T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
756.2 | <Everything is Speakable> | BEING::DUNNE | | Wed May 10 1989 16:29 | 11 |
| Joyce,
I think any two people can have any kind of relationship that
is mutually agreeable. Why not talk to your friend about the
fact that your interest in him is platonic? If you don't know
him very well, he has no reason to assume that your feelings
are not platonic, and you could tell him as soon as you know
him a little better.
Eileen
|
756.3 | The direct approach works best for some | HYDRA::ECKERT | Jerry Eckert | Wed May 10 1989 16:44 | 13 |
| re: .0
> And then we have the problem of establishing a platonic relationship
> with someone where there is no impediment to a romantic relationship.
> Do we just go up and say "HI, I would like to have a platonic
> friendship with you!"
Sounds like a good idea to me! I've never been very successful
at figuring out what someone is thinking unless they tell me
directly, so I appreciate it when they let me off the hook early.
Of course, I also realize this theory looks better on phosphorus
than it works in practice. Sigh...
|
756.4 | tell him. | REFINE::TAYLOR | You're worth your weight in m&m's | Wed May 10 1989 17:02 | 12 |
| That's basically what I do. I make it clear to a male friend if I only
want the relationship to be platonic. I have a lot of friends who just
happen to be male. Some of them are very close friends. I have never
had a relationship and I don't ever want to. Not because of them, but
because it would ruin the relationship that have.
Joyce, be up front and honest with him. Tell him that you would love
to go out for a walk some time, but explain that it is only as a
friendship. You don't expect (or want) anything more than a
friendship.
Holly
|
756.5 | Be Honest | FDCV10::BOTTIGLIO | Some Teardrops Never Dry | Wed May 10 1989 17:04 | 14 |
| One of the keynotes of friendship is honesty - therefore, when
dealing with a friendship, let the intention be known and agred
upon right at the outset.
Some times there is no choice, thus no problem -i.e. electronic
friendship with one who lives humndreds of miles away, has little
risk of becoming anything other than platonic.
When there is a choice, it is important that both parties know
and
agree on the platonic status.
Guy B.
|
756.6 | | LDYBUG::GOLDMAN | He who laughs, lasts | Wed May 10 1989 17:19 | 19 |
| RE: .4
> ... I have never
> had a relationship and I don't ever want to. Not because of them, but
Uh, Holly, you didn't *really* mean what you wrote, did you??
(I think you forgot the "with them"?? ) :-) :-)
I have to agree with previous replies...talk to him. I've
asked a male friend to go out, and mentioned it would be "as
friends", and I've had the same done to me. Actually, it makes
things easier, because then you know exactly where things stand,
you don't have to worry what the other person expects, etc. You
can just go out and have fun (or stay in, whatever).
As in all kinds of relationships, it seems, communication is
the key.
Amy
|
756.7 | Honesty - the *best* policy! | TSG::LEE | Stay out of my psychoses! | Wed May 10 1989 17:31 | 14 |
|
I generally agree with the trend so far - I think it's important
that you let him know that you want things to be "just" platonic
*before* any misunderstandings occur. Why take the risk of losing
a good friend over a misunderstanding? As far as telling him, I'm sure
there are as many approaches as there are people. Just be honest
and calm about it, and things will be fine.
What's the good of having a friend if you're uncomfortable when
you're around them?
>>AL<<
|
756.8 | platonic relationships are be great too | COOKIE::DOUCETTE | Chuck, DBS/CCAS/Vortex/Babelfish | Wed May 10 1989 17:36 | 17 |
| RE: <<< Note 756.6 by LDYBUG::GOLDMAN "He who laughs, lasts" >>>
> Actually, it makes
> things easier, because then you know exactly where things stand,
> you don't have to worry what the other person expects, etc. You
> can just go out and have fun (or stay in, whatever).
I have to agree strongly with what you've said. Romantic
relationships are exciting and challenging and friendships
are comfortable (but can be fun to). It's much easier to
relax and be yourself with friends. I've had
some relationships start out to be potentially romantic
and they've turned into great friendships. Women have great
insights into relationships with other women and are can be
more comfortable than men talking about certain things.
Chuck
|
756.9 | ex | CURIE::LOBOV_TEMP | | Wed May 10 1989 17:38 | 7 |
|
This may be the cowards way out...I sometimes can't SAY face to
face to someone what I feel. In that case I by a card. I hae
seen several...."I like you as a friend" or "it's nice having a
friend of the opposite sex". Works for me!
Linda
|
756.10 | Those big 'C' and 'H' words again | CREDIT::BNELSON | It's SHOWtime! | Wed May 10 1989 17:48 | 22 |
|
Joyce:
*Always* be honest -- without honesty, you can't have trust. And
without trust, you don't have much of anything. I'd say something
like: "Say, would you be interested in <whatever>. I have to be up
front with you however, and let you know that I'm only interested in
doing so as friends." You'd be surprised -- people generally aren't as
put out as you might think. Certainly, *I'm* not.
Communication *is* key, no matter who you're dealing with. What I
can't figure out is if it's so well known, why doesn't it take place
more often? I guess the implementation is harder than the theory.
I'd go talk to him! You'd be no worse off, right?
Brian
|
756.11 | mistakes, mistakes. | REFINE::TAYLOR | You're worth your weight in m&m's | Wed May 10 1989 17:49 | 5 |
| Uh, oops! Sorry about that. I meant to say that WE have never had a
relationship, and I would never want to.
Holly
|
756.12 | | ISTG::KLEINBERGER | Wild Thing, I think I love you!! | Wed May 10 1989 19:24 | 14 |
| But then again.. there was this time I asked a guy in our building
if he'd like to have lunch while we were both working in the building
on a Saturday, and he jumped down my throat telling me he already had 1.5
girlfriends...
Geez... I only wanted lunch, not to marry him...
But back on the topic, I've had to clearly state up front that I
only wanted to be friends...
I think the hardest thing I've found is how to be friends after
you've been more than friends... that's still a realm I'm trying
to define....
|
756.13 | What to Do/Say? | ATPS::GREENHALGE | Mouse | Thu May 11 1989 10:00 | 21 |
|
Thanks for writing this note, Joyce. I've been pondering over
something similar for about a week and could use some advice. So, if I
may...
Here's the scenario: High school girl has crush on high school boy.
