T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
646.1 | express all your feelings | PARITY::FLATHERS | | Fri Dec 30 1988 12:02 | 6 |
|
Did you tell your adoptive mom what you wrote here? Tell her that
you love her. Hug her. Try and get her to understand how important
it is to you. I bet she's thought of this situation for years, and
knew someday you would NEED to know. Take care.
|
646.2 | I vote search | PIPE::GUIMOND | | Fri Dec 30 1988 12:15 | 16 |
| .0.
I've been doing some thinking along the same lines recently. My Mom
and I talked about it and she was very supportive. I have a sister
and 2 brother whos are also adopted and we've always said/felt that my
Mom and Dad (adoptive) are our PARENTS, the people who sat up with us
when we were sick, who drove us to school when we missed the bus and
who love us no matter what happens, so I think with that always being
the basis for our family, it really wasn't a *major* blow to either of
them.
Since we talked I have not done anything about this, basically because
I'm not sure how to go about it - do you have any suggestions?
Pat
|
646.3 | I've tried everything | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Fri Dec 30 1988 12:16 | 5 |
| I've tried everything! I hugged her cried tears with her, told her
I loved her, But she thinks "how can you do this to me and your
dad? We love you" I've replied "Yes and I love you BUT it's something
I feel like I need to do. But I hate like the dickens to have it
hurt you.
|
646.4 | :-) It might work. :-) | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Dec 30 1988 12:20 | 6 |
| Tell her you're greedy, and you want more, more, more! Another
mother to have and hoard and gloat over. More silly family
stories to tell your grandchildren. More past, more color, more
everything.
Ann B.
|
646.5 | Pointer to another conference | DMGDTA::WASKOM | | Fri Dec 30 1988 15:15 | 8 |
|
And on another note. There's an excellent discussion in
MOSAIC::WOMANNOTES-V2, note number 276 on this topic. You might
consider looking there also.
Alison
|
646.6 | Stop hurting me! Waa! Ouch! ooh! ungh! | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Take it away...Take it away! | Fri Dec 30 1988 15:19 | 35 |
|
When someone says "how can you do this to me!", in situations
like this, it's really "I cant help myself from feeling this way".
While someone always has the right to tell you how they feel, they
sure could stand to do so without directing "Blame and Guilt" at you.
After all, "how someone feels about it" is that someone's choice,
something another person can neither control nor be responsible for.
You can tell her that you accept how she feels and *would like
to* help her to feel differently about it. However, you also might
say that you'll be damned if you're going to change what you want
for yourself, in an effort to offload her own responsibility for
how she feels. As we all know, just feeling how we do is the easiest;
feeling differently about something or someone takes a conscious
effort.
People like to blame how they choose to feel on anything else
that they can - the classic "taking offense" syndrome is the most
obvious example. "You cant say, do, think, or be like that - it
offends me" What "does" what!?! Just who's doing the "doing" here?
When there's no one else or no thing else to blame, the next thing
you hear is "I cant help myself!" Trouble is, your_self is really
the only one who actually *can* help, when it comes to choosing how
you feel. Others can set a good example from their choices for you
to see and follow, or they can lend a sympathetic ear until they
find what the problem *really* is, but that's really the most that
you, the one who is choosing to feel badly, can expect. To expect
someone else to change the things that they're doing for themselves
"so you can feel better" is a bit too much to ask, I believe.
There *are* some things, as a minimum, that a person wholly
owns and does have full_responsibility for - all by themselves.
Joe Jas
|
646.7 | set <flames> simmer | IAMOK::KOSKI | suggestions welcome | Fri Dec 30 1988 15:47 | 39 |
| > < Note 646.4 by REGENT::BROOMHEAD "Don't panic -- yet." >
> -< :-) It might work. :-) >-
>Tell her you're greedy, and you want more, more, more! Another
> mother to have and hoard and gloat over. More silly family
> stories to tell your grandchildren. More past, more color, more
> everything.
Hold on a minute! Before you get carried away with thinking of how
wonderful it's going to be to find your biological parents and get
involved with their wonderful life, take off your rose colored glasses
for just one minute.
I'm sorry to jump all over this but I *really* don't beleive in
this scenario. Please consider what it is that you might find if
your search is succesful. You might find a mother with another life
another family and the painful scar of having had to give up her
baby when she was young. Her current family may not even be privied
to this information. How will you feel if you traced your mother
to a drug infested housing project? Even if the the worse case scenario
doesn't happen what would you do if she doesn't want to meet you,
maybe she has tried long and hard to forget that painful time in
her life when she had to give you up for adoption.
Please think about what you might find and why you really have
a need to find these "other" parents. Yes, it is hurting your mother
to think you want to find your biological mother, she's likely
been dreading the day you might start this issue.
There are plenty of happy endings to adoptee searches, there are
many more that simply never end, and there are those that have painfull
endings. You, of course, have to decide what you want to do. I just
hope you consider *all* the parties involved. Especially yourself.
All this from an adoptee who is not all that wanted by her adoptive
parents so the last thing I'd want to find would be another set that didn't
want me.
Gail
|
646.8 | Because They Care About You | CURIE::MARCOMTAG | Lynne Say Don't Worry, Be Happy | Fri Dec 30 1988 16:10 | 26 |
| I can try to help you understand why your mother is saying things
like "how can you do this to me" You see, your mom raised you from
a baby, and considers you one of your own. She feeds you, she provides
for you, she supports you, she stood by you in all your milestones,
she and your father consider you their own flesh and blood. I
understand for medical reasons and plain ol' curiousity, that you
want to meat your biological parents, and it is instinctive and
normal. But you see, your adoptive parents are afraid they are
going to loose the daughter that they loved and lived for for ?
years, to your biological parents that you don't know. You have
to put yourself in their shoes...do you know what I mean. I know
it is very painful..and that is one of the pitfalls of being adopted.
Many adopted children instinctively want to go with their biological
parents when they find out that they are not so bad after all.
Your Adoptive parents are very fearful of that...many adoptive parents
are when they know that their child wants to find there real
parents..it is only normal. I say do search...but convince your
parents you wont leave them...and stick to your word no matter how
much you feel for your real parents (there is nothing wrong with
keeping in touch)...because if you don't, the parents that loved
you all their life will be devistated...I know I would if I adopted
a child, and then they decided to leave me after I took care and
provided for them all there life...I would be totally devistated.....
can you see my point...anyway good luck and god bless,
Lynne
|
646.9 | | RANCHO::HOLT | Robert Holt UCS4,415-691-4750 | Fri Dec 30 1988 19:15 | 10 |
| re .0
I am an adopted child found by my biomom 10 years ago.
It was extemely complicating, especially since there were
other siblings. Also it poisoned my relationship with my
steparents.
