T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1235.1 | | CSLALL::DOUGHERTY | More than words can say... | Wed Feb 12 1992 11:44 | 7 |
| I don't think you should worry so much about what a woman is looking
for as much as you should zero in on what YOU want. Know what YOU want
from a relationship, and then look for it. Have you tried the SINGLES
file??
FWIW...
|
1235.2 | Start from within. | ESKIMO::TRAVIS | | Wed Feb 12 1992 12:45 | 13 |
| Start from within. If there is someone somewhere in your
life that is interesting, how do YOU feel about her? Don't
go getting yourself caught up in what you think her
expectations are and how she's going to judge you. Love
is an emotion and it can happen at a place you won't
expect. When that special woman enters your life you
probably won't feel like you are trying, things will seem
relatively natural. Your feelings will take it from there.
This is just based on my own experience. Hope it helps.
Bill
|
1235.3 | | BSS::VANFLEET | Hold on for one more day | Wed Feb 12 1992 13:59 | 10 |
| Something that might help is to remember that like attracts like. I'd
advise you to not only decide what you want in another person but also
to start working on being the person who will attract those qualities.
If you want someone with great personal integrity, then examine yours
and see if there is anything you want to do to improve that. Become
the person that your ideal mate will be attracted to.
FWIW,
Nanci
|
1235.4 | "Invest in female friends" | BAGELS::HAYWARD | | Wed Feb 12 1992 16:32 | 25 |
| Base noter:
I don't think you can really be in love with someone 'til you get to
know them. Have you been attracted to women but not pursued it? I
am 28 and am attracted to men who have similar interests to my own.
I generally take the initiative and ask a guy out. Of course several
good men have slipped through my fingers when I didn't. You should
take the initiative and ask someone out simply because you like their
smile or the way they laugh, etc. By knowing more about women, and
how to relate to them I'm sure you'll soon find what you're looking for.
I would suggest you examine the more non-threatening methods of meeting
people and getting involved in group activities. Some activities you
can find a person you're interested in and ask her if she'd like to
join you afterwards for a drink or coke or whatever. I think you'll
find power in groups because you won't be put on the spot.
I have a friend who was in the same spot- he was 27 and never been
kissed. He joined the TOGETHER dating service, found a woman, married
her and they are now expecting their first child. I believe there is
someone for everyone, but you can't expect her to come to you, you have
to go find her!!
Good luck!
Tami
|
1235.5 | At 28 I was still a "baby" in lots of ways... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Making life a mystical adventure | Thu Feb 13 1992 10:10 | 18 |
| re: .0
There is some good advice in the previous replies...(and you
might even turn your "virgin" status into a useful asset--in this
day of AIDS...)
The thing that caught my eye was "should I wait for love?"
My short answer is "no." Love and relationships take practice...
and very few people know how to do it...and there is no such thing
as perfection, anyway, and who'd want it...but, anyway, sitting around
waiting is a decision to "react" rather than a decision to "act."
So, if no one ever rings your doorbell you'll never step outside?
Won't you ever ring someone else's doorbell? Maybe no one is home,
or maybe they'll turn you away, but at least you are taking charge of
your own life. Maybe they'll invite you in for cookies or something...
Nah, don't wait. Don't demand, but don't wait...
Frederick
|
1235.6 | Some adult standards | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | This time forever! | Thu Feb 13 1992 16:50 | 44 |
|
Yes, there are "standards" for someone almost 30 and I'm sure
you _can_ live up to them! I'll share some here; these belong
to my fiance' and she sent them to me a couple years ago. They're
pretty much self explanatory. Hope this helps -
Joe
Someone who lives life in a positive vein and find the good
in things.
Someone who is trustworthy, honest, open and willing to share.
Someone who can recognize in me things I like about myself and
like them too.
Someone willing to give me their opinions and advice and listen
to mine.
Someone who is willing to learn and grow and encourages these
same things in me.
Someone who is able to tell me what they want and need from
me.
