T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
28.1 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Thu Nov 20 1986 19:15 | 2 |
| Of course, my dad used to say that life with my mum made every day
a lifetime long, but he was joking.....I think :-)
|
28.2 | Quality not Quantity is what counts. | DONNER::MARTIN | Over forty victim of fate | Fri Nov 21 1986 03:08 | 12 |
|
I think it's because men tend to burn the candle at both
ends more often, especially at younger ages.
C.
|
28.5 | Just dying to have fun! | HYDRA::LYMAN | Village Idiot | Fri Nov 21 1986 08:30 | 4 |
|
A guy can only take being "bitched at all the time" for so long.
Jake
|
28.6 | | STAR::TOPAZ | | Fri Nov 21 1986 08:31 | 14 |
| Men do everything more quckly and efficiently. So they get done in 40
years what it takes a woman 70 years to even begin to do. Anything
that a man does past 40 is just a bonus.
re .4:
Wrong. Men take hotter showers than women (because we're tougher),
but our body hair protects the skin. Of course, it's true that we
don't use the stuff that women use, Oil of OyVay. I dunno if that
crap protects your skin, but it certainly gunks up the shower.
Respectfully,
--Mr Topaz
|
28.8 | | VORTEX::JOVAN | you've got what i want..... | Fri Nov 21 1986 08:47 | 3 |
| hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
thanks Suzanne!
|
28.9 | Interesting data when marital status is added. | MAHLER::DEROSA | Well... here we are. | Fri Nov 21 1986 08:54 | 11 |
| To inject some additional information --- this topic seems to be
taking a dive off the deep end, but what the heck --- marriage plays
a role in longevity as well. In order of decreasing lifespan:
married woman
married man
single woman
single man
I don't have the hard numbers at my fingertips. But I read this in some
reputable magazine/newspaper article a short time ago.
|
28.10 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Fri Nov 21 1986 09:06 | 1 |
| Any additional data about whether parenthood affects the figures?
|
28.11 | Tougher??? Hmmmm | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | | Fri Nov 21 1986 09:26 | 14 |
| Re. 6:
>>Wrong. Men take hotter showers than women (because we're tougher),
Really now..
Wrongggg. Men take hotter showers because they're (you) are not
as well informed as us women. We know that taking hot showers
cause the blood to rush to the face, creating capillaries and
broken veins to appears ALL OVER YOUR FACE, making you a likely
candidate for the next Stephen King movie.
Jeanne
|
28.12 | What happens if??? | KRYPTN::HITCHCOCK | Go ahead! Make my day! | Fri Nov 21 1986 10:47 | 10 |
|
RE: .9
Oh! Oh!!
What happens when you've been married three times (glutton for punishment)
and now single again. Wonder what that does to the ol' stats..........do I
die quicker or live three times as long??
/hh
|
28.13 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Reality is frequently inaccurate | Fri Nov 21 1986 11:31 | 13 |
| Being serious for a moment - I recall reading that if you remove
war as a cause of early death for males, the average lifespans come
a lot closer. But I also agree that now that women are more heavily
into the bad habits that kill off men (smoking, stress, etc.) that
things will balance out. In some countries, men have slightly longer
lifespans.
As for marriage - recent studies show that unmarried males have
a significantly shorter lifespan than do married males, but the
same is NOT true for women. (According to "Adelaide's Lament",
all single women get is the flu.)
Steve
|
28.14 | Ladies! Please! Take this in jest!! :-) :-) | DEBET::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Fri Nov 21 1986 11:35 | 16 |
| RE: .6
No,no,no... We take hot showers cuz we have been doing Manly
things like watching football while the oldest son is mowing
the lawn. My Dad used to break out in a hell of a sweat! Taking
a hot shower also helps the skin age in a manly way. After all,
we don't get wrinkles.. We get character lines.. :-) (I feel
womankind looking down on me now saying "You'll be celibate
for the rest of your life")
Oh yes, another thing.. Men can still father a child at age
70. Women just last longer cuz they say "Children make you younger"
and it's USUALLY the Mom taking care of the kids... Afterall,
wouldn't want to miss the Pats game, now would we?
mike
|
28.16 | | DEBET::FOLEY | Rebel without a clue | Fri Nov 21 1986 13:38 | 10 |
|
We have the Pats for a football team.. That's reason enough to
sweat! :-) :-) :-)
No football widows in Colorado?? (and no mowed lawns?)
