T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
91.1 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon Apr 24 1995 16:42 | 30 |
|
- One thing to keep in mind is that friendships do evolve
over time when new people enter our lives. Friendships
cannot be the same all the time. Friendships that can
waether thin and thick is the most endearing.
- Second thing to keep in mind is that people go thru different
stages in lives in which they have different priorities and
responsibilities. We can only spread ourselves so thin.
- Try to involve your friend's partner, like invite him along to
whatever events. Bring your partner along, if you have one,
to help ease the jealousy part. Basically, you want to show
your friend's partner that you are a friend and you want to be
his friend too and not his competitor.
- It is not a matter of letting go, it is a matter of caring. Since
you know your friend gets a "beating" after he contacts you, what
is the point of causing him more pain? As a friend, you could
support him and show him your understanding of the situation.
You could state that you'll be there when he needs you. Life is
strange, you'll never know how long his partner will be there!
- You can not see a friend for 10 years and resume the friendship
instantly. People's circumstances change, their looks change,
but their hearts reamin the same.
Eva
|
91.2 | It's not a simple friendship by any means! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:14 | 36 |
|
Thanks heaps!...thats a great way of looking at it..However,
- Try to involve your friend's partner, like invite him along to
whatever events. Bring your partner along, if you have one,
to help ease the jealousy part. Basically, you want to show
your friend's partner that you are a friend and you want to be
his friend too and not his competitor.
I don't have any interest in his partner as a friend or any way at all. He
has caused conflict in the friendship and made me feel like the
"baddie", accusing me of trying to break them up, when all I wanted was
to see my friend every now and again for lunch or coffee. His partner
has no desire to become friendly with me either. He does not comprehend
male/female friendships at all.
I have tried to let it go, and I have accepted the change in our
friendship, but I get angry sometimes at not being able to share things
with someone who has been a major part of my life. I had not seen him
for 6 months until recently, and when I did see him, he had changed a
lot...I felt angry that I had missed out on so much.
I wonder if the friendship is going to survive the anger I feel inside,
and the 'bad mouthing' of me that comes from his partner. I feel a
little helpless, because I can't even contact him to ask him for a
coffee, because according to his partner, it is a plot to steal him
away. I can't understand this kind of jealousy.
Currently, I am walking away, as I can't see the point (as you said) in
causing him pain...He'll only resent me in the future...I only wish I
didn't have to.
Thanks again...You replied very quickly!!
|
91.3 | Gender-bias? | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Mon Apr 24 1995 18:07 | 11 |
|
I don't understand his partner being jealous if your female( no
offense) intended, he sounds like he must have a problem with any
gender? Lay it on the line with this turkey. When you love anyone
you have to give them room (I know that sounds so cliche'... but)
good luck!
|
91.4 | Fear I think! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Tue Apr 25 1995 06:39 | 4 |
|
Well, at one stage it was a bit more than a friendship....But it's not
like that anymore. :-)
|
91.5 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Your mind is in here and mine is also | Tue Apr 25 1995 10:49 | 16 |
|
IMHO, it's not your problem; it's not your difficulty - it's his!
He's the one being presented with all the flak - let him deal with it
in whatever way he needs to. All you need to to is *accept* the
outcome of his choice and strategy.
I mean of course you may tell him how you feel if the outcome is
not to your liking. But to go in and muck around with what's happening
between them two is...overstepping your friend's boundaries. He needs
to find his own truth in this matter. Perhaps that lesson will include
losing you; perhaps he needs to feel that pain in order to recognize
that what he's being presented with is just such a bunch of sh*t - and
he deserves better from someone.
Joe
|
91.6 | It's my problem if I feel the loss | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Tue Apr 25 1995 11:57 | 11 |
|
I think I would feel the pain at the loss of the friendship...He had
made his choices, and I did let him know I could not accept his
decision based on the reasons behind it (jealousy).When presented with
my opinion, he changed his decision. I'm not so much mucking around with
whats between them, far from it, I just want to keep in contact with my
friend, without feeling guilty about what his boyfriend may feel.
I don't understand myself how someone can put up with such strong
jealousy from someone who is claiming to love them!
|
91.7 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Apr 25 1995 12:46 | 21 |
|
>I don't understand myself how someone can put up with such strong
>jealousy from someone who is claiming to love them!
There are all sorts of people in the world, some we understand and
some we don't, we can't change it, we can only accept it.
Put yourself in the boyfriend's shoes. He probably knows that you
don't like him. He probably knows that you had great influences
on your friend. He probably is not secure about the relationship.
He probably doesn't have a good understanding about relationships.
He probably thinks that you are telling your friend your opinion
of him. So, if you add all those things up, the boyfriend may have
a case against you, right or wrong.
It is hurtful to you that your friend had to chose between your
friendship and his relationship. Stupid as it seems, it happens
rather often.
Eva
|
91.8 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Apr 25 1995 14:04 | 22 |
| This is a very difficult situation (I know, I've been there). What I
think I would do, hindsight being 20/20 and all :-} is to write my
friend a letter (to his *work* address, or anywhere you know it won't
be intercepted by his partner). The letter would explain how much I
wanted the friendship to continue, but it would also state that I was
unwilling to a) be treated like dirt by the partner and b) be the
excuse that "caused" any pain/abuse to my friend at the hands of the
partner. I would remind him that he (the friend) can only be
manipulated if he allows himself to be manipulated, and I would express
alarm at the amount of control this freak--er, partner seems to need in
a relationship. I would advise the friend to RUN away from this
relationship.
Then I would keep my word by keeping OUT of it entirely. And I don't
think it would be a long wait before the relationship self-destructs.
If your friendship was truly strong in the first place, it can be
rebuilt (into a true fine friendship-love, believe me). If not, well,
you'll have a lot of tears to cry but you will have cut yourself loose
from something that wasn't "correct" for you.
