T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
970.1 | | MSD36::RON | | Fri Feb 23 1990 18:46 | 23 |
|
> ... if I choose to have a baby out of wedlock, shouldn't it be
> mine and my boyfriends decision and not anyone elses?
Absolutely. The decision is yours and your boyfriend's and no one
else's.
Of course, in forming that decision, you may wish to take into
account the way it affects the other people you love. In that
context, you could come to realize that --just for your mother's
happiness-- you are willing to make a sacrifice by making some
concessions. While balancing your wishes against your mother's
happiness is up to you (both) alone, you should consider all
ramifications while deliberating.
If your final decision is not to get married, I wonder if an open
'heart to heart' talk with your mother will not help her see things
form your point of view.
Good luck.
-- Ron
|
970.2 | | AITG::DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, nice person | Fri Feb 23 1990 22:06 | 8 |
| >> How do I convince her that the decision is mine? How do
>> I tell this friend that I don't want her to discuss my personal
>> business with my mother any more and that if she wished to continue
>> discussing my personal business, that she should talk to me?
Print two copies of .0 and hand one to each of them?
Dan
|
970.3 | Give her time & try to understand her concerns | RELENG::MARRA | | Sat Feb 24 1990 12:26 | 45 |
| Do what you feel is best for the "three" of you. I've been in
circumstances somewhat similar to yours. I've been divorced for 17-18
years and starting seeing someone about a year after the divorce. My Mom
didn't approve of my situation initially but she didn't outright try to
tell me what to do. She did talk W-I-T-H me (not T-O) me about her
feelings, but the decision about my relationship was mine and she
respected that. We've never had children together but each have two
children from a former marriage. For us that was enough. We didn't
want anymore. I'm happy to say that 16-17 years later I'm still with
the same man and we're still happy. About 2-1/2 years ago we bought a
home together and are still happy. We've been through some hard times
(if you read note 969 you'll see some of the hard times) but we hang in
there together. I'd like to be married but he doesn't want marriage
today. He feels as you and your gentleman friend feel ---> that you
don't need that certificate to make your relation better or to make
either of you love the other more than you do now.
Give your Mom her space and let her have her opinion. I heard in a
movie I saw recently that "opinions are like assholes, everyone has
one!" Love your Mom, but give her her space. Try not to let her
trouble you. Once you have your little one she'll come around ....
maybe more than you want her too! Can you involve her in helping you get
ready for the baby? Maybe she needs that involvement and to feel that
she's actually doing something to help you ... her baby! We all tend to
forget when we grow up that we once were someone's baby. I didn't mean
to sound harsh above. Just trying to get a point across and to try to
help you realize that you've got to do what is best for you. All mothers,
myself included, want to protect our children, no matter how old they are.
Our love for our children never goes away. I'll bet your Mom is concerned
that if your relationship sours that you'll be alone, no money, no place to
live, whatever .... Try to look at the situation through her eyes.
You're going to be a Mom soon and you'll understand that
"protectiveness" that comes out in a parent. Don't close her out or
push her aside. Instead reassure her that you appreciate her concern
for you and the baby, you're happy the way you are and marriage isn't
going to make you any happier, the baby will be loved and taken care of
and she'll be able to see the baby often. Babies have a wonderful way
of making us realize that life once was so sweet and innocent and we
can't stay angry.
Just give her time, your love and your patience and understanding as
well. Watch, she'll come around. It's just going to take more time.
Virginia
|
970.4 | it is your decision | GIAMEM::MACKINNON | Pro Choice is a form of democracy | Mon Feb 26 1990 08:44 | 45 |
|
Lori,
I agree with the others. The decision is between you and the father
of your child. However, by being an unmarried single parent you
are throwing alot of other factors in to the pot. I am not saying
that you and the father are going to end up separate. And I hope
for the child's sake that this never happens. But each of you has
to look at all of the implications.
Being a single parent legally you have 100% custody of the child
regardless of the level of involvement of the father (in Mass).
This can only be changed if and only if you agree to it. You
should really speak to a lawyer about drawing up an agreement
before the child is born. One of the reasons I say this is
because if you are not married the child's medical expenses are
not covered under the father's benefits unless it is stipulated
in a legal document. This may vary so I would check into it.
Also being a single parent you are the only person who can claim
the child as an exemption on your taxes. This is a small nit but
can add up to big bucks in the long run. This too can be changed
but only if it is stipulated in a legal document.
My boyfriend has gone through all of this and beleive me he still
wishes that he and the mother had signed an agreement before the
child was born. Because once the child arrived the mother suddenly
realized that she held all the cards. She had the right to tell
him when he could and could not see the child. Mind you their
circumstances seemed quite different than yours. But a child
does change people. Some are can deal with the changes and some
can not. It is much better to be prepared than not.
I wish all three of you the best. You must be very excited about this!
Keep telling your mom you love her, but you are adult enough to make
your own decisions. Also, tell her that having a child is not a
good reason to get married. I would definately wait until after the
child is born and you both are accustomed to the situation. Then
look at getting married if that is what you both want.
God Bless,
Michele
|
970.5 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Mon Feb 26 1990 11:52 | 9 |
| I would not be concerned if my daughter had a child "out of wedlock"
as long as I knew she made enough money on her own to raise a child.
If she didn't, I would want her to get married so that the father
would be legally responsible for helping to support the baby. So
many women have suffered trying to raise kids on their own that
it seems a natural enough concern for a mother to have.