Looking back girl sees what a fool she made of herself. Twelve years
go by and she runs into a friend of the person (electronically) she had
the crush on. The friend doesn't recongnize her name because it's a
married name.
Here's my question: With intentions only being to strike up a friendly
conversation such as "Gee, haven't seen you since school. What have
you been up to?", how would you do it? Keeping in mind that for this
person to recognize you, you would have to jog the memory of something
you really would like forgotten.
Suggestions???
- Beckie
|
756.14 | difficult but worth it - be HONEST | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Thu May 11 1989 12:13 | 29 |
| When I meet someone I like, and I'm not interested in a relationship,
I will mention, at some point, casually if possible, that fact.
In ways like, "It's really nice to have a friendship without any
pressure for anything more." or "I'm still hurting from my last
breakup...(etc, explanation)...it's so nice to just be friends with
people." Sometimes, if someone doesn't realize they are making
me uncomfortable with something, I'll indicate that I feel that
action goes with a relationship, which I'm not looking for. It
feels really nice if someone double-checks that you're not looking
for a relationship, and it's really really hard for me to put myself
first, but I feel genuinely glad when I can say, "No, I still don't want
a relationship, but you're really special and I really like you
a lot, friend."
Then again, sometimes either you or the other person still want more
than friendship, and it just won't work to keep the friendship because
there's too much tension, and your perceptions and reactions are tainted
by memories/feelings/comparisons from the past....and then you have to
decide whether to keep it up or let it slide back into
acquaintanceship.
It's very difficult. Made more difficult by the fact that people
have different definitions for "friend" activities and "relationship"
activities.....clarification may be embarassing, but communication
is VERY key (I'll echo what others have put forth) to maintaining
a friendship that is comfortable for all...
-Jody
|
756.15 | Heed your need, not your greed | BRADOR::HATASHITA | | Thu May 11 1989 14:00 | 21 |
| My best and closest friends are women.
There were never any expressed rules of friendship and we never
drew boundaries on our expressions of friendship. They developed
as naturally and as effortlessly as the any friendship I ever had
with a man.
Since I can hug, kiss, hold hands with, and walk arm in arm with my
female friends, they are more important to my sense of well being than
any male friend I have ever known. I can expose weaknesses to them,
divulge my fears to them, and be more human with them than societal
rules will permit in the presence of other men.
Somewhere along the way the question of our relationships degrading
into anything less than platonic ones became unthinkable.
I don't think I could have developed or maintained these friendships
if anywhere along the way either one of us had to say, "This close,
but no closer."
Kris
|
756.16 | Anonymous reply | QUARK::HR_MODERATOR | | Thu May 11 1989 14:28 | 71 |
| The following note has been contributed by a member of our community who
wishes to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by mail, please
send your message to QUARK::HR_MODERATOR, specifying the relevant note number.
Your message will be forwarded with your name attached unless you request
otherwise.
Steve
I've been reading this notes conference for several months, but this is
the first time I'd made an entry. I'd like to respond to the base note
about platonic friendships by stating my own experience. It's somewhat
lengthy, but hopefully, it'll be an appropriate response.
I've had a male friend for the past nine years. I met him here at DEC
and have worked with him for most of those nine years. We did spend much
time together (outside of work) and I always thought of him as only a
good friend. During that time, he experienced many tough times in his
life. He went through several operations (one was extremely major where
he could have been left paralyzed) and also his girlfriend would leave
him whenever he had medical problems (which hurt him very much).
At those times when he was extremely depressed, I WAS the one who was
ALWAYS there for him and would take the time to tell him and convince him
that, even though he was extremely depressed and hurting very much
emotionally, there was reasons for him to live, that he was a good person
and that there was someone who truly did care about him. Well, in the
process of trying to convince him, I ended up convincing myself about
him and obviously, I fell in love with him. We always thought of
ourselves as "just friends". However, I felt as if, at times, his words
and actions indicated that he thought more of me than just a friend. And
I also thought that he might realize one day that there was ONE person
who was ALWAYS there for him, during both good and bad times, and that
person was me. But, in fact, he never did come to see that cause he is
now back with the same girlfriend who has continued to hurt him very
badly. I still think that he just didn't know what to do with me cause
he was NOT used to having someone who was good, honest, trusting and
faithful to him.
I never wanted or wished this to happen, but it did. At this point, we
have trouble in being just friends. I cannot continue to stand by
him and give him support when he continues to be hurt by her, cause in
the past, it just tore my heart to see him hurt so much emotionally. I
cannot continue to have him accept all the emotional support and love
from me and continue to try to work out a relationship with her.
What I'm trying to point out by entering this response is to just be
careful with your male friendships. During those nine years, all I ever
tried to do was be a good friend for someone I cared about and what ended
up happening was that I lost a good friend, my best friend and also the
only man I have ever loved in my life. I do feel somewhat bad that I
cannot continue to be a friend, however, I can't continue to give him so
much love and when he feels good about himself, he literally avoids me
and tries working out another relationship with her -- I had to step out
of the "cycle" we were in. I have feelings too and need that love
returned also. Perhaps that's why there's the old saying, "I've loved
you too much to ever just be a friend."
I do wish that your friendships are a lot more pleasant than mine turned
out to be. Yes, perhaps being open and honest with your friend might
make things easier, however, a couple of times in the past, my friend
said to me "I love you" (and used those exact words), now he says, "I
only loved you as a friend"! You're right .14, people do have different
definitions of friendship activities vs. relationship activities and
that's definitely what we experienced.
I know this was quite long, but thanks for letting me share my experience
with you - I hope that never happens to anyone!
|
756.17 | define relationship/platonic? | YODA::BARANSKI | life is the means, love is the ends | Thu May 11 1989 15:21 | 31 |
| RE: .15
Kris... why do I always agree with your notes a lot, but disagree with your
ending? :-)
I too prefer not to "define" my relationships, and would rather just let them be
what they are. It is always nice to know what people need/want out of a
relationship and what they cannot/willnot give/put up with, but that can be done
sensibly without being brutal.
I like it when relationships do develop naturally, and grow. If it comes to a
point where one person has to say "NO", then you've obviously gone too far. I
would like to think I would know before the other person well enough beforehand
to know whether they will like or dislike something.
