T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
573.1 | my 2 cents werf | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Wed Aug 31 1988 15:26 | 21 |
| many people need time to themselves, time to see their friends,
time to play with hobbies the two of you might not necessarily share.
Coming from where I've been (where else can I come from?) - I'd
say that if we agree we are SO's, one day and one weekend per week
doesn't come close to the time I'd want to spend with them. And,
of course, the time spent together doesn't necessarily have to be
"dating" time, or "quality" time. You can be seeing friends together,
doing chores, shopping, reading quietly, listening to music, seeing
a movie....just plain togetherness counts, too. I have never had
an SO I didn't either almost-live-with (i.e. have separate apartments
but nearly live together anyways), or completely-live-with. But
that's just me. SO is a pretty serious thing in my book. But you
said you were talking about dating-type situations, so I can't help
too much there. I have a friend I like a great deal now, and he
and I spend maybe 8-10 hours a week together (whether it be alone,
with friends, whatever)...but I wouldn't call him an SO.
-Jody
|
573.2 | Weekends, that's the ticket! | PARITY::DDAVIS | THINK SUNSHINE | Wed Aug 31 1988 15:27 | 13 |
| Gail,
I tend to agree with your "SO".
I can keep myself very busy during the week, it's the weekends, which I
call "prime time" that I think should be spent together having fun. And
one night during the week is usually a treat or something special.
I guess it's an individual need or want. But I would certainly
try to come to some agreement with your "SO" if you are unhappy
with the situation.
-Dotti.
|
573.3 | My copper Lincoln's worth... | NYEM1::COHEN | aka JayCee...I LOVE the METS & #8! | Wed Aug 31 1988 15:48 | 31 |
| Gail,
Considering the fact that I was the one that started the "BIG C"
note, I guess I should comment here as well...I agree with you.
I want to spend much more time with my guy than I get to spend...
he has to "have his space". And the worst is that if I spend a
Saturday night doing something else, I don't get to see him at all
that week...I have since come to find out (and i think that this
is true for both men and women...no bias here!) is that if they
aren't willing to spend more time, it's because they aren't sure
of the relationship...where it is...where it's going....what is
should/shouldn't be. It doesn't make my happy, in fact it usually
pisses me off...I find that I can't do anything about it because
he doesn't want to spend more time with me...talk about a blow to
the ego...and I either have to accept it, or get out of the
relationship. At this point, I'm not sufficiently frustrated enough
to get out, but I fear that the time is coming and soon. Some people
need alot of time together, some don't....I do, and my "boyfriend"
doesn't....he's happy the way things are, so it's up to me to either,
as the expression goes, sh*t or get off the pot! It all depends
on what YOU need....although you have to take both people into account,
remember that you are still the most important to you, and have
to take care of yourself before anyone else can take care of you.
If you need more time from your SO, ask for it...if he can't give
it, you may have to reset your priorities!
Whatever happens, good luck...stay in control of yourself, and all
will work out.
Jill
|
573.4 | my feelings. | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | i m!te B blonde but !'m not stup!d. | Wed Aug 31 1988 15:48 | 19 |
|
i dont know, i think this is a fine line...
i feel if you are not careful you can drive a person away,
unintentionally (sp?).. anyway some people need to connect more
offen than the other person, if this is the case the other person
whats to be seperate (space i guess) my only suggestion to you
is to seek out other people to fill that need. that way you are
both getting what you need.
its hard... sometimes... i know that when i was in a relationship
this past year, everything was done together, i didnt say anything,
but i was feeling smothered things backed off some and i was getting
comfortable, then things changed some more and committments elsewhere
were pushing us apart. i think that if people care enough about
each other they can do things for each other to make each other
happy... and try and spend the quality time to get the relationship
back on track..
|
573.5 | ........... | PHILEM::MATTHEWS | i m!te B blonde but !'m not stup!d. | Wed Aug 31 1988 15:56 | 9 |
|
re:3 sorry yea beat me too it... p.s.
your intutions are right in target, i think....
i should have gotten out long time ago, cause maybe that person
might have realized that they better get moving as well, and maybe
the course of the relationship could have been changed.... but it
didnt happen...
|
573.6 | | CGVAX2::MICHAELS | | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:01 | 15 |
| Hi Gail,
I would agree with your SO. Taking time for yourself can be
refreshing. Did you ever consider taking up a hobby? I value my
time alone because it makes me appreciate being with my SO more.
