T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
320.1 | | CSSE::MARGE | Eat dessert first;life is uncertain. | Fri Jun 12 1987 07:56 | 13 |
| > What did your parents teach you?
Funny incident, Gale... my parents were pretty typical, I think...
hold hands crossing the street, look both ways... don't accept any
rides or candy from strangers, that sort of thing.
One day I was walking up to the grocery store and a man pulled up
to the curbing in his car and offered me a ride. Eyes straight
ahead, I declined in a firm voice. Our parish priest later called
my parents to congratulate them on the thoroughness of their training!
grins,
Marge
|
320.2 | | CSSE::MARGE | Eat dessert first;life is uncertain. | Fri Jun 12 1987 08:12 | 20 |
| I don't know if it's my age showing or what, but I do get a bit
irate at parents who let their kids...young kids! not teens...
take off running from their cars in the parking lot to the store.
As for protecting myself, I think it's just generally a matter of
good common sense... I lock my car doors when I'm driving in
unfamiliar areas... and use a light timer at home. I don't personally
have a gun at home but if I were living in a high-crime area, I
would consider it coupled with the proper training to use it.
And if I were home enough to care for it properly, I would have a dog.
My sister lives in the city and wears a police whistle on a chain
around her neck when she goes out on the street. They have organized
"neighborhood watches".
For me, the key is to use common sense but not to get paranoid.
Marge
|
320.3 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee | Fri Jun 12 1987 08:17 | 8 |
| re .0:
> Please, if you can't give a seriouos answer, then see the 'fraidy cat
> note.... and place your non-serious answer there if you must....
You think I wasn't serious?
- M
|
320.4 | | BEES::PARE | | Fri Jun 12 1987 11:56 | 14 |
| When I got divorced, my boys were 6 and 7 years old. I bought a
house across the street from school to eliminate the whole bus/walking
home_problem_possibilities. My mother lived around the corner in
case of accident/illness and they stayed with her when they were
little until I got home. As they got older they wanted to stay
at home and just call Gram if there was a problem so we got a big
dog. Several times strange men (meter readers and such) came to
the door when the boys were alone and refused to enter the house
because they were afraid of the dog. Our Pooh-Bear died two winters
ago and now we have another big dog, a neufoundland named Max.
My sixteen year old takes Max everywhere he goes and more than once
Max's presence has been a God-send for him. Dogs are'nt man's best
friend you know....they are woman's best friend_:-) You are never
really alone when you have a dog in the house and dogs are so wonderful.
|
320.5 | What I learned was determination | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Fri Jun 12 1987 13:41 | 34 |
| I grew up in a house that not only wasn't ever locked, but
couldn't be. Most of the windows had no latches. Several of the
outside doors had no locks beyond possibly a small hook and eye.
The bulkhead had not lock. I was told to not talk to strangers
nor to take rides. I walked everywhere fron the fourth grade on,
and was a good enough walker (by high school I sustained 6 MPH)
and enjoyed it enough that I never really wanted to take rides
even from friends and acquaintence. From the age of 12 I was
allowed to go to Boston on my own.
I guess what I learned was self sufficiency, confidence and
independence. I dealt with my problems, I took my licks, and I
seldom relied on others for protection. Not that my parents
wouldn't come to my aid, but I prefered to handle my troubles
myself.
When I was 12 I was attacked by a bunch of kids one of whom
threatened me with a knife. I broke free and ran like Hell
(through the woods where no-one could keep up with me). I told
my folks, but refused to identify who the kid with the knife
was. They, the police or the school figured out who it was and
the two of us were called to the principles office. I still
refused to confirm who it was. Afterwards I told him that it was
not from fear of him, just that I don't like others to fight for
me. He never bothered me again. The incident was the end of a
long episode of being beaten on a regular basis.
I've never been very proficient with weapons or with my fists,
although I am better than average in many such skills. I just
have a determination that has seen me through a lot of scraps. I
may run, but I don't quit or back down. The attitude has worked
for me, but I don't claim it will work for all.