Sigh,
Leslie
|
91.9 | This is interesting! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Tue Apr 25 1995 14:42 | 16 |
|
I have written to him at his work address previously. Can you believe
it, this partner went through his briefcase and found some letters I
wrote (FUEL to the fire)..I have been asked not to give him gifts (at
Christmas and birthdays) as it is a PLOT to Steal him away!. THAT
hurt!. I have reminded him of the points you mentioned, but doesn't
feel manipulated or alarmed at being restricted in his associations.
However, it is not up to me to tell him to run from the "chains".
I might have mentioned, we have been in contact with each other (while
the partner was out of the country), and he seems willing to continue
the friendship..however, I wonder, maybe it was just a way to shut me
up?...Who knows how his mind works...
|
91.10 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Apr 25 1995 15:56 | 24 |
|
Few thoughts:
- It takes TWO to tango. If your friend is happy, then be happy
for him.
- You stated that you don't want to be firends with his partner.
To be perfectly honest, I wouldn't want my husband to be frineds
with people who don't like me/want to be freineds with me, for
whatever reason. I wouldn't stop him, but I wouldn't be like it.
There are tons of folks on this planet, I'm sure enough people
like me.
- Loyal friends do not let miscellaneous situations, including
relationship change their affection. It may mean staying in
the background when something else becomes more important
in their lives, like relationships and parenthood and catching
up on it again when things mellow out.
- Maybe it is time for you to cultivate other friendships while he works
on his relationship.
Eva
|
91.11 | It's really out of my hands now... | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Tue Apr 25 1995 16:10 | 21 |
|
I am glad he is happy, just wish I could see him every now and again.
Believe me, I don't want to live in his pocket...
The reason why I am not interested in his partner as a friend, is
because his partner does not understand male/female friendships, and
has never encouraged my friendship, rather he has demanded I be cut off
completely.
I am hoping that our friendship will survive through the years, but I
don't want to be a distant acquaintance to my friend.
I have plenty of other friends, this is just one particular incident in
my life which has flared up recently. I can let the friendship go..just
don't know if I want to, and don't think I should have to.
It is beyond the really painful hurting stage now, I am just curious as
to what other people would do if faced with same situation.
cheers!
|
91.12 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Apr 25 1995 16:28 | 18 |
|
Hey, you never what will happen. Maybe he and his partner can get
their relationship to a point of stablity that your friendship
would no longer be a threat. Or maybe he and his partner will
slpit up.
I Lost touch with a childhood friend after college. She and I
became engulfed in our own lives, building careers and relationships
and raising children. We have always thought about each other and
somehow we both knew our friendship and our affection for each other
was very much alive. We recently saw each other after 11 years of no
contact. Guess what, we picked up where we left off 11 years ago. We
both grew a lot, but not apart. The 11 years in between did not
dilute our frienship at all. In fact, the years aged our friendship
like a fine wine.
Eva
|
91.13 | my .02 | ASDG::CALL | | Tue Apr 25 1995 16:57 | 21 |
| Didn't you say you two 'used' to have more than friendship?
If this is so then you should accept the friendship as it now stands.
Let it go. Release it. You can still be friends but not in the same way
or at least not a close friendship.
If my so ex gave him a gift for christmas/birthday I would be asking
questions.
I'm still friends with my ex...he isn't however in my close personal
life.
I don't thing your friend is interested in causing his partner
jealousy.
Jealousy for no reason is another story. I think your friends partner
has reason in this case.
Just understand and try not to take it personal. You'll still be
friends.
|
91.14 | Ok I get the picture!!! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Tue Apr 25 1995 17:08 | 7 |
|
*Jealousy for no reason is another story. I think your friends partner
*has reason in this case.
BUT HE IS GAY!!!!!....and I'm FEMALE....where is the threat?
|
91.15 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Tue Apr 25 1995 17:23 | 26 |
| I think the perceived threat is that (your reply .4) at one time you
had "a bit more than friendship".
However, *I* think the partner is way out of line. I also think that,
sadly IMO, your friend is willing to settle for this possessive
behavior and seems to be taking the path of least resistance when it
comes to his friendship with you. His partner raided his briefcase:
this tells me your friend doesn't *want* to avoid his partner's tirades
(or he would have thrown out your letter after reading it) and he
doesn't mind having no privacy (even if this was the first instance of
briefcase-invasion, you don't mention anything about your friend being
upset about it).
Agreed that it's not up to you to tell your friend to "run from the
chains"--but I think that if you do hold that opinion (and maybe you
don't), then you have a right to express that opinion to him at least
once. He can ignore you or consider it.
After your further input, I really think I'd walk away from the whole
sorry mess. Maybe they really do fit each other's needs and will ride
into the sunset together... but I have a feeling that if you're not the
excuse, some other scapegoat will come along and eventually your friend
will get fed up with his partner's hissy fits (and move into something
healthy!).
Leslie
|
91.16 | | ASDG::CALL | | Tue Apr 25 1995 17:48 | 3 |
| I think I can understand how you feel...it's a loss just the same.
Not all is lost however....some but not all
|
91.17 | My thoughts | BETOVN::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Tue Apr 25 1995 19:06 | 42 |
|
I think what *I* would do is to tell everything that you're saying
here in this notesfile to my friend. Explain how you feel, that it
hurts that your friendship seems to be suffering, etc. All of it,
don't hold anything back. I prefer face to face as it allows for both
parties to read body language.
If, after all that, the friendship still suffered, *then* you have
to realize that friendship is a two way street -- it will only work if
both parties work at it and want it.
I think what someone said a few notes back was very valid --
friendships go through stages and cycles, and this may be what's
happening to your friendship now. Your friend may just be overburdened
right now.
Also, I would *not* be demanding or hostile in any way as his
partner seems to be. This will only put him on a fence with two
warring parties on either side -- possibly forcing him to make a Final
decision. No one likes to be backed into a corner. Instead, be gentle
and caring when expressing your hurt -- show him that you're not in any
way a threat, but that you simply want to come to a compromise or
settlement of some sort that is acceptable to all parties.
In the end, if none of this helps, you have to accept the fact that
the friendship may wither. On the other hand, it may be the case that
your friend could eventually wise up and come back seeking your
friendship -- there are so many possibilities. In any case, there is
only so much you can do. As with relationships, you have to be willing
to let go.
