T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
38.1 | By the way... | TRCO01::HOBBS | | Wed Nov 26 1986 16:57 | 4 |
| I should have added that I'm a male wondering what the female
persepective is on this topic.
|
38.2 | No BVD's | CELICA::QUIRIY | Christine | Wed Nov 26 1986 17:10 | 7 |
|
Cotton, non-BVD (or Jockey, or Y-Front, or Fruit-of-the-Loom) type,
bikini, all colors (even white). A unisex sort of style. They don't
make 'em here in the U.S.
CQ
|
38.3 | the smaller the better ;-) | VORTEX::JOVAN | that's how it's gotta be... | Wed Nov 26 1986 17:15 | 1 |
|
|
38.4 | Ooops! | RDGE00::KERRELL | not a promissory note | Thu Nov 27 1986 08:14 | 10 |
| > -< the smaller the better ;-) >-
heh! you don't *really* mean that do you? have you thought what that
implies?
Let me re-phrase that for you;
the skimpier the better ;-)
Dave.
|
38.5 | won't want anyone to get the *wrong* idea! | VORTEX::JOVAN | that's how it's gotta be... | Thu Nov 27 1986 08:16 | 5 |
| > the skimpier the better
You're right! Thanks for pointing out my error ;-)
|
38.6 | Variety is the spice of life | RDGE00::MCGUIRE | Tweeky | Fri Nov 28 1986 11:31 | 7 |
| Anything but M & S. Everyone (males) is wearing them these days.
It gets awfully confusing .....
|
38.7 | Huh??? | ANT::WOLOCH | | Sun Nov 30 1986 22:39 | 11 |
| Re; .6, Whats M & S????
-naive nancy
|
38.8 | | 43570::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Mon Dec 01 1986 03:22 | 1 |
| Marks and Spencer - a quality UK clothing store.
|
38.9 | Opinion | RDGE40::KERRELL | | Mon Dec 01 1986 05:51 | 7 |
| > Marks and Spencer - a quality UK clothing store.
And more to the point a *very* boring one indeed.
Dave.
P.S. Lesley mine aren't M&S, but then of course you know that :^)
|
38.10 | What underwear? | NEBVAX::BELFORTE | The train is on time, HA! | Mon Dec 01 1986 12:11 | 1 |
| NONE!!!!!!!! :^}
|
38.11 | How about........ | CELICA::TAMMYG | | Mon Dec 01 1986 12:15 | 6 |
| Velcro
Otherwise your regular cotton underwear...... (Calvin Kleins are
good enough)
|
38.12 | French Under-Fashion | BALZAC::ROGGEBAND | A Suivre ===> | Tue Dec 02 1986 07:55 | 12 |
| Hi,
In France, the general fashion seems to be fancy pattern boxer shorts
(know here as "cale�on" !!)
I have asked various lady friends what they thought of them. Qualifiers
range from "Sexy!" to "Eeeek!"
Philippe.
P.S. M&S Y-fronts are definitely "out"!
|
38.14 | no BVDs | CSC32::KOLBE | Liesl-Colo Spgs- DTN 522-5681 | Tue Dec 02 1986 18:55 | 3 |
| Try the International Male catalog for sexy men's underwear. Of
course the models don't look like the kind of men that like the
ladies but there is some cute underwear. Liesl
|
38.15 | More on International Male | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Mon Dec 08 1986 12:05 | 21 |
|
> Try the International Male catalog for sexy men's underwear. Of
> course the models don't look like the kind of men that like the
> ladies but there is some cute underwear. Liesl
Too true!! My brother-in-law admits he's afraid to bend over with that
catalog in the room!!!
Seriously, tho', the catalog's clothes are very trendy and not-too-stylish
from the point of long-term styles... they have alot of Banana Republic
type stuff, and stuff you'd expect to see Crockett and the other one wearing
on Miami Vice.
But I've bought my husband dunagrees and some real comfy clothes there.
I have an extra catalog should anyone be interested. It's pricey,
but no worse than Jordan Marsh...
Send me mail and the first request gets the catalog, if anyone's interested.
Bugsy
|
38.16 | | NEWVAX::ADKINS | Mentally missing in action | Sat Dec 13 1986 01:53 | 20 |
| Re .15:
So what is the problem with your brother-in-law? Does he have a
fear of photographs? Or is this some kind of Archie Bunker/Jerry
Falwell sexist remark? Perhaps you should consider changing from
"Bugsy" to "Biggot-sy", it has that Nazi ring to it.
I wonder what the earlier remark implied about the models of the
Inernatinal Male catalog. The men in these tend toward the muscular
and trim. Does this imply that straight men tend to the fat and
flabby? Sounds like you have high standards and expectations.
Good looking = unobtainable = Gay ( Good logic )
I haven't looked into this file for about a week.
Now I think I remember why.
Jim
|
38.17 | First timer, are we? | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Mon Dec 15 1986 15:54 | 37 |
|
> So what is the problem with your brother-in-law? Does he have a
> fear of photographs?
No, just the usual single white male discomfort with homosexuals....
> Or is this some kind of Archie Bunker/Jerry
> Falwell sexist remark? Perhaps you should consider changing from
> "Bugsy" to "Biggot-sy", it has that Nazi ring to it.
Thanks for the benefit of the doubt.... It's such a joy to hear from
people in the know. Obviously you've run across other notes of mine in
which I denegrate homosexuality, categorize all gays as social misfits,
and in general, wouldn't want my brother to marry one!
If you'd reread my reply (or perhaps read it for the first time) you'll
notice that the opinions expressed by me about International Male were
about the style of clothing, NOT about the potential homosexuality of
the models.