You may not like the people the newly found family turn out
to be.
|
646.10 | do I not understand PEOPLE or do I not understand me? | SSDEVO::GALLUP | UA -- u'r hot, 'Cats! | Sat Dec 31 1988 00:49 | 40 |
|
>> You may not like the people the newly found family turn out
>> to be.
but at least you would KNOW ...
RE: .0 and ramblings....
I must be completely out of touch or not understanding or
something, but the trust and the love you have is someone
should overcome ALL of these problems... Its just seems that
so many people today are hung up on "do you REALLY love me"
or "do you REALLY consider me your mother/father"...can't
people take the love and the caring for granted and BELIEVE
in the person...are people sooooo selfish/insecure these days
that they can't allow their adoptive child to seek their real
parents..for whatever reason? don't people realize there is
more than enough room in your heart for you to be able to
love/care for more people than just them?
If/when you found your parents...yes it might happen that
there is some kind of "bond"...just because you could find
you care for your biological parents, doesn't mean you won't
care just as much (if not more) for your adoptive parents...
Love is meant to share...not be selfish about...
<insert heavy sigh>...but then we ALL (yes...everyone of
us...) has our own insecurities... (and my list is FULL of
them...)
I hope you're able to explain to your mother...(adoptive)
that she is just as special and as important to your life as
finding your real family is....
i can't say I understand what you're going through, I'm not
adopted, although lots of times I feel like I am.....
|
646.11 | the BEST of luck! | DPDMAI::DAWSON | THAT MAKES SENSE.....NONSENSE! | Sun Jan 01 1989 12:03 | 15 |
| RE:.0
IMHO.....I would say, involve you "adoptive" mother and
father in all of this. Tell them of your fears and needs and reassure
them of your Love and affection. Try and convince them that you
are going to need their Love and support since this journey of yours
might turn out very badly. I also say this for your well being
because YOU might be the one that is very sorry and not secure in
what you find. Your parents could be the very "support" group that
could help beyond measure. Also try to understand their problems
with this decision of yours. Is it possible they know more about
your paternal mother than they let on and are only trying to protect
you?
Dave
|
646.12 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Mon Jan 02 1989 15:17 | 13 |
| I am for destroying all the records about adoptions. There is
no reason/benefit for the kid to know.... On the other hand, if the kid
does find out, it is only human for the kid to go out to find his/her
bio-mother/father. My advise to the basenote author is:
Go and find her out, but don't let your mom know (It is really
the other side of not letting the kid know of the adoption).
Well, I am not adopted (Maybe my mother just did a great job conceling
the adoption :-) :-), so it is only appropriate to warn you to take
my advise with a grain of salt.
Eugene
|
646.13 | from a mom by adoption | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Mon Jan 02 1989 20:47 | 36 |
| in re .12
There is no justification what so ever in destroying all records
of adoption. If people wnat, or need to find out about their
biological family they should have that right. Destroying such
records is destroying their past. I strongly recommend you read
the previously referenced note on adoption to get some idea
of how some adoptees feel about having no access to their
past.
and in general about this topic.
My husband and I have one 'home grown' and 4 adopted kids. They
are all 'our own' kids. So far none of the younger four have
wished to search (the oldest is 16). However, I have encouraged
them to think about searching if that is what they wish to do.
We will always know that we are their 'real' parents, whatever
'real' is. But if they want to know more about their birth family,
or know their half siblings, we will be supportive. We definitely
would have them go through the agency that placed them with us.
That agency has protocols set up for managing reunions and will
mediate any meetings. I would encourage an adopted child who
wants to search to first contact the agency that placed you with
your family. Second, if that does not produce the desired results,
contact one of the adoptive search organizations that now exist
in the US. (Names of several of them are mentioned in the note
in womannotes.) I would discourage 'do it yourself' reunions
unless there is no other possible choice...and even then I would
encourage the searcher to do so with the support of a person who
has been through the experience before (either as a social worker
or one of the parties to the adoption.) The popular advice columnists
like Ann Landers and Dear Abby have published letters from both
birth moms and adoptees who found the reunion experience to be
unhappy. So be careful.
Bonnie
|
646.14 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Tue Jan 03 1989 12:59 | 36 |
| re .13
I guess my point is not letting the kid know that he/she is adopted.
Most parents do not treat the adopted kids differently. However,
you have to look at it from the kid's point of view. Some kids
will start cleaning their rooms (without the parents' threat of
grounding them, that is) when they learn that they are adopted.
Of course, I do not mean destroying the adoption record. On the
contrary, the record should be kept in case the kid learns the adoption
somehow. In that case, it is up to the kids to decide whether to
search or not to search. "Destroying the adoption record" is just a
figurative way of emphasizing that adoption should be kept secret
from the parents perspective.
Now from the kid's perspective. If you find out you are adopted,
it is only human to want to find out your bio-parents. If your
parents object, do it but don't let them know about it. It is just
a matter of being thoughtful. Unfortunately, in most instances,
you will need your parents' help to find them. Well, I am all for
telling the parents that you love them and they are your only parents
and etc. But the fact that you have to assure your parents
on this point creates a sense of distance (maybe, maybe not). Well,
I know I am not making much sense here logically. But the
whole issue is a paradox. I mean if the parents tell the kid that
he/she is adopted, but they love him/her just the same, something
will be different. The same thing is true when the kid tells his/her
parents that they are his/her true and only parents, but he/she
is going to look for his/her bio-parents, something will be different
too. Well, maybe most people are not that sensitive. On the other
hand, many are. Every instance is different. However, in the case
of .0, it is obvious that her mom is very sensitive on this....
Finally, I do not see any point in have one's parents to meet with
one's bio-parents.
Eugene
|
646.15 | Adoption should NOT be hidden | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Jan 03 1989 14:38 | 35 |
| Eugene,
I'm sorry but you are very wrong. It is just about the worst
possible thing that a parent can do to lie to a child. Children
will find out that they are adopted eventually. When they do
they will suffer a terrible lack of trust in their parents.
Before we adopted our kids I was talking with a friend who had
adopted two children. She told me that the agency told her to
take her daughter home (she was 3 days old) and tell her that
she is adopted. She used adopted as an ajective when cuddling
her first and second kids and made it part of their normal
discussions when they were little. As a result the fact of
their adoption is 'no big deal' and the kids felt completely
accepted by their parents.
We followed the same advice with our children. Not only did we
discuss adoption openly with the kids, but each time we added
another kid, or went to court to finalize an adoption, the whole
family went along. My kids are quite well adjusted, and are bored
by the whole subject as teenagers! :-)
I am curious as to why you think that it would be advisable to
hide from a child the fact that they are adopted. This was more
common in the past when illigitimacy was considered a major
disgrace. I am aware that some people also feel strongly about
having a child of their ' own blood ' and hide an adoption for
that reason.
