T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
420.1 | Here's my 5 cents worth! | NELSON::DAVAULT | | Wed Oct 14 1987 13:06 | 9 |
| Good topic.
Maybe I'm just old-fashioned but it bugs me when salesmen call me
by my first name. I've also never called my Dr. by his first name
even though he calls me by mine. I'll have to try it and see his
reaction. I also don't like it when small children of friends use
my first name. That's about it.
Susan
|
420.2 | | CHEFS::KEVILLEEVANS | | Wed Oct 14 1987 13:12 | 24 |
| Yes.. I think a title is important.. and I think it is important to the
person who possesses said title because it represents the work, time, effort
etc that went into achieving a goal or ambition.
If I were a doctor I would like very much to be called Doctor Blank, it
would be like saying.. "recognise that which I achieved".
Maybe it is being a bit of a ``Poser'' but that is how I would feel. I worked
hard not to be "just a secretary".. and now when people address me as such
I tell them my `title'... it is not to be a dink, it is just to let them
know.. "hey I did this.. I got out of a nitch, I worked for something and
achieved it"! I never minded being a secretary... I did not even mind being
`just a secretary' most of the time, but now I am a tich more and I like
telling people.. [ when I can get them to listen! ;-) ]
Yup... I say Yes... if a title is what makes a person happy... then use
it! We should all be happy little doo b's!
Sr. Co-ordinator 1st Class GA 8^}
|
420.3 | NO TITLE FOR ME, THANK YOU. | VAXUUM::MUISE | | Wed Oct 14 1987 14:25 | 7 |
| I could do without titles. I take it in stride if someone wants
their title used (Doctor, Mr. Ms. etc.), but I prefer just to be
Jacki. I hate it when friends insist that their children call
me Mrs. Muise. It's harder to say, and I never really think of
myself as Mrs. Muise. I've been Jacki a lot longer.
|
420.4 | | CHISEL::HETRICK | Brian Hetrick | Wed Oct 14 1987 14:45 | 11 |
| "Dr. Jones?" Sure, for an MD in practice, or for a PhD or ScD in
academia. If an earned title is relevant to the circumstances, by all
means the holder can insist that it be used. For a PhD or ScD in the
business world, though, it reeks of posing -- at least in the USA's
"egalitarian" society.
Courtesy titles in general are absurd. For a coworker to demand
a courtesy title ("Miss," "Mr.," "Mrs.," or "Ms.") is ridiculous,
especially in Digital's "first name" culture.
Brian Hetrick
|
420.5 | | DIEHRD::MAHLER | Yugo's for Yo Yo's | Wed Oct 14 1987 14:55 | 4 |
|
Brian, those were my exact sentiments which is great, since
then I don't have to type it in myself! ;-}
|
420.6 | Just Don't Call Me Late For Breakfast | FDCV03::ROSS | | Wed Oct 14 1987 15:39 | 26 |
| When addressing others, I tend to usually call them by their first
names, if I'm not in a patently "parent/child" position, e.g, as
a student I would address my teachers as Mr., Mrs., Miss (Ms. was
not in vogue back then), Professsor, etc.
With M.D.'s, my pattern is that I call my G.P. "Dr. White". Yet
with my shrink who is an M.D., I call him by his first name, although
when I first started seeing him, I agonized for weeks whether to
do this. One night, I brought this up to him. He said to call him
"whatever felt comfortable to me" (typical shrink talk). So I shed
all inhibitions, and started to call him "Larry".
I tend to address PhD's by their first names. When my, God willing,
soon-to-be-ex-wife and I were in Couples counseling, I immediately
called our therapist "Jim" without asking what HE wanted.
I prefer to be called by my first name, even when being addressed
by young children. And I've always told my kids' friends to call
me Alan.
RE: .0
Michael, did you have anybody special in mind when you used the
*hypothetical* example of a "Mr. Sapphire"?
Alan
|
420.7 | ;-} | DIEHRD::MAHLER | Yugo's for Yo Yo's | Wed Oct 14 1987 16:53 | 5 |
|
All similarities are purely hypothetical.
Of course.
|
420.8 | an opinion, and a nit | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | face piles of trials with smiles | Wed Oct 14 1987 16:54 | 10 |
| I feel that certain people should be called by their proper titles,
but when you're familiar enough with someone, you can either ask
them if they'll let you address them more informally, or they'll
ask you themselves to do so.
