T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
97.1 | | LONDON::BRIDGE | is falling down | Fri Jun 23 1995 15:37 | 7 |
|
I feel if you're going to have any kind of an affair... Either fix your
marriage or GET OUT OF THE MARRIAGE!
John
|
97.2 | | ASDG::CALL | | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:29 | 27 |
| Yes you should probably get out of the marriage. It's not fair to your
wife or you or your lover. You should probably take the time to end
your marriage before getting in any deeper with your other emotional
commitment. It will be easier on your children in the long run.
Your children will be very unhappy with this turn of events.
Although it can't be very pleasant for them with the way things are
right now.
Try to find a balance where they can still have a firm foundation to
start lives of their own.
You will probably go through an emotional upset just leaving the
marital home.
There is no sense in being as unhappy in your marriage as you are.
You should probably have ended it before you started your affair.
At least this way you wife will have a chance to find some happiness
also.
The stress will be intense. Especially as losses are incurred on all
sides.
|
97.3 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Mon Jun 26 1995 11:38 | 8 |
|
You've made it clear in .0 that you currently feel the marriage is in shambles.
But what's happening in that other relationship ? Are you two still in love?
Are you feeling a committment to each other for the future ? That
part wasn't clear to me from reading your note.
/Eric
|
97.4 | Anonymous reply | QUARK::MODERATOR | | Mon Jun 26 1995 17:09 | 29 |
| The following entry has been contributed by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by
mail, please send your message to QUARK::MODERATOR, specifying the
conference name and note number. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Steve
I can tell you from personal experience, that what you are doing to
your wife and children (if you have children) is probably the worse
thing you can do to any human being. It is worse than losing a loved
one by death. I will NEVER trust my husband again, because when he
had the chance, he messed up and I found him with his girlfriend in a
parked car. Now, mind you, he told me it was over and he was willing
to work this out with me. He too, got emotionally involved with this
girl. And now, he can't end it with her, so I have asked him to end
it with me so that I can get on with my life. There was no excuse for
this "affair". Our marriage had no real problems. We had our little
arguments, but we worked them out. That is what really bothers me. I
did nothing wrong, and look what happened. We got along great and I
never would have thought he would need to go elsewhere, but he did and
he has destroyed our marriage and family. You certainly hit the nail on
the head with your tapestry example.
|
97.5 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Mon Jun 26 1995 18:58 | 8 |
|
To the anon replier:
You say there was nothing wrong with your marriage and your husband
got involved with another woman. I don't get it. It can't be both.
Which was it ?
/Eric
|
97.6 | | TALLIS::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Mon Jun 26 1995 19:14 | 17 |
| >To the anon replier:
> You say there was nothing wrong with your marriage and your husband
> got involved with another woman. I don't get it. It can't be both.
> Which was it ?
From her perspective, there might not have been anything wrong.
She may very well have done everything she could but the other person
still chose to cheat. You can't force loyalty from someone. Perhaps
her husband has unresolved issues or perhaps he just isn't the faithful
type. I personally don't see a conflict in her statements.
Brian
|
97.7 | | TALLIS::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Mon Jun 26 1995 19:17 | 19 |
|
Re: .0
> Right now, my marriage is a shambles. Home life is a disaster. I find
> that my relationship with my wife has changed so much, that there's
> simply not much left (not that there was a strong foundation before,
> though). And, yet each time we get up to that precipice which involves
> a divorce, I cringe at what lays beneath me.
Why? Answering why you cringe at the thought of the divorce may
help you leave -- or stay.
Brian
|
97.8 | | 43GMC::KEITH | Dr. Deuce | Tue Jun 27 1995 07:34 | 11 |
| Dear Anon:
The only person who can make you happy is yourself. You must do what
you think is right.
Someone once said that a successful live would be one where at the end
you looked back and had no regrets. Will you regret that you wasted you
life in a bad marriage? Will you regret that you never took the chance
for happiness?