And the fact that the men are attractive has NOTHING to do with those
assumptions! If you've ever seen the catalog, you'd see that the men
are all in extremely seductive poses, wear minimal amounts of clothing,
and, as a rule, don't interact with women!!
And what kind of assumptions are YOU dealing with in believing that
gay men can't be fat and flabby??
> I haven't looked into this file for about a week.
> Now I think I remember why.
Welcome back. I suppose from your reaction you're either gay and fat and
flabby, or straight and fat and flabby.
Next time, read the reply before you fly off the handle...
Bugsy
|
38.18 | I couldn't resist (where's my armor?) | ULTRA::ZURKO | Security is not pretty | Mon Dec 15 1986 17:12 | 3 |
| Bugsy, he's right, you are narrow minded. You forgot bi and fat
and flabby :-)
Mez
|
38.19 | Not my first, but definitely my last | NEWVAX::ADKINS | Mentally missing in action | Mon Dec 15 1986 21:31 | 91 |
| I'm going to reply your note as sort of a last act before riding off
into the sunset.
>Thanks for the benefit of the doubt.... It's such a joy to hear from
>people in the know. Obviously you've run across other notes of mine in
>which I denegrate homosexuality, categorize all gays as social misfits,
>and in general, wouldn't want my brother to marry one!
You imply that I am off-base because I have not read all of your
notes in this conference. One was enough. If I was to be honest,
you don't deserve the full blast on my reply. I think you should share
it with Liesl. She seems to think that she is good at playing
"Spot the Homo".
>> Try the International Male catalog for sexy men's underwear. Of
>> course the models don't look like the kind of men that like the
>> ladies but there is some cute underwear. Liesl
>
>Too true!! My brother-in-law admits he's afraid to bend over with that
>catalog in the room!!!
Granted, I have not read all of your notes. Perhaps you generally start
off your notes with a humorous twist. I'd be really sad to see that was
the case. That would mean that this blurb was what you considered to be
funny. Is your "brother-in-law" also afraid to set down his watermelons
in the same room with a copy of Ebony? Trite stereotypical garbage.
I felt that the comment was vulgar. Not in the sense of obscene, but
in the sense of rude and offensive.
>And the fact that the men are attractive has NOTHING to do with those
>assumptions! If you've ever seen the catalog, you'd see that the men
>are all in extremely seductive poses, wear minimal amounts of clothing,
>and, as a rule, don't interact with women!!
Don't interact with women? How do you know? They are models. They are
on the job. What do you want, a family portrait complete with the
basset hound? I get it. Since the L.L. Bean catalogs are co-ed, they
must all be straight.
>> I haven't looked into this file for about a week.
>> Now I think I remember why.
>
>Welcome back. I suppose from your reaction you're either gay and fat and
>flabby, or straight and fat and flabby.
Wrong. You do not win the Buick. I am gay but, sorry to disappoint you,
not fat and flabby. I realize that the bulk of your statement was geared
at fashion. But it was the first few lines that got me going.
I hadn't checked into MENNOTES for about a week and I'd like to go more
into why. Back in 14.0 I got into the lethargy found in this conference.
MEN ( its spring-board ) was a lot more lively. This file tends to lean
toward the mundane. Most of the discussions tend toward the day-to-day
of men's existence. There are a couple of topics that address some
of the psychological/emotional aspects of men, but the bulk leans to clothing,
habits, and various inanimate objects. I'm sorry kids, but I find that
a grade-A bore. I have to shave daily. I wear clothes. I can see what's
on me. I don't know what's IN you. That was what I was looking for in
this conference. MEN had it's rooster-strutting ( all in fun ) but it
also had a few notes in which people shared what went on inside their
heads. I think that comments like the one that I've gone after above
tend to make people think twice before stating much that would make them
appear vulnerable or open. They could be swooped down upon by some yahoo
with the sensitivity of a steel-belted radial.
Perhaps, I have over-reacted a bit. I just happen to NEXT UNSEEN ( trying
to find a topic worth following ) and landed right square on the one
Bugsy had posted. After reading just a few lines, I was completely put
off. Well, I'm tired on NEXT UNSEENing. After posting this one, I'm
following the advice I suggested in 14.
Bugsy, if you care to come back on this and you want me to read it,
please mail it to me ( upper left corner ). I won't be around here to
read it.
Kids, this conference will be what you make of it. I hope you make it
something better and more enriching that the majority of what's in
here now. The reason that I haven't contributed more should be
self-explanatory. But I'm past the point now caring what is thought about
me here. I'm gone.
Sorry to finally give up,
Jim
P.S. Bugsy, don't equate the fact that I'm gay with the idea that I
hate women. That is not the case at all. The members of this conference
that know me from other places know this to be true. I just found this
one response to be extremely offensive.
|
38.20 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | reeling in the flickering light | Tue Dec 16 1986 02:05 | 7 |
|
Whilst appreciating it is your perfect right to go away, please
remember that calling other noters "kids" is not the best way of
showing how reasonable you are and how unreasonable your opponents
are.
In short, being patronising doesn't buy you any friends.
|
38.21 | What's this got to do with skivvies? | BIGALO::FOOTER_JOE | | Tue Dec 16 1986 14:01 | 8 |
|
Did I miss something? I thought that he purpose of this note
was to invite women to state their preferences on men's underwear,
or lack thereof. Why then do we proceed to jump all over them when
they do? We start a topic and then go screaming off on an unrelated
tangent, it's no wonder that differences never get ironed out.
Are we that overly sensitive that we can't let them have their say?
|
38.24 | Jockey shorts is NOT generic | GUMDRP::MCCLURE | Who Me??? | Wed Dec 17 1986 09:13 | 16 |
| Well, I guess the time has arrived for me to re-state my opinion
in the previous version of this in the previous version of the file.
