T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
5718.1 | | BIGUN::nessus.cao.dec.com::Mayne | Wake up, time to die | Wed Feb 19 1997 13:22 | 4 |
| If you have a "standard" alternative account, what's the point of doing it in
the first place?
PJDM
|
5718.2 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Wed Feb 19 1997 14:08 | 18 |
| re .1: Doesn't parse...
There's no 'standard' alternative account... I thought .0 was asking
for recomendations how to do one. Though I haven't seen any
recomendations either...
>It is suggested that the name be fairly
>long and not easily guessed
So how about "Vee Vont To Pomp You Up" as the Administrator account?
;-) Oh well, it's just a bit too long (20 is the maximum).
Really, if you're really paranoid, just take something that's not
commonly used on any system for the sys$mangler, and not related in any
way to the real administrator(s). Might sprinkle in the odd Umlaut etc.
(how would you line 'j�rjestelm�nvalvoja' - I believe that's
administrator in Finnish :-)
|
5718.3 | Try $qz149bob !! | PGREEN::SACKMANJ | Pedalo'ing the Internet | Mon Mar 10 1997 00:21 | 11 |
| From a security viewpoint I have always suggested names that are very
innocent looking or very complex.
Try a username like Sue_James (who does not exist), no description
(remember that users can access the User Manager initial screen) or a
user type description ( Sue James - temp ), and a password including
shift characters.
An old username of mine from the '70s was $QZ149BOB !! Remember that no
matter how complicated a username is to type in initially, it gets much
easier with a couple of hundred logons!!!
Jon.
|