Steve
|
97.9 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Tue Jun 27 1995 10:41 | 12 |
|
If one partner of a marriage goes off and has an affair, then something
was *already* amiss in the marriage, and there was already uncommunicated
issues.
There's no such thing as people merely being "unfaithful" in a marriage
that's "working". People have affairs to escape from dealing with trouble
that's *already* there. People have affairs, or fantasize about such, to
soothe the pain that they feel.
/Eric
|
97.10 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Jun 27 1995 11:21 | 27 |
|
I agree with Eric that if one partner has unfulfilled needs that
can only be filled by a romantic liason, then something is wrong
with the marriage/relationship. A relationship is a TWO-party
deal, both sides have to be satisfied to be successful.
If partner A thinks nothing is wrong while partner B is having
an affair, it may be explained by any/some/all of the following
reasons (of course, there may many more)
- the 2 partners are not communicating successfully, thus
partner A does not realized how unhappy partner B is.
- partner B is dishonest, does not want partner A to know
about the fling.
- partner A does not want to know about it, hoping that it
will go away.
So, in any of the cases, there is a problem already. Just because
partner A is happy does not mean that partner B *SHOULD* also be
happy. This is the assumption by the anon that is being questioned
by Eric.
Eva
|
97.11 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Jun 27 1995 11:36 | 15 |
|
I also think that sometimes marriage is viewed as a duty
like a job. If the husband does the husband-duty and the
wife does the wife-duty, then everything should be fine.
It would have been fine in another time or another place
when or where the expectation of marriage was different.
But here, the expectation has changed from the traditional
husband-provide-wife-keep-house to husband-wife-should-be-
best-friends-and-everything-else-is-secondary. If both
sides do not have the same expectation, then we have problems.
Eva
|
97.12 | | TALLIS::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:04 | 39 |
|
>There's no such thing as people merely being "unfaithful" in a marriage
>that's "working". People have affairs to escape from dealing with trouble
>that's *already* there. People have affairs, or fantasize about such, to
>soothe the pain that they feel.
I didn't say the marriage was working. I was merely stating that
it is entirely possible for one person in a relationship to be doing
everything right, everything they can (this does not suppose they are
perfect however) and still the other person could cheat. The other
person's desire to cheat may have *NOTHING* to do with their partner,
it could very well be (most likely IS) some issue within themselves.
How convenient that you and Eva have worked out all the possible
explanations for why people have affairs. Sorry to say but I have to
disagree with both of you and say there are more possibilities which
you're not taking into account. I don't have stats in front of me, but
I know I've heard of cases of folks (probably a pretty hefty percentage
of folks who cheat) who cheat on one partner, and then another, and
then another, and so on.... Does this have anything to do with their
partners? Gimme a break! It's an issue within the person themselves
that they need to work on before they can be faithful to *any* partner.
I would agree that in a lot of cases if someone is cheating both
people share some amount of the responsibility. However I wouldn't
jump to that conclusion before I know the facts.
I'm not making comments about particular scenarios here in these
notes, merely stating that the possibility exists and therefore it's
unfair to be judging someone guilty before you even know the details.
Brian
|
97.13 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Your mind is in here and mine is also | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:35 | 19 |
|
Brian is correct, because there is the phenomena known as "sex and
love addiction". Someone could be in a relationship or marriage with
the best partner in the whole world - and still, they must "act out"
their affliction. One way this is done is by engaging in sex outside of
the primary relationship.
This behavior has little to do with the partner as a person, or their
performance - in any category. It has only to do with the person who is
an addict. It's the as-yet untreated part of _them_ manefesting itself.
>People have affairs, or fantasize about such, to soothe the pain that
>they feel.
The hallmark of a sex addict, or any other addict you care to
consider, if you substitute the appropriate behavior for "have
affairs". It's how you turn mere pain into true suffering.
