T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
960.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Feb 06 1990 10:51 | 9 |
| What does your divorce settlement say about the house? I'm guessing it says
that your ex is responsible for the mortgage, but that you retain a half
interest in the house until it is sold. If this is so, then a default on
the mortgage may well indeed affect you.
I'm also guessing that you didn't use a lawyer for the divorce, or else you'd
ask these questions of him/her. I'd recommend you find one immediately.
Steve
|
960.2 | If the note is in both names, you could be had | COMET::PAPA | Send Lawyers, Guns and Money | Tue Feb 06 1990 15:20 | 6 |
| If the house is in both names on the note then you are
responsible to the bank. the only way you could legally get out
of it would have been for her to get a new mortage. It dosen't matter
what the divorce settelment said or weather or not you signed a quit
clame deed. If the house goes down so does your credit rating. If she
sells it you need to sign the papers as well as her.
|
960.3 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Wed Feb 07 1990 04:08 | 4 |
| I had my ex's name removed from the contract by simply showing the quit
claim deed now she never existed as far as both of us are concerned.
-j
|
960.4 | Handle this NOW. | VCSESU::KINNEY | | Wed Feb 07 1990 11:55 | 7 |
| Get an attorney immediately. Go back to court NOW. Try to arrange
your support payment whereas YOU WOULD PAY THE MORTGAGE every month,
and whatever is left over (Support Obligation minus Mtge Payment= sum
paid to ex-wife for support). This has been done. You could arrange
for this especially since she is not thinking/acting realistically.
Don't delay - take care of this NOW.
|
960.5 | food for thought .... | DPDMAI::PULLEN | | Wed Feb 07 1990 17:06 | 38 |
| Hi, Just jumped in here and saw your question -- I work for lawyers
and have for years -- and thought I might give you some ideas. A lot
depends on the state law where you live, for one thing. Usually in
divorce cases, even if the division of property is agreed upon, the
court requires some kind of written statement of that division to
determine if it is fair and equitable for both parties. The court
ultimately decides whether the division is fair or not, and can alter
that agreement if he/she chooses.
Sounds to me like this may be a case of your wife having a lawyer and
you not being represented. That's bad news, all the way, my friend.
If that's the case, my suggestion is to at least go to Hyatt's Legal
Services for a cheap consultation and advice on how to proceed from
here. If you don't want to do that, and you've already signed the
settlement agreement, on the date of the hearing for the final decree,
be present, so you can voice your objection to it to the judge and tell
him you were not represented by counsel and did not understand all the
particulars when you signed it, and that you do not feel it is a fair
division. That will at least give you time to do some negotiating.
If I understand you, she quit-claimed the house over to you, but you
are allowing her to live there, is that right? If that's the case,
unfortunately you, and you alone, are responsible for the mortgage.
Did she agree to pay a portion of the mortgage? If not, get that added
to the settlement. It's not unusual for the wife to continue to live
in the home, but there is usually an agreement that if and when the
husband (owner) decides to sell it, the wife will be paid some amount
of money for her community interest, depending on the state laws where
you live.
On the other hand, if you want to get down and dirty, you can always
her that if she doesn't use some maturity and common sense, you'll
sell the house out from under her. I'd think that might give her food
for thought.
Ronda
|
960.6 | March into hell for heavenly cause! | SONATA::ARDINI | | Thu Feb 08 1990 07:12 | 69 |
| Thanks all!
I am all wrapped up in the legal implications and the personal side
of this issue. I appreciate all the advice from the legal aspect and I
am indeed talking to my lawyer about it, but I am also torn about the
old "co-dependent" issues.
The divorce papers state it is my X's responsibility to pay the
bills but my name is on the mortgage so there are some changes that
need to be made there. I will be getting the legal ball rolling in
respect to this today. The suggestions around paying the mortgage and
then supplying the difference in child support is fine but it all boils
down to the same thing, my X needs another source of income to survive.
Now for the more personal, confrontational aspect of the problem.
Last night my X came over to discuss the problem (I live in the same
town). She broke down, crying, in despair and this always gets to me.
