T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1114.1 | I have a dream... | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Thu Nov 29 1990 11:53 | 33 |
| You can not change society because it is composed by many, many people
with many different backgrounds, and standards, and values, that differ
greatly from one another, but one thing we can change is our own
families and our environment, in there we put our OWN standards and
values. If I had a "magic wand" I would teach children a bit more
manners from much earlier than it is done these days... kids are let do
whatever they want to do and that is NOT RIGHT in my point of view... I
did teach MY OWN kids since day one not to interrupt adults when adults
are talking, I taught them to go to their room to play when visits came
over, and to be very quiet when at church, kids are very smart and they
DO know when they can get away with anything... and they knew that they
had to obey me in those subjects because I was consistent in explaining
why they had to behave and... THEY DID, it was a joy going out with
them, always behaved very nicely and people and friends were delighted
to have them around because they were so well behaved.
Other tabu is... free sex. I would uncover my "magic wand" and eliminate
so much promiscuity, so much fooling around as we have these days and
that would certainly curb the epidemics we have with vd, aids and all
those related diseases and let's not talk of the many unwanted babies
brought to this world only to be left out to whoever wants to adopt
them... and those who go from foster home to foster home... My magic
wand would make SEX to be legitimate only inside MARRIAGE, and marriage
only possible within genuine LOVE...
That would put marriage where it WAS MEANT TO BE, before our society
destroyed it with divorce, anulments, "open" marriages where anything
fits...
Can you imagine what kind or world that would be? what a nice dream...
to have a world full of easy, happy, and clean people!
p.s. (to those who do like promiscuity, little ummanageable brats, use
of drugs and other "gifts" of our society... rejoice, my "magic wand"
does not exist (except in my house)!
aids and the like...
|
1114.2 | Where do we start? | NETMAN::BASTION | Fix the mistake, not the blame | Thu Nov 29 1990 13:34 | 32 |
| Where does one begin...
- Change the way that children are being educated; how can they
understand something like the constitution when they can only
recite the amendments without understanding how they came about?
- Impart information that children will use later in life -
balancing a checkbook, running a household, car repair, etc.
- Change the images that we see in advertising. The majority of
current ads have an underlying theme of "buy this product and
all your problems will be solved..."
- Given that TV is such a powerful medium, why not use it wisely?
Why is it that daytime TV has such loose restrictions? Learn
that there IS an "off" button
- It would be naive to wish for an end to crime and promiscuous
behavior, but first we need to look at *why* such behavior is
rampant.
No, there are no magic wands, but we don't need to accept that which no
longer works. The "old rules" are being thrown to the wind because
times have changed; this leaves us with uncertainty about what lies
ahead.
It's up to each of us to stand up for what we believe is right.
Judi
|
1114.3 | No, not Manhattan, Kansas... | STAR::RDAVIS | Mr. Earl | Thu Nov 29 1990 13:46 | 3 |
| Everyone would grow up in Manhattan.
Ray
|
1114.4 | Most grownups aren't adults, either. | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME---as an Adventurer! | Thu Nov 29 1990 14:52 | 20 |
| re: .0
On a personal level, there are lots of things to do...the things
that we do to implement our principles...the things that reveal our
character.
But I like something that Lazaris has stated...there are three
*obligations* (which exist until they have been replaced by needs,
which in turn exist unless they've been upgraded to preferences) which
parents have to their children:
1. To give them the best education that is appropriate for them to
give.
2. To teach them "manners."
3. (The most important) To teach them self-love.
I don't think I can improve on that...as I said, what I would do
is to work on that implementation.
Frederick
|
1114.6 | | GUESS::DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo | Thu Nov 29 1990 19:41 | 6 |
| Getting rid of the public school system would be a good
start. Why do parents send their children to schools
that aren't allowed to teach their values and aren't able
to teach the three 'r's?
Dan
|
1114.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Nov 29 1990 20:54 | 41 |
| This is partly triggered by a comment in .6, but reflects something
I've been thinking about for a while.
Why do "we" find it necessary that schools, TV, movies, whatever
teach "our values"? Whatever happened to us imparting our own
values to our children?
This is the most fundamental change I would like to see. I would
like parents to stop foisting the responsibility of how our children
grow up on the schools and other external influences, and for
these parents to acknowledge that THEY are the ones who are most
responsible for what their child becomes. If we as parents set
a good example for our children, encourage curiosity, kindness
and show them love, our kids will, by and large, turn out ok.
I read much too much of people decrying the "bad influence" of
cartoon characters such as Bart Simpson, or parents insisting that
the schools teach their children how to behave in addition to giving
them the gift of knowledge.
I am a parent (how many of you who have responded earlier are?).