Joe
|
97.14 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:52 | 26 |
|
Brian,
Before you go off the my deep end, please re-read my entry.
In specific in .10:
>If partner A thinks nothing is wrong while partner B is having
>an affair, it may be explained by any/some/all of the following
>reasons (of course, there may many more)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is your comprehension of what I wrote:
>How convenient that you and Eva have worked out all the possible
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>explanations for why people have affairs.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Sorry to say but I have to disagree with both of you and say there
>are more possibilities which you're not taking into account.
I can see why!
Eva
|
97.15 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:04 | 8 |
|
Eva, thanks for taking the time to respond to Brian.
I also saw how he was not thoroughly reading what we wrote before he
answered, but I didn't have the energy to talk back.
/Eric
|
97.16 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:09 | 22 |
|
Joe,
>Someone could be in a relationship or marriage with the best partner
>in the whole world - and still, they must "act out" their affliction.
But there is no such thing as the best partner in the whole world,
just like there is no such thing as the best daughter or the best
mother. IMO, people get into relationship with partners who are compatible,
whatever that means.
Yes, there are people who are not cut out, for whatever reason, for
monogomous relationships and you can call them whatever term. But,
these people have to be honest (my reason #2) about their priorities
and preferences in life AND communiciate that to their partner (my
reason #1). And, people have to more informed and less naive when they
look for a partner, IMO. In general, people do not change overnight,
unless there is a trauma, people have track records and telltale signs.
People have to take responsiblity in their choices of partners, IMO.
Eva
|
97.17 | | TALLIS::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Thu Jun 29 1995 09:37 | 28 |
|
Deep end? Not a chance. Believe me, you'll know when I go "off
the deep end". ;-)
Okay, I missed a parenthetical expression -- things are hectic here
and I was going by tone rather than chewing over each word. Overall
I'd say that's a minor nit and my major point still stands.
> But there is no such thing as the best partner in the whole world,
> just like there is no such thing as the best daughter or the best
> mother. IMO, people get into relationship with partners who are compatible,
> whatever that means.
People get into relationships, IMO, for even more reasons than they
have affairs. If people only got into relationships with folks who
were compatible, or who they *thought* were compatible, a lot of
problems would go away. If you've got unresolved issues, chances are
your choices are driven by them rather than compatibility or something
else which we generally consider "healthy".
Brian
|
97.18 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Thu Jun 29 1995 10:03 | 17 |
|
Brian,
Every single one of us have unresolved issues, until the day we
die, IMO. The only thing we can ever hope for and work towards is
knowing what those issues may be and be honest about them.
The one thing that *I* think dysfunctional upbringing
didn't teach is to accept, *NOT* saying condone here, human weaknesses
of various kind as part of life. The search for a "healthy" human
being for partner is like the search for unicorn, IMO. A compatible
partner, to me, is someone who appreciates our strengths, can live
with our weaknesses and hopefully helps to balance the scale out.
Eva
|
97.19 | | TALLIS::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Fri Jun 30 1995 10:09 | 45 |
|
Eva,
> Every single one of us have unresolved issues, until the day we
> die, IMO. The only thing we can ever hope for and work towards is
> knowing what those issues may be and be honest about them.
This is true, to a degree. We will never attain perfection, we
will never be completely free of issues. However, this doesn't mean we
shouldn't *try* to continue to work to eliminate them, and at least
ameliorate them. I don't think it's good enough to have issues,
recognize them and inform others about them and then say you're done
with it. "I'm an abuser of others, I recognize that and just wanted to
let you know how I am but don't expect me to change" is not acceptable.
For me, anyway.
There's a big difference between someone who has issues but has
worked to make them a smaller part of their life and someone who
hasn't. That's the key here -- do your issues rule your life?
