T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
68.1 | I prefer Womans jeans! | ROYCE::RKE | dragons slain....maids rescued | Wed Feb 04 1987 13:56 | 4 |
| If you'd have done that round here, you may not have survived
to make a note of it!.......Mens Trousers indeed!
Richard.
|
68.2 | Define your market and go for it | ERASER::BUCKLEY | | Wed Feb 04 1987 14:15 | 4 |
| Spence,
Ever consider becoming a fashion designer?? (^; (just kidding!)
Bj
|
68.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Feb 04 1987 14:56 | 12 |
| What the heck is so important about what fabric your pants are made
of? I seriously doubt you can find a significant correlation to
place of origin and pants style. Here at ZK you can find the entire
range, from cut-off shorts to a full suit. I wear what I consider
to be both comfortable (physical and emotionally) and suitable
to the workplace. Other people have other ideas on what's best
for them. I'm glad that there is no attempt to enforce a dress code
here.
What are you trying to prove, anyway? That wearing blue jeans is
somehow a sign of virility?
Steve
|
68.4 | I smell flames | TRCO01::HOBBS | Get It On Video! | Wed Feb 04 1987 15:38 | 3 |
| Steve,
Right On!
|
68.5 | I've been blue, but no more!! | ARGUS::COOK | Mental Graffiti | Thu Feb 05 1987 02:40 | 8 |
|
I'm starting in software support up in TWO and I plan to wear
no-blue jeans. I have been an operator for a long time and have
been wearing jeans for a while. Now that I have a Real job I am
glad to dress nice, I'll even wear a tie if I have to (but not
tight) {gag...hack}
Peter
|
68.6 | | RDGE28::SADAT | Jambo!! | Thu Feb 05 1987 04:06 | 1 |
| Have you tried telling your fellow operators that they don't have 'Real jobs'?
|
68.7 | what you don't know, won't hurt you. | ARGUS::COOK | Mental Graffiti | Thu Feb 05 1987 04:41 | 7 |
|
Well, they consider it one but I don't. The little knowledge
I have of Computer Science makes operations quite monotonous.
I would rather think and learn for a living...
prc
|
68.8 | P.S... | ARGUS::COOK | Mental Graffiti | Thu Feb 05 1987 04:43 | 5 |
|
I am by no means putting down Operations, it is just that I like
to do software not operations.
8^)
|
68.9 | | RDGE43::KEW | Can you imanige?? | Thu Feb 05 1987 07:06 | 5 |
| > I am by no means putting down Operations, it is just that I like
> to do software not operations.
Yes you were, it's just you wont admit it.
|
68.10 | You got the 401 blues? | SUCCES::BURTON | | Thu Feb 05 1987 13:07 | 36 |
|
What the hell are you getting at Spence? In D.E.C. we all dress
up or down depending on personal preference and/or to meet the
requirements of our jobs. I work in Educational services in Marlboro
(Mass.) and dress as I'm expected to by management. We are all
representatives of this company and should drop personal preferences
for the benefit of same.(concerning attire of course)
When I was a tech in a manufacturing enviroment I wore jeans and
flannel shirts in winter or jeans and t-shirts in summer. Anything
dressier would have turned to sh*t in a day. What with cabling over
and under systems, exposure to cleaners, head cleaning solutions
etc...I do still wear jeans but rarely. Usually when I know I'll
be spending the day out of site of customers or the like.
Unfortunatly first impressions do count. 99% of the time I wear
corduroys or cottons and 1% of the time I wear a suit. This is
determined by the days schedule. I couldn't show up at a CSSE meeting
dressed like I'd just cleaned the barn.
I think you'd be surprised at how most of us Digits dress out of
the workplace. Even Ken Olson wears jeans when fishing. I've seen
him in more casual garb one weekend at holiday time touring the
Westminster facility. But I doubt he'd ever show up at a stockholders
meeting dressed that way. Neither would you!
What the hell's the big deal over this anyway. One of the managers
in this group wears jeans when fishing. When he's here he's got
one of those "things" around his neck and dress pants and shirt.
That's one of the requirements of his job! (Not fishing, though
I'm sure he wouldn't object)
Is it that important to you? How about skin color? Hair length?
My lunch is over. I'll get back to you on this and maybe a few more
later.
