T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
679.1 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | set def [newyork.city] | Thu Feb 09 1989 10:40 | 23 |
|
You know what I said in MOANS, but I'll say it again here.
Its YOUR wedding and you can plan/have it in any way you
want. It seems to me from this note that you will never be
able to "please" your MIL, so, why try? Eventually she will
see that her 'ploy' to run your life is not working and she
will give up. First of all, you put who YOU want in the
wedding party. Second of all, if people don't show up for
your wedding because of something your MIL said, then maybe
they aren't the people you thought they were.
This is a time for YOU! The more you give into your MIL, the
more she will try to run your life. Stand up to her and tell
her what YOU want, she may hate you to begin with, but after
a while, she'll begin to respect you. Look at it as if she
is testing your strength and endurance.
And no matter what people say, IMHO, you're marrying *HIM*,
NOT his family. Its unfortunate that you have to live with
them in order to pay for the wedding. PLEASE do not let her
get the better of you! Stand up to her.....
kathy
|
679.2 | TELL MAMA-IN-LAW TO GO SUCK EGGS... | CURIE::LMATTHEWS | AMON, BOWIE & OZZIE WOO'S MAMA | Thu Feb 09 1989 10:49 | 25 |
| It sounds like you have a tough road ahead of you. I think it is up to
your fiancee to tell his mother to BACK OFF. If I was you I would tell
your fiancee to pack his bags, both of you move to an apartment and
rather than have a large wedding (complete with obnoxious in-laws) I
would have a small, intimate wedding and just enjoy the day.
Fortunately I got along with both of my mother-in-laws and part
of the reason is I never let them get the better of me. My first
husband and I paid for our own wedding and laid down the laws.
I know my mother-in-law wasn't thrilled about the receiption location
but tough. That is all we could afford. As it turned out everything
went fine.
My current husband and I had a small wedding at our house and had
a ball. I definitely liked the smaller wedding better. Much more
intimate and fun. Both our families were there but I made all the
arrangements - caterer, flowers, etc. and I actually was complimented
by my mother-in-law in putting together such a successful wedding.
Better try to get your husband to participate in the friction now
or else I think you know what your future will be like.
ALso, don't forget, BIGGER is not always BETTER.
Good Luck.
|
679.3 | Avoid Wedding Bell Blues | SLOVAX::HASLAM | Creativity Unlimited | Thu Feb 09 1989 11:37 | 14 |
| How about a do-it-yourself wedding? I've made wedding dresses for
both my married daughters and one friend who could never have afforded
it otherwise. I also made the cakes and did the flowers by copying
designs out of flower shops and bakeries. It's more time consuming
than costly. It also made the day extra special because everything
was done with love instead of money--a good start to a "loving
relationship." If you want more information on how-to, send mail.
One thing to consider--is it worth starting your married life
frustrated and possibly still in debt from a one day event when
you could have the fun and memories with a "down home" style wedding?
Best Wishes,
Barb
|
679.4 | | BTO::WHEEL_D | Love that Dairy Air! | Thu Feb 09 1989 11:46 | 15 |
|
When I was married, I had no problems with my in-laws, BUT
my wife was having all kinds of problems with my step-mother.
My wife wanted to keep peace in the family so she let her stomp
on her and didn't tell me about the problems until it just got
too far. We confronted my step-mom about this problem and
she admitted that she didn't realize that she was causing so
much problems. That was almost 10 years and we all get along
great.
I agree with the earlier replies. The two of you sit down
with your M-I-L and tell her what you want. It is YOUR day!
Good luck!
Dan
|
679.5 | make tracks | YODA::BARANSKI | Wit & Wisdom in 25 letters or less | Thu Feb 09 1989 11:56 | 13 |
| Step #0 How does your groom feel about all this?
Step #1 Get out of that house!
Step #2 If your mother in law is a pain, stay away from her. You don't
need the agravation. Possibly she thinks you HAVE TO put up with
her. Show her different.
Step #3 Have a wedding *you* can afford and enjoy.
Life is difficult enough... Don't make it any harder then YOU want it to be.
Jim.
|
679.7 | It's by Judith Martin | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Feb 09 1989 13:04 | 10 |
| First, get your hands on a copy of _Miss_Manner's_Guide_to_
_Excruciatingly_Correct_Behavior_. In this, you will find
authoritative assurances that the wedding *you* want IS traditional
and correct. (Among other things, you can point out that *you*
invite the guests, not she, even if they are her relatives.)