JimB.
|
320.6 | Do what you can | VICKI::BULLOCK | Living the good life | Fri Jun 12 1987 14:59 | 37 |
| Yes, use common sense most of all.
I do advocate learning karate, or one of the martial arts--just
knowing it gives you a lot of self confidence. It is especially
good for children to learn, too. Nothing, unfortunately, can totally
prevent kidnapping, but knowing how to defend themselves will greatly
help your children's chances.
As for break-ins, I am paranoid about them, too. Having your home
broken into is one of the scariest and most demoralizing things
that can happen to you. Just get good locks for doors and windows
(I like the 2-piece window locks that prevent the window from being
opened from the outside more than 3 inches), use timers on your
lights (and change the times occasionally), and get to know your
neighbors (best of all). Get so that you watch each others' houses
and report anything suspicious immediately. Again unfortunately,
if a real pro wants to get into your house, he can do it. But for
the most part, people like us (average income, etc.) are not usually
targets for "big-time" guys. You want to protect your home from
kids with time on their hands, and usually you can do it. In
decorating your home, try not to have items of obvious value--TV,
stereo, VCR, jewelry, etc. visible from the windows.
Try not to get into the state of mind where you are constantly
fearful of these things happening. All you can do is take the best
precautions you can, pray, and use your head. I know that after
our home was broken into (again, by kids) I went thru a stage where
I hid things, I bought new locks, I set "traps" around the house
(remember the "Vigilante" movies??), etc. After a time I realized
that all I was doing was reacting to what happened, and acting on
my anger and outrage.
So do what you can, and LET IT GO. Try to live positively.
Good luck,
Jane
|
320.7 | don't let fear run your life, or you will live a life of fear | YODA::BARANSKI | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler?! | Fri Jun 12 1987 16:13 | 23 |
| RE: Protecting one's self, etc...
I am against protectionism for it's own sake... What I mean is that if you're
afraid to do something you want to do, like walk around your city/town after
dark; then you're being afraid; you're not protecting yourself if you let your
fear keep you from going for a walk...
I always went a lot of places myself, even when I was young, even when they were
not the best parts of town; I never had any problem. Partly because I was not
afraid... Yes, I occasionally had goose pimples, but I was determined not to
let my fear, or anybody else stop me from living a free live doing what I wanted
to do.
Locks, alarms they are good in their places. Precautions are good in their
place. I never 'went for a ride in a stranger's car', but I've gone hitch
hiking 500 miles... I met the oddest people doing that, many of whom you might
have been afraid to pick up a hitchhiker; an elderly couple, women, a slaesman
with expensive samples... But they were not afriad to help someone out,
give them a ride...
more later...
Jim.
|
320.9 | Common Sense is the Best Defense | THE780::WOODWARD | Seeking the light... | Fri Jun 12 1987 23:20 | 35 |
|
Common sense is *always* the best defense, along with keeping
your wits about you.
I used to work with my Tae Kwon Do instructor in teaching a
women's self-defense class. In the ten weeks of the course
we couldn't teach them much, but we could make them aware of
their surroundings. The object wasn't to scare them into
"reality", but to give them tools that they could use to make
their lives safer and themselves more confident. By teaching
"threat avoidance" we taught them how not to be at the mercy
of their environment. You teach children the same way.
Carrying a police whistle is a great idea. It's sound carries
a lot further than a shout. Sometimes, when a person is afraid,
they can't scream.
Your number one priority when faced with a life threatening
situation is get away from there. Remove the threat by removing
yourself from the situation. Do ANYTHING that you need to do...
RE: weapons -- Weapons are a last resort, and for EXPERTS ONLY!
I have taught quite a few people how to shoot a shotgun till *I*
considered them "experts" in safety, but using a weapon during a
crises is totally different from shooting skeet. Still, you can
argue that as a last resort, to save the lives of those dearest
to you (including yourself) it may be the only way. In actuality,
you usually have many other options that I consider more valid.
It takes a lot of time to become proficient with a handgun, and
too many people do not develop the necessary skills to responsibly
handle them.