Rob
|
68.11 | Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuuse, ME!!! | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Thu Feb 05 1987 19:33 | 33 |
| I didn't mean to step on any toes, I was simply pointing out the
difference. Its not a big deal to me, obviously it does get under
YOUR skin for someone to bring it up. If its a big deal to YOU,
then OK, I won't be curious about it anymore, God knows I wouldn't
want to piss anybody off just because I noticed that you don't wear
blue jeans. At first, I didn't understand what .1 meant:
> If you'd have done that round here, you may not have survived
> to make a note of it!.......Mens Trousers indeed!
but, thanks to all of you, I now realize that you are all very
sensitive about anyone asking about what you wear and why. So,
I'll reverse the question "What's the big deal?" I take a simple
observation and you all think that I'm trying to justify my virility
because I wear blue jeans? If I were a millionaire, I would still
wear blue jeans BECAUSE THEY ARE COMFORTABLE. PERIOD. Not because
of some perverted notion that they make me virile. The whole idea
of blue jeans has been a stigma for years. Even today, many bars
and restaurants won't allow blue jeans, not dress pants, knits,
or corduroys, but blue jeans. This separates blue jeans from all
other types of "Mens Trousers". It was just a simple observation
and I was curious why its so. Of the few people who I asked 'why',
no one was put off about it. If you think that I put you down, then
you have more problems than I care to address, but I WOULD like
to know what in the hell made you think I was putting anyone down.
If it weren't for the letters that I received from people who actually
care about what I think, this would be my last entry into this
notesfile.
How many of you responded to the note about your underwear? I don't
recall this much smoke in THAT topic.
Have a nice day!!! >-|
Spence
|
68.12 | | RDGE43::KEW | Can you imanige?? | Fri Feb 06 1987 07:06 | 9 |
| Hey Spence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't leave just because some guy got out of bed the wrong side, at least
that's the best explanation I can see! ;-)
Jerry
|
68.13 | Wrong side of the bed! | SUCCES::BURTON | | Fri Feb 06 1987 10:24 | 26 |
|
I re-read my response!
I re-read your initial entry!
RE:12
I'm getting a round bed to avoid fallingoff the wrong end.
Spence, don't split on my account! I should have proofed my reply
before entering it and been a little more aware of what you were
getting at.
I plead insanity! That time of the month, etc.....
I'm not sensitive about attire. If you saw the way I dress you'd
agree. Just plain sensitive, or grouchy sometimes.
I'm not going to remove my reply, partly cause I need a reminder
to calm myself down befor opening my trap. And because if you hose
down the hot-headed portions, you'll see I did respond to your initial
inquiry.
I would have called you personally to ..gulp... apologize, but it's
hard to talk with BOTH feet in my mouth.
Rob Burton
|
68.16 | $0.02 worth | HERMES::CLOUD | Once around the universe, James! | Fri Feb 06 1987 23:33 | 12 |
| Comfort vs. Fashion:
I always lose this battle...I would much rather prefer to be
comfortable than to satisfy some bullsh*t fashion trends. Now,
on the other hand, if the job, area, co-workers, politics, or
whatever required me to wear a nicer set of apparel, then sure,
I'd do it. I'm not saying that I dress shabbily, but I much
prefer comfortable jeans/cords over poly plastic clothes. Give
me real cotton!
Phil
|
68.17 | yep, auhuh! | YODA::COOK | Mental Graffiti | Mon Feb 09 1987 14:45 | 8 |
| re .14
That's why us Supernauts do Support!
p.s. Even though it is not required, Supernauts "dress to kill"!
Peter Cook
|
68.18 | Thermostat setting = comfortable | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Tue Feb 10 1987 12:46 | 40 |
| OK. I went back and reread everything.
.1 sort of threw me, I didn't really understand the message.
.3 came on and really twisted my jaw. From that point on, I guess
I developed tunnel vision and everything after that point seemed
like a dig. In actuality, only .3, .4, and .10 were digs, but I
assumed that everything in between was a dig, although they weren't
even close. I apologize for refering to 'you all' as being so
sensitive. I now realize that it was a minority of replies that
flamed. Maybe I'm the one who's too sensitive. It caught me by
such total surprise that I reacted in anger. Sorry. I guess I'll
stick around, there are too many interesting conferences going on
to quit now. And I'm really learning a lot.