Regards,
Brian
|
91.18 | hello again: | MAL009::RAGUCCI | | Tue Apr 25 1995 20:42 | 9 |
|
Hi again,
Gay or not your dealing with a Bi#*h!
It can get vicious, most of the replies were some good, solid
advice. In any case, if all this thought and worry has to go into
because your and your friend use to be close, is it worth your
aggrivation? I know how that can be. Good Luck again.
Bye
|
91.19 | | CHEFS::CARTERC | | Wed Apr 26 1995 05:29 | 40 |
| I think you have to forget the fact that you are female and he is gay,
as far as his partner is concerned you are an EX...
I think he is reasonable to be wary of an EX who wants to see his
boyfriend on his own....
I think you need to think really hard about whether you really only
want to see him on his own because you don't like his boyfriend, or are
you also jealous and want a bit of him for yourself.
I don't like the new partners of my ex's, but if I wanted to still see
them I would accept that the 'rules' have changed and its only 'right'
to see them as a couple... at least until the new partner knows you and
is comfortable that there is NOTHING going on...
I will probably be jumped upon for taking the partners side, he should
TRUST completely - well yes, in an ideal world, but we are only people.
I suffer from jealousy and its not pleasant - even when you know its
irrational you can't help it - its not something to hate a person for -
my boyfriend and I discuss it, and we are dealing with it together...
this is what your friend needs to do.
You need to be more understanding... how would you feel if your current
boyfriend used to have a gay relationship, and that guy wanted to meet
him on his own all the time.... would you be 100% convinced he was now
heterosexual? would there not be a lingering doubt that he was
bisexual? are you so confident that your heterosexual relationship was
matching up and exceeeding his gay experiences that he'd never want to
have a gay lover again?
Finally, real friends respect the choices their friends make, they
don't necessarily agree - but they should support them... and be there
in case it doesn't work out.
Xtine
|
91.20 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Your mind is in here and mine is also | Wed Apr 26 1995 10:12 | 24 |
|
re - .6
I fail to see where it becomes your problem if you feel the pain
of the loss of the friendship. I see how you can _make_ it a problem
rather than go through that pain - but, understand; that is a choice
on your part. There's difficulty for you either way, so your question
becomes which is the path of least difficulty...and which path is the
most conscientious.
> I just want to keep in contact with my friend, without feeling
> guilty about what his boyfriend may feel.
Sounds a lot like "want my cake and eat it too". I dont think
you're going to get that - without a price paid on someone's part.
It might be you, dealing with these feelings of guilt, which'll be
work. It might be your friend, seeing you anyway but very discretely -
which'll be work for him...It might be the boyfriend, who gets dumped
over this whole deal, the loss becoming his to deal with.
Who's problem is this, and who do you think should pay the price
to have it "fixed"?
Joe
|
91.21 | There's only one solution really | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Wed Apr 26 1995 10:53 | 9 |
|
I don't think anyone SHOULD have to pay a price to fix this problem.
The problem is the jealousy, in one respect, as without it, there would
be no problem. I suspect I will be the one paying the price...I'm the
one whose going to have to let it all go..
Shame...he was such a nice guy.
|
91.22 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Your mind is in here and mine is also | Wed Apr 26 1995 10:58 | 8 |
|
Well, like I mentioned before, in doing so you might be doing him a
real favor. Because when he feels the pain of the loss, it just might
be enough for him to say to himself; "No, this isnt worth it; *nothing*
is worth being mis-trusted in this way!" and he'll make some changes for
himself, for his own good. He might become even a nicer guy as a result.
Joe
|
91.23 | | ASDG::CALL | | Wed Apr 26 1995 11:03 | 6 |
| I think you need to take a couple of steps back and think about your
own motives. I'm beginning to suspect that your friends partner might
be the one who's right to be wary of you. I also think that you are
having a tinge of jealousy yourself. Try to be objective and realistic
about all of this. I'm sure all of this is very painful for you. I'm
sure you can still keep your friendship...just not as close.
|
91.24 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 11:05 | 14 |
|
>The problem is the jealousy, in one respect, as without it, there
>would be no problem.
Well, the problem here is being human. We can chastise the partner
all we want. We can call him names, but he hasn't done anything wrong.
He didn't instigate this. Given the circumstances, he is just reacting
to a situation. Maybe he is immature and imperfect, but aren't we all?
Eva
|
91.25 | Too much hassle | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Wed Apr 26 1995 12:00 | 12 |
|
I think you need to take a couple of steps back and think about your
own motives. I'm beginning to suspect that your friends partner might
be the one who's right to be wary of you. I also think that you are
having a tinge of jealousy yourself.
The issue isn't my jealousy
How do you figure he needs to be wary of my motives?..I don't WANT this
guy as my partner...I just want to keep the friendship...or rather,
after all this discussion, I have more or less decided that is really
isn't worth fighting for. If my friend is too weak to stand up to
the jealousy, then I don't need the heartache.
|
91.26 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 12:56 | 27 |
|
I am kind of puzzled as to what is there to fight for. If things
are as pure amd simple as friendship should be, then friendship and
relationship can co-exist in harmony. But, if the friendship was not
simply a friendship, meaning that if other kinds of feelings were
involved, then it becomes a competition to the relationship, it
becomes an ex-relationship. Then, in all due respect, the current
relationship comes first. Regardless of your friend's partner
behavior, your friend should always put his partner's well being
first. In an ideal world, we can juggle all the balls, but in reality
we need to set priorities. A relationship is a commitment, not a
romantic friendship, it weighs much more than a friendship.
No matter how strange we find some relationships, we should honor
people's commitment. After reading more of your replies, I don't
think what you are looking for is a vanilla kind of friendship.
I think you are overstepping your boundary as a friend. I think
you are asking your friend to do something that's beyond normal
friendship, to be honest. Believe me, if my husband's ex was writing
letters to him or sending him presents, and didn't like me in addition,
I would be livid. No, I wouldn't grill my husband - I would call up the
ex and tell her to get the h*ll out of our lives!!! And you
know, I fully expect my husband to do the same.