I'm sure that there are a lot of ideas out there on how to make
your home more secure...
|
320.10 | A few thoughs on deterring Burglars | RTOADA::LANE | Two Macaws on each Shoulder | Sat Jun 13 1987 13:00 | 24 |
| 1. if you are in your home and you suspect that someone has broken in
to rob you of all your worldly goods, DO NOT turn on the lights, but
try to frighten them into running away, in the dark by making a loud
noise or something - the logic of this is simple: you know your way
around your house, pretty well, but he (she?) does not...
2. also try to arange things a bit so someone breaking in will trip
over something and get scared and run away...
3. Blinds and double glazing that lock are big deterants...
4. Paint "SUPA-ALARM-INC." on a reasonable sized biscuit tin, paint
the whole thing bright red, and mount it on the wall real high on
your house - looks like a burglar alarm!
5. Put up a sign "Beware of the Dog" (especially if you have a dog,
even if it is a peeke!)
6. Don't leave attractive items, Cameras, VCRs, Stereo etc., where
they can be easily seen from outside...
Hope this helps,
Andy.
|
320.11 | Run like Hell! | ARMORY::MIKELISJ | Just browsing through time... | Mon Jun 15 1987 12:05 | 16 |
|
Several years ago i was wandering around alone in Mexico City at night.
Well, i was approached by these two 'gentlemen' who had a great desire
to obtain money without earning it. As soon as i saw them coming toward
me i knew i was in for a tense situation. They just wouldn't believe
that i didn't have any money on me (actually i had most of it in American
Express traveller's cheques). After a brief exchange of words, the big
guy started to get physical, and i decided it was time for an exit,
stage-left so i hi-tailed it out of there as fast as i could! My feet were
moving so quickly, they couldn't of caught me if they tried.
I think that the best advice when confronted with danger is to run.
I'd do it even if i knew one of the many forms of martial arts. It just
isn't worth sticking around. It could be very hazardess to your health.
-jim-
|
320.12 | No Violence, Thanks | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Mon Jun 15 1987 20:00 | 16 |
| My solution: run or hide. If confronted, try to minimize getting
hurt (like, don't provoke an attack).
Non-solution: guns, martial arts, knives, kicking, punching, etc.
Doesn't fit my morals, and yes, I'd rather get [beat up, knived,
raped, stolen from, whatever] than use violence. I am however,
quite young, and having children to care for would make this difficult
to swallow.
My experience thus far has been that you can get out of anything
by avoiding it, talking/crying your way out of it, running, etc.
If someone is hell-bent to maim you, they will do so anyway, and
I am certain I could not live knowing I had maimed another human
being [albeit a lowly sort of human being].
Lee
|
320.13 | I agree... RUN!! | THE780::WOODWARD | Seeking the light... | Mon Jun 15 1987 20:03 | 12 |
|
>I think that the best advice when confronted with danger is to run.
>I'd do it even if i knew one of the many forms of martial arts. It just
>isn't worth sticking around. It could be very hazardess to your health.
I agree, and my earlier entry wasn't meant to suggest a
confrontation... (just in case I was misunderstood...)
Get out of the situation!!
-- Mike
|
320.14 | according to a news spot on the radio | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 16 1987 10:47 | 7 |
| Scream "FIRE!"
People tend to come running -- I guess because they want to watch
-- and it's the thing most likely to scare the burglar or mugger
since he or she knows that people are going to come running.
--bonnie
|
320.15 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Tue Jun 16 1987 11:10 | 64 |
| re .0
� How do you (we) protect outselves in this society? I know there
� are Karate lessens one can take - but that is not an immed cure
� (like if something were to happen tonight), there are guns, but
� I am against them, mace possibly?
The best solution is to learn to anticipate and avoid the danger. At
the DECUS held in Dallas I walked 8 miles in the gathering darkness
through what I was later told was the Dallas version of the Combat
Zone, where muggings and mayhem occurred nightly. I walk aware: keep
away from walls, observe everything around me, and treat every body
I meet as a potential threat (sorry folks: that's how I was trained)
- if anybody gets near my threat zone I prepare to flee or fight depending
on circumstances. Fact is if you don't look like a victim they usually
go look for somebody else.