But perhaps I'm expecting too much? Perhaps I'm expecting to be able to read
their mind? Maybe... Sometimes things need to be spelled out. But I am
very definitely against defining what my relationship with someone is going
to be before I get to know them.
I like women friends for many of the same reasons Kris does..., yet... there
are sometimes that I can't be open when I might like to. Because I don't
know how it would be taken, and I wouldn't want to impose....
RE: -.1
Have you ever stopped to consider that by you helping him, you are helping him
stay with her in what should be obviously a bad situation by now. I've been
there. You may have to stop supporting this.
Jim.
|
756.18 | tough stuff... | WITNES::WEBB | | Thu May 11 1989 15:22 | 36 |
| .16
You did a wonderful and caring thing... and I can't help but think
that you did know what you might be walking into. It's too bad
that it ends up hurting so bad that you can't still love freely.
This stuff isn't very easy, and for some of us it is harder than
for others, but I've been coming to some realizations that I think
apply. 1) That you can never make someone love you, 2) that love
in expectation of a return of a certain kind probably doesn't work,
3) that you need to be clear about where you are and to communicate
that -- secret unrequited love is a bummer, and 4) that you can
have feelings (loving someone or being attracted to them), you can
talk about those feelings or not, and you can act on those feelings
or not... that you have choices at each step along the way.
For me to feel that "I love you" and that "I want something more
from this relationship" doesn't mean anymore than that... there's
no requirement for you to respond or for me to do any particular
thing... and if you don't, then you don't and it doesn't mean my
feelings are wrong. Sometimes it hurts or gets uncomfortable, but
I guess I'd rather end up keeping a caring friend than dump it because
she doesn't feel the same way about me that I do about her.
Now, being human, I don't always handle this as well as I'd like...
but I do try to keep working it that way.
Bottom line -- I find it a lot easier to deal with someone who is
clear with me about where they are and what they are feeling, even
if it is not what I might want, than to have this all under the
table and not talked about straightly.
My opinion... FWIIW...
R.
|
756.19 | Don't form expectations in advance | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Spring is the time of the Maiden | Thu May 11 1989 15:57 | 19 |
| re .16
I admire you for being there for 9 years for someone who was "just
a friend" for most of that time. I agree that you've probably done
the right thing by ceasing to support him in this (apparently) hopeless
relationship with his girlfriend. You need to realize that you
can't make someone love you, he may have issues of his own where
he doesn't want a good relationship. It's too bad that you can't
just be there, get what's available in your friendship, and develop
other friends and SOs to fill in your other needs.
I think the main mistake here was forming an expectation that he
would leave his girlfriend for the person who was always there for
him. By setting up expectations, you're setting up for a fall.
It's much better to give what you're comfortable giving, accept
what comes back, but don't expect any particular outcome.
Take Care,
Elizabeth
|
756.20 | let friendships bloom, not build | SELL3::JOHNSTON | weaving my dreams | Thu May 11 1989 16:30 | 28 |
| How to have a platonic friendship? Just do. It may not stay that
way -- in life there are no guarantees. Know your limits and be
honest about them.
I have a little bit of trouble with the 'have it all out in the open up
front', though. I have never wanted to start _any_ personal
relationship by setting down the terms and conditions, let alone a
friendship. It all seems so contractual somehow.
I know what I want from relationships/friendships and I know my
limits. I give people the benefit and respect of expecting that
they will too. We don't always have matching needs, and if the
relationship isn't moving where we want it to be [together or
separately] then choices arise.
There's an ebb and flow to relationships as there is to human needs.
Limits shift.
I have and have had many friendships that I would characterise
as 'intimate' -- only two have involved sex. When the relationship
ebbed away from this physical intimacy, one friendship didn't 'mend,'
the other did.
'_just_ a friend?' no.
Friends are too special,
Ann
|
756.21 | Clear the air first ... | FDCV01::BOTTIGLIO | Some Teardrops Never Dry | Thu May 11 1989 16:47 | 19 |
| When starting a relationship, if there is some absolute limit
you want to adhere to, it is best to make it known, and obtain
agreement at the very outset.
As a married person, should I pursue a friendship with a woman,
it would be far better to waive the friendship because of a conflict
of interest than to start a friendship, allow feelings to develop,
and then have to be in a position where someone has to say NO.
Yes - there is a need for spontaneity in developing human
relationships, but there is also room for honest discussion before
it's too late. I don't think clearing the air up front will stifle
the relationship to follow.
Just a humble opinion from one who thinks honesty is paramount
in human relationships.
Guy B.
|
756.22 | easier said than done | IAMOK::KOSKI | Why don't we do it in the water? | Thu May 11 1989 16:49 | 9 |
| I don't think that developing/maintaining a platonic relationship
is as easy as just saying the words. I make it very clear to my
male friends that I am happily involved with someone and that our
relationship is none other than platonic. Yet, I feel a need
to keep a certain distance with these platonic friends because to many
of these friendships disolved because someone wasn't listening to
the "just platonic friends" part.
Gail
|
756.23 | | SELL3::JOHNSTON | weaving my dreams | Thu May 11 1989 17:22 | 21 |
| re.21
As a married person myself, I concur. Honesty is indeed best. Perhaps
my approach to friendship is different.
While I'm not renowned for being self-effacing, I just never had enough
ego to presume that a man would want to be 'more than friends' without
even knowing if he liked me as a person. [Note: casual encounters
would, for me, fall into a separate category not being discussed here]
The friendships I pursue now begin no differently than before I
married. I know my limits. Others know theirs. And they become
apparent fairly early on.
If a friend questions my motives in spending time with him, I will tell
him why I do -- more often than not followed by some query as to his.
Sanity checking as it were, checking for alignment. When there is a
conflict, it's either compromise or choose.
Ann
|
756.24 | not listen to society...be yourself...natural. | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Time to live your dreams... | Thu May 11 1989 18:47 | 46 |
|
Kris (.15) could have written this reply for me, simply
substituting "men" for "women".
My closest, most intimate friends have always been men.
When a true male-female friendship develops I don't think
I've ever had to "draw the line". It's natural, it's
wonderful, it's effortless....it just happens.
With men I don't feel the competition that exists when I'm
are friends with women. I find that the most appealing thing
in a male-female friendship. With women, there is almost
always the sub-concious competition, be it for men, for
grades (in college), for status, for whatever....it's there
and I don't like being a part of that.