Someone who will take my thoughts and feelings into account
and recognize when needs and expectations I have are reasonable
and need to be tended to.
Someone who means what they say and says what they mean.
Someone who can be a seperate person and know where he ends and
I begin.
Someone who known that I'm imperfect, that they're imperfect
and can help create an environment where that's okay and accepted.
Someone who would not like to control me, dominate me, change
me or make me into what they want.
Someone who respects me and lives life in such a way that I can
respect them.
Someone who believes that Love is an action and acts accordingly.
|
1235.7 | Have a Coke and a smile... | SWAM1::WALTON_MI | | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:32 | 40 |
| I think this last note probably has the most to offer. Most women I
know by the time they near 30 know enough to not expect to much as far
as "experience = good technique". It's just not true!!!!!!! I have
been with men who have gotten around quite a bit but have no style or
concern for what's happening with me. The quality that seems to come
with intimacy is just that. Being intimate. Caring, paying attention,
taking time to make sure that you are giving the other person what they
want. Every woman is different. They may act similiar over dinner but
in a very quiet personal moment they are going to be different.
Neither do I know a woman who expects the first few times with someone
new to be great. There is going to be a nervousness on both parts.
That's one of the things that make it fun. The tension and then the
release.
As far as your nerves go, get use to it. It doesn't really go away it
just changes form. Sometimes I'll go out with someone new and it's
just another evening out with a friend. Other times I start acting
like I'm in high school and will spend 4 hours getting dressed. (I'm
now 32.) I've decided that I will never be "sophisticated" enough to
take it too casually nor do I want to be. It keeps things for me
interesting and makes it fun.
One thing I do recommend strongly is develop a sense of humor about
this all early on. The lovers I will always remember and still miss
the most are the ones who knew how to laugh the whole way through. One
guy would just stop everything to tell a joke. He was to me a great
lover. This would probably drive some women crazy but I loved it.
Things will not always turn out OK. Some nights things may seem like a
good idea but nothing happens. Don't sweat it. There are a lot more
nights to be had. Being able to make someone smile on a night like
this will endear them to you. People want to be happy and have a good
time. If you can help them find this you'll be better off than most.
Hope this helps.
Good luck,
Michelle
|
1235.8 | yup, nothing like a smile | ROYALT::NIKOLOFF | Ruby-JOY | Tue Feb 18 1992 12:41 | 9 |
| >> The lovers I will always remember and still miss
>> the most are the ones who knew how to laugh the whole way through. One
Oh, Michelle I agree completely! It is so nice to look back and
remember someone with a sense of humor.. it's like icing on a cake.
Mikki &^)
|
1235.9 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:12 | 11 |
| Coincidentally enough, there was a recent Miss Manners column on much the same
issue. A 29-year-old "inexperienced" man was wondering, if he should happen
to find himself kissing a woman, whether he should admit to her that his
"lack of technique" was due to inexperience. Miss Manners replied that he
should not do so, and let the woman presume that it's the novelty of kissing
HER and his interest in doing so that is responsible.
Besides, any woman who would think less of a man because of "inexperience"
is probably not worth experiencing....
Steve
|
1235.10 | meet more people... and more... and more.. | ARRODS::CARTER | An anonymous cog... | Tue Feb 18 1992 13:51 | 33 |
| I would also support the view that you should not "sit back and wait"
for love to happen...
If I was you I would try a dating agency... one major advantage of this
is that you are then meeting people with similar aims - they want a
relationship... if you can avoid trying to make EVERY one you meet a
bigf deal, and remember that if this one isn't "Miss Right" the next
one on your list might be, then that takes a lot of pressure off.
A lot of my friends are in a similar position to you, around the 30
mark and single... and the one thing that is definite is that the more
peoplethey meet the more likely they are to meet someone...
I started a social club last year - a sub-group of a UK-wide
organisation... its a great idea for meeting people of both sexes in a
non-threatening way... and the organisation of it kept me so busy
Ididn't notice I was single...