I don't recomend Karate or any other sport lessons: these are just
that - sports. They are next to useless in a street fight. (And yes
I am a black belt in several Japanese/Korean martial arts)
I don't recomend a gun unless you can draw and fire to kill in less
than 1 second at the absolute most, are capable of hitting a man sized
target at 5' under stress with at least 90% of shots in the kill zone.
I can do that, if you can't don't carry a gun.
I don't recomend any non-lethal disabling device: even if stone cold
sober and not on drugs a bad guy can often take it off you and use
it against you. It is VERY hard to stop somebody on PCP or some other
street drugs.
The basic rule if you are going to fight is YOU HAVE TO BE PREPARED
TO KILL BEFORE THEY GET A CHANCE TO KILL YOU. If this is impossible
for you then practice avoidance techniques.
� Or how does one act if in a post office and a man/woman comes in
� deemed to kill everyone in the post-office?
Very carefully. Don't annoy them, and whatever you do don't do anything
to lower their self esteem or give them the impression that their
situation is impossible. If they lose hope they may just blow away
the hostages and then suicide.
Re .12
(And anybody else who can't/won't fight) - I offer two scenarios.
i) you are walking along avoiding trouble and you see/hear two punks
in a side alley raping a woman. What do you do. To make this harder
for you it is late at night, it is a deserted business district and
everywhere is closed. There are no phone boxes to call the police.
ii) the "Coward of the County" syndrome - you are a peace loving
individual determined to avoid trouble and out for a meal with your
SO. You encounter a group of punks who know you always refuse to fight,
and so avoid trouble and they push you aside and begin to
physically/sexually molest your SO (You may substitute "child" for
SO if you wish).
Before you suggest these are unlikely scenarios I wish to point out
that I have experienced both.
/. Ian .\
|
320.16 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Tue Jun 16 1987 11:46 | 19 |
|
I have received mail from a fellow noter, and would like to add a post
script to .15
In making my final remarks a reference to .12, I did not mean to attack
the views expressed there. In fact I highly admire the strength of
character of one who can turn the other cheek.
Rather my scenarios were *prompted* by .12, for as .12 describes the
response to a personal threat I wonder about the response of many to
a third party threat. In general I wonder whether what is seen as strength
of character when the threat is directed at yourself, becomes like the
actions of the passers by in the Parable of the Good Samaritan when
the threat is directed at another.
So again I meant nothing personal to the author of .12 - rather I just
wanted to offer a different type of threat for consideration.
/. Ian .\
|
320.17 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee | Tue Jun 16 1987 11:48 | 16 |
| re .12:
> If someone is hell-bent to maim you, they will do so anyway, and I am
> certain I could not live knowing I had maimed another human being
> [albeit a lowly sort of human being].
I guess if this attitude gets you killed the only difference is
that you don't have to live with the fact that your decision got
a human being maimed (yourself).
If you won't do what it takes to survive, how is your concern for life
(the basis of your "no violence!" stand) any greater than that of your
attackers?
- M
|
320.18 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Tue Jun 16 1987 12:35 | 21 |
| For those within striking distance of Spit Brook (Nashua, NH) the following
appeared in Live Wire
# # # FILM # # # FILM # # # FILM # # # FILM # # # FILM # # #
"Lady Beware" Film
WHEN: Wednesday
June 17th
WHERE: Mauchly/Eckert Conf. Rm. (ZKO1-3)
TO BE SHOWN: 12 Noon and again at 12:30
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
How can a woman protect herself if she wakes at night to find an
intruder in her house? If she is forced off the road by another motorist?
If she is walking through an unfamiliar area at night and senses that she is
being followed?
|
320.19 | the situation varies; it's your choice | PHENIX::INTRO5 | 1's & 0's, what could be simpler?! | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:07 | 13 |
| RE: .*
Sometimes it is best to run, When you can't take the danger, or nothing would be
served by staying.
