T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
380.1 | Can we say this in a Notesfile these days? | SCRUFF::CONLIFFE | Better living through software | Thu Aug 20 1987 17:06 | 23 |
| |< Note 380.0 by QUARK::LIONEL "We all live in a yellow subroutine" >
| -< A Public Service Announcement >-
|
| Please join me and Digital in supporting public television -
| tune in tomorrow night between 7 and 11PM, call 617-492-1111,
| and make a pledge in any amount. Remember that DEC will match
| your donation if you include a matching gift form with your
| pledge payment. And if you get me on the phone, say "Hi!".
Doesn't this violate the corporate policy on solicitation of employees by
employees? And/or, the policy on the proper use of the E-net?
| P.S. Feel free to forward this to anyone you think may be
| interested.
|
Doesn't this violate the corporate policy on "chain letters"???
But in any case, I'll be there too. I'll be the one answering the phone
"XCON/XSEL Suppor... Ooops, I mean, Channel 2..."
Nigel
|
380.2 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Thu Aug 20 1987 17:14 | 14 |
| I don't think so, especially as this is really DEC soliciting,
not me personally. But I did stop to think about the issue before
I wrote the note. Besides, this event was announced in Digital
This Week and New Hampshire View, so I doubt there's a problem.
And forwarding the note hardly constitutes a "chain letter" in my
opinion.
See you there!
Steve
P.S. Those of you who watch some other PBS station, please
give THEM your support. Thanks.
|
380.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Sat Aug 22 1987 02:10 | 9 |
| I had so much fun I'm going back tomorrow night. Those of you
who looked for me probably couldn't recognize me. I was wearing
the blue "VAX" hat that did a good job of hiding my face from
the cameras. Tomorrow I leave the hat off.
I was disappointed that I didn't hear from anyone I knew, and
I was getting many of the calls (they weren't randomly
distributed).
Steve
|
380.4 | Operators were standing by.... | SCRUFF::CONLIFFE | Better living through software | Mon Aug 24 1987 09:52 | 4 |
| so, was business any better on Saturday night????
Nigel
|
380.5 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Mon Aug 24 1987 10:59 | 4 |
| Indeed it was. On Friday night we raised about $36K, on Saturday
it was over $86K! My ear still hurts....
Steve
|
380.6 | fyi - more info on the pledging | LEZAH::BOBBITT | face piles of trials with smiles | Mon Aug 24 1987 11:22 | 8 |
| fyi, at last glance (11 p.m. Sunday EDT) they still had roughly
700,000 dollars to go....by August 31 (the end of their fiscal year).
Certain donations qualify you for receiving gifts, books, memberships
to Channel 2 (discounts all over Boston). Also, you can pledge
to give monthly.
-Jody
|
380.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Mon Aug 24 1987 11:50 | 29 |
| One thing I should point out specifically about WGBH. Many
people, especially in New Hampshire, say they give only to WENH,
the New Hampshire PBS station (that's if they give at all).
However, WGBH is the MAJOR producer of PBS programming, over a third
of it, and of some of the most popular shows: Masterpiece Theatre,
Nova, The French Chef, The Victory Garden, Mystery, This Old House,
etc. Viewer contributions help pay for producing these programs
- the payments from other PBS stations and grants aren't enough.
One thing I discovered while taking pledges was that the people
responding the most, those who really appreciated WGBH's programming
and the availability of quality television, were those who could
least afford to donate. The elderly on fixed incomes, and other
low income families were donating a much larger percentage of their
income than others. It was those $5 per month donations that really
made me understand what public television means to people.
Eight out of ten people who watch WGBH never contribute. Just
$35 a year makes you a member, with many benefits. Yes, larger
donations entitle you to "thank-you gifts", but I think too many
people get caught up in the notion that they are "buying" these
gifts (some of which, like the "disappearing Tardis mug" are
unavailable elsewhere) rather than helping support public television.
It strikes me as odd that people who think nothing of spending
$150 a year on a single cable channel won't consider offering
even half that amount to a channel they probably watch more often.
Steve
|