And now, on with the show.
I like blue jeans because they are comfy and durable. I tried a
lot of different brands, Levi's, Wranglers, and such. I found that
they tend to shrink continuously and finally wind up too short.
I found JC Penney's 'no-names' to be my best choice. The size when
I buy them is the size that they stay. They always fit right.
I currently own about 12 pairs of them. My wife prefers Levi's
501 shrink-to-fit's. They have button flies. I hate button flies
with a passion.
I once overheard a man addressing a new hire saying that the dress
code for here is blue jeans and flannel shirts. Interesting, though,
was the fact that he wore a suit and tie.
I don't like to dress up because I feel like I have to be extra
careful not to get dirty. If I can't get dirty, I can't have fun.
Some of my job requires getting dirty. If I get off of work and
have a flat tire, I'm already dressed for the occasion. I can go
straight from work to fishing, too. I don't have to worry about
what to wear the next day, all of my jeans look the same.
In Germany, it is considered chic to wear jeans. Mostly because they
cost a fortune. But, they must be new, dark blue, not faded. Just
a little trivia.
Spence
|
68.19 | Jeans=comfortable | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Fri Feb 13 1987 11:40 | 13 |
| RE .5, & .7, Peter, I don't think the type of pants you wear have
much to do with "thinking and learning" which is why you say you
are changing jobs. Change your job, but why change your pants?
You can think and learn in jeans just as well as "dressier" pants,
in fact, maybe more so since you may be more comfortable. Remember,
what looks "nice" to you may not look the nicest to another person.
AND, anything DEC will pay you for is a job.
What kind of pants do you consider most suitable for drumming? :-)
Lorna
|
68.20 | | DEBET::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Fri Feb 13 1987 12:29 | 12 |
|
I wear jeans.. I have 3-5 pairs of jeans! (3 pairs of 501's)
When I'm not wearing jeans I'm wearing another type of cotton
pants.. My style is laid back and relaxed. I like to be comfy
when I work. I DO dress up on occasion but only to break the
monotony.
Jeans, cotton pants, flannel shirts, sweatshirts in the winter.
Jeans, t-shirts, lightweight sports coats in the summer.
mike
|
68.21 | Are your trousers too small? | ROYCE::RKE | dragons slain....maids rescued | Sat Feb 14 1987 02:48 | 6 |
| I wear some kind of jeans most of the time, but that is a function
of my style/job, however I feel comfortable in my other trousers,
if you are not then there is something wrong with your taylor.
Richard
|
68.22 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Mon Feb 16 1987 13:17 | 9 |
| Re .21, I think the comment that if his other pants are not as
comfortable as jeans, then there is something "wrong with his taylor",
is nonsense. I find jeans to be far more comfortable than dress
slacks, dresses, or skirts, but that doesn't mean that the other
clothes don't fit me right. They just aren't as comfortable as
jeans even though they fit!
Lorna
|
68.23 | | ROYCE::RKE | dragons slain....maids rescued | Mon Feb 16 1987 14:02 | 5 |
| Is your discomfort physical, or psychological? The former can be
sorted out by a taylor, the latter.....well I really don't know.
Richard.
|
68.24 | Casual and Comfortable | RSTS32::DELBALSO | | Mon Feb 16 1987 15:43 | 16 |
| I wear jeans and oxford shirts almost exclusively (at work or away)
and I'm a SW Eng. Supv. Weekends, I can be talked into trading the
oxford for a flannel, and I do keep a Pendleton in the office to
wear in the lab. Before I worked for DEC (going on 10 years now)
I was a consultant and previously a systems analyst/sales support
type for the publishing industry - suit and tie all the time. I
had enough. Besides, jeans and oxfords are more comfortable to me
and I'm more productive when I'm comfortable. I have pretty much
relegated the suit/tie/dress pants scene to weddings, funerals,
trade shows, customer visits and a rare meeting or two in Maynard.
(Oh, BTW, by "customer visits" I mean me on their site. If they
come here, I'd prefer that they see me as I normally work.)
-Jack
|
68.25 | long hair and nice clothes | YODA::COOK | Iron Duck | Mon Feb 16 1987 17:02 | 13 |
|
re. Lorna
BTW, I was just kidding at Rays.
