T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
745.1 | more support for happiness | TOOK::BLOUNT | | Mon Apr 24 1989 13:11 | 25 |
| I have a program at home that runs on my PC, and calculates your
life expectancy, based on the answers to about 15 basic questions.
The questions are things like:
do you smoke?
What is the longevity in your family?
How stressful/dangerous is your job?
How much do you exercise?
etc...
What's interesting is that the single question that seems to have
the most impact on your life expectancy is the question:
What is your outlook on life?
a. Life is a bowl of cherries...I'm always happy
b. I'm usually happy
c. I have typical ups and downs
d. Life is the pits
By varying my answers to this question, I can change my life
expectancy by around 5 years, whereas the answers to most of the
other questions (do you smoke? how much do you exercise? etc)
usually make a difference of only about 1 year.
So, the message is get happy.
|
745.2 | Not very convincing | APEHUB::RON | | Mon Apr 24 1989 15:21 | 14 |
|
Of course, it could be that successful ball players are those that
exercise and play a lot, thus leading to a healthy cardio-vascular
system, the number 2 killer of people who do not exercise and play
a lot.
In other words, longevity may (and again, may not) be linked to
success. Or ball playing.
As to the computer program mentioned in .1, have you heard about
the guy who was told by his computer that he was **already** dead?
-- Ron
|
745.3 | That factor was cleared | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | We're part of the fire that is burning! | Mon Apr 24 1989 15:45 | 9 |
|
re .2-
In the news report, the exercise factor was considered, and found
to be the about same for each of the subjects in the study; i.e.
they cleared that factor from influencing the correlation.
Joe Jas
|
745.4 | | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | Wow! It's The Abyss! | Tue Apr 25 1989 00:08 | 20 |
| > re .0, Joe Jas
> [studies] showed that the more successful ballplayers (Hitters; more
> RBI's, Pitchers; more strike outs, etc) actually lived longer lives.
Interesting idea. Makes me think of the occasions on which I've
played way over my head in tennis, ping pong, writing .... I
remember how I felt ... totally coordinated, harmonious,
whimsical, light hearted, with absolute concentration. All the
negatives were absent: no self-consciousness, no doubt ...
all together quite wonderful: a feeling of total physical
and emotion clarity. Especially a feeling of physical lightness.
The experience always crept up on me; I never realized I was
being "over my head" until the experience had been happening for
some 15 minutes or an hour. Have no idea what initiated it.
Perhaps the successful people are not so much Happy as they are
not Unhappy. (Hmmm ... anybody know about the life span of
Nobel prize winners?)
Meigs
|
745.5 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | Don't hit. Share. Clean up. | Tue Apr 25 1989 17:30 | 19 |
| I agree that people should try to have happy lives in the sense
of viewing the proverbial glass as half full rather than half empty.
People should try to find the good in things, make the best of
things, find hobbies and interests that make them happy, etc. But,
I can't help but wonder if longevity isn't mostly coincidence.
I mean, are most people who die young, unhappy? I doubt it. Were
most of the people who get cancer or die in plane crashes unhappy?
If you think about it, it's almost like blaming them for it. It's
not a coincidence that they were killed, or got sick and died, it's
because *they* didn't make an *effort* to be *happy* enough! If
they'd only have been more *happy* they might be alive today!
(First, religion threatens us that if we aren't good we won't find
eternal life! Now, health fanatics threaten us that if we aren't
happy enough we won't live long lives! If it isn't one thing it's
another.)
Lorna
|
745.6 | Good Points, Lorna! :-) | YODA::BARANSKI | Incorrugatible! | Tue Apr 25 1989 17:47 | 0
|