Bonnie
p.s. it would be pretty hard for us to hide that our kids are adopted
anyway....they are of a different race than my husband and I.
|
646.16 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Tue Jan 03 1989 18:57 | 24 |
| Bonnie,
I read a few notes in the refered notesfile. I think I am way out of
my line in jumping into this discussion. My point of hiding the fact of
adoption is that many difficult issues can be avoided if the kid simply does
not know he/she is adopted. I do not think illigitimacy or 'own blood' is
the issue in this day of age. The point is subtler. In many family
arguments, people, in anger, do (parents and kids) say things they do not
mean.... In the case of adoptive childreb, this just adds more complications....
Maybe I am not making much sense here, but....
On the other hand, as you said, in many instances, this is
just not possible. As a matter of fact, it is practically impossible since
even if the parents do not tell the kid, The kid will find it out through other
means, and there are just so many places to find out the fact. Friends
relatives, and etc.
In any case, I believe in results, and your family is an overwhelming
proof of your way.
Well, I hope my previous comments will be forgiven as "Youthful
indiscretion".
Eugene
|
646.17 | | ANT::BUSHEE | Living on Blues Power | Wed Jan 04 1989 13:15 | 21 |
|
RE: .16
Eugene, One thing that really struck me about your replies
have been basing the whole family unit on lies! I can't see
how this would be healthy to any involved.
You state: Adoptive parents should hide (lie) about it.
then you state: if the kids do find out and search out
bio-parents they should hide it from the adoptive parents.
I'm sorry, I couldn't (nor wouldn't) want to grow up in that
sort of a family, just WHEN could you believe what another
was saying?? I've always looked at family as the one place
in my life where I know I could count on my parents to be
open and honest.
Just my opinion on the subject,
G_B
|
646.18 | Why cover up, are you afraid? | MCIS2::AKINS | We'll have to remove it then | Wed Jan 04 1989 14:59 | 9 |
| All I have to say to the parent's of adoptive kids is to get some
self-confidence. So what if your son/daughter wants to findout
his bloodline, he is not going to forget you or love you any less.
After all you provided love and caring to them, you brought them
up and you molded their lives. To give you up is to give up their
own being. Try and be sensitive to their feelings, after all, many
people trace their roots even if they are not adopted.
Bill
|
646.19 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Thu Jan 05 1989 00:49 | 88 |
| re .17
I wouldn't call them lies. I would call them being considerate
and thoughtful to other's feelings. Life is not that simple....
Consider the following hypothetical situation:
Suppose a friend is dying because of a car accident. You friend
spent all his life writing a novel, and he has just finished his
book two days ago. Unfortunately, the book was burned during
in the accident. In his last moment, he asks you to promise
him that you will get his book published. Will you tell him that
the book has been burned? I would not. Rather, I would promise
him. Strictly speaking this is not telling the truth, but I think
it is the right thing to do.
I also remember reading a story in
the refered notesfile about a mother putting her new born baby for
adoption because she could not take care of the baby for various reasons.
When she went home, she told the other kids that the baby died during
birth. Would you call that a lie? I would not.
I guess you see my point....
When I wrote my
previous notes, I feel that it is to the child's benefit that the
child does not know that he/she is adopted. Let me give you a
hypothetical senario. Suppose a couple goes to Alaska. Stays there for
a year or two, adopts a child and comes back to MA. No one
will suspect that the child was adopted. In such circumstance,
I personally feel that there is no reason to let the kid know of
the adoption. After reading the refered note string,
I understand some adoptees' feeling about having no access to their
past. The ultimate way of eliminating this difficulty is not
letting the child know that he/she is adopted. If I remember
correctly, I have never in my life asked my mother whether I was
adopted or not. I guess this is true with most people (maybe, maybe not).
As you can see, the "lie" will probably never be an issue.
So in the above senario, what will be the point of telling the kid
that he/she was adopted and make him/her feel bad about having no
access to their past (remember it is very difficult for a 5 year
old to go to Alaska on his/her own)?
Now what if the child finds out later in his/her life. In this
case, the parents should tell the above reasons to the child as
to why he/she was not told. Make the child understand that the
parents did what they did out of love rather than
fear (as .18 suggested). The parents should then offer all the
information related to the adoption, and offer help to find the
child's bio-parents if the child so wishes. One thing the parents
should not do is be secretive about it when the child found out
about the adoption. This will make the child feel real bad.
There are a few advantages of doing things this way. First, before
the child learns about the adoption, he/she will not have the
knowledge of the adoption. This may sound like a tautology, but
by not letting the kid know about the adoption, the
parents allow the kid to be "homegrown" (Bonnie's word), and avoid
many of the difficulties. Second, even if the kid finds
out later, it will be better than to have him/her find out earlier.
What I mean is that the older the kid is the easier it will be for
him/her to deal with the feelings about the adoption (I maybe wrong
on this, but...).
Well, as I said in the previous notes, every adoption is different,
and I am not trying to generalize here. Moreover, parents have
their feelings too. In some cases, the parents are just not
comfortable about not telling the kid about the adoption, and in
other cases, it is just plain impossible (like in Bonnie's case).
Well, I am a single "homegrown" male perhaps a yuppie :-) :-).
I guess I get interested in the topic
because I spent my childhood at my uncle's home. My uncle's family
treated me well and made it quite clear from the beginning that their
home was my home, but it was not the same.... Maybe that is why
I emphasize the feelings of the adoptees about the present rather
than about the past.... Maybe I am out of my line here again....
re .18,
Please understand that my motivation for advocating the so called
"cover up" is purely for the benefit of the adoptees (as explained
above). Maybe I am wrong.
Oh well, I know this is a very sensitive issue to many people.
If I had offended anyone, I sincerely apologize.
Eugene
|
646.20 | | MCIS2::AKINS | We'll have to remove it then | Thu Jan 05 1989 06:25 | 18 |
| Sorry I don't buy lies no matter what the reason.
In the case of the book, I would avoid the question and if that
was impossible to do so I would tell him the truth. I know that
he would never know if i did lie, but I would and if I couldn't
keep a promise that I made to a dieing friend it would eat me up.
The same for adoption. Sure it's ok to avoid the question, but
if I could not do so any longer, the truth will come out. As
Einstein said "The Truth never changes, only ones knowledge of the
Truth changes."
As for not telling him out of love......if you want to tell your
kid it's ok to lie as long as you have a good reason then go for
it. I don't agree....
Re:-.1
|
646.21 | The Author replies | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Thu Jan 05 1989 09:30 | 29 |
| In my case I am the author of this note: and my case history is
as follows, I ws never told about my adoption, I found out when
at the age of 12 and my baby book read "for an adopted child". I
was furious that my parents had tried to cover it up. I can now
forgive them. The reasons are many that I would like to search and
all have been mentioned in the replies in this note.