Lorna
|
970.6 | in Mass you don't need to be married | GIAMEM::MACKINNON | Pro Choice is a form of democracy | Tue Feb 27 1990 10:09 | 12 |
|
Lorna,
In Mass it doesnt matter if the parents are married. The father
is still legally responsible to pay child support if the mother
pushes for it. Of course the "father" is the person listed as
such on the birth certificate. There is no proof required that
listed father is paternal father. The burden of proof is on him
if he needs to take that course. Definitely unfair, but still the
practice.
Michele
|
970.7 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | still haven't found what I'm lookin for | Tue Feb 27 1990 16:36 | 12 |
| Re .6, That's interesting. I was under the impression, I believe
from a note I read a couple of yrs. ago in womannotes, that a mother
had to have permission from the father before she could put his
name on the birth certificate, and that if he wouldn't give permission,
she would then have to take him to court (a paternity suit). Maybe
that was a different state?
(I don't know, because, thank god, the problems never cropped up
in my life)
Lorna
|
970.8 | Stick To Your Guns! | CHEFS::HAYESD | | Wed Feb 28 1990 06:50 | 26 |
| Lori,
I had to deal with this situation this time last year, with my
SO's parents. His mother even sent us this letter, pleading with
us to get married, "I don't want any stigma attached to the baby,"
and so on, which was like emotional blackmail. Needless to say,
we didn't get married "just for the baby's sake", as far as we are
concerned we have made enough of a commitment to each other, and
didn't need a piece of paper to prove it. Now Lauren is nearly
5 months, and they adore her, but I still feel the pressure is
there whenever we see them. But we feel this is our decision, and
although other people's feelings are important, it's you that
matters, and at this stage you don't need others trying to pressurise
you into doing something you don't feel ready to do. I can understand
in a way that 30 years ago this was not 'the done thing' and it
will be difficult (if impossible) to change your mother's attitude.
But don't let it spoil your relationship with your mother, and try
to involve her in everything you can to do with the baby, having
a first one is very special
good luck!
Donna
|
970.9 | in case of emergency | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Wed Feb 28 1990 14:16 | 8 |
| While I agree with all the "it's your life comments" there may be some
legal considerations. If you aren't married and something serious
happens medically your lover may not be allowed to see either you or
the child and will not have any say in your treatment. I thought this
was one of the big issues with homosexuals wanting to be allowed to be
legally married and why just living together wasn't enough. Maybe
something like a power of attorney or some other legal document takes
care of this. liesl
|
970.10 | an update..... | JAIMES::BARRL | Black Velvet, if you please | Thu Mar 01 1990 12:41 | 33 |
| First I'd like to take this opportunity to thank all of you for
your replies. After I put this note in on Friday, I was still teed
off at my mother for making my whole day a miserable one. I tried
to calm down about it, but until I got it completely off my chest,
I knew it was going to grate on my nerves. As soon as I got home
I called my mother and told her just how I felt. I told her that
I had discussed our conversation with Steve and he felt the same
way I did. I also told her that I was sick and tired of her allowing
other people's opinions to sway her feelings. We both got very
angry and the argument got a little overheated and it ended up with
her hanging up on me. I decided that I wasn't going to call her
and I knew in time she'd call me as if nothing was wrong.
Well yesterday I was home not feeling well and the phone rang.
You guessed it, it was mom. She started the converstation with,
"Hi, are you mad at me?" (In a very whinny, guilty sort of voice.)
I told her I was never mad at her and that she was the one who hung
up on me. She than said "I hung up because I was tired of listening
to you yell me. I appreciate your opinion and I was only trying
to let me know what my opinion is. I realize that you're an adult,
but I only want what's best for you, and I'm sorry if you got angry
at me for that". I told her that I wasn't mad, but I'd appreciate
it if that from know on, she'd discuss her opinion with me first
before she got other people involved. She agreed and the rest of
the conversation (1 hour, at least) was quite pleasant. She even
told me that she saw some cute baby things on sale at Building 19
and that she wanted me to come over on Saturday so we could go shopping
together.
So like everyone said, give her her space and she'll come around.
Thanks again,
Lori
|
970.11 | How do men feel? | RAVEN1::STUBBLEFIELD | | Sat Mar 10 1990 13:53 | 12 |
|
I'm curious to find out how many men would agree to let their
girlfriends have a baby out of wedlock and yet want to help in
child rearing and financial support. THis would be an ideal
situation as far as I'm concerned.
Melinda
|
970.12 | It might be nice, but... | DEC25::BRUNO | Beware the Night Writer! | Sat Mar 10 1990 14:23 | 10 |
| For those who don't feel marriage is for them, the only problem I
see is the one already being discussed in another topic: the bias of
the courts. Should this relationship go sour, it will be even easier
for the guy to get financially shafted than if they were married.
The already faint chance of the father getting custody of the child
would become completely non-existant in the absence of a legal union.
If I was a woman, however, I would LOVE such an arrangement.
Greg
|
970.13 | | AKOV11::BHOLLAND | | Wed Mar 14 1990 16:39 | 17 |
| re. .11
Agree to "let" their girlfriends have a child out of wedlock?
How could any man force a woman (girl) NOT to have the child if
she wanted to?
How do you define "help" with child rearing and financial support?
In a marriage, hopefully you have daily commitment and caring for
the family as a whole, childcare included.
In a live-in relationship even without legal marriage hopefully you
would have this.
If the father is not there fulltime, married or not, maybe he could
participate in the child-rearing, but he'd have to work pretty hard
at it.
?? Beth
|