I can laugh with, hug, hold and kiss my male friends without
worrying that they will begin to feel something for me. It's
unwritten....it's understood. To the naked eye, many people
do see my male friendships as being more than platonic, but
they're not. I believe true male-female friends can share
everything...the expression of love being included in that
list. People may see them this way because they just don't
understand that level of sharing, of caring.
I feel I understand men more than I ever could have if my
friends were female. They understand women thru me. My male
friends know that if they need an ear to bend for a woman's
point of view, they know they can come to me...they know
it'll never go further (with women I've found this RARELY to
be true). If I need a man's point of view, I know where to
go. It's honest, it's sincere.
My friendships with men evolve into more genuine, more open.
more loving friendships than I've ever had with a woman.
They are natural...I'll never give up that 'naturalness' by
trying to 'draw a line'..........the line has always come
effortlessly and I will never give that naturalness of it up.
kath
|
756.25 | Motive | BRADOR::HATASHITA | | Thu May 11 1989 19:10 | 29 |
| Replying to .17
It's okay, Jim. I never agree with anybody on anything. Narcistic
to the max.
There's something that everyone might want to ask themselves regarding
this platonic/sexual/romantic relationship topic:
What is the motivation for a friendship?
The following are not, in my mind, motivations for friendship:
- A hopeful sexual encounter.
- A hopeful mate.
- Awaiting the breakdown of a present relationship.
The scenario, as I put it together, in 756.16 is as follows:
X waits around as a "friend" for Y to dump Z (or vice versa). When
this happens X moves in on an emotional comando raid expecting payoff
from Y for being such a good "friend". X is hurt because Y says,
"Hell NO".
That scenario, to me, borders on an insult and I would thank you not
to use the term "friendship" when describing it.
|
756.26 | but *WHY*? | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Time to live your dreams... | Thu May 11 1989 19:46 | 36 |
|
RE: .25
> What is the motivation for a friendship?
Giving, sharing, loving
Support
Sharing innermost thoughts/secrets
Companionship
I believe my list of desires for a friendship is almost
identical to my list of motivation for a romantic partner.
Or at least a large subset thereof. It may be a different
kind of love, a different kind of sharing...but the basic
rules are the same.
Companionship perhaps being the lowest on the list for a
reason. Many of my male friends I don't see or talk to for
months/years at a time....but we'll always be there for each
other.
******************
While we're speaking on the topic of male-female
friendships...there is something that has been bugging me for
a LONG time. I quite frequently get asked "so did the
romance of the century happen?" when I come back from a trip
back east to visit friends. (This bothers me to no end!)
*WHY* does society today put such emphasis on the fact that
there MUST be romance between a man and a woman?
Let's not just discuss how to define the line, but WHY the
line is there!
kath
|
756.27 | Hmmmmmmm | CARDIF::BROWN_RO | Haven't I seen dejavu before? | Thu May 11 1989 19:56 | 20 |
| re: the anonymous noter # 16...
This relationship triangle sounds unhealthy for not only the noter,
but for everyone involved in it; I wonder about the noter's need
to stay in a relationship where her own needs are clearly not being
met. This seems to be the issue, not whether or not the relationship
is platonic or not.
Dear Anonymous,
I don't know whether you have heard about co-dependent relationships
but there are some excellent books on the subject. Many women I
know have been helped by the book "Women Who Love Too Much" although
co-dependent issues are certainly not experienced by women alone.
Another such book is "Codepedent No More" by Melodie Beattie.
Check this stuff out. I think you will find it helpful.
-roger
|
756.28 | Society's old habits??? | CSOA1::KRESS | Thrown off the Dream Team | Thu May 11 1989 21:28 | 23 |
|
Kathy,
You asked why is there such an emphasis on romance.....perhaps because
it is only recently that people have more freedom to have platonic
relationships with members of the opposite sex. In the past, the
emphasis was for people (especially women) to marry and therefore,
platonic relationships were not considered important/necessary.
Old habits are hard to break.
I am sorry that you feel "bugged" by people's curiosity....I have
to admit that I've been guilty of such crimes - wondering about
friends. I tend to be a curious individual - I have found that
it is better to keep it to yourself and wait until the friend tells
you personally. You may want to keep in mind, that people do mean
well and wish you only the best.
As ever,
Kris
|
756.29 | all IMHO I assure you | NOETIC::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Thu May 11 1989 22:14 | 33 |
| < While we're speaking on the topic of male-female
< friendships...there is something that has been bugging me for
< a LONG time. I quite frequently get asked "so did the
< romance of the century happen?" when I come back from a trip
< back east to visit friends. (This bothers me to no end!)
< *WHY* does society today put such emphasis on the fact that
< there MUST be romance between a man and a woman?
< Let's not just discuss how to define the line, but WHY the
< line is there!
There are a lot of reasons kath. Certainly part of it is that men
and women are attracted to each other and one of life's great
pastimes is to find out who's seeing who and why and doing what.
(of course *I* never indulge in idle gossip, heaven forbid! ;*})
Back to your question, the line is there because we can only give
of ourselves sexually to a select number of people (I realise this
is IMHO) and there has to be some way to differentiate those
relationships from others.
We distinguish between friends on any number of criteria but sex
is a major dividing line because of the level of intimacy it
involves. Since the major traits I look for in both friends and
lovers are quite similar it would seem natural to me to think that
someone's close friends of the opposite sex (that's my
heterosexual bias showing I'm afraid) might end up as lovers or
loving friends even without a "great romance". Each friendship has
it's own boundaries and limits.
Friendships can involve sex or not. It depends on the persons
involved, but to me the potential is there and it seems strange to
deny it. liesl
|
756.31 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Starfleet Security | Fri May 12 1989 08:12 | 58 |
| re:.13 (Beckie)
� Here's my question: With intentions only being to strike
up a friendly conversation such as "Gee, haven't seen you
since school. What have you been up to?", how would you do
it? Keeping in mind that for this person to recognize you,
you would have to jog the memory of something you really
would like forgotten. �
What would I do? I'd probably try being real contrite, saying something
like, "Remember the person who blah, blah, blah way back when? God,
I feel so embarrassed thinking about what I fool I made of myself."
re:.15 & .25 (Kris)
Like Jim, I agree with just about everything you say. My closest
friends have almost always been women for the same reasons you
cite (as well as reasons that Kathy cited about competition, etc.)
