T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1150.1 | Any near-by apartments? | MINAR::BISHOP | | Fri Mar 22 1991 16:07 | 7 |
| Is it possible for you to get her a small apartment within walking
distance? If you can handle the extra money, that would give her
an available parent, but get her out of your wife's hair.
It sounds very uncomfortable.
-John Bishop
|
1150.2 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | corner of 18th and Fairfax | Sun Mar 24 1991 11:18 | 10 |
| Is counseling an option, a bit for family members separately and then
some together.
Sometimes that can bring up all the hidden stuff that maybe going on,
or offer new insights into the stuff that's not-so-hidden and may be
wreaking havoc on your situation. You don't really go into what the
problems are specifically, but they sound pretty serious.
-jody
|
1150.3 | I can't believe this!! | RAVEN1::STUBBLEFIELD | | Sun Mar 24 1991 19:54 | 20 |
|
RE: .0 First of all, aren't you appalled by the fact YOU even
think you should put your daughter....your flesh and
blood in a foster home or whatever? I think you should
sit your wife down and have a talk with her and tell her
to grow up. Is she trying to compete for your attention?
If so, sounds like she's insecure or jealous. Does your
daughter do things to upset your wife? Talk to your daughter
and tell her what you will tolerate and tell her to grow
up also. I have a perfect step-mother and I had to live
my father for a little while along with 2 brothers and
another sister who was a problem. My father put his foot
down and now that she's older, her and my step-mother get
along great. I really do have an exceptional step-mother,
I only hope if I'm ever in that situation I'll be half that
exceptional. ;-)
Melinda
|
1150.4 | foster care has a lot of ramifications | MEMIT::GIUNTA | | Mon Mar 25 1991 08:13 | 46 |
| My husband was in a similar situation as your daughter, except he was
only 11 or 12 at the time. His mother didn't want him, so he lived
with his father and step-mother for a while until the step-mother gave
the father a choice, and my husband was put into foster care where he
remained through college til he was on his own. However, his father
and step-mother, who were blaming some of their marital problems on
Mark, ended up divorced anyhow, and my husband has never been close to
either of his parents since then (he's 34 now). I'd think long and
hard if I were you before I chose to put my daughter in foster care
just to remove the problem from the house. I don't believe that the
problem will go away, only that it will become a different problem.
I think the counseling sounds like a good idea. I also second the idea
about putting your foot down and saying what is and isn't acceptable
behavior, and then sticking to it. I know that when my nephew lived
with me one summer (he was about 20) because he had a summer job up
here, I had a lot more rules than he was used to at home, but since I
laid them all out up front and was consistent and didn't put up with
him breaking them, he learned to adjust. And it's interesting to note
that, here we are a few years later, and he still abides by my rules
when he's dealing with me yet he wouldn't think of treating his own
parents the same way because they never demanded it. And we're talking
simple courtesy things here like call when you're going to be late!
I wish you well as you try to deal with this problem, but please think
about what you're doing carefully before you do anything drastic like
foster care or a group home. I've had to work through a lot of
problems with my husband due to the insecurities he picked up living in
foster care, and I know that his parents still wonder why they don't
have a relationship with him, but they still really don't want him, and
it shows. And I don't know how many children you have, but my husband
is the only one that no one wanted out of 6 children (I think because he
was the second oldest and therefore already at a more rebellious stage
when his parents got divorced), and I know he feels the pinch from
being singled out like that.
And how much of your daughter's behavior can be chalked up to being
standard for a 16-year-old? I know that was about when I started to
want more independence, and I had a fairly strict upbringing and was a
fairly well-behaved teen-ager.
I don't think there are any easy answers to this. I wish you well in
deciding on which course you will take.
Cathy
|
1150.5 | your daughter should come first | LUNER::MACKINNON | | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:11 | 16 |
|
This may sound harsh, but here goes. Your daughter should be the
most important person in this situation. To a point, I can understand
your wife being upset, but to suggest you put your daughter into
foster care???!!!! Clearly your wife refuses to accept the fact that
this is your daughter who despite her age is still a child. It would
be inhumane to put her into foster care at this stage of the game.
She needs as much of your love and support that she can get.
IMO your daughter should come first. No ifs ands or buts about it.
Your wife is an adult and does not need you to be her parent, whereas
your daughter most definately does. Tough choice to make. All I
can say is follow your heart.