Eugene, I have p[ut my first born up for adoption, a healthy baby
boy, I put him up from birth. Believe me it broke my heart, but
I ws single, the father walked out on me when I was 6 months pregnant.
I had no place to live if I had kept the baby except for welfare
could provide for me. I figured that at the age of 20 and very immature
it was best for my son to be raised by two healthy adults that could
provide all the needs and wants that kids/adults have in life.
I told the agency that his reords are to be opened. I have letters
for each of his birthday waiting for him incase he does get to the
agency.
Most people tell you that think of your child as being dead!!!!
I can't and neither can anybody else that is on one end of the process
or the other, that child is still living, growing, and thinking
and you can't forget no matter what.
Back to my case, I can't and have never forgotten that I have
another mother in my life that gave me the best gift of all, she
gave me life, not an abortion, not a life where we would be struggling
but a chance at life she could have never given me, and that is
the biggest gift of love any mother can give her child. and all
I really would like to do when/if I met this other person is to
say my thanxs and tell her I love her.
Lisa
|
646.22 | otther possibilities | YODA::BARANSKI | Oh No! Don't slay that potatoe! | Thu Jan 05 1989 10:14 | 18 |
| I believe that a lot of times when people lie or conceal the truth in order to
not hurt someone's feelings, that really their motivation is that they don't
want to have to deal with what they suppose will be to other person's feelings.
I'd rather have the Truth... straight up, on the rocks.
"I have another mother in my life that gave me the best gift of all, she gave me
life, not an abortion, not a life where we would be struggling but a chance at
life she could have never given me, and that is the biggest gift of love any
mother can give her child."
I hate to bring up another possibility, but do you *know* this? Isn't it
possible that your mother gave you up for selfish reasons? Or that her family
forced her to give you up. What if you find that giving you up destroyed her,
and you find an alcholic or drugee wreck? It seems to me that you may be
assuming that your mother is like you, which may not be the case.
Jim.
|
646.23 | Already expecting the worst | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Thu Jan 05 1989 10:30 | 12 |
| JIM,
I have already assumed that I was illegimiate, What else could've
happened. the agency has told me that my mom met my dad at college
and there I was nine months later. So that tells me that I wasn't
exactly planned in my mother's life. My biggest question was if
she was at college in R.I. surely some of the girls there knew of
a back street abornist. I kinda got the feeling that the family
had forced her to give me up. And if/when I meet this woman or have
contact withher I am expecting the worst. She doesn't want to meet
with me for whatever the reasons. That way I can't be hurt, too
much.
|
646.24 | as hard as it might be, the truth is the answer | IAMOK::KOSKI | suggestions welcome | Thu Jan 05 1989 12:52 | 16 |
| To address Eugene's theory that one lie will save someone from hurt.
I think you are really missing the BIG picture. Not telling a child
about there adoption is like living a big lie. You think adoption
doesn't come up? Maybe not in so many words, but what about normal
growing up questions, starting with where did I come from <insert
lie here>. Why don't I look like you Mom? <insert lie>. Help me
fill out my medical history on this form <insert dangerous lies>.
Do you see the point I'm trying to make.
Reread the responses that begin lies never make things better. Living
in lies and deception is not going to help anyone.
I really feel for the noter that didn't find out until 12, that
is a very hard trust to regain.
Gail
|
646.25 | Love forgives all. | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Thu Jan 05 1989 14:59 | 8 |
| As for medical I just don't/can't answer anything except I do know
my grandmother had dibities aand if medical experts say is true
and it skips a generation, then maybe I am the one to get it.,
or maybe one of my half siblings if I have any.
And it's really not a metter of trust vs hurt feelings,but in love
all is forgiven.
Lisa
|
646.26 | not worth discussing. DEFINITELY tell the child. | HANNAH::OSMAN | type hannah::hogan$:[osman]eric.vt240 | Thu Jan 05 1989 16:28 | 12 |
| Some things are not even worth discussing.
It's extremely important to reveal a child's adoption from the
time of the adoption, rather than lie or hide it.
Anything else is just plain sick, and can be disasterous.
Furthermore, anyone applying to adopt a child should have to promise
that they will be honest with their child FROM DAY 1 about the fact that the
child is adopted.
/Eric
|
646.27 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Fri Jan 06 1989 01:28 | 87 |
| re .20
> Sorry I don't buy lies no matter what the reason.
Again I will not call them lies.... I would rather call it
protecting one's children/friends who are vulnerable to the harsh reality.
I am also curious to know what you think of the millions of parents who
told their children that Santa Claus exists.
> In the case of the book, I would avoid the question and if that
> was impossible to do so I would tell him the truth. I know that
> he would never know if I did lie, but I would and if I couldn't
> keep a promise that I made to a dieing friend it would eat me up.
I understand your reasons, and I fully respect that. What I am going
to say below is purely my opinions. First of all, I would not even
try to avoid the question. In my opinion, the worst thing to do is
to put a friend in anxiety for even a single second of the last few
precious moments of his life. Second, I would rather make a promise
that I cannot keep so that my friend can die in peace. As you said,
this will "eat me up". But I would rather have it eat ME up than have
the harsh fact eats my friend up in his last few moments of life.
Furthermore, suppose the friend died an agonizing death. After he
passed away, his wife came over and asked me whether my friend
died in peace. What harm, what damage, what wrong will be done if
I answered yes even if it is not exactly true? Is there no place
for a little compassion to shield our children our friends from the
truth of the slings and arrows and a thousand other natural shocks?
> The same for adoption. Sure it's ok to avoid the question, but
> if I could not do so any longer, the truth will come out. As
> Einstein said "The Truth never changes, only ones knowledge of the
> Truth changes."
Again I would not advise anyone to avoid the question. This will
needlessly raise doubts amount the children. Avoiding the question
usually sends an implicit message to the children that it is not
appropriate to talk about the subject. Meanwhile the question hangs
there in the children's mind.... Finally, there is difference between
avoiding the question and not making the children aware of the
the question (as in some cases of adoption).
> As for not telling him out of love......if you want to tell your
> kid it's ok to lie as long as you have a good reason then go for
> it. I don't agree....
I am all for defending the truth and honesty. If you take a look
in the PHYSICS, BIOLOGY, MATH, ASTRONOMY notesfiles, you will see me
defending the truth at all cost :-). As a matter of fact, I am so
concerned about the truth that someone once called me "a sticker for
scientific correctness" (see LDP::BIOLOGY note 88.8). However, we
are talking about human relations here. We are dealing with paradoxes,
contradictions, and dilemmas that are inherent in our complex lives.