> The one thing that *I* think dysfunctional upbringing
> didn't teach is to accept, *NOT* saying condone here, human weaknesses
> of various kind as part of life. The search for a "healthy" human
> being for partner is like the search for unicorn, IMO. A compatible
> partner, to me, is someone who appreciates our strengths, can live
> with our weaknesses and hopefully helps to balance the scale out.
There's a big difference, again for me, between human weakness and
having major unresolved issues. Sure, we all make mistakes and fall
down -- but do we hurt others in the process? Do we make attempts to
learn from our mistakes? Healthy is a very relative thing. While no
one is *perfectly* healthy, there are people who are "healthy enough"
to make us happy. Depending on our experiences and own level of
health, the term "healthy enough" is a relative thing and will be
different for each of us.
Brian
|
97.20 | | 3D::MACKAY_E | | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:00 | 28 |
|
Brian,
People, whom we can't stand, for whatever reason, we leave
them alone. People, whom we don't agree with, for whatever reason,
we leave them alone. People come in all shades. Someone's garbage
is another person's treasure. IMO, we cannot expect people to change
for us, we cannot expect people to be "healthy enough to make us happy".
IMO, there are always going to be heart breakers, if one does not
want to get hurt, get out of the way. We are not in a store buying
a roll of paper towel, of which we have a certain set of standard
expectations. We are like tiny pieces of jigsaw puzzle in a bucket,
where a few of the other pieces may fit with us. We could try every
piece that comes along, getting our own edges frayed trying to fit,
or we could have a mentally picture of what might be a good fit and
only entertain the pieces that look like 99% match. Maybe there is
no match in the bucket. We can try to cut up other pieces to fit
our shape, but then those pieces may not be happy. We are not
passive, waiting for other pieces to cut us up or forces their
edges on us. We are not helpless. We don't sit there and let people
do things to us. It is just as dynsfunctional or naive to expect
people to take care of our needs and watch out for us.
All IMO ...
Eva
|
97.21 | | DKAS::GALLUP | You are what you think. | Fri Jun 30 1995 17:04 | 60 |
|
>>>>More likely is an eating away at the foundation of the marriage, shaky
>>>>though it may already be.
I find one of the most common elements behind unhappy marriages is
when couples marry "for love."
Love is not stable foundation on which to build a marriage, because
love comes and goes throughout our lifetimes. Marriage is a commitment
to build a stable foundation for the future, for children, for the
world.
I wise man once told me "never marry someone until you've fallen out
of love with them. Because, only then, can you REALLY see that person
for who they are and what qualities and values they bring to the
relationship and to the world. Then, and only then, should you decide
if you can maintain a solid foundation with this person forever."
The foundation for marriage should be common values, goals and ideals.
Marriages should be build on friendship and healthy communication.
Because, only by having these qualities in common can you hope to
last through the times when one or both of you "fall out of love" with
each other.
I see people every day jumping into relationships and marriages because
being with the other person makes them "feel good." Being with
someone because they make you feel good, or because there's a great
sexual attraction is not going to last.
Way too often we try to fake intimacy in our relationships because
"we don't want to be alone anymore" so we lie to ourselves that this
square peg is going to fit into this round hole. So we marry the
person, and then we wake up and we find out all those things about
the other person that we can't compromise in a relationship. So we
look elsewhere for those things -- and perhaps we find them -- and
we have an affair.
All I can say to the basenote author is wake up and take responsibility
for your life. Right now you're in the middle of experiencing the cost
for your not being totally clear when you chose to marry your wife in
the first place. Or perhaps you're "forgotten" why you married her?
Either way, you're running and hiding from your responsibility to the
choices you've made.
Affairs happen when people figure out their mistakes then want to run
and hide from them. Shirking responsibility serves no one.....and
most of all, it doesn't serve ourselves. We're on this earth to
LEARN the lessons that are brought to us.
If we choose to run and hide from these lessons instead of facing them
and learning from them, they WILL come back to haunt us again and again
(and harder and harder) until we take responsibility to face them and
move through them.