Sometimes it is best to turn the other cheek, When you can ...
Sometimes you have to have to standup and fight, or you will spend the rest
of your life dodging threats, and what kind of life is that? You have to
stand up for what is right, or *you* become part of the problem!
Jim.
|
320.20 | what you carry in your head is most important | THE780::WOODWARD | Seeking the light... | Wed Jun 17 1987 01:49 | 55 |
| You have some great ideas, Ian. Just a couple of comments.
> I walk aware: keep
> away from walls, observe everything around me, and treat every body
> I meet as a potential threat (sorry folks: that's how I was trained)
> - if anybody gets near my threat zone I prepare to flee or fight depending
> on circumstances. Fact is if you don't look like a victim they usually
> go look for somebody else.
Great technique!! It works... muggers want an easy mark.
> I don't recomend Karate or any other sport lessons: these are just
> that - sports. They are next to useless in a street fight. (And yes
> I am a black belt in several Japanese/Korean martial arts)
That's a very good point... Karate can turn you into a "dojo ballerina"
if it's not taught and practiced with self-defense in mind.
It's difficult to pick a school that will teach practical self-defense,
and a street fight is not the place to find out your training was lacking.
They should also teach you how to use things that you normally carry with
you as weapons to assist in breaking away from an attacker.
> I don't recomend a gun unless you can draw and fire to kill in less
> than 1 second at the absolute most, are capable of hitting a man sized
> target at 5' under stress with at least 90% of shots in the kill zone.
> I can do that, if you can't don't carry a gun.
I can (I practice a lot), but I still won't carry one off my property...
usually... :-)
> I don't recomend any non-lethal disabling device: even if stone cold
> sober and not on drugs a bad guy can often take it off you and use
> it against you. It is VERY hard to stop somebody on PCP or some other
> street drugs.
Almost impossible to stop someone on PCP or speed without putting him in
the hospital... even then he probably won't realize that you've seriously
hurt him until his "high" is over.
I don't like mace or any of those other varieties of sprays. Not only can
it be used against you, what if the wind is in your face while you are
spraying?
If you know what you're doing, a walking stick or umbrella can be very
useful for helping get you out of the danger area. A 'rat tail' brush
or comb can be a nasty surprise if you're grabbed... just don't try the
"keys between the fingers while punching" trick. You have a good chance
of breaking your fingers and/or losing your keys and you need them to get
into your house/car. High healed shoes make good weapons... just remember
the point is to get out of the area by breaking away and getting away.
-- Mike
|
320.21 | that other cheek... | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Wed Jun 17 1987 01:52 | 23 |
| re .16 3rd party
Yup, that is the hardest question. I've never been in the first, so i
don't know what I would do. Second is easy: tell the bartender/
whoever you'll sue the pants off them, they'll stop it. Failing that,
nasty comments about the masculinity of any man who can't find a
willing slut [i hate that word, but when talking to apes...] to prove
themselves with, etc, etc. That has worked with every english/american
speaker I have used it on, seems to turn 'em into spaghetti, yelling,
but unable to rape. When hit [or witness to someone being hit], you
say "oh boy it takes a *real*man* to beat a woman, doesn't it." Once
again, that is very effective with english speakers. It has failed
on me twice, and both were in France with francophones. Words are
a very powerful weapon, I find. My problem is to keep from using
them to provoke someone into hitting me when he [never she] is yelling
at me.
Re. .17
Are you serious? My body is mine with which to do as I choose.
Lee
|
320.22 | are there higher priorities then life? | PHENIX::INTRO5 | MAIL hates my NOTES name | Wed Jun 17 1987 12:07 | 6 |
| RE: .21 RE .17
Seriously, you must have a higher priority on something other then 'life'
to allow yourself to be maimed or killed... nonviolence???