Us men with long hair find it most useful to dress nice. If
one had long hair and dressed in jeans, wouldn't some people
instinctively form a bad opinion? Some do some don't, but I
feel that dressing nice negates that a little.
PRC
|
68.26 | why jeans are comfie for me | CELICA::QUIRIY | Christine | Mon Feb 16 1987 17:59 | 17 |
|
About being more comfortable in jeans...
I think alot of it has to do with the fact that jeans can be tossed in the
wash very often, whereas "nice" slacks may have to be dry-cleaned or given
some kind of special treatment. In any case, I don't worry about ripping my
jeans, or spilling some part of my lunch on them or getting them dirty.
Jeans continue to look good even after they've faded from frequent washing,
but "nice" slacks just look old and worn and out of shape. Also, in the sort
of weather we've been having, I won't wear anything but jeans, sweaters, and
my high top sneakers. Wearing "nice" slacks means wearing "nice" (skimpy
little) shoes to go with them and that means wearing nylons or some other
kind of flimsy stocking which won't keep my feet warm. I can feel
comfortable in my good clothes, but most of them are geared for warm weather:
washable, and not exorbitantly expensive to replace (as woolens are).
CQ
|
68.27 | more thoughts | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Tue Feb 17 1987 11:31 | 29 |
| What's an "Oxford Shirt"?
I don't like corduroy because the 'fuzzy stuff' rubs off on the
front of the thighs. They also sound funny when walking.
BTW, corduroy pillows make head lines 8^)
Nice polyester dress pants are cold in the winter and hot in the
summer. I wear cowboy boots with my suit, when I wear it. I own
a couple of nice poly pants that I wear square dancing in the spring
and fall.
I have a pair of Levi's and Dickeys that I wear square dancing.
They are a lot like blue jeans but don't fade. To me, they are
dressy blue jeans (is there such a thing?)
Today I am 'dressed up'. I am wearing a pair of unfaded Wranglers
that my wife gave me. And a new flannel shirt.
Around here, long hair and dressed-to-kill looks funny. Long hair
goes better with blue jeans. Long hair and a suit will draw stares
but long hair and blue jeans won't get a second glance. To me,
long hair is past the collar (my, how times change ;-).
My wife won't wear dresses or skirts because they are uncomfortable
and in blue jeans, she doesn't have to keep her knees pressed together.
She likes tennis shoes and can't wear them with a skirt.
Spence
|
68.28 | taylor????? | COOKIE::ZANE | Shattering Reality | Tue Feb 17 1987 12:05 | 1 |
|
|
68.29 | | REGENT::KIMBROUGH | This is being hostessed | Tue Feb 17 1987 16:46 | 10 |
| >> What's an "Oxford Shirt"?
A cotten or cotten blend shirt.. woven material, button down collar and
double button cuff.. yoke at the back with a pleat down the center back..
very comfortable, wear well and fade well.
Usually made in soft pastels or white.
New England classics I might add!
|
68.30 | | DEBET::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Tue Feb 17 1987 20:21 | 6 |
| RE: Skirt and sneakers..
You really have to come to Boston. Women have been wearing sneakers
and skirts together for a while now.. (at least to and from work)
mike
|
68.31 | The polyester meltdown | TWOBOS::LAFOSSE | | Thu Mar 26 1987 09:11 | 5 |
| polyester pants......... are you kidding, you go out on a sunny
day and your talking spontaneous combustion. stick with the all
natural stuff.... COTTON
Fra
|
68.32 | Wool/poly blend is great! | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Mar 26 1987 11:42 | 8 |
| Re: .31
I've been recently phasing out my polyester slacks for washable
wool/poly blend slacks. They look a LOT nicer than the all-poly,
feel great and should last a lot longer. I don't care for cotton
because it always looks too casual.
Steve
|
68.33 | Sorry, I lost my mind. | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Fri Mar 27 1987 00:13 | 10 |
| I'd forgotten about this note. I wanted to reply to .30 after I'd
had a chance to look around and talk. The general concensus around
here (Colorado) is that women don't wear tennis shoes with skirts
except during lunch hour in the summer to walk around the building
for exercise or fresh air. All 3 of us agreed. 8-)
I'm not sure I could handle Boston. I'd have scars on my chin from
my mouth dropping open. ;-)
Spence
|
68.34 | Reasons | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | one more day and vacation | Fri Mar 27 1987 07:33 | 22 |
| Spence,
I will explain to you why the Yuppies and Urbanites where sneakers.