If you'd like details of how to set it up send me mail...
The other thing to do is to let on to your friends that you would like
to meet someone... not for them to organise a blind date - but so that
you can meet more people...
The answer is to increase your social circle of both sexes... for sure,
the sister of a friend, the friend of a friend of a friend... etc
etc... once you are comfortable in female company the rest will
follow...
Xtine
|
1235.11 | You have more company than you would think | QUARK::MODERATOR | | Fri Feb 21 1992 13:12 | 60 |
| The following reply has been contributed by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by
mail, please send your message to QUARK::MODERATOR, specifying the
conference name and note number. Your message will be forwarded with
your name attached unless you request otherwise.
Steve
I'm not a reader of Human_Relations. I was pointed here by a close
friend and I think I can add something to this discussion.
I'm a 26 year old man, and I feel I can at least sympathize with the
base noter, since I'm in the same situation. As a person I'm friendly,
intelligent, well dressed, tall, reasonably attractive, and have
friends of both sexes. However, I have a shy streak, particularly
around women to whom I'm attracted, so dating has been hard for me.
I've never fallen in love or had a relationship. My shyness was
increased by attending a technical college, which are tough places to
be a young adult.
When you're shy, you may hear people say that you're overreacting and
simply need to be more assertive. They simply do not understand that
shyness creates barriers as real and hard as walls. It also hurts to
hear this very real barrier downplayed by others.
Our society has a myth that men must be experienced, and pushes men
into a role that some are not able to fill. This pressure comes from
all directions, society, friends, even parents. Two years ago, I read
a book titled "Male Sexuality" which had an interesting statistic. An
anonymous poll showed that at age 21, 22% of men are inexperienced.
However, the number is much lower (something like 1%) when asked in an
interview. This means some men are lying to avoid admission that they
don't measure up to a myth. The result is that an inexperienced man
feels alone and an oddity. Feeling inadequate doesn't help one's
self-esteem and can feed shyness.
I don't know if you're shy, but if you are a good book to read is
"Shyness" by Zimbardo. He is a Psychologist at Stanford, and has done
research on what he refers to as the silent prison of shyness. It has a
section of exercises which can help someone break out and meet people.
A good technique is risk taking. Each week you must do one thing which
is a social risk. At first these can be simple, later they must be
more complex and things you wouldn't have done before.
I tried this technique with dating and it has helped. I've joined a
few clubs and I'm meeting more people. I've managed a few dates over
the past year, but that is still hard. I'm currently in an odd
situation, I can strike up a conversation, but once I consider
suggesting a date, I start to stammer, unable to think past the
self-feeding anxiety. If I'm on a date, I have to suppress my feelings
of attraction in order to avoid feeling shy.
Being inexperienced is not wrong, it is not an affliction in need of a
cure. But it will be a barrier if you let it.
|
1235.12 | | BRADOR::HATASHITA | Hard wear engineer | Fri Feb 21 1992 15:25 | 7 |
| > I'm currently in an odd
> situation, I can strike up a conversation, but once I consider
> suggesting a date, I start to stammer, unable to think past the
> self-feeding anxiety.
This is not an odd situation. This is standard operating procedure.
If it becomes a real bother simply wait for her to suggest the date.
|
1235.13 | ... or send her E-mail. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Feb 21 1992 16:33 | 3 |
| It's worked on me!
Ann B.
|
1235.14 | Always look 'em in the eye | SWAM1::WALTON_MI | | Mon Feb 24 1992 14:19 | 42 |
| How about a non-date? If she mentions something tha she's interested
in maybe organize a group and invite her along to whatever. Even if
she doesn't go you'll be with friends and have a good time.