I see the schools increasingly saddled with teaching children
values that they should be learning at home, and this leaves less
time for the job schools should be doing. It seems many parents
believe that they are not responsible for their children, and this
is what has to change.
My son gets his values from his parents. We give him love, encourage
him to reach for the stars, and develop in him a strong sense of self.
And in this environment he thrives.
And related to all of this, perhaps most basic of all, is this belief
which I hold firmly. In the most ideal world of all, each and every
child who is born would be wanted and loved by their parents. The
corollary to this is that people who don't want to become parents
shouldn't have to be against their will. Ideally, this would be a
result of education and medical advances in contraception.
But this isn't an ideal world, is it?
Steve
|
1114.8 | I like these types of notes... | CSS::SOULE | Pursuing Synergy... | Thu Nov 29 1990 21:55 | 20 |
| Steve, I enjoyed reading your whole reply...
.7> My son gets his values from his parents. We give him love, encourage
.7> him to reach for the stars, and develop in him a strong sense of self.
.7> And in this environment he thrives.
Could you further elaborate on how you "develop in him a strong sense of self"?
.7> And related to all of this, perhaps most basic of all, is this belief
.7> which I hold firmly. In the most ideal world of all, each and every
.7> child who is born would be wanted and loved by their parents.
Perhaps this belief should be called the Fundamental Law of Humanity...
Do you have any others?
.7> But this isn't an ideal world, is it?
Perhaps the Mission of Humanity is to make this an ideal world...
Regards, Don
|
1114.9 | | GUESS::DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo | Thu Nov 29 1990 23:56 | 11 |
| re .7,
In "teach their values" in .6 "their" meant the parents'
values, not the children's values. "Reinforce" would
have been a better word than "teach". With a choice of
schools one hopes it would be easier for parents to find
one that at least tried to give the same message to their
kids. Then what is taught in the home wouldn't be
untaught in the schools.
Dan (not a parent)
|
1114.10 | Off the top of my head... | SAGE::GODIN | Naturally I'm unbiased! | Fri Nov 30 1990 08:31 | 15 |
| 1. Love and appreciate your own self as much as you do others.
2. Accept responsiblity for your own life and your own actions.
3. Learn that discipline is not a bad word or a negative concept, but
rather the means for achieving your goals and living in harmony.
4. Discover the wonder and reward of curiosity.
5. Exercise your natural creativity on a daily basis so that you can
bring joy to yourself and others and advancement to the world
around you.
Karen
|
1114.11 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Nov 30 1990 09:19 | 18 |
| Re: .9
I understood what you meant, Dan. I don't consider it the responsibility
of the schools to teach my values to my children. I can do that just fine,
thanks. If I do my job right, nothing that happens in the schools will
undo what I have done.
Re: .8
By "develop a strong sense of self" I meant that he is treated as an individual,
with feelings and responsibilities. He is encouraged to make his own
choices (within the boundaries we set), express his feelings and to
understand the consequences of his actions. He is not an appendage of a
parent, but his own person. Our job as parents is to instill in him the
knowledge and values that will help him grow into an adult. A child who
believes in himself (or herself) won't be susceptible to "bad" influences.
Steve
|
1114.12 | | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | BLUSH | Fri Nov 30 1990 09:33 | 8 |
| RE: .5
Why would you run away from home? These are the values I was raised
with; it didn't seem like too much of a drag.
Oh well.
E Grace
|
1114.13 | Reflections... | BSS::VANFLEET | Chased by my Higher Self! | Fri Nov 30 1990 11:24 | 21 |
| RE .9 Dan
I think there's a danger in shielding kids from anything but their
parent's values. I prefer my daughter to be exposed to many different
ways of thinking. Otherwise she would not be aware that life consists
of a myriad of different types of people from different backgrounds and
experience levels. She would not be aware that there are always
choices to be made in life and would never have the opportunity to be
challenged by those who may not agree with her. I think that by
answering these challenges we develop a stronger sense of who we are
and what place values and integrity take in defining what "self" is.
I'm not saying this is always easy for a child and that it doesn't take
help and encouragement from the parents. But in the long run I think
it helps to develop a stronger personality and helps the child prepare
for the challenges presented by the "real world".
After all, if a child is raised in a bubble his/her view of the world
is more than likely going to be pretty distorted.
Nanci
|
1114.14 | from I have a dream... | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Fri Nov 30 1990 12:18 | 14 |
| to .5 from .1
Why would you run from home? ... I don't think you qualify to get in,
in the first place! but to update you on our children's development...
those kids grew up with a great sense of values, very happy and very
people oriented, multicultured, have travelled extensively by the time
they were in Jr High, graduated from H. School in Japan, graduated suma
cum laude from Tufts university with 2 majors and a semester ahead of
her class, at 23, is a banker, lives in Manhattan, NY, has a nice bank
account to herself, is 100% self-sufficient, and what is best, has been
able to avoid unstable people who would harm her or make her suffer.