I can't bear it, but I have this nit to pick. The word is
GRANDIOSE (grand-ee-ose)...not grandoise
-Jody
|
420.9 | don't try to force it down my throat | DONNER::BERRY | Happy Halloween! 8^) | Thu Oct 15 1987 09:15 | 15 |
|
When I was growing up in school, the "big cheese" at the school
was called a "principal." When I had to see this person at my
son's school, I asked about the principal upon arriving. I was
quickly corrected, more than once. The lady in charge, as well
as the ladies that work in the office, informed me that "she"
wasn't a principal, but that she was, "Dr. Jackson."
I wouldn't have thought anythng about it, but after they reprimanded
me about it, I always referred to her as, "Mrs. Jackson."
-Dwight
"I never liked having demands put to me."
|
420.10 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Thu Oct 15 1987 09:54 | 9 |
| re .6:
I assumed that the non-oblique reference to "Mr. Saphire" was to
William Safire, the columnist.
I figured that if Professor Mahler had meant to make reference to
the gem, sapphire, then he would have spelled it correctly.
--Mr Topaz
|
420.11 | | DIEHRD::MAHLER | Yugo's for Yo Yo's | Thu Oct 15 1987 12:58 | 3 |
|
It's Composer Mahler to you, Don.
|
420.12 | | EUREKA::DENISE | everything in moderation... | Thu Oct 15 1987 13:01 | 3 |
| why's that?
HE'S dead!!!!!
|
420.13 | | DIEHRD::MAHLER | Yugo's for Yo Yo's | Thu Oct 15 1987 13:21 | 13 |
|
RE:.8 That SHOULD read:
"I can't bear it, SO I have this nit to pick." Fortunately I don't
correct peoples grammar, or spelling, often so I don't look like
a completely pompous putz.
RE:.10 You ASSumed wrongly. No where did I say I was referring
to a gem of any kind, just a proper name that I created,
hence my disclaimer in .7.
RE:.12 I am?
|
420.14 | Oh please...not at work ! | RDGE28::LIDSTER | Yes...but is it ART ?? | Thu Oct 15 1987 13:40 | 18 |
|
I think if anyone called me by my title at work I would be most
embarrassed (and tired).
It's just a small point but I do not like my daughter calling
adults by their first name - I always find it uncomfortable as I
think it lacks respect. For good friends I always try and persaude
her to prefix it with Auntie or Uncle.
Steve
ps.... For those who wonder about work....
Acting Area Applications Development Group Customer
Adminstrative Systems Support and Implementation Unit Manager
.... so there !!!!!
|
420.15 | | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Thu Oct 15 1987 14:11 | 21 |
| I do not like it when I am addressed by a title + last name simply
because they always get it wrong: I am NOT a PhD, I am NOT a man,
that is NOT how one pronounces Tatistcheff so please don't try because
I get a little sick of giving lessons.
Get a bit fed up, now and then.
I always call a professor by title + last name unless asked to do
otherwise.
Anyone else wishing to be addressed by their title will have to
use mine, then they see my last name and seldom press the issue.
BTW: how do you answer the phone at work?? "Lastname here", "hello",
what? I say "this is Lee" simply because saying Tatistcheff is
too much effort. Then they would like to be connected with Mr or
Dr Tatistcheff and we go into the round-about of explaining that
Mr Tatistcheff Does not work for DEC, but Ms Tatistcheff does and
you are speaking to her......
Lee
|
420.16 | How about 'Citizen'? One title for all... | MANANA::RAVAN | | Thu Oct 15 1987 14:39 | 28 |
| Well, lessee. Miss Manners says that one never uses a title when
referring to oneself - that is, you introduce yourself as "Jane
Doe," not "Ms. Jane Doe." However, I think this applies mainly to
(a) social situations, and (b) social titles. If you're a medical
doctor, you could certainly introduce yourself to a patient as "Doctor
Doe" - but you shouldn't go around addressing the patients
by their first names unless you add, "...and you can call me Jane."
Re .15: Lee, I sympathize. I answer my office phone with "Beth Ravan"
(the name's pronounced "ruh-VAN"), and *invariably* the response is a
pause, followed by "Is Elizabeth Raven (RAY-vun) there?" When I say,
"Speaking," they get a bit flustered. Is it really such a stretch of
the imagination?
Titles, of course, would not help my situation at all.