One very amusing thing to me, is to walk into a MENs room and see
some guy standing at the urinal with his trou completely undone
and trying not to let them fall whilst whizzing. At first, I scratched
my head and said 'what the...?'. Then it dawned on me. These guys
were going through all this trouble because they were wearing those
cute bikini briefs without an opening. I think guys who wear these
things are closet transvestites.
I wear regular briefs, I hate boxers (I prefer sugarless gum) and
I'd rather not have to worry about getting any appendages stuck
in the (YEOW) zipper. I wear v-neck t-shirts because I'd rather
have them get stained in the pits than my outer shirts and the
neck is still open.
|
38.25 | RE.24 that's stupid!!!! | USMRW6::RNICOLAZZO | Better living through chemistry | Tue Dec 23 1986 22:14 | 4 |
| Closet transvestits?????? I have to differ with you. I think the
type that does that is more trying to show how "macho" he is. I
happen to wear those "bikini" shorts and have never had the need
to drop my draws to my knees to take a piss.
|
38.26 | | RDGE40::KERRELL | with a little bit of top and side | Wed Dec 24 1986 04:35 | 8 |
| re .25:
Spot on! It was so obvious I didn't think anyone would mention it.
I can't wear the type with an opening because they don't make the
opening big enough.
Dave.
|
38.27 | Just curious... | KRELL::FRASER | Then, Now and Always... | Wed Dec 24 1986 04:47 | 5 |
| Re: .26 - would that be the front or back opening, Dave?
Andy
|
38.28 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI | Wed Dec 24 1986 11:04 | 3 |
|
Well, we're all agreed hereabouts. Dave obviously puts his underpants
on over his head.
|
38.29 | {RE .11} - Velcro? Ouch!!! | VAXUUM::DYER | Spot the Difference | Mon Jan 05 1987 02:10 | 0 |
38.30 | if you absolutely have to wear them...otherwise... | USMRW1::REDICK | | Fri Jan 16 1987 21:57 | 6 |
|
wear the "skimpy" bikinis with the mesh fabric on the sides!!!
|
38.31 | They take a week to get used to, but... | GENRAL::FRASHER | Master of Naught | Wed Feb 04 1987 19:23 | 18 |
| I only know of one man who drops his drawers to take a whiz and
he wears white jockey shorts with the opening (in the front). I
don't know if he uses the opening or not, I didn't look. I also
have no idea whether or not it would be big enough.
I'll pass over the transvestite comment.
My wife likes plain bikinis in colors, anything other than white
will do. I think it has something to do with white being so common
that its boring. No prints, just solid colors. She hates boxer
shorts with a passion.
I like cotton, I hate silk and nylon and net (they rub, I have one
pair that's been worn twice). I like them tight. I wear Spalding.
If I ever get caught skinny dipping in a mountain lake, I can put
them on really quick and they look just like swimming trunks. 8-O
Spence
|
38.32 | $.02 | MILRAT::KALLOCK | | Wed Aug 12 1987 16:09 | 21 |
|
Just for the record: I am a woman
I prefer all cotton boxer shorts without
an "old man" pattern (little diamond
shapes or something resembling shrunken
kitchen wallpaper designs); plaid
solid colors, or wild designs are
fine.
I despise jockey-type shorts aka "tidy
whities" Yecccch. I think they look
like diapers on grown men, but that's
just my opinion.
PS Bikinis on either sex are fine with
me on a body type where it is flattering.
bye
Ann
|
38.33 | | AKA::TAUBENFELD | Almighty SET | Wed Aug 12 1987 17:33 | 16 |
| I never got to read the old men notes file and have only read 38
topics in this note so far, but I have to disagree with all those
people about this being a boring note file!! I haven't laughed
this much in any other notes file!
I think .19 won the battle.
I have to agree with .31. I like a man in a solid colored cotton
bikini, tight, but not so small that he doesn't fit. I hate boxer
shorts. I think the slots in the front look silly even though they
save time. No underwear???? Gross, for men and women.
Sharon
|
38.34 | | RITZ::RKE | Man about THE_HOUSE | Wed Aug 19 1987 09:49 | 10 |
| > PS Bikinis on either sex are fine with
> me on a body type where it is flattering.
My body type is probibly ok for a bikini, but I'm undecided about
whether to get the sort where the bra just pops at the front, back
or get the one that just sort of slips over your head, what do you
think?
Richard.
|
38.35 | | KLAATU::THIBAULT | be-bop-a-lulu, baby | Wed Aug 19 1987 13:28 | 9 |
| RE: < Note 38.34 by RITZ::RKE "Man about THE_HOUSE" >
-< >-
>> or get the one that just sort of slips over your head, what do you
>> think?
I think you and GKE need to have a talk...:-)
Jenna
|
38.36 | I love 'em! | CSMADM::WATKINS | | Fri Aug 21 1987 13:57 | 16 |
| My S.O. had boring underwear, he had the regular 'whities' or an
occasional colored pair for "special occasions." I had to take
the matter into my own hands, and spiced his under-wardrobe up!
He now has bikinis (underwear, that is) in ever color (except white)
including tiger, leopard, zebra and see through. I love them!
He's got the perfect skinny bod for them-and I think they're great.
I've bought him every kind Frederick's sells, except for the kind
with the zipper in front (he's a little leery of those!) and we
don't go near the kind that have the little "extra pocket" for whatever
you want to put in it. (Little elephants, alligators, etc.) He
said he'd feel like a puppet show.