PSF's....
mike
|
28.19 | keep trying | FRSBEE::THEROUX | THEA | Fri Nov 21 1986 16:22 | 10 |
| RE:12
No statistics to base my opinions,,,,,,,but I think that perhaps
you are sentenced to longevity,,, to try and try, and try,
untill you have got IT right, furthermore to climb-up 5 flights
of stairs, will benefit a excellent physical condition.
enjoy trying
Thea
|
28.20 | Another of our 17 reasons to not join a notes discussion | VERDI::DEROSA | Well... here we are. | Fri Nov 21 1986 17:17 | 8 |
| There's a time and place for serious discussion, and there's a time and
place for flippant discussion. But it's tough to find a time or place
for both types of comments within a notes topic; sometimes both within
a single note.
I'd be very interested in continuing a discussion of the effects
of marriage, divorce, parenthood, and sex upon lifespan. If we
can keep things serious.
|
28.22 | Went West, will write soon.. | NEXUS::MORGAN | Walk in Balance... | Fri Nov 21 1986 18:15 | 9 |
| All seriousness aside:
The Broncoloes have been sold out since whenever because Bronco's
fans are somewhat "west" of the Rockies anyway.
I fully expect the life spans of men and women to even out any day now
anyway.
Mikie?
|
28.23 | smoking, and nothing but | CACHE::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Fri Nov 21 1986 23:40 | 13 |
| I've have heard insurance companies claim that the major cause of
the difference in lifespan is smoking. period. As more women are
smoking, their average age is being reduced, and as more men quit
smoking, their age is being increased. The insurance companies have
been trying to eliminate the difference in premiums based on sex,
and base them on smoking.
If anybody knows statistics, its insurance companies.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
28.25 | | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Sun Nov 23 1986 06:40 | 7 |
|
I'm sure that looking after our kids whilst I'm sedentary at work
keeps Wendy much more fit than I am.
So she'll be fit enough to live longer than me.
She only *feels* dead by the time we get the kids to bed! :-)
|
28.26 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee | Mon Nov 24 1986 11:03 | 6 |
| Response 24 has been set hidden pending resolution of a complaint
we have recieved.
Your understanding is appreciated.
- M
|
28.27 | How's married to who? | BETHEL::THOMPSON | Noter of the LoST ARK | Mon Nov 24 1986 11:29 | 4 |
| On the humorous side, I've heard it explained that women live
longer because they are not married to women.
Alfred
|
28.28 | was it good for you too? | CSC32::KOLBE | Liesl-Colo Spgs- DTN 522-5681 | Mon Nov 24 1986 19:35 | 7 |
| >re .6
>Men do everything more quckly and efficiently. So they get done in 40
>years what it takes a woman 70 years to even begin to do. Anything
>that a man does past 40 is just a bonus.
Quickly and efficiently is no fun in bed. :-) Liesl
|
28.29 | Was *what* good for me too? | RDGENG::LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE, OSI. | Tue Nov 25 1986 03:20 | 2 |
|
Just goes to show that quickness .ne. efficiency.
|
28.30 | ah-men ! | CANDY::POTUCEK | CLASSIFIED | Tue Nov 25 1986 14:16 | 8 |
| RE:
.27 Right-on Mr. Thompson !!
;-)
<CIA>
|
28.33 | how long do lesbians live? | ULTRA::GUGEL | living in the present | Tue Dec 02 1986 18:34 | 11 |
| re .27
So how long is the average life expectancy of lesbians? Let's get
all the facts here before making subjective judgements :-)
Seriously, more men I know have lousy diets than women I know.
