T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
27.1 | Not very realistic. | ANT::WOLOCH | | Thu Nov 20 1986 19:57 | 9 |
| Yes Bob,
Cosmos is more than mildly derogatory. It plays up sex assuming
that all women want to constantly hop into bed with any and every
man. The magazine gives a very unrealisitic view of sex and
relationships. The magazine does indeed exploit men, although
certainly not to the extent that some "mens" magazines exploit
women. I hope your daughter is intelligent enough to sort through
all the garbage articles and NOT accept those articles as fact.
|
27.2 | huh? | GENRAL::SURVIL | Too hip to be square | Fri Nov 21 1986 11:36 | 9 |
| >Although certainly not to the extent that some "mens" magazines
exploit women..
Nancy, that to me is an unsupported statement. Please provide
facts...
Thank you,
Todd
|
27.4 | I'm sensitive about this | CEDSWS::REDDEN | De Oppresso Liber | Fri Nov 21 1986 15:33 | 16 |
| RE: < Note 27.3 -< Neo-sensitive ??? Be More "feminine" for _her_ >-
>it is a catch-phrase that applies to men who are attempting to respond
>to the new demand by women that they be more sensitive.
Dear Eagles,
Sensitive to what? I think I am more confused about the sensitive
part than the neo part. Macho men are sensitive. Is it a person's
sensitivities that define them as macho or neo-sensitive? Are there
some new things to be sensitive to that define "neo-sensitive"?
Or is "neo" a prefix like "meta" that retreads an abused word so
we can get another twenty thousand usages out of it?
Bobby
|
27.6 | think about it | CEODEV::FAULKNER | moderator | Sat Nov 22 1986 02:15 | 2 |
| yup you
|
27.8 | I only look at the pictures | CSC32::KOLBE | Liesl-Colo Spgs- DTN 522-5681 | Mon Nov 24 1986 19:20 | 13 |
| Please guys, don't assume most or any women actually think like
COSMO women. (that does NOT mean we don't like SEX & LOVE) COSMO
articles are usually trash and most folks know it.
BUT...OK, I admit it, I do ocasionally do the quizes these mags
put out. Everybody has their dark secrets. (like reading the National
Enquirer headlines)
I don't want a neo-sensitive or a neanderthal, just a decent person.
Are women really all that hard to please????? Liesl
|
27.10 | Could not have said it better | GENRAL::SURVIL | Too hip to be square | Tue Nov 25 1986 11:02 | 6 |
|
RE:.9
Well put, Steven
Todd
|
27.11 | Here we go again | MORGAN::BARBER | | Tue Nov 25 1986 13:57 | 34 |
| RE .8
> Are women all that hard to please ? <
Hummmm talk about a loaded question !!!! and I know Iam
letting my self in for trouble on this one.
Ans Yes and no, I find from my personal experence of
knowing (in various ways) different women, that their
needs are many times divirsifed and complex in compairison
to mens. In most cases these needs must be met by the man in
her life in order for her to be pleased.
The problems arise when these needs are inicially put aside
during the beginning stages of a relationship with the intent
to change the man around to meet them later. Lo and behold
they are sprung upon the man at the latter stage and when he
dosent or cant meet them its big problem time.
I could give a number of examples of this, but why take up the
space. We (both men an women) all have seen or have been a part
of it at one time or another.
Untill people learn and live two inportant phrases the problems
will continue. They are ;
1 What you see is what you get (the equivilant to Popeye's
"I ams what I ams, and thats all what I ams")
2 A friend is not a person taken in or shamed
a friend is one who knows your faults and dont give a damn.
OK its open season on me now ladies :-)
Bob B
|
27.14 | Narrow-Minded Reactionaries | VAXUUM::DYER | It's Bedtime for Bonzo | Thu Dec 11 1986 03:05 | 5 |
| I think _Cosmo_'s complaints about sensitive men are akin to the reactionary
complaints about self-assured women. If the authors of those stupid articles
don't like such people, that's their own problem. Me, I like variety; and
I applaud any trend that lets people be who they really are.
<_Jym_>
|
27.15 | | RDGE40::KERRELL | with a little bit of top and side | Mon Dec 15 1986 12:30 | 7 |
| > Me, I like variety; and
> I applaud any trend that lets people be who they really are.
Does societys freedom to be who you are encourage crime? Are there too many
pressures on people to live exceptional lives?