For instance, I play piano, crotchet and knit, attend school, prepare
homework, and when we get together, my attention is on him, not
me. I guess I want to say that giving attention to myself is just
as important as giving attention to anyone else. Sometimes I need
the time to unwind and get refreshed.
Being alone is not the same as being lonely. Keep happy, Gail!
Susan
|
573.7 | Two bits from a married person | CLAY::HUXTABLE | Dancing Light | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:17 | 55 |
| Gail, in a "just dating" situation the "weekend and maybe one
day" per week feels about right to me, and it's too much if
just dating means dating other people, too. When I was
dating someone "seriously," meaning (mostly) not dating other
people, it was usually weekend, one or two nights a week, and
(occasionally) phone calls. The difference between "just
dating" and "dating seriously" for me was less in how much
more time we spent together than in what we did and how we
felt about each other.
Personally, I've never had an SO I wasn't living with (or
married to). But then, I never dated someone "seriously" for
more than eight months or so before we moved in together.
If you're living together, married or not, you're going to
spend more time with each other. My SO and I find that we
*must* have some time to do things without each other; one
night a week for each of us is about right. Furthermore,
they're *not* the same night: I like having a night out
alone or with other people as well as an evening alone at
home. A lot of the time that we spend "together" is quite
solitary, as we're both intense readers and programmers, and
often one of us is absorbed in a novel while the other is
absorbed in a programming problem on the computer.
You and your SO may, as my SO and I do, have quite different
social needs. You may enjoy spending time with him because
that meets a need you have to spend time with people, he may
have much less need to spend time with people. This is true
for me, and I have recently begun to make a conscious effort
to do social things with my friends and family occasionally,
so that I feel less strong a need to badger John to spend
time with me, or go to a party with me, when he's not
necessarily interested in doing so. In return, he's been
*more* willing to do social things with me, like going to a
movie or to dinner with friends. I feel happier (because my
needs are met more closely) and stronger (because I figured
out something that was bothering me and *did* something about
it) and John feels happier (because I'm not leaning on him so
much).
You may want to sit down and really think about what needs
your relationship with your SO satisfies for you (or could,
if you were spending the time together you'd like to). If it
turns out that some of them can be met in part in other ways,
like some of my "social" needs, you may find that you are
both happier if you work things out for yourself. Your SO
may otherwise feel like you're depending on him for
*everything*, and feel justifiably uneasy about being able to
satisfy *all* your needs.
I've rambled a bit from your original question. Good luck in
working things out comfortably for you both!
-- Linda
|
573.8 | I'm listening | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:33 | 14 |
| a bit more clarity...
By just dating I mean as apposed to married or living together. I
guess you could call it serious as we have agreed not to see other
people. And by getting together I don't mean having to do dating
things, I just mean spending time doing things you may have just
as well done alone at home such as reading or watching a movie on
TV. I mean how much of his space am I taking up by going over so we can
watch the game together? And not to mention it takes me an hour
to get there to drop by.
Gail
|
573.9 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Waiter, there's a bug in my code | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:54 | 29 |
| Gail,
Would taking a poll really solve anything? From what I read in your
note, you aren't happy with the amount of time your SO is devoting to
you and want more. That's perfectly reasonable. But what would a poll
prove?
Suppose 83% of the people in this conference think you should be happy
with what you have. It doesn't prove anything. The point is that *you*
are unhappy with the amount of time *you're* getting. The 83% don't
count for diddlysquat. If *you* think you're not getting enough time,
then you're not getting enough time.
Similarly, if 83% of the people in this conference think you're not
getting enough time, it still doesn't matter. The point is that your SO
appears to be uncomfortable with more time.
The real problem is that the two of you have a problem. Polls won't
help anything (unless you're planning on having 2.1 children and living
in a house with 1.9 TVs, .7 VCRs, 3.4 phones, and 1.3 cats, in which
case feel free to dismiss my rantings and carry on).
There may be no real solution to your problem. Your SO may be unwilling
to give you more time, in which case you have to learn to live with it,
or find someone better suited to you. But there probably is. Would you
like some suggestions? This is a good group, and I'm sure we can come
up with one or two.
Jon
|
573.10 | quality time, hmph | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:21 | 20 |
| re .9
Jon, I agree a poll is not going to solve a thing. My point was
to get a feel for what other people thought. My SO is trying to
sell me the idea that what he has been saying to me is not just
his personal opinion (which of course it is) but rather the way
"everyone else" would think. For my own peace of mind I was looking
for some reassurance that my thinking on the situation wasn't so
as unreasonable as he might imply.
