| Title: | What's all this fuss about 'sax and violins'? |
| Notice: | Archived V1 - Current conference is QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS |
| Moderator: | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI |
| Created: | Fri May 09 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 26 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1327 |
| Total number of notes: | 28298 |
This note has been contributed by a member of our community who wishes
to remain anonymous. If you wish to contact the author by MAIL, please
contact QUARK::HR_MODERATOR. - Steve
I know a man who loves to cuddle and talk, kiss and hug for hours before
and/or instead of intercourse. He says the anatomy is basically the same,
that intimacy doesn't require an orgasm.
I know another man who wants to have intercourse first, then to talk
and cuddle after. He says "I've never had a bad orgasm".
Questions:
Does intimacy require intercourse? For men? For women?
Do all men "need" an orgasm before they open up?
Do all women "need" an orgasm before they open up?
Which attitude is more common of men under 30, over 30, over 40?
Which attitude is more common of women under 30, over 30, over 40?
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 485.1 | Be careful with sentence contexts | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Turning down to Zero | Tue Mar 22 1988 07:26 | 33 |
| 485.2 | MANANA::RAVAN | Tryin' to make it real... | Tue Mar 22 1988 09:35 | 28 | |
| 485.3 | NCVAX1::COOPER | If this is love, I'd prefer lunch! | Tue Mar 22 1988 13:33 | 35 | |
| 485.5 | From her side... | ENDPT::GIRARD | Thu Mar 24 1988 06:39 | 8 | |
| 485.6 | Always should be... | COMET::AIKALA | Future Lamborghini Owner | Thu Mar 24 1988 07:28 | 22 |
| 485.8 | My 2 cents | MRED::BURTON | Thu Mar 24 1988 15:35 | 30 | |
| 485.12 | What's all this about her first.... | CADSE::DUNTON | Frankly my dear..... | Fri Mar 25 1988 09:26 | 13 |
| 485.13 | If she wants it, I want it... | COMET::AIKALA | Future Lamborghini Owner | Fri Mar 25 1988 10:04 | 17 |
| 485.14 | Moderatort comment | BRONS::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Fri Mar 25 1988 12:45 | 24 |
The only discussion ever deletd out of this file wholesale as
being considered by managment to be inappropriate for a
corporate document was one that delt explicitly with sex. It is
my opinion as moderator that some of the notes in this
discussion have wandered across the same dividing line.
I am asking my comoderators to consider the propriety of this
discussion, and whether any of the notes here ought to be
deleted. If many of them are, it is my opinion that the
responses that reply directly to them and which would now be
difficult to understand probably ought to go, too.
While we're discussing it, please ease up on the cute talk about
sex. Understand that explicit talk about sex is considered to be
objectionable by a number of people, some of whom are in upper
management. What you see as humorous or just candid can be seen
as abusive of corporate resources, and seen that way by people
whose views on the matter count.
As an aside, I ould avoid putting anything very explicit or
"cute" regarding sex in a not that also contained serious
material, as they might end up being deleted together.
JimB.
| |||||
| 485.15 | Moratorium declared | BRONS::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Fri Mar 25 1988 13:02 | 8 |
This discussion has been write locked and all of the responses
set hiddedn because the moderators are up against some real-job
deadlines and haven't got the time to adequately review all of
the replies here regarding their appropriateness in the
conference. Personally, it will be at least three weeks until
things let up for me. I'm sorry that this is a bad time.
JimB.
| |||||