T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1199.1 | If this is your only problem, you don't have any problems | MINAR::BISHOP | | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:30 | 9 |
| Sharing hobbies is nice but hardly vital.
As long as the music nut doesn't bother the other person (i.e. uses
headphones, doesn't turn on the radio in the other person's car), it's
not likely to be a problem. If one person wants the house saturated
with sound and the other wants quiet, then it will be a problem, but
not because of lack of sharing!
-John Bishop
|
1199.2 | | EVETPU::RUST | | Thu Sep 12 1991 10:58 | 26 |
| Ah, but the problem comes in when the partners have different
expectations as to the degree of mutual involvement in hobbies and
activities. If the classical buff insists that the partner learn to
appreciate it, and feels hurt and angry if s/he won't... or if the
non-classical (?) partner insists on tagging along to every concert and
symphony even though it's obvious that s/he doesn't understand or enjoy
a note of it... or if one partner wants the other to do all the
learning, adjusting, etc. but refuses to take up an interest in the
other partner's hobbies...
This kind of miscommunication can be a very big problem indeed. And
often it's the sort of thing people assume, so it may not be discussed
early enough to avoid hurt feelings. "Why, if people are in love, of
COURSE they'll want to become actively involved in their partner's
interests!" thinks A, and is hurt when B shows no interest in
bungee-jumping. And "If people are in love, they respect each other's
interests and leave each other plenty of opportunities to pursue them,"
says B, and is furious when A either requests that B skip the kayaking
trip to go bungee-jumping, or take A along kayaking even though A is
hopelessly inept, catches cold easily, and cannot swim.
For heaven's sake, talk about expectations! [In case nobody's guessed,
I've, um, run into a few of these little misunderstandings in my
time... ;-)]
-b
|
1199.3 | I'd pursuit these dreams first! | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Thu Sep 12 1991 13:22 | 33 |
| re.2 makes some excellent points.
My mate and I are quite opposite in personality and hobbies, however,
I really appreciate or rather have come to enjoy, to some degree,
taking part in his activities. Since knowing him, I've learned
to fish, hunt, field dress, get up early in the morinings, make
more friends and cook.
Our differences lie mainly in our personalities. I'm very ambitious
and hard working, and enjoy school. I enjoy debates and hanging
around very intelligent people. He on the other hand can't stand
to argue over issues, smokes like a chimney and loves beer, while
playing Nintendo.
After all these years and our divorce and reunion, we've finally
come to some agreement on how to determine what's worth arguing
and how, as well as, leaving each other alone to pursuit our hobbies.
For instance, I'm very determined to finish college and earn a degree
in Journalism and Film. He's going to help by not complaining and
take care of our 2 kids while I'm in school in the evenings. I
love to travel and I'm quite a dreamer. Not him! We argue quite
often over our different interests and admit that we are really
crazy people and don't know why we insist on sharing our lives to
our hairs fall out.
Anyway, after these years, I've found out that no matter how much
I almost hate him at times, I just can't help myself in that I love
him to death.
I guess you just have to talk things over right away in the beginning,
'cause later it can get very complicated! indeed!
|
1199.4 | Did I answer the right question? | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Sep 12 1991 14:15 | 4 |
| It's nice to have *a* hobby in common, but it is not necessary to
have *every* hobby in common.
Ann B.
|
1199.5 | Guess I'm a type B [more ways than 1] | JAWS::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Thu Sep 12 1991 23:08 | 6 |
| How are we defining "hobby"?
Seems to me if A *or* B does it, it's a hobby--
But if A *and* B do it, it's a lifestyle.
Leslie-who-doesn't-want-anybody-helping-her-knit
|
1199.6 | | CFSCTC::GLIDEWELL | Wow! It's The Abyss! | Fri Sep 13 1991 01:08 | 23 |
| Stikes me that there is a quantum difference between
having a hobby and embracing a profession.
Hobby Launching into new profession
------------------ --------------------------------------
a few hours a week off at school and days/nights in class
and performing
minor money loss or reduction of current income
money needed to support training ...
mostly private, immersion in a new world
a few friends
> is it really important that those feelings can be understood
> and shared and not just accepted ???
Might be helpful for such a couple to talk about the time and money
that can be needed to change careers. It's good to know before
marriage that one's SO just happens to be thinking of med school.