And your right, we need to come to an agreement to suite us, both
our needs. When you get back to the BIG C issue, I would say that this
is one of the issues that we are commited to work on, we have too.
I can't make the jump to say that I should find someone else that
fits the bill as far as time needs are concerned, we both see this
as a workable issue. I only wish to find some possible avenues of
compromise.
Gail
|
573.11 | More musings... | CLAY::HUXTABLE | Dancing Light | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:22 | 42 |
| Gail, one thing bothers me a little...in .8 you implied that
some/most of what you're interested in doing with your SO are
things that you could "do just as well alone," such as
watching TV or reading. But back in .0 you said something
like (I think I've got the meaning right, if not the words)
"if he's so committed to this relationship, why doesn't he
want to spend more time together?"
Umm...the implication I get here is that for you doing
*anything* together shows a commitment to the relationship,
but a commitment to the relationship (in my book) means
actively working to improve the relationship and grow in it
as individuals. Assuming that I'm not way off base...I would
disagree that watching TV together (or whatever) shows a
commitment to the relationship. Sure, it's fun, it feels
good to be around your SO even if you're not explicitly
touching or talking. But I don't think it does much to
improve your relationship, or help each of you grow in it.
Maybe he really *does* feel committed to working on this
relationship with you, but it's really difficult for him to
do as part of watching TV together, when his mind is on the
tube. Maybe he feels like time spent with you needs to be
quality time, time committed to growing in your relationship
together, and to him that *doesn't* include lounging around
watching TV together. (Always assume the best about someone
else; they'll usually live up to it.) This might especially
be true if he knows you're looking for "commitment" (as
you've said you are) and doesn't realize that may include
(for you) time spent "doing nothing." If commitment to the
relationship for *him* means something more active, he may
need the lounging around time *alone* as a way to give his
psyche a rest.
Well, I'm doing a lot of speculating on rather little
information, and as Jon (I think, .9 anyway) points out, what
works for us may not amount to a hill of beans for the two of
you. I guess what it comes down to is the two of you need to
figure out what you each need, and why, and how to get it
without trampling on each other. And it's still easier said
than done!
-- Linda
|
573.12 | as much as possible | YODA::BARANSKI | Searching for Peace | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:30 | 6 |
| I like to spend as much time as possible with my SO... Yet there are times when
one wants to do things the other doesn't want to do... Then again, I've never
reached the state of social exclusivity, there are always more things I want to
do with more people.... :-)
Jim.
|
573.13 | "Time Sharing" | IPOVAX::VENDMGMT | | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:31 | 39 |
|
Hi Gail,
I like this topic. I've got the same thing going on in my relationship
although the situation is a little different. My SO and I have
a serious relationship (not seeing anyone else) but we spend A LOT
of our spare time together. About 99% of it. He doesnt spend
much time with his friends and he feels he should do that more but
is still happy spending a lot time together. What I"m finding for
myself is this: The more time I spend with him, as time goes on,
the more I feel uncomfortable when I not with him. Uncomfortable
meaning lonely or bored. What I need to do is to find things to
do for myself - not just to fill my time when we're not together,
but because I sincerely want to fulfill my own needs more and not
put that responsibility on to him. It is crucial, I feel, to keep
your independence to a point. If not, its very easy to fall into
the trap of needing someone to make you happy. I dont believe in
that. I dont know if this is what you're feeling, but it can
snowball before you know it.
I dont feel there is a right and wrong amount of time to spend
together. Weather it be a couple of days out of the week, or every
night, it depends on the couple's choice. And where it differs
in your case, I agree with the majority of answers here, if a
compromise cant be made, and your still not feeling good about it,
you might decide to find someone closer suited to you.
Easier said than done, I know. I hope this helped a little.
Diane
re.-1
I dont think she was looking for actual percentages but just about
some other people's situations. I find that asking how other people handle
certain situations helps me out too. I dont think there is anything
wrong with that.
|
573.14 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:32 | 31 |
|
OK, since you're looking for other people's 'opinions'-
my husband and I have been practically 'glued at the hip'
from the day we met...almost immediately, we spent almost
every weeknight and most of the weekend, together. Usually
I would beg off once or twice a week, just so I could get
my laundry done and dust occasionally. Since we work in
the same building, we drive to and from work together, often
have lunch together, and send mail to each other periodically.