I would like to know what you think of the parents who told their 3
year old that if he/she puts his/her hand on the hot stove, Santa
won't give him/her present next year. I would say that the parents
are protecting their child. In this area, all I can say is: "Do the
right thing".
re .21,
I am somewhat puzzled by your response. You made it sound like
I was passing my opinions on the mothers who put up their children
for adoption. But the fact is I have never done such thing. All
I did in .19 was reiterating a story about a mother who put up her
child for adoption. And that was all.
re .26
I don't know what to say to you other than that I do not like
the way this discussion is going....
So far I have been called a liar (almost) to children, accused of
being insensitive to the adoptees, and being sick.... I feel that
this is really uncalled for. I re-read all my previous essays on
this topic.... All I can say is that if you read my essays carefully
and objectively, you will find that all I did was advocating what I
believe will better the environment for the adoptees to grow up. For
the record, I did not mean to question other people's way. I didn't
even claim what I said will work. I was just presenting what seems
reasonable to me for the discussion.
This will probably be my last contribution to this topic. To all
those who read my essays, I thank you for your interest. To those
whom I unintentionally offended, I once again apologize. To the
parents of adopted children, good luck, and finally to the adoptees
of the world, my best wishes.
Eugene
|
646.28 | Don't leave just yet.... | MCIS2::AKINS | We'll have to remove it then | Fri Jan 06 1989 03:53 | 97 |
|
> Again I will not call them lies.... I would rather call it
> protecting one's children/friends who are vulnerable to the harsh reality.
> I am also curious to know what you think of the millions of parents who
> told their children that Santa Claus exists.
Any way you look at it when you don't tell the truth, It's a lie!!!
If you are into PHYSICS as you say, then you must realize that there are certain
facts of Physics that has to be accepted. Thems the facts baby. You just have
to accept it. If your adopted I believe that it would be easier to know of your
adoption all your life so that you can deal with it. I really doubt that anyone
can keep the kid from finding out of his adoption for 70+ years....
FLAME ON! SANTA CLAUS. GIVE IT A REST!!! SANTA CLAUS IS A FAIRY TALE. IT IS
NOT AS IMPORTANT AS A PERSON'S ORIGINS. I BELIEVED IN SANTA UNTIL I WAS ABOUT
9. IT DIDN'T CAUSE EMOTIONAL SHOCK TO FIND OUT THAT IT WAS DEAR OLD DAD. IT IS
A PRETTY UNBELIEVABLE STORY ANYWAY. COME ON. I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT YOU HAD THE
NERVE TO USE A CHILDS FANTASY TO COMPARE WITH THIS.....
FLAME OFF!
> In my opinion, the worst thing to do is
> to put a friend in anxiety for even a single second of the last few
> precious moments of his life. Second, I would rather make a promise
> that I cannot keep so that my friend can die in peace. As you said,
> this will "eat me up". But I would rather have it eat ME up than have
> the harsh fact eats my friend up in his last few moments of life.
I would have compasion, yeah, but I would say "I'll try, or I'll give it
my best shot." then I would follow through. I would go over any remains
of the book, or any notes that he may have had. But I would never make a
promise I would not be able to keep. I would try and sooth his mind the
best I could, but to me, my word is everything. I would hope he would
realize that I couldn't make a false promise, I hate to sound cold or
selfish but the reality of it is that he isn't going to agonize over it
for much longer. I will for the rest of my life.
> Is there no place
> for a little compassion to shield our children our friends from the
> truth of the slings and arrows and a thousand other natural shocks?
Compasion yes, Lies No!
> Again I would not advise anyone to avoid the question. This will
> needlessly raise doubts amount the children. Avoiding the question
> usually sends an implicit message to the children that it is not
> appropriate to talk about the subject. Meanwhile the question hangs
> there in the children's mind.... Finally, there is difference between
> avoiding the question and not making the children aware of the
> the question (as in some cases of adoption).
Avoid the question, diplomaticaly. If you think that It will harm the child to
avoid it further then don't do it. I wouldn't. It would then be time to tell
the child what he/she wants to know. It's kind of like the Birds and the Bees.
You avoid it until he or she is old enough to handle it.
> However, we
> are talking about human relations here. We are dealing with paradoxes,
> contradictions, and dilemmas that are inherent in our complex lives.
> I would like to know what you think of the parents who told their 3
> year old that if he/she puts his/her hand on the hot stove, Santa
> won't give him/her present next year. I would say that the parents
> are protecting their child. In this area, all I can say is: "Do the
> right thing".
First of all, I wouldn't tell my kid that if he or she touches a stove
Santa won't give them a present. What I would say is that it will cause them
to get burned. I'm sure no kid wants to recieve pain. As for paradoxes,
contradictions and dilemmas, lies of any sort make more than they solve.
Human relations is no exception....(actuall it is even more apparent)
re .26
I don't know what to say to you other than that I do not like
the way this discussion is going....
> So far I have been called a liar (almost) to children, accused of
> being insensitive to the adoptees, and being sick....
> ... To those
> whom I unintentionally offended, I once again apologize. To the
> parents of adopted children, good luck, and finally to the adoptees
> of the world, my best wishes.
I didn't mean to call you a liar, although it may have sounded like it.
As with you, I'm only stating my opinion. It just so happens that it
doesn't agree with yours. The Flames are just when it hit a nerve and
emotions run a little high. It is in no way meant to call you a Santa
hater. I also offer my apologies to those that I may have offended and
wish the same good luck to the parents (natural and adoptive) and the
children.
Bill
|
646.29 | Totall offbase | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:12 | 15 |
| EUGENE,
I think you, only opinion, are totally off base
in this subject. You have admitted as not being adopted so how can
you make all these assumptions and ideas? Can you look at your mother
or father or any sibling and see any resemblance? Good for you!
I can't, Can you ask someone anyone in your family for medical
background, ie: about cancer products taken earlier in their life,
that might have been passed down to you? Good for you, I can't.
Maybe if my mother is/was a druggie/drunk maybe I could help her
in someway. But Santa Claus is not a harmful fantasy, children crtainly
learn the truth before they are 5 1/2 or 6.
In adoption we are talking about a matter that concerns where
life all started from.
IN life adoption is not harsh reality but a fact of life.
and if the adoptive parents handle it properly it is no big deal.
|
646.30 | another way to look at it... | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Fri Jan 06 1989 09:55 | 10 |
| Folks,
There is one thing that Eugene said that I think people are missing.
He said he was brought up by an uncle and never really quite felt
he belonged (or words to that effect). Perhaps he feels that telling
a child they were adopted would give them that same feeling of not
quite belonging that he had. I think he is trying to keep a kid
from feeling the same way.
Bonnie
|
646.31 | Loved no matter what | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Fri Jan 06 1989 10:20 | 8 |
| Eugene,
I'm sorry you were made to be felt that you never belonged. I
was brought up the oppesite, I was one of the family, no if's ands'
or but's. I grew up feeling loved/wanted and needed and like I had
a place in this family. I was never made to feel unwelcomed unless
I put those feelings on myself. I was told I was always the girl
they had dreamed about and they were never sorry about their choice.