Eva
|
91.27 | I only asked! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Wed Apr 26 1995 13:41 | 11 |
|
The gifts were given (both ways) before I knew anything about a
partner, before I had strong feelings for him...I don't give him any
gifts now.
I AM after a Vanilla kind of friendship, NOW. Things are different NOW
to how they were 6 months ago....
Don't you see any of your friends when your husband isn't around?..
|
91.28 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 14:26 | 28 |
|
>Don't you see any of your friends when your husband isn't around?..
Of course I do. But, I don't hang out with anyone who don't like my
husband either, whether he is around or not. I don't associate myself
with people who don't accept me as who I am and my husband is a part
of who I am. If a friend cannot get him or herself to understand me
and be supportive, then he or she is a friend no more. If a person,
friend or family, insists on being negative about my life, then I
don't deal with him or her any more. I made a choice in my life and
I don't care if other people like it. The bottom line is I made a
commitment to a person to be there for life, not just physically
but in all manners, and I didn't make the same commitment to anybody
else, friends or family.
Don't get me wrong. I am not naive, in any stretch of imagination.
I just believe in my own judgement and I don't need other people's
negativity, no matter how good the intention is, in my life. Nobody
else knows how to live my life better than I do. And I extend the
same courtesy and respect to others.
I understand your hurt. I am just bringing some points that may not
be obvious. I am just hoping you can see the situation from different
perspectives. There is no right or wrong, things just are.
Eva
|
91.29 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 14:43 | 12 |
|
One more thought:
What is jealousy? Jealousy is not something malicious in itself,
it is the expression of insecurity. It is probably not the best way
to express one's insecurity, but that's another topic. The only
way to fix jealousy is to make the person feel secure, whatever
it takes.
Eva
|
91.30 | and now for something completely different | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Wed Apr 26 1995 15:22 | 13 |
| Goodness! That's why there's chocolate and vanilla, I guess (no
reflection on the "vanilla friendship" concept). When I am in a
relationship I certainly do not require my friends to "love me, love my
dog [SO]". They are different people; if they want to form their own
friendships, fine, be my guest, but my friendships aren't dependent on
any other people. I *never* put up with any friendship restrictions
that my SO tries to impose (they rapidly become a *former* SO if they
persist in this). Sure, jealousy is a manifestation of insecurity, and
insecurity is a problem. However, it is not MY problem, and I won't
allow it to rule my life. And I believe the only person who can "fix"
jealousy is the jealous person hirself.
Leslie
|
91.31 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 16:09 | 12 |
|
Looking for perfection in an imperfect world can leave us
empty-handed and lonely. Discriminating against human nature
can leave us angry and confused. There are as many sets of
true reality as there are people. Not understanding the
varied complexities of life and not having compassion for
people who are different from us can leave us stranded in
our own little cave.
Eva
|
91.32 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 16:27 | 19 |
|
re .30
Most people are not bad-natured. No one is perfect either. It
dpends on what each one of us can and cannot tolerate. Maybe
you can't deal with jealousy. Maybe I can't deal with the
main-stream. Maybe some one else cannot deal with poverty.
Everything has a price. Every choice has pros and cons. We
choose what we fancy us and what we can put up with. To
simply say someone is of of no good because he/she is insecure,
for whatever reason, too narrowly focused. Every single one of
us is insecure to a diiferent degree. Even holding onto the one-
selfness and being afraid of losing one's identity due
to some restriction is an expression of insecurity. ;-);-)
Eva
|
91.33 | | ASDG::CALL | | Wed Apr 26 1995 16:28 | 10 |
| re.30
yup that's how it is...a former so it would soon be if he
kept seeing someone on the side that makes his so very upset.
Especially without the so knowing.
If you can't be honest and trust your so you don't have anything.
You can't be carrying on behind their back. Even if it is friendship
with a former so.
|
91.34 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed Apr 26 1995 16:30 | 7 |
|
re .33
Excellent point about the trust. No trust no relationship.
Eva
|
91.35 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Wed Apr 26 1995 16:38 | 11 |
| Well, but in a convoluted way we're making the same point. If my SO
doesn't trust me to have a *friendship*, then I would tell the SO to
take a hike (hence, former SO).
I wasn't talking about expecting my SO to let me sneak around and do
the horizontal boogie with a "friend".
(I never said jealous people are "bad". They are not a good
personality-type-fit for *me* as far as SOs go.)
Leslie
|
91.36 | This is what I think! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Wed Apr 26 1995 17:43 | 3 |
|
Thank you Leslie!!
|
91.37 | | CHEFS::CARTERC | | Thu Apr 27 1995 08:54 | 13 |
| You are so intolerent of your friends 'weakness' in not being able to
stand up to his partners jealousy....
I think you sound very jealous... you are jealous that you cannot make
your friend do what you want - you are jealous that his partner appears
to be able to control his behaviour more than you can?
Not much of a friendship - more like an ex-relationship?
Xtine
|
91.38 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Thu Apr 27 1995 10:58 | 28 |
|
re .35
The problem is trust not something to expect from someone by default.
Trust is earned, it is gained by displaying certain honorable
quailites, keeping promises, etc. It takes a long time to build up
trust and it takes one or two incidents to destroy it.
So, if we look at the situation at hand, the original noter's friend,
IMO, is not trustworthy from a relationship point of view. He has
been doing things behind his partner's back, knowing fully well
his partner's hot buttons. Why should his partner trust him? Why
should his partner trust the original noter, knowing what had happened
before? How can we blame the partner for being insecure when all
these things are going on in a new relationship, about 6 months old?
If we got into the partner's shoes, we'd probably panic as well!
I trust my husband 100%, since in the 12 years we've been together,
he has NONE, not even one, incident that would lead me to question his
faithfulness. But, if he had done anything that caused any suspicion,
I would definitely worry. But then, if his character was not as lint
free, he wouldn't be around this long.
Eva
|
91.39 | What!? | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Your mind is in here and mine is also | Fri Apr 28 1995 11:43 | 32 |
|
I'm sorry, but I just cant let this one go...;')
Re .29 -
"The only way to fix jealousy is to make the person feel secure,
whatever it takes."