He commented the other day that we are so close, he's now
dreaming MY dreams!
My first husband and I were almost this close also, until the
last year of our marriage.
I am very close to the special folks in my life...lots of physical
mental and emotional contact.
I know this all sounds very sappy and I also know that the majority
of peole just don't understand-they perceive so much togetherness
as a sign of insecurity or dependence. As long as it works for
us, though, I don't mind what others thing...come to think of it,
these are the same people who said I would 'spoil' my baby by holding
him a lot, and never letting him cry. 8 years later he is the most
independent, secure child I've ever seen...still gets/gives lots
of hugs and kisses though!!
Deb
|
573.15 | issues may be hidden under the time conflicts... | SSDEVO::ACKLEY | wow | Wed Aug 31 1988 18:09 | 26 |
| I have a friend I go cycling (bicycle) with regularly. He really
wants to get in shape bad, and this is his chosen method. His
girlfriend gets bent out of shape *every* time he wants to go
riding after work.
He tried to work around this, encouraging her to get a good
bike, and inviting her to come on rides, but she always refuses
to come along. So he comes and rides with me, and then she gives
him the silent treatment.
She wants to spend every available moment together, but
refuses to get into the activities that he's into. He likes
spending time with her, but feels that he can't just stop doing
everything he likes just cause she's not into it. He has come
into her life, but she does not come into his. She expresses
feelings of rejection every time he goes to do what he wants,
if it is not something she's also into. (she also rules the
TV, the stereo....)
I'm not saying this is like your situation, it's just the
scene I've been seeing lately. In their case the real problem
is not the amount of time spent together (although this is what
she'd complain about) it's her refusal to even consider what he
wants to do as a viable alternative. I doubt if they'll last
much longer as a couple.
Alan.
|
573.16 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Waiter, there's a bug in my code | Wed Aug 31 1988 18:23 | 9 |
| re .10:
Gail, if he's trying to sell you an idea, then he's trying to sell you
an idea. You're not a statistic, you're a human being. Don't fall for
it. Attack the problem, not the smokescreen. Even if everyone else *is*
happy with that much time, you're not everyone else, and he's not
everyone else's SO.
Jon
|
573.17 | | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Wed Aug 31 1988 18:26 | 7 |
| People definitely need time to themselves, some more than others.
(I'm near the extreme on the 'more' side.) Perhaps a better approach
would be to define how much time or which times you'll spend apart,
doing your own things, even if those things could be done together.
I spend a lot of time reading, but I frequently find that having
another person in the same room is very distracting. I don't enjoy
reading as much when that happens and it makes me grumpy.
|
573.18 | | PIWACT::KLEINBERGER | Dont worry, Be happy | Wed Aug 31 1988 19:37 | 26 |
| well, now that I have read all the replies...
I think if he is an *SO*, and committed to be an SO, then you should
expect to have the majority of his non-self time together. What
you two need to define is what is the non-self time?... It could
well be that his non-self time is only one night a week, and one
day on the weekend... if that is the case, then I think you should
be allowed to have part of both of those days/evenings...
If I am dating someone, I don't particularity care if I see them
X% of the week, as long as I know I have a time to look forward
to seeing them again. However, on the other end of the spectrum,
I enjoy talkig to them on the phone late at night... I have been
accused of not giving men their space because I like talking at
night (I've been told - if they want to talk to you they will call)
in a way, I guess its the same as wanting to have their personal
time, but I can never see it in the same way.
I agree with Jon Callas, if you are feeling uncomfortable, now is
the time to say something... talk it out and come to some sort of
agreement, before one of you feel smothered, and you lose out on
what might be a good relationship....
Just my four cents worth..
Gale
|
573.19 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Thu Sep 01 1988 04:17 | 46 |
| In the note about the "Big C," quite a few people recommended
to Jill that she give the man some space, but it kind of sounds
like what happened was that he reacted in a way that Jill saw
as initially positive (in terms of his needing LESS space once
she was willing to offer him more,) but that the changes turned
out to be not nearly enough to make Jill happy (if I interpreted
your note in this topic correctly, Jill.) :)
The main thing to understand is that there is not necessarily
a "cure" for a person's not wanting to spend more time with
you (whether you give him more space, less space, an ultimatim
or convince him that he is being unreasonable.) No matter what
you say to him (or how you feel,) you may never convince him
that he needs to change. Even if you *did* convince him to
change, it could always backfire on you later (meaning that
his original reluctance could come out to you in other ways
that are even less fun than what you are experiencing now.)