Clutching this fat, funny book firmly, follow the other good
advice you've gotten in this note. ;-)
Ann B.
|
679.8 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | set def [newyork.city] | Thu Feb 09 1989 13:10 | 35 |
|
Slap the woman across the face... oh I guess that isn't a
good idea, eh? Well, I'm sure you want to, though!
> if the wedding is not done by tradition, then it's wrong. That's
> part of the reason she's putting me through hell.
does that mean that the way you do it is wrong? No! go
ahead with your plans! Hell, My bridesmaids (if I ever get
married) are going to wear black! I'm sure I'll get hell for
it, but its MY WEDDING!
>> She ended up saying that she wasn't going to invite
>> any of her friends or relatives.
You invite them... Ask around and find out names and
addresses and invite them yourself. Chances are I bet they
come, despite her b*tching.
>> In the middle of the hug, she'll sneer over his
>> shoulder at me. It's really evil looking.
Sneer back! Don't let her get the best of you! Fight her
with her own medicine!
I'd also suggest getting out of the house, too. You don't
need that...so what if your wedding will have to go without
something...at least you'll have some peace of mind. There
are many ways to 'cut corners' with weddings. If you want to
know, send me mail. My sister's wedding cost all of $600 for
it all (of course that was 4 years ago, but....)
kath
|
679.9 | ELOPE !!! | MPGS::PELTIER | | Thu Feb 09 1989 13:47 | 27 |
|
Say the hell with everyone, and ELOPE ! Escape to someplace extremely
romantic or to a favorite place that you and your fiancee like to go,
and simply tie the knot...
This may sound boring to some people, but you can make it a very
special wedding for you and your fiancee - Remember, it is you and your
fiancee who are getting married, not anyone else !!!
Instead of spending all your hard earned money to please your
'wonderful'(said with sarcasm) mother-in-law, spend it on yourselves.
If you like the Maine seacoast, for instance, rent an elegant/romantic
room at a resort or an inn. Sip champagne in the hot top. Spend a
little extra money on the wedding night attire - go all out for you.
Don't think twice if you want to order filet mignon. Spend a few days
or a few weeks away from everyone. When you come back, you will be
married without having to go through the hasle of a big wedding.
Also, and most importantly, you will have enough money to get out of
HER house and start your own lives together.
One other option is, if she wants the wedding HER way, tell her to PAY
FOR IT !!!
Good luck...keep us posted...
Ellen
|
679.10 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Nevermore! | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:06 | 13 |
| I'd like to concur with Ann. When Tamzen and I got married, it was
anything but traditional, but it was all done according to Miss
Manners. Her book is one of your best defenses and weapons.
As a quick bit of advice, in a *traditional* wedding, it's all done by
the bride's parents, unless the couple does it themselves (including
pay for it -- the only way the couple has any control is to pay for
it). The groom's parents are there to pick up the tab on a dinner or
two, and that's it. If your future mother-in-law objects, point out
that it's *traditional* that she does nothing. Tell her that if she'd
wanted to run a wedding, she should have had a daughter. Tsk.
Jon
|
679.11 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Nevermore! | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:08 | 9 |
| re .9:
"One other option is, if she wants the wedding HER way, tell her to PAY
FOR IT !!!"
No, *don't* tell her that!!! She's *bound* to take you up on your
offer! Do *not* give the dear thing an opening like that.
Jon
|
679.12 | Is Medea the one who killed her children??? | ZONULE::WEBB | | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:50 | 27 |
| "The Dear Thing" seems quite ill to me, and what's happening regarding
the wedding is just one expression of her problems. The way in
which she is relating to her son and to you is quite unhealthy.
Given that, I doubt that there is anyway to manage, control, or
appease her. She is setting out to compete against you for her
son's affections... the "hugs and sneers" are skirmishes in her
battle for dominance in his life, and the wedding is one of the
bigger battles.
I hope he has begun to look at and work out his issues with his
mother... cuz if he hasn't, your wedding won't be the prelude to
your dreams... no matter what you do.
I feel for you... you've gotten good advice here, but it will take
a lot of courage and determination on your part, and his love and
commitment to get on with your lives together.
There is always some family acting out around the family ritual
events like weddings and funerals... some of it is just normal human
stuff... and some of it is pretty toxic. Please do what you need
to do to protect and care for yourself and your SO.
IMHO...
R.
|
679.13 | It won't go away after the wedding... | WMOIS::E_FINKELSEN | Set def [.friday_pm] | Thu Feb 09 1989 15:53 | 23 |
|
As one who doesn't get along with her mil, believe me...it can get worse. You
will be forced into her company for the rest of her life. Let me add though
that the one thing she didn't have a strong opinion on was my wedding. That may
have had something to do with the distance, they live in NJ and we are in MA.
