T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1293.1 | Communicate | KNGBUD::B_SIART | Say something that makes me think! | Fri Aug 14 1992 17:35 | 9 |
| Anon;
Saying nothing doesn't get you anywhere. Simply ask her if
she's comfortable enough in your relationship with her for it to be
exclusive. Tell her that your ready for this, but you want to know
where her feelings are at, at this time in the relationship. Remember,
communication is the key.
-Brian
|
1293.2 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | but I _like_ tuna! | Sat Aug 15 1992 13:50 | 5 |
| .0> I'm not prepared to use the L word;
So use the E word ... exclusive.
There's nothing wrong with telling her what you want.
|
1293.3 | There is another issue here. | CCAD23::TAN | | Sun Aug 16 1992 23:53 | 10 |
| Anon,
There can surely be nothing wrong with expressing your true emotions to "#1".
What I find unacceptable is the implication in your note that you're keeping
#2 in reserve in case the object of your affection does not work out.
You have the potential to cause a great deal of pain here and I suggest that you
consider being honest to both of them as well as yourself.
Joyce
|
1293.4 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | rotate your tires, Cindy? | Mon Aug 17 1992 01:23 | 1 |
| What's wrong with a spare or two, until you become exclusive?
|
1293.5 | re: -1 Nothin' at all... | CCAD23::TAN | | Mon Aug 17 1992 01:58 | 7 |
| So long as they (the spares) understand that that's what they are. I don't think
you can have it both ways. Anon. obviously wants to commit to one relationship,
and if you believe yourself to care enough for that, and committed enough,
then hell, what's with a spare (Gawd what an awful term) to cushion the blow if
things don't work out? IMHO, Doesn't seem terribly committed/sincere to me!
Joyce
|
1293.6 | It's not fair to have spares | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Tue Aug 18 1992 11:40 | 8 |
| me either...
It is a pity, but it sounds like choosing a tie to wear... lets see if
this fit, if not... let's get this other!
It is amazing how many people let themselves be other's spares, no
wonder there's so much hurt arround.
|
1293.7 | Be Patient! | STOHUB::DSCGLF::FARLOW | Simplify! | Tue Aug 18 1992 12:22 | 19 |
| Re: 0
In the delicate early stages of dating, don't rush things. Show that you care
but don't say it. Often people are still not sure early on and if you force
them to make a committment too soon they will feel trapped. As you spend time
together you will continue to grow closer. There is no need to force a
committment. Uncertainty increases excitement. If you have a carefree attitude
you will be more desireable. There is time for committments later on when
they are based on deep feelings not oral agreements.
As for #1 and #2, make up your mind. If you really want to be with #1 then your
thoughts should be with her. You have no right expecting committment from
someone if you aren't committed to them. Being committed in a relationship is
demonstrated by actions not words. You will also find that you cannot be
patient if you are trying to have a second alternative available.
Good luck,
Steve
|
1293.8 | more on my situation | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Why not ask why? | Tue Aug 18 1992 14:25 | 66 |
|
The following reply is being posted anonymously, from the basenoter.
i am not "keeping #2 in reserve". i've explained to her
that i'm seeing someone now and i would like things to
work out there, and i don't wish to jepodize what i
have with "infidelity", if that term can even be used
here.
what i am doing is keeping my options open. #1 has made
no commitment to me, and although i like her very much,
i don't know her very well yet. i've seen old lovers
come crashing back, and watched people go back to the
ones they bored me to death with the details of how
terribly they treated them...
i've been single for a year or more. i dated a few woman,
but none that i felt were right for me. i tried to treat
all with honesty and respect, and to just basically do
the right thing.
that's what i want to do here.
i knew that by using numbers instead of names here, i'd
be cheapening things. i'm not surprised by the necktie
analogy. but that's a mile off. the situation is more
along the lines of this.. i would like nothing more than
for my primary interest to work out. as well as i know her
now, i think we have strong potential to go a long way,
and i think she'd be great for me.