Michele
|
1150.6 | Negotiate house rules | KYOA::CHANG | | Mon Mar 25 1991 12:45 | 29 |
| I agree with some of the earlier notes - foster care would be yet
one more blow for your daughter to suffer, and it will not necessarily
save your second marriage, either.
Since you didn't mention any particular problems between your wife
and daughter, it is hard to make further suggestions. Talk with
your wife and find out what specific things she is not happy with.
Then talk with your daughter to find out what specific things she
is not happy with. But DON'T try to be a go-between and solve the
problems yourself. Being a mediator never works longterm (IMO).
Once there is a group of specific things from each, and it wouldn't
hurt to have a list of your own, too, try a sitdown meeting with
all three of you. If some of the base issues can be discussed openly
and in full, maybe some "house rules" can be created for all to live
in a more compatible way. If everyone knows the rules and also knows
their needs are being met, it should ease the pressure and tension.
This might not be a once and for all type of solution, and rules
might have to be realigned if they are not working (at another three
way meeting).
If this is impossible, maybe an impartial councellor will have to be
used as a mediator. Remember, EPA offers 6 (I think) free councelling
sessions per year. Maybe this is the time to give them a call.
Good luck,
Chris
|
1150.7 | | SAINT::STCLAIR | | Mon Mar 25 1991 14:00 | 13 |
|
There are four people involved in this: The husband, his ex wife, his
present wife and his daughter. The feelings of his ex and present wife are
not well described. Let me suggest his ex wife may have suggested this to
discomfort his present wife. A previous reply aptly described how the presence
of his daughter may add to existing stresses in his present marriage. If
all were well here I doubt the daughter would be as much of a problem.
I think the problem is a lot more complex than his wife simply not wanting
to raise his daughter. I reccomend counseling for all concerned except his ex.
|
1150.8 | I have a different opinion on this: | ASDS::BARLOW | i THINK i can, i THINK i can... | Mon Mar 25 1991 17:29 | 50 |
|
I have several different opinions. First of all, I firmly believe that
alot of children today are spoiled rotten because they realize/think
that they are more important to their parents than their parents are
to each other. You and your wife should be a united front to/with
your daughter. She should not know, if possible that your wife
disagrees with her presense. That will only furthur charge the
situation. Addressing your daughter from a position of strength,
(I love my wife and I am not willing to give her up), will give you
better barganing ability. You married your wife forever, you pooled
genes with your ex wife and had a child. That child you do owe
something to, but I think that child, whose personality is
created by chance of a gene pool, should be LESS important possibly
than the woman you've chosen to spend your life with.
On the other hand, we don't have much information here. Perhaps
you've changed your mind about your wife. Perhaps she's a coniving,
jealous person and your daughter is innocent. That's a different
situation.
On the other hand, if your daughter is murderous or physically
dangerous to your wife, (or visa versa) then the violent one has to
go.
My point here is that only you can judge, based on your situation,
who needs to give. I don't think anyone should assume that your wife
is in the wrong. My parents adopted a child from Equador when he was
6. That child created horrible probelms in the family. He attempted
to murder and rape my brother. He was violent with my mother. Still
my father would not get rid of him. (Of course, my mother could have
acted also, but that's not how their marriage was defined.) Dad
finally send Nick back when he forged Dad's name on a Cub-Scouts
badge. This is an example of messed up priorities. (Nick is now
in a correctional institution for violent teens. He was adopted by
another family who ended up divorced after 25 years of marriage.)
Another assumption that I would like to address, is that the fault
lies with your daughter or wife. Is it possible that you ignore
your wife now that you have a daughter? Is it possible that you
will not actively sleep with your wife, for fear of waking up your
child? I think you need to sit and talk with/listen to your wife.
She probably has a very clear picture of the situation or a least
a different picture.
I also think counselling is a great idea. Church is also a good idea.
A little religion never hurt anyone.
Rachael
|
1150.9 | A child is a responsibility | SMAUG::GARROD | An Englishman's mind works best when it is almost too late | Mon Mar 25 1991 20:05 | 13 |
| Re .-1
You seem to be minimizing the responsibility a parent has to a child.
Personally I think a parent has a greater responsibility to their child
than to their spouse. The way I look at it is; you bring a child into
this world, you look after and care for that child, at least until that
child is a legal adult. None of this gene pooling crap to absolve
yourself of responsibility.
Yes I know the situation in .0 is a little more complicated given that
the parents are separated.