As others have said, the main thing you have to figure out
is whether or not you can live with this kind of relationship
(spending less time together than you would like) and be happy.
It may sound unfair, but there is no good way to compromise
in a situation where one person does not want to be with the
other at certain times. (Just think how you would feel if
someone convinced you to be somewhere that you didn't want to
be for X number of nights per week. I don't know about you,
but I, myself, would react rather badly to that. I would
start resenting the person fairly quickly, I think.)
You need to decide what's right for you in this (because you
already know what he wants.) Things could change somewhere
down the road, but there is no guarantee of that. If you
count on it, you could be very disappointed.
You might try stopping to think about what all this free time
could mean to you (in case there is some personal project or
hobby you've been dying to do, or in the event that there is
personal business on your end that needs work.) It may turn
out that you can think of a few tremendous advantages in having
so much time to yourself (in which case, you and he no longer
have a problem!)
Best luck, in any case. I know this can't be easy for either
of you to be going through.
Suzanne
|
573.20 | there's no set answer | SALEM::SAWYER | Alien. On MY planet we reason! | Thu Sep 01 1988 05:32 | 26 |
|
2 people can be in love and spend 95% of their non-work time together
and be very happy.
or 2 people can spend 99% of their free time together and get
sick of each other....
or 2 people can spend one or 2 days a week together and be
very happy...
or not be happy about it all....
1 person may want to spend all their free time together while
the mate only wants to spend 40-50%....
it's all different
it all depends...
what can you take?
how much can you give?
how much do you want to give...or take?
how little or how much are you willing to settle for?
i've been in relationships that i spent all my free time in
and i've been in relationships where we only saw each other once
or twice a week....
and been happy in both
and been unhappy in both....
|
573.21 | Gort rambles about personal time and relationships | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Thu Sep 01 1988 05:59 | 24 |
| Its not the amount of time that counts its the quality.
I have run into this problem before a few times.
I have eventualy gotten out of the relationship because the deman
on my time was too great. I need time and space to myself to do
things for myself like:Think,clean house,read,visit family & friends
,ect. The last time i encountered this I wwas dating a woman that
wanted me with her whenever I was not here at work. She lived in
her own apartment which was smallish and low maintence. I on the
other hand live in a 4 bedroom house with a large yard pets to care
for couldent find enough time to spend all of my off time with her.
Granted I'm a bachelor that dosent lead the neatest lifestyle all
the time so I need time to catch up. Now I suppose that I could
have asked her over to either help or watch me clean house but
thats not as easy as it sounds. I dont feel real comfortible asking
someone to clean up *my* mess and if I do the work(while she watches)
I feel like I'm neglecting her.
I was often made to feel guilty/selfish because I needed time so
even tho every other aspect of our relationship was great I bailed
out I just couldent handle it.
Let go a little and you may find he wants to spend more time with
you than you thought because the pressure is off.
-j
|
573.22 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Thu Sep 01 1988 06:30 | 4 |
| re.15
Alan, I think your friend is dating my ex girlfriend from -.1 8^)
-j
|
573.23 | | RATTLE::MONAHAN | | Thu Sep 01 1988 10:08 | 38 |
| My SO and I spend all of our time together. I really enjoy our
time together because not only are we lovers, we're best friends.
I enjoy going out for a romantic evening together, but sometimes
when we go out we act silly. We're just "chumming" around. We
share all the same interests and enjoy all the same activities.
I think this is the main reason that we spend all of our time together,
well........that and the fact that we're engaged!
BUT, sometimes I feel that I'm neglecting my own needs and my chores
around the house. I *do* enjoy all of our time together but at
the same time I need time alone to take care of myself. I don't
do this nearly often enough; I sometimes stay home on Sat. until
the early afternoon taking care of my chores. Every now and then
I'll take one night during the week to take care of things I need
to do, look at wedding gowns, or spend time with friends. This
is *very* good for our relationship because one night without seeing
each other makes the following evening much more special.
I think that this is perfect for us because we *both* enjoy spending
all of our time together. If he decides that he wants a night off,
I give him his space. I respect him enough to do that and he's
the same way with me.