but there are hints of her past around. i neglected to
mention something in my initial note that i really meant
to put in there.. one night at her place the answering
machine had a message on it from some old flame.. she
had mentioned his name. he left his number, and she
jotted it down. and my heart sank.
we've since talked about that, and about him. he is
history, i'm told. i have to believe her, if i'm going
to trust her. i can't let my old experience creep in
here and eat at me, because that's just too negative.
but late at night... it gets to me. it's getting better.
the longer i know her, the more i trust.
the way i've tried to handle the situation is as reply
.7 says - no rush, and stay loose. i don't want to push
anyone into anything.
and i know that the right thing to do is to forget about
#2. it's not as easy to do as it is to say, however. but
what i will do is stay away from her, and direct all at
primary. time will tell. it might not be right to hold a
spare in check.. but that's life sometimes. and if #1
thinks she wants to get exclusive, that's great with me,
and #2 will be the first to know.
you all think (except Mike) that i should make a choice
and either commit to #1 or drop the ball. have you ever
committed to someone, and had them string you along, and
leave you cold? I have. and #2 is one hell of a woman..
if she had made her thoughts known to me earlier i'm
sure we would be together now.
|
1293.10 | | MCIS5::BOURGAULT | | Tue Aug 18 1992 17:25 | 6 |
|
After reading the last reply from anon, my initial reaction was to
suggest, if it so difficult to stay away from #2 and that if #2 had
expressed interest earlier they'd be together, maybe he should be
concentrating on #2 instead of #1......
|
1293.12 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | rotate your tires, Cindy? | Tue Aug 18 1992 19:57 | 4 |
| .11> Why wait around trying to develop a succesful
.11> relationship with someone you don't know very well?
Maybe he finds #1 much more desirable than #2.
|
1293.13 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Why not ask why? | Wed Aug 19 1992 10:34 | 21 |
|
Often, what's most desirable is what's most comfortable for us,
even though it doesnt make a lot of sense - to ourselves or as seen
from another's point of view.
Perhaps the sure certainty that #2 offers is somehow an uncomfortable
situation for the basenoter - for reasons we cannot possibly understand
from our perspective - and therefore the un_certainty of the situation
offered by #1 is actually preferred.
We only know that the turmoil the basenoter is going through
over the conflict presented by this life-situation is uncomforting
- causing the basenoter to lose sleep at least one night.
We could only venture a guess as to why there is conflict in
the mind of the basenoter over this. Perhaps the basenoter doesnt
understand why more comfort is felt with #1, while logically, #2
is offering what "one would think would be" ultimately the more
comfortable situation.
Joe
|
1293.14 | obvious, but *I* just got it recently | SCHOOL::BOBBITT | double-click on 'get-a-life' | Wed Aug 19 1992 10:36 | 14 |
|
In affairs of the heart, do what you feel is best.
I have recently come to the realization that you must do what you feel
is right, in all situations, and then await the result. There *are* no
guarantees, no great signs, no formulas, no promises, that it will come
out as you wish.
Your intent, and your actions, are what you can alter.
The rest is up to fate.
-Jody
|
1293.15 | | KERNEL::COFFEYJ | unix causes brain fragmentation | Wed Aug 19 1992 13:57 | 27 |
| > do what you feel is best.
And if you really know what you really feel that's lucky. :-)
The rest of it, I'd say honesty is best but that doesn't always have to be
heavy. I *think* it's possible to express feelings close to the l word,
certainly with fidelity implications, in a light enough way, keeping it from
being just joking around but also without causing a rapid sprint in the
opposite direction.
Ok so some people will sprint at a hint whatever whenever but then I guess
by the sounds of things if that was the case then it might not be the right
situation for you anyway.