Dave
|
1150.10 | more questions than answers | CFSCTC::UPHAM | nothing clever ever comes to mind | Tue Mar 26 1991 11:07 | 23 |
|
no experince with this type of situation, but.....
what about the ex wife's responsibilities?
everyone is suggesting that the father, current wife, and daughter
need to work up "house rules" etc....
I know I don't know all the details as to how/why the daughter was
kicked out of her but mother's house, but if the daughter was living
there, shouldn't one course of action be to have the daughter and
mother (ex wife) try to work out their differences?
this is just an hypopthesis, but if the daughter didn't have the
father to turn to, would the mother have thrown the daughter out of
the house? I could see that the current wife possibly views the ex
as unfairly dumping her problems on her husband and herself...is this
possible?
at any rate....good luck
barb
|
1150.11 | ...just a tangent... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME---as an Adventurer! | Tue Mar 26 1991 11:11 | 9 |
| re: .8 (Rachael)
This is a nit, please note.
To your last line, "a little religion never hurt anyone."
I totally disagree with that. I find that religion has done
more harm than any single other influence on the planet.
Frederick
|
1150.12 | Just my 2 cents | HYSTER::DELISLE | | Tue Mar 26 1991 15:41 | 36 |
| Are there any other relatives who might be willing to have your
daughter live with them. Sounds to me like there is so much history
behind your situation that emotions are running high. I believe it's
the emotional turmoil we all have lying in us that creates the problems
we attempt to so logically deal with. Unfortunately logic often fails
to address emotional problems. Counseling is in order for that.
Perhaps there's a grandparent, an aunt or uncle, a cousin that might
welcome your daughter for a time? Sometimes living with a comparative
stranger such as this is just the situation for kids with problems,
they tend to respect others rules and opinions far more than their own
parents, for whom they may have only contempt (for whatever reason true
or false) and for whom they can only feel anger.
My younger brother had (still has in fact) a good friend during his
teenage years who absolutely could not get along with his parents.
This friend finally ran away from home, was living in his car for
awhile I believe. These parents were "fine upstanding middle class"
people and were at their wits end what to do. My brother talked to my
parents, and this boy came to live with them. He lived there for a bit
over a year I think, graduated high school, and got a job and finally
moved out. But the rules of the house were laid out and he respected
them because he wanted to live there. He eventually reestablished
contact with his parents, and today is actually in business with his
father.
Some kids have rocky teenage years for sure. And some people are
simply not good at parenting during those years. I also know
personally of a marriage that was ruined by a son moving in with his
non-custodial father. The boy stole money, had parties, did not
respect property, would not work, and the list goes on. It is not
always the "new" spouse's fault. But I DO think a parent has more
obligation to a child than a spouse if a choice is to be made.
Sometimes that means kicking the child out, to find out the world is
not always a kind place, and you must live by certain rules.
|
1150.14 | Reality Intrudes on the Fantasy Life | MRKTNG::GODIN | Shades of gray matter | Wed Mar 27 1991 08:44 | 46 |
| I've already offered my observations to the base noter in another
conference, but something Linda said in .13 pushed one of my hot
buttons. This is not to say that Linda hasn't suffered at the hands of
her husband's first wife or that that suffering is justified, nor do I
disagree with her when she says
> Second wives take a lot of heat and a lot of the problems come from
> the first wife, and were, in my opinion, factors of the first divorce.
Nevertheless,
> The second wife married the gentleman under the apparent scenario
> of him and her...and then suddenly has a nearly adult child forced
> on her....
Let's face reality, folks, whether we like it or not.
Anyone who marries a previously married person who has children by the
earlier marriage MUST face the possibility that those children might
someday have to live with the new family unit. Custodial parents die
or become incapacitated or any number of other possibilities,
leaving the non-custodial parent as the sole provider. Children go
through traumas of one kind or another that make a change of scene
necessary (such as this case). Whatever the reasons, there's ALWAYS a
possibility that a non-custodial parent might some day become the
custodial parent. This is a reality that is better faced and discussed
and acknowledged BEFORE the second (or third or ....) marriage.
If the love of your life has children from a former marriage, you can
bet your tush you're going to become involved in those children's lives
to some degree, and not always in a way that suits your plans. To
believe otherwise is naive.
> I feel the root of the problem here is the first wife and the second
> wife and child are the pawns.
I feel the root of the problem here is the second marriage and what
wasn't discussed and agreed to before the I do's were said. The second
wife is a party to that, and the child is the pawn.