But also like Jim, I question your last sentences.
� Somewhere along the way the question of our relationships
degrading into anything less than platonic ones became
unthinkable. �
Degrading? What is degrading? The friendship is what it is. The
fact that a friendship may take on a non-platonic aspect doesn't
necessarily degrade it.
� X waits around as a "friend" for Y to dump Z (or vice
versa). When this happens X moves in on an emotional
comando raid expecting payoff from Y for being such a
good "friend". X is hurt because Y says, "Hell NO".
� That scenario, to me, borders on an insult and I would
thank you not to use the term "friendship" when describing
it. �
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but the inference I'm making is
that you think that any platonic friendship that takes on a sexual
aspect is the result of X just wanting to get into Y's pants.
I agree with Liesl that it's silly to deny the *potential* for a
sexual (or even romantic) aspect to develop in the friendship. I
think the potential is there, and should be acknowledged, not
because of lack of control over one's hormones, but because it
represents a physical desire for the same sort of emotional sharing
that the friendship is based on. When I'm that close to someone,
there's always a feeling of wanting to be able to share *everything*
with that person.
That doesn't mean I want to bed every female friend of mine, but
down deep, there's always a wistful "Wouldn't it be nice if..."
There's nothing degrading about that as long as you're not looking
at your friend and seeing a side of beef instead of the person.
--- jerry
|
756.32 | my thoughts as a result of replies | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | J & J's Memere | Fri May 12 1989 08:29 | 18 |
| Another aspect of platonic friendships is the bare fact that some
people don't require, need or want them. They have SO's of the
opposite sex and friends of the same sex.
That occured to me as I read through these replies.
In line with that a platonic friendship for this type of person
could be a way of passing time until the right one came along and
the withholding of intimacy could be a form of rejection.
Another thought that I had from my own life...is it might be that
I feel that men should be friends...they are obligated it is just
a matter of deciding whether the friendship be platonic or intimate.
So perhaps the first question to ask before any relationship is
determined is 'is there a basis for friendship'.
|
756.33 | For a side note... | ISTG::KLEINBERGER | Can't *YOU* see the players? | Fri May 12 1989 08:46 | 26 |
|
.30> By the way, everyone says that honesty is important, but how
.30> many here believe that white lies are Ok? And why?
I don't know WHAT I think.. sometimes I think to protect someone,
they are okay... (ie.. me telling my girls I'm at a lounge with
a bunch of people... where there are a BUNCH of people in the lounge,
but I'm only with a certain "one" of them)... if it is to protect
one's heart at an age that needs protecting.
If it also means hurting one, versus not hurting in a situation
that really doesn't matter... (ie: That dress is lovely on you,
while you are thinking that dress make you look like a tent)...
if it makes another feel good about themselves, and it had no relevant
value later on.
To protect a loved one in a given situation (ie: when men were
at war, telling them the kids were all right, when indeed one was
being ready for minor surgery - better to not tell them the truth,
so they can focus on staying alive, and not on a sick child at home)..
I think is also all right...
Yeah, given the situation, there may be times when its okay...
Gale
|
756.34 | | ATPS::GREENHALGE | Mouse | Fri May 12 1989 10:00 | 27 |
|
Kath (.24)
I echo your sentiments exactly. I've always found it more difficult to
maintain very close friendships with other women than with men. Part
of this, I think, is what was mentioned about competition amongst women
regardless of what they are competing for.
Men, on the other hand, don't seem to be in competition with me at any
level. This makes it much easier to communicate openly and enjoy time
spent together.
Anyone that knows me knows how open a person I am. I'm that way with
everyone for the most part, but tend to clam up more with women.
Jerry, (.31)
Thanks.
Mike Z.,
I think a person's motives for telling a little white lie has to be
considered before determining if it is okay or not.
- Beckie
|
756.35 | friends | YODA::BARANSKI | life is the means, love is the ends | Fri May 12 1989 11:13 | 29 |
| RE: friendships with the other sex
A number of people have mentioned being more comfortable with the opposite sex
because of a lack of competition. Do you suppose it feels comfortable because
you know that (the opposite sex) *cannot* compete with you?
How do you think this feels to your friends of the opposite sex (FOTOS? :-)) I
can remember having one friend who had lots of FOTOS, and them being
occasionally refered to as her 'harem'; which I felt was very insulting, an
insult by implying something was going on when nothing was going on. I can't
ever *quite* feeling in comptetition with the other friends, but sometimes it
can close.
I've also heard the theory that exclusive FOTOS, is a form of ingrained
homophobia, either either fear/hatred of homosexuality, or fear/hatred of your
own sex/yourself. Comments?
RE: White lies
I very seldom tell white lies for the purpose of not hurting someone's feelings.
I wouldn't say 'that's nice, dear' about a tent dress. I'd tell the truth. I've
been called tactless for that. :-) On the other hand, sometimes I use white
lies to protect myself, to avoid telling someone something that I don't want to
tell them. Perhaps it would be more honest to say 'I don't want to answer
that', but that is even more tactless, and very difficult. But I reserve the
right to open myself to people in my own time, and in my own way. If I had my
way I wouldn't do it at all, but I find it is necessary sometimes.
Jim.
|
756.36 | Reply from anonymous author of .16 | QUARK::HR_MODERATOR | | Fri May 12 1989 11:20 | 38 |
| This is the noter who entered .16
I just read .31's response and I say thank you for understanding.
Perhaps some people didn't completely understand what I was saying. I
truly believe the "relationship" or whatever wasn't completely one-sided.
At those times, I was definitely given the impression that I was wanted,
that I was needed and that I was appreciated for all the emotional
support and love that I was giving. Never once was I "avoided". In
fact, a very close friend of both of ours has recently told me that he
felt bad for the way my friend was "using" me for emotional support and
love that his girlfriend was unable to give him and that he was getting
the best of both worlds.