� I say beast?)to deal with. She also has a strong influence
� my fiancee', who has been doted upon since birth. She'll hug
You need to work this out with your fiancee'. If he takes her side over yours
even in little things, it will be a strain on your marriage. My mil had that
problem with her fil. She felt 'abandoned' because my fil spent more time
visiting his mom and dad than with her and was more apt to take their advise
over hers.
I would also get out of there. If I had my wedding to do all over again, I'd
elope. The stress wasn't worth the quick ceremony. I would have liked to have
saved the money for a really nice honeymoon instead.
Ln
ps. Even though my mil and I don't see eye to eye on most things, your mil makes
me appreciate mine a little more.
|
679.14 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Thu Feb 09 1989 16:19 | 8 |
| Perhaps, you could tell her that if she doesn't behave, she won't
be invited to the wedding?
Just a thought.
:-) :-) :-) ;-)
Eugene
|
679.15 | I wuv 'out'laws... | ANT::CHARRON | boadacious isn't it? | Fri Feb 10 1989 11:54 | 26 |
|
< Note 679.8 by SSDEVO::GALLUP "set def [newyork.city]" >
"Sneer back! Don't let her get the best of you! Fight her
with her own medicine!"
I wouldn't suggest doing this in that it will bring you down to
her level...
re.- .0
My wife and I had a similar problem except it was with my sister
not my mother. She would berate my wife to my family and compete
for my affections. Ultimately I was the one who had to resolve the
situation. It came down to a choice between my wife or my sister.
I'm still married if thats any indication of my choice. Your future
husband will have to make that choice, it's something that "should"
have been settled before the wedding was planned.... I use the term
'should' loosely because I'm no counseler and I am far from perfect..;')
One last thing, it sounds to me like his mother has serious emotional
problems although I wouldn't suggest telling her that....
Brian 'can you say, throw mama from the train, sure, I knew ya
could' :')
|
679.16 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Arizona #1 -- C ya in the Final 4! | Fri Feb 10 1989 12:24 | 13 |
| RE: -.1
>I wouldn't suggest doing this in that it will bring you down to
>her level...
But she could have the satisfaction of THINKING it! Have a sense of humor,
will ya? If you don't have a sense of humor in this kind of situation,
you'll have a harder time making it through, ya know?
|
679.17 | Just think about it. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Feb 10 1989 12:35 | 4 |
| Or she could whip out a small camera, and take a snapshot of
her mother-in-law-elect just as the snear hits.
Ann B.
|
679.18 | My own wedding woes... | TLE::KRUGER | Sharon Kruger | Fri Feb 10 1989 13:14 | 22 |
| I'm in the midst of planning my own wedding, which is at the end of
July. My mother has alluded to the fact that she would like to have
both of my parents walk me down the aisle ("There are certain things
we have to let the hotel know. For instance, they'll have to leave
extra space for the aisle if both of us walk you down.") Then when
I was visiting them once, a magazine appeared on my dresser, with
a sentence underlined in red, stating that it is becoming more and more
popular for both parents to escort the bride.
I really do not want my mother taking part in this part of the
ceremony. My wedding is not very traditional - performed by a justice
of the peace - but this is one area where I would prefer the
traditional way of my Dad giving me away. But I feel as though to tell
Mom that I don't want her giving me away would be like slapping her
in the face! I know it's MY wedding, but should I just acquiesce, or
should I tell her no?
I considered writing to Dear Abby, and hoping Mom reads the letter,
but that's just a little too risky! :-)
--Sharon
|
679.19 | Keep it in perspective | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Feb 10 1989 13:33 | 38 |
| re: walking down the aisle:
Paul was escorted by his mother and her mother (a sweet little old lady
if there ever weas one, and in those days still able to do a slow hora!
- not anymore, sad to say); his father attended but not his stepmother,
which was really unfair to the stepmother (who is a nice lady) but
which would have caused WWW III among the relatives, and everyone
understood that only too well.
I was "escorted" by both of my parents, but in fact they actually
walked one pace behind me - my skirt was so wide that even one
additional person wouldn't have fit, so they were right behind the
train. It wasn't clear until the very day how much my mother was going
to be able to participate since she had just had back surgery (we had a
chair hidden in the front of the synagogue in case she needed it, but
she didn't), but I wanted them both with me if possible.
(Unfortuneately, the surgeon absolutely forbid mother to dance at the
reception... must have been the right thing since she is fine now,
seven years later.)