Stacie
(Lover of bikini underwear-but hater of men who wear them on the
beach. Really guys! They're underwear! Have some modesty! Here's
a topic in itself...)
|
38.37 | Mom hated those "meat-hangers" | DELNI::FOLEY | No WPS, just chains | Fri Aug 21 1987 16:37 | 10 |
| RE: .36
Certainly you're joking, right? I could just as easily say that
women are wearing thier undergarment on the beach too.. But
I won't cuz I don't mind in the least.. :-)
FWIW, I haven't worn "those" bikini bathing suits since High
School. (when I was on the swim team and swam 3-6 miles a day)
mike
|
38.38 | | DIEHRD::MAHLER | Yugo's for Yo Yo's | Tue Oct 13 1987 16:02 | 7 |
| RE:.36 by Stacie
� "...occasional colored pair for "special occasions." I had to take
� the matter into my own hands, and spiced his ..."
Are these two sentences related?
|
38.39 | Malaysia's kinko-chinko | MSAM01::DANIELNG | | Thu Feb 09 1989 01:10 | 11 |
| Well, in this hot weather of ours (Malaysia), the skimpier the better.
(Thanx for the tip on not saying the "smaller" the better) Enjoy
wearing the Byford brand (cause I sometimes get them free from my
cus who works there. Just kiddin!) Only wear them when at work because
it may be embarrassing at times. Do not wear them when I am with
jeans, especially tight ones. Do not like the flowery ones.
Could be interesting NOT to wear it with a sarong. Let all hang
loose.
Daniel
The kinko-chinko
|
38.40 | skimpier is better | SUBSYS::NEUMYER | sun your buns | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:34 | 16 |
|
Time to start this note up again...
Can't stand boxer shorts. Where do you put all the material under tight
jeans??
My preference runs to thong style. There is very little material to
pull and bind and they actually are very comfortable.
ed
BTW. Certain thongs even make great beachwear.
|
38.41 | | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:39 | 6 |
|
Thongs? Eeeeew! I call those "butt floss."
|
38.42 | Ouch! | CSTVAX::RONDINA | | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:46 | 3 |
| Thongs- aren't they those cheap rubber sandals you wear to the beach.
Gee, as underwear, hm! How would you wear'em?
|
38.43 | :-) | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | the social change one... | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:55 | 3 |
|
You have some courage asking that question to THIS crowd.
|
38.44 | | CRONIC::SCHULER | Your groove I do deeply dig | Thu Dec 06 1990 15:42 | 5 |
| Calvins ("Is that your name? 'Calvin?'") - briefs of course.
The only way to go....
:-)
|
38.45 | | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Thu Dec 06 1990 15:53 | 4 |
| During the business week: Fruit of the Loom will do.
On weekends & holidays: nothing's better than nothing at all.
LArry
|
38.46 | | DASXPS::HENDERSON | Son of a gun gonna have big fun | Thu Dec 06 1990 15:59 | 7 |
| I wear boxers most of time. I had the problem with them bunching up in
jeans (not real tight either). So I just quit wearing underwear with jeans.
Jim
|
38.47 | | CAPECD::HOLLAND | Life's A Breeze | Thu Dec 06 1990 16:30 | 4 |
|
Underwear?? who wears that???
Ken
|
38.49 | Bottom line.... | MORO::BEELER_JE | Rush Limbaugh , Jr. | Fri Dec 07 1990 02:29 | 18 |
| .48> Perry Ellis...Valentino's Bodywear...Frederick's of Hollywood....
Mercy me.....expen$ive stuff ....just drop me off at the J.C. Penney
store and I'll do fine...their jockey shorts are sufficient, for the
most part I'm the only one that sees me in them (not by choice), and,
they're .... inexpensive.
Although, I've recently discovered some 100% cotton tight fitting boxer
shorts at L.L. Bean that I REALLY like ... they're $8/pair ... maybe
I'm just too damned old, but, that seems expensive to me. I have a
little trouble paying that much for something that only I see, and,
when I'm with someone else in that "state" they usually come off quite
rapidly ... I don't recall anyone saying ".....my....what plain
underwear you have....."
Comfortable and cheap ... that's what I look for.
Jerry
|
38.50 | yuk! yuk! | KIRKTN::KANDERSON | the immaculate collection | Fri Dec 07 1990 05:41 | 12 |
|
An elderly couple go to their doctor for physical exams. The old man is nearly
deaf so the wife does most of the talking. At one point the doctor says to the
old man "I'm going to need a blood sample, a stool sample, a urine sample, and
a semen sample from you, Sir". The old man leans towards his wife and says
"Wadd 'e say?". His wife leans over and shouts in his ear "He says he wants
to see your underwear!"
Katrina.
|
38.51 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | No artificial sweeteners | Fri Dec 07 1990 10:10 | 2 |
| Plain white Jockey Y fronts. Not flashy, but functional, and I always put
function before form.
|
38.52 | old/worn/raggedy | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Fri Dec 07 1990 10:18 | 1 |
|
|
38.53 | The king is dead, long live the king... | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Dec 07 1990 10:30 | 9 |
|
> Underwear?? who wears that???
When I was in highschool, they called this "Going Elvis."
;-)
--Ger
|
38.54 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | I thought t'was the parking brake | Fri Dec 07 1990 10:58 | 16 |
|
RE: Ger
>> Underwear?? who wears that???
>When I was in highschool, they called this "Going Elvis."
why?
kits
|
38.56 | | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | Hello hello hello hello hello | Fri Dec 07 1990 15:26 | 3 |
| not to mention the nifty colors, or stripes, or polka dot patterns.
when i wear plain, i feel plain. when i wear exciting.......
|
38.57 | | MACROW::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Mon Dec 10 1990 14:17 | 5 |
|
� ... but they lasted over a year...