I know this might sound naive, but I never once thought I'd end up having
the feelings that I did. I gave him this type of support and love
because I cared about him for the person that he is and NOT for any other
reason. I think that out of everyone (including people who knew us) I
was the last to recognize my feelings. I never "waited around" for his
relationship with her to end, but was just "there" when he had no one
else and it made me happy caring about him. Hopefully no one will get
the wrong impression that I just hung around for X and Y to break up. I
was there because of three reasons: 1) he certainly appeared as if he
wanted me to be there 2) because he certainly sounded like it was over
between them and 3) cause I loved him for being him. My friend spent
many hours alone with me telling me how she deceived him and hurt him
deeply, and he would tell others that I was the only one to ever give a
"hoot" about him. So what else was I to believe?
.17 Jim, I believe your last paragraph was directed toward my response.
Yes, you are right, even though it hurts me not to be the caring person
that I am, I must stop supporting him, which I recently have. I think
right now I'm just looking for some feedback and support about this issue
because last week, when he came to me about the emotional hurt he is
still experiencing, I told him that I could no longer help him. Perhaps
this was wrong of me in that a friend should be there, but I can no
longer continue to see him hurt because of her -- I can't be a good
friend to him because it just hurts me too much to see him hurt! Anyone
have any ideas how I can get to feel better about myself?
|
756.37 | | ACTVAX::SCHWINDT | Keeping my head above water | Fri May 12 1989 13:42 | 10 |
| Re: .30 White lies....
I don't think twice about telling white lies.... If there is something
that would hurt someone unnecessarily, I'd cover a little for it.
Why not? I'd want someone to do it for me. Sometimes I'd rather
not know all of the truth anyways... ;^>
Katie
|
756.38 | Cheese is cheese, however it may be sliced | BRADOR::HATASHITA | | Fri May 12 1989 13:59 | 46 |
|
In response to .31;
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but the inference I'm making is
> that you think that any platonic friendship that takes on a sexual
> aspect is the result of X just wanting to get into Y's pants.
My point, Jerry, is that anyone who is involved in a friendship with
an expectation of anything more than than the friendship is actually
not involved in a friendship.
In my mind, there is no difference between X going through all the motions
of friendship with Y with the expectation that a romance will develop,
and X going through all the motions of friendship with Y with the
expectation of receiving $12,000 for services rendered.
If romance develops between friends without expectation, that's different.
In that case expectation was not the motivation for the friendship.
What if the following note were posted:
I was a good friend to this lady for 6 years. I always provided
love and support. She seemed to love me back. Every time she
and her boyfriend (who's a real jerk) got in trouble, I was there.
She and her boyfriend broke up so I went to her place and, figuring
that the coast was clear, I tried to remove her clothes. She rejected
me. After all that caring and support I put in so that I could
be around when she was available, she rejects me.
I would definitely question the use of the term friendship.
Again, a friendship which is motivated by payoff, whatever form that
payoff may take, is not a friendship, but rather a gross hypocracy
masquerading as a friendship.
As the saying goes, "The only way to have a friend is to be a friend."
It doesn't go, "One way to get what you want from someone is to pretend
to be their friend."
Friendship is its own reward. Those rewards are more fulfilling
than even a romance can be.
Kris
|
756.39 | | VIDEO::MORRISSEY | Trapped inside this lovers maze | Fri May 12 1989 16:33 | 36 |
|
I have many friends who are male. I work in a male
dominated environment so it's bound to happen. Most
of them know I'm engaged to it's a lot easier.
But I do have one friend who is not in my group. And
we have a mutual attraction to each other BUT we respect
each other and I love my fiance very much so we know that
the relationship will not go beyond friendship. I feel
very comfortable around him. He's very easy to talk to
and is always there if I need a shoulder to cry on, so
to speak.
One of my best friends is a man I used to date. He is
a wonderful person. But he was concentrating on his
career at the time and did not want a full time relationship
so we decided to remain friends. He is another who is
there for me. I try to stay on good terms with "ex's"
so to speak. I find it very difficult to end a relationship
on bad terms. I go to great lengths to let a person know
that I want to be friends. Sometimes it's difficult but
eventually the hurt/confused feelings cool down and we
are able to have a stable and lasting friendship.
When I do come across someone that appears that they want
more than a friendship I kind of slip in something like..
"well my fiance thinks...." or whatever. That is if they
haven't seen the ring by then! Most of the time it works
out.
Just be honest with him (echo!). No one can have too many
friends!!
JJ
|
756.40 | Nix the lies... | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Time to live your dreams... | Fri May 12 1989 19:54 | 28 |
|
RE: white lies.
I would never lie to someone just to make them feel better.
I've been known to be painfully honest at times. I don't
want anyone to ever lie to me, no matter how small the lie.
There are ways to tell the truth, in a tactful manner, so as to
not hurt someone.
Another comment I would like to add is in regards to the
"expecting something to develop sometime" slant. I will
never say that I WON'T let a friend develop into anything
more. A friendship has always been what I have tried to base
my romantic relationship. There is, however, a distinct line
been anticipating that something will happen someday, and it
just happening without anticipation.
I am, also, very uncomfortable calling a relationship a
friendship when one of the parties keeps it going
anticipating there will someday be more.
i have so much more i want to say...perhaps this weekend.
kathy
|
756.41 | more on white lies | DEC25::BERRY | Save a tree... kill a beaver. | Sun May 14 1989 14:39 | 28 |
| Mike Z. asked a great question about the telling of white lies.
Reminds me of a story... (oh no)
In Star Wars, Ben told Luke a white lie about his father, that Darth
Vader had "destroyed" him, and NOT that he had actually become Vader.
Luke asked Ben why he lied to him. Ben said something about he
had actually told him the truth, the the truth was ascertained by
"one's own point of view."
I can also see the need for curbing the truth to protect others.
Kath said that there are ways to tell the truth, in a tactful manner,
so as to not hurt someone. I say that it the same thing as the
"white lie."
And think about this.... getting away from the person to person
white lie....
Sometimes our government must tell us white lies, or curb the
curb the truth, but most folks get very upset about that! But
sometimes it's best that "we" don't know the real truth. If
it's OK for us, can it not be OK for the government?
Good question Mike Z., and perhaps you may want to start a separate
topic on this as it's getting several responses and worthy of its
on note.
Dwight
|
756.42 | | RETORT::RON | | Sun May 14 1989 15:10 | 33 |
|
RE: .41
> In Star Wars, Ben told Luke a white lie about his father ...
What a strange coincidence. Here I am, reading notes but also
watching Star Wars, sort of over my shoulder, and a reply about the
movie comes up... Uncanny...