Jim YODA::BARANSKI
|
320.23 | Fight or flight? ... I'll take flight | PDVAX::P_DAVIS | Peter Davis (aka SARAH::P_DAVIS) | Wed Jun 17 1987 15:31 | 14 |
| I agree with the opinions expressed in other replies that you should
at ALL costs avoid a fight. That means staying away from dangerous
or potentially dangerous places, handing over your wallet when
threatened, etc. There is simply no way of knowing how lethal someone
can become, and whoever is threatening you is probably a good deal
more panicky and desperate than you are.
In situations where you can't avoid physical combat, there are some
defensive techniques you should know, and they have nothing whatsoever
to do with karate or any other martial "art." There's a book called
something like MUGGING: YOU CAN PROTECT YOURSELF which describes
many of these techniques. I don't remember the author's name, but
I think he is a detective on some police force. I'll find out and
enter the info here.
|
320.24 | take my wallet, please - take my wife? DIE! | ARCHER::FOX | | Wed Jun 17 1987 16:56 | 19 |
| Avoidance is my choice also, not to the point where my life has
to be altered because I may enter a dangerous situation. I go
about my business, if something bad happens and I can get out of
it w/o myself or anyone I'm with getting hurt, that's my choice.
However, if I feel that my life, or especially those of my
wife or childs' is threatened, I would not hesitate in stopping
the person responsible by whatever means available.
To help avoid things like that from happening, we organized a
Neighborhood Watch program in our area which apparently has worked.
In the 2 years since it started, no criminal activity has occured
in the area. As an added benefit, we all became a little closer
and watch out for each other. I highly recommend it. We also have
a dog, a 100 pound black lab (OK, he's a bit overweight) who strikes
fear into everyone (including me sometimes) who approaches the house.
Any little noise outside, esp. at night, draws a series of growls
and barks that is music to my ears, but the last thing a burglar
wants to hear!
John
|
320.25 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee | Thu Jun 18 1987 11:25 | 14 |
| re .21 [ re .17]:
> Are you serious?
Yes.
> My body is mine with which to do as I choose.
Fine, but how can you claim to be any more moral than someone out to
kill you??
- M
|
320.26 | | ERIS::CALLAS | I have nothing to say, but it's okay | Thu Jun 18 1987 12:22 | 9 |
| re .25:
Ms. Tatistcheff's response is more moral that her hypothetical
attacker's for one simple reason: her behavior is her decision to do
what she wants with her person and her life, while her attacker's
behavior is its decision to do what it wants with someone else's person
and someone else's life.
Jon
|
320.27 | On burglary | BEES::PARE | | Thu Jun 18 1987 15:34 | 26 |
| I know a (former) professional burgler who told me the following:
1. The legal penalty for Breaking and Entering In the Nightime is
greater than for B&E during the daytime so most professionals do not
break into your home at night. This means that if you wake up to
find someone in your home you may be dealing with a rapist, a drug
addict or a looney (someone who is there for a violent reason) and
not just a burgler.
2. The professional burgler does it for money and avoids a
confrontation at all costs, at the first sign of noise or activity
indicating that someone is in the house he will leave quietly.
This means that if you are home sick and hear a noise in the house
turn on a radio or cough, give him a chance to run and he probably
will leave without anyone getting hurt.
3. If you have a dog he will most likely go next door where they
do not have a dog. Professionals frequently go through a whole
neighborhood and won't take the time to bother with a house that
has a dog. If your house is robbed and you DO have a dog it has
most likely been robbed by someone you know.
Not much help perhaps but I've found that it is sometimes usefull to
know what kind of a situation you are dealing with when difficulties
arise.
Mary
|
320.28 | | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at Large | Thu Jun 18 1987 16:57 | 16 |
| I was taught that if someone was going to hurt me, and I could
not get away, that there was nothing that was unfair of me to
do to protect myself. Knowing that I would use any means needed
to protect myself dissuaded several bullies from picking on me
as a child.
As for the idea of submitting to a beating (or killing etc) rather
then use violence to protect myself, well, I have a hard time with
that. It seems that the decision one is making is that the attackers
life and/or physical well being is more important then ones own.