Oooooh, I dont know about that! Since when do *we* take
responsibility for what another person feels, in a "whatever it takes"
manner? That's *codependency*!! - it's a very dangerous thing to do
and is nothing even remotely like "compassion". That stuff can kill you
BTW...snuff your life right out...if taken to extremes.
"Jealousy" is their problem. THEIR problem! As long as someone isnt
deliberately aggravating that quality in another - as long as this is
just an ordinary life situation, of the kind that life will just happen
to present from time to time (which it sounds like to me...) it's
trully and wholly the jealous person's difficulty to bear. No one else
has to do anything to "take care" of their feelings.
In fact, if you do anything to take them out of their feelings,
you're actually doing them a diservice! You're short-circuiting the
opportunity for them to work though it; investigate whats behind the
feeling and maybe come to some new and profound understanding of
themselves; learn how to get though it already; find some security for
themselves in and of themselves - all on their own!
IMHO, in my model, if the friend submits to his lovers jealousy
what you have here is a lose-lose-lose situation.
Joe
|
91.40 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Fri Apr 28 1995 11:47 | 4 |
| Good to hear your voice in here again, Joe. [I had *thought* that
would be your opinion too :-) ]
Leslie
|
91.41 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Fri Apr 28 1995 11:58 | 9 |
| Also re .38 (trust), I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that
the romantic segment of OSG_AC and friend had ended, reverted to
platonic friendship only, BEFORE the partner arrived on the scene.
Now, the partner can and does throw fits "forbidding" any contact with
our basenoter; who is he to "forbid"?! Certainly his input is worthy
of consideration, discussion, etc., but hey--Lincoln FREED the slaves.
Leslie
|
91.42 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri Apr 28 1995 14:57 | 65 |
|
Joe,
Hold your horses...
Some people needs $ to feel secure, some people
needs lots of hugs and kisses, some people needs their
own identity, some people needs daily phone calls,
some people need good track records, some people need
other things...That's what I meant by whatever it takes.
Since when is each and every one of us perfect
and secure? Are we all supposed to wait until we are all
perfect to be involved in any relationship? Most people aren't
even close to perfect by the time they hit the coffin.
This is where compassion and true love come in. We need
to understand that no one is perfect, everyone has a
different set of problems to work on. In the book
"The Road Less Travel", the author brought a good point
about love. If we love a person, we help the person to
grow spiritually. We are not responsbile for the person,
but out of love, we help the person work through their
problems. I mean, if we know our partner had some bad
experience and is insecure, would we tell our partner
that it is his/her own problem? Well, like it or not,
it had become our problem. We can either ignore it -
it is not going to get better by itself - or help in
any way we can. Afterall a relationship/marriage is a
commitment that says the partner will be with us for the
rest of our lives, even when we are poor, sick, old and
wrinkled, and dying. And we are saying to them - this is
your own freaking problem, you go fix it yourself? Do we
say that to our children? I hope not. Children grow up,
move away and have their own lives. Partners stay around
till the end. Is it too much to ask ourselves to be considerate
about our partner's shortcomings? Or are we just too damn
self-centered to even think about our partner's feelings?
Or we too short-sighted to understand that people do grow
and that we have 40-50 years in front of us to become
better persons? Little toddlers are wicked jealous and so
are we supposed to shut them out... Come on, let's not get
stuck in the I/me/myself/my rights rut. What is the point
of being with someone who can't understand and tolerate
our shortcomings? Everyone likes our good points. We might
as well live by ourselves. I am not saying we are responsible
for someone's weakness, I'm saying that if we love someone,
we will not rub salt into their old wounds. This is real life,
not a classroom.
In trying to live by some societal ideals in this imperfect
world, we lose touch with our own heart and soul. We lose our
humanity and comapssion because we are told that our loved ones
problems are not our own. We lose our sense of honor when we let
our love ones suffer. We all live in this rigid ME compartment
and still never be able to see and feel beyond. Don't you see
the irony of it all - trying to protect ourselves from hurt
by not loving truly and totally. In the end we are the losers
because we can't get the kind of trur love we are looking for?
How can we expect people to love us for life when we can't even
help bandaging their wound? We can only take out when we put in.
Eva
|
91.43 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri Apr 28 1995 15:08 | 16 |
|
Our lives are full of pain, hurt, wars, death, deceit,
loses, failures, lies, disappointments. Our lives are
also full of good things.It is wicked easy to find people
to celebrate our
fortune, to share our fun. But how many people can
we find in our lives to stand by us when all the bad
things happen? The 1 or 2 people who promise to stick
around thru thin and thick, we are going to tell them
to take a hike with their bad experiences and their
shortcomings? Is this stupidity or what? Or am I
missing something?!
Eva
|
91.44 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri Apr 28 1995 15:32 | 10 |
|
Before there were therapists/counselors/psychologists/self-help
books/meetings, there were plain old friends/family members/respected
elders/religion to help people go thru tough times. Essentially,
we are as a society delegating an important job to a group of
professionals. The professionals are making good money and we are
as unhappy as ever. Wonder why.
Eva
|
91.45 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Fri Apr 28 1995 15:47 | 15 |
| .42> And we are saying to them - this is
> your own freaking problem, you go fix it yourself? Do we
> say that to our children? I hope not.
> Little toddlers are wicked jealous and so
> are we supposed to shut them out...
We are not speaking here of children but of unrelated adults, whose
nurturing should have been provided by their parents. If this was
lacking, peer compassion is surely commendable, but the ultimate
responsibility (I didn't say blame) for "fixing" things like severe
insecurity lies with the individual. ("Your right to swing your
[jealousy] arm ends at my nose.")
Leslie
|
91.46 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri Apr 28 1995 15:57 | 10 |
|
>We are not speaking here of children but of unrelated adults,
We are talking about a partner in a relationship, not any person
off the street. If someone becomes our partner, then they are
as important and close and related to us as our children, if not
more.