Dave.
|
27.16 | And the quizzes are fun ;-) | AKA::TAUBENFELD | Almighty SET | Wed Aug 12 1987 17:06 | 8 |
| I would never say that COSMO is a great mag, but it's certainly
better than Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vougue, etc. Yes, they do talk
a lot about sex, but I remember an interesting article about women
who don't like sex and why. They also paint a stronger picture
of a woman, and that there is more to a woman than worrying about
how well her eyebrows are plucked. Maybe in an effort to give the
woman more strength they have felt the need to put down men.
|
27.17 | for information purposes only | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | Leave the poor nits in peace! | Tue Aug 21 1990 15:46 | 7 |
| I know this note is old, but did want to share this.
For those readers who choose to boycott products made in South Africa,
or companies that do business with South Africa, COSMOPOLITAN has a
production office in South Africa.
E Grace
|
27.18 | Heavens! | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | someone shot our innocence | Mon Sep 10 1990 11:35 | 13 |
| SAY IT AIN'T SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
COSMO, IN SOUTH AFRICA?!?!?!?!?
but but but....what do i bring as reading material to lunch on
fridays now? what other magazines will help give me the inside
scoop on what women want, what women are looking for (and how
women plan to trap a man into marriage in 10 easy steps!)
E, you really bummed me out with this one! guess i am just
gonna have to be PI in this particular instance.
jonathan
|
27.19 | err...umm...what's PI? (Not another acronym!!) | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | Leave the poor nits in peace! | Mon Sep 10 1990 12:57 | 4 |
| Jonathan! Can You Ever Forgive Me?!?!?!?!?!? HOW INSENSITIVE OF
ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(*8
E Grace
|
27.20 | Re -1: PI :== Politically Incorrect | SSGBPM::KENAH | The color of deception... | Mon Sep 10 1990 13:14 | 0 |
27.21 | | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | someone shot our innocence | Mon Sep 10 1990 13:56 | 12 |
| re: .19.....
sure, i forgive you. i think i was becoming too PC anyways.
if it weren't for Cosmo coming out of South Africa, i probably
would have had to start clubbing baby seals to regain a sense
of balance.....
jonathan (whose norwegian uncle complains about greenpeace, as seals
now run rampant off the coast of norway, eating all the fish,
outstripping food supply, getting sick and dying as a result of
overpopulation now that major predator can no longer hunt them)
|
27.22 | hear, hear... | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | Kierkegaard was right...! | Tue Sep 11 1990 06:45 | 12 |
| jonathan,
I understand what you mean, for I'm an avid women magazine reader
myself, one requires this as a good background for easy, intranscendent
and "sensitive" chatter...though it can really affect your brain
function if you overdo it...I'll start worrying the day I try to
remember what my favourite erotic phantasy ought to be (when in bed,
alone) or when I'll try to reminiscense what the trendy erogene spots
of the months are (when in bed, not alone)...
But, as long as there is a new Shere Hite report in the brew, we've got
nothing to worry about...
...Paul
|
27.23 | a mild suggestion...:-) | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | the element of surprise | Tue Sep 11 1990 10:30 | 6 |
| re .18, .22, maybe you guys should start subscribing to Time, National
Geographic, Premiere and Rolling Stone, so you'll have something
*interesting* to talk about. :-) hee-hee-ha-ha
Lorna
|
27.24 | suggestion partially accepted... | FRAMBO::LIESENBERG | Kierkegaard was right...! | Tue Sep 11 1990 11:49 | 25 |
| re. 23
Take all the discussions about Picasso's "epoque ros�", about
Dal�'s surrealism, about the preying behaviour of Carcharodon
Carcharias, about Joyce's narrative style, about the composition of the
Haley comet, about Kant's concept of the "thing", about the
consequences of the Crimean war and the Balaclava charge on
Euro-Russian diplomatic relations, about the impact of Renacentism on
Western culture...put them all together in a pot, and I'll trade it
anytime for a conversation on "why my last boyfriend was a scoundrel"
or "why all men are egoistic and immature" or "why I get hick-up from
drinking beer", for there's where you get to know a person better, where
you'll suddenly be confronted with personal views, prejudices and
misconceptions that are much more fun to talk about, for suddenly all
the intellectual parrot-playing of what you happened to read in "Arts"
or the like won't help you!
