[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | What's all this fuss about 'sax and violins'? |
Notice: | Archived V1 - Current conference is QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS |
Moderator: | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI |
|
Created: | Fri May 09 1986 |
Last Modified: | Wed Jun 26 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1327 |
Total number of notes: | 28298 |
1264.0. "Love and maturity -- "Love Test"" by ZPOVC::INDO01::AVN5 (A Buddhist novice) Thu May 21 1992 11:56
Hi,
I recently read an interesting book titled "Love Test". The author is
Harold Bessel, Ph.D, a psychologyst from USA. In his book he proposes
that a love relationship between two people consists of two important
aspects:
1. Romantic Attraction
This is the "chemical". It is a biopsychological force that exists
between two people who are attracted to each other. It either exists
or not exists; if it exists nothing can make it vanish, and vice
versa, if it doesn't, nothing can invite it. Certainly, there is a
borderline cases, where it is there but "just there".
2. Emotional Maturity
Bessel thinks this is more important. It is the degree of how far
can a person adapts to many situations and solves his/her problems.
It consists of:
- awareness
- ability to relate with others
- competence
- integrity
Bessel regards this as more important as many cases happen that the
romantic attraction does exist but the people are so immature that
they think they are not meant for each other.
So, in Bessel's proposal, an ideal couple is the one that has strong
romantic attraction, and the parties involved are reasonably mature
people.
I like this idea, and do think this is a solid argumentation. Any
comments on this?
Regards,
Fung Siong - Indonesia
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1264.1 | | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu May 21 1992 13:41 | 11 |
| Fung Siong,
There's an old saying, "The Greeks had a word for it."
In this case, the Greeks had two words. Concept 1 is expressed as
"eros", and concept 2 is expressed as "agape". Both translate into
English (loosely) as "love".
I've come to the conclusion that truelove requires both.
Ann B.
|
1264.2 | Can "love" be invented, then? | ZPOVC::INDO01::AVN5 | A Buddhist novice | Wed May 27 1992 09:43 | 10 |
| One point to mention about Bessel's theory: there is no way we can
"create/invent" love if the chemical is not there. However, I also hear
many people say that love can grow from casual friendship, if there is
sufficient care and attention between the couple involved. Does it mean
that two people who relate often, although at first there is no
romantic attraction involved, may eventually fall in love with each
other? Or is it just a "buried love" just discovered after a long
association?
Fung Siong 8-)
|