T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1224.1 | my $.02, FWIW | RIPPLE::KENNEDY_KA | Let Go for the Moment | Fri Dec 06 1991 21:32 | 5 |
| Because it makes us feel humble? Because the attention is focused on
us directly? Because we aren't conditioned for things like this?
Because it brings up feelings of being indebted to the other person?
Karen
|
1224.2 | hmmm.... | COMET::WEBBAL | | Fri Dec 06 1991 23:13 | 13 |
|
some folks are just MORE comfortable GIVING than they are
receiving....
my (unasked for) advice to you is to sit back and relax and
enjoy and appreciate and bask in what SHOULD be a warm and
fuzzy kinda feeling.
After all, what goes around... COMES BACK! %^)
aw
|
1224.3 | Maybe... | RANGER::RTRME::Lichtenberg | Mitch Lichtenberg | Sun Dec 08 1991 20:06 | 14 |
|
> why is it that though I LOVE doing nice things for people, I HATE
> it when someone does something nice for me, ESPECIALLY if it
> involves a surprise?
I sometimes feel that way too... but usually because I think
someone's trying to get something out of me. (being a little
paranoid and a lot cynical doesn't help this one bit!) I suppose
it's better than EXPECTING (or worse yet, demanding) people to
do nice things for me, right? :-)
/Mitch.
|
1224.4 | That's what "Thank you" is for | BUZON::BELDIN_R | Pull us together, not apart | Mon Dec 09 1991 08:05 | 8 |
| Many of us were raised under the "Protestant Work Ethic" and "Rugged
Individualism" influences. We were never taught how to accept a gift
graciously. Eventually, we recognize, as you have, that something is wrong.
It takes some unlearning and relearning to change.
fwiw,
Dick
|
1224.5 | Fear? | YQUEM::LIU | Once An Eagle | Mon Dec 09 1991 09:45 | 2 |
|
Fear of being obligated to more than a simple "Thank you"?
|
1224.6 | Psych 101 | MLCSSE::LANDRY | evitcepsrep ruoy egnahc | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:52 | 10 |
|
You're more comfortable being a people pleaser. Your ego is being
served by a low self-esteem and you're more comfortable doing for
others than having someone do for you (since you really don't feel you
deserve it anyway).
Don't take any of this as true - it's just my "arm chair psychology"
taking over!!!!
|
1224.7 | | SCARGO::CONNELL | Goddess is alive. Magic is afoot. | Mon Dec 09 1991 11:54 | 16 |
| I feel the same way much of the time. It's hard to accept gifts. It's
equally hard to accept help from others. I'm learning to change. I've
found to many wonderful people out there who want to let me know that
they care and that they'll do something more then just say "I care".
Help is the hardest to accept. I've always felt that if I can't do it
myself, the I've failed in some way. Changing this attitude also.
I have started telling myself that it's OK to accept gifts without
obligation to return. It's all right to ask for help when you need it
or don't understand something. No one that's worth knowing will think
any less of you. We all need aid now and then. We all need little
surprizes now and then.
Phil(who as been described as: "If I were drowning and someone came up
and offered me a life preserver, I'd spit in their eye.")
|
1224.8 | It *is* harder to receive... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Making life a mystical adventure | Mon Dec 09 1991 14:30 | 32 |
| I agree...with most...especially .2 and .5 and the synergy in .7.
It *is* harder to receive than to give. Contrary to the popular
notion that it's better to give than to receive, it is important to
learn how to receive. (Receiving is not the same thing as *taking*,
by the way.)
There are lots of payoffs in NOT receiving. For one, when we give
we can martyr ourselves to the giving. We can nobilize our
"sacrifice," we can feel superior, we can feel that we've done our
duty. On the other hand, IF THOSE (and similar) beliefs ARE HELD,
then it MUST be the case that if we are on the RECEIVING end,
then we are, by definition and extension, inferior, innoble, unable
to perform our duty, etc. In other words, we would lose our
superior position. What this means is that the reasons for giving
have to be genuine, and not artificial as the examples I suggested.
What it also means is that if those are the beliefs and attitudes
we hold we will disdain receiving...but notice something: EARNING
is not the same as receiving. EARNING would be okay, since it would
be done without obligation...receiving is done WITHOUT obligation and
would therefore be done under "duress." It would be uncomfortable.
I would suggest that for someone who is aware of their difficulty
with receiving it would be wise to first look at how they give and
why...and then to work on their beliefs that keep them from feeling
that it's okay to deserve "the gifts of the universe." Why is it
that the individual doesn't feel that they deserve? Why do they feel
they must be obligated? What (as .5 stated) are the responsibilities
in receiving? Why is it so hard to let one's gratitude be enough?
Why would there be guilt (and therefore anger) in receiving without
obligation?
Good question...and worthy of introspection...
Frederick
|
1224.9 | Passing "Gifts" Onward | YQUEM::LIU | Once An Eagle | Mon Dec 09 1991 14:45 | 4 |
| There are many situations in life where you can not "repay" an individual
for what they give you. This may be due to time, resources, the type of
relationship. So you say thanks. And I try to pass whatever I have
received on to the next deserving individual whenever I get an opportunity.
|
1224.10 | I can relate | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | fortress around my heart | Mon Dec 09 1991 15:50 | 7 |
| Gosh, can I relate. I feel so guilty and obligated for some reason.