My biggest beef with titles is that people get *so angry* with other
people who are just trying to do the "right" thing. "I hate it when
kids call me 'Mr.'" vs. "I hate it when kids call me by my first name."
"How dare you call me Mrs. Smith - I'm not his property!" or "How
dare you call me Ms. Doe; I'm *proud* to take the name Smith!"
If everybody could allow themselves to be corrected without
getting upset, and would try to remember how others preferred to be
addressed, this wouldn't be so much of a problem. (Except that I
usually can't remember people's *names*, much less their titles...)
-b
|
420.17 | "Hello. Dave Wall Speaking..." | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Thu Oct 15 1987 17:10 | 19 |
|
Jeez, it's sort of a mixed bag with me. Medical doctors get called
doctor. The only other people I ever referred to as Doctor were
certain college professors I though were worthy of the title, despite
what their degrees said.
If I'm calling someone on the phone, and they don't identify themselves
on answering, I tend to use whatever name I have for them. The
risk here, of course, is calling someone with a last name like Lee
T's, fracturing it beyond all hope of intelligibility, and embarassing
myself. Oh, well. It's easier than goofing around with a title.
If I use a title with someone I know really well, it is usually
an indicator that I am A) Succembing to some ill-advised urge to
be sarcastic or B) I'm really annoyed with them.
Titles tend to get in the way.
DFW
|
420.18 | | QUARK::KLEINBERGER | This space to change soon | Thu Oct 15 1987 17:40 | 8 |
| I also WANT my kids to call an adult by Mr., Mrs., Miss until they
are told by that adult to do otherwise. That is one way I can teach
them about respect...
Now as to asking the phone at work... I always say "Distribution"....
when I was in MIS, I said "M I S"...
GLK
|
420.19 | You can call me..... | AXEL::FOLEY | This is my impressed look | Thu Oct 15 1987 18:31 | 19 |
|
When the phone is ringing off the hook then I tend to
answer it with "Joe Nemo's.. Foot Long Hot Dogs" or
"Hysteria Central" That tends to get things in the
right perspective.. (ie: Everyone laughing and forgetting the
silly question they called me for to begin with.. :-) :-))
My Dad was Mr. Foley to my friends. My Mom DAMNED well better
be addressed as Mrs. Foley by her childrens friends. Myself,
I like being called "Mike" by people and if they insist on
some level of formality then it's "Mr. Mike". I suppose
when I get older I'll become a clone of my parents and
insist on "Mr. Foley" to children but to everyone else it
should be "Mike" or "Michael" or "Hey Foley!".
Rumour has it that Mr. Topaz has on his Business Card "Mr. Topaz".
mike
|
420.20 | | DDMAIL::ANDREWS | Just living a life of illusion | Thu Oct 15 1987 19:33 | 23 |
| When I was living in South Carolina, the thing to say was:
If a male: Mr. Whatever
A friends Mom: Miss Whatever-her-firstname-is. ie. Miss Pat, Miss
Sue, etc.
An unknown woman was: Mrs. Whatever
I taught kids at a Y for several years and ALL the teachers I worked
with had thier students call them by thier first name, no matter
how old the teacher or the student was. I feel it gave the student
a chance to relax. Who would you do better for, Mr. Andrews you're
teacher or Rob, your friend who was showing you how to do something?
A different subject.
My SO's father is a dentist, so to everyone else (But me) he is
Dr. Sayre. I call him Mr. Sayre. Just because he spent all that
money and time to become a dentist does NOT automatically make him
a better person to me. I would prefer to treat my doctor as a social
equal. He just has a different set of skill than I do. Big Deal,
that's no reason to treat him differently.
When I was at school, all my teachers prefered to be called by thier
first names, doctor or not. I figure the same rule applies as in
paragraph 2.
|
420.21 | | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Oct 15 1987 19:55 | 14 |
| Well before I decided not to continue my education any further,
I once thought it might be kind of neat to be introduced as
Mr. and Dr. xxxxxxxxxxx. In general I address people older than
me by what ever title they are comfortable with, and if professionals
call me by my first name I call them by theirs...
This past weekend I was introduced to all my son's hall mates
at his college parents weekend...my husband and I said they could
call us what they pleased...and they generally avoided calling us
anything directly. :-)
In a way it is a matter of your perspective.