If you're not happy in the relationship, my advice would be to see
other people when you're away from him (after telling him you want
to do this!). I've had *several* relationships in my time that
I now can't understand why I stayed in them. I believe that in
order to have a healthy relationship you need to be happy with it,
of course. It doesn't seem as though you are.
I don't believe a relationship should exist unless *both* partners
are happy with the relationship and where it's heading.
Hope this helped!
Denise
|
573.24 | lets turn the tables | CADSE::SIMONICH | | Thu Sep 01 1988 14:17 | 12 |
|
Gail,
Putting pressure on your so will not do any good. He
obviously needs time of his own to do his own things. Perhaps
he is not as commited to the relationship as you are.
I recall you said in the "big c" note that you backed off and
he realized what you ment to him. Why not try it again?
good luck Dave
|
573.25 | This is a tough one... | HPSTEK::RJONES | | Thu Sep 01 1988 14:24 | 26 |
| Gail,
Wow! I don't know how much I can contribute to this discussion
which has not already been hit on. It's true that every person has
a different idea of how much time that person should spend with
their SO. Unfortunately, when one member wants much more time together
than the other, a self-destructive situation usually develops where
one partner feels neglected and the other becomes irritated and
constrained. Often this leads to a one-sided relationship resulting
in a lower self-esteem in the person desiring more time together
and guilt in the second partner may turn into ambivalence.
You can usually tell when your SO feels that you are infringing
upon their space. Look for feedback. You should be hearing the same
types of things that you are saying to your SO. If you are not,
something is wrong. Try holding back. An unfortunate fact of human
psychology is that people are not easily satisfied with what they
can easily get and covet what they don't have. Let your SO contact
you and make the arrangements for meeting over the next couple of
weeks. You may find that when you are not pushing it, your SO will
pick up the slack on his own. If you find that this is not working,
then you may need to decide whether or not you are happy with the
relationship as it stands and the amount of time you spend together.
If it comes to this point, be sure that you tell your SO how important
it is to you and how crucial it is to your relationship.
Good Luck!
|
573.26 | Thank you for the responses | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Thu Sep 01 1988 15:12 | 27 |
| re .21 > Let go a little and you may find he wants to spend more time with
> you than you thought because the pressure is off.
I like that point, I think it is quite relavent to my situation.
I think this whole issue had snowballed and some pressure was being
felt on both sides. I think the idea to try and back off a little
would be well worth the effort. It has always been difficult for
me to work in that middle ground. I've always been an all or nothing
at all person. I think this point might be a middle ground I can
work around, as could he. ...the incredibly obvious isn't always
the easiest to see.
re .24 Luckly the Big C is no longer an issue. In fact it was my
SO that encouraged me to seek the advice of others. Who better to
turn to than the H_R community. We both recognized the problem and
are determined to work out a compromise for the sake of peace in
the relationship. Had there been less commitment it would have been
easy to take advise such as been offered here of "Go find someone
who can meet this need". That, as I said in the Big C note, is not
what a commitment is all about.
And BTW: My So and I sat down last night and went through the
responses of this note, we discussed and considered the points brought
up. It made for some useful communication. We thank you for all
your input.
Gail
|
573.27 | an observation or 2 | VINO::CRITZ | Richard -- KB4N/1 | Thu Sep 01 1988 16:09 | 23 |
| I don't normally follow this conference but this note was sent my way by a
friend for comment and I can't help throwing in my 2� worth...
As technically oriented folks, we have to guard against trying define a human
interaction in hard and fast rules. Several previous respondents have talked
of "defining the parameters" of the relationship. It's an easy trap to fall in
and I'll bet many of us have done so at one time or another -- I sure have!
What this approach fails to recognize is that we are not microprogrammable gate
arrays, bound by some sense of logical (?) behavior, however obscure.
I also get the distinct impression this inability to agree on how much time to
spend together is a symptom rather than the actual problem. Jon gets at the
same thing -- locate and treat the real problem.
In any relationship, there are going to be times when one has to accept a
circumstance that is less optimal than desired; that's the nature of
compromise. The difficulty arises when either a) no compromise is possible or
b) only one member of the relationship yields. You both have to be willing to
bend towards the other. Attempting to establish inflexible "boundary
parameters" only gets in the way of achieving a true resolution.
-r
|
573.29 | Another vote for lotsa time together. | CSC32::DELKER | | Fri Sep 02 1988 20:23 | 51 |
| Whew, that's a lot of replies to wade through, but I didn't want
to reply before reading them. Somewhere about .6 or .7, I remember
thinking of one of my measurements of a relationship - do I enjoy
spending time with the other person more than I enjoy my time alone?