Aren't you supposed to change them every couple of weeks?
|
38.59 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Mon Dec 10 1990 16:07 | 16 |
| >>> Underwear?? who wears that???
>>When I was in highschool, they called this "Going Elvis."
> why?
I tried explaining it three times in replies that I've deleted. None
of them really explained it well.
I'll pull a Mojo Nixon and say that, well, it's just in the "spirit" of
Elvis (the Pelvis).
Don't read too much into it.
--Ger
|
38.60 | Maybe wearing boxers BACKWARDS???... | DOOLIN::HNELSON | Evolution in action | Tue Dec 11 1990 08:56 | 10 |
| I wear boxers, as part of my become-a-biological-father campaign, and I
am perpetually bothered because they will NOT keep me covered! My male
protuberance (can we say that on TV?) in its passive, flacid state very
frequently pokes out that ridiculous hole in the front. Does ANYONE use
the hole they (thoughtfully?) provide in underwear? It's a drag: on
long walks I'm abraided, and end up reaching through my pockets trying
to twist the boxers around so the gap isn't exactly opposite my
dangling potatoberance (<-- Pogo-ism). D-U-M-B, everyone's accusin' me.
- Hoyt
|
38.61 | necessity is the.... | LEZAH::BOBBITT | trial by stone | Tue Dec 11 1990 08:57 | 8 |
| *ahem* - have you thought of attaching some velcro on the outside part
of the inner flap and the inside part of the outer flap so you can seal
it shut comfortably? Snaps might abrade, but Velcro
shouldn't....particularly if the two parts are the same size and hitch
together completely....
-Jody
|
38.62 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Tue Dec 11 1990 09:08 | 1 |
| Velcro is unnecessary -- just sew it up. wil
|
38.63 | | DECXPS::HENDERSON | Or it could have been the wind | Tue Dec 11 1990 10:26 | 7 |
| Or wear them backwards ;^)
Jim
|
38.64 | Comfy alternative when rather not sleep nude... BUT :-) | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | the social change one... | Tue Dec 11 1990 10:46 | 12 |
|
If there's a real reason for having the flap be so ridiculously
large that one could fit an entire leg thru it, then why at least
don't they provide enough over-lap material over the flap to make
up for it? That's the part that get's me... at least give us men a
fighting chance of not embarrassing unexpected guests we happen to
find unexpectedly in our living rooms as we walk down from bed on
a late Saturday morning. :-)
-Erik (for better boxer-short reform)
|
38.65 | :-o | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Tue Dec 11 1990 10:58 | 5 |
|
I'm more worried about poking out the bottom than through the flap.
|
38.66 | IMPORTANT SURVEY! | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Tue Dec 11 1990 11:16 | 16 |
|
I was talking to a friend about a year ago, and the subject of
urination came up. When I told her about male etiquette at the
urinals, (y'know, you must stare at the Sloan Valve Company flusher)
she was surprised to hear that many men are "over the top" when
urinating. She thought that ALL MEN were through the flap. I told her
that I knew noone who goes through the flap. She proceeded to take a
survey at work (I don't know how she got them to reply, or did she rig
something up in the men's room?) but from her sampling, it seemed about
50/50. I would like to verify her study through this more technical
survery.
Are you and "over the top" or "through the flap"?
|
38.67 | | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Tue Dec 11 1990 11:35 | 9 |
| Over the top, in this and all facets of my life.
Going through the flap can be a nuisance, especially after puberty;
kind'a like trying to stuff a sleeping bag in public.
Other behaviors in this arena can be surveyed but they have nothing
to do with men's underwear.
LArry
|
38.68 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | No artificial sweeteners | Tue Dec 11 1990 12:23 | 3 |
| > I'm more worried about poking out the bottom than through the flap.
Hint: don't pull the waist band up to your nipples. :-)
|
38.69 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Tue Dec 11 1990 14:17 | 2 |
| over the top! wil
|
38.70 | Oy! I think I'm different. | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Tue Dec 11 1990 16:03 | 3 |
|
Boxers: Through the flap
Jockey: Lifting the side (childhood habit, I guess)
|
38.71 | ;-) | RAVEN1::PINION | Hard Drinking Calypso Poet | Wed Dec 12 1990 00:17 | 5 |
| ...you're supposed to pull It (big jim & the twins) out first?????!!!
uh-oh...
Capt.Scott
|
38.72 | Me Too | ROULET::JOERILEY | | Wed Dec 12 1990 01:51 | 5 |
| re:.70
> Jockey: Lifting the side (childhood habit, I guess)
You're not alone I've been doing this for as long as I can remember.
|
38.75 | Hole | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Wed Dec 12 1990 13:31 | 2 |
| Through the hole. Thats what its there for, thats what I use it for.
|
38.76 | :^) | DEC25::BERRY | I'm Bart Simpson. Who the Hell are you? | Thu Dec 13 1990 04:46 | 6 |
|
>>>Through the hole. Thats what its there for, thats what I use it for.
I ain't say'n nothing.
-db
|
38.77 | Which way out | ATSE::KATZ | | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:27 | 27 |
| I consider it a real challenge and sometimes a painful one to attempt to
maneuver it thru the tight slit in jockey shorts, however (and I didn't notice
anyone mention this aspect) I rarely leave my pants buckled and attempt to
maneuver thru the zipper, as I hate contacting sharp metal. And I rarely ever
forget to put it back inside before closing my zipper. But I'll admit that on
those rare occasions I have to wonder who ever invented such a torture device.