It is equivalent to saying that the attacker is a better person,
more deserving of remaining whole then the victim. Much as I'd hate
to hurt or kill another, I'd rather do that then be hurt or killed
myself. I have people who'd miss me a great deal if I were not around.
Alfred
|
320.29 | curious | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | | Fri Jun 19 1987 06:47 | 4 |
| re .27 So, what's the ratio of 'professional' burglars
to 'amateurs' ? This seems like an important question ?
Which is more likely to break in at night - a rapist or
an 'amateur' burglar ? Some statistics, please ?
|
320.30 | | SPIDER::PARE | | Fri Jun 19 1987 10:10 | 18 |
| >>So, what's the ratio of 'professional' burglars to 'amateurs'?
>>This seems like an important question?
>>Which is more likely to break in at night - a rapist or an
>>'amateur' burglar? Some statistics, please?
Most of the 'amateur burglars' I've had any experience knowing were
young, (out-of-work or perhaps dropped-out-of-school) and tended to
restrict their activities to the day time too. In legal terms
breaking and entering during the nighttime carries a longer jail
sentence because it assumes that there was some intent or possibility
of bodily harm to the owner/occupant.
I don't know what the ratio is and (do be honest with you) compiling
statistics for a conversation in a notesfile is (frankly)
amount_of_work_exceeds_level_of_interest_;-) Don't want to upset
anyone but, in my OPINION, anyone who breaks into your home
during the night is dangerous and confrontation should be avoided
if possible. Please note that this is just an opinion.
|
320.31 | daytime ghost towns | NACHO::HOWER | Life is like an onion | Fri Jun 19 1987 11:52 | 6 |
| The trend toward daytime breakins-to-burglarize may also be increasing
since, in many neighborhoods, there simply AREN'T many people home
during the weekday (like most of us reading this :-).
Why bother with nighttime when you've got the whole working day?
-hh
|
320.33 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Fri Jun 19 1987 20:42 | 7 |
| It is open season if they are in my house. I take someone coming
into my house without my consent as a personal violation.
I plan to deal with the situation by comunicating my feelings
to the violator in a clear 12ga manner.
-j
|
320.34 | | PRANCR::AIKALA | Orchestral Manuevers in the Dark | Sat Jun 20 1987 05:49 | 5 |
| re: .33 - besides, Jerry, we have the "Make My Day" provision here
in Colorado Springs, which kinda makes 'em think twice
before being naughty instead of nice.
Sherm
|
320.36 | "Make My Day" in Massachusetts... | ANYWAY::GORDON | Make me an offer... | Mon Jun 22 1987 09:46 | 6 |
| Some time ago, I remember the Massachusetts Legislature passing
a law permitting the use of deadly force in protection of your
property. It may have since been repealed, but I know it was on
the books for a while...
--Doug
|
320.37 | re .35 "what deadly weapon ?" | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Mon Jun 22 1987 13:22 | 15 |
| re .35 '...not brandishing a weapon...'
I'll bet I can do more 'deadly' damage to your body before you
even realize it was planned, _without_ brandishing a 'deadly'
than you can shake a pacific principle at ( ;})
A clearly defined "deadly" weapon is not a requirement to inflict
"grievous bodily harm". One reason professional boxers cannot fight
on the street, and some municipalities "register" karate blackbelts.
It does not even take special training; practice _does_ help, but
it's not necessary. An assailant, especially in the night, may
simply overpower you and proceed to pommel you to pulp.
Dwight
|
320.38 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Mon Jun 22 1987 21:33 | 19 |
| re.35
Yes, It did allow almost exactly that! It has since been changed
to remove some of the grey areas. You are still within your rights
to "blow away" an attacker. This law has been tested a few times
but to answer questions, NO it has not lead to Mass killings.
To my knowledge no one has been prosicuted for defending.
I belive the fact that Colorado is not overlawed and allows
ownership of guns DOES make most criminals think twice since
many homes are "armed". I have heard estimates that as high
as 43% are gun owners.