So, plan things the way *you* want them; most of the relatives will
eventually go along with it, and you can probably ignore the protests
of the others (diplomatically, especially if your new mother-in-law is
one of them!). This is easier to do if you and your fiance are paying
the tab; that's what we did. Paul's mother insisted on having an open
bar (most of our friends don't drink, or only drink wine, which we were
serving anyhow - it was even *good* wine considering that it had to be
properly kosher; most of our friends do not keep kosher), so she paid
for that (actually, she paid for the bartenders; the liquor was what
hadn't been consumed at Paul's sister's wedding a few months earlier -
she doesn't drink that kind of stuff either, and we didn't want to have
a bunch of it left for us afterwards - I bet the same bottles reappear
for Paul's other sister's wedding this April, too...).
Don't lose your sense of humor - weddings are stressful, even when they
are fun.
/Charlotte
|
679.20 | In all this, where is the love? | BOOKIE::AITEL | Everyone's entitled to my opinion. | Fri Feb 10 1989 13:38 | 24 |
| Honestly, I don't like that custom. I think it comes from the fact
that women used to be considered chattel, owned by a man. Still
are, some places. The father was giving control of his chattel
to the husband. I think your mother's idea is more loving, depending
on what the gesture means to her. Maybe you're thinking, "yes,
but I want to make that decision." ??? well, are you really making
that decision, in either case? In one case, your mom is giving
you her desires, and in the other case HISTORY and SOCIETY are giving
you their "traditional" desires.
I think you have to go beyond the "I want" and "she wants" arguement
to the meaning of the tradition and to the reasons for your mom's
gesture and your reluctance to accept that gesture.
In the case of .0, I would have a simple wedding and live on my
own money after it. You know you're going to have a hard time living
as a member of your husband's parents' household. You would be
the most junior member of the pecking order. In addition, your
marriage would be open to familial scrutiny. The wedding is ONE
DAY. Living with your in-laws will be MONTHS. Wouldn't it be
better to have a wedding marked by love rather than money? and
a future without the financial strain of that wedding?
--Louise
|
679.21 | Heartache and Lace Don't Mix | CSSE::SOUCY | | Fri Feb 10 1989 14:24 | 23 |
| Think about this rationally for a moment. If the reason you are living
with your future in-laws is to save enough money to pay for a wedding
celebration that is actually doing nothing but causing you heartache,
put an end to it. You and your fiance should find your own place
NOW, have a simple ceremony to your liking, and invite your future
in-laws along with whomever else you want to celebrate with you.
In so doing, you will have accomplished some critical things in
establishing the importance or your own family unit:
1. You and your SO take charge of your situation
2. You make it very clear that no one else should
It's highly unlikely that any parent would miss their son or daughter's
wedding regardless of how digruntled they may be with the future
spouse. The lines of respect need to be drawn now....not after the
ceremony.
Best of luck.........
It worked for me.
|
679.22 | | HAMSTR::IRLBACHER | Another I is beginning... | Fri Feb 10 1989 16:52 | 42 |
| I agree with .20 and .21 very much.
But I would like to offer something for you to think about.
This woman is your fiance's mother. He *loves* her, as he *loves*
you. And even if he feels that you are not getting a fair treatment
by her, he is still quite torn between the love he has for you
both. And for this reason alone, you both need to be very open and
honest with each other about how you presently feel, and what you
intend to do after your marriage when her interference might again
become a problem.
A wedding purchased at the price of dissent and unhappiness does
not predict a contented future. (that sounds like a fortune cookie
piece, but its true!) If you can minimize the friction by
getting out of that house, then *go*.
Frankly, I think you are in for some rough times with that lady.
And you might find this hard to take, but I suggest that you need
to look at what you might be doing---consciously or unconsciously---
to keep this friction at high level. No one argues alone...
So that you do not think I am pounding on you unfairly, I need to
tell you that I also had some incredible difficulties before my
marriage to my husband because of my mother-in-law. It wasn't
over a wedding, but that a wedding was taking place---in part---
because I was pregnant. *Back when I married, ***nice*** girls
got pregnant a_f_t_e_r marriage*
My husband suffered both silently and as tactfully as humanly possible
for a number of years, trying to keep the peace between us. Now
that I am older and wiser, I know that there was much I could have
done to have lessened the strife. But I was pig-headed and un-
willing to bend.
I buried that old woman yesterday was a week ago. And although
our relationship was always rocky, and her son was dead over 6 years,
I was deeply sorry to see her go.