So, as is my character, I held her and comforted her. Typically this
is where I give in and 'give away the store' as they say but not this
time. I offered her a solution. She asked if I could help her with
the mortgage just for this semester of school. I said I am willing to
pay the mortgage in addition to the regular child support on one
condition. The condition is if she is willing to sign a document
saying that all the money I pay will be deducted from her share of the
equity once the house is sold, reguardless of when that is. She said
'NO!' so I said, 'NO!'.
I told her this is her problem and I do not want her to make it my
problem. She has to live upto her responsibilities. Signing the
agreement would not free her of her obligation but it would enable her
to follow her present plan of going to school. I said I am willing to
help her but I am not willing to 'enable' her to shun her duties. She
was insistant on custody of the kids to the point of 'suicide' if she
didn't get them. I said this is what you wanted and if she wants to
change that I am more than willing to get custody which of course
includes the house and all the financial obligations that go with it.
By this time we are at volume 9 (out of 10). This is when she pulled
out every big gun she had. She kept saying that I was doing this to
her out of revenge and evil and I will be the one hurt if she defaults
on the mortgage. I told her I am going to insure that I am protected
if she does and she can't hurt me, only herself. I told her she has to
grow up and survive before she can entertain the luxury of being a full
time student. She absolutely refuses to change this. That's your
decision but you'll have to accept what goes with it. In the old days
I would have given in and paid it all without anticipating pay back but
I stood firm this time and it felt right.
Now we are at volume 10. She said I was sticking a knife thru her
heart. She then kicked me in the family jewels and slapped me. My
first instinct was to rip her head off but I didn't. I literally
'Turned the other cheek' and said if that makes you feel better do it
again, so she slapped me 3 more times. Take in mind that I am 6'6" and
she is 5'1', but she still has a hell of a right hook. Inside I felt
like I did the right thing but I am still wondering. My lack of
lashing out at her made me feel uneasy. Was I saying in a big way that
this time it's different and you are going to have to sleep in the bed
she made for herself or am I putting her in such a defensive mode that
she is going to start using the kids as a power move. She has said she
would never do that but all the rules and promises go out the window
when the intensity level is this high.
Am I doing the right thing? Is this one of those things that is
good for you reguardless of the pain? Or did I just sign a declaration
of war? Has anyone out there dealt with these issues before, not only
from the legal aspect but also the psychological side of it and how did
it turn out for you?
I hope I'm Right!
George
|
960.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Feb 08 1990 08:40 | 6 |
| I think you did the right thing, George. I admire your courage and
strength. You made her a perfectly reasonable and generous offer
and she refused it. As you already suspect, though, the worst times
are probably yet to be.
Steve
|
960.8 | | BIGIST::XTINE | and another one down... | Thu Feb 08 1990 08:47 | 22 |
| George
On the face of it your wife is wanting to have her cake and eat it... but
without knowing both sides it is difficult to understand why.
The most reasonable suggestion is that you "lend" here the money and she pays
you back from the equity.
I cannot see why this is unreasonable to her, unless she feels that this
situation has been foisted on her and so she can't see why she should be
reasonable...
It might help for you to talk together with a third-party to stop the discussion
getting so emotional.
We found that talking it out with the Building Society manager helped as he
has no 'sides' but has the interests of getting an affordable solution.
Xtine
|
960.9 | | LYRIC::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Thu Feb 08 1990 09:50 | 14 |
| It seems she is a woman used to getting her way, and may have
difficulty with the fact that she can no longer get you to do what she
wants. Buckle down and hang tough - be compassionate and understanding
but stand fast.
Sounds like you did the right thing to me. Make SURE the lawyers know
if she starts getting irrational and using various
emotional/financial/responsibilital weapons against you. If she
threatened "suicide" if she didn't get custody - it sounds like she's
kind of unbalanced and it would be wise to be careful about what she
pulls next, especially if it involves the kids at all (as you said).
-Jody
|
960.10 | Be careful | COMET::BOWERMAN | | Thu Feb 08 1990 10:10 | 22 |
| In my last divorce We discussed and were willing to use mediation.