Eva
|
91.47 | | TP011::KENAH | Do we have any peanut butter? | Fri Apr 28 1995 17:33 | 10 |
| >The professionals are making good money and we are as unhappy as ever.
>Wonder why.
I'm not as unhappy as ever; I'm a lot less unhappy, and I expect
this trend to continue -- a direct result of paying good money to
professionals. For me, it has been worth it. Friends helped, but the
truly important work needed professional guidance. Family? Religion?
Hardly -- they were the cause -- they definitely don't have the cure.
andrew
|
91.48 | Hey!..It was just a question! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Sat Apr 29 1995 21:08 | 9 |
|
I'm not intolerant, I just can't understand it. You have to be in my
shoes to know what I am looking at. You don't know this person, you
don't know that it is totally out of character to allow himself to be
controlled by someone else.
Don't jump down my throat. I only asked what advice people could give!
|
91.49 | I think it's a little selfishness | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Sat Apr 29 1995 21:16 | 11 |
| *fortune, to share our fun. But how many people can
*we find in our lives to stand by us when all the bad
*things happen? The 1 or 2 people who promise to stick
*around thru thin and thick, we are going to tell them
*to take a hike with their bad experiences and their ....
Yes, but when you want to stick with someone, but the OTHER of the 1 or
2 just can't cope with that..
What are you to do then?...Hence, my original question.
|
91.50 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon May 01 1995 11:07 | 41 |
|
re .49
>Yes, but when you want to stick with someone, but the OTHER of the 1
>or 2 just can't cope with that..
I think you've misintrepreted my note. I was referring
specifically being tolerant/considerate of a partner's weakness
in a relationship/marriage/commitment, not a friendship.
There are only 2 people involved in a relationship and the
commitment is between of them. You don't stick with someone
if they already have someone to stick with. A relationship
supersedes a friendship if you have to prioritize it.
This is why I said before that I think you've crossed the
friendship boundary.
About the out of chacracter, etc. Think about this for a second.
Each of us have frineds who have different interests and backgorund,
but our friends have similar values and outlooks as ours. If your
friend uses the same yardstick to choose friends, does it ring a bell
if he chooses a "jealousy, inconsiderate" person as a partner. It
could mean that your perception of the partner is off. It could mean
that you and the partner are simliar. Or it could mean that your
friend is not consistent. You would like to think that your friend
is inconsistent in picking out people. But have you consider the other
possiblities? I don't think you are honest or in touch about your
feelings.
Of course, I don't know you, your friend and his partner. I can only
read your notes and reply to the info that you supplied. I am not
taking any stand or passing any judgement or promote any beliefs. I
am trying to be objective and point out some of the less obvious
possibilities. I am also tyring to state the basic values and expectations
that we consdier as guidelines in human interactions. You don't have to agree with
I say. Sometimes, the truths are the hardest things to face, especially
when things are not going our way.
Eva
|
91.51 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon May 01 1995 11:28 | 28 |
|
re .47
One thing we need to keep in mind is that we, this generation in
US, is only a teeny, tiny sampling of data. Your observation about
family and religion may be correct of this country for the past
30 years or so. What about the rest of the world? What about people
before then? If things had always been so bad, wouldn't we be extinct
by now? Believe it or not, a well known psychology, Miller, from Cambridge
said in a magazine that Buddha was a psychologist, a wicked good one.
He also said that a lot of the practicing psychologists are closet
Buddists (Zen and other varities). The longest continuously surviving
civilizations/cultures, India and China (for 8 thousand years), had
always followed simliar teachings and are extremely family orientated.
Human beings would not have survived all tens of thousands of years of
hardship without a support system of family/friends/religion.
Just because we, in this generation, had bad experiences with 1 or 2
forms of religion does not mean that all religions are like that.
Just because we, in this generations, had bad experiences at home,
does not mean all families are like that. Visit other countries,
especially ones that have been around longer than we have, we'll
have a better idea what life and family is about.
Eva
|
91.52 | Fixes come from within, not without | BETOVN::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Tue May 02 1995 14:09 | 25 |
|
I agree with Joe big-time on this one -- you *don't* "fix" things
in others. They fix them, or they don't get fixed. Period. No ifs,
ands or buts.
I tried a couple times when I was younger. I was dating someone
with low self esteem, and tried in every way I could think of to show
her how *I* viewed her. None of it helped one jot. I finally realized
that for most if not all things like that, each of us has to find those
things for ourselves, in our own time and way. It's kinda like doing
math problems -- you can be shown the answer, but unless you've gone
through the process of figuring it out yourself you won't understand
it. Sorry to use an analogy so far disconnected, but it was the first
thing to come to mind. ;-)
Andrew's comments remind me of something I heard once (from a
comedian, I think). They said, "Of *course* your family knows all your
buttons -- *they* installed them!" True in many cases.
Brian
|
91.53 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue May 02 1995 14:40 | 25 |
|
Brian,
I understand what you are saying, but I don't think you
understood what I was getting at.
There are two scenarios. One - you know what's wrong with them,
they don't understand what's wrong with them and you try to fix them.
Two - you and them understand what is wrong with them and you support
and help them to fix themselves. I never meant the scenario one, no
where in any of my entries. All along I meant Two. Maybe I am taking
an uncommon stand, but I don't think I should be quoted out of
context.
What I got from Joe and some others is that scenario Two
is not acceptable and that we can tell them to take a hike - like
come back when they are straight.
I understand this is a touchy subject for some of us. But
let's try to give people a benefit of the doubt and not get sucked
into the negative vortex.
Eva
|
91.54 | ex | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Your mind is in here and mine is also | Tue May 02 1995 17:16 | 46 |
|
Re .50, Eva -
>There are only 2 people involved in a relationship and the
>commitment is between of them. You don't stick with someone
>if they already have someone to stick with. A relationship
>supersedes a friendship...
So...what happens when someone you know, in a relationship, is
about to make a grave error in it - and as a friend you can see that
from the distance, while they cannot in being "in it"? Do you just let
them go on without a word because "the relationship" is somehow holier
than the...mere friendship you share?
