T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1317.2 | Can you say Chauvanistic Attitudes? | XCUSME::HOGGE | I am the King of Nothing | Tue Nov 03 1992 13:46 | 49 |
| Well, from what you've said, he spent a period of his life trying to
become 'socially aware' and fialed miserably at it.
My own experience shows ME that 'control' in a relationship is reached
via mutual undrstanding and communication. NOT having a kid. Children
become one more 'item' on a list of 'how do WE do it'.
His problem however, is that his Ex has used his daughters to
manipulate him. I've had my Ex do the same thing. After the 20th or
so time, I finally found the money to get a lawyer and get my rights
as a father covered in more 'well defined' terms. Including my rights
when I fail in child support, (only happend two times) or a payment is
late (several times). When I can talk to him via the phone, what
exactly she has to provide for him. What she can and can not say about
me. How increases in child support are to be determined (all increases
and decreases of child support in my situation are based on my wages
and any increase there of... that is if I get a 6 percent raise, then
my child support goes up 6 percent also. If I get a 10 percent
decrease then my child support goes down 10 percent... If I end up
unemployed, I pay the appropriate percentage of my unemployment for
child support... etc. It works well for me.)
Ours was not a typical divorce, there was no ranting or raving save for
the day of the break up. Then we concluded that going back was
senseless because there were too many problems in the relationship, we
gave counseling a try, it didn't work, we divorced. We maintain some
communication, although we both have our 'moments' when we think
personal feelings are getting into our judgement about situations. We
ARE careful of that and speak frankly when we think this situation is
developing.
Anyhow... he's got a definate problem with thinking like this. His
attitude is way out of line and based on what appears to be souly
personal experience, from a bad marriage. And he doesn't seem to be
giving you a fair chance. I would look into the possibility that he
may not really want any more children. It seems strange that he's
been having a lot of 'excuses' for not having children. From financal
problems to personal beliefs.... (There is no such thing as being
financially 'ready' for a child... if you are, things happen you don't
expect. IF you aren't you manage to find a way to survive the needs
and events that happen that you don't expect.)
One other thing, there is the possibility that he's 'selfish' in that
he has a lifestyle that he likes now, and having a child fit into it
means, he has to give up things he doesn't want to. (I've known this
to happen on more then one occasion).
FWIW
Skip
|
1317.3 | please consider the child first and foremost | EARRTH::MACKINNON | | Tue Nov 03 1992 15:18 | 16 |
|
I think he needs to stop blaming people for his miserable time
in life. Only he can be responsible for his actions. If he
allowed his ex to treat him poorly, then he allowed it. He
needs to grow up and face his responsiblity in life.
Do you believe that having a child with this man would be
the best thing for the child? I would seriously ponder
this question before you make a decision. Granted he has
been burned once before with respect to his kids and I can
easily see how that would make him not want to even have
that possiblity exist again. However, please do what would
be best for the potential child.
Michele
|
1317.1 | | XCUSME::HOGGE | I am the King of Nothing | Wed Nov 04 1992 11:30 | 21 |
| Ummmm if it's 'Not about us' then the extremly long amount of
background information isn't necessary.
But since you asked, I think the outlook is a bit chauvanistic. Women
are not 'natrual' nags. They ARE different from men, and have a
different prospective on things then we males have, but that's about
the total extent of it. The only thing necessary is an honest effort
on BOTH parts to try and communicate effectively. That is, for every
man who can make such complaints I can find a woman who can state
"Men have no emotions, no sense of responsiblity, they're nothing but
overgrown children and that's all they well ever be. They have no
concept of 'security' and don't care one bit about how they treat us
females so long as they get thier pleasure from us, and as soon as they
get it, or are refused it, they move on to the next 'toy'."
Basically what it all amounts to is a load of 'cracked thinking' and
ignorance about the workings of the male and female minds.
Skip
|
1317.4 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Nov 04 1992 12:00 | 4 |
| My apologies for this note coming and going a few times. I've moved replies
from the earlier entry and I think that it's now ok.
Steve
|
1317.5 | | BROKE::BNELSON | Angel of Music! Hide no longer! | Thu Nov 05 1992 16:20 | 30 |
|
Since I can't speak for other men, and since I've never been
divorced, I'm afraid I will have to limit my response to what you've
talked about here.
My impression is that your husband is scarred from the experience
of his ex-wife; this is to be expected and natural. However, it's my
feeling that the extent to which he lets that experience rule his
current life is *not* natural. At least, not healthy.
I do not believe that women have an innate need to control men; I
think this is *person*-based, not *gender*-based. That is, different
people based on their experiences may have this need but that it is not
simply found in one gender or the other.
I can see why you feel offended, but I would try to limit those
feelings. Remember the saying, "Once bitten twice shy"? It's pretty
clear that it's nothing to do with you, but just a result of his
baggage. I think it's possible for you to convince your husband
otherwise, but don't expect it to happen overnight. Remind him you're
not his ex-wife, but a totally different person. And most importantly
*show* him you're not like her.
Brian
|