Every fifth or sixth guy I meet has vegetable-phobia and more men
I know have an obsession for fatty red meats than do women I know.
Diet *does* have something to do with how long you live (if you
listen to the so-called experts).
-Ellen
|
28.34 | Theres a good reason ... | RANCHO::RAH | Did I studduh? | Tue Dec 09 1986 14:57 | 17 |
| I think that single men have shorter lifespans because of
their ill-defined position in society - look at apes...
Some male apes woo and mate e.g. form families and become
socially acceptable. Unattched ones are threats to all
and so are chased away from the main tribe where they
exist on the fringes of ape society. Nature apparently
regulates ape populations (at least partially) by shutting
out the extra males so that the settled family units can
enjoy a more stable social environment. The stress of being
excess to the tribe is absorbed by the single males. In
human society, war used to serve this function. Now the stresses
are internalized and show up as health and phsycological problems.
Females remain acceptable as singles in human (and ape) society
because they are percieved as non-threatening to the family unit.
That help?
|
28.36 | Simian Culture Colloquium 298B | RANCHO::RAH | raving network animal | Wed Dec 10 1986 21:31 | 15 |
| Hmmm...well as I remember from ..was it Wild Nature, or maybe it
was Wooly America ? No, there are no apes here (are there?) , anyway
I seem to recall that the single female apes always formed
the working class, if you will, of the tribe. I know more
about any topic more than I know about single female apes,
but it seems to me that the tribes have a matriarch who kind
of rules the family territory and chases off stray single male
apes (she got a mean swipe!) and a Big Boss ape who mates with
as many of the single female apes as she can while covering his
flanks against the foolish young single apes who might be tempted
to muscle in on his preserve. Usually the young bloods get chased
down the river to lick their wounds far from home. As for agnostics,
I don't know. There are two out here (Woodside, Ca) who communicate
so maybe someone will ask them how they feel about God. As for how
a single female ape might respond, I haven't a clue.
|
28.37 | Power Plays a Key Part | VAXUUM::DYER | It's Bedtime for Bonzo | Thu Dec 11 1986 03:22 | 12 |
| {RE .33} - I would say it depends on how "traditional" the relationship is.
That is, whether or not there's some kind of dominant/submissive arrangement.
Same goes for gay men, as well.
One thing we don't usually see in these statistics is the power relationship.
These statistics (including the stuff in Reply #9) are dominated by hetero-
sexual relationships in which the male holds the power. Shifting the power
or distributing it more fairly changes the picture a lot.
<_Jym_>
P.S.: I don't know the statistics for diets, but I know I eat a lot better
than my (female) S.O.
|
28.38 | Git outta my way, lady!!! | GENRAL::FRASHER | Master of naught | Mon Feb 02 1987 18:32 | 35 |
| I'm curious what 'SO' is, but afraid to ask. It'll probably come
out as I weed my way through the notes. So far, I've assumed that
it is 'sexual object', but I'm probably wrong.
Basing my thoughts on the past, rather than the present, boys were
brought up to be more competitive than girls. Boys faught, played
competitive games (football, etc.), and never to let another boy
out do them. Girls played with dolls, were 'feminine' and didn't
play competitive games but were taught to be more of a housewife.
When they became teenagers, and got cars, the boys were competitive
behind the wheel, had to be faster and meaner than all of the other
cars. Girls viewed a car as transportation. I tried and tried
to get my girlfriend to drag race with me and she wouldn't do it.