(We would pay a third party to make sure no one lost control.) I would
hope that in the future you would utilise this method. I hope it would
cut down on the physical abuse you have had to endure up to this point.
Irreguardless of your size you dont need to put yourself in a situation
that requires your literally "turning the other cheek".
I think you have offered resonable solutions to her problem. I beleive
that you have been patient with her whims and any agreement you make
with her needs to be documented with another court apearance or a
notorized paper with the agreement spelled out on it.
I would consider a restraining order for your residence. By meeting in
a public place or with your children present she is more likely to
maintain control. If she loses control you will have witnesses and
they could be nessesary if she desides to be nasty or accuse you of
assault. Her hitting you could have been her way to try to get you
to lose control and use the situation for her advantage.
I think you have shown remarkable restraint. Keep up the good work and
dont allow her to 'get to ya'.
janet
|
960.11 | all that grown out of lost love | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Thu Feb 08 1990 15:39 | 6 |
| When my husband and I split up I left with just my pets and personal
belongings. He kept everything we had worked together to achive.
Friends have been telling me to fight and get a lawyer. After
reading notes like this I KNOW I made the right choice to get out
and leave the goods behind. No amount of material possesions can be
worth what you are going through. I feel for you. liesl
|
960.12 | The joys of divorce | SPCTRM::BISHOP | | Fri Feb 09 1990 13:25 | 16 |
| Five Bucks & a Blood test to get married - a FORTUNE to get divorced!
Distribution of Assets... I am assume you got the standard 50 -50
split on the house. If you go to the mat over this house - that
is (delinquent mortgage payments) you can kiss your share of this
house goodbye! Along with your credit rating - regardless or not
if your ex is being realistic - she is not and you will pay also
- you need to contact your lawyer and get a re-assessment
of the agreement. OR just pay the mortgage for a few months until
she finishes the semester. The net value of this house is going
to increase if you are really interested in your share one of you
will have to bite the bullet.
|
960.13 | She'll sign, begrudgingly! | SONATA::ARDINI | | Tue Feb 13 1990 07:00 | 12 |
| A few days after the confrontation I described in reply 6 my X
called back and apologized for the physical attack. I said I was sorry
it happened and she felt she had to do it. She then said she is
willing to sign the paper for this month but is dropping out of school,
selling the house, and plans to get out of here as soon as possible.
We agreed it would be OK to move to any area reachable by me easily on
weekends. Of course she thru in there that I destroyed her soul by
doing this to her. In the meantime I talked with my Lawyer and set up
the paperwork. It's becoming clear to me that my X's Motus Operandi is
one 'threats'. I'm becoming knumb to it all.
Thanks for all your feedback...............George
|
960.14 | Retreat or Fight?!!!! | SONATA::ARDINI | | Tue Feb 13 1990 14:09 | 19 |
| Here we go again! My X had afew real estate people come in and
they told her we can't get anything for the house right now but in a
year it should be allot better. So she says she got screwed by this
deal and it's not fair. She says she is going to just move away and
leave it all behind. She says I am going to lose big time as far as
credit and equity loss. I explained I am getting my name taken off of
the mortgage and will protect my credit but will lose the equity. I
was talking out of my hat a bit but I will not sit there and have her
threaten me like that. So now she starts saying I can't see the kids
without 24 hours notice and it will be every other weekend that I see
them. The way it is now my kids can't stand not seeing me every other
day. And she used to say I don't take the kids enough and she deserves
a break from them. So now with these threats which go against every
thing she has said I have no idea what she will say next.
How do I handle it? Just take it one day at a time or should I
just retreat until it cools down?
George
|
960.15 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Feb 13 1990 15:29 | 4 |
| Why are you asking us instead of your lawyer? The sooner you move to
establish your legal position, the better off you'll be.
Steve
|
960.16 | Good luck | NEADEV::THOMPSON | Always Dreaming | Tue Feb 13 1990 15:42 | 5 |
|
What .15 said. Get it all legal and quick.
Steve
|
960.17 | Guidance not Legal councel! | SONATA::ARDINI | | Tue Feb 13 1990 18:35 | 19 |
| Rest assured that I have been tallking to my lawyer almost daily.
