T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
116.1 | Here goes..... | GEC013::CIN020::KOOPMAN | | Wed Mar 27 1996 16:04 | 31 |
| It does sound as though your friend has taken on a boyfriend with a lot
of responsibilities; considering she has never been married and is without
childred (that's the way I read it). It would definately be 'easier' to
be involved with someone with no past obligations such as children, ex-
wives, etc., but....
I have a few questions. Does he include her in his visitations with his
children? Or haven't they gotten to that point yet? If she is welcome to
be involved with him and his children, that could be a rewarding experience
for her too -- which is only 2 days of the week -- the other 5 days or
evenings can be for the two of them to be together.
As far as the financials go, does he have to cover his daughter's car
payments and insurance, and his parents difference in mortgage? That could
be quite an annoying burden. The child support is a fact of life. You
must either accept it going in and appreciate the fact that there are
children being taken care of, or make the decision early on that this is
not the type of relationship you want to be in. I don't think you should
look badly at these circumstances, just whether or not the situation is one
you personnaly want to be in. For me, taking your parents in is a personal
decision one makes in their lifetime. I think it says alot about someone
when they are willing to take on the responsibility of their parents or
elderly care. But again, it makes it difficult for a relationship.
The plus to this is, if your friend stays involved in this...if the need
ever comes about when she wants to care for a family member, he should
accept this pretty easily.
I suppose I haven't given much clear advice. Your friend needs to weigh
the pro's and con's of being in the relationship and of not being in the
relationship, and also look at what good qualities she has that she can
bring with her to the relationship. These could be very good for his
children and parents if she chooses to stay. If she has a hard time seeing
the plus side of his circumstances, then this is probably not the one
for her.
|
116.2 | | TALLIS::NELSON | It's not the years it's the mileage! | Thu Mar 28 1996 08:38 | 34 |
|
This is probably just me, but I absolutely *hate* those hot/cold
situations. It's an emotional rollercoaster. Either the person isn't
being straight with you, or there's something going on with them
emotionally. In either case it's generally not a very good scene.
He sounds to me like he's got considerable baggage, both family
wise and emotionally. That right there is usally a warning signal to
me (the latter mostly). I give him credit for being honest about not
wanting to be committed, but this business of wanting to be with her
steadily for awhile and then nothing for awhile -- I went through
something similar a long time ago and I decided I wouldn't do it again.
The kicker for me was when he told her to shut up -- how a person
really feels about you is shown in their everyday *little* actions, I
believe -- that's why those "little" things are so important to me.
Love her? Possibly. But it seems pretty clear to me where his
priorities are (and possibly rightly so).
From what you've described, if it were me I would likely leave and
not look back. Life is *way* too short to spend it being depressed
over someone like that. My own philosophy is to give a person and
situation every possible chance -- then finally, if it really isn't
working, I can leave with a clear conscience knowing I did everything I
could.
Best of luck,
Brian
|
116.3 | let 'her' make the choice | ASDG::CALL | | Thu Mar 28 1996 09:58 | 9 |
| It's obvious that she is going into an extended family situation.
It's going to depend on the family interactions and if everyone can
learn to interact in a positive way. It takes about two years for
everyone to trust/bond. If people are willing to work it out and
communicate with one another then it really could work. Life is a risk.
Relationships are risks. It's her life and her choice because she's the
one that's going to have to live it. My suggestion to you as her friend
is to listen to her, but you're going to have to let 'her' make her own
lifes choices.
|
116.4 | Rid of... | PDMOPS::DBROWN | | Thu Mar 28 1996 13:53 | 10 |
|
I personally would leave the situation. I'm another who can't stand
the rollercoaster. Sounds to me like he's playing games. What does
he do during the lulls of their so called relationship? If she
is having a hard time dealing with this maybe she should give the
ultimatum of all or nothing, it all depends on what she wants.
My 2 cents..
|
116.5 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Here I am, my anger and me | Thu Mar 28 1996 16:01 | 21 |
|
I sounds like your friend has some significant self esteem
problems. "Love" isnt worth being at the bottom of the pile, coming in
last all the time and being the low priority interrupt. Heck, she even
lost her freedom to be vocal during sex! How many things is someone
willing to give up "in the name of Love"?
The answer to that depends a lot on how much one thinks of
themselves. I believe that someone who values their own self and thinks
highly of themselves, would not settle for such a situation. They'd be
confident that they could easily find someone who was in a position -
both situationally and emotionally - to take better care of them, to
make it seem that they were "most" important to them and be able to
treat them in such a way, that they would feel was more along the lines
of their own self value.
I know your friend, deep down, thinks more of herself that what
she's getting out of this. Otherwise she wouldnt be in pain about it.
She's just afraid...
Joe
|
116.6 | | STOSS1::nqsrv522.nqo.dec.com::FARLOW | | Thu Mar 28 1996 18:11 | 1 |
| Dump him.
|
116.7 | not for me | TARKIN::BREWER | | Mon Apr 01 1996 14:36 | 6 |
|
On his priority list, she seems to be way down there.
I couldn't live with that. I need to be near the top.
So, I wouldn't stay with him. If she can live with being
somewhere after mom,dad,kids,EXs,jobs...well, god bless `er.
|
116.8 | Run while you can | BLAZER::MIKELIS | Software Partner's Group, MR01-2/L2 | Wed Apr 03 1996 12:11 | 10 |
| Whenever i hear someone say up front that they aren't ready to be
committed, that's a tip off that they really aren't ready for any
relationship. I feel sad for your friend and would strongly suggest that
she break the ties and move on. Why should she have to settle for someone
with so much baggage and who "isn't ready" to be committed? I've seen it a
thousand times before. She should look at the trail he's left behind and
read the writing on the wall. Life is too short to waste on someone who
won't be there for you.
/james
|
116.9 | Run and keep on running | GRANPA::DVISTICA | | Mon Apr 15 1996 16:19 | 5 |
| If this were me, I'd run and never look back. Your friend seems to
be way down on the list of this man's priorities. It sounds as if
everything is on his terms only. Life is definitely too short for
settling for this type of relationship.
|