To me, if I don't prefer time with the other person to being
alone, then I wouldn't commit myself to them exclusively. (I guess
what I'm saying is, if he doesn't want to spend *lots* of time
with you, then why does he have SO status?) To me, an SO is someone
you *do* spend most of you away-from-work time with; but then, I'm
one of those people who gets real involved in a relationship I'm
committed to.
I was in a situation similar to yours once. He didn't want to spend
as much time together as I did, but he didn't put any restrictions
on me, either (which I would have been only too willing to put upon
myself, if I got what I needed from him). Anyway, I dated other
guys, and had other male friends that I spent time with - they knew
about the other fellow from the start, that he was my primary interest,
and there'd be no hanky-panky. And he knew I went out with others
when he wouldn't see me, and never objected to that; however, I
don't think he ever went out with anyone else - he just needed time
alone or with his best friends. We eventually broke up, because
he never did give me what I needed emotionally.
As for backing off, I did that at one point and things improved
for a while, but we didn't resolve anything.
What I've noticed about myself recently is that I get so wrapped
up in a relationship that if I don't have other interests, I depend
on that relationship for most of my happiness. When I get excited
about doing something else (like taking evening classes), then I
feel better about myself, more well-adjusted, and more independent.
Then I can quit whining about someone not giving me what I want
from them, and we're both happier, he stops feeling pressured, and
I ultimately get pretty much what I wanted in the first place.
However, I still think of an SO-type relationship being more like
a live-together (or almost) type situation. Sure, when your
schedules or commitments conflict, you each do your own thing,
and don't make each other feel guilty about that. I think the
bicycle rider's girlfriend (from a previous response) is way out
of line. But I don't understand how a relationship where there's
a commitment by both parties can have time restrictions put on it.
[Quotas??]
I will say that I've heard things similar to what your SO has
expressed, and I've never understood that attitude. I finally
figured I just hadn't met the right one.
Good luck to you (both).
Paula
|
573.31 | I need my time alone... | UPOVAX::BECKER | | Wed Sep 07 1988 11:56 | 33 |
| Gail,
I honestly believe that people need a certain amount of "space"
for themselves. About 3 years ago I broke up with my SO because
he wanted all of our time spent together. Im a very independant
person and it really bothered me that he never went out with the
guys, never went up flying WITHOUT me (his personal hobby), etc.
while I like to shop with "the girls", have dinner with my best
friend every now and then WITHOUT the guys, sit alone and read books,
listen to music etc.
Once he was gone I missed him terribly because I really did love
him. He called me, we got together and talked out this very problem.
Now, 3 years later we live together and have a wedding planned.
We have as equal an amount of time together as we do apart - I
understand that his wanting to be with me is his way of showing
me how much he cares. He understands that I love him just as much
but need those times to chum with friends, spend a Saturday shopping
with my mom or even seclude myself in another room with a good book.
And best of all he's started to get together with his friends, started
to fly alot more than he used to and went back to school a couple
of nites a week.
I think now he realizes how important this time is and we get a
real kick out of sitting on the couch with some nice cozy music
or having a nice meal and telling each other what we did that day.
I think that even though we have this time apart, the first one
we want to share it all with when its over is each other. Its brought
us much closer together and it makes the days when we are together
"full-time" exciting and special.
Maureen
|
573.32 | Being happy with yourself | REGENT::NIKOLOFF | channel one = Lazaris | Wed Sep 07 1988 15:27 | 8 |
|
re: Maureen, what a lovely reply. I totally agreed with you and
had a similair relationship acouple years ago. I also felt pretty
smuthered when I couldn't go out with my friends and *just* have time
alone. I feel to be a complete person you have to have the best of
both worlds and lucky you, you seem to have found it.
|
573.33 | From the smothered point of view... | WMOIS::E_FINKELSEN | | Wed Sep 07 1988 16:59 | 32 |
| I'm going to apologize now if this turns out to be a long note....warning!
I love going out with my friends or my sister and sometimes having friends over.
My husband enjoys doing things with other people once he is doing it but will
not initiate. The only time he will seek male companionship is when I am going
out with the girls. He seems to hate to be alone, although he won't admit it.
