T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
661.2 | First things first... | PRYDE::HUTCHINS | | Mon Jan 23 1989 12:57 | 2 |
| But do they know how to fly the things!
|
661.3 | mine are pink, so it *bothers* me | DEMING::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Mon Jan 23 1989 13:01 | 6 |
|
re: .1
Natch, 'cause you wear blue booties!!
justme....jacqui
|
661.4 | | BAGELS::CARROLL | | Mon Jan 23 1989 16:09 | 2 |
| whats the point????
|
661.5 | Jealousy??? :-) | SSDEVO::CHAMPION | Animation Fanatic | Mon Jan 23 1989 18:03 | 13 |
| re - .last
I think this has to do with whether or not people feel this is a
sexist issue. :-)
Personally, I don't give a rat's u-know-what.
I just hope that the female pilots get something just as "creative"
painted on their planes.
:-)
Carol
|
661.6 | hence, the term flyBOYS??? | DPDSAL::CRAVEN | any forward gear will do... | Mon Jan 23 1989 18:44 | 6 |
| I think it's another footprint backward on that old evolutionary
trail...
WARMS THEIR HEARTS.....give me a break...I'm sure something is
getting warm, but I put my money on something else!!! hehehe
|
661.8 | Art is what you make of it. | MCIS2::AKINS | Workin' and practicn' | Mon Jan 23 1989 23:28 | 11 |
| To those who would be offended by this......
why?
Nude women have been in art for ages......In the time of the Romans,
the adolecent male was considered the "in" thing to paint or sculpt.
That was considered "sexy".
Bill
|
661.9 | | BAGELS::CARROLL | | Tue Jan 24 1989 09:47 | 9 |
| carol in .5
I agree. All pilots, male and female should be able to personalize
that piece of metal in which they may someday die.
I might add that when I was in the Air Force, it was illegal,
at least where I was, to place nude pictures (i.e. playboy pin-ups)
on the walls of your barracks room.
|
661.10 | eerie story about nude picture on the wall | HANNAH::OSMAN | type hannah::hogan$:[osman]eric.vt240 | Tue Jan 24 1989 11:34 | 8 |
| Speaking of nude pictures on cell walls, did any of you read that
novella by Steven King (in "Four Seasons"), whichs name I forget but
it's about a prisoner that has a nude picture on the wall and he
plots to escape from prision ?
An eerie but fascinating story.
/Eric
|
661.11 | oh well... | YODA::BARANSKI | Appearance? Or Substance? | Tue Jan 24 1989 11:43 | 4 |
| Unfortunately, since there are no female combat pilots I doubt that there
will be any feminine artwork on bombers.
Jim.
|
661.12 | Next generation? | SSDEVO::CHAMPION | Animation Fanatic | Tue Jan 24 1989 12:03 | 8 |
| re -.last
At least, not *yet*....
:-)
Carol
|
661.13 | | BAGELS::CARROLL | | Tue Jan 24 1989 13:42 | 8 |
| althouth there are no female "combat" pilots. They do fly kc-135's,
c-130's, c5's and other type of aircraft....as far as being in combat,
what type of aircraft do you think delivered supplies to Khe Sahn,
Vietnam during the siege of '68? C-130's ofcourse.
Although women may not fly "combat" aircraft, ask the pilots of
those planes listed above if they have ever been in a combat situation.
|
661.14 | Would I be offended? Yes | DABBLE::MEAGHER | | Tue Jan 24 1989 14:05 | 9 |
| >>> I just hope that the female pilots get something just as "creative"
>>> painted on their planes.
One reason (but only one) why there aren't many female pilots is because
the cockpit (apt name) of a plane is a man's world. And painting nude pictures
of women on planes is one way to ensure that it stays a man's world.
Vicki Meagher
|
661.15 | cockpit decomposed | HANNAH::OSMAN | type hannah::hogan$:[osman]eric.vt240 | Tue Jan 24 1989 15:25 | 14 |
|
I disagree that "cockpit" is a man-word more than a woman-word. It's
the joining of the words
cock
and
pit
If you forget about olives and think about ground instead, you can see
that the word is made of both a male and a female part.
/Eric
|
661.16 | what does it really mean? | YODA::BARANSKI | Appearance? Or Substance? | Tue Jan 24 1989 17:14 | 8 |
| Where did the word cockpit *really* come from?
The aircraft in question is bombers...
Were any of the transport planes that were in combat actually flown in combat
by women? I don't think so...