Lisa
|
646.32 | Children need honest and respect | GEMVAX::BUEHLER | | Fri Jan 06 1989 12:26 | 54 |
|
I didn't want to enter a reply to this topic but couldn't resist.
I've learned through trial and error that the best way to treat children is
with respect and dignity, to give them credit for being human beings.
To do this, one must use clear, straightforward answers to their
questions. Children *know* when they are being deceived; and once
trust has been destroyed, it's very hard to rebuild. I read somewhere
not long ago, that it's been determined that if a child's trust
has been violated by the time he/she is 4, then it will take a lifetime
to rebuild this trust.
One of the things that can drive a person crazy are mixed and double
messages. Another destructive situation is when parents invalidate
their child's feelings; for instance, the child is terrified of
the dentist but the parent insists that "there's nothing to be afraid
of"; what is the child to think? He/She begins to think she's crazy,
and cannot know what he/she is feeling. The child begins to lose
trust in him/herself--cannot identify his/her own feelings.
At any rate, what I want to say is, if a 3 year old is wanting to
touch a hot stove, the parent explains, "the stove is hot, it will
burn you, it will hurt". Period. Clear, precise, straightforward.
Why bring in threats of "no presents from Santa?" This threat
isn't even relevant to the hot stove and only serves to add more
stress and worry to the child--now this child has to worry about
not getting gifts.
Parenting is the hardest job there is; I'm struggling still with
my own childhood and also that of my daughter's. Honesty is
the one of the most important things a parent can be with a child;
when one is honest, he/she is saying that he/she respects the child
and is honoring this child with trust. Children deserve to hear
the truth; it is insulting and destructive to lie to childen,
"even for their own good." One of my earliest memories if of
my mother "lying" to me about going to the dentist (I was 4); she
said we were going to town, to buy a toy; instead, she opened a
door and there was the chair. I remember to this day, that before
I was konked out, I thought, "Mum's DOING this to me--oh no".
Years later, when my mother would suggest a trip to town, I would
go into sheer panic, every building we walked into, I waited for
the worst (dentist); and would only feel safe again, until I was
back home. Lying only served the purpose of relieving my MOTHER
of anxiety (she didn't want to deal with my fears of the dentist);
it was easy for her--I'm still working through it.
Sorry I've rambled; thanks for listening;
Maria
|
646.33 | Trust is best friend | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Fri Jan 06 1989 15:01 | 13 |
| RE .32
Thanxs you've put alot of thought into yor reply and I feel I can
relate to you. You mentioned trust many times and without it a
relationship of any sort is not one that healthy. How true that
is, in either adults to adults or adults to children. I know my
boyfriend is a weekdend parent to three children and often I am
there also to enjoy/panic at these times. I have learned that Honesty
at all costs is best. The children often remember things as we as
adults have dismissed them as being stuipd or silly. So often I
wanted to coddle them from the reality but remembered that in the
long run expierence and gentle truth is the best teacher.
Lise'
|
646.35 | Everyone has a right to their opinion... | MCIS2::AKINS | We'll have to remove it then | Sat Jan 07 1989 00:22 | 17 |
| re:-.1
I should apologize also, I jumped all over your replys when I was
a bit bent out of shape. You see, I have been recently hurt very
badly by lies, I have always hated them in the first place. What
you were suggesting struck me, and my emotions got a little steamed.
I flamed too quickly. I knew there were somethings that were deemed
untrue and yet weren't lies. Santa Claus was one of them. I felt
that it was understood that fiction was not considered a lie, you
pointing it out that following my logic "anything untrue is a lie"
included old Saint Nick, made me a bit tiffed. Sorry if I blew
off the handle. I'm not even adopted so I probably have no right
to be in here at all. I'm just dead set against lieing. Again,
sorry for being so touchy.
Bill
|
646.36 | On Bill's invitation, one last time. | HPSTEK::XIA | | Sat Jan 07 1989 00:32 | 92 |
| Well, I admit that I am not doing a good job explaining my views.
Ever since I read the other referred notesfile, I realized that this is a
very sensitive issue to many people. Hence, I tried my best to express
my point without offending anyone (I feel that I definitely did a bad job on
this). If anyone was reading this note around the time of my earlier 2
submissions, he/she would have notice that I submitted and resubmitted the
essays many times. The reason was that I wanted to be very very careful about
what I said. The irony was that by the time I finished my rewriting, it is
over midnight, and my brain does not work very well by then :-) ....
The result was a lot of cloudy talks and cloudy implications on my part.
These cloudy things left behind a load of misunderstandings that I felt
compelled to correct. Then again due to the same reasons above, I gave more
cloudy talks which induced more complications.... Right now I feel like I
was "full of high sentences but a bit obtuse..." I know I am being cloudy
here again. So at this point, I will take Bill's advice and be direct.
Let me just say before hand that if I again unintentionally offend anyone,
I ask for your apology.
Bill,
I want to make it very clear that I was not comparing the story
of Santa Claus to not telling kids their adoptions. The only reason I
brought up the Santa Claus story was because you insisted on, I quote,
"Any way you look at it when you don't tell the truth, It's a lie!!!"
Mathematically, I do not challenge the validity of such statement, but
it is definitely simplistic when applied to the issues concerning human
relations. According to such simplistic logic, you were lied to until you
were 9! I want to emphasize that the only reason I invoked Santa was to
show the absurdity of such simplistic application of mathematical logic in
this instance, consequently, showing that only by such absurd application
can one conclude that the parents who do not tell their children about their
adoptions are liars. I implied nothing else. I am sorry I said these
things, but I promised to be direct. I jumped into this discussion thinking
I could contribute, but instead I ended up writing a lot of stuff to clear
misunderstandings. The last thing I want now is leaving any hostile feelings
behind. Maybe we can work this thing out over private mail (that is if you
want to).
Lisa,
I am glad you have a wonderful family. You said in a previous note that
you did not know the adoption until 12 (If I am mistaking, please correct me).
Let me ask this. Do you feel that you would have a sense of belonging to the
family had you been told at an earlier age? I know this question is somewhat
unfair since it is purely hypothetical, but could there be a conceivable
possibility that had you been informed of the adoption at a very earlier age,
you could have felt totally different? Before you answer this question,
think about this: Children are emotionally vulnerable. The younger they are,
the more vulnerable they are. Also, family, by its very nature, is a complex
institution. Arguments rise between children and parents, between siblings.
Usually, the adults are more careful about what they say, but sometimes
children can say the most, how should I put it, blatant things to each other.