I just had to prove that my '50 Mercury was faster than her '58
Chevy. She sold her car in mint condition, I totally mine on a
tree in a snow storm, screwing around. I broke my nose and spent
the night in the hospital. That's why boys/men under age 25, pay
more insurance than girls/women do. When my wife and I are driving
different vehicles, I leave her behind because she does the speed
limit and I can't stand to have someone pass me. And we are both
34 years old. I still feel the competitiveness that was taught
to me. Its not as bad now, but its still there. In a snow storm,
I have to get out and conquer the snow to prove that I can, she
would rather sit at home and watch it snow. Men are taught to take
risks to prove that they can, and its dangerous. I'm lucky I never
killed myself, I tried often enough.
I think that single men have a shorter life span than the others
because they are trying to impress the women, and they have a more
strenuous lifestyle. Married men have a mate and don't have to
try to impress all of the other women. I had many more 'instances'
when I was single than I have since I've been married. I was single
for 20 years and married for 14.
Spence
|
28.39 | Not | INK::BUCKLEY | | Tue Feb 03 1987 08:55 | 6 |
| Re .38:
Spence, SO refers to 'Significant Other'...another one of those
clicky DEC terms (^;
William j.
|
28.41 | Synchronous Output? | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Tue Feb 03 1987 09:21 | 9 |
| .39: "SO" isn't specific to DEC... it's in very wide general
use, and has been for quite a while.
.38: "Sexual Object", huh? Very interesting... never heard
that one before. If one person thought of that, others probably
will, as well. One more reason to avoid use of "SO", which
I was never all that crazy about to begin with! :-)
/dave
|
28.42 | | 43156::ANDY_LESLIE | Andy `{o}^{o}' Leslie, ECSSE. OSI. | Tue Feb 03 1987 10:56 | 1 |
| Going to revert to POSSLQ then?
|
28.43 | I shoulda waited 1 more day. | GENRAL::FRASHER | Master of naught | Tue Feb 03 1987 14:21 | 13 |
| Interesting. I wrote .38 yesterday. This morning, I got a letter
explaining that SO means 'significant other'. This afternoon, I
found a discussion about it in 31.54, titled (no relation, I'm sure)
"What's that around your neck"
The title refers to ties.
Apparently, 31.55, which is missing, contained something about its
possibly meaning 'sex object', so its not an uncommon mistake.
Perhaps it should be defined in note 1.
My apologies to those of you who use the term.
Spence
|
28.44 | | VAXUUM::DYER | Aiigh!!! | Tue Feb 03 1987 15:05 | 2 |
| Notes> set moderator
Notes> set conference/notice="SO = Significant Other"
|
28.45 | | RANCHO::HOLT | They always come in when I'm naked | Thu May 12 1988 21:02 | 4 |
|
But our lives are so exciting...
Becha didn't didn't know that, huh?
|
28.46 | | WLDWST::AHMAD | The One and Only | Wed Aug 24 1988 21:15 | 3 |
| If marraige, divorce or sex placed a part in the life span, all
Popes would die before they were 40.
|
28.47 | A Modest Theory | VAXWRK::CONNOR | Clean mind clean body; take your pick | Thu Aug 25 1988 11:33 | 5 |
| The King Ramses II lived to be over 90; his wife around 30.
Ramses had his own concubine set up when he was a teen.
He also fathered some 100 children.
In the modern world men are discouraged from such activity.
Just wonderering what effects these have :-).
|
28.48 | a few possible reasons... | RANCHO::HOLT | Great Caesar calls (he's such a tyrant!) | Thu Aug 25 1988 13:43 | 8 |
|
Ramses didn't have to work his ass off everyday to make his
living; he didn't go around wondering why he couldn't get a
date or why he attracted only a certain kind of woman;
He didn't have to fight Theban commute traffic for an hour
to get his chariot to the palace; He didn't have the IRS
breathing down his neck, and he didn't have women telling
him that it was all mens fault...
|
28.49 | Kicking butt helps, too... | MCIS2::HARDY | The night time is the Right time... | Sat Aug 27 1988 03:03 | 4 |
| Re: -1
You got that right, Mr. Holt, and furthermore he stayed all charged
up after the major ass-kicking he gave the Hittites at Kadesh!
|