Jim.
|
661.17 | I have no strong preference *what* you paint! | CSC32::REINBOLD | | Tue Jan 24 1989 19:40 | 22 |
| re .14 I fail to see *why* a "cockpit" is necessarily a man's
world. I also fail to understand how painting a scantily-
clad woman on a bomber is going to keep female pilots out
of them. Am I naive, or is it just that, as an earlier
reply said, "I don't give a rat's u-know-what!"
cockpit n. 1.A pit or enclosed space for cockfights. 2.A place where
many battles have been fought. 3. [deals with parts of
ships, below the waterline] 4.a.The space in the fuselage
of a small airplane containing seats for the pilot, coilot,
and sometimes passengers. b.The space set apart for the
pilot and crew in a large airliner.
-American Heritage Dictionary
Early planes were open. Did they develop "cockpits" during a world-
war, when planes were being primarily used for fighting? It seems
to have a derivation from definition "2" above, for some reason.
Can someone enlighten us?
Paula
|
661.18 | The origin of cockpit | BRADOR::HATASHITA | | Tue Jan 24 1989 20:36 | 16 |
| In Old English the person who steered a sailboat was referred to
as a "cockswain". The term "coxswain" is still used to refer to the
person who goes, "Stroke...Stroke...Stroke" in the back of row boats
(I'm sure there's a joke in there somewhere).
In order to prevent the cockswain from being swept overboard during
high seas the ship's wheel or tiller was set in a recessed "pit". This
was referred to as a "cockswain's pit" since during a watch only the
cockswain was permitted to be in the pit. Since language usually takes
the path of least resistance the term was shortened to cockspit (That's
cocks-pit not cock-spit, Joe) sometime during the 18th century and
finally to "cockpit".
Now where does the term "cocktail" come from.
Kris
|
661.19 | I'd like to check your source, please | SKYLRK::OLSON | Doctor, give us some Tiger Bone. | Tue Jan 24 1989 22:58 | 10 |
| re .0, I'd be very surprised if this is true.
Among the very real problem areas would be among flight-line crews,
where the mechanics fixing, arming and refueling these beasts are
as like as not to be mixed gender crews...who could reasonably be
expected to object to blatantly sexist artwork in their workplace.
Would you mind revealing your source for this recent "announcement"?
DougO
|
661.20 | It's only a painting..... | XCELR8::AKINS | Workin' and practicn' | Wed Jan 25 1989 02:13 | 9 |
| As an art student, I don't see why anyone would be offended by nude
paintings. In class I had to draw from a nude model. In greek
sculpture there is very little clothing. There has been nudity
in art for ages. What is the problem here? I draw and scuplt nudes,
does that make me a twisted pervert? Last year at Hampton Beach,
I did a sand sculpture of a sunbather. Little Old ladies even weren't
offended. What the hell it's only art.......
Bill
|
661.21 | Not Art for Art's Sake | RUTLND::KUPTON | Thinner in '89 | Wed Jan 25 1989 08:26 | 27 |
| "cockpit" - area of staged fighting. In WWI pilots used to drop
bombs that were piled up inside the cockpit. Pilots also used to
shoot pistols and the bombadiers would fire a rifle. Remember, the
pilot sat aft of the Bombadier, who also fired the machine gun.
The area in a two seater was approx. the size of a cockpit (bi-plane).
As to decorating the aircraft: Pilots and crew of WWII bombers usually
had a sum of the parts of all of their wives, girlfriends, lovers
painted as a good luck charm on their aircraft. Others had fierce
looking objects painted. Throughout history evil looking drawings,
etchings etc have adorned head dresses, flags, shields etc. in combat.
In many cultures they were to ward off death by scaring it, or creating
fear in the enemy. The art forms also cause a sense of transferred
"love" of the person painted into a "love" of the aircraft. The
belief was also that the love of the women would protect the aircraft.
In Viet Nam it was commonplace that our flight helmets were
individualized because we couldn't paint or decorate our aircraft.
I had "Death's Head" painted on the sides of mine with snakes crawling
out of the eyes and a dagger through the skull. My name was printed
on the back with "Beast" on the visor shields. Why? I don't know,
I guess I felt that I was pretty terrible and it reflect the way
I really felt about myself.
Maybe it's just away to escape the reality of what we do....
Ken
|
661.22 | You have just crossed over... | SCRUFF::CONLIFFE | Better living through software | Wed Jan 25 1989 09:27 | 19 |
| Offered for your consideration:
The time; The present.
The scene: An airstrip, somewhere in the Twilight Zone.