I always thought that your best friend was the one who would extend
themselves to tell you that which might be most difficult to hear - in
the face of whatever - staying out of it beyond that. Does someone really
lose the right to say "Hey, er, look at what's happening here!" because
they may be addressing sacred space? That sounds like an ancient and
pervasive tradition to me...I dont buy your survival argument BTW; ancient
traditions are *not* necessarily the best way to go today, just because
they may have served a practical purpose at some point in history.
Re .53 -
> What I got from Joe and some others is that scenario Two
>is not acceptable and that we can tell them to take a hike - like
>come back when they are straight.
There's also the idea of "tough-love". Sometimes, the best thing
you can do for someone is to let them fall on their face, "hit their
bottom with it" so to speak. There's a joke in the recovery circles
that a "slip" in Al-ANON is to have a moment of compassion for the
alcoholic. They call it "tough" because it's hard to do -
While the character anomaly of jealousy may not be quite in the
same league as alcoholism, enabling either by changing your own
behavior to fit whatever circumstances the other person creates is
*not* a good solution! I'm sure you can see how, in either situation,
that may "seem" like you're being supportive, but in reality you're not.
The story has been told thousands of times; of the long-suffering
wife who calls her husband's job to give an excuse as to why he's not
going to be in work today.
Joe
|
91.55 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed May 03 1995 11:25 | 43 |
|
Joe,
>So...what happens when someone you know, in a relationship, is
>about to make a grave error in it - and as a friend you can see
>that from the distance, while they cannot in being "in it"? Do you just
>let them go on without a word because "the relationship" is somehow holier
>...
Again, please put this in context. IMO, the situation here is that
a more-than-a-friend/ex wants to keep the friendship/maybe-more-than-a-
friendship going while the other is already involved in a relationship.
To put it plain and simple and blunt, the ex cannot let go.
Like it or not, a marriage/relationship is more important than a
friendship, if someone has to choose, IMO. You don't have to assume
your friends' debts, bad credits, responsiblity to take care of them
when they are old and sick and dying. A marriage/relationship is a
commitment/promise we make to another person that we'll share our
life with the person. IMO, it is not a matter of holier/sacred-er,
it is a matter of hard work, compromise, and discipline. It is a
bigger/stronger/more serious commitment than a friendship, IMO.
Maybe you and I have different ideas of what relationships and
friendships are about and thus the disagreement here.
Yes, we could "give" advice to friends when they ask advice,
but if they are happy, should we tell them that they should not be
happy?! It's back to your "you can't fix them if they don't want
to be fixed". And it seems to be this is the case here.
>Tough love...
Yes, we have to let people find their own limits - let them
fail; that is part of helping people. Helping people, IMO, does
not make holding their hands or spoon feeding them. To me, it
means being aware of their problems, show them different options,
and pros and cons of each option, be prepared to be there when
they fail. Sure, everyone has to go thru the tunnel alone, but
there is nothing wrong with bringing along a cellular phone, I
think.
Eva
|
91.56 | | BETOVN::NELSON | Are we grading on a curve? | Wed May 03 1995 15:54 | 12 |
|
Eva,
I assumed scenario 1, by virtue of the fact that I take scenario 2 for granted.
That is, I *assume* that supporting someone when they need help is something
that we all do; a rather optimistic outlook I grant you.
Brian
|
91.57 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Wed May 03 1995 16:29 | 11 |
|
Brian,
The confusion here is we have no indication that scenario 1
actually happened. Scenario 2 could be happening since the friend
didn't seem to mind the fits. Another scenario could be the friend
made up or exaggerated the jealousy bit so that he could get out of
the "friendship" easier.
Eva
|
91.58 | This is not your average marriage/relationship | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Fri May 05 1995 08:25 | 14 |
| ** Again, please put this in context. IMO, the situation here is that
**a more-than-a-friend/ex wants to keep the friendship/maybe-more-than-a-
**friendship going while the other is already involved in a relationship.
**To put it plain and simple and blunt, the ex cannot let go.
The more-than-a-friend (NOT ex), wants to keep the friendship, NO more
than that....
Just wants to be friends without causing arguments...
Has let go...
|
91.59 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri May 05 1995 09:43 | 15 |
|
re .58
>The more-than-a-friend (NOT ex), wants to keep the friendship, NO more
>than that....
>Just wants to be friends without causing arguments...
You can call it anything you want. To me, it came across as
the way I put it, from the little information you've provided. We can
agree to disagree.
Eva
|
91.60 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Fri May 05 1995 11:04 | 9 |
| Hey OSG_AC,
How dare you presume to know your own situation! :-D
Apparently in Eva's world, downgrades do not exist; therefore your
(consistent) input appears illogical, therefore she must "agree to
disagree" with your reality.
Leslief
|
91.61 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri May 05 1995 12:06 | 24 |
|
Leslie,
I never presumed to know her situation. I read what
she wrote, just like everyone else in here. I responded
per my interpretation of what I read. And so do you.
All I am trying to do is stay as un-emotional as possible
and be objective about what I read.
Since when do I have to appease everyone? Since
when do I have to put aside values and principles so as to
fit in the latest trend? I don't care if the rest of the world
think I am political incorrect. If I think an object is a shoe,
I'll call it a shoe, no matter how unpopular that makes me. I
am not going to call it a hat, just because someone wants me to
think and say it is a hat, or because the rest of the crowd
calls it a hat for whatever reason. Obviously, no one has to
agree with me on anything. I know who I am, what I stand for,
and no amount of peer pressure is going to change me. No one
has to like me, either!
Eva
|
91.62 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri May 05 1995 13:05 | 17 |
|
Leslie,
Yes, I cannot presume that she knew the entire
picture either, it would be naive for me to do so. If she knew
the entire picutre, she wouldn't be here asking for
suggestions, the answer would be obvious to her, IMO. When
I went back and look at all her entries, it was obvious
to *ME* what she was seeking was more than a friendship,
once I cut thru the emotional stuff. Sure, it may be hard
for her to hear, but it is not my style to cover up the
grud. If people want to pass judgement based on emotions and
one-sided views, that's fine with me. But they can't get me
to narrow my mind.
