T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
292.1 | YES | TRCA03::TIPPER | Kenneth (Sandy) Tipper, Toronto | Thu Apr 23 1987 11:29 | 36 |
| > The question is ...
>
> How do you kiss ?? and what kind of kiss do you like to receive
> in return between friends/SO's etc. ??
> Suction strong enough to pull out a set of dentures !! :-).
OK, when in passion, but I have broken a blood vessel in my tongue
this way, and so I am a bit cautious.
> Wet and sloppy.
OK, again when in passion. Especially great when not on the lips.
> 'French Kissing'.
WONDERFUL, not only when in passion, but only with my SO.
> Chaste and Dry.
Beautiful. A great way to show affection, with anyone for whom
it would not be misunderstood. With my SO, indicates "I love you,
and that's not just because of the great sex."
> On both cheecks ( upper ones of course !! ) ;-).
With any other than my SO, perhaps a bit too formal, but if that
is how they feel comfortable, equivalent to "chaste and dry", above.
With my SO, why the "of course" clause??? ;{)
> On the hand.
Formal, but a bit on the elegant side, seems to make the other feel
a bit special if they are not used to it, else it has little meaning
for me.
> etc.
YES!!! (again, with my SO).
Sandy
|
292.8 | | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | | Mon May 18 1987 06:51 | 8 |
| Let's bring this topic back to life. In fridays' "Dear Abby"
column, a woman wrote in to say that she had a strong desire
to kiss "other men". She is married and the mother of a 7-year
old. She claimed the desire was NOT sexual, she just wanted
to kiss. in view of her circumstances and seeming obsession
with the matter, it was suggested she seek professional
counseling. My question, do you ever want to "just kiss" ?
With no further implications ? Without it leading to "more" ?
|
292.9 | one vote . . . | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Mon May 18 1987 09:14 | 3 |
| YES!
--bonnie
|
292.10 | 2nd vote | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Mon May 18 1987 11:23 | 3 |
| Yes also
Bonnie J
|
292.11 | Why not? | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon May 18 1987 13:29 | 8 |
| I not only want to, I sometimes do. I have no interest in having
serious sex with anyone other than my wife, nor casual sex
either. Kissing on the other hand is fun and affectionate and as
long as it isn't so passionate as to resemble foreplay and give
the impression that sex is the obvious outcome I think it is
perfectly harmless.
JimB.
|
292.13 | What to say? | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon May 18 1987 18:26 | 28 |
| I have absolutely no way of dealing with a note that starts out
with "since kissing serves no logical, useful or necessary
purpose...", except to say that it is extremely alien to the way
I view kissing and human relations in general. I will say that I
refrain from any kissing that would result in unneeded and
unwanted stress to the young lady involved, but that on the
whole that hasn't been the reaction that I've normally gotten.
If the way I act offends, distresses or discomforts those who
happen to view it, I am terribly sorry. I do not, however, run
my life by what plays well in Peoria. I do have a rule that what
I'm not willing to do in public, (or at least to have known
publicly that I do) is something I should probably not be
willing to do in private. This doesn't mean living my life by
other's standards it means being sure that I live it by mine and
that I'm willing to stand up for what I believe in.
On the whole, if you read conotations into the public behavior
of others you'd better be awfully careful that your inferences
are correct before you act on them or pass them on to others as
facts. In this case, some of us kiss our friends, and mean by
that nothing more than that they are our friends and that it is
fun to kiss them. If you assume that there's something more
going on, that is your problem and your mistake. You serve
no-one well to convey your suspicions about our private behavior
to others.
JimB.
|
292.15 | No reason not too... | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon May 18 1987 23:40 | 20 |
| Nothing antagonistic seen in the above either.
I was merely stating (perhaps a little strongly) that I see
nothing at all "questionable" about kissing or holding hands
with our friends, and see the expressions of friendship, love
and mutual fun as extremely adequate reasons for indulging. Also
I have enough problems of my own to be unwilling to accept the
problems of those who form negative opinions from observing me.
To paraphrase your title and signature, I see no reason not to
do it, and no purpose to letting other people's speculations
regulate my life. It comes from my refusal to allow myself to be
motivated by or manipulated through either fear or guilt. People
will lay all sorts of guilt trips and fear on you if you let
them. And if you let them, you can end up sacrificing all sorts
of things like love, friendship, companionship, trust, honesty,
commitment, and integrity. Kissing's a small thing, but small
surrenders lead to big defeats.