Bonnie
|
420.22 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | Miracle and Magic! | Fri Oct 16 1987 04:32 | 40 |
| Many, many moons ago, the father of an ex-SO went over to a new
neighbor to introduce himself. To his "Hi, I'm Joe Nangle," he
got a "Hi, I'm Mr. Anderson." Though he remained cordial, he
walked away thinking that not only was the man stuck up, but that
he was rude to boot. I would agree.
A fellow third shifter from a few years back told me how he dealt
with getting phone calls during the day when he was, in theory,
asleep. When he answered the phone, if the other person said,
"Hello, Joe?" he'd talk to him. If the other person said, "Hello,
Mr. Healy?" he'd hang up. He figured that anyone that didn't know
him well enough to call him "Joe" wasn't someone he wanted to
talk to.
When dealing with people on a professional basis, I use their
titles, so my doctors I call "Doctor". I also use the honorific
"Mr./Ms." (these are *not "titles") if I don't know the person,
and a title isn't applicable. My elders, such as the parents of
a friend or SO, I refer to with an honorific unless I know them
well or they specifically ask to be called by their first name.
My peers, regardless of age, I will call by their first names.
For myself, I hate being called "Mr. Boyajian" (only partly
because the name gets mangled in the pronunciation). I think of
myself as "Jerry" and prefer others to call me that. As the old
line goes, "Mr. Boyajian is my father; I'm Jerry." I don't mind
when it's the Doctor's secretary calling to confirm an appointment,
or a stranger calling about something, but I'm still uncomfortable
with being referred to as "Mr."
Personally, I was always croggled by people who referred to their
own parents, let alone other people's parents, by first names.
By the way, if the principal/Dr. Jackson situation ever happened
to me, my response to those who corrected me would likely be,
"With all due respect, she can call herself Bozo the Clown for
all I care. Whatever her name and professional title is, her job
title is still Principal, and I came to see the Principal."
--- jerry
|
420.23 | LISTEN AND BE COURTEOUS! | NELSON::DAVAULT | | Fri Oct 16 1987 09:29 | 18 |
| RE: 16
If everybody could allow themselves to be corrected without
getting upset, and would try to remember how others preferred to be
addressed, this wouldn't be so much of a problem. (Except that I
usually can't remember people's *names*, much less their titles...)
I think that the first sentence in the above statement is very important.
In my opinion people should listen to how someone wants to be addressed
and accept it, instead of dwelling on whether that person is being a snob
or picky. When a person tells me he's "Mr. Smith" or Robert, that's
how I address them. I answer my phone and introduce myself as Susan for
one reason only. I like my name and don't particularly care for Sue.
I've had people tell me that I should accept the fact they shorten people's
names. Those are the people I don't answer when they call me Sue.
Susan
|
420.24 | Theres a difference between Mister and mISTer! | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Fri Oct 16 1987 09:33 | 16 |
| re: .0
Actaully, i had the reverse situation happen, where a MR. nobody
insisisted on being called by his first name (because it was
'friendlier', and all the latest managerial books were saying the
'workplace should be a friendly place'). SO I always called him
MISTER nobody, because it served my purpose very well (as I disliked
him IMMENSELY), had virtually NO RESPECT for him, and would have
preferred that he left the company.
I imply my respect or otherwise to a person , not by thier title,
but by HOW i address them. Sorrry, but i can't give any examples
here, because the inflection gets lost.
Bob+3
|
420.25 | I am what I am what I am | MASTER::HARP | | Fri Oct 16 1987 11:59 | 5 |
| You can calls me Brown. You can calls me Tom. You can calls me Dr.
Jackson......Just don't calls me Mr. Johnson....A persons priviledge
I think...
Let me earn your respect!
|
420.26 | DEC is an informal place | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Oct 16 1987 14:13 | 11 |
| I used to work in a group which had several Ph. D.'s (no, not me!
I'm not that much of a scholar) in various disciplines in it, and
it was very much of a first-name sort of a place - except for one
fellow who was extra-proud of himself and wanted to be called "Dr.
<whatsisname>". Very few people ever remembered to call him that
anyhow, since he was doing the same work as the rest of us were,
doctorate or not (if he had been a manager over us or something
we might have felt more natural about referring to him differently
than to his peers). He backed down when he found out that half
of his coworkers also had doctorates and that it didn't matter to
anyone else!
|
420.27 | Mom | BUMBLE::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Fri Oct 16 1987 15:34 | 5 |
| All of my son's friends (ages 16 through 21) call me "Mom" except
for their girlfriends who sometimes call me Mary. I'm not at all
sure how this came about but thats the way it is and I love them
all.