And almost without fail, the quality of what we receive after we
stand up and face our responsibility far outweighs anything we can
experience by hiding from it.
Kath
|
97.22 | is it opportunity? | CHEFS::CARTERC | | Wed Jul 05 1995 05:01 | 31 |
| I heard a statistic on the radio yesterday that suggested over the
course of a marriage 1/2 men have affairs and 1/3 women have affairs...
Perhaps if this is correct then what leads to affairs is nothing more
than opportunity, cos I find it hard to believe that 33% or more
marriages are that bad....
Whilst I don't think you need to be joined to your partner by the hip,
I do think that you should try not to be put in situations where
temptation might be...
For example, I disagree very strongly with companies who hold 'company'
functions where partners cannot attend. At this sort of thing people
are likely to drink too much, people who work together can have very
close ties and all it needs is a minor indiscretion to open up the
possibility of an affair... my beliefs come mainly from observation of
Digital functions. When I first joined Digital (10 yrs ago) I was
gobsmacked to find that the Valentines Disco was employee only!
My boyfriends company is holding a Barn Dance for company employees
only... now I understand a company squash league or sporting event -
but a DANCE??
Any comments?
Xtine
|
97.23 | Okay, I'll give it another try | TALLIS::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Wed Jul 05 1995 10:47 | 64 |
|
Eva,
> People, whom we can't stand, for whatever reason, we leave
> them alone. People, whom we don't agree with, for whatever reason,
> we leave them alone. People come in all shades. Someone's garbage
> is another person's treasure. IMO, we cannot expect people to change
> for us, we cannot expect people to be "healthy enough to make us happy".
> IMO, there are always going to be heart breakers, if one does not
> want to get hurt, get out of the way. We are not in a store buying
> a roll of paper towel, of which we have a certain set of standard
> expectations. We are like tiny pieces of jigsaw puzzle in a bucket,
> where a few of the other pieces may fit with us. We could try every
> piece that comes along, getting our own edges frayed trying to fit,
> or we could have a mentally picture of what might be a good fit and
> only entertain the pieces that look like 99% match. Maybe there is
> no match in the bucket. We can try to cut up other pieces to fit
> our shape, but then those pieces may not be happy. We are not
> passive, waiting for other pieces to cut us up or forces their
> edges on us. We are not helpless. We don't sit there and let people
> do things to us. It is just as dynsfunctional or naive to expect
> people to take care of our needs and watch out for us.
That was poorly worded on my part. Rather than, "healthy enough to
make us happy", I should have said, "healthy enough to not make us
unhappy". When we enter into a relationship we should already be happy
with ourselves and not depend on someone else to do that for us. By
the same token however if someone substantially and continually
decreases our happiness then that is also something to look at and
think over.
I didn't say anything about changing others, I just think that if
someone has a history of hurting others due to unresolved issues they
are not a good candidate for a (healthy) relationship. Since none of
us are born perfect, it's a given then that each of us have work to do.
Ideally, each of us is working on our own sets of things before we even
meet potential partners.
As for pain, there is a big difference between taking a chance on
someone and not having it work out as opposed to getting involved with
someone who has a history of hurting others in relationships. These
types are not always easy to spot, but I've noticed there are generally
warning signals that are there if you're open to them.
I've noticed Eva that your basic theme is that people are imperfect
and we should take them as they are. I don't disagree with you one
iota. You *have* to take them as they are because you *can't* change
them -- we are the only ones who can effect change in our own lives.
I'm simply saying it's only smart to be careful about what types of
folks you take your chances on -- unless you enjoy or don't mind
getting hurt a lot. Needless pain is foolish. I've been hurt many
times and expect it will happen again; this does not scare me a bit.
It's the price I expect to pay occasionally for taking risks. And make
no mistake: taking risks is a part of relationships.
Brian
|
97.24 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Jul 05 1995 12:34 | 17 |
|
Brian,
I agree with what you said in .23.
