T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1277.1 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | This time forever! | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:48 | 8 |
|
Learning to Whistle might help you. Not with the fingers, the
plain 'ol Mitch Miller kind. Maybe learning to play the Harmonica
might help in the same way.
Seriously...Just make sure your tunes come from the heart.
Joe
|
1277.2 | | VALKYR::RUST | | Wed Jul 01 1992 17:50 | 12 |
| Re .0: Was your osculatory relationship always this way, or did the
turning-away begin after some key event - say, the first kiss from Mr.
Kiss-Him-All-Day?
You might ask your wife if she can _demonstrate_ what she likes, since
she says she can't describe it. (This should be in the nature of a game
rather than a practical exam; lots of giggling and "oops, no, the other
way" should be part of the process. However, if she shows reluctance to
try this, you may have more serious problems to deal with than mere
technique...)
-b
|
1277.3 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, DEC/FXO | Wed Jul 01 1992 19:29 | 4 |
| "When he kissed me, I felt it in my KNEES! He must practice on
melons or something ..."
Annie Potts, in Pretty in Pink
|
1277.4 | | COMET::COSTA | Racers live faster and die harder | Wed Jul 01 1992 20:23 | 22 |
|
Well there is obviously more to it than just sticking your tongue into
somebody's mouth and wagging it around. I would second the suggest to
have her show you how she wants to be kissed.
Failing that, I suggest this; there is more to a mouth than just
tongues, slow down, explore it all a little bit. The gums, teeth, under
the tongue, everywhere. It all is a different experiance and each part
generates its own unique sensation. Also watch the amount of pressure
your putting on the lips. Heavy, ravaging kisses are good sometimes, but
not always. Just like a swimsuit leaves enough to the imagination to
make it sexy, so does a lightly placed kiss.
Remember, the tongue is a muscle, and like any other muscle in your
body, must be exercised to be good at what it is doing. Sunflower seeds
are a good way to practice limbering that sucker up without people
thinking your weird. Pop a few in your mouth, shell and all, shell
them, eat them, and store the shell on the side of your mouth. This is
a real easy way to teach that ol tongue how to work its way around just
about anything!
TC
|
1277.5 | "Kiss me Deadly" | DNEAST::HEBERT_SANDR | | Thu Jul 02 1992 00:39 | 7 |
| hey have you ever tried to kiss with out involving your tongue
in someone elses mouth. How about trying this. Try kissing her with
your lips slightly closed and nibbling lightly on her bottom lip
and moving on from there. I know that when someone nibbles on my
lip while kissing it just brings me to my knees.
__SH
|
1277.6 | | SENIOR::JANDROW | The Green-Eyed Lady | Thu Jul 02 1992 08:35 | 5 |
|
Nibbling and "tickling" (with your tongue) are good. Very good......
|
1277.7 | | ASDS::BARLOW | i THINK i can, i THINK i can... | Thu Jul 02 1992 10:28 | 15 |
|
I would suggest that for the moment you not worry about technique.
The unfortunate thing about kissing is that it is not a definable
process. In a "c" program, there is a definite sequence with maybe
a couple of optional paths to the exit() statement. Kissing is
different. I think you should think about kissing as an extention of
your emotions. If you think she's very sweet at the moment then kiss
her like she's a sweet fruit that you're tasting. If on the other
hand, this is a very sexually charged situation then let out that
animal side otherwise known as passion. It's a bit more like biting
into an apple than eating a peach. Rougher and more intense. (but
leave the teeth out of it for the moment - that takes experience.)
(boy what an embarrassing thing to describe)
|
1277.8 | | VMSZOO::ECKERT | All dressed up to go dreaming | Thu Jul 02 1992 10:38 | 3 |
| Something just doesn't seem right here. If your wife turns away when
you attempt to kiss her I think the problem is likely to be much more
serious than your kissing technique.
|
1277.9 | | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | This time forever! | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:07 | 54 |
|
My first reply to this was to help you out with what you percieve
as a inadequacy of some sort - a shortcoming you have. I do not
wish to invalidate your feelings about it, rather, I'd like to explore
just how you arrived to feeling this way.
Your wife rejects your advances (i.e. "turns her head"), tells
you of how she "could" be physically intimate with another man for
sustained periods (i.e. "all day") and has apparently admitted to
taking part in an action most would consider *totally inappropriate*
for a married person; "HE did it" (i.e. to me).