Without even getting into whether the birth mother bears any additional
responsibility here, I still agree with the noter who said the second
wife needs to grow up.
Karen
|
1150.15 | re.14 ...good reading! | WLDWST::EVANS | My HEART is DANCING | Wed Mar 27 1991 08:55 | 6 |
|
RE:14
I think that was well said. Not enough couples deal with the
what ifs ????....before the I dos.
J
|
1150.17 | How does anarchy get defined? | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME---as an Adventurer! | Wed Mar 27 1991 10:51 | 27 |
| re: .16 (becca)
Religions have been devised as a means to put "God" in a box.
Spirituality is unique and individualized. Attempting to make
all people conform to someone's or something's standardized
interpretation of what "God" is is inherently flawed and short-
sighted. Virtually all religions, past and present, work hard
to "convert" the remainder of the world to their point of view.
So there are then two problems: the first, that religion is
defective in the first place; the second, that domination or
manipulation are the means utilized to both maintain control
within the group of followers AND also to attempt to bring others
outside that group within the "flock." It is this manipulation,
control, domination, by means of fear, punishment, righteousness,
blame, guilt, etc. that is the most destructive thing that occurs
in society. That religions feel compelled to do so in order to
ensure their survival, is shameful, in my view. There is not
one single established religion that can be named that does not
do most, if not all, of the above. We live our lives under the
massive influences of these various dogmas. And we often fight
over the beliefs within those dogmas. And whether the struggle
is with others (person to person) or within (ourself,) there is
no escaping the battles as long as those criteria are held in
place.
Frederick
|
1150.19 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Mar 27 1991 11:58 | 5 |
| Please - let's leave the arguing about religion to another note. Feel
free to start one if you wish, though I fear that it is another topic for
which the battle can go on without end.
Steve
|
1150.21 | OH, NOOOoooooo.... | BENONI::JIMC | illegitimi non insectus | Fri Mar 29 1991 13:02 | 21 |
| well, sh*t. I just finished typing a reply to each of the replies and
when I went to submit it, lost the whole thing because the "network
partner aborted logical link".
Basically here it is in short;
Jenni is a good kid. Her mother is a Ph.D. psychologist who may be
nuttier than her patients. Jenni tries hard to be helpful and
cooperative. She is also a teenager and most of us need no more
explanation. I love her and would not even give serious consideration
to being sent away. I never downplayed the importance of my children
to me and even predicted that this would eventually occur (about the
time Jenni turned 16). I love my wife, but, she cannot see past her
own need to have life EXACTLY the way she wants it, and I cannot
accomodate that desire which is why this marriage is going down the
tubes (and I will be glad just to see the pain levels go down).
Thanks for your support and the chance to talk about this.
Hugs to all
jimc
|
1150.22 | | WLDKAT::GALLUP | Kathy Gallup...DTN 291.8335 | Fri Mar 29 1991 13:25 | 26 |
|
> well, sh*t. I just finished typing a reply to each of the replies
>and when I went to submit it, lost the whole thing because the "network
>partner aborted logical link".
No you didn't (you just think you lost it).
When this happens, immediately open ANY conference (preferably open the
one that you just got thrown out of, but that doesn't always work).
Type REPLY/LAST. It will bring up the contents of your LAST buffer,
which should be what you just typed in. Save the contents of that to a
file (ideally you should be using an editor that you understand and you
should know the command to save the file). When you get back to the
conference where you wanted to enter it, just use that file as your
reply.
All is NOT lost when a NOTESfile bumps you out. But, the second you
exit NOTES completely, you'll never get it back.
kath
|
1150.23 | | VMSZOO::ECKERT | Why do I have spring fever? | Fri Mar 29 1991 17:35 | 12 |
| re: .22
There's no need to open another conference to write the contents
of the NOTES$EDIT buffer. The example below assumes one is using
the character cell VAX Notes interface with the EVE editor on a terminal
with a LKxxx keyboard (i.e., not a hardcopy, VT52, or VT1xx) or a
workstation:
Notes> EVE BUFFER NOTES$EDIT
(in EVE)
<DO>WRITE filename
<DO>NOTES
|
1150.24 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Mar 30 1991 10:15 | 5 |
| And of course none of this works if you're using the DECwindows
interface to NOTES. Further discussion of NOTES tips can take
place in the CLT::VAXNOTES_BUGS or OASS::VAXNOTES_INTRO conferences.
Steve
|