Eva
|
91.63 | Solution! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Fri May 05 1995 13:40 | 27 |
|
Lets not get all fluffed up about it. I have received some good
advice...but nobody ever listens to every piece of advice. This simple
fact was that I DID once want more than friendship, but that was BEFORE
I knew there was a relationship with another man involved. Since I
accepted that fact, and I have, I only wanted to remain friends with my
friend, without having it painted as a plot!....
I understand your viewpoint Eva, but you speak from the perspective of
a Marriage type of committment. The relationship I am referring to in
my notes is one between two gay men, of which I had no idea about at
the time, and of which I was then led to believe did not really exist. Had
my friend acted as though he were gay, and in a committed relationship,
then the feelings between him and I would have been kept inside, and then
I wouldn't have needed to "defend" my friendship with him.
I certainly don't expect to have to give up my friend should I be in a
relationship with someone, and I don't see why he should...
You have provided me with some valuable points, of which I have thought
about and decided that , No, in actual fact, the friendship is not
worth fighting for, on the sheer basis of trust, as there were many
lies surrounding the complications that caused this problem.
Still, it is with regret that I do so, as this person makes me happy,
and I admire him a lot for many other reasons...should he wish to
remain in contact, then I will have no qualms.
|
91.64 | | USCTR1::WOOLNER | Your dinner is in the supermarket | Fri May 05 1995 13:41 | 8 |
| OK, OK, OSG_AC hasn't asked me to defend her, so I'll get off this
merry-go-round. I thought .59 was a rude contradiction of the
basenoter's very specific statement (.58) of her expectations for the
friendship at the time she entered the basenote. So I tried to figure
out what could make you (essentially) call her a liar. Now I don't
care what your motivations are.
Leslie
|
91.65 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri May 05 1995 14:08 | 18 |
|
re. 63
I apologize if I ever came across as judgemental and offensive.
I am not good at being subtle, but I'd never pass judgement on
others' actions because it is not my place, we are all humans and
I've made my share of mistakes in my life.
A lot of my comments about relationships/jealousy/... in this string
were directed towards the prevailing trend of people passing judgement
on other people based on a few keywords and this whole thing turned into
a rathole.
I'm sorry if I've made this experience unpleasant for you.
Eva
|
91.66 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Fri May 05 1995 14:11 | 15 |
|
Leslie,
>So I tried to figure out what could make you (essentially) call
>her a liar.
You are free to interpret anything you read the way that suits
you.
>Now I don't care what your motivations are.
Same here.
Eva
|
91.67 | | DKAS::GALLUP | You are what you think. | Fri May 05 1995 14:54 | 67 |
|
Just to through a bit of "food for thought" that I haven't seen
mentioned in this string so far.
In the basenote, you mentioned:
>What would be the best thing to do with the neglected friendship I have with
>this gay man, who must endure an enormous amount of argument at home with his
>jealous boyfriend every time he has contact with me?
One of the most difficult parts of a relationship with a bisexual person
is coming to terms with an internal fear that perhaps the person you're
with will sometime, somehow, want to go back to dating the opposite sex
than you are.
The reason this is such a huge fear is that it's not personal against
us...that, in fact, our mate might feel a pull in a direction that we
have no possibility in being able to provide for them.
What you may be experiencing in your relationship with this man is his
desire to work with his partner's possible lack of trust that he might
leave him for a woman.
If this is the case, you are not a particular woman in yiour friend's
life, rather you represent that whole concept over which he has no
control. He cannot provide his mate (your friend) with what women
can provide him.
If you truly want to continue your friendship with your friend, then
you need to concentrate on the fact that your friendship with him
INCLUDES his mate....and that, to support your friend in his
relationship with this man, you must BE trustworthy as a female friend
to your friend. You must respect your friend's boundaries that he is
placing on your friendship with him, and you must have your friendship
with him on HIS terms.
If you're not willing to do that, then you should consider letting
it go. You are not the number one priority in his life, in fact, it's
clear that although you're a friend, when it comes to priorities in
his life, his partner takes precidence over you.
So, my "advice" is to have the relationship with your friend on his
terms...be trustworthy in that relationship, and support him to have
what we wants (this partner). Or let go.......
You can't hope to have this friendship with this man be successful
if you're approaching it from the perspective of what YOU get out
of it.
>>My friend assures me he still wants the friendship with me..then why is
>>it so stagnant?
Because, again, on the list of priorities, you're lower on the
list. If you want this friendship, you must accept it on those
terms.
Are you in a relationship at this time?
Best Wishes,
Kath
|
91.68 | hmm | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Fri May 05 1995 15:06 | 6 |
|
Are you in a relationship at this time?
No.
|
91.69 | How appropriate for a .69 reply. :-} | DKAS::GALLUP | You are what you think. | Fri May 05 1995 16:35 | 14 |
|
> Are you in a relationship at this time?
>
> No.
Just a rhetorical question you might want to consider the answer
to....
Would your perspective on the importance of this
friendship in your life change if you were in a
relationship with someone else?
Kath
|
91.70 | Geez! | OPCO::OSG_AC | | Fri May 05 1995 17:00 | 11 |
|
Would your perspective on the importance of this
friendship in your life change if you were in a
relationship with someone else?
NO....HOW MANY TIMES do I have to explain that I only want to see him
every now and again, see how things are with him..I DON'T want to live
in his pocket. Just a coffee once in a while!!!
|
91.71 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Mon May 08 1995 14:18 | 25 |
|
re. 70
I hear your frustration.
Two things, all IMO:
- It is ok to feel hurt/pain and it is ok to want to
continue with a good thing, whatever it was. I never
pass any judgement on you and your feelings. There is
no right or wrong, no good or bad with feelings and
emotions. It is what we do with these feelings and
emotions, whether we act them out - let them drive our
actions, let them cancel out our logic - that is
of concern.
- It helps to deal with the feelings the way they are,
not the way the world thinks is proper. When we start
to worry what other people will say when we tell them
how we really feel about something, then we start to
"hide" our true selves so we can protect ourselves from
others' judgement and criticism.
Eva
|