JimB.
|
292.16 | | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Tue May 19 1987 00:21 | 17 |
| Um, hey guys, did it ever occur to you both that many of us kiss
others than those of the sex opposite ours and of equivalent age
and the same species?
When asked if I kiss (when I don't want to *do* it*) first answer
is - with my husband of course I do, we kiss all the time, only
more so when we are *especialy* close. But my 'yes' really meant
that, of course I kiss lots of people - my parents, my kids,
my in laws, my good friends, and even my pets....for whom I have
no desire to do anything more than kiss....a kiss is just a bit
better than a hug.
Bonnie J
|
292.17 | Oh, never! | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Tue May 19 1987 12:28 | 11 |
| Well, I'm not really all that interested in general kissing.
[Insert unsuccessfully suppressed smile here.] What I care about
is hugs. Simple little squeeze-gently-at-the-waist hugs to solid
full-contact-passing-the-comfort/pleasure hugs.
It just happens sometimes that one or more kisses fit in in the
esthetic sense. And Art must be served.
Ann B.
P.S. Why, no, I don't know anyone named Arthur. Why do you ask?
|
292.18 | Oh, yes. | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Tue May 19 1987 14:36 | 15 |
| Sure it has occurred to me that many of us kiss friends not of
the opposite sex and equivalent age. Being your basic fan of
kissing, a lot of it happens around our house. My wife and I
kiss quite a bit and we kiss the boys a lot, and they often will
literally "kiss and make up" after fighting or hurting each
other.
Less kissing goes on with my parents and siblings as the family
I head is more "touchie feelie" than the family I grew up in
which is more of a traditional reserved New England family.
The only males I kiss (other than babies) are my own sons. This,
I'm willing to admit is culturally dictated but such is life.
JimB.
|
292.19 | | CSC32::KACHELMYER | Lost in S.P.A.C.E. | Tue May 19 1987 19:02 | 13 |
| RE: .8
> My question: do you ever want to "just kiss" ?
> With no further implications ? Without it leading to "more" ?
I certainly do! (and hug, too ;-) ).
I look at generic kissing as sinply a means of expressing oneself,
and only one of several such means. If someone sees me kissing
a pet or a human, and wants to believe that I'm dating or getting
cozy, then that *their* problem. ;-)
Kak
|
292.20 | touch in context | NOVA::GROFF | | Wed May 27 1987 14:18 | 12 |
| It is interesting that this society does not condone touching.
I am a member of a small group of people who could be called "counter
culture". What I see with them is the total exceptance of displays
of affection such as kissing, hugging, touching. It is encouraged,
supported, and desired. Some call us weird, but in many ways we
are more sane than "normal" society members.
Kissing, hugging... you bet... and no: its not always sexual.
dana
|
292.21 | Hug and Kiss for sure! | JUNIOR::TASSONE | And it only gets better | Tue Jun 09 1987 18:03 | 24 |
| In college, we had an event called "Hug Day" in which everone coming
into the student center was approached to be hugged. We wore buttons
that said "Official Hugger" (which I still have) and asked people
if they needed a hug and if they said "no", we'd ask them if they
wanted one for the hell of it.
I'm sorry to say that this "free" event didn't catch on and by 1:30
that day, no more hugging took place and Official Huggers all went
home.
As for kissing, I like kissing, just for kissing and nothing more
than a good "smooch" for the day. I wish I were kissed everyday
but since my boyfriend and I don't live together, we go days without
kissing and really enjoy "catching up".
As for kissing anyone else but my boyfriend, not in a sexual way
and mostly on the cheek (his friends, my mom). The only other person
in my family that kisses on the mouth is my niece Cara. That's
what she was taught. The rest of us just aim for the cheeks. I
don't know what that all means and I don't try and figure it out.
I'm just glad that we kiss as much as we can and even hug more
often than kissin.
Cathy (who heard a hug a day chases the blues away)
|
292.22 | THE ART OF KISSING | SHIRE::BUJAS | DICIA | Wed Jun 10 1987 15:15 | 12 |
| Sure I like kissing.
First, here in Europe, it is a custom. You meet a friend somewhere,
or are introduced to a someone within your age group, and you just
kiss them on the cheek. It depends on the country you live in. Four
kisses in France and three in Switzerland. I'm not sure about the
rest of the countries.