We are preparing paperwork to start contempt of court hearing on here
for her failure to meet her obligations. The legal side is rolling
along and I am covering my butt. I have asked my lawyer about these
issues and get the same message each time. That message is "Nail Her
To The Wall!!!' I will not do this if I don't have to.
When I use this medium I am asking what I concider to be a very
expierienced group of people what has been their stories and what they
have learned. For the lessons life has offered you all I assume there
is wisdom to share with us all. For those that have 'Nailed Their
Spouse to the Wall did you regret it later?, Do you think you would
have handled it differently if you could do it again?, What's the good
side and what's the bad side?, Did your kids resent your actions and
did your spouse poison their thoughts about you? How old were your
kids at divorce time and how have they adjusted? Did you use a weaning
off period or was it shockingly fast? This is tyhe guidance I seek!
George
|
960.18 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Wed Feb 14 1990 04:23 | 9 |
| Regret? Only in that I diden't get a video copy of her face when the judge
told her she was awarded nothing except for the bills she had created since
our seperation $20K! She thought she was going to screw me but good but she
got it instead.
My ex tryed playing games with me and got away with it she tryed playing the
same games with the court and just 'got it'.
-j
|
960.19 | Are you all working for the legal profession? | FENNEL::GODIN | Hangin' loose while the tan lasts | Wed Feb 14 1990 08:47 | 28 |
| George, I understand and empathize with your need for guidance and a
sharing of experiences. I just wish I had some to share with you
(well, I have the experiences, but no answers yet).
I'll repeat a question I've asked previously in this file: what's the
big deal about lawyers? In my experience they tend to respond like
George's lawyer -- "Nail them to the wall" -- without regard for human
feelings and emotions and the human relations (that is the name of this
file, isn't it?) backlash caused when two people who once loved each
other and have produced children together go their separate ways. In
my experience laywers are OK (not great, but OK) for legal advice. But
they're lousy when it comes to the human side of things, and I don't
trust any of the ones I've dealt with to have anything but dollars as
their concern.
I hope I'm wrong.
Looks like my ex is playing one on me, too, and I may end up back in
court before the year's out.
Anyone know a good lawyer in Massachusetts? (That's a SERIOUS
question.)
Good luck, George. If it helps to know you're not alone in this type
of situation, be comforted.
Karen
|
960.20 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Wed Feb 14 1990 09:21 | 18 |
| George -
I, too, wish I had better answers for you. For the record, my son
was not quite 6 when we separated, 9 when we (finally) went to court
for the divorce. We were able to keep the lawyers out of it until
we knew what we wanted firmly enough that all we needed was our
wishes put into legal jargon. (We also had one lawyer advise both
of us when we originally separated, to let us know what issues we
needed to cover.)
My over-riding question, at all points along the way, was "What
is best for *our son*?". I frequently subordinated my wants to
what seemed best for him. I believe my ex did the same. It doesn't
sound like you are in that place, but if you can concentrate on
the *kids*, on their needs, perhaps you can minimize (not eliminate)
the pain and agony.
Alison
|
960.21 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Feb 14 1990 10:55 | 25 |
| Re: .19
I (and presumably others) have been advocating using a lawyer, not as
an offensive move, but as a defensive measure. When one deals with
dissolving a marriage, an institution that has perhaps the most complex
legal ramifications of anything in our society, it makes sense to find ones
way through the maze of traps with the help of someone who understands the
system and who can protect your interests.
This does not mean "nailing to the wall" - which is an act of revenge, and
I don't believe that revenge has any place in a divorce. However, no
matter how fair and rational you are, your ex may NOT be so and may indeed
have revenge on his/her mind, and your ex may not hesitate in the slightest
in finding the kind of lawyer often referred to as a "shark". You owe it
to yourself to protect your rights in the legal system, and the way to do
that is to consult a competent lawyer and heed his or her advice.
Now that we have gotten that out of the way, my advice to George would be
NOT to attack in kind, but to follow a conservative legal path that gives
away nothing, protecting his rights and his sanity. This should be possible
without "nailing her to the wall".