I realize some marriages are more "open" than others; it's okay
between the married couple for each of them to, er, "take on" others
from time to time. Is this your situation? Do *you* feel that it's
appropriate for your wife to be "making out" with some other man?
If you feel that it's wrong for her to have done this, would you
be able to stand up to her with an assertion that *she's* simply
wrong, wrong, wrong in this matter?
What I'm getting at is that there's NOTHING WRONG WITH YOU!
This isnt about some "deficiency" or "shortcoming" of *yours*, that
if you can somehow "perform better", if you can "get it right", all
will be well. For Gods's sakes, two 12 year olds can get kissing
right, if both are willing to explore a little. This is more about
your marriage and what's going on with your wife that she's rejecting
you and hurting you and she's apparently been dis-functional enough
to take action outside of the marriage to satisfy her needs - or to
be able to even indicate she having a problem of some sort.
A fully functional and emotionally healthy person, operating
within the context of marriage, has comitted to maintaining a clear
communication with their partner and to work out any and all problems
they may have - *with* their partner! They dont beat up their partner
emotionally; get 'em to a point where they feel totally inadequate
and then slam their trust into the ground by openly admitting they
"cheated" on them!! That's the behavior of a rather sick person,
one who isnt functionally healthy enough to even be in a marriage, IMHO.
Instead of feeling "inadequate", I can easily imagine instead
feeling *violated*. You'd have every right to feel that way,
considering what she's done to you. If this woman doesnt like the
way you kiss, why did she *marry you*? You might consider telling
her to either shape up regarding what marriage means, or get the
h*ll out of it. There's plenty of others out there in this world
who'd be _glad_ to work with you on *whatever* issues may come up,
in a comitted monagamous relationship called "marriage". There's
nothing "wrong" with you, that I can see, and you should know that.
Hope this helps,
Joe
|
1277.10 | Sloppy wet kisses are a no no | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | The BOSS! | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:16 | 7 |
| there is nothing more gross than "wet" kisses where you are drenched in
spit. I know that is really crude, but most of the guys I have met
kiss like that until "trained". It is awful. Even my husband is
slowly digressing from nice kisses to gross wet kisses so I'll have to
"train" him back!
Tammi
|
1277.11 | Huh? | LJOHUB::GODIN | If life gives scraps, make quilts | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:23 | 9 |
| Ah, I've reread the base note and wonder if some of us aren't jumping
to conclusions? The base noter will have to clarify if, in fact, the
other man who could kiss so well was pre-marriage or a post-marriage
affair.
I read the base note in the former way; others have obviously read it
the latter.
Karen
|
1277.12 | | TNPUBS::C_MILLER | | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:32 | 2 |
| Bravo .10!!!! Nothing worse than smooching and needing a roll of Bounty
to sop up the extra...
|
1277.13 | Pucker up, er, pucker down; how about sideways? | WLDWST::WARD_FR | Seeking more mystical adventure | Thu Jul 02 1992 11:51 | 57 |
| re: .11
I agree. Joe was over-reacting, it seems to me.
You *can* learn techniques, unquestionably. Similar to
me in my massage experience. I originally (back in 1979) went
to massage school to be a more competent lover. I know, I know,
I feel a little embarassed to say so, but what the heck. It's the
truth. I felt that I had been inadequate with my wife and that
perhaps if I had been a better lover she wouldn't have left me.
So, I thought about it a lot and the conclusion I reached was that
going to massage school would virtually ensure me that "no other
man would touch better." Well, parts of this are valid, and other
parts of this are "horse pucky." My love-making had not been
bad; my wife left me for other reasons. My feelings of inadequacy
were what I had to contend with, not my love-making.
In the ensuing 13 years, I've learned a great deal. ;-)
Anyway, the point is that I feel that my touch techniques have been
extremely helpful and useful in romantic situations. But there has
yet been a romantic relationship in my life that has survived using
*only* touching skills. Relationships are far more complex or
intricate than that. What is especially true is how many women I
have met who have told me that various other men in there lives are
"mechanically great" (that is, they know sexual techniques, etc.) but
are lousy lovers anyway. Watch a porno film sometime. Some of those
films depict very mechanical acts of sex. Most women I've known don't
relate to that very well. On the other hand, the sexual mastery has
never been as important to them as the connection, the intimacy, the
communication at the soul-level. Lots of men don't want to admit it
and lots of other men are reluctant to look, but usually most men will
discover that this criteria holds up for them, too. In other words,
usually the best relationships are not the ones with the best sex but
rather the ones with the closest intimacy.