Does "acceptance" accept a time and money committment?
|
1199.7 | | VALKYR::RUST | | Fri Sep 13 1991 10:28 | 18 |
| Re .6: Weeeeelll... I know lots of people (including myself, at times)
whose hobbies sound more like your "new profession" column. ;-) But my
point - that differing expectations about such things can be VERY big
bones of contention in a relationship - applies to both. I've certainly
heard enough tales of woe from people who, as a long-term relationship
breaks up, say (A: "We never spent any time together"; B: "But I was
throwing myself into my work for YOU").
Admittedly, it can be hard to discuss these things, since it often
doesn't occur to people that something they consider an excellent
opportunity or a rollicking good time might not seem that way to their
nearest and dearest. So they deliver what they assume will be good
news, from "I've quit my job and bought a farm; we're going to live off
the fat of the land!" to "I've taken up electric guitar again. And
guess what - I bought a drum set for you!" And they're so _surprised_
when their partner doesn't go into transports of delight...
-b
|
1199.8 | Tunes | FSOA::LSIGEL | My dog ate my briefcase | Fri Sep 13 1991 18:05 | 8 |
| My husband likes classic rock I like top 40 and dance.
He got used to top 40 and knows I like it so he does not gripe at all.
I dont let it interfere with our relationship though, to me it is not
important if he does not share the same musical tastes. I buy the CDs
I like he buys the ones he does.
Lynne
|
1199.9 | | CFSCTC::GLIDEWELL | Wow! It's The Abyss! | Sat Sep 21 1991 01:59 | 20 |
| -b and Lynne raise some good points. When my husband moved from
computing as an interest to computing as a way of life, I had no
problems at all with the equipment and infinite number of
magazines and books that filled the house.
If, however, he had decided to go into rock and roll -- and practice
at home for several hours a day -- I would move out. Maybe buy the
house next door, but I could NOT live with loud music. By hour four I
would be homicidal. Same thing if he went into the kennel business.
Same thing, I guess, if he did something that rolled us into immense
debt -- say he decided to collect Corvettes and pay for all ten of
them on time. I wouldn't be part of it.
But ... if he wants to quit his job and run for politial office or
go back and get another degree, that would be OK. Maybe he wants to
paint oils for five years. That's OK.
Hmmm ... my philosophy appears to be "Dance all you like and whereever
you like, just stay off My toes, thanks." Meigs
|
1199.10 | who cares for a 'hobby'? | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Tue Oct 01 1991 15:39 | 5 |
| Real LOVE takes care of it... when in love you LOVE everything that
comes from him or her! no need to adjust, you are in heaven with music
or without it!
Ana
|
1199.11 | Real Love takes care of it is only for top 40 | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Tue Oct 01 1991 18:22 | 6 |
| re.10
The magic word "in love" is at the very beginning then as most things
this love conquers all does slowly end. Not to say love ends but
the blinders do! If there's something that you really enjoy and
the person you love doesn't support you, you'll live to resent it.
|
1199.12 | | TENAYA::RAH | | Wed Oct 02 1991 00:32 | 5 |
|
if the couple has music to fight over, it would soak up the hostility
that would otherwize seek an outlet through fights over the credit card
balance or the checking account balance.
|
1199.13 | | MCIS5::WOOLNER | Photographer is fuzzy, underdeveloped and dense | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:41 | 8 |
| Good point, .12.
Also, some people need alone time, and hobbies requiring a separate
location (even opposite ends of the house or apartment!) can satisfy
that get-outta-my-FACE! requirement. Even brief absences can make the
heart grow fonder.
Leslie
|
1199.14 | | DDIF::RUST | | Wed Oct 02 1991 11:07 | 14 |
| Re .12: In my experience, hostility doesn't get "soaked up" - if it's
diverted instead of dealt with, it ferments and eventually explodes...
Which is not to say that, for very mild levels of disagreement, it
might not be more fun to argue about frivolous things than more serious
ones. Seems (to me) that mild teasing about "that awful music you love"
might sting less than "are you overdrawn _again_?", if only because the
former deals with opinion and can be used by both sides, while the
latter deals with one's shortcomings in a fundamental living skill [am
I showing bias here? ;-)]. But even here, it's important to know what
topics your partner's really sensitive about, and to avoid giving them
the needle there...
-b
|
1199.15 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee, RSX Development | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:22 | 5 |
| re .12
An interesting theory.
- M
|
1199.16 | | TENAYA::RAH | | Sat Oct 05 1991 00:21 | 4 |
|
oh well, what do I know?
not that I've any recent experience ;^
|