As far as the shyness, can I ever relate. No one I know now believes
me when I tell them how shy I was. I never looked anyone in the eye
and would go days without speaking to a soul, except maybe to the clown
at Jack in the Box. When I was about 19 or 20 it hit me that people
were misinterpreting my shyness as something else. I decided to make
some hard changes. I watched people that I thought of as outgoing and
started to mimic some of their behaviors. Heart pounding, palms
sweating, knees shaking, unable to hear anything they were saying, I
would smile make eye contact, say good morning and how was their
weekend. Before you know it I started seeing the shyness in them and I
became much more comfortable. I think because I wanted to make them
feel more comfortable since I knew what they were going through. When
you get so caught up in looking at the ground and avoiding people out
of fear you can't see that they are just human and that they are afraid
too. Everyone is shy and some point. Some more than others. I'm not
trying to say that changing is easy. It's the hardest thing I ever did
and I've had quite a life. But the rewards have been many and the
thing people mention that they like about me the most after we get to
know it each other, is that I put them at ease. I make them feel
comfortable to be who they are. I let them forget about their shyness
for awhile.
You can do this too. You will be amazed at the personal power that you
actually have. People respond in a very strong and positive way to
those who acknowledge their power without abusing it. I'm sure this
happens at a sub-conscious level but start watching those around you.
See who has the most personal power and who is able to get along with
the most people. This will probably be the same person.
One thing I learned over the 8-10 years it took to "come out" of the
shyness closet it that I expected relationships to be there whenever I
wanted them. I was assuming the entire problem was mine. Wrong. I
didn't take into account that other people have their own problems that
keep them from getting involved in all types of relationships. After I
stopped taking total responsibility I felt a lot better and more
relaxed.
|
1235.15 | Reply from anonymous author of base note | QUARK::MODERATOR | | Mon Feb 24 1992 15:39 | 54 |
| Hello,
Here's the base-noter again.
I would like to thank all those who responded to this note, especially the
reply of the 26-year-old man in a similar position to mine. How I can relate
to that! You describe my situation perfectly, and it makes me feel a little
less bad about myself. This by the way applies also to a lot of other replies
(and off-line MAIL), there's not only food for thought and good advice but
also words of encouragement. Thanks to all of you for that.
Some of the things I've learned so far from these replies/mails is that it's
not expected to be 'good' at first, and that it's "Standard Procedure" to be
nervous etc. Please note that TV may well have had a devastating effect on my
picture of reality. But I also learned that I wil have to take action myself.
I had already tried a dating agency, not one of those marriage bureaus but a
'blind date'-sort of setup. I think I picked the wrong one because they never
managed to arrange a date with someone with similar interests, if they succeed
in getting me a date at all. For some reason I think that continuing this is
not a good idea, I only feel bad after one of those 'forced' evenings out,
where both her and me are being polite while we discover that neither has any
common interests with the other. So I think I'll quit my subscription there,
and concentrate on meeting women myself, but....
.....but still remains the matter of, if I may call it that way, availability.
Reply number 4 asks if I ever was attracted to women and not pursued it. Well
I sometimes feel attracted, but so far the women in question were always
involved in a relationship already, or even married. In fact there is one I
would immediately ask out if she wasn't engaged already. She's a good friend
of mine, though she probably does not know how I feel about her, and last week
she invited me to her planned wedding in a few months......
If I meet someone that I like, I can't help but ask myself if she is free or
not. I try to find out, but I don't dare ask straight, or even through a
detour, in fear it sounds like a hidden request for intimacy... I hope this is
clear, my English vocabulary needs some refinement in the human_relations
field. But this is one of my problems since, given my age etc, I feel the urge
to quickly get a girlfriend, so I feel I should not 'waste my time'. I know, I
know, this is not the right way to think, and with my brains I know it's not
right, but it's also a matter of feelings.... this makes it all so
complicated.
Thanks for the statistics of the questionnaire. I must admit that when asked I
also lie about my experience. I had also read that girls in the U.S.A. have
their first intercourse experience at (average) 16.5 year! It's figures like
those that make me feel inadequate.... but again this note has generated
enough evidence that I should not let myself guide by this kind of
information. What I need, I think, is a reality check. Which all of you are
giving me right now. Thanks for that, and please keep the good advice coming
in! I think that posting this note is one of the best things I have done so
far this year :-).