How this relates to the question at hand, that is, kissing, to me
is as follows. Yes, definitely look at your kissing style. Different
people need to find whatever comes together for them--uniquely. Doing
what someone else does is not likely to work for you. Are your lips
rigid or extremely pliable and soft? Is your mouth dry or wet? Are
you pressing too hard or not hard enough? Are you totally covering
your partner's mouth or not covering enough? Is your mouth a giant
cavern or an impenetrable fortress?
But the most important thing, in my view, is, where is your heart
in all of this? How connected do you feel? How much do you love that
person and how much do you want to please them? How open are you to
receiving from them whatever gift of love they are offering you?
How vulnerable are you allowing yourself to be? How strong is the
intimacy in the bond between you--can you share and communicate
honestly (tactfully) and openly?
You will probably find that, as Joe might have suggested instead
of indicated, that there are some other issues between you other than
kissing technique. If you are determined, you can work this out.
At the least, you can recover your own self-esteem and self-respect
and make other decisions in regards to the union you have currently
chosen.
Frederick
|
1277.14 | | ASDS::BARLOW | i THINK i can, i THINK i can... | Thu Jul 02 1992 16:21 | 19 |
|
I think it may be unfair to jump all over his wife for expressing
her dissatisfaction. After all, you must first identify a problem
before fixing it. In addition, his kissing may have changed since
when they were dating. I firmly believe that line from the song
"you can feel it in his kiss". So, if one is feeling distant from
one's partner or trying to not be vulnerable to ones partner, then
one's kiss would reflect that : ie the impenatrable fortress mouth
mentioned earlier. It is so important for passion to stay alive in
a relationship so I think this issue is worth investing alot of
energy in.
An odd question which seems to fit in this string : do men out
there think that french kissing is phalic and that the woman's
tongue should therefore not leave her mouth? Is this move considered
discustingly aggressive? (thanks for any answers on this.)
|
1277.15 | | VMSZOO::ECKERT | All dressed up to go dreaming | Thu Jul 02 1992 16:51 | 9 |
| re: .14
> An odd question which seems to fit in this string : do men out
> there think that french kissing is phalic and that the woman's
> tongue should therefore not leave her mouth? Is this move considered
> discustingly aggressive? (thanks for any answers on this.)
I disagree on both points. Did some guy actually tell you this?
|
1277.16 | | ASDS::BARLOW | i THINK i can, i THINK i can... | Thu Jul 02 1992 17:26 | 11 |
|
>Did some guy actually tell you this?
yes, he told me I was not feminine for attempting to kiss him with
anything more than with very tip of my tongue. That's why I'm
curious if this is normal or if this man is homophobic.
thanks for the answer
|
1277.17 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | Seeking the Philosopher's Stone | Thu Jul 02 1992 17:46 | 1 |
| re -1: homophobic? Naah -- A total dork? Yeah, that's it!
|
1277.18 | La boca tiene mucho valor. | WLDWST::WARD_FR | Seeking more mystical adventure | Thu Jul 02 1992 18:43 | 15 |
| re: .16
You should work at being a *person* first, and not worry
about gender roles. What someone did to you (as they have done
to all of us all over the place) is to attempt to identify you
and your role by your gender.
If you feel it, express it--just
be appropriate and honest. There is no "proper" place for a
man's tongue versus a woman's tongue. There just is...
Clearly the genitals limit us to certain "genital placements"
;-}, but the tongue, contrary to what books such as "Candy" might
toy with, is not defined by gender limitations.
Frederick
|
1277.19 | | VMSZOO::ECKERT | All dressed up to go dreaming | Thu Jul 02 1992 21:59 | 9 |
| re: .16
I don't know if I'd go so far as to deduce that the man in question
is homophobic, but I do disagree strongly with his opinion.
If I were french kissing a woman and noticed that she responded
only with the tip of her tongue I'd wonder if she felt my actions
were too intrusive or aggressive in that particular situation
and would probably back off to approximate her level of response.
|
1277.20 | | SCHOOL::BOBBITT | ruthless compassion | Fri Jul 03 1992 09:09 | 12 |
|
maybe I missed something in the discussion. Has he asked her for
feedback and coaching on how to kiss in a way that invites her to ask
for what she wishes? Has she given this feedback and have they tried
to work on it? I've met some kissers with *really* loose mouths (like
dead fish - ick!), and some kissers who use *too* much tongue, but if I
was really committed to being in a relationship with them I'd express
to them what didn't work for me, and we'd hopefully be able to work on
it til it did. Has this happened yet?