What a drag! eh? I have two others, a 24 yr old who is a TV producer
and a 16 yr who is a great wrestler, but I won't bore you any more...
|
1114.15 | | HPSTEK::XIA | In my beginning is my end. | Fri Nov 30 1990 13:07 | 16 |
| We go through three stages in life and perhaps more. When
we were young, we saw the world and thought it was not good.
We decided to dedicate our lives to change it for the better.
Then we woke up one day and realized we could not really change
the world, so we set out to change ourselves. At certain
point, we realized that that too was an illusion. We became
fatalistic and resigned. The only thing left to us were the
childhood memory, and we discovered that our inner vision had
become the vision of a wasteland. We were left to wander
when our garden of Eden became a ruined wasteland.
The parents' job is to prolong the first stage for their
children as long as possible and make sure that the third
stage arrives at 72 not 27.
Eugene
|
1114.16 | Call me naive but... | BSS::VANFLEET | Chased by my Higher Self! | Fri Nov 30 1990 13:30 | 9 |
| Eugene -
Some of us never get past stage one despite the way we were raised.
:-) And some of us go from stage one to two to three and back to one
again and then even integrate one and two! We may not be able to
change the world on a global scale as individuals but we can change the
way we perceive the world.
Nanci
|
1114.17 | | IAMOK::MITCHELL | I thought t'was the parking brake | Fri Nov 30 1990 13:31 | 11 |
|
re .0
A start would be to give our children respect from the
very beginning of their lives. Don't treat them as
mindless/brainless beings during their infancy and
childhood.
kits
|
1114.18 | | HPSTEK::XIA | In my beginning is my end. | Fri Nov 30 1990 14:01 | 7 |
| re .16,
Nanci -
Then I would say your parents did a great job. :-)
Eugene
|
1114.19 | | GUESS::DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo | Fri Nov 30 1990 17:23 | 10 |
| re .10
>> 2. Accept responsiblity for your own life and your own actions.
I think that is definitely one of the most important
things that can be taught to children growing up.
Especially as a large portion of the past couple of
generations seems to have missed that lesson.
Dan
|
1114.21 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Fri Nov 30 1990 19:31 | 7 |
| re.15
When I was young I thought the world was a wonderful place as I aged I
discovered it had problems but never have I resigned from trying to make it
a better place to live. Even with all it's problems life is great at least
from where I see it.
-j
|
1114.22 | thoughts on my own family | WMOIS::B_REINKE | bread&roses | Fri Nov 30 1990 20:29 | 57 |
| in re .20
I *forced* my kids to go to church when they didn't want to get up
on Sunday, all of them today have a strong sense of spirituality
that they acquired from both church and our discussions about
church. I don't expect they will all stay in our church (Episcopal)
but they are still people who believe that the spiritual is a part
of life.
and I forced my kids to be polite and not interupt when we had
company. People who meet them today think that they are some of
the nicest kids/young adults that they have met.
We also allowed them freedom of mind and freedom to talk/aruge
back. We were willing and still are to let them express opposing
points of view and read what they chose to.
But we also insisted on our family standards.
Today we have one son, our oldest who has rebelled, as is normal
for a teenager, young adult by becoming far more radical than
we are. He's also about to be a father and is in a committed
non married relationship and we love both of them and are supporting
them. He is also a very spiritual person and very committed to
helping peole, we are proud of him.
Son #2 is much more conservative than we are and far more than
his older brother. He's still involved in the church, and is
actively involved in politics in college. We expect one day that
he'll be governor with his brother protesting outside the state
house. We are proud of him.
Daughter #�1 took confirmation, and teaches Sunday school, both
by personal choice but doesn't truely belive. She has not used
her intelligence in high school, but is now working to get into
college. She is turning into an excellant semstress, and has a real
gift for working with people. We are proud of her.
Son # 3 is mildly retarded. He has continued to try and learn as
he has gotten older. He is a very loving child and has recently
become an acolyted at church (tho he has trouble sitting still
through the service when sitting alone and can't be trusted to
carry a lighted candle in a holder because he fidgets too much.
We are very proud of him.
Daughter # 2 Is 13, she is currently flunking 2 subjects and uses
bad language to us. She enjoys being an acolyte, she is active
in church youth group, she is a total slob, and she is a typical
early teen. we are very proud of her.
Restrictive, rule organized childhoods do not turn out puppets, but
give kids a basis to form their adult lives on.