Be compassionate, but don't be foolish.
Steve
|
960.22 | "For every thing there is a season..." | FENNEL::GODIN | Hangin' loose while the tan lasts | Wed Feb 14 1990 12:33 | 35 |
| Rat hole alert -- re. -.21 (QUARK::LIONEL)
Steve, just in case my diatribe against lawyers was misunderstood, I
want to go on record as saying I fully believe ANYONE facing a court
appearance for ANY reason should be represented by a lawyer of their
own, and most definitely should NOT share one with their opponent.
My comments in .19 were aimed at the US judicial system and the many
lawyers who USE it to benefit their own glory or their own wealth -- or
to perpetuate the status quo -- rather than to seek justice. I believe
it's money grubbing lawyers more than money grubbing complainants
that have created a situation where two adults dare not resolve a
conflict without resorting to legal advice to make sure their a**es are
covered.
I'm not saying George's situation SHOULD be handled without consulting
a lawyer. I am concerned that by far the majority of responses to his
-- and similar -- questions have advised seeking legal advice rather
than seeking a less adversarial approach, such as a neutral-party
counselor.
I'm glad to hear there are some lawyers who, when consulted, will
advocate less confrontational responses to conflict. Unfortunately,
that hasn't been my experience.
Speaking from my own experience, and from the experience of others I
know, it's the "nail 'em to the wall" attitude of the lawyers that so
frequently turns a friendly agreement "to divide the property and go
our separate ways" into a protracted legal battle that ends only when
both sides have no more money to pay the legal fees. The lawyers are
the only ones who win.
Now, back to George's problem....
Karen
|
960.23 | Picking up on a point overlooked... | WHRFRT::WHITE | Too late to die young... | Sat Feb 17 1990 13:32 | 12 |
|
Re: .6?
The most disturbing thing to me in this whole exchange is that George(?)
was physically assaulted by X. Why were not the police called and a
complaint for assault sworn out?
If it were the other way around, had he struck her, you can bet that he
would have found his *ss in the slammer in no time...
Bob_who_is_letting_some_anger_at_unfairness_in_society_sneak_out
|
960.24 | | CONURE::AMARTIN | Teenage Mutant brat pukes! | Sat Feb 17 1990 21:14 | 5 |
| I dont think it was overlooked Bob. It was seen and igno.
You know as well as we do what would have happened.
|
960.25 | | LUNER::MALLETT | Barking Spider Industries | Sun Feb 18 1990 19:10 | 11 |
| re: .23 (Bob)
� If it were the other way around, had he struck her, you can bet
� that he would have found his *ss in the slammer in no time...
Not necessarily; if an assaulted individual, man or woman, elects
not to call the authorities, there will be no legal action. It
seems to me that without other information to go on, the most
likely explanation is that George elected not to call the police.
Steve
|
960.26 | | VMSZOO::ECKERT | I had too much to dream last night | Sun Feb 18 1990 19:42 | 8 |
| To pick a nit or two:
Assault is a willful *attempt or threat* to inflict injury upon
another person or any intentional display of force which gives the
victim reason to fear or expect immediate bodily harm. There is no
physical contact involved.
Once physical contact occurs, battery has been committed.
|
960.27 | more advice | AKOV11::THEROUX | | Thu Feb 22 1990 13:02 | 26 |
| I thought I may add my two cents. I was divorced in 1971 and at the
time was told to take my husband to the cleaners. We had four children
who were from 14 to 8 years of age and I had minimum child support, no
alimony. I was the one who asked that the children and I be allowed to
stay in the house until they were grown and then the house would be
sold with the proceeds split in two. I also assumed all expenses for
the house, all he paid was the child support $60 a week. I had a lot
of advice I did wrong (especially when he defaulted on the child
support) but I did what I could live with. Even when he disappeared
after a year and half after the divorce, at least I could live with
myself and that is what is important.
The children and I survived (I later went back to court and was given
the house out right - 5 years later) and I have no regrets to being
fair. All this to tell you that do what feels right in your gut, if
you nail her to the wall as people are suggesting I think you will
spend too many hours wondering about it.