You are a man, and you work on the flight line servicing and maintaining the
various aircraft. All the aircraft are decorated in some way, with various
pin-up pictures.
On the nose of one aircraft is the title "Gorgeous George" over a picture of a
nude male "hunk" displaying an enormous erection, with a 'come hither' look in
his eyes.
You have to work on the aircraft, often under the eyes of the female pilot and
her crew (possibly all female). Good pilots being what they are, you hear their
occasional comments and remarks about the sexual prowess and personal habits of
the "George" so pictured.
Would you perhaps feel a little uncomfortable?
Nigel
|
661.23 | Big Deal.... | XCELR8::AKINS | Workin' and practicn' | Wed Jan 25 1989 10:03 | 10 |
| RE:.22
I feel comfortable with my sexuality. I would feel about as
uncomfortable as a stroll through the BMFA. If it's the crude
comments about the art that bothers someone then why not address
that issue. I hardly ever hear crude comments about art in a museum.
Bill
|
661.24 | what is "blatently sexist"? | YODA::BARANSKI | Appearance? Or Substance? | Wed Jan 25 1989 10:18 | 14 |
| Would anyone care to define "blatently sexist artwork"?
In my mind artwork of an erection is about equal to a "beaver shot", the
majority of neither is "art" in my opinion. Women don't have visible erections
per se. "blatently sexist artwork"? I don't know... Either any artwork of the
opposite sex could be taken as "blatently sexist", or only art displaying the
opposite sex in a blatently submissive position relative to the other sex would
be blatently sexist. Sorry, I don't equate sexual with submissive and sexist.
Or perhaps the only sexual/nude artwork that is not blatently sexist is
homosexual artwork? :-) How would you know what sex the pilot of a given plane
was? Would homosexual artwork be substantually different?
Jim.
|
661.25 | | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Wed Jan 25 1989 12:20 | 14 |
| Re: .20
Nudity is not really the issue. The issue is the "women are merely
pleasure objects" implications of the paintings. That might not
be what the artists and pilots really believe, but the paintings
can certainly be used to reinforce that attitude.
Re: .23
So you're comfortable with your sexuality. Lucky you. Not everyone
is. Who cares if they 'should' be? They aren't. Until measures
are taken to get people more comfortable with their sexualities,
their discomfort must be dealt with. Ignoring reality is usually
non-productive.
|
661.26 | | LDYBUG::LAVEY | Tryna keep the conversation *lively*. | Wed Jan 25 1989 12:54 | 11 |
| < Note 661.10 by HANNAH::OSMAN "type hannah::hogan$:[osman]eric.vt240" >
> Speaking of nude pictures on cell walls, did any of you read that
> novella by Steven King (in "Four Seasons"), whichs name I forget but
> it's about a prisoner that has a nude picture on the wall and he
> plots to escape from prision ?
If I remember right, it was "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption."
Excellent story....
-- Cathy
|
661.27 | perhaps it is all "in the mind of the beholder... | ZONULE::WEBB | | Sun Jan 29 1989 19:37 | 4 |
| ... maybe sexist, but for some it served as a morale boosting reminder
of what they were fighting for....
|
661.28 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Abolish network partner abortions | Mon Jan 30 1989 10:01 | 8 |
| re: .27
� . . .what they were fighting for....
Or at least what they believed and/or hoped they were fighting
for. . .
Steve
|
661.29 | theres good art, and not so... | VIDEO::PARENTJ | physical>human, Logical>person | Mon Jan 30 1989 11:58 | 12 |
|
For what is worth, NOT all aircraft nose paint is sexist! I have
seen some very tasteful and tasteless nose paint that didn't even
involve depictions of humans of either sex. I judge the work like
art, which as it should be. There is good art and junk. The
difference is decided by personal standards (READ opinion).
Also respect the fact that even if it's bad art it may be part of
history for others to look back on.
just my 2 Yen, john
|
661.30 | prove your point | COMET::BERRY | Annie are you ok, Are you ok ANNIE! | Wed Feb 15 1989 07:31 | 13 |
| re: < Note 661.13 by BAGELS::CARROLL >
> althouth there are no female "combat" pilots. They do fly kc-135's,
> c-130's, c5's and other type of aircraft....as far as being in combat,
> what type of aircraft do you think delivered supplies to Khe Sahn,
> Vietnam during the siege of '68? C-130's ofcourse.
Women may or may not be flying those craft that you mentioned....
What do ya bet that the pilots of those craft were men that flew
"those" planes over Vietnam?
Dwight
|