I agree very much with what Steve said about parenting. (and I think
his son is a pretty neat kid!)
Bonnie
|
1114.23 | If it isn't a parent's job, whose is it? | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | BLUSH | Mon Dec 03 1990 11:14 | 11 |
| RE: .22
Cheers, Bonnie! It is nice to see parents who haven't been snowed by
the "if you love them, you will let them do whatever they want"
mentality (or maybe theories?) that seem so rampant today.
I have many problems with my parents, but for one thing I am eternally
grateful: they cared enough to raise me with a respect for society and
other peoples feelings and "space".
E Grace
|
1114.25 | My Mother's "Three Ls" | GODIVA::bence | The hum of bees... | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:15 | 5 |
|
"Love, Limits, Let them grow up."
clb
|
1114.26 | Let children be children so they can be adults | HYEND::LINNELL | | Wed Dec 05 1990 23:20 | 57 |
| I have 3 children which I send to a Waldorf school. I like their
approach which tries to give each children an personal experience of
history. For example, look how writing is developed. In grade 1 they
would use several fairy tales - told from memory, not read. Another
day the children would draw a picture that they mentally formed. It
might be Rapunsel letting down her hair. Then the teacher would find
an "R" in the picture and outline it. This would be, not the letter
"R" but the Rapunsel Letter. Later combinatorics would take these
hieroglyphs and create each child's name. Later still would come
writing and still later would come reading thereby giving the child an
experience of history.
Its very important to realize that we all go through stages in life.
What was once a 7 year cycle, from birth to change of teeth to puberty
to adulthood and so on has been decreasing to now less than 6 years.
Girls are having their first period at an earlier and earlier age.
Emotionally they are not yet there when their bodies are. I believe
this is because we HURRY our children to adulthood, ask them to think
like adults (see .13) when their not ready - this harrassment of
childhood affects their physiological development.
Just as it ruins a flower to force it to bloom before its time by
ripping off its outer sheath, we are adversely affecting our children
by rushing them to think, feel, and act like adults. Why rob them of
their childhood?? Much foundation building takes place then. Let them
live in a world of fantasy - it will emerge as adult creativity later.
As for the school debate in earlier replies - I believe that the child
needs an authority of truth in the ages 6-13. But it has two or three
or more. It has the home(s), the school, and the church (if any). If
these are in conflict with one another, this undermines the child's
trust in truth or in meaning to life. Once the child has a foundation
for loving the truth then let them go and discover the truth in the
ages 14-adult-old age. Yes, I support a choice program for schools but
choice requires variety not just a choice of different manifestations
of the same principle - materialism.
Do any of you know the history of the "public" schools. I'm extending
this for those of you who are interested:
The public schools emerged from the Common School
Movement which from the 1830s to the 1870s was largely and
anti-Catholic movement. Ironically, the educational issue
that divided Protestants and Catholics at this time was over
how to teach the Bible in school. Riots ensued in districts
that allowed the Catholics to use their Bible and related
instruction - riots that burned homes and left scores dead.
Protestant parochial schools were wide spread into the 1840s
when unequal taxation issues were raised by Catholics.
The issue was "resolved" by refusing public funds from go-
ing to either parochial school. Instead, public funds went
to a "common" public school that already was Protestant in
essence. "Public" schools in this period and well into the
20th century were run by Protestant clergy. The NH Consti-
tution required all public teachers to be "Protestant" un-
til stricken as no longer relevant in 1877.
|
1114.27 | | TRACTR::HOGGE | Dragon Slayer For Hire...Crispy! | Fri Dec 07 1990 09:03 | 35 |
| Well, I guess you asked for it... and believe me I am aware of the
impossibilities with this but here is what I would change.
Our entire social structure... is backwards in my opinion.
Here is the basic change I would make then I'll explain the benifits...
Skip the problems with it. We all know it can't work still....It's
a nice idea in theory.
Our society is backwards in its structure of working from (aprox.) 16
years of age until retirement at age (aprox.) 55. I would change it
so you don't start working until age 55 and continue until you are
either too old to actually work or die.
Here are the benifits.
First of all.... parents would be around ALL DAY to spend time with
there children during the years they are needed most and can give a
much higher degree of influence on the children.
They would be young enough to enjoy fully the things that we wait until
retirement to do. Imagine being able to travel and do the things our
parents/grandparents do now...plus the advantage of being able to do
them with our children.
Now the oldesters have advantages to... when they retire after a while,
many of them feel they no longer are capable of being "useful" if they
are working and filling positions during this age, then they are not
only being useful but the older folks have the memories of a full life
to reflect on in there old age.
I know it won't work for a lot of different reasons but wouldn't it be
nice?
SKip
|