T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
346.1 | I am confused | CRAVAX::SECTEMP | | Mon Jul 13 1987 15:30 | 11 |
| I'm not sure I understand your definitions. I have some VERY serious
friendships. Are you applying this to male/female situations only?
I think you can have a relationship with anyone (employee/boss,
etc.) and that does not constitute a friendship, nor does it imply
something of a more serious nature.
Help...explain....
Debra
|
346.2 | | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Mon Jul 13 1987 16:12 | 13 |
| RE .0:
My perception of the difference between a friendship and a relationship
is that a relationship is simply a close friendship with a
sexual-interest element. Everyone whom I've ever been involved
with on that level has also been a close friend - and usually remains
so after the romantic relationship has ended.
I'm assuming you are talking about male-female relationships (or
the equivilent for gays).
Elizabeth
|
346.3 | expectations... | FRSBEE::BEVERIDGE | | Mon Jul 13 1987 17:30 | 19 |
| RE:.2
Something you said is key to what I'm trying to figure out. You
said
>Everyone whom I've ever been involved with on that level has also
>been a close friend - and usually remains so after the romantic
>relationship has ended.
I guess my question is, besides the physical involvement, what changes
in terms of commitment, agreement, etc. in a relationship when you
are actually "going out" with someone instead of seeing them or
just being friends with them. This is something my girlfriend and
I are working out right now, and I was hoping for some guidance
as to expectations of each other, of ourselves, etc.
Scott
|
346.4 | I'm trying to understand the situation | CRAVAX::SECTEMP | Debra Reich | Mon Jul 13 1987 17:46 | 19 |
| Very shaky subject...when dealing with boyfriend/girlfriend situations,
it is usually a continuum of getting closer, not just "ok, we are
having a relationship now" In many cases one person expects a lot
more than another. Should you expect to see each other EVERY weekend?
Should you see only each other and not date other people? Is it
taken for granted that if you want to go out, s/he will go with
you? These are the type of questions I think you may be dealing
with. (of course I could be dead wrong)
In my case, I have "gone out" with some people for a short period
of time and then never seen the other person again, fine. But if
I was really close with the person...a good friend....then we still
see each other. I think if you have a real relationship, you two
can talk about anything, especially the subject of this base note.
I am helping?
Debra
|
346.6 | And you thought it would be easy | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Mon Jul 13 1987 23:23 | 20 |
|
The easiest way I've been able to figure it:
Friendship: enjoying the company of someone else, without
regard to the way they look, act, feel, there's
no expectations.
Relationship: there are certain parameters that vary with
different individuals, appearance, activities,
exclusivity, it means a little more work,
compromise and/or communication, although
communication is important in friendship as
well.
No I guess this doesn't provide an answer either, this is
a tough one.
Mark
|
346.7 | guess I'm behind the times | WEBSTR::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Tue Jul 14 1987 09:37 | 23 |
| I think I'm in trouble. I always thought relationship was the more
general term, used to describe any two or more people who had some
contact or interaction, as in --
the relationship between myself and my boss
the relationship between my mother and my sister-in-law
the relationship among my daughter and all the girls on the gymnastics
team
"In a relationship" sounds only slightly more useful than "I know that
person."
A sexual relationship is just one kind of possible relationship. A
friendship is another kind of relationship, one that can overlap sexual
relationships and committed relationships but doesn't necessarily
include either one.
What you call the relationship between you and a person you care about
isn't as important as what you do about it and how you face the issues
involved in getting any two people to interact with each other
smoothly.
--bonnie
|
346.8 | replies & more Qs | FRSBEE::BEVERIDGE | | Tue Jul 14 1987 10:12 | 67 |
| RE: .4
Yes, the idea of continually getting closer is very true. As far
as I can see when two people stop "getting closer" or growing together,
the relationship goes stagnant. Expectations are more prevelant
in a relationship, as yourself and .6 both said. Correct me if I'm
wrong but I believe that the expectations should be spelled out ahead
of time, if they are not explicitly understood by both parties. Or
are there a "basic" set of ground rules (how often seen, seeing other
people) that are implied by given situations? Combination of both?
Re: .5
You used the phrase, "relating to each other in a meaningful way"
a number of times, and I understand the thought behind it, but does
that mean you relate to plain friends in a "meaningless" way? I
have had some very close friends that I relate to in a very meaningful
way, both male and female, yet I would not say that I am "going
out" with them. Perhaps then we have to question the nature of
a friendship vs. relationship. The sense I get from your note,
especially the last paragraph (In a nutshell...), a relationship
involves commitment, a friendship involves acceptance. One more
thing...
>and whether or not it includes sexual expression also is of no
>concern to anyone.
I may be reading into this, but perhaps we could say that sexual
expression is not a NECESSARY, but OPTIONAL part of a relationship.
Given this, we could say that a relationship exists without sexual
expression, as long as there is acceptance and commitment. But
sexual expression existing without acceptance and commitment is
known generally as cheap sex. Is this, then, a redefinition of
a "best friend", or is that another matter altogether? Is it a
different kind of commitment? Trust? Perhaps this is another HR
topic.
RE: .6
Yes, it is a tough one. You brought up the idea of expectations;
in a relationship there are certain things you expect from each
other - based on the commitments you have made (.5). You are right
in that it takes "a little more work compromise and communication".