Maybe he can't admit it to himself. If I have friends over and spend my time
visiting with them in a different room, so as not to bother him and able to have
private conversations (girl talk they don't feel comfortable saying in front of
him) he acts totally irrational when they leave. One time I had 3 girl friends
over and we were in the study wrapping presents while he was in the living room.
That night when I got into bed, he gave a big huff and took his pillow to
another room. It took me almost an hour to get him to explain why he was upset
and even then he didn't give me the real reason. (I guess he didn't know why he
was upset himself) I have since figured out that he is jeolous when I have a
good time with someone other than him. I try to let him know that I need to be
with the girls once in a while and that it doesn't mean I'm avoiding him. I
don't go out drinking, just shopping or visiting.... I keep telling him to go
out with his friends, that he needs his time away from me too. But, unless I'm
planning something with another man's wife he won't think of getting together
with that man. There was a point where I would have to arrange a "play mate"
for him before I finalized plans for myself.
Lately I have been getting frustrated and bitchy for no good reason and after
reading these replies, I now know why. I'm smothered! The only time I get to
myself is when he's in school. (he gives my about 5 hours a week when school is
in session). If I should go out with friends while he is locked up in his
room studying, he'll be jeolous again and want to go with me even though he
can't really give up his study time. 2 more years of school, full time! Can
I handle it?
Thanks. Now that I got that off my chest, it's time to go home. :^)
|
573.34 | Dont give it up | UPOVAX::BECKER | | Thu Sep 08 1988 10:27 | 25 |
| Whatever you do don't give up that time for yourself. I tried that
for a while and it only made things worse. I resented him for HAVING
to give up my time because he would sulk and then I was miserable.
I guess the best thing you can do is talk to him, let him know that
he is very important part of your life but you have other personal
needs as well. Id also make a habit of getting out of the house
when you see your friends, etc. Its hard to have a good time when
you know that someone else is sulking in another room. I think
that once Ron got used to the fact that I was not going to give
up these times for him that he eventually got used to it, and once
faced with being in the house for a certain amount of time he started
calling his friends again or using the time for his own little
projects.
Another important part of it is that once I got home from whatever
it was that I did I made a point out of sharing that with him, laughing
over the things that happened during the day - the next day Id make
him a special meal for supper and do something special with him
in appreciation for understanding (or trying to) the need for the
time I had to have to myself. Its not a problem for us anymore.
I wish you a lot of luck
Maureen
|
573.35 | The 1 - 24 test | GYPSC::BINGER | ANSWERS!! No no I have the questions | Fri Sep 09 1988 03:45 | 12 |
| Ask the 1 - 24 test. Of the 24 the hours in the day how many
would he like to spend with you. Ask yourself the same question.
You then have a *simple* measure of your feelings for each other.
Keep it simple and forget boring things like work etc.
The next question is can you accept the difference. One or two hours
difference is easy. More than that might mean that you need someone
who is all or nothing and he requires someone to fill the time between
the chores.
Good luck.
|
573.36 | Paying or being serious | GYPSC::BINGER | ANSWERS!! No no I have the questions | Fri Sep 09 1988 04:06 | 15 |
| To explain the 1 - 24 test.
I could never feel comfortable with a complete stranger watching me
clean my teeth, shoes etc. I would feel the need to converse if there were
a complete stranger there while reading the news paper.
On the other hand... With someone who is rated up near 24...
24/24 is perhaps not possible. At the begining somewhere up here
is necessary to get things started.
To comment on the other notes. The *playing hard to get* may bring
short term returns. If you are *playing* then it a lot of fun. If
on the other hand you are being serious?
Good luck
|
573.37 | TGIF | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Fri Sep 09 1988 14:13 | 19 |
| > To comment on the other notes. The *playing hard to get* may bring
> short term returns. If you are *playing* then it a lot of fun. If
> on the other hand you are being serious?
I agree, playing hard to get is a short term solution, very short.
I feel it falls into the "playing games" catagory and hopefully
2 adults don't need to be playing these kinds of games. I for one
refuse to play pretend, ie: "I'm going to pretend that I don't want
to see you." In the hope that I will be viewed as more desirable because
I am less available. I think that's crap.
I don't really understand what your talking about as far as rating
someone, but I don't think that that is any solution to real time
problems. Maybe that idea will benefit others.
Gail
|
573.38 | Love his time away | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Our common crisis | Mon Sep 26 1988 12:31 | 6 |
|
Love and defend his time away from the relationship - just as
much - as you'd love and defend your own time - wherever you choose
to spend it.
Joe Jas
|