Mary
|
420.28 | Which title to use? | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | | Fri Oct 16 1987 18:48 | 14 |
| I know what you mean about shortening names. I prefer to go either
by Elizabeth (which I do at work), or Betty (with close friends).
I don't like Liz, or Lizzy, but Liz is what I frequently get called
by people who barely know me. I can call someone over the phone,
introduce myself as Elizabeth Younger, and they say "Ok Liz,..."
If they are trying to sell me something, they just lost the sale.
I am a bit uncomfortable being called Miss or Ms Younger, and even
more uncomfortable with Mrs Younger. I'd prefer friends children
just call me Elizabeth or Betty.
Elizabeth
(not Liz)
|
420.29 | still a kid in their eyes | LUDWIG::DAUGHAN | i worry about being neurotic | Fri Oct 16 1987 22:18 | 4 |
| i still call my parents friends mr or mrs
i feel really uncomfortable using their first names.
kelly
|
420.31 | OK, I'll talk about "touchy" | BRONS::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon Oct 19 1987 13:39 | 22 |
| "Touchy", maybe, but I think that she's absolutely right. Any
number of salesmen Have lost their sale right off the bat by
calling me "Jimmy", "Jimbo", or even "Jim" in the wrong tone or
without invitation. There's this notion going around that a
person's name is the most beautiful sound they can hear so you
should use it, or some such. When it is applied by salesmen and
total strangers I feel the use of my name is often misuse.
When a salesman calls me "Jim" without asking he's saying "We're
really just friends--this isn't formal businesss", and that is
just palin false. We're not friends. It is very much business,
and I'll thank him to keep it formal. When he calls me by an
unwanted and childish diminutive that I don't use, he's not
merely saying we're friends, he is treating me in an insulting
manner by suggesting that I'm a child or his inferior.
If Ms. Younger wanted to be called Liz, she'd so introduce
herself. If she says she's Elizabeth Younger, then that's who
she is. No-one else, especially a sales person has the right to
try to define her to suit their needs.
JimB.
|
420.32 | more on first-name finagling | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | enroute to rondo capriccioso | Mon Oct 19 1987 15:18 | 11 |
| I have the same cold reaction when people I don't know who are trying
to sell me something extrapolate from my real first name "Judith" that
I should be called "Judy" (which I personally hate, particularly
because it's been used in this context for so long). Judith is fine,
and if they're product piques my interest, I may ask them to call me
"Jody". After all, my parents came up with "Jody" and then had to find
a real name to go on the books - Josephine was too fancy, but Judith
did just fine.
-Jody
|
420.34 | what is the hidden agenda? | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Mon Oct 19 1987 17:10 | 12 |
| Mike, if a stranger put his arm around you and started calling you
Mikie, would you feel like you wanted to buy from him/her?
I think it is the assumption of the appearances of friendship
when none is there. Having someone act in the intimate fashion
that one expects of close friends as a means to sell cars or something
else would turn me off also. I'd far rather just learn about the
characteristics of what is being sold. The "best friends" routine
would also make me wonder if the salesman is trying to pull a scam
on me.
Bonnie
|
420.35 | Sales - for who's benefit? | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | There are no misteakes | Mon Oct 19 1987 18:27 | 11 |
| Remember, I am doing the *salesman* a favor by buying his product
from him. He is not doing me a favor in selling it. If I really
want the product, I can probably find someone else to sell it to
me - and let have the commission. If the person insults me, I feel
no obligation to give them my buisiness.
This is particularly aggrivating with unsolicited sales pitches
- for example, a telephone solicitor.
Elizabeth
|
420.37 | you can call me...rik...cus that's me. | SKYLIT::SAWYER | hey ma! what's our religion...? | Tue Oct 20 1987 16:53 | 28 |
|
re: 0
i suppose you can guess what's coming.....
I
do not believe in.....
TITLES!
in the context of .0
there is charles and di
there is ron and nancy
there is caspar
and micheal
everything is too pretentious...
and seems to dictate that we act wierd....bow, scrape, grovel...stuff
like that
"yes your most holy wisdomness!"
"thank you your potificated wonderfullness!"
beat me, lord, beat me!"
and it only fuels their already overinflated egos!
and in most cases they are just people who knew how to get power...
but not how to use it wisely for the benefit of the many as opposed
to the comfort of the few.
|