But yet I will bend over backwards for people all the time and out of
the good of my heart -- NOT trying to collect favors.
Why is that????
Tammi
|
1224.11 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum. | Tue Dec 10 1991 03:57 | 4 |
| Being a Scot I have very little trouble in accepting gifts. Now giving
them, ah well that's another matter.
Jamie.
|
1224.12 | Taking---bigger and bigger steps | MISERY::WARD_FR | Making life a mystical adventure | Tue Dec 10 1991 09:24 | 11 |
| re: .11 (Jamie)
You sure get off on stereotypes, don't you? Seems to me
you're a walking billboard for judgmentalness.
The catch, for those who may have missed it, and this includes
Jamie, is to both give and receive...both with freedom, responsibility,
integrity and gratitude.
Frederick
|
1224.13 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum. | Tue Dec 10 1991 09:41 | 4 |
| Sorry Frederick, it is not in my nature to part with things. I am
basically a squirrel, I hoard things.
Jamie.
|
1224.14 | ...sits on a rock and cracks nuts...sits on a... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Making life a mystical adventure | Tue Dec 10 1991 10:57 | 7 |
| re: .13 (Jamie)
...like nuts?
;-)
Frederick
|
1224.15 | Control | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | This time forever! | Tue Dec 10 1991 12:41 | 26 |
|
Here's an "armchair analysis". It has to do with control. When
you're doing the giving, you're at the helm, you're in control
of what's happening.
When you walk in the door, the lights go on and everyone
yells "*SUPRISE!!*" - and there's a cake and a table full of
presents and a room full of people - you're hardly "in control"!
You're on somebody else's program...
Some people cant stand to be out of control. That has to do
with ego-centricity; the fact the one's ego cant tolerate revelations
of it's own true powerlessness...over much of anything. The behavior
that follows is that of trying to control everyone and everything
happening in one's life. The root of the ego-centricity is probably
intense unexpressed emotions, such as pain and sorrow.
Having a "hateful" response to recieving a gift or suprise party
is one way to control everyone/everything. That will be noted on
some level and next year, you wont get a suprise, which will suit the
ego just fine. Your response changed another's perception and you
controlled your life's scope toward "No suprises for me! :'( ".
Hope this helps.
Joe
|
1224.16 | interesting... | CSC32::PITT | | Tue Dec 10 1991 16:43 | 27 |
|
re .15
Wow..
good insight....I'll have to give your input alot of thought...you're
right on the point that I HATE NOT being in control....I HATE when
decisions are made AROUND me that affect me, and I HATE not being "in
the know" of things going on....
you're right..
repressed feelings of pain and sorrow? hum...I'll give that some
thought too...
But I KNOW that I've felt this way since I was very young....when I was
14 I got a 10 speed for passing whatever grade it was, and it was
given as a surprise...I remember being angry...and not knowing how to
react. I remember just getting on the bike and driving off...
I think I hate the thought of everyone looking at me waiting to see my
spontanious reaction to 'the surprise'. ..
good things to ponder.
Cathy
|
1224.17 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum. | Wed Dec 11 1991 03:08 | 4 |
| Well Frederick, I must admit that I do seem to attract them, but I
wouldn't say that I actively collected them.
Jamie.
|
1224.18 | "Know thyself?" | LUDWIG::PHILLIPS | Music of the spheres. | Wed Dec 11 1991 10:02 | 25 |
| ...just a couple of ramblings...
As a part-time entertainer in a band, it's my JOB to be nice to people
and to make them glad they came to hear our band, so I'm pretty highly
conditioned to be naturally friendly and outgoing. And I enjoy making
people feel good. By the same token, if I go listen to another band
and they're really entertaining the crowd as well, I feel that, in some
small way, they're being nice to me. I enjoy that also.
If someone at work buys me a cup of coffee, my automatic reaction is
not "Is there some ulterior motive at work here?" but "Thank you - I'll
buy YOU one next time."
I have no trouble accepting kindness from anyone, since I know that it
is a decidedly rare commodity - outside this notefile, of course! ;^)
Nor do I have trouble giving it.
I suppose that it is not a question of "being in control" for me but it
is the fact that I have enough control over myself that I don't mind
relinquishing it for a moment. So I guess I'll just leave it with
"Why ask why?" and go on enjoying life.
Does this make any sense? Oh well :^]
--Eric--
|
1224.19 | | ROYALT::NIKOLOFF | A Leap of Faith | Wed Dec 11 1991 12:33 | 13 |
|
>> Does this make any sense? Oh well :^]
Yes, Eric it makes alot of sense...
oh, and thank you for entering that...
happy holidays,
Mikki B^)
|
1224.20 | my turn / your turn | RANGER::BENCE | A life of shape... | Wed Dec 11 1991 14:28 | 15 |
|
Control and people-pleasing - I spent (spend) a lot of time doing this
and not allowing anyone to reciprocate. This can make friendships
very onesided. Letting go of the control is really tough.