Yes, that's when the person unmasks! God bless women mags for inspiring
us with seemingly simplistic subjects! Besides, I feel it extremely
sexistic to have "women" and "men" literature, it surely helps building
a useless bareer...
On the other side, I wouldn't recommend women to get a subscription for
"men's" magazines...God help us, it could do irreparable damage to the
picture as nice, open and intellectually-oriented individuals that
women have of us men! :-)
...Paul
|
27.25 | and the RIGHT answer is: | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | ridin' the Antelope Freeway | Tue Sep 11 1990 13:09 | 10 |
| personally I think we should trash cosmo, with its pix for men and
articles for airheads; and the wm-f-buckley-rags, with their elitist
discussions of how best to raise one's eyebrows; and
playboy-and-its-clones-and-imitators, with their, ah, scintillating pix
and their pseudo-intellectual trappings; and the tabloids, with their
mass appeals to the lead-damaged among us.
We should all limit ourselves to reading Mad Magazine, and watching
reruns of Rocky and Bullwinkle, and riding the rides on the midway at
the county fair.
|
27.26 | what are you trying to do, Lorna, put me to sleep? | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | someone shot our innocence | Tue Sep 11 1990 15:21 | 11 |
| I don't read Mad magazine anymore. Sergio Aragones has his own
comic book....Groo the Wanderer....which I follow faithfully. The
rest of the art from Mad I can live without. Well....Spy vs. Spy
was kinda funny....but I have Sergio and I am happy.
Rolling Stone? YUCK! I'll take Spin any day of the week!
but even so......i still think that Cosmo is more fun than most
other magazines put out....it even ranks up there with certain
comic books in terms of entertainment value.........
|
27.27 | I always nose when the new issue is in the office. Phew! | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Wed Sep 12 1990 01:55 | 5 |
| re.26
Provided you can stand the disgusting smell of 20 perfumes reeking from the
scrach and sniff pages therein.
-j
|
27.28 | | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | someone shot our innocence | Wed Sep 12 1990 16:17 | 12 |
| provided i can stand the smell?
but how often do i get to close my eyes, and pretend that i am
in a roomful of women? okay, i do that all the time, but how
often does one of my senses agree with my imagination?
i don't usually nose when the new issue comes in, but maybe my sense
of smell is dead from....uh....too many rock concerts? no, that is
my sense of hearing.....
whatever.
|
27.30 | There's two things that smell like fish, and one of them's fish | DOOLIN::HNELSON | Evolution in action | Wed Sep 12 1990 18:05 | 6 |
| re -1:
Please, let there be a place where we can make jokes like that one, and
this is it!? I'm cheering, mike, between chuckles.
- Hoyt
|
27.31 | | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | Leave the poor nits in peace! | Wed Sep 12 1990 18:22 | 18 |
| <<< Note 27.29 by HEYYOU::ZARLENGA "one-half of the dynamic duo" >>>
>>.28> but how often do i get to close my eyes, and pretend that i am
>>.28> in a roomful of women? okay, i do that all the time, but how
>> Got a supermarket with a fresh fish section in ya neighborhood?
>>-mike z
Uh, Mike? I don't know how to break this to you, but *fresh* fish
has no odor.
You'd better get yourself a new supermarket!
{*8
E Grace
|
27.32 | Someone check him for whisky scent! | FRAIS::LIESENBERG | Kierkegaard was right... | Thu Sep 13 1990 07:59 | 15 |
| re .29
Ouch...I always found that "joke" disgusting...
I'd have severe hygienic constraints when meeting "a room fulla" your
acquaintances, believe me. I'd review the quality of both the
supermarket and the ...ahem... "establishment" you seem to attend!
I'd trade smells between the male and the female lockerrooms in a
tennis club or the WCs in the company anytime...and I've never heard
women make jokes about the similarities between a WC obligued by men
with obviously limited aiming abilities and the wild cat section in the
zoo... :-)
...Paul
|
27.33 | MOOOO TO YOU! | CUPMK::DROWNS | this has been a recording | Thu Sep 13 1990 10:56 | 8 |
|
I find .29 rude! How come that gets to stay but the cow joke had
to go?
I'm surprised at you Mike!
bonnie
|
27.35 | cow & matador? no? | FRAIS::LIESENBERG | Take a rest, Sisyphus! | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:23 | 4 |
| re .33 + .34
Hmmm...you're sparking my interest in the cow joke...don't be cruel...
...Paul
|