I was pointing out that we should learn to take care of
ourselves, learn to figure out what we want from life and from a
partner, learn how to say no and when to go. We learn from success
and failures. The main point though is - we are in charge, we don't
wait for the other partner to make things better or make things worse,
to manage our life, like Prince Charming and Cinderella.
Eva
|
97.25 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Jul 05 1995 13:23 | 19 |
|
Kath,
>I find one of the most common elements behind unhappy marriages is
>when couples marry "for love."
This is an interesting observation. I asked a childhood friend of
mine recently how and why she picked her husband. I was surprised when
she said "Well, there are certain areas in life that I am not good at,
so I look for someone who does well in those areas. As long as he and his
family checks out fine (no abuse), and he is not a dweeb ...". It
dawned on me that she followed the traditional true blue route and made
out very well. While stupid me went out looking for true love, thinking
that I didn't need anyone for anything! If I could do it all over
again, I would still run out looking for true love, but with a better
idea what is important.
Eva
|
97.26 | | DKAS::GALLUP | You are what you think. | Wed Jul 05 1995 14:36 | 26 |
|
>> It dawned on me that she followed the traditional true blue route
>> and made out very well.
Well, there's probably a reason it's worked for thousands of years.
And it just might be an indicator as to why there's so much divorce,
depression, therapy, self-help books, etc, etc, etc.
Marrying someone because of "true love" is sort of like hiring someone
to be the vice-president of your company based on the fact that he
makes you smile. He may be great to be around, but can he really
"do the job?"
Would you hire him because you like his tie, or because he has the
qualifications, you've interviewed him, you share common philosophies
about running the company, you have common beliefs in management
style, his dedication to the employee mirrors your own....(and you
like his tie)?
Kath
|
97.27 | hindsight 20/20 | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Jul 05 1995 15:41 | 17 |
|
Kath,
Well, in my case, I was extremely fortunate to have fallen in
love with someone who can also do the job, but it was "I like your tie
and we'll figure it out as we go along", it was very much like I just
knew he was the guy, it just took a long time (years) to sort out what
was real and what wasn't, what worked and what didn't. All this work
could have been done upfront and that would have saved us a lot of
grief. One thing that kept us together thru the pits (and there were
pits) was that we knew we love each other very much and that we both
tried our damn best to make it work. We took the long hard way, learnt
a wicked lot, but should have been a lot easier though ;-)
Eva
|
97.28 | Reply from anonymous author of base note | QUARK::MODERATOR | | Thu Jul 06 1995 14:33 | 99 |
| Since a couple of you asked for an update, here it is.
My marriage is still in major disrepair. I told my wife that I was moving
out, but I haven't done anything formal towards that end result.
I saw my friend over the weekend. I still simply love being with her.
But, there were clouds on the horizon. I did a couple of things that
annoyed her (she's lived alone for 15 years, so she's very protective of
her own "space"). I left the toilet seat up, I used the wrong towel, and
a couple of other minor things. She politely told me that it ticked her
off, but she was annoyed for a couple of hours after that. She also said
that it made her think that maybe I was simply "too annoying" to have a
long term relationship with. When we first had this discussion, I almost
felt better, because then it became more clear to me that maybe, just maybe,
this wasn't going to work. But, then as our time together continued,
we got along fine, and I really enjoyed being with her. Although I would
be disappointed, I actually wouldn't mind too much if I discovered that
we were simply incompatible. What is the most painful, is the feeling
that we WOULD make a really good couple, and that it's an opportunity that I
can't pass up.
every time I see her for more than a day, when I have to leave her I really
ache for her. It's like my heart is hurting just being away from her.
I know that sounds both corny and superficial, but it's a feeling that I
simply haven't felt for SO long.
I'm reading a book now called "how to deal with your husband's mid-life
crisis" (my wife's mother gave it to her). As I read it last night,
the tears were streaming down my face. The book talked about the feelings
that other men had talked about, and I could relate to many of them.