I find boxers to be fun for bedtime, or even watching TV or reading, and I think
its kind of cute the way Mr Wiggly finds a way out either the bottom or the slit
By the way, I once spent about ten minutes meditating on Mr Wiggly while I was
sunbathing on a nude beach. It seemed like he had a life of his own. I guess
what happens is that there is a complex arrangement of nerves, muscles and
whatever, that seem to be trying to acheive a comfortable position, but after
a few seconds there is something wrong with that position and a new one needs to
be found. It just goes on and on and on (like watching a curious worm).
Hey, next time you go to the bathroom, why not stop and ask Mr. Wiggly how he
wants to come out.
Has anyone figured out how to avoid spraying when you first start to urinate. It
seems like I am perpetually cleaning the floor (and once in a horrible while it
gets on my pants - but I figured out how to cover up for that, just splash water
all over myself and claim that the bathroom sink was malfunctioning).
(After reading this, I decided to hold my breath and send it. I figure I must
be in a pretty silly mood today, hopefully you'll find some of it humorous).
|
38.78 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | I thought t'was the parking brake | Thu Dec 13 1990 12:38 | 12 |
| <-----::KATZ
>(After reading this, I decided to hold my breath and send it. I figure I must
>be in a pretty silly mood today, hopefully you'll find some of it humorous).
I pretty near fell of my chair laughing....
thanks
ktis
|
38.79 | Variations on a theme.... | AKOV06::SWS_EPS_DEV | | Thu Dec 13 1990 13:13 | 23 |
| re: <<< Note 38.77 by ATSE::KATZ >>>
>Has anyone figured out how to avoid spraying when you first start to urinate.
It
>seems like I am perpetually cleaning the floor (and once in a horrible while
it
>gets on my pants - but I figured out how to cover up for that, just splash
water
>all over myself and claim that the bathroom sink was malfunctioning).
I used to be a chronic sprayer. Then I figured out that if I increased the
pressure of the flow most of the problem was solved. So now I apply some
external clamping until the internal release has been completed, then release
with more-than-a-dribble pressure.
I employ one other variation when in that state where aiming downward is not
possible. Just use the toilet in the sitting position, and lean forward (no
clamping needed since spraying in that position is appropriate). I used to
try to wait for the erection to thaw before relieving myself, but found
that the constricting to prevent seepage also acted to maintain the
erection. Now I find with this new variation that once the consticting
stops, the thaw can proceed.
|
38.80 | | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:29 | 5 |
|
Or you can use a urinal while doing a headstand.
|
38.81 | | SALEM::KUPTON | Clemens,Welch,Clark & Bruno | Thu Dec 13 1990 15:23 | 6 |
| I just put my foot on the urinal and roll down my sock.....8^)
Through the hole.......
K
|
38.82 | cut it out..you guys ;-) | IAMOK::MITCHELL | I thought t'was the parking brake | Thu Dec 13 1990 16:28 | 10 |
|
I have just realized that I cannot read Mennotes while
in the office anymore. My laughing/crying.....falling
off the chair....mascara running down my cheeks has
caused strangers to walk into my office to see if
I was okay.
|
38.83 | look ma! no hands! | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu Dec 13 1990 17:01 | 16 |
| if i ever hear my wife (or any woman, for that matter) complain again
about the inequitities of being a woman and not able to stop off the
road for a quick whiz, I'll show her this string.
i never knew men suffered so while vertically releiving themselves in
front of the urinal! what a revelation! i don't have to feel sorry
for the poor woman who must squat to avoid soiling her sox.
i remember, lo those many years ago, being taught (was it my mama
or was it the boot-camp drill instructor?) to pee without even wetting
my hands. to think of it... there are those among us who must worry
about wetting their *pants*!
tony
|
38.84 | Check the wind, too. | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Thu Dec 13 1990 22:07 | 5 |
| .83 reminds me, it was in boot camp that I learned to worry about the
wind. It was blowing in a circle about the little shelter that day.
:-(
ed
|
38.86 | | MICROW::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Fri Dec 14 1990 10:38 | 6 |
|
A bad case of morning thickness.
|
38.87 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | I'm the Lord of the Wastelands | Fri Dec 14 1990 11:59 | 18 |
|
Talk about having a good laugh after lunch ! Three managers
walked by my office on the way to Plant Staff meeting in the
conference room beside my office and I was doubled over,
holding my stomach, laughing my fool head off ! If I get my
pink slip, I'll be telling them why ! :^)
Now. . .
Over the top and Fruit of the Loom `kini briefs. (You know,
with the dental floss sides ? :^))
Now I wonder if I can gain my composure back to make it
through the rest of the day !
<whew> !
Matt
|
38.88 | | AXIS::GERTZ | You Teach What You Most Need To Learn | Fri Dec 14 1990 14:06 | 6 |
| Haven't written a note in Notes in a long, long time. I had to
tell you that you guys are hysterically funny! It's a genuine
pleasure to read through a topic with so many replies and laugh
through the entire string.
Charlene
|
38.89 | | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | And time can do so much... | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:02 | 16 |
|
I think we need a few new topics to avoind ratholes. I suggest the
following:
Proper Urinal Etiquette.
The pee-shy note.
Why do others look?
Shaking techniques that make it look as though you have a big one.
-marc
|
38.90 | The master of the effect... :-) | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | the social change one... | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:17 | 5 |
| > Shaking techniques that make it look as though you have a big one.
See Fred Sanford of "Sanford and Sons".... :-)
|
38.91 | "The Lord's been good to me ..." | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:45 | 3 |
| Frankly, I've never needed shaking techniques.