The adoption issue just adds in more complications. Sometimes, even the most
innocent act (in other words, the things most children do not even pay
attention to) out of the most benign intent can be interpreted differently
from an adopted child's perspective. Moreover, it is not just the family.
There are the neighbors, relatives.... For many kids, it takes only one
incident.... More important, it is at an early age that children develop a
sense of belonging to the family. Let me stress another point. Once a child
developed a sense of NOT belonging, it is very difficult if not impossible to
change that perspective. As you said, you learn about your adoption at 12.
By that age, most people have already developed a sense of belonging (or not
belonging).... Of course, I do not deny that there are negatives of not
telling the child about adoption. I admitted in a previous note about the
difficulty of concealing the adoption, but at least your case demonstrated such
possibility (I apologize if I sound insensitive here). It is not at all clear
to me that the negative of such concealment outweights the positive. Let me
also say that there are other aspects that I have not mentioned. For that
I refer you to the other notesfile where people talk about the difficulties
of dealing with adoption. Let me point out that all this is because of their
knowledges of their adoptions (incidentally, most of the difficulties rise
in an early age). Once again, I will admit that I am "homegrown".
However, I do observe, and I did not come to my conclusions by a fiat. Finally,
I am only expressing another perspective of the problem, that is the average
day to day living environment rather than tracing one's roots, and I am in
no way trying to ignore the significance of the latter issue.
Maria,
Yes, I agree with you that some of those experiences can be traumatic.
All I can say is that people tend to remember the traumatic events. Especially,
when it was done in such a way. However, there are other things
(eg. Santa Claus) that we later found out to be not exactly true. After we
grow up, we usually wave our hands with a laugh, and often forget (or think
them to be expected) about the tremendous psychological benefit we received
from those fairy tales when we were children. Warning! I am NOT comparing
Maria's experience with the dentist to the story of Santa Claus!! What I
am pointing out is that if our parents had been very strictly straight forward
about everything when we were children, we wouldn't have had Santa Claus
(and others) with all the psychological benefits that go with it. All I
can say is that if such things (being not strictly straight forward, that is)
were handled properly, and done for ALTRUISTIC reasons, it is not necessarily
bad (like Santa Claus).
Eugene
|
646.37 | | HPSTEK::XIA | | Sat Jan 07 1989 03:03 | 15 |
| Well, .36 should be .34. I have been doing submitting and resubmitting
again, but this time Bill managed to get in between :-) :-).
Bill,
I am sorry to hear what happened to you.
In this long and somewhat heated discussion, I am also not without
fault. I agree with you that it is wrong to lie, but I also agree
with you that it is ok to let children believe in Santa Claus.
This summarizes figuratively my feelings on this complex issue of
adoption.
Peace
Eugene
|
646.38 | Love thicker than blood lines | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Mon Jan 09 1989 08:57 | 9 |
| Let me clear up a few issues that have come up. Today at the mature
age of 28, I feel very much part of the "family unit". I am loved
respected, and a valued member of my family. For as the saying goes
love is thicker than blood lines for family members get in disputes
and don't talk for years or won't even be in the same room until
a death of a love one dicates it necessary. I am glad I am loved
and part of a family. Most of all we all love each other no matter
how diffeerent we are as people, we are family and stick by each
other no matter what.
|
646.39 | A long story | COMET::INDERMUEHLE | | Mon Jan 09 1989 10:21 | 68 |
|
I can honestly remember this ...
From the time that I was about 4 until I was nearly 5, I used to pray
for a blonde-haired, blue-eyed baby sister. (The chance of getting one
naturally was slim, my mom is Japanese and my dad had dark brown hair.) I was
lonely and I figured that if I was going to pray for a sister, I may as well
be explicit about my order ...
One day, we took a trip from Kansas to Texas. At the time I thought Texas
was the next town over ... I remember spending a lot of time at my cousins'
house. As a matter of fact, I was there all day with mith my 6 cousins. I
wondered briefly where my parents and aunt were but forgot about it quickly
in my bliss of having A LOT of kids to play with all at once!!!
Well, late in the afternoon, my parents arrived. They told me to look in
the back seat of the car - guess what they had brought me????? Yep, a
blond-haired, blue-eyed little girl baby. INCREDIBLE!! God really did
hear my earnest prayers.
I never thought much about where she came from, I was a small child and
didn't care about where babies (really) came from.
Time went by. I got over the normal feelings of sibling intrusion and wanting
God to take her back, I didn't really mean it :^) and settled down into having
an honest-to-goodness blonde-haired blue-eyed little sister.
One day, I went running to the sounds of my sister screaming bloody murder.
I came upon about 4 other kids just beating the snot out of her (by now
we were living in Texas). They were screaming horrible things at her.
"Jap lover" is the one that sticks out in my mind. But my sister was
defiantly screaming back "I'm proud to be a Jap!" Well, neither of us
knew what a "Jap" was supposed to be, but I peeled the creeps off her and
helped her hobble home.
When we got there and we told our mom what had happened, she got a really
sad look on her face. (I supposed she was dreading this day.) She told
us all about it. She told us that my sister was born of my aunt, but
because my aunt already had six children and had gotten a divorce (she has
the same father as all of her biological sisters/brothers), she couldn't
afford to take care of any more children. Then our mom told us that she
almost died when she gave birth to me and couldn't have anymore kids. She
said that she and dad had overheard my many pleas to God, and that He had
offered them an opportunity to answer the prayer. Well, my sister was
impressed that I had wanted her so badly and said something to the effect
"That she was lucky that I had prayed for her because some kids just get
stuck with their brothers/sisters, if they wanted them or not!" The only
problem that she had with it is that she seemed a little perturbed that
she didn't have any Japanese blood in her. After that, when people had
the nerve to ask her if she was adopted, she would just tell them that
she took after our dad (I remember how we used to chuckle about that one!)
Years went by, and when my sister was 13, my aunt tried to get her to come
live with her. This hurt my parents to the core, but they didn't try
to dissuade her or anything. They gave her the opportunity to think about
it and make her own decision. It didn't take her long to make up her mind.
She told our aunt (her biological mother) that even though my parents didn't
bring her into this world, they were the ones that had insured that she
was still in it! That they were the ones who had taken care of her when she
was sick, praised her achievements and helped her through her discouragements.
As far as she was concerned, they were her "REAL" parents.
Anyway, my sister is still my sister and even though the old saying goes
"Blood is thicker than water" - I couldn't love her any more!! Love is
what counts.
Elaine
|
646.40 | everyone needs a past | WMOIS::E_FINKELSEN | Set def [.friday_pm] | Fri Jan 13 1989 12:35 | 31 |
| A friend of mine was telling me that when she was little some of the kids at
school started to tease her and they told her she was adopted. She went running
home and told her mom what the kids had said. Her mom gently said, "Well Honey,
actually, you are." (the kids hadn't really known she was, it was just a thing
kids used to say to each other and probably still do. I know my sisters used to)
She was only about 6 or something. They sat down and told her all about it.