-------------
As to 'white lies', I suspect their prevalence is a function of
conventions in a particular culture, rather than a specific person's
preference. There are cultures where saying the truth outright, is
the acceptable thing to do, while 'white lies' are frowned upon.
In such a culture, it may be acceptable to say, "I like your new
dress", even if you think it's ugly as sin. It is NOT acceptable to
say "I really liked the job you did. However, I believe we could
improve it somewhat if ...", when the only improvement is to redo
the whole bloody thing from scratch.
In such a culture, the person hearing "You did a lousy job" is
already conditioned not to be overly hurt. The person will handle it
in a positive manner.
In **this** culture, articulating the naked truth is not acceptable.
Believe me, I know. Don't believe all those people telling you they
prefer to hear the bare truth. They are lying... :-).
-- Ron
|
756.43 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Why I'm here I can't quite remember | Sun May 14 1989 15:16 | 17 |
|
> Kath said that there are ways to tell the truth, in a tactful manner,
> so as to not hurt someone. I say that it the same thing as the
> "white lie."
I can say, "That dress makes you look like a cow."
or I can say, "That dress accentuates your hips, perhaps this
style would minimize them."
I've not lied....I've said something tactfully. There's a
difference. Sorry, I won't intentionally lie, no matter how
much the truth hurts. If I find someone has been lying to me
(even little white ones), my faith and trust in them is
dimished.
kath
|
756.44 | hit "next" or "next unseen" NOW | SALEM::SAWYER | but....why? | Tue May 16 1989 11:09 | 17 |
|
i'm not going to attempt to give my answer(s) to the question
in .o....
cus i understand that "yo...rik...who cares what you think"
however...
i do have many platonic relationships...
and as i grow (one way or the other) i find that i have more
and more of them and they become easier to establish....
i try to brainwash my kids into being able to establish
and maintain platonic friendships as a natural part
of life....
perhaps, when they are "mature adults", they'll be able
to handle many types of relationships easily....
|
756.45 | IMHO | ACTVAX::SCHWINDT | Keeping my head above water | Tue May 16 1989 12:10 | 12 |
|
Just one more thing on white lies.... Unless I actually care about
a persons opinion, I don't really care what the heck they think
or say... so whether they lie to me or not, it doesn't really matter.
Even if I do look like a hippo in a print dress :^>
Katie
|
756.46 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Tue May 16 1989 20:40 | 25 |
| I have lots of friendships that I presume to be platonic. Problem
is, I'm not very good at detecting signals. I'm usually the last
to know that two people are 'going together,' mostly because I can't
really distinguish between 'going together' and buddies at the social
level. It takes something like a physical display of affection to
get through to me. I act as if the friendships are platonic; there's
a certain amount of teasing/flirting, but nothing that indicates
that I'm interested in a closer relationship and plenty of signals
that indicate I'm *not* interested in anything closer. I usually
don't feel like spending much time with any one person anyway; in
fact, I'm cutting back on one association that's getting too intrusive
for my comfort. I try to avoid the connotation of being 'paired'
with anyone on any kind of a regular basis. The problem is that
the other half of the pair sometimes assumes that we'll be a pair
(platonic or not) in a variety of situations and I feel constrained
by their expectations. I have to either live up to those expectations
or disappoint them, a position I don't enjoy.
The reason this works (or at least, I think it works) is because
all of the friendships have started out as friends of friends or
part of a group that I'm part of. We've made the connection within
an established group, rather than as an isolated one-on-one meeting.
In this context, the default is more decidedly a platonic relationship
and it's actually a little presumptuous to assume that a non-platonic
relationship is going to develop.
|
756.47 | IMHO... | PH4VAX::MCBRIDE | Pikes Peak or Bust!!! | Wed May 17 1989 10:18 | 10 |
| There is a school-of-thought which suggests that the 'white lie'
is used not so much to protect the other person as it is to protect
the liar. The reason is that if I tell a lie the other person will
not thjink badly about me. After much thought, I personally have
found that this is the reason I do it.
As for platonic relationships. I believe that platonic relationships
are the things you have while you are waiting for Ms/Mr Right.
One surrounds himself/herself with people who don't matter, aren't
significant, to keep from being alone while you wait.
|
756.48 | They matter to me! | TSG::LEE | Stay out of my psychoses! | Wed May 17 1989 10:39 | 22 |
|
.47> As for platonic relationships. I believe that platonic relationships
.47> are the things you have while you are waiting for Ms/Mr Right.
.47> One surrounds himself/herself with people who don't matter, aren't
.47> significant, to keep from being alone while you wait.
Hmmmmmm.....that's not the way I feel about it at all!
For me, platonic relationships are important whether or not I have a
current "Ms. Right". My feeling is that platonic relationships are
important in their own right, not merely a way of "biding my time"
until someone better comes along.
In fact, it is often the complete opposite; romantic relationships
often will come and go, while platonic relationships tend to be much
more stable (or at least less volatile). As a result, they are
usually there when one has no Ms./Mr. Right, but I don't seek them out
for that reason. In particular, by no means are any of my platonic
friends insignificant to me, and they definitely *do* matter!
>>AL<<
|
756.49 | friendships | PENMAN::BROWN | upcountry frolics | Wed May 17 1989 10:59 | 25 |
| I think of friendships as dynamic and very much a matter of degree,
measured by trust, intimacy, and caring. My wife is my best friend,
and that is definitely not platonic. My other close friends are also
friends with my wife - this makes having platonic friendships fairly
easy, because one of the things these friends know about me is my
strong relationship with my wife.
For example, I met one of my friends at a previous job and we
enjoyed each others company from the start.
My wife met my new friend at a party later that summer, and the two
of them talked for about 3 hours. It was fun watching how compatible
they were. By this time, I had already met my friend's husband (he
could not make the party) and we struck up a friendship. A few weeks
later they came for dinner. The result of all of this is a lasting`
four-way friendship. Any one of the four enjoys being with any
combination of the other three.
My wife and I both have single friends of the opposite sex, and
the relationships grow in the same way. Friends are our friends
rather than exclusively my friends or her friends - even though
one or the other takes the initiative to get together with different
people, it's more of a case of habit and opportunity. Friends
are too important not to share.