Yes, I CAN and WILL keep smiling, no matter what.....!
|
1235.16 | Be careful of stats, they lie | SWAM1::WALTON_MI | | Mon Feb 24 1992 17:23 | 49 |
| Don't get so nervous about girls starting so early. These numbers are
often deceiving. For instance many women in the mid-west, rural areas,
etc. get married and start having children at 17 or 18. This skews the
number quite a bit.
The other piece of information that is rarely listed with these
statistics is how many of those who experienced intercouse and/or first
sexual experience (depending on how the survey is written) did so of
their own free will. It is now estimated that 1 out of every 5-6 women
was sexually abused by the time they turned 18. This part is usually
dropped off because it makes most people uncomfortable but it changes
the numbers quite a bit more than most might think.
For instance there are 100 women you know. 20 of these were abused
around the age of 6, a common age for abuse. 15 of these abuses
included intercourse of some sort. The other 5 engaged in intercourse
around 16, again fairly average for abused kids to start having sex
early. Of the last 80, 6 were married and/or involved at 18. 20 had
their first encounter at 20. Another 20 started at 22. Another 25
started at 25. The last 9 wait until age 30. The average age for this
group is 19 but only 26 had actually started by this age. The last 74
waited until later. With 9 of them being older than you are now.
Statistics are created to serve someone's need. To sell birth control,
to get a conservative politician elected, to get them something that
they want. Without all the numbers this info is useless.
Besides all that I'm glad you've got an optimistic view point. There
are also quite a few suptle ways of asking someone if they're involved
and you might be surprised at the number of women who are wondering the
same thing about you. You might try just slipping in somewhere that
you are not involved at the moment. For instance when talking about
the overtime that you are required to put in our your ability to travel
or whatever. The lack of a relationship in your life right now gives
you that freedom but "you'd sure like to have someone to take with you
on your journeys". This tack can be especially easy to use if she's
complaining about the number of hours she has to work or the lack of
time she has or mentions something she would like to get involved with
except for the time constraints. (Don't let these complaints stop you
from asking her out. If she likes you she'll make time. If she's not
ready this gives you both a pleasant way out.) Ask her if her
family/boyfriend what ever minds all this time gone or if this workload
has put a strain on her personal relationships. You'll get a better
feel for who she is and find out her status at the same time.
Just remember you're not alone, just lonely and that's temporary.
Right now it sounds veryyyyyy temporary.
|
1235.17 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | brrrrrrrritzky! | Mon Feb 24 1992 19:14 | 8 |
| .16> -< Be careful of stats, they lie >-
There aren't many 28 year old virgins around, either men or women.
I'd guess that less than 5% of the 28-year olds in America are
virgins, no more.
That might change in the next decade, what with AIDS.
|
1235.18 | | STARCH::WHALEN | Vague clouds of electrons tunneling through computer circuits an | Mon Feb 24 1992 20:43 | 12 |
| The idea of falling in love exists primarily in fiction. What happens
with relationships that work is that a friendship develops and never
stops growing.
What you should be wary of is falling in lust, because then your
hormones may drag you into a relationship that isn't good for you.
Do things that you like to do in groups so that you have the ability to
make new friends. You'll eventually come across a friendship that
means something special to you.
Rich
|
1235.19 | | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | brrrrrrrritzky! | Tue Feb 25 1992 19:40 | 5 |
| I'm not so sure of that, Rich.
One time, when I fell in love, it was quite magnificaent and immediate.
And mutual.
|
1235.20 | Responsibility is not blame... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Making life a mystical adventure | Wed Feb 26 1992 11:05 | 13 |
| re: .14 (Michelle)
"After I stopped taking responsibility I felt much better and totally
relaxed..."