How when they asked her brother what they should name his new little sister he
wanted to name her "hammer". (he was only 4 and it was his favorite word.)
They weren't holding the truth from her for any other reason than to make sure
she was old enough to understand. Her brother was also adopted, but doesn't
like for people to know, whereas she is proud of it and will mention it
offhandedly.
Their parents could have kept it from them because they all look alike. As a
matter of fact, she sometimes has a hard time convincing someone that she was
adopted.
She says that she would like to see her natural mother and any brothers and
sisters but only thru a 2 way mirror. She wouldn't want to meet them or start a
relationship with them.
Another friend of mine adopted his sister's baby boy. They told him right off
that he was adopted. Because of court mixups the adoption didn't finalize until
he was three. They had a party and he was walking up to everyone with a big
smile saying, "I was 'dopted today!"
Every kid loves to hear antidotes about when they were born (or while mom was
pregnant) and adopted kids are no different. I'm sure they all cherish stories
about how the family felt about getting a new little baby. Everyone needs a
past.
|
646.41 | just my opinion | NETMAN::DRUEKE | | Wed Jan 18 1989 00:54 | 43 |
|
OK, I've never replied to anything in this file before tonight - so
things change for a little while... I am adopted and have known about it for
as long as I can remember. AND I LIKE IT!! I am 45 years old and have
encountered at least one problem about it!
When I was young I can rememeber knowing I was adopted and crying myself to
sleep after a scoulding, thinking 'If I was adopted by some other couple
things wouldn't be this way..." Eventually, still at a young age, I started
thinking "what other couple, what other circumstances?" I hadn't an answer.
Even later, still at a relatively young age, I decided that this couple
chose(SP, who cares) to 'have' me. I've always been very (*EXTREMELY*)
happy for that.
This couple, (now, just my mom), worked extra hard to instill their values,
morals, etc, in me as I was growing up. To this day, and to the day I die,
I will love them for this. They formed my character and my ideals, and the
way I am and what I believe in. (over the years I've talked with several
other adopted adults and they seem to have shared my opinion).
I was married when I was 19 and sometime later I found us with three children,
ok, kids. Later, one or more of the kids found themselves in a situation my
wife thought was due to my heritage. Eventually, through the efforts of my
wife and her father (whom I deeply respect for many reasons, I was the only
one who spent a night with him while he died of cancer) left me one
fold of paper away from a pointer to more information about my 'real'
parents.
I never opened that fold of paper, and have since destroyed it -- I KNOW
who my parents are - they raised me! BY CHOICE!!
I know what happily married couples will say about that - I also know about the
accidents possible with birth control - and I am also an only child!
My father died years ago and I am older now. I speak with my mother almost
every week. I always tell her I love her (and I mean it) not only because
I missed several (hell, many) opportunities to also tell my dad.
I know that at least one, and I expect all, of my kids know I'm adopted.
They're all adults now - it hasnt really mattered.
I just wish they really knew how much I love them.
|
646.42 | A couple of random thoughts | HANDY::MALLETT | Split Decision | Mon Jan 23 1989 10:21 | 53 |
| re: .3 & .0
Leaving the "what's-best-for-adoptive-children-in-general" discussion,
it seems to me that that one major part of your dilemma is your
a-parents' (particularly Mom's) reaction:
� I've tried everything! I hugged her cried tears with her, told her
� I loved her, But she thinks "how can you do this to me and your
� dad? We love you"
Have you poked around at some of that dynamic? That is, have you all
tried to explore *why* she (apparently) feels that your searching
for your bio-folks would be a rejection of her love? That certainly
appears to be the equation she's setting up. I have a feeling
that as long as she hooks your acceptance of their love with your
searching for your bio-parents, there can be little resolution of
what's obviously a very painful situation.
Does she generally profess an "unconditional" love and, if so, has
she taken a look at the transaction as a variation on the "If you
*really* loved me you'd do (or wouldn't do) such-and-such" theme?
It also has a ring to me of the "How have I/we failed as parents?"
dynamic which again rests on the assumption that specific activities
are either proofs or refutations of the care and love they've given you.
I don't know if it's possible (particularly without a bit of outside
guidance) to separate the event the search from your (I assume)
unconditional love for your bio-parents, but it sounds essential
if the pain is to be lessened.
One caveat: as others have mentioned, it's real important to
be very aware of your own assumptions and expectations in this
search - the may set you up for some big disappointments. At
one point you mentioned:
� . . .I want to tell this woman thank-you for her decision that
� was made of love. . .
I certainly hope that the truth works out to be as you envision
it, but perhaps it might help your own process to consider the
possibility that your birth was, like some, not entirely an act
of love. With all the gentleness I can muster, might I suggest
you consider that your birth was (for your bio-mom) some kind of
mistake, an event that she, for whatever reason, didn't wish to
happen but didn't manage to prevent? Your own motives sound pretty
clean and clear to me, but might it help your process to do a
wee bit of counselling? Sometimes that outside view, presented
by a neutral party who's "in your corner" can be a big help.
Best of luck and please let your friends here know how it's going.
Steve
|
646.43 | Action better than Wondering | ANT::MPCMAIL | | Mon Jan 23 1989 10:51 | 28 |
| After reading and re-reading this notes file I as the Noter feel
I must step in and again make another reply.
Mom says that she does feel rejected in the part of "I am the
parent that raised you and I love you, I'll never understand why
you feel this way and why you feel you must search, but I know that
since you are legally adult and supposedly mature to make decisions
I can not stop you in anyway. I just hope you remember that we love
you. A blessing no matter how small for me it is a blessing.
646.42. Pls try counselling to help
>>> outlook might be wrong
Your right my outlook might be wrong but again it might be right
no-one will know except for what the agency told me when I went
down there in person and sat face to face with one of the counsellors
there. they told me that my bio-parents met at college and poof
there I was, that tells me that I was illegimate probably not wanted,
and definetly not expected. But again I say the women had guts not
to risk a back street abortion, but went through the humilition
of being unwed pregnant and being hidden somewhere for 9 months
of her life. To me that takes guts.
If nothing else if she turns me down at least I can say I tried
That is better than sitting my whole life through and wondering.
Lisa
|
646.44 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Split Decision | Mon Jan 23 1989 11:29 | 14 |
| re: .43
I agree with you that "Action is better than Wondering" and
surely wish you well in your search. Also, I didn't mean
to imply that your outlook might be wrong - it just wasn't
clear to me from earlier writings that you'd considered some
of the possible outcomes; thanx for the clarification. Seems
like you've taken all you can into consideration (including
counselling). . .what can friends do but hope that everything
works out well for you and your people, particularly your
adoptive mother?
Steve
|