We need the traction for the "T". Riding the green line can be
an exercise of balance. I try to see how long I can remain standing
alone without holding on. Great exercise, strengthens upper thighs
sort of like bowling.
The second reason is the dirt. If we wear our sneakers we keep
our high heels clean and attractive.
The funny part of it is some of the sneakers cost more than the
high heels. One does not wear Thom McCann sneakers in the city,
Reebok is popular amongst others which I am not familiar.
The city is a great place and the mobility that sneakers provide
has created a new fashion. I have noticed some of the women from
the country (Maynard) are now doing the same thing. When you drive
a car your right shoe gets worn right over the heel. So wearing
sneakers prevents this.
Joyce
|
68.35 | I'm sooooo confused. | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Fri Mar 27 1987 11:42 | 5 |
| re .34
That makes sense. But, I concede, what is a "T"? Is that something
like a balance bar in gymnastics? And with a green line? What?
Spence
|
68.36 | Being helpful... | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Mar 27 1987 12:14 | 6 |
| Re: .35
.34 is talking about subway trains. "T" is the name given to the
Boston subway system, "Green Line" is one of the routes.
Steve
|
68.37 | come and see for yourself | ULTRA::GUGEL | Spring is for rock-climbing | Fri Mar 27 1987 16:14 | 5 |
| re 35:
Try to get a trip to Maynard or something and check it out ;-)
-Ellen
|
68.38 | Ah, ha! | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Fri Mar 27 1987 18:23 | 13 |
| Oh, yeah, I see now. Trying to stay on board without holding
on for as long as possible, like they do on TV. And traction to
run and catch the subway. It makes sense now, thanks.
I once even actually saw and rode a subway. It was in Paris. It
was a lot different from the ones on TV with all the graffiti and
stuff. It was very clean and the stations were really sharp looking.
I felt safe in it.
Thanks again,
Spence
P.S. We don't have 'em because they scare our horses. ;-)
|
68.40 | Metal Token Alliteration | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis (the Menace) Ahern 223-5882 | Mon Mar 30 1987 16:07 | 12 |
| RE: .39 "Get Charlie off"
MTA = METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY
|
68.41 | Trolley Museum | CANDY::POTUCEK | N.E._<>_SKIER | Tue Mar 31 1987 10:18 | 10 |
| RE: .39
Bob,
It is the Kennebunk Trolley Museum.
Right off Rt.1
JMP
|
68.42 | We don't have streetcars either. | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Tue Mar 31 1987 12:25 | 12 |
| I've been thinking about this. I've decided that I was thinking
of a streetcar, re hanging onto the outside. I don't think you
can hang onto the outside of a subway, can you? I think that she
was saying that they stand in the aisle and try to keep from getting
thrown against the back wall during acceleration, for as long as
possible.
Is this correct, or am I still confused?
Spence
P.S. Its a tangent, but this wasn't going anywhere anyway. ;-)
|
68.44 | Summer shorts | ROYCE::RKE | RKE, News at Ten, Reading | Sun Apr 05 1987 06:58 | 4 |
| What would be the feelings, of the folks, here towards men
wearing shorts to work in the summer?
Richard.
|
68.45 | legs..... | PRESTO::MITCHELL | | Sun Apr 05 1987 09:32 | 3 |
| We would sure see a lot of hairy legs ;-)
kathie
|
68.47 | I can control my eyes :-) | LSTARK::THOMPSON | Noter of the LoST ARK | Mon Apr 06 1987 16:31 | 9 |
| I'd never wear them to work. But I find shorts very uncomfortable
unless I'm involved in some sports event (basketball or swimming).
I don't see any reason to ban them though. Shorts or no more
distracting then all sorts of other attire. Depending on who's
wearing them they can be even less a distraction then 'regular'
clothes. :-)
Alfred
|
68.48 | I don't like hairy legs, not even mine. | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Mon Apr 06 1987 19:04 | 13 |
| I wouldn't wear shorts to work because I don't like to show my legs
except when wearing swimming attire. Some kinda wierd modesty trip
from my childhood. It took about 11 years for my wife to get me
to wear them when working in the yard.