(Personally I think "I care about you enough for it to matter to me about
these things; I'd really like our relationship to be 'exclusive'" sounds
great so long as there's no tone of "I'm not having you keeping any of those
friends anymore" about it. On the assumption that you both have the same
understanding of exclusive that is :-)
Since you seem to be staying a little objective and didn't imply 'the L word'
I guess there's no call for correcting on how it's a doubtful kind of L word
if you'd still seriously consider no. 2.
|
1293.16 | | JUPITR::KAGNO | Mom to the Wrecking Crew | Wed Aug 19 1992 15:44 | 21 |
| I agree with .15. Why not state your feelings to #1, and if she can't
handle it, then she probably isn't right for you. I don't believe in
head games, and not being able to say what you feel for fear you will
drive that person away, to me, is a head game. I personally hate all
of the uncertainty that accompanies dating (does he like me? will he
call? etc.), and would much rather someone be honest and direct. That
way, I would know where I stand, he would know where he stands, and
each person can then decide what's best for them based on the
information they've just learned.
If #2 is a wonderful person and you both share the same goals and
values and would enhance each other, why not go for it? The biggest
problem with singles today is that no one wants a sure thing, even if
the sure thing would be the best thing that ever happened to them.
No wonder the divorce rate is so high! (I'm going through one, and
have learned from my mistakes.)
-Roberta
|
1293.17 | Basenoter replies | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Why not ask why? | Thu Aug 20 1992 15:23 | 53 |
|
The following reply is being posted anonymously for the basenoter -
Joe
* * *
It's not easy to explain my feelings about these 2 very
different people without sounding cold and calculating. but
without some explanation i can see people making assumptions
that don't fit.
#1 is approaching my ideal, and the more time we spend
together, the more i see of that.
#2 thinks that we would be great together. we've never done
more than have a few drinks out and talk. she is basing her
feelings on instinct, i suppose. she might be right. but
there's no real spark.
I know sparks fade. I guess you'll tell me that true love
grows, that mature love isn't based on physical attraction or
anything else that could be catorgorized as infatuation. but
things are developing between #1 and myself. the more time we
spend together the more we find in common. I find her
interested in things i never would have guessed.. things that i
have liked to do my whole life and never found a woman who'd
shown any interest. #2 would do these things with me too, but
for a different reason. she would be going along with it...
what is between #2 and me.. if i was still drifting with no
real special person in my life.. i know that i'd be with #2
now that she's presented her feelings, and i'm sure we'd be
further along with things than me and the other are right now.
but i think that love is growing between #1 and myself.
it has been progressing nicely since i first wrote. one thing i
gained from this note was that the right way to go is to
concentrate on one person at a time, that if you want more from
a relationship than just an occasional night out, then you've
made a decision. i haven't asked #1 to be exclusive. she is
soon to leave for a week's vacation away. i won't bring up
exclusivity prior to that. but i feel things shaping that way,
and don't find it necessary to use the words just now. someone
earlier in this string said that it's better to let the
feelings grow, and basically not to use the words too early. i
see that now.. the words would be shallow and hollow and
unnatural. the natural part is too much fun.
i was very confused when i started this note. your words have
helped me quite alot. i think i have a handle on my feelings
and i know i have people to bounce ideas off. thanks a bunch.
|
1293.18 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | Quayle in '94! | Sun Aug 23 1992 10:27 | 3 |
| Go for the spark.
If it fades, you'll have what you would've had anyway.
|
1293.19 | | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Thu Aug 27 1992 07:41 | 17 |
| I agree with Mike.. go for the spark...
but I question that the spark with #1 will not be enough either...
maybe neither #1 or #2 is right for you and you should be looking for
#3?
Its very difficult after being single for some time not to grasp at the
first opportunity that comes along and to "wish" it into something more
than it is... even more frustrating when two opportunities appear
together - a bit like buses eh?
I hope it works out with #1 for you, but I would have thought if that
"spark" was really there you wouldn't have these doubts..
Xtine
|
1293.20 | | HDLITE::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, Alpha P/PEG | Sun Aug 30 1992 07:49 | 2 |
| Men need the sparks. It's in our genes. There's nothing we can do
about it, we're simply slaves to nature. Woe is us.
|