LArry
|
38.92 | Check the time AFTER you finish... | ISLNDS::CALHOUN | | Fri Dec 14 1990 16:26 | 9 |
| One quick lesson I learned the hard way. If you're standing at
the urinal, and you suddenly realize that you might be late for
a meeting, be sure to let go before you check your watch!!!
(What a mess! Never did make it to the meeting....)
Rich
|
38.93 | I micturated from Harvard | STAR::RDAVIS | This is your brain on caffeine | Fri Dec 14 1990 17:38 | 10 |
| Those groovy new cotton-pouch brief-jockstrap-whatsits are the next best
thing to nothing (and "nothing" is pretty uncomfortable under rough
denim). But they're flyless, so over is the only way.
The surprise 180-degree-coverage problem is why I usually don't seize
the male perogative and stand when visiting women's apartments. I
figure this bit of chivalry extends their toilet-cleaning cycle
considerably.
Mr. Manners
|
38.94 | | BIGUN::SIMPSON | Put your left leg in, pull a bloody stump out | Tue Dec 18 1990 01:54 | 3 |
| Joan Rivers says she can tell how good a lover a man is by the way he
goes to the toilet... after all, if he can't hit a hole _that_ big
standing still and with the light on...
|
38.95 | FUNNY!!!!!!!! | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Tue Dec 18 1990 11:36 | 1 |
|
|
38.96 | Lefties have rights too, taken to an extreme | CASDEV::SALOIS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 14:24 | 14 |
|
Well, I've noticed briefs open to the right...
what if you "hang" the other way....???
does anyone know why they open on the right? Is this a conspiracy?
And one other helpful hint....
When wearing light colored pants .... always, always be very
careful when shaking.... it's rather embarassing getting spots
on your trousers... know what I mean?
|
38.97 | | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | let it snow, damn it! | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:05 | 5 |
|
Then join the "over the top" contingent.
|
38.98 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:50 | 16 |
|
As moderator:
We've kinda crossed the line with this discussion, folks.
I'm probably at fault for letting it go on this long, but,
oh well, I'm human (and I was having a good time, too).
Let's refrain from discussions RE Mr. Wiggly, please.
(General noting policy is that you don't talk explicitly
about sexual body parts.)
Also, let's keep the topic on underwear and off of Mr. Wiggly.
Thanks.
--GerGrinch
|
38.99 | Hazard labels are necessary | CASDEV::SALOIS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 16:14 | 10 |
|
going over the top is alright as long as you're not wearing anything
with an elastic waistband...
Ever let go of the waistband at an inopportune time???
SNAP!!
ouch!
|
38.100 | Sorry...Gerry...I couldn't help myself. | IAMOK::MITCHELL | I thought t'was the parking brake | Tue Dec 18 1990 16:47 | 12 |
|
RE GerGrinch
> Also, let's keep the topic on underwear and off of Mr. Wiggly.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Why do you want to keep Mr. Wiggly exposed Ger ?? :-)
kits
|
38.101 | Perfectly relevent! | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | let it snow, damn it! | Tue Dec 18 1990 16:56 | 5 |
|
Where would underwear be without Mr Wiggly?
|
38.103 | | BIGUN::SIMPSON | tired of it all... | Tue Dec 18 1990 21:38 | 3 |
| Well, surely you must admit that at times the male unmentionable
appendage _does_ seem to lead a life of its own... does what it wants
and not what you do...
|
38.104 | Down Simba ! 8^) | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Wed Dec 19 1990 02:56 | 4 |
| Yeah, and "Mr. Wiggly" can make you change *your* mind as well ! It's a
fact, hormones doing 110mph can kill brain cells on contact ! 8^)
Scary (who's thought using his pants before ...)
|
38.105 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Wed Dec 19 1990 06:58 | 8 |
|
men's underwear "opens" to the right because most men are right handed
(though a suggestion that the right hand would be used in this
situation might cause severe revulsion in some mid-Asian countries
where the langauge suggests that the left hand is de rigeur for toilet
functions.)
/. Ian .\
|
38.106 | Couldn't resist!! | CXCAD::SCHUBERT | Do-it-youself Lobotomy Kits, $19.88 | Wed Dec 19 1990 10:45 | 7 |
|
re: .101
Where would underwear be without Mr Wiggly?
On a woman?
|
38.107 | :-) | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | the social change one... | Wed Dec 19 1990 10:57 | 3 |
|
Ooo, that was sooo *bad*. :-)
|
38.108 | Another plea to get back to the topic... | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Wed Dec 19 1990 11:53 | 7 |
|
..."Underwear"! "Underwear" is the topic, folks. ;-)
Thanks.
--GrinchGerFromHellPart2
|
38.110 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | I thought t'was the parking brake | Wed Dec 19 1990 12:25 | 9 |
|
> How do you get skidmarks out without using bleach?
I hope Mr. Wiggly wasn't in them when they got run over.
kits
|
38.111 | | SWAM3::ANDRIES_LA | and so it goes ... | Wed Dec 19 1990 13:05 | 4 |
| Skidmarks? Skidmarks! Ya gotta get in there and wipe harder. :^)
Merry Christmas,
LArry
|
38.112 | | KHUMBU::SEVIGNY | let it snow, damn it! | Wed Dec 19 1990 13:13 | 5 |
|
Throw them away, and learn proper anal hygeine.
|
38.113 | Must be today... | CXCAD::SCHUBERT | Do-it-youself Lobotomy Kits, $19.88 | Wed Dec 19 1990 14:57 | 6 |
|
> How do you get skidmarks out without using bleach?
See your secretary or office supply store and get some white out...
|
38.114 | Children ... all of you .. | MORO::BEELER_JE | Rush Limbaugh , Jr. | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:19 | 7 |
| Never before have I laughed so much ... what welcome comic relief on a
rotten DECwork day ....