Nowadays I try to remind myself that asking for help (or accepting
the kind acts of others) gives the other fellow a chance to experience
the same "up" that I get doing for others. And life is a lot less
stressful.
clb
|
1224.21 | let's balanced it | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Fri Dec 13 1991 10:26 | 7 |
|
Life is never one sided... it is GIVE and TAKE
that's what makes it great (for everybody)!
Cheers! Ana
|
1224.22 | Another armchair theory | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | This time forever! | Fri Dec 20 1991 11:02 | 35 |
|
re .16, Cathy.
Thank-you.
I thought of your note when "America's funniest people on
home videos" (et al) was on, and showed a young woman getting a *car*
as a suprise. Her reaction made prime-time TV...she was like jumping
all over the place.
I think it's sort of manipulative to extract that kind of reaction
from someone by staging a suprise like that. One has to ask, just
who's "getting the charge" here - the person who's been suprised or the
person doing the suprizing? Obviously, to make it on TV, the reaction
of the suprisee was quite delightful to observe.
In other words, to the parents giving the gift, perhaps they
couldnt feel anything by just giving her the car, they needed
to see this *stupendous reaction* in order to feel good about it.
So they staged it as a suprise. In this case, it's debatable whether
the gift was given so that the person receiving it could feel good,
or it was given more so that the person doing the giving could
feel good - *at the expense of the person receiving it*.
Maybe you knew, at some level, whenever your gifts were given in the
context of a suprise, that the giving was actually more for them than
it was for you. You were perhaps angry over this; that what they
really cared for was *how your reaction would make them feel*. Maybe
you were just sick and tired of taking care of your parents emotions
- again. Your "riding off" was in essance saying "take responsibility
for your own damn emotions...I'm not going to do it for you this time!"
Again, hope this helps.
Joe
|
1224.23 | | COMET::COSTA | Turn it on,turn it up, turn me loose | Fri Dec 20 1991 13:11 | 4 |
|
The eskimoes put it more bluntly - "Gifts make dogs"
|
1224.24 | | MR4DEC::RON | | Fri Dec 20 1991 17:47 | 15 |
|
Not having read the complete string I may be repeating a previous
reply...
I asked a psychologist the same question posed in the base note and
was surprised at the reply. It turns out that people that resent
gifts (especially unexpected ones) tend to have a strong, rigid and
independent personality. They resent the loss of control implied by
the gift.
I knew you wouldn't like this answer. I wasn't thrilled with it
either...
-- Ron
|
1224.25 | not too far fetched. | CSC32::PITT | | Mon Dec 23 1991 12:38 | 5 |
|
.25
actually, it sounds like a reasonable explanation to me.
|
1224.26 | There must be a balance.. | EICMFG::BINGER | Warthogs of the world unite | Mon Dec 23 1991 15:50 | 19 |
| re .22 (just a part)
> Maybe you knew, at some level, whenever your gifts were given in the
> context of a suprise, that the giving was actually more for them than
> it was for you.
Yes, that is exactly where the problem lies. There are two sides to a
transaction. The giving and the getting. Both parts are pleasureable in
different ways. If a giver refuses to be a getter then they refuse to
allow the other party to enjoy the pleasure which they so much enjoy. I
think that .0 declared that they enjoy giving.?
My experience with givers who refuse to be getters is that one day
either a completely unreasonable demand is made.. like a godfather calling
his favour home or a totally unexplained outburst of "after all I have
done for **them**". In either case I find that over givers are to be
avoided just as vigorously as spongers.
There should be a comfortable balance in any healthy relationship where
"getter".
Rgds,
|
1224.27 | To the tune of "Jingle Bells": "Woof woof woof..." | ESGWST::RDAVIS | Just aphasia going through | Tue Dec 24 1991 17:29 | 6 |
| > The eskimoes put it more bluntly - "Gifts make dogs"
This saying refers to the prized Eskimo birthday gift, a pair of
huskies.
Ray
|
1224.28 | as earlier notes have said | MILKWY::ZARLENGA | back by popular demand | Sat Jan 04 1992 15:30 | 3 |
| re:.0
Because then you feel like you owe them something in return?
|
1224.29 | I am back, with my 2 cents! | GOLF::SIGEL | That was just a dream | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:42 | 5 |
| Some folks dont like to be in the "limelight" and like doing for others
more!
Lynne :-)
|
1224.30 | take what you like and leave the rest | VMSSG::NICHOLS | It ain't easy being green | Mon Jan 13 1992 11:17 | 12 |
| my speculation...
Gift giving can be a way of 'buying' approval. A way of saying 'please
like me'
Receiving gifts can be an affirmation of approval, a way of the
receiver 'hearing' "I like you, you are a good person, you deserve to
be treated well, here is a gift to show how much I think of you."
The reluctant gift receiver may not feel worthy of that approval.
The reluctant gift receiver may also be feeling "there is no need for
YOU to buy MY approval, you already have it.
And you can't show me your approval, cuz I don't deserve it.
|