The only part I would definitely fight for is seeing the children, my
children did feel the loss and they are grown and are just resolving
this.
Not sure this helps but hang in there.
Take care Pat
|
960.28 | Defaulting Now!!Help! | SONATA::ARDINI | | Fri Mar 02 1990 16:36 | 28 |
| I am the author of this note and will continue the story. I made
my X the offer I suggested earlier and she took it but now it's almost
too late.
I agreed to lend her the monies she needed for bills, especially
the mortgage for which I would accept payment out of her share of the
equity of the house once sold. She agreed to this 2 weeks ago and I
gave her $500 which was the balance necessery for the Feb mortgage
payment. Rather than making the paymeny she decided to treat the kids
and boyfriend to a couple of days in Portsmith N.H. which included
costs for a motel, resteraunts, and basic fun. She says to me the next
week she still needs $500. I was so angry I didn't comply. Then the
equity loan was due and I paid that, $135.
I got another desparation plea from her this week, I gave in. I
don't have the money so I applied for a personal loan thru the DCU and
was denied because of the due payments and possible bad credit building
and I have a bad Income/debt ratio. So I can't get a loan to pay my
overdue bills because I have overdue bills.
I sit here with a need for atleast 3 grand just to get things back
to level zero and I don;t know what to do.
I'm really at my witts end on this one. Any advise around where I
could get the needed money or some other avenue to resolution would be
appreciated.
George
|
960.29 | | WFOV12::APODACA | Oh boy. | Fri Mar 02 1990 16:50 | 16 |
| Uh, pardon the brevity and the curtness, but it sounds like you're
getting hosed by your ex. Why do you keep giving her money when
it's obvious she is not using it as it is intended? It sounds to
me like you're going to end up digging your own financial grave.
You *gave* her the $500 you agreed to. What happens if you give
her more and she goes out on a fun weekend again? Are you just
going to keep giving until _voila!_ she finally uses the money to
pay of the debt, and meanwhile, YOU'VE got the bill collectors after
you?
I think it sounds like you've got the draw the line.
At your wallet.
---kim
|
960.30 | huh? | NECSC::ELLIOTT | making peace with the peace | Fri Mar 02 1990 18:50 | 21 |
| The ex needs a job and you need some boundaries.
She treated the kids and the boyfriend to a nice time and you have to pay?
Why? My ex would laugh his face off if I ever came to him with this
scenario.
What are you getting from all of this anyway? You're overly responsible
towards her and enabling her irresponsibility.
I agree with the previous reply. She's hosing you and you're allowing it.
You're not a victim, you're a volunteer. Put your hand down the next time
she asks for someone to come to the front of the class and work the
problem out on the board. tell her to figure it out herself.
Let her face the consequences of her "mistakes" and her behavior will
change then. Until then, she's going to drain you of everything you have
and it will a decision you had an active part in.
/s
|
960.32 | | CONURE::AMARTIN | Save a Dolphin, Sink tunaboats! | Sun Mar 04 1990 12:38 | 22 |
| Um, .30... please reread his entries.....
He is only doing this (partly I believe) because he doesnt want to have
a poop for credit rating. Incedently, his name IS on the morgage, so
if she defaults (pretty inevitable anyhow IMHO) hell get the hosing,
not her.
As to you George, .30 wasnt that far off the mark, your rating is
getting hosed real fast, do something and quick. Contact the legal
department, or even the EAP as Mike suggested, what can it hurt?
It can only help if not at least emotionally.
She's doing you in and you're allowing it. Stop her or for ever hold
your piece....
no, it wasnt misspelled, I ment it that way....
as in a piece of your behind.
Good luck pal. Hope things get better..
AL
|
960.33 | It's not that I don't trust you BUT... | BSS::VANFLEET | Keep the Fire Burning Bright! | Mon Mar 05 1990 09:26 | 6 |
| If you should decide to help her again - pay the creditors directly and
get her to sign a note saying that she borrowed the money and for what
purpose. Something I learned a long time ago - get everything in
writing, i.e., CYA!
Nanci
|