Now personnaly, when I'm with someone I date, I like to french kiss.
But, unfortunatly, nowdays most people don't know how to french
kiss, or should I say, not the way I like it. So when I date someone,
it will take me weeks to show him how to kiss me the way I like
it. But I guess that is just how to built a relationship.
As they say "PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT".
|
292.23 | when to kiss? | COOKIE::DOUCETTE | Chuck Doucette, Database A/D @CXO | Sun Feb 28 1988 18:30 | 6 |
| What do noters believe the custom is in the USA about when to kiss?
Do you give/expect a kiss after the first date? Some of you might say
"kiss when it feels right", but what about those who aren't experienced
comfortable kissers so it might not feel right?
Chuck
|
292.24 | paraphrasing | SPICE1::CHARBONND | What a pitcher! | Tue Mar 01 1988 08:01 | 1 |
| As soon as possible, but not sooner.
|
292.25 | There's *no* custom | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | $50 never killed anybody | Wed Mar 02 1988 09:00 | 29 |
| re:.23
There are two possible responses. The first is "go for it" and
the other is "don't". I'm not trying to be a wiseass. Let me
explain...
"Go for it"
I would think that as long as you don't appear "threatening",
going for a kiss should be okay. If she doesn't want to be
kissed, she'll say so when you try to kiss her. As long as you
don't take it personally and/or put up a fuss, you'll be okay.
If she *does* want you to kiss her, then there's no problem in
the first place.
"Don't go for it"
As long as you're not comfortable doing it, don't. If she really
wants to be kissed, she'll probably let you know (unless she's
just as shy as you are :-)). With one of my XSO's, we'd gone out
about three or four times before we kissed. That time, just as I
was on my way out from her place, I started to lean toward her
and she practically leaped at me! At later times, we had a good
laugh over it.
There's always the safe middle ground: *ask* her if she'd mind
being kissed.
--- jerry
|
292.26 | | RETORT::RON | | Wed Mar 02 1988 13:31 | 21 |
|
The last few reply were good for a chuckle... It's been so long
since I've faced this dilemma...
Of course, in most cases, the young lady's response is already known
--or at least, suspected-- beforehand. In the rare cases when it was
not, I always felt jumping her with an amorous kiss was in poor
taste (no pun intended), while asking her for permission implied
lack of confidence.
So, the approach I favored involved enlisting her help. Like
saying: "I'd like to kiss you good night; please remove your
glasses". Or, moving very slightly away, then saying: "Would you
come over here, please? I'd like to kiss you".
This, when correctly and sincerely done, always seemed to work pretty
well: that way, she was actively participating. If, on the other
hand, a lady ever chose to decline: no move had been made on my
part; I had not been physically rejected; no 'face' had been lost;
the 'mucho' aura had not been damaged :-).
|
292.27 | | SPICE1::CHARBONND | JAFO | Fri Mar 04 1988 12:17 | 5 |
| RE .26 >the 'mucho' aura had not been damaged :-)
Is that like 'macho' only more so ? :-)
Dana
|
292.28 | In England we Shake.... Hands. | BREW11::GRIFFITHS | | Thu Aug 17 1989 10:40 | 12 |
| In England things are a bit different I think.
When people meet for the first time - they (generally) would not
kiss (onthe cheek) or otherwise.. (I don't think). I feel that
we are far more reserved (shaking hands is more the norm!). I love
kissing my husband and make a point of kissing my family (which
is accepted). I'm talking about English culture (I can't speak
for Scotland/Ireland or Wales!). When I met my husbands family
they are also a huggy/kissy family, and I love it. It seems to
me that it does depend on where you are - Europe is most definately
different (and personally I loved it?). Have you noticed that in
different areas different things are acceped?
|
292.29 | Appropriate differentiation or Ethnocentrism!?! | BTOVT::BOATENG_K | Sins of Omission or Commission | Fri Aug 18 1989 01:35 | 9 |
| Re:
.28> I'am talking about English culture (I can't speak for Scotland/
Ireland,Wales!)
You mean to say there are different indigenous ethnic groups in
Gt.Britain ? I previously thought all the British people "are the same."
So you seem to be saying the Scottish, Irish, English,Welsh have different
cultures, different languages, different foods, etc.. from each other?
|
292.30 | | YUPPY::DAVIESA | | Mon Aug 21 1989 04:55 | 7 |
|
Re .29
You're joking, right?
'gail
|