-Jody
|
1277.21 | not the whole story... | YUPPY::CARTER | Windows on the world... | Mon Jul 06 1992 09:24 | 25 |
| Kissin is a very intimate thing - perhaps more intimate even than sex?
I have heard that prostitues will not kiss clients for example..
In my experience, when a relationship is going downhill the first thing
that stops is the kissing, probably before the sex.
It is a very cruel and hurtful thing to compare a current partner with
a previous one on such a sensitive issue. I would question a
relationship where one partner can be so insensitive.
It sounds to me like she is deliberately trying to hurt you - or is she
feeling guilty, or wanting to split up, and is trying to push you into
reacting - maybe she feels you are too "soft" and is trying to provoke
a reaction.
Maybe there IS something about your kissing she doesn't like, but she
should be talking to YOU about YOU, not about some other person.
If I were you I wouldn't worry about your technique, as others have
said here - find out what is behind her cruelty.
Xtine
|
1277.22 | 2 cents worth.... | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | Ride the Painted Pony | Mon Jul 06 1992 16:36 | 5 |
| Dont worry about being inadequate.....just do it and have fun!!!
Ask her why she turns her head. Some people dont like to 'make out',
maybe a past experience?
|
1277.23 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, DEC/FXO | Wed Jul 08 1992 00:18 | 9 |
| Some things to avoid.
1. Do not lick her face.
2. Do not blow into her mouth to get her to make a raspberry.
3. Do not suck the air out of her mouth to get her to snort.
4. Do not bite her tongue.
|
1277.24 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Wed Jul 08 1992 01:56 | 5 |
| re-.1
Passing her your gum is usually a bad idea too. 8^)
-j
|
1277.25 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | Michael Zarlenga, DEC/FXO | Wed Jul 08 1992 02:46 | 1 |
| Likewise, anything the consistency of gum ...
|
1277.26 | Two mouths in love--no boundaries, just frontiers. | WLDWST::WARD_FR | Seeking more mystical adventure | Wed Jul 08 1992 12:54 | 23 |
| ...but on the other hand, if ecstasy is part of your idea of fun,
then, when you find that person whose mouth stratospherically propels
your emotions into realms perhaps previously unattainable, notice
the union, notice the chemistry, notice the kaleidoscopic entertwining
of souls as passions reach inward into depths unfathomable. There
comes a bonding so magnetic that it seems almost impossible to
separate. The surrounding world disappears and the greatest importance
is that which tingles all the sensory endings of the anatomy which
is pressing into and exploring the analagous portions of the other's.
The prime directive screams, "More, more, more!" as the fusing and
fission lead to yet another level of fusion. Two mouths, matched
in passion, can explode and implode into a delight so strong that
almost nothing seems to want to supercede it. If and when and however
often it happens that the equally motivated and empassioned mouth
finds yours, prepare yourself for a sensory smorgasbord of rabid,
hedonistic ecstasy synergistically building into a frenzy of love.
When it happens, there isn't a whole lot that compares to it.
Going beyond isn't anathema, of course, but neither is it compulsory.
Frederick
|
1277.27 | | SCHOOL::BOBBITT | ruthless compassion | Wed Jul 08 1992 14:25 | 7 |
|
A kiss, accompanied by the proper chemistry, can easily yield that
hormonal sweep in 10 seconds or less.
re: .26 - Bravo, well captured!
-Jody
|
1277.28 | | ASDS::BARLOW | i THINK i can, i THINK i can... | Thu Jul 09 1992 09:51 | 5 |
|
re: .26 - oh my. You MUST be a writer.
Rachael
|
1277.29 | ...more than just flesh... | WLDWST::WARD_FR | Seeking more mystical adventure | Thu Jul 09 1992 11:42 | 9 |
| re: .27, .28
Thanks. It was fun to write because I had to remember what a few
of those passionate moments had been like...and how I wish that they
had continued. (And, parenthetically, how I wish I had them available
to me now. ;-} )
Frederick
|
1277.30 | THANK YOU! | USCTR1::JHERNBERG | | Mon Nov 23 1992 15:31 | 9 |
|
.26
I just finshed your note.....sigh-h-h-h-h-h!...guys, are you out
listening (reading) this.....}-)...it would melt a heart (lips,too)
of stone!!!
THANK YOU!
|