The book also talked about how a mid-life crisis is very common for most men
around my age. I feel like maybe I'm going through
more than just a marital crisis, although that is clearly the major issue.
As an example, I am about to resign from Digital, because I want to make
a change. I don't think that I'm doing anything rash, but I do feel like
my career and my home life are simply crushing me in a vice of stress.
(granted, brought on to a large extent by myself)
I think that I feel so starved for good feelings, and frankly love, that
I have become "needy" in terms of affection. I always thought that
I was the unaffectionate type who didn't need hugs and stuff, but when
I hug my friend, it simply feels wonderful. I want to just squeeze
her hard, because it feels so nice to be close to someone like that.
This will be a slight exagerration, but I feel beaten down over the years
of arguments and lack of closeness. I contributed equally to this situation
in my own way, but nonetheless I just feel like any feelings of self-worth
that I have must be generated completely internally. That is, the relationship
doesn't make me feel good....I try to feel good about myself despite the
relationship. My wife, by the way, would say the exact same thing about
herself. (yes, I know that one can't rely on other people to generate
good feelins about oneself, but I would hope that a relationship would
contribute towards one's feelings of worth, not detract from it)
here's an excerpt from one of the replies. I don't understand what you
are really saying. By "take responsibility", you mean "make the marriage
work", or "get out of it", or what?
All I can say to the basenote author is wake up and take responsibility
for your life. Right now you're in the middle of experiencing the cost
for your not being totally clear when you chose to marry your wife in
the first place. Or perhaps you're "forgotten" why you married her?
Either way, you're running and hiding from your responsibility to the
choices you've made.
If we choose to run and hide from these lessons instead of facing them
and learning from them, they WILL come back to haunt us again and again
(and harder and harder) until we take responsibility to face them and
move through them.
Eva, from your reply:
One thing that kept us together thru the pits (and there were
pits) was that we knew we love each other very much and that we both
tried our damn best to make it work. We took the long hard way, learnt
a wicked lot, but should have been a lot easier though ;-)
I admire your tenacity in fighting through these problems. But, you had
the strong advantage of "loving each other very much". My marriage
counselor says that any marriage is like building a statue. You have
to have a basic, firm foundation of trust/affection/respec/etc, in order
to create something on top of it. As he says, "you simply don't have that
in your marriage right now".
You probably have some unwritten rules in your relationship about what
simply is unacceptable. For example, it might be "no hitting, no verbal
attacks, no attacks on family, no mocking the other person, etc, etc"
Even if you don't have these spelled out explicitly, you certainly have
them in common with your husband. What would you do if he violated one
of these tenets? The pain of what is said or done, is not anywhere near
as great as the pain of knowing that your partner would DO one of these
things (and yes, this goes for my affair, as well as my wife's verbal
attacks).
Again, I admire your stubborness to make it work. It just seems clear
that you have that firm foundation on which to build a statue.
For some of us, the foundation is not as firm.
|
97.29 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Thu Jul 06 1995 16:41 | 37 |
|
re .28
I hope you will find your path in the maze. If you need a
change, try a new hobby, something that allows you time alone
to think about things. The answer is not from therapists, but
from within you, from your soul and your consciense. Don't let
anyone else decide for you and don't let statistics sway you.
You are unique and no professional can go inside your soul and
tell you what to do. Maybe there isn't a foundation for real
OR maybe the pro just gave up on you - not knowing how to fix
it - the pro didn't have much to lose in any ways. Just be
careful, you don't want to be another statistics and you have
everything to lose.
Something I found helpful - ask yourself what kind of a person
you think you are, what kind of a person you want to be, what kind
of person you want your children to have for a father, what values
are important to you (don't listen to other people - they don't have to
pay your mortgage nor raise your kids), what will be your regrets,
what kind of mistakes will haunt you for life, something along that
line. Once you figure out what sort of a man you want to go down as,
you may have a better picture of the situation.
