely risky to touch people. Its especially risky to hug or touch
children (except ones' own) in benign ways because of the possibility
of misinterpretation. I stay completely away from touching children
except my son who (at 3 years old) gets hugs and kisses.
I felt that I (and others) are losing alot because of our attitudes
and uncertainty toward touching and sexuality. Its an absolute mine
field figuring out who would or wouldn't be offended in various
situations. So I have stopped trying to figure it out and basically
abstain. I am 47 years old and have watched the social touching and
sexuality issues steadily worsen over my life time. Some things which
would have been ok in the 1950's would be extremely risky now. Perhaps
my perception has changed but I don't thats all thats changed.
Jeff
|
91.44 | Open and caring are important to my life! | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Whittlers chip away at life | Wed Oct 03 1990 19:01 | 36 |
|
I have, after many years, learned to touch and hug people as "appropriate"
or when it seems right. I spent 5 years working with a Church youth group
and in that time I made many close friends with both young men and women in
the group, some of who I still correspond with today, 15 years later! They
were the most open, accepting, caring, and loving group of kids I had ever
known. (with a few exceptions, but there will always be exceptions.) From
them I learned to trust people better, love them more openly, and hug them
when they or I needed it.
I obviously, as a manager, can't do that with my employees, it is neither
appropriate or called for. However, former employees and peers may be
receptive to a friendly hug if I haven't seen them for long periods. It all
depends on how we got along when working together, and what our
relationship is now. I carry this out to my personal life and find there are
many female friends whom I can hug as well. I find it a real high to know
that I trust people and they trust me enough to share a hug or touch
without reading any more into it other than "Glad to see you, I have missed
you". There are also men I can hug without stigma or rejection, for many of
the same reasons.
It is a feeling and attitude and openness that is hard to develop and takes
a long time to break thru your mind set. I can't tell you how to develop
it, it will happen if you are around others who are open and can share
those feeling with you. I have had one two week class here at DEC with my
fellow managers that experianced that same openness and caring. It made a
world of difference and as a class, we still keep in touch and care deeply
about each other.
I may not be able to tell you how to find it or develop it, but once,
found, it is a great way to live!
Regards,
Vic
|
91.45 | Good | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Mon Oct 08 1990 09:57 | 3 |
| I admire your ability to get in touch with your and others feelings
Vic. It sounds as if you have managed to determine how to determine
what appropriate touching is. Jeff
|