Marilyn
|
679.23 | Compromise | BSS::VANFLEET | 6 Impossible Things Before Breakfast | Sat Feb 11 1989 16:55 | 11 |
| Sharon -
By way of compromise you might suggest that your father
walk you down the aisle but when the officiator asks
who gives this woman, both parents respond, "We do."
I did this at my wedding and it would have worked great
if my father hadn't forgotton and boomed out "I do" at
the time.
Nanci
|
679.25 | Good! | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Mon Feb 13 1989 17:09 | 14 |
| re: original question
You have things in the right persepctive, it sounds like: your
soon-to-be mother-in-law is being unreasonable, not you!
re: total side issue (what, another rat-hole?)
In a Jewish wedding, no one "gives away" the bride, anyhow. So it
wasn't that Paul was "given away" by my mother-in-law and her mother
and me by my parents. They just escorted us to the huppah (marriage
canopy). It would have been sort of nonsensical any other way - Paul's
mother lives a 2-hour drive from us, and his grandmother even
further, and my folks lived 1500 miles from here - so it wasn't any
kind of "transferring property" thing for any of them (anyhow, as I
said, we paid for the wedding, except for the bartenders and booze his
mother insisted on...).
|
679.26 | be strong | DPDMAI::BEAN | endnode on the ethernet of life | Tue Feb 14 1989 18:00 | 21 |
| it sound to me like your MIL is resentful of you because you are
a threat to her authority over her pampered son.
the best advise you have been given is:
1. separate yourselves from her... you can remain cordial, but you
must remove yourselves from her home.
2. DO NOT accede to her desires unless they parallel your own.
and even then you must be careful that she knows they are your desires,
not her own. (don't re-inforce her perception that she can manipulate
you)
3. be very sure that you and your fiance' have a clear understanding
on the role she will play in your lives.... this will be a very
sensitive issue to discuss, but your future happiness may depend
a lot on it.
4. resolve to be strong....do not allow her to control you. only
you can be in control of your life. if you allow her to manipulate
you now, she will never cease.
good luck
tony who_finally_achieved_freedom_from_manipulating_family
|
679.28 | only *you* can make *you* happy | DPDMAI::BEAN | endnode on the ethernet of life | Sun Feb 19 1989 11:37 | 20 |
| i agree that your fiance' does not have to have fallen "near the
tree"....in my own family there are manipulators...givers...takers,
the whole gamut of personalities. i happen to be a giver.
my wife was a manipulator/taker. and i tried to keep the peace.
for me...the answer was divorce. i tried other soulutions, but
none were effective. i won't say the 25 years were wasted, but,
i will say that for nearly all that time i did not know happiness.
it is extremely difficult to break out of the habit of allowing
yourself to be manipulated. even now, i have to be alert to the
knowledge that i have the propensity to give in to it. but, knowing
this...and taking steps to avoid it, i am now happier than i can
remember EVER being! there is a new life ahead of me, and i am
excited about it!
good luck.
tony
|
679.29 | You are not alone... | DNEAST::FIRTH_CATHY | owl | Tue Feb 21 1989 07:10 | 25 |
| For my first husband his MIL was "impossible" - nothing would suffice
so we gave the wedding ourselves. Going on to graduate school took
every cent so we had a SIMPLE service with a best man and a maid
of honor and the minister. My present husband has trouble with
his MIL - we both say "yes" to keep ker at bay and "do our own thing".
We give in to that extent because of a heart condition that starts
out manipulative and then she cannot control the consequences.
My MIL - I let her completely finish and say I will think about
it - and just don't do it. Fortunately (what am I saying) we are
both in the same boat so we give each other a lot of support in
this area.
In the years to come you and your fiance will have ups and downs.
If MIL controls now .... you "ain't seen nothing yet". I have 2
siblings who are completely dominated and their spouses could not
tolerate it and both marriages ended in divorce and neither has
had a stable relationship since.
NOw is the time to sit down with your fiance and make sure you are
strong enough to overcome it all. BTW I married my present husband
at home with a justice of the peace and 2 witnesses.
Good luck. Keep us posted.
Cathy
|
679.31 | Congratulations! | YODA::BARANSKI | Incorrugatible! | Tue Feb 28 1989 14:05 | 0 |
679.32 | | SSDEVO::CHAMPION | Ski Bum In Training | Tue Feb 28 1989 20:45 | 10 |
| Aw gee, Nicole - I don't think b*tch is the word.
ASSERTIVE, however, IS!!
Pats on the back for ya!
:-)
Carol
|