Ron
|
756.50 | "I get by with a little help from my friends"... | CREDIT::BNELSON | It's SHOWtime! | Wed May 17 1989 17:43 | 15 |
|
About friendships -- I must agree with those who say they're
important, because to me they *are*. In a way, in fact, to me they are
as important as the romantic relationship: the romantic type is great,
there's no denying it, but it's your *friends* who get you through this
crazy life; you certainly can't do it alone.
I guess there's a tradeoff -- the longevity of friends against the
intensity of romantic relationships.
Brian
|
756.51 | how much load can love carry | NOETIC::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Wed May 17 1989 20:20 | 7 |
|
I dislike the concept that friends are only there till you find a
romantic partner. What a waste that would be if it was true. My
friends are there whether I have a romantic interest or not.
Besides, this sort of thinking places a large burden on the object
of your desires. They then have to fill all your needs by
themselves. I don't believe that's a realistic goal. liesl
|
756.52 | a pack of lies | GOLETA::BROWN_RO | Wherever you go, there you are. | Thu May 18 1989 18:20 | 20 |
| What is a "white" lie?
How does it differ from any other type of lie?
Lies are generally told to gain some type of advantage, or to avoid
some type of conflict, or perhaps the imagined threat of conflict.
Trust and honesty are the hallmarks of a good relationship, and to
me can be used as a measuring stick of that relationship's quality;
the degree of trust and honesty involved.
At the same time, all relationships have value, even those with
lesser degrees of trust. They all fill different functions in
life.
-roger
|
756.53 | | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Rebel Yell | Fri May 19 1989 05:12 | 10 |
|
Question:
Do you think it's possible to move a relationship from romantic
to platonic - or vice versa?
I.e. Is it a case of "once a lover, always a lover"?
'gail
|
756.54 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Starfleet Security | Fri May 19 1989 05:31 | 20 |
| re:.49
I've always felt that I want to share my friends with my other
friends. One of my friends, however, feels differently. He tends
to keep different and separate circles of friends and consciously
keeps them separate. He's never been able to explain why he does
this (I'm not sure even he knows why he does it). Different squids
for different kids.
re:.53
My rule of thumb, based on my experiences (your mileage may vary),
is that if "X" and I were platonic friends who then became lovers,
we can go back to being platonic friends if the romance fizzles.
If we started off as lovers, we can't become "just friends" after-
wards. I suspect that this is because in the first case, we know
how to relate to the other as just a friend, whereas in the second
case, we don't.
--- jerry
|
756.55 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Why I'm here I can't quite remember | Fri May 19 1989 12:43 | 16 |
| > Do you think it's possible to move a relationship from romantic
> to platonic - or vice versa?
I can only think of one instance in my life where I have NOT
remained friends with someone I was romantically attached to.
Conversely, I've rarely had a romantic relationship that did
not begin with friendship.
I think it's possible to move both ways very easily. Some
people, however, are of the mindset that you cannot be
friends after romance. That is sad indeed.
kath
|
756.56 | we're going to try it! | DEC25::LITASI | Time and Tide | Tue May 23 1989 02:15 | 15 |
|
I am in the process of returning to a platonic relationship
with a man who I spent a lot of time getting to know. We
can talk about anything and have spent a lot of time talking
about this transition. I guess it's a cooling-off period.
I have mixed emotions. On the one hand, I'll miss the physical
intimacy, yet we have a non-physical intimacy that actually means
more to me. I'll miss the cuddling the most, though.
I really hope we'll be able to maintain the friendship. I guess
I'll have to wait and see. I'm still too new to this relationship
stuff (17 years of marriage doesn't count!) ;^)
sherry
|
756.57 | Interpersonal sensitivity = 0/10 | BREW11::LAWTON | There ain't no Sanity Clause... | Thu Jul 06 1989 20:38 | 13 |
| I am somewhat distressed by the comment in ( I think ) .6, something
along the lines of "...as long as you stress that the relationship
is platonic, then you don't have to worry about how ( or what?)
the other person thinks..", and then goes on to stress the importance
of communication. This comes across as a fairly hard-nosed attitude
and more than a little uncommunicative. So what we should do, then,
if we are to follow this advice, is to state our relational intentions
and then totally rule out any change in the other person's feelings,
because we can " stop worrying about them".
Sounds a little cold to me
Phil-Who-Speaks-From-Personal-Expierience
|
756.58 | Sorry if it wasn't clear earlier | LDYBUG::GOLDMAN | Playing the waiting game.. | Thu Jul 06 1989 21:51 | 19 |
| Re: <<< Note 756.57 by BREW11::LAWTON "There ain't no Sanity Clause..." >>>
Phil,
What I was getting at was that if *both* people can talk about
what they want and expect, and agree to be platonic friends at the
start, then the expectations are set as such. (i.e. they can
relax and not worry.) Note I said both people involved. If one
person can't handle just a platonic friendship (wants more), or if
something changes along the way, I think that should be brought up.
That's where the communication is the key. Communication is two-
way...if someone's feelings do change and he/she doesn't say
anything (or do anything that would indicate a change)... how is the
other person involved to know?
I never said (or at least certainly never meant) that someone
should ignore the other persons feelings, or rule out a change!
Amy (who also speaks from personal experience)
|
756.59 | SET FRIENDSHIP/DEFAULT=PLATONIC | STAR::RDAVIS | If I can't dance,you can keep your OS | Wed Aug 16 1989 10:02 | 23 |
| Maybe it's due to having come of reason in the Naughty '70s, but a lot
of the platonic friendship debate sounds forced.
Back long ago, the last time I was single, if sexual attraction
developed, you showed it, and if the other person wasn't interested,
they said so. I lost one friend because I said no; I lost one friend
because she said no. (Those problems were mostly immaturity, I think.)
For the most part, there was no problem.
A certain amount of physical attraction can be natural in friendship.
It isn't necessary or sufficient, and it certainly doesn't have to be
consummated. But what's the purpose of laying ground rules up front if
both friends are sensible adults? A truly lustful louse will ignore
the ground rules anyway, and there's always the chance that the ruler
will unexpectedly find changed feelings towards the rulee.
Anyway, the way I've always handled it is to assume (no matter _how_
late at night someone shows up) that the friendship is purely platonic
unless explicitly stated or demonstrated otherwise. It's made some
of my sexual relationships start a little later than they otherwise
might have, but that hasn't necessarily been for the worse.
Ray
|