"Mr. Wiggly" indeed ... well, I've been getting quite a laugh out of
the childish antics .. and .. so has Mr. King Kong ...
Jerry
|
38.115 | | HANNAH::MODICA | | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:21 | 5 |
|
Mr King Kong?????
Good grief what's next???
The predator?
|
38.116 | oh!? you want them white??? | MERCRY::SALOIS | | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:25 | 18 |
|
nah...
Is that a tic tac in your pocket????
Seriously, though skid marks are a problem for some people.
Hints from Heloise suggests the following solution;
Mix these ingredients
1 cup baking soda
2 tbsp marvel mystery oil
3 qts midnight blue enamel paint
4 lbs raisin bran
Using a wide spatula paste this all over your briefs...
and voila! the rest of your shorts match the stain!!
|
38.117 | .....thud....... | MORO::BEELER_JE | Rush Limbaugh , Jr. | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:26 | 4 |
| .115> Good grief what's next???
.115> The predator?
Nope ... "Giant" ...
|
38.118 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | bread&roses | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:38 | 1 |
| pencil?
|
38.119 | :*) | CSS::FRASER | But I don't have an accent; you do! | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:51 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 38.118 by WMOIS::B_REINKE "bread&roses" >>>
> pencil?
Speaking of pencils, Bonnie - I always wondered; what do the
letters HB stand for on some pencils, and is this relevant?
a
|
38.120 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | bread&roses | Wed Dec 19 1990 17:52 | 3 |
| no idea !
:-)
|
38.122 | | BTOVT::BAGDY_M | I'm the Lord of the Wastelands | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:04 | 6 |
|
RE: `HB' on a pencil
HB = Heavy Ballistics
Matt
|
38.123 | OK, maybe they are butt-floss | NITTY::DIERCKS | Bent, in a straight world... | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:53 | 14 |
|
... thong style undies under work clothes -- can't have those
panty-lines, ya' know!
... no undies under jeans (unless I happen to be at work)
... I'm an "over" the top person, also.
... the undies are in various colors, must most white and they
MUST be 100% cotton, always!
|
38.124 | with this information I expect interesting pencil comments :-) | CVG::THOMPSON | Does your manager know you read Notes? | Fri Dec 21 1990 09:09 | 8 |
| RE: HB on pencils. It's an indication of the hardness of the lead.
HB is fairly soft for writing. The next hardest is H then 2H and
up. I've seen as hard as 9H for drafting. The next softest lead (after
HB) is B then 2B etc. Artists tend to use the softer leads. So HB is
soft of in the middle. Not much good for anything I do as I tend
to make a mess with leads that soft.
Alfred
|
38.125 | | WORDY::GFISHER | Work that dream and love your life | Fri Dec 21 1990 11:24 | 6 |
|
I just got silk boxers for Christmas! I haven't had a chance to wear
them, yet.
--Ger
|
38.126 | | PEKING::BAKERT | Too HOT to handle,too COOL to be BLUE | Fri Dec 21 1990 11:53 | 1 |
| can we share the experience
|
38.127 | TV neuroses: B.O., morning mouth, dandruff, ... PANTY-LINES? | DOOLIN::HNELSON | Evolution in action | Fri Dec 21 1990 12:50 | 4 |
| What's all this about panty-lines? I could care less. Is that because I
don't watch TV?
- Hoyt
|
38.128 | Who cares about TV, it's the people around you. :-) | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | the social change one... | Fri Dec 21 1990 13:17 | 6 |
| > Is that because I don't watch TV?
Or notice other people smirking around you??? :-) [<- BIG :-)]
-Erik
|
38.129 | | FDCV07::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Fri Dec 21 1990 13:18 | 4 |
| re .102
"your weewee"?
|
38.130 | | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Fri Dec 21 1990 13:35 | 8 |
| RE .128
That was really cruel, Erik, to point out to Hoyt
that everyone is smirking around him... He was
unaware of that before your mean remark. Just
'cause he's not savvy about panty-lines, is no
reason to pick on him...
Wil
|
38.131 | | CRONIC::SCHULER | Your groove I do deeply dig | Fri Dec 21 1990 14:10 | 6 |
| RE: .130
Knowing Erik, I think he was trying to prevent the trauma
that may come from continued disregard for trouser appearance.
/Greg
|
38.132 | Operation 'Just Cause'... :-) | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | the social change one... | Fri Dec 21 1990 14:25 | 6 |
|
Sorry to blow the gag guys... didn't realize this was a source of
amusment for so many people. [The suffering of a few for the good
of the many??] :-) :-)
-Erik
|
38.133 | I guess I'm the butt of your jokes, huh? | DOOLIN::HNELSON | Evolution in action | Fri Dec 21 1990 16:49 | 9 |
| I just asked my best friend why he didn't tell me, and he said my
"panty-line problem" was trivial compared to my personal hygiene
failings.
Which reminds me: does anyone else collect beard dandruff? I keep mine
in a Mason jar, and someday I hope to add some sizing and mold it into
a life-size sculptor of my head.
- Hoyt
|
38.134 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Minus 1 day and waiting | Fri Dec 21 1990 16:55 | 8 |
| Hoyt,
some people also save ear wax, belly button lint and (if they
are furry all over) body dandruff...
:-)
Bonnie
|
38.135 | keep this going !!! | JUPITR::BHOGAN | | Sun Nov 08 1992 22:10 | 8 |
|
Once I saw a joke in the men's room wall it said....
The joke aint on the wall it's in your hand.... 8^)
only me johnny B)
|