As Bob said, "If I am comitted to someone, then that is all there
is to it. If i am not commited, I am my own person, and whatever
I do is my business." I think you both are saying the same thing,
only in different.
There is another common thread between .5 and .6 that I have to
question:
.5 >If I am not comitted, I am my own person, and whatever I do is
>my own business.
.6 >...it means a little more work, compromise and/or communication,
>although communciation is important in friendship as well.
Perhaps I take things too literally, but in neither line (and I
hope I do not use them out fo context) do I hear= that friendship
takes compromise. Is there a balance then between between acceptance
of someone else and compromise in a friendship?
I know I've brought up many more questions. Thank you all for your
input so far. Please keep the ideas coming.
Scott
|
346.9 | What are you driving at? | CRAVAX::SECTEMP | Debra Reich | Tue Jul 14 1987 11:11 | 10 |
| Now I don't know what you are asking. It seems to me that you are
in a relationship, but don't know where you should go from here...are
commitments being brought up? Do you both see the relationship
going in different directions? (ending? continuing on a more "serious
level"?) Why do you feel as though some "contract" of expectations
should be made if you are enjoying yourselves? If you can talk
about how you feel, I don't think anyone will get hurt.
Debra
|
346.10 | Like & love? | FRSBEE::BEVERIDGE | | Tue Jul 14 1987 11:41 | 14 |
| RE: .9
Perhaps you've hit something there Deb. I guess she has a different
set of expectations in a "relationship" than I do. I think you
may have found an answer in when you said, "If you can talk about how
you feel, I don't think anyone will get hurt". Someone could get hurt
if one person wants more than the other is willing to give, but
part of caring and being selfless, I have found, is giving in to
other a little (compromise).
Maybe the easiest definition between friendship & relationship =
like & love.
SB
|
346.11 | Thoughts on the topic. | SQM::AITEL | Helllllllp Mr. Wizard! | Tue Jul 14 1987 12:22 | 41 |
| I don't think it's as easy as saying friendship=like and
relationship=love. If you want dictionary definitions, you
won't get much further. A friend is defined as someone
you "know, like and trust." A relation is defined as both
"kinship, by blood or marriage" and a "connection" such as
a business or diplomatic connection.
So, friendship has no *legal* implications - it's by your
choice and continues by your choice. It includes trust
and seems to imply a long-term interactive activity.
Relationship has legal implications (marriage or blood ties,
or business or diplomatic connections) and *there's no inclusion
of trust or knowledge of one another*.
We tend to use "relationship" more loosely nowadays. Perhaps it
is because people of "high moral standards" now more frequently
live with each other and/or go further in "friendship" without
getting into a legal "relationship". We still have the feelings and
desire for the security of the legalities, but we don't want the
binding of the legalities on the friendship. I don't know if it'll
work - it's a harder path methinks, since there are no bounderies
to it. It relies knowing each other (continuing to communicate),
liking each other (continuing to like each other as we grow and
change) and mostly on TRUST. Although marriage relies on these
things also, there's also the fact of the marriage, in all its
legal, social and religious garb, to bind the relationship together
during hard times - sometimes for good, sometimes for bad. There
is no legal and social framework to lean on during the hard times
with a friend-relationship-whatever. We don't even have a good
word to describe it!
I think the purpose is, to many of us, not to "ruin" the friendship
with legal bindings - to keep the sense of being together from choice
and not because we think we have to. For others of us, it's a result
of a failed legal relationship leaving bad memories of what the
legal system can do to smash the last remaining fragments of the
friendship, once the main portion was gone. Once burnt (by the
legalities) twice shy.
--Louise
|
346.12 | | ERIS::CALLAS | CO in the war between the sexes | Tue Jul 14 1987 13:15 | 16 |
| I'm afraid I'm with Bonnie and Debra; relationship is the broader term.
Having someone as your friend is a relationship, as is having them as
your lover or supervisor. All of these are distinct, none implies any
of the others.
Having been picky about terminology, I'll try to answer your question.
It's really something that you have to work out with your girlfriend.
Both of you should decide where you want your relationship to go. Then
you should talk about it. You don't have to make it a five-year plan.
If you don't know, that's fine. If you don't care, that's fine. As long
as you are honest with yourself, you'll be okay. If you can manage to
be honest with your girlfriend, that's even better (� :-). What you
need to do is to establish groundrules.
Jon
|
346.13 | Argumentive attitude spoil it for everyone. | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_hiker | Tue Jul 14 1987 13:46 | 16 |
| RE: .8, RE: .5
If you want to pick nits, you can pick them all day. The only
diffeerence between a "relatioinship" and a "friendship" is how
you personally define the differences.
I took particular notice of your "argumentive" attitude when you
surmised that we might "relate to friends in a meaningless way",
if we relate in "relationships in a meaningful way".
You seemd to ignore (for your own purpose) my comments about
"relating to friends, and choosing friends for a relationship".
.bob.
|
346.14 | Who Says T.V. is Not Edifying | FDCV03::ROSS | | Wed Jul 15 1987 10:16 | 12 |
| A definition of a "Relationship", as heard on last night's
episode of *Moonlighting*:
"A Relationship is when two people spend a lot of
time together, waiting for something (or someone)
better to happen".
Cute, cynical, ........perhaps all too true????
Alan
|