I think It is the second best law in the country the first best
being the twon that REQUIRES all homes to be armed.
-j
|
320.39 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee | Mon Jun 22 1987 22:52 | 6 |
| re: last few
Don't you guys know this is the "I'm more liberal than you are"
conference- you can't talk about shooting people!!!!! :-)
- M
|
320.40 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Tue Jun 23 1987 00:40 | 5 |
| Re: .39
That's tellin 'em, Mike. In this conference, we HUG people to
death! :-)
Steve
|
320.41 | | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | | Tue Jun 23 1987 06:36 | 1 |
| Bah humbug ! We just hug 'em 'til they puke. :-)
|
320.42 | MY EXPERIANCES | PRANCR::PAPA | | Wed Jun 24 1987 19:17 | 31 |
| I HAVE 4 CHILDREN 2 BOYS AGE 6 AND 9. TWO GIRLS AGE 20 AND 27.
THEY HAVE ALL BEEN TAUGHT THAT NO ONE HAS ANY RIGHT TO BOTHER
THEM IN ANY WAY AND THEY ARE TO USE THE HIGHST LEVEL OF FORCE AVAILABLE
TO TERMINATE AN ATTACK AND THEY SHOULD NOT FEEL THE ANY REMORSE
FOR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO THEIR ATTACKER.
MY 20 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER HAS BEEN ATTACKED TWICE IN ATTEMPTED RAPE
SITUTIONS ONCE AT AGE 11 AND ONCE AT AGE 20 IN BOTH CASES SHE
SUCESSFULLY DEFENDED HERSELF AND SHE HERSELF WAS NOT HARMED ASIDE
FROM TORN CLOTHS IN EITHER INCIDENT HER ATTACKERS COULDENT HANDEL
HER RESPONSE AND WERE DAMAGED CONSIDERABLY.
MY 27 YEAR OLD WAS ATTACKED WHEN SHE WAS 20. SHE WAS HIT IN THE
FACE BY SUPRISE BY SOMEBODIES FIST. SHE BEAT OFF HER ATTACKER
SUCESSFULLY. SHE SUFFERED SOME NERVE DAMAGE ON HER FACE WE DONT
KNOW HOW BADELY SHE DAMAGED HER ATTACKER. I THINK FROM THESE
EXPERIENCES THAT THE KEY IS IN MENTAL ATTITUDE ABOUT SELF DEFENCE.
AND THE WILLINGNESS TO DEFEND YOURSELF WITHOUT WORRY ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU
DAMAGE YOUR ATTACKER. IN BOTH CASES THEY USED PURSES FEET AND
FINGERNALES TO BEAT THEIR ATTACKERS, GOING FOR THE EYES AND FACE
WITH FINGERNALES AND THE APPROATE PLACE WITH THEIR FEET.
I HAVE RECIENTLY TRAINED THEM (DAUGHTERS) IN THE PROPER USE OF
ELECTRONIC STUN GUNS AND THEY CARRY THEM ALL THE TIME NOW.
ALL MY KIDS HAVE RECIEVED EXTENSIVE TRAINING IN THE USE OF A WIDE
VARITY OF HANDGUNS FROM AGE 3. AND ALL ARE RESPECTIBLE SHOTS. ALTHOUGH
I DONT RECOMMEND TO THEM THAT THEY USE A HANDGUN FOR SELF DEFENSE
IN THE HOUSE. FOR THE HOUSE A TWENTY GAUGE SHOTGUN IS PROPER.
THIS ALL MAY SOUND ROUGH BUT SELF DEFENSE IS NO GAME. THEIR IS NO
EASY CLEAN WAY TO DEFEND YOURSELF. SELF DEFENCE IS A DIRTY GAME.
MY DAUGHTERS ARE VERY GRATEFUL FOR THE TRAINING THEY RECIEVED AND
I PITY ANYONE WHO GOES AFTER THEM THEY HAVE LEARNED FROM THEIR PAST
EXPIERANCES AND ARE FAR BETTER ABLE AND WILLING TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.
|