I won't argue with your feelings, but I would like to suggest that
what you were giving up was not responsibility, rather it was
blame/shame (self blame and shame surrounding yourself.) In fact, it
was only *after* you took responsibility for your situation that you
sought out changes that enabled you to move on...
Frederick
|
1235.21 | | CFSCTC::GLIDEWELL | Wow! It's The Abyss! | Sat Feb 29 1992 00:22 | 93 |
| > please keep the good advice coming in!
Hi There, Basenoter,
Many good comments have been posted, and since you're open to
hearing more, I'd like to make a few comments and suggestions.
> girls in the U.S.A. have their first intercourse experience at
> (average) 16.5 year! It's figures like those that make me
> feel inadequate....
Those figures are based on the entire population. The average
age of first intercourse increases as one moves up the
socio-economic ladder. Simply from the way you express yourself,
I assume you're quite a distance from the bottom.
> the statistics of the questionnaire. I must admit that when asked I
> also lie about my experience.
Thanks for including that. I've often wondered. (And you have a
lot of company. Statisticians say folks often lie to give
answers that are most "in fashion.")
Your notes made me reflect on my own family and friends, and I
realized I know quite a number of people who rarely dated and
started dating later than most of their peers. I know a married
couple who had their first date with each other, and have now
been married quite happily for 20 years. One of my seven brothers
never dated until he was in his 40s. A few others never dated
until their late 20s and 30s.
I never knew about their experience until the last few years.
Your notes made me realize, of course, that people will often
talk about ex-sweeties and old relationships, but people do not
talk about the converse. After all, one does not talk about the
trip, say, that one did not take to Alaska. :) People don't
discuss what they have not been doing. (You may have a great
many friends and acquaintances who are a great deal like
yourself, but it is not in fashion to discuss it ... soooo...)
> ... and please not the usual "Wait for love" answer, 'cause
> I've been doing that for too long now....
Wise comment. Is this how the happiness proverb states it?
"Happiness is something that happens while you're busy doing
something else."
One could switch this around to say love is something that
happens while you're out meeting, working, and playing with others.
How about asking out a few women who you simply find pleasant and
agreeable. There is no law that says the hormone level has to be
soaring before two people go out. In fact, I think a person who
dates only those who fall into the category of potential
long-term partner misses a lot of fun. My attitude here may be
grossly out of style, since, in the US anyway, singles seem to
practice serial monogamy. When I was single, I dated a lot of
people who were good company but not potential partners; I had a
lot of fun, got to knew these people much better ... many
pleasant things happened. Had I only been willing to date "the
prince," life would have been much less interesting.
Going out with a number of people you find agreeable will give
you experience dating, will be pleasant, and will also let you
feel more at ease when you do meet someone who falls into
the potential partner category.
This next suggestion might sound a bit odd, but if you want to
become more at ease meeting and talking to new people, look into
Toastmasters. It's an organization that helps people develop
public speaking skills, and it's also a fairly social group. It
has many bennies. (COMET::TOASTMASTERS has more info.)
> ... given my age etc., I feel the urge to quickly get a
> girlfriend, ... not 'waste my time' ...
> ... I NEED somebody.... and I don't dare wait any longer...
> ... I know, this is not the right way to think
> ... but it's also a matter of feelings ...
Please ignore this question if it strikes you as being too
personal, but why exactly do you want a partner? You touch
upon it with your phrase "matter of feelings" but I am not at all
clear what the feelings are. Social? Sexual? Companionship?
Marriage and family? To fit an imagined social average?
I think it is perfectly natural to want and need somebody.
It's also perfectly natural to feel fine as a single. It is
important, the, for yourself, that you know why you want somebody
and that you approve of your own reasons.
Best of luck. Meigs
|
1235.22 | | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | conferences are like apple barrels | Mon Mar 02 1992 13:03 | 5 |
| re .14 (re .20)
You should be ashamed of yourself
for feeling ashamed of yourself
|