For me, the only rule, which is spelled out at time zero,
is if my husband was sleeping with another woman (affair, one night
stand, etc) then he and this woman would be dead, so to speak,
everything else (verbal attacks, mocking, etc) is a level playing
field. Of course, I had a good idea what kind of a person my husband
was before I got involved, ie. I knew he would not hurt me physically
on purpose, he was a respectable, good hearted man and he would not go
out on me. Now, I am not sure if I could say that about myself ;-).
Eva
|
97.30 | | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Fri Jul 07 1995 17:17 | 16 |
|
Being "ticked off" by someone leaving the toilet seat up, or using the
wrong towel, is not "clouds on the horizon", and doesn't suggest the
relationship is wrong.
It's *healthy* and *necessary* for each person in a relationship to get
occasionally ticked off by the other person and to be able to *say* what's
ticking them off, rather than hiding it inside.
So I'd say, welcome her communication that you ticked her off, as a healthy
communication in the relationship, not "clouds on the horizon".
The only cloud is the pink one in which one thinks good relationships
are without ticking each other off occasionally.
/Eric
|
97.31 | | TALLIS::NELSON | It's not the years, it's the mileage! | Wed Jul 12 1995 11:39 | 24 |
|
> Well, in my case, I was extremely fortunate to have fallen in
> love with someone who can also do the job, but it was "I like your tie
> and we'll figure it out as we go along", it was very much like I just
> knew he was the guy, it just took a long time (years) to sort out what
> was real and what wasn't, what worked and what didn't. All this work
> could have been done upfront and that would have saved us a lot of
> grief. One thing that kept us together thru the pits (and there were
> pits) was that we knew we love each other very much and that we both
> tried our damn best to make it work. We took the long hard way, learnt
> a wicked lot, but should have been a lot easier though ;-)
You know, this may sound crazy but I'd think twice about wishing
things "had been easier". The very fact that you've come through the
crucible has molded your relationship into what it is -- what sounds to
be a very strong entity. If you hadn't been through this fire, I'm
sure it would be a very different relationship. Although I'm sure at
the time you'd have given anything to make it easier. ;-)
Brian
|
97.32 | Never loose the sparks | SHRCTR::SIGEL | Takin' care of business and workin' overtime | Thu Jul 13 1995 12:02 | 9 |
| How to make a marriage work, be best freinds with your spouse, never
stop laughing, communicating, sharing common interests. Get your own
interests and hobbies that you enjoy the most. Never stop going out to
dinner, movies, beaches, trips etc. Dont get in a rut so your marriage
appears to be a 'duty'. Most of all never loose the spark that
attracted you to your spouse in the first place.
Lynne :-)
|
97.33 | some reading references | TNPUBS::PAINTER | Planet Crayon | Wed Jul 19 1995 18:08 | 24 |
|
Hi - I'm new here. (;^) However I know many of you from other places.
If you think you are going through 'mid-life crisis', there is a very
good book you might read entitled "Liquid Light Of Sex", by Barbara
Hand Clow. 'Mid-life crisis' is a very real astrological even that
happens in all our lives around age 40 or so, and it's called your
Uranus Opposition. Barbara goes into quite a bit of detail throughout
the book talking about many cases of both individuals and couples who
are experiencing this event, and given that I saw a lot of other
astrological events described that fit my own life - and the lives of
many of my friends - to a T (so much so that it was scary), I hold her
work in very high regard.
To determine your key astrological life passages, Barbara has put
several tables in the back of the book that are very easy for the
novice to use...just look up your birth month and year, and the ranges
are all calculated and presented.
One other book that is a gem in terms of talking about relationships
is, "Gift By The Sea", by Anne Morrow Lindbergh. She wrote it 30+
years ago now, and yet it is beautiful and very timeless work.
Cindy
|