If other men wore them, I'd stare and chuckle inside until the novelty
wore off. See 'wierd trip' above. I remember a time when 'real
men don't wear shorts'. That was the same time that 'real men don't
wear white socks'. Times change, so would I.
BTW, I'd freeze to death at work.
Spence
|
68.49 | Scuba gear is also a No No! | HYDRA::LYMAN | Village Idiot | Tue Apr 07 1987 20:19 | 8 |
| Re: .44
I doubt very seriously that Digital will ever allow employees
to wear shorts to work. In fact I still shudder when I think
of the uproar that was caused when security caught me puttering
around the Lab in my bikini briefs.
Jake
|
68.50 | | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter of the LoST ARK | Wed Apr 08 1987 10:28 | 4 |
| Given that I seem to remember seeing people wearing shorts in
ZKO two years ago, when did shorts become forbidden?
Alfred
|
68.51 | | FOLES::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Wed Apr 08 1987 18:40 | 13 |
| RE: .50
You ARE working too much Alfred. :-)
When I worked 2nd shift a while back I used to wear shorts all
the time. Mostly when I was coming back from the beach. :-) As
for now, I wouldn't mind wearing shorts and I may when it gets warmer
but that will be a judgement call.
Don't ever expect DEC to enforce a serious dress code. It's
not the DEC way unless you are meeting with customers.
mike
|
68.53 | we wear short shorts... | BEING::MCANULTY | sitting here comfortably numb..... | Fri Apr 10 1987 17:37 | 10 |
|
People still wear shorts, adn tongs here at ZK, only it seems
to be a little more comfortable in the summer. I myself wear
shorts. It is more comfortable, because the heat always seems
to be on in the summer....(or am I hot from working hard..8*)....
....no not me)....You just don't see women wearing shorts...I
guess I might not get to much done....
Mike
|
68.54 | Can they wear bikinis in Florida? | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Sat Apr 11 1987 01:44 | 7 |
| Gee, I don't think I've *ever* seen men or women in DEC, CXO, wearing
shorts. I wonder why. Is ZK close to a beach or something?
Hairy legs scare our horses! (OK, I'll try to control myself in
the future ;-)
Spence
|
68.55 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Apr 11 1987 10:57 | 9 |
| Re: .54
ZKO is at least an hour from any beach. I really don't care for
shorts - on myself or others - especially at work. But it's not
my place to tell others how they should dress. If they feel
comfortable in shorts and their management doesn't care, then
I won't worry about it. But you'll never see ME in shorts at
work!
Steve
|
68.56 | Legs like tree trunks - mind to match. | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Mon Apr 13 1987 10:27 | 13 |
| A few times this past summer at LTN2 we were running under brown-out
conditions and the choice was power for the computers and their air
conditioning or power for lights and office air conditioning.
It got kind of dim and hot. T-shirts, strange Hawaiian shirts,
and shorts were pretty much required survival clothes. I can
understand why some guys are not enthusiastic about showing their
legs though. Some real toothpicks with hair...
/Dave
|
68.57 | RE: .5, .7, etc | DVINCI::VERRIER | | Wed Apr 22 1987 11:47 | 2 |
| "Dressed to Kill" ?? You ???????? Who dresses you in the morning now,
your mother ???
|
68.59 | Am I that much out of touch??? | GENRAL::FRASHER | Undercover mountain man | Sat Apr 25 1987 00:30 | 5 |
| All right, you guys are messing with my mind. First the 'T', now
speedos. Let me quess, they're tennis shoes, right? If that's
all you wear, I can see why people notice. ;-)
Spence
|
68.60 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Apr 25 1987 01:17 | 5 |
| Re: .59
"Speedo" is a brand of swimsuit, typically the "racing" kind.
Steve
|
68.61 | Swim Team '79 | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Sun Apr 26 1987 03:27 | 6 |
|
Also known as "Meat-hangers". They don't leave much to the
imagination. (Or so my Mom told me when I wore them in H.S.)
mike
|
68.62 | Gadzooks, shorts not allowed? | VAXRT::WILLIAMS | | Fri Aug 26 1988 14:05 | 5 |
| Shorts are "no-problem" in the mill. I habitually wear them in
the summer. My theory is that DEC